REPOST FROM AR: Re: Women are sheep (social proof) -- New Scientist article
Ray Gordon
Subject: Re: Women are sheep (social proof) -- New Scientist article
Path: lobby!newstf02.news.aol.com!audrey05.news.aol.com!not-for-mail
Lines: 420
X-Admin: ne...@aol.com
From: redha...@aol.com (RedHarriet)
Newsgroups: alt.romance
Date: 08 Dec 2000 15:33:34 GMT
References: <3a3029c...@news.shadow.net>
Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
Message-ID: <20001208103334...@ng-fj1.aol.com>
This article is ridiculous. How you can compare a guppy to human being is
beyond me. Scientists will try and prove anything to match their theories.
The truth is there are a few basic qualities to each species which make the
male a more desirable mate. Sometimes it is color. Sometimes it is wealth.
Sometimes it is the *way* men treat women in general. It makes sense that what
a handful of women find desirable in a man will likely be desirable to other
women, and vice-versa. For example, how coul danyone turn down someone with
good looks, a kind manner, and a large earning potential? Do you think a man
would shy away from such a partner? Neither sex would. That person would be off
the market as soon as you can say, "I do".
Personally, I notice certain qualities about a man that make him attractive
*later* to see that he IS WEARING A RING. Only a jerk would continue to pursue
the other at that point. The ring is a big disappointment or letdown. One has
to keep looking. "All the good ones are taken." Or, if that man is not a good
choice, one would never know because one cannot investigate further. If he does
cheat, obviously he is not a good choice!
Ray Gordon
The Seduction Library -- http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
Hypnosis Composition Theory -- http://www.cybersheet.com/hypno/index.html
The Revolution (Sports/Horses) -- http://www.cybersheet.com/sportpix.html
Ray Gordon
>beyond me. Scientists will try and prove anything to match their theories.
Many HUMANS have PROVEN these theories the same way.
>The truth is there are a few basic qualities to each species which make the
>male a more desirable mate. Sometimes it is color. Sometimes it is wealth.
>Sometimes it is the *way* men treat women in general. It makes sense that
>what
>a handful of women find desirable in a man will likely be desirable to other
>women, and vice-versa.
So all women think alike? Most?
>For example, how coul danyone turn down someone with
>good looks, a kind manner, and a large earning potential?
By saying it's what's inside that counts. Most good-looking guys with money
are not kind, btw.
>Do you think a man
>would shy away from such a partner? Neither sex would. That person would be
>off
>the market as soon as you can say, "I do".
And more often than not, will have made a mistake in choosing because they had
too many to choose from and didn't know how.
>Personally, I notice certain qualities about a man that make him attractive
>*later* to see that he IS WEARING A RING. Only a jerk would continue to
>pursue
>the other at that point.
Yet women lament all the time over men they cannot have.
>The ring is a big disappointment or letdown. One has
>to keep looking. "All the good ones are taken."
Hardly. Many good ones have problems finding peers.
>Or, if that man is not a good
>choice, one would never know because one cannot investigate further. If he
>does
>cheat, obviously he is not a good choice!
That doesn't stop women, though, does it?
Women want men that they think are wanted by other women.