Foxhunting Trashes Romance (was:
James L. King III
Women Prefer ME!! <womenpre...@juno.com> wrote:
> Some Guy Writes:
>
> >I personally think "it did work" would have been worse, and I think
> >there is a great story in checking out which woman got what I would
> >call a "date rape" because of this speed seduction courses. (The way
> >to check this is by finding out "some time after the faxts" how the
> >"secuced" victims feel about what happened.
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, because I want to understand you.
> You say finding out how somebody feels some time after the fact
> is most important. This is because of benefit of 20/20 hindsight?
>
> <-----It is in America where women and sex are concerned. At ANY time, if
> ANY of the wonderful feelings you are instilling don't materialize, or if
> you are found out to have lied to get her into bed, WATCH OUT:
> retribution from all sides -- male relatives, rivals, and even the law --
> is a real threat. This is something Ross doesn't DARE talk about because
> it strikes at why men are not this aggressive to begin with. Foxhunting
> deals with the problem by leaving no doubt regarding the Fox's interest
> beforehand (it is preemptive in that way). The goal of an SSer is to
> HYPNOTIZE A WOMAN WITHOUT HER KNOWLEDGE TO HAVE SEX.
I thought you said SS was all just smooth talk. Are you saying that
"smooth talk" is hypnosis?
> God help any SSer
> if a court ever sees this as rape. It could also be construed as deceit,
> and Blutos tend not to care too much about legality. Only ONE negative
> reaction is enough to put an SSer out of commission.
>
>
>
>
> Anyway by same reasoning, if a guy later regrets paying for dinner
> having a bad date, did she "date rob" him? It seems that being an
> consenting adult at the time is not enough, because emotions and
> other factors can cloud the issue. So if a woman gets to decide a
> sexual encounter was "date rape" after the fact, then a man can
> decide paying for dinner was "date robbery" or "date fraud" after
> the fact. They are both adult and always live by same standards,
> otherwise is sexual discrimination. One more thought. If the man
> has second thoughts after the sex, did woman also "date rape" him?
>
> <--------A man did win a case against a woman he married who he found out
> never loved him;
Can you provide details, such as where this case was held? I can't find
this case in any searches.
> I believe he was awarded a few hundred thousand dollars,
> in fact. Women who can prove that they were in altered states of mind
> and with reduced consent capabilities have prosecuted rapists. As SS
> becomes more known, and as women compare notes, the threat of this
> becomes more real with every day. Underlying is a very unfair premise:
> that women are right and always in need of proection, but that is not
> going to help the men victimized by this injustice one iota.
>
> I designed Foxhunting with a lot of this backlash in mind, stemming
> originally from the Thomas-Hill hearings. I did not want women to be
> able to put a negative spin on anything, so they always know what they
> are getting into beforehand, and that they are doing so willingly.
Anyone can always put a negative spin on everything, unless you make
the process so clinical (I'm sorry, before I talk to you, you must sign
this contract first which eliminates any liability from me regarding
this relationship which might happen.) that nothing would take place at
all.
Romance is spontaneous. That's what makes romance exciting and gives
people that romance rush that some people are addicted to. Foxhunting
removes all romance from the equation of relationships, by removing any
spontaneous actions from occuring in relationships.
James King
--
Enjoy a classic 30-minute drama absolutely free! http://www.shadowradio.org