Gordon Roy Parker can't stand it...
John C. Ryan, Jr.
>>
>> Jack Writes:
>>
>> Many of you do not know what has been taking place in my life over
>> the past few weeks, so I'll give a brief rundown. I've been dating a
>> new woman, and it's developed into a serious thing.I'm about as
>> off-the-market as a guy can get. Monogamous LTR here.
>
> <-----Doubtful, once your history here is known to her, but possible.
>
Oh she knows a lot about my history. I've answered every question she's
asked, without hesitation, guile, or evasion. She knows that I have
women coming out of the woodwork, because she's seen it for herself. I
first gained her serious attention, from a past dalliance with a friend
of hers. She's not the least bit concerned about my history, as some
particular Herpes-infested loser is. She knows that I am an attractive
man, that's what attracted her in the first place. She's looking to the
future. And so am I.
BTW, what part of "off-the-market" don't you understand? There's nothing
doubtful about it. I am not available for any other woman. She is not
available for any other man. We are exclusively involved. We do not have
an open relationship. We are a couple. Period.
Geesh, but you're dull-witted.
>
>> Now, the incredible thing is, I have never seen so many HBs coming
>> out of the woodwork, and all after me. I guess the concepts of Social
>> Proof, and "women wanting a man that someone else has," really are
>> true. I had to see it to believe in the power of these things.
>
> <-----Look it up: FRIENDLY FOX. PIVOT. Copyrighted October 1998,
> and it's "new" to you now. What a fucking laugh.
>
Can't twist the written word, you idiot. I said that these "Concepts...
really are true." I had to see the power of it working to fully
comprehend their power. That's a far cry from me even LOOKING like I'm
giving you credit for someone else's work. You claim Social Proof as
YOUR work? Try reading "Influence" by Dr. Robert B. Cialdini, Ph.D..
Chapter 4. Copyright 1993, HarperCollins. I bet Dr. Cialdini would be
pleased to hear that you're claiming credit for his work. 1998, 1993?
Looks like he beat you to it, by 5 years. Oops! That makes you a
PLAGIARIST! Did you even graduate high school?
Besides, how can she be a so-called "friendly fox" when this happens and
she's not even there? How could I utilize her services as a "pivot" when
we're not together? How could it be possible, for her to do anything to
increase my desirability, when it happens, and she's not even present?
You read at less than a 3rd grade level if you can't understand that.
These women that are coming out of the woodwork to vie for my attention,
and are doing so, in the grocery, the dry-cleaners, the library, and
everywhere else.
If you ever bothered to get out of that basement you live in, you'd see
that you can't outsmart an intelligent man. You ready for that
Class-Action Lawsuit now?
>
>> Anyhow, I just wanted to state for the record, that the things one
>> learns in life add to the singular qualities that make you who you
>> are. We all really are greater than the mere sum of our experiences.
>
> <--------It's cool you endorse my methods all of a sudden. Makes one
> wonder, though, that if you are only NOW seeing this, why weren't all
> those other women you were with producing the effect?
>
I'm not endorsing anything you claim to have written. Where does it say,
"I endorse Ray's trash" ??? Nowhere. I stated the obvious, you moron.
You're so desperate for social acceptance, that you think people are
praising and crediting you when they state the obvious. What an
imbecile. How desperate for attention must you be, to try to take credit
for MY relationship? Can you say, "Jealousy"? I knew that you could.
When are you going to meet me in person to discuss this? I'm still
perfectly agreeable to purchsing all the necessary tickets and
accomodations to facilitate a meeting. Don't even try to say "in court"
because we all know that you won't ever see the inside of a courtroom,
as a plaintiff. You don't have any kind of any case, and if you did, you
wouldn't know what to do with it if anyone shoved it up your ass. IF
they could get it past your head. How pitiful it is, to threaten a
lawsuit, because you were insulted on a usenet newsgroup, you
voluntarily read.
>
> Have fun explaining this NG to her.
>
Actually, she's read the NG. I told her all about it over the weekend
that we went to the mountains. We looked through several hundred past
posts together. She thinks the idea of a newsgroup, where men can
discuss how to level the playing field is fantastic. One of her comments
was: "If this is seduction, do it to me again. I like it!"
She also read many of your posts, and viewed your website, which she
promptly rated as garbage. "He actually believes this crap? He won't
*ever* meet, much less attract, any kind of decent woman, with that
garbage." She knows that you like to threaten lawsuits, she knows that
you try to take credit for other's work, she knows that you are not
respected here, and she knows that you have Herpes, and finds that
"deplorably unethical. Any man that would try to seduce a woman, if he
had an STD, is beneath the pale of humanity." She's also said that she
now knows why I am so much in demand. "You really have a handle on the
games that women like to play, Jack. I can see why you're so popular."
