Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

A few statements from Gordon Roy Parker...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

EditorialStaff

unread,
Nov 19, 2005, 10:33:23 AM11/19/05
to
All of these are statements from Gordon Roy Parker:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: betfor...@aol.com (Bet For A Living)
Newsgroups: rec.gambling.sports
Date: 12 Sep 2001 00:42:30 GMT
Subject: Re: A MASTERPIECE
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Lines: 186
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
References: <9nm84r$sb0$1...@news.netmar.com>
Message-ID: 20010911204230...@mb-fp.aol.com

> Only you can use the deaths of thousands of innocents to
> progress your petty, vain and superficial vendetta against
> all of your victims. Grow up you lousy piece of shit.

These "innocents" are everyday people who are part of the
EVERYONE quoted in "everyone hates you, Ray."

They worked for companies who practice employment discrimination.
I don't consider the loss of their lives to be significant because
their bread-butterers didn't consider the loss of my career to be
significant.

I have been taunted over my living situation, and defamed online
to the point of a terrorist attack. Well, look at THEIR living
situation if you want to REALLY have a good laugh. I'm not the
one living in a city covered by SOOT.

The humanitarianism you ask me to show others is something others
have never shown me. They don't obey civil rights laws, so the
loss of their own civil rights has a poetic ring to it.

Those who don't want to see me laugh at this tragedy should never
have laughed at any of mine.

> Keep a lid on your crap for at least one day out of respect
> for all of those that died.

I have no respect for those who died. That's the point.

I consider mass employment discrimination to be an act of
terrorism. If I believed for ONE MOMENT that those left standing
would change their ways, I would of course change mine.

You are seeing a nasty form of political protest on my part
which is 100 percent Constitutionally protected. It is supposed
to make you vomit; it was DESIGNED that way to illustrate what
it is I see in others. By reading my words, you get to stand in
my shoes, and just for that one moment........

> Count your blessings that you were not among them you vile,
> cowardly piece of stalking shit.

I'm no stalker, and those who would say it, or those who would
BELIEVE it (many "good people" who died today probably would
have been swayed by the lies), to me are subhuman. I don't wear
your shame. You have no ability to judge me, no moral standing
whatsoever. I spent the past 15 years judging others only to be
told that no one cares about who does what wrong. Don't go getting
up on that soapbox now after I wore it out.

> Only you CAN justify in your diseased mind, an attack on people
> in a lousy little gambling forum,

Who am I "attacking?" I am expressing my lack of sympathy for
the loss of a bunch of self-centered, asshole New Yorkers who
were determined to see that I did not live OR work in what is
left standing of their "fine city." May they all rot in hell,
every last one of them. Those who aren't "them" would never have
tolerated civil rights violations against me. Not my fault if no
one chose to stand up before this. Anyone who TRULY were opposed
to my conduct wouldn't ever have engaged in the type of
"terrorism" against me which they seem to hate when it's directed
to others.

Once again: no significant loss of life in those Towers. Americans
just can't seem to get the message that the way they behave pisses
people off. It provokes my words and Bin Laden's bombs. The only
difference is that I'm not breaking the law, while he is.

Anyone who wants to see my good side is free to help me build a
fair society, but most men who would do that fear that they might
have an old, ugly, or overweight woman for a secretary, or worse,
a man.

No significant loss of life in those Towers.

> at the expense of like TENS of THOUSANDS of innocent people.

I'm not the one who blew them up, am I? I just laugh at the poetic
justice of it all.

No one of any significance died in that blast. Just a bunch of
asshole New Yorkers who thought it was okay for me to lose my
place to live there, and who thought hiring eye candy was more
important than justice. Stop falsely demonizing people if you don't
like the consequences of doing so. You, and others like you, have
created the "monster."

> Steve started this thread with a fantastic, humanitarian
> suggestion. Someoen else followed it up with a similar helpful
> suggestion in this TIME OF NEED. And you go and make a mockery
> of it just because you can.

I express my heartfelt view that I cannot have sympathy for those
who thought it was okay for me to starve to death. In my view they
deserve any tragedy brought upon them. I only use words; I don't
break laws; employment discriminators DO.

When EVERYONE agrees to be good, I'll sign up. You want to get the
ball rolling?

> Everyone else is easing up today.

Which NYC firm is hiring me as a secretary again? Sorry, not
everyone. No significant loss of life in those towers.

Not a single one.

> Thousands have died and thousands more have lost mothers, fathers,
> brothers, sisters, sons and daughters, and more.

Well, people said EVERYONE hated me....so I guess those people hated
me too. I lost a career to employment discrimination, and no one
seemed to care. In fact, the FIRST discrimination I experienced came
right out of that building. I have no sympathy for corporate criminals
who perish.

> Likely dozens of police and firefighters have given up their lives
> to save these people, in valliant efforts, all for naught.

Those men are well-compensated for the risks they take. They get
to lord over women how much POWER they have, and they get to do
things we can't. Since when is someone doing their job a cause for
celebration? I thought that's what we were paying them for.

