Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The chocolate boyfriend destroyer...2 great tastes that taste great together.

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Odious

unread,
May 11, 1999, 3:00:00 AM5/11/99
to
Outfoxing The Foxes wrote:
>
> Some Guy Writes:
>
> Last night I was chatting with a lovely little cutie who is all sorts of
> excited by me. She knows I use SS, I told her that I have these skills.
> She loves it...she wants more and more and more. She's also married.
>
> <-----Chatting where? Online, phone, or offline?
>

Both online and phone.

> So I told her right up front that she needs to be aware of something.
> That if she experiences this, it will probably be so much more pleasure
> than she's ever felt before, that when it is over she won't be able to
> derive pleasure from her current situation.
>
> <----And after you do that, the next SS guy won't have the novelty.

Please lets see your proof of this.

> She asked me what I meant, and i said, "Have you ever had really good
> chocolate? I don't mean like a candy bar...I mean really good pure,
> silky chocolate. Really fantastic high quality stuff that taste so good
> the experience of eating it just overwhelms you?" She said she works in
> a place that makes such chocolate.
>
> <----Got proof?

Got proof that she works in a place that makes chocolate?

> Didn't you use your normal d/s, b/d-s/m approach like
> you did on....um, never mind.

Yawn...sure ray.


> "Once you've had that really good stuff, you find that you just can't
> really enjoy the cheap stuff as much any more."
> She said, you're right...I can't eat that stuff any more.
> "Well that is just like when you experience these feelings with me. When
> you've experienced them fully, you'll find you don't derive as much
> pleasure, if any, from your current situation."
> She replied, So you're the gourmet chocolate? Well so, you advise
> against it?
>
> <------Note that she recognized your pickup attempt.
>

It wasn't a pick up you goon...the pick up was a while ago. This was a
conversation.

> "No, not at all...I simply want to make sure you are aware of just how
> powerful this experience will be. It is something I want to make sure
> you know now...before you move forward. And I want to make sure you know
> that there is very real chance this will happen and you'll find that once
> you've experienced these things, you won't find what your hubby does to
> be nearly as fulfilling. You might end up having to teach him SS."
>
> <---------Odds are the marriage is already destroyed.
>

Maybe...maybe not. Though she is still with him.

> And then she said the kicker...she said she didn't think she'd want him
> to be able to make her feel this way.
>
> <----Which means that SS isn't what got you the woman.
>

How do you figure? She meant that it would not seem right coming from
him...she would not feel comfortable. However she wants me to use this
stuff on her, and she wants it so bad she is willing to cheat on her
hubby to experience it. How can you claim it is not due to SS.

You are a joke.

> So what do you think...I see a lot of potential for a comparative
> boyfriend destroyer.
>
> <-----I think empty-net goals do not count.

Sure, you don't...that why you wait for them to come to you and you have
a 95% failure rate. BTW isn't an open 3 an empty net goal.

--
Check out The Spiffy Page:
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Capsule/2160

0 new messages