God, this woman is great.
Twist THAT around.
--
Jack
<----------<< =+= >>---------->
The problem with Paradigms,
is that Shift happens...
And the Shift has happened.
(Reverse "oohay" to reply.)
Vince Runza
> that we went to the mountains. We looked through several hundred past
> posts together. She thinks the idea of a newsgroup, where men can
> discuss how to level the playing field is fantastic. One of her comments
> was: "If this is seduction, do it to me again. I like it!"
Well, Jack, I suppose there's no point in telling you Ray will find fault
here. Just keep in mind, the guy has a vested interest in maintaining
conflict and dissent for the purposes of...come to think of it, I really
have no idea why. I do know he gets his rocks off playing the fool...
Perhaps you could ask the lady in question to post here. Also, Kate is
talking about putting together a newsgroup for women - an "anti-Rules"
alternative for AFChicks.
> She also read many of your posts, and viewed your website, which she
> promptly rated as garbage. "He actually believes this crap? He won't
> *ever* meet, much less attract, any kind of decent woman, with that
> garbage." She knows that you like to threaten lawsuits, she knows that
> you try to take credit for other's work, she knows that you are not
> respected here, and she knows that you have Herpes, and finds that
> "deplorably unethical. Any man that would try to seduce a woman, if he
> had an STD, is beneath the pale of humanity."
Sorry, Ray. 4 out of 5 ladies (who expressed a preference) think you are a
nut case with a disqualifying impediment - your personality.
She's also said that she
> now knows why I am so much in demand. "You really have a handle on the
> games that women like to play, Jack. I can see why you're so popular."
So, she thinks you really have a handle, huh? <smirk> I better quit while
I'm ahead...
> God, this woman is great.
So are you.
Sincerely,
Vince
John C. Ryan, Jr.
> Jack wrote:
>> Actually, she's read the NG. I told her all about it over the weekend
>> that we went to the mountains. We looked through several hundred past
>> posts together. She thinks the idea of a newsgroup, where men can
>> discuss how to level the playing field is fantastic. One of her
>> comments was: "If this is seduction, do it to me again. I like it!"
>
> fault here. Just keep in mind, the guy has a vested interest in
> maintaining conflict and dissent for the purposes of...come to think
> of it, I really have no idea why. I do know he gets his rocks off
> playing the fool...
> Perhaps you could ask the lady in question to post here. Also, Kate is
> talking about putting together a newsgroup for women - an "anti-Rules"
> alternative for AFChicks.
>
She's mentioned it once or twice, in casual conversation, but she is
smart enough to see Gordon Roy for what he is. She knows that he will
likely attack her, or simply insist that it really isn't her, or that
she's only doing it because I've hypnotized her, or some such crap. She,
like many others, has come to the realization that Gordon Roy isn't
worth the effort. To quote her directly, "I wouldn't pee in his shoe, if
his foot were on fire." Gotta love that!
Of course, she comes from Virginia "Foxhunting" lineage, so she's really
too good to descend into mere "Ray" Bashing. LOL! Say, who's the
Foxhunter now? Hahahahahahaha...
>
>> She knows that you like to threaten lawsuits, she knows that you try
>> to take credit for other's work, she knows that you are not respected
>> here, and she knows that you have Herpes, and finds that "deplorably
>> unethical. Any man that would try to seduce a woman, if he had an
>> STD, is beneath the pale of humanity."
>
> Sorry, Ray. 4 out of 5 ladies (who expressed a preference) think you
> are a nut case with a disqualifying impediment - your personality.
>
Vince, are you sure that there isn't a little British in your ancestral
mix? You surely have a gift for understatement.
>
>> She's also said that she now knows why I am so much in demand. "You
>> really have a handle on the games that women like to play, Jack. I
>> can see why you're so popular."
>
> So, she thinks you really have a handle, huh? <smirk> I better quit
> while I'm ahead...
>
What's the old Burger King commercial?
Oh, yes... "It takes two hands..."
?
> > God, this woman is great.
>
> So are you.
> Sincerely,
> Vince
>
Thank you, kind sir. It takes one to know one.
--
Jack
<----------<< =+= >>---------->
The problem with Paradigms,
is that Shift happens...
(Reverse "oohay" to reply.)