I am not callous and unfeeling; I am just not a sucker. When everyone
plays nice, so will I, but it has to be all-or-nothing. You want to
get that ball rolling? I doubt it.

> And you reduce it all to a snide remark in your juvenile flame wars.

Oh no, this is a deeply-held opinion. Want to schedule a press
conference? I'd tell this to the world and explain exactly why.
As I said, without employment discrimination, there was a 50-50
chance I'd have wound up working in what used to be that building.
Not only did these assholes break the law, they saved my life
(possibly), and in the process, cost themselves their own or those
of the office whore they hired in my place who died today instead
of me. Look for a monument to the "unknown office whore" as a war
memorial. Collectible to follow. Pretty damn good day at the office
if you ask me, especially since I'm not the one who hijacked the
planes.

> You should be embarassed, ashamed, and apologize to everyone
> immediately.

Those emotions apply to those who discriminate in employment, not
me. As I said before, I have no sympathy for the loss of life among
those who saw no problem with the loss of my life.

As others have said here, EVERYONE hates me, right? Well, now it's
EVERYONE MINUS THIRTY THOUSAND.

Don't you realize that these dead people were already spoken for?
They are part of EVERYONE........if not, people need to learn not
to speak for EVERYONE.....

May those who died today rot in the hell they deserve.

Ray Gordon, Author
The Nice-Guy Graveyard: Where men go to bury their kindness and be
the jerk women love
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: stage hypnosis in US--please be careful
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 22 Oct 2002 22:53:14 GMT
Message-ID: <20021022185314...@mb-de.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

To this newsgroup:

Letting the anonymous remailer do your dirtywork for you isn't
going to shield you from legal liability.

In the amended complaint, several regulars from this newsgroup
are going to be named because they have linked to the site in
question, thus endorsing and republishing its contents.

Further, for those who act like THEY aren't provoking me, they
don't have to, as they have the remailer to do it for them while
they can just do nothing and bury their heads in the sands as if
these posts aren't appearing after ALL of my postings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Lines: 16
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis
Date: 12 Sep 2002 22:15:52 GMT
References: <aef6d556.0209...@posting.google.com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: Ray Sues; The Idiot's Critics Laugh
Message-ID: <20020912181552...@mb-de.aol.com>

I will subpoena the identity of ANYONE who links to that site.

As I have said before, the site's contents are false-light defamation
and a conspiracy to have others promote it by linking to it. Your
act is a furtherance of that conspiracy. Your username will be added
to the subpoena I send to Time Warner, and you may wind up listed as
a defendant when I amend the complaint.

Good day.

Everything you need to know about women. FREE!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Lines: 25
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast
Date: 06 Jun 2002 06:40:25 GMT
References: <FqyL8.19491$Am4.8...@twister.columbus.rr.com>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Subject: Re: Ray admits to BARRATRY
Message-ID: <20020606024025...@mb-ma.aol.com>

>> Since COMCAST is the posting host here, subpeonaing the identity
>> of the poster is child's play. Just a hop, skip, and a jump from
>> where I live, with no jurisdictional problems whatsoever.
>
> Too bad you need a search warrant for that. For the warrant, you
> need the cops and the DA to get one from court. While you have been
> waiting several years for that, they most likely have been eating
> doughnuts and laughing at you.

Wrong again. You can subpoena someone's identity in a civil case. 

I have a pile of blank subpoenas already signed by the clerk of the
Federal court. I could do it as part of this action (since people
are claiming to be in touch with opposing counsel) or as part of a
seperate libel action.

The nature of the post is such that it's doubtful that any court
would protect the identity of the poster.

I also don't have to travel very far to subpoena Comcast at all.

It'll be interesting to see who this is, and it won't be too long
before I do.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: To those who don't wish to be named in that RICO action....
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 15 Sep 2002 09:42:38 GMT
Message-ID: <20020915054238...@mb-bj.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

Have until the complaint is amended to "flip sides."

Full disclosure = full immunity from civil prosecution, if you
give up someone who has done more than you have (I get to be
the judge of that).

I can think of SEVERAL people here who will be named otherwise.

Everything you need to know about women. FREE!
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: sotw...@mindspring.com (Ray Gordon)
Subject: Time to cast a spell
Date: 16 Dec 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3496fd63...@news.mindspring.com>
X-Server-Date: 16 Dec 1997 22:21:43 GMT
Reply-To: sotw...@mindspring.com
Organization: ICN
Newsgroups: alt.sports.gymnastics

I am a psychic. When I can't find justice any other way, I cast
a spell. Here's another one:

I command the heavens to make this true: Any person who criticizes
me from this point forward will experience the following:

1. If they have a child in gymnastics, that child will suffer a
paralyzing injury in the gym;

2. If they do not have a child in gymnastics, their favorite gymnast
will suffer the same injury.

I do this not to wish injury on anyone, but to tell the Gods that I
have had enough of this criticism, and that if my request in the
name of God for people to begin looking at both sides of this story
is not heeded, then I will ask God to teach a lesson to those who
ignore my request.

