Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

ATTN: TOM, @home abuse number?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

natt_t...@my-deja.com

unread,
Nov 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/3/99
to
In article <19991103.043459.-2969...@juno.com>,
womenpre...@juno.com says...
> Some Guy Writes:
>
> I think you misunderstood the post; it was directed at Ray, the
> newsgroup's resident psychotic, not at Ross or SS.
>
> <--------Insult the competition.....typical abusive little-man behavior
> indicative of the type of man who uses this tactic.

F30.2 Mania With Psychotic Symptoms

...Inflated self-esteem and grandiose ideas may develop into delusions,
and irritability and suspiciousness into delusions of persecution. In
severe cases, grandiose or religious delusions of identity or role may be
prominent...


Describes your admitted bipolar disorder quite well -- especially your
claim to be Jesus and your conviction that Ross is masterminding a
massive conspiracy to discredit you. Part of the classic definition of
"psychotic" is that the subject cannot tell his delusions apart from
reality.

In some states your delusional behavior, coupled with your documented
Internet threats to kill little girls, are enough to have you committed
against your will. GET HELP, Ray.


> Other than that, this is quite good advice and I would second it to
> anyone thinking of buying the SS course. It does take some courage and a
>
> real commitment to put Ross' stuff into practice. It took me a few
> months and a lot of practice before it started to come naturally.
> Ultimately, the effort was one of the best investments I've ever made --
> I'm getting quality women I could only have dreamed of a couple years
> ago, and I'll never again have to put up with the crap most AFCs are
> convinced they have to endure.
>
> <------If by quality you mean LOOKS, perhaps....but BEHAVIOR? Get real.
> Any woman who would jump into bed with a guy she just met is a slut; any
> woman who would fall for a canned method of word patterning is gullible.

In a way I sympathize with you -- it must be hell to see so many other
people having fantastic success, while you have to settle for IMs and
phone calls to a woman you describe as a lying, drug-addicted slut. Has
it occurred to you that trying to shoot down others' success has no
effect on them, but does reinforce your own bitterness and isolation?


> I do think some people become discouraged if they focus ONLY on
> memorizing and reciting patterns. It's much more important to
> incorporate the principles into your behavior and attitudes, to the point
> where patterns just incorporate themselves into your conversation
> naturally.
>
> <---------Amazing how rationale you can be when you aren't mouthing off.
> Of course, how do we know you aren't Ross under another name? He was
> already caught once doing that. For all we know, there are MANY names
> which are actually his. If he did it once, who knows how many times he's
> done it before?

I won't refute this one, because I personally think it's hilarious how
MANY people you suspect of secretly being Ross. Why limit your
suspicions to USENET? Perhaps several of the women you IM with are
actually Ross. Maybe Michelle is really Ross using a voice modulator.
And have you taken a good look at your mailman?


Natt the Hat

Tom

unread,
Nov 3, 1999, 3:00:00 AM11/3/99
to
>
> I won't refute this one, because I personally think it's hilarious how
> MANY people you suspect of secretly being Ross. Why limit your
> suspicions to USENET? Perhaps several of the women you IM with are
> actually Ross. Maybe Michelle is really Ross using a voice modulator.
> And have you taken a good look at your mailman?
>
hahaha, he won't sleep anymore;
Have you checked your phone line ?
hey guys, should we tell him about the ray-cam web site ? look for hidden
cameras at your place Ray !

Tom


0 new messages