or on ebay at http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=13539&item=3586398655
Not soon enough, if you ask us.
Wonder why RICO Raytardo isn't threatening this guy with all sorts
of legal-ish babble? It's probably because Sutton=Parker, or worse,
Ray knows he'd get his head handed to him in a court, if he went
after anyone for anything like this...
So where *IS* our subPEENA, Gordon Roy?
43 days gone, 77 days left, and NO SERVICE.
Time's ticking away...
---
-
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from "Ray Gordon"
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.
The site has been updated, and can now be found at:
http://www.ray-gordon.com If Mr. Parker feels that the
original site is is significantly different, he should
upload it to the internet, so everyone can compare the two.
Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.
The OFFICIAL Ray Gordon FAQ: http://www.ray-gordon.com
Everything you need to know about Usenet's biggest NewsLoon!
BACK by POPULAR DEMAND! For an UNlimited time!
40,000+ Satisfied Visitors, 1 Disgruntled Malcontent.
-=-
This message was posted via two or more anonymous remailing services.
The Federal Rules of Civil Proceedure are readliy available, and Rule 11
provides sanctions for frivolous lawsuits. Even is Ray were to file such a
lawsuit, the other party has to be served withing 365 days or the suit is
dismissed for failure to prosecute. Federal Court is normally a very
expensive affair, however when someone files a frivolous suit such as a RICO
action, a motion for Summary Judgment or Dismissal is normally all that is
required to quash it. RICO is a very very difficult thing to prove, and
even though it's bandied about in a lot of different civil contexts, it's
innapropriate for most civil litigation, and certainly for anything that
goes on in this newsgroup.
I suggest that the lawsuit talk be given the exact amount of notice that I
give the one who blathers it constantly, hit the button and block the
ravings of the lunatic fringe.
Enough already
El Kabong
"EditorialStaff" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:6FP43YDP38029.5522453704@anonymous...