Ellie wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2012 11:43:03 -0700, "BEI Design"
> <nospam_b...@comcast.net.invalid> wrote:
>
> > On designs I purchase, I usually trim longer jump
> > stitches,
> > and leave short ones alone.
> >
> > But when I create a text design I often create a full
> > stop
> > at the end of each letter, let the machine cut the
> > thread,
> > then move to the next one. That looks cleaner to me.
> >
> > Beverly
>
> I was reading a discussion about it on a forum, and
> someone mentioned that if they had to create a full stop
> at the end of each letter, it would be too time
> consuming, and easier just to clip. I haven't been able
> to download the program you told me about yet -- have to
> get to a DSL connection first -- so I haven't had a
> chance to try it out myself yet. Is it really that time
> consuming to create a full stop?
If you are writing about the PSW 2.0a digitizing program, it
is not downloadable.
http://www.singerco.com/accessories/detail/894/professional-sew-ware-psw-200a
It is installed from a CD, and requires a dongle. Also, it
costs (or at least when I bought mine) over $700.00, and
it's made for Singer machines, although it will "open" and
"save as" in almost all home machine formats. I can send
designs from my computer directly to my machine via a cable.
I cannot find any site online which is selling Professional
Sew Ware 2.0 right now.
> I agree with you -- I think it looks cleaner. Seems like
> it would be less work to create the full stop in the
> first place, than to try to snip it up later?
That is my opinion. Although if you're doing production
work, eliminating all the stops and leaving jump threads in
place is probably more profitable.
> Thanks for info! :-)
You're welcome.
--
Beverly