Just so you know, I made a similar request regarding Tabitha a year
ago, she ignored it, and her son wound up ill in the hospital for
the entire summer. That is when she made her false allegations
against me which have led to what you see here.

Anyone else want to try me? If I turn out to be right, you will
have no one to blame but yourselves.

Don't mess with a psychic.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Outfoxing The Foxes <you_____will_...@juno.com>
Subject: See You In Court, HCrapper
Date: 2000/02/14
Message-ID:
<20000214.224603.-392061.54....@juno.com>#1/1

""But judge, I heard it on the internet!" Won't matter, won't help,
and won't save you from what will be the most brutal legal defeat of
your life. Mark my words, fucker. I'm not to be messed with. I will
not respond further to you out here, but you'll get the lawsuit papers
soon enough. You remind me of another service operator I shall not
name who ran his mouth for a while until he chose to run it against
an offshore book who came all the way here to sue his ass. Then he
learned to shut up.

Class will soon be in session."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Women Prefer ME <women_purrrr...@juno.com>
Subject:Re:Ross Blows Smoke Out Of His Ass (Was: Re: Odious Uses LIBEL
To
Date: 1999/10/08
Message-ID:
<19991008.042401.-301951.2...@juno.com>

It's only a matter of time before you are dealt with, and as I
said before you can talk to the wind all you want, but know
that the legal time limits aren't even close to expiring, that
you will be sued, you will be brought to trial, you will lose,
all your assets will be seized (once a judgment is obtained),
and very likely a court order banning you from ever talking
about me again will probably come your way, with jailtime to
follow if you break it.

You brought this on yourself, punk. You have no clue what kind
of trouble you have bought yourself, and you are free to run
your mouth as much as you want here, because I can GUARANTEE
you that that big fat mouth on that ugly-ass face of yours will
be shut for you. No one can shut you up out here, but a judge
can do it very nicely in a courtroom, and that is where we are
going to have this out, and where you are going to lose.

You are one very stupid and very pathetic little boy. Ross is
even stupider. As you will all soon learn, I am no one to fuck
with. Just because I stomp cockroaches out on MY timetable,
don't think because I haven't gotten around to it yet, that I
won't. Your day of legal judgement is near, punk, and there's
not a single thing you can do to stop it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: Outfoxing The Foxes <outfoxxx_...@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Michelle The Homewrecker
Date: 1999/08/18
Message-ID: <19990818.093946.-373111...@juno.com>

<------I pity you when the judge sees you words. It's all a game
to you, punk. Lawyers have told me about what happens to people
like you when they finally do wind up sued. First, they can't
believe it.....then they think everyone including the judge and
their own attorney is conspiring against them....it never quite
sinks in that they were breaking the law, and once held accountable,
they crumble. You aren't the first person to libel me and then go
down in court, and apparently you won't be the last.

I said it before: you're a punk with nothing more than a mouth, and
nothing to back up that mouth. Don't blame me when that leads to
your downfall. It will.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: Ray's vacation wasn't nearly long enough
From: winatb...@aol.com (Win At Betting)
Date: 03 May 2002 20:56:41 GMT
Message-ID: <20020503165641...@mb-mo.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

> Go back to whatever you were doing, and let the rest of us
> return to the intelligent and educational discussions that
> were taking place before your arrival, Ray.

> And take nitwit Mark Lewis and his merry band of idiots with
> you. And please, no more Ray in Drag IM's posted...my teeth
> are still itching over that.
>
> Good God, get some help!

Nothing wrong with the attorney of course.

That says a LOT about you.

You'd have to KILL me to get me off this group, and frankly,
you don't have the nerve.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ask...@hotmail.com
Subject: My FORMAL Comment on the "death wish"
Date: 1998/03/27
Message-ID: <6fg5gb$ls7$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
Newsgroups: alt.sports.gymnastics


<------------You seem to think I fear death. I fear death no more
than Jesus did. I was Jesus in a past life, you see. That's how I
know he wasn't Christ. Note that I will be 32 years old in 1999.
I won't say more.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Gordon Roy Parker needs to get some help for his mental illness.

No sane person would write all of this, much less BELIEVE it all.

--
The Editorial Staff
-----
A quote from Gordon Roy Parker AKA "Ray Gordon":
"(For a dissenting opinion on my character, please visit
the following website: http://members.tripod.com/~rayfaq.html)*
This site contains many lies about me, but as a defender of
free speech I fully support its right to exist."
-Message-ID: <6ertau$76b$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>

*The original RayFAQ was removed from the internet as a
result of dozens of complaints from Gordon Roy Parker.

Freedom of Speech is WORTHLESS without Social Responsibility.


EditorialStaff

unread,
Nov 19, 2005, 11:05:56 AM11/19/05
to

EditorialStaff

unread,
Nov 19, 2005, 6:11:16 PM11/19/05
to
0 new messages