Ross's Illegal Behavior
Natt The Hat
Outfoxing The Foxes <outfoxxing...@juno.com> wrote:
> That he was LYING
> had nothing to do with it. I know that if the details of my love life
> were made public, I would have sold 50 million books by now.
Sounds realistic. There's an enormous market (at least 50 million) for
lengthy sheets of blank paper, but much of it is already controlled by
Charmin.
Natt The Hat
--== Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ ==--
---Share what you know. Learn what you don't.---
Roadking
> > <------Respect for the privacy of the women involved. ANYONE who had
> > top-quality lovers would never even HINT at details the way you guys
> > have. I mean REAL top-quality. Maybe one day the tabloids will fill
> you
> > in....
As James said, kinda like Madonna? How is she Ray?
> Which law? Civil or criminal? Federal or State? Cite the relevant
> statutes, Herpes boy.....
>
> <-----Conspiracy, harassment, extortion, racketeering, libel, slander,
> and defamation. It's from that group.
Which one? Don't know? Well, let's take a look at all of them.
Conspiracy: 1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or
subversive act. 2. A group of conspirators 3. (law definition) An agreement
between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose
through illegal action.
This would be interesting to prove, and in attempting you would appear quite
paranoid, Ray. Who is it? Are they coming to get you? Shit, you'd be guilty
of it if there was anyone to help you out.
Harassment: 1. To irritate or torment persistently. 2. To wear out; exhaust.
3. To impede and exhaust (an enemy) by repeated attacks or raids
Irritate persistently. Sounds more like you, Ray. Even if you can claim
this, you have irritated the entire group.
Extortion:1. The act or an instance of extorting. (Extort: To obtain from
another by coercion or intimidation) 2. Ilegal use of one's official
position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage. 3. An excessive
or exorbitant charge. 4. Something extorted.
This would be interesting. Has Ross gotten any money from you? Anything?
Racketeering: To carry on illegal business activities that involve crimes.
(Racketeer: A person who commits crimes such as extortion, loansharking,
bribery, and obstruction of justice in furtherance of illegal business
activities.)
How about this one? Didn't think so.
Libel: A false publication in writing, printing, or typewriting or in signs,
or pictures that maliciously damages a person's reputation. b. the act or
instance of presenting such a statement in public.
This is where you would be heading. Unfortunately, you too would be guilty.
Slander: 1. Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's
reputation. 2. A false and malicious statement or report about someone.
Right here too. Other than opinions, the only thing you could claim would be
the Ray FAQ, which is just what you've written and the picture, which
apparently was posted by you first.
Defamation: The act of defaming. (Defame: 1. To damage the reputation,
character, or good name of by slander or libel. 2. To disgrace)
Same as above. You would be just as guilty.
> I have nothing more to say to this newsgroup.
Uh huh.
Starting tomorrow, the
> case is my top priority and I won't be posting much here. My silence
> will speak volumes.
Yes, it will be golden.
Roadking
ha...@bigfoot.com
"unlawful". That is, they're not criminal in nature. There is such a
thing as a civil conspiracy, so if A said to B, "Let's say that C has a
loathsome disease and smear his reputation.", and B responded, "Yes,
lets do.", and A thereupon published his web page saying "C has a
Loathsome Disease!", C would have a cause of action against B for
conspiracy to commit libel per se.
Odious
>
> lots of these things, e.g., slander & libel, are not "illegal", they are
> "unlawful". That is, they're not criminal in nature. There is such a
> thing as a civil conspiracy, so if A said to B, "Let's say that C has a
> loathsome disease and smear his reputation.", and B responded, "Yes,
> lets do.", and A thereupon published his web page saying "C has a
> Loathsome Disease!", C would have a cause of action against B for
> conspiracy to commit libel per se.
>
Yes, but in this case ray IS the loathsome disease.
--
Check out The Spiffy Page:
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Capsule/2160