!NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

[James L. King III]

In article
<19991013.220140.-244915.17.O...@juno.com>,
Women Prefer ME <outfoxing_____...@juno.com> wrote:

> Oedipus Writes:
>
> > When ever somebody who laid 20,000 women dies...it warrents mention. I
> > mean come on....ross is a master and he has at least 200 or 300 women
> > to
> > go before he hits the 20,000 mark.
> >
> > <-----Yeah, that's why models he works with threaten to walk off the
> > shoot,
>
> According to don steele, who we all know is about as honest as you are.
>
> <----To be fair to Ross, that's not a knock on him. In my own book I
> said women hate seducers the way cornerbacks hate Jerry Rice. It doesn't
> say much. Most men who get laid a lot also piss off women a lot. It's
> just the way it is. Still, Ross could do well with FOXHUNTING in his
> professional appearances.

What, you mean he should avoid people, stay online most of the time,
and when he goes out, wear a wedding ring and hold up a book about "How
To Be A Professional Psychic in 30 Days or Less" and only approach
those people who approach him first?

Yeah, good strategy there. And I'm not exaggerating all that much. The
book could be titled "How To Be A Professional Psychic in 24 Hours" as
far as I know.

> Then again, he wants to be true to his system
> so I guess that's out of the question for him.
>
>
> > why talk-show audiences laugh at him,
>
> On a comedy show, hosted by a comedian, imagine that.
>
> <-----PI? Sort of. Ross clearly bombed on that show. He had a great
> opportunity to make a case for the good aspects of his work and blew it.
> The first thing he should do in that situation is pre-empt the audience,
> and explain the inherent difficulty of demonstrating SS with a hostile
> audience.

Excepting that just brings more ammo to the opposition -- if you follow
Sun Tzu, you never present yourself as being weak. Of course, if you
follow Lao Tzu, you relish in being weak, because in apparent weakness,
there is strength. So perhaps there's a point there. But in this case I
think I have to side with Sun rather than Lao, as much as I revere
Lao's teachings.

> His presentation of the theory is incomplete because he is
> trying to convince people that all women fall for this stuff, when in
> fact only a subset do, namely the women who are vulnerable to smooth
> talk.

Ross has specifically stated several times before that not all women
"fall for this stuff," as you put it.

You choose to ignore that because it pokes holes in your arguments.

> Ross also understands female behavior and thought patterns very
> well; I just don't agree with what he does with his conclusions.

You mean succeed?

James King

--
Enjoy a classic 30-minute drama absolutely free! http://www.shadowradio.org