More Ross Jeffries's posting accounts ?

[Odious]

Outfoxing The Foxes wrote:
>
> <---------If Ross's methods were so successful for us, don't you think
> our reproductive instinct would be kicking in by now and we'd be using
> them?

You are a moron, ray. Such a change in instinctual behavior would take
several generations and an environmental necessity to bring about. SS
has only been around for a little over a decade. You claim to base your
material on darwinism, yet how can that be when you show such a minuscule
understanding of basic basic natural selection concepts?

>Why would I stick with Foxhunting if SS gave me better results?

Because you're an idiot who's trying to sell crapy methods. Because you
can't cash in enough food stamps to afford a basic home study course.
Because you are a coward who is terrified of rejection to the point where
you will do nearly anything to avoid approaching a woman. Because, as
you consistently show, you are too stupid to use SS effectively.

> Why would I have bothered developing the method at all?

Because you couldn't hold down a real job and were trying to figure out a
way to make some money. You stumbled onto this group and found people
paying 200 bucks a pop for seduction information and you thought, hey I
can do that. So you barfed up a book that is half plagiarized and half
composed of your own speculatory psychotic delusions.

When called on this you desperately tried to pass this collection of crap
off as a methodology. Though every other week you contradict yourself as
to the nature of this method. Now you're finding nobody is interested
and so you're back here spaming again.

>A lot of what
> you call SS is just basic player stuff.

This from the guy who has shown over and over he has no clue what SS is
or how to use it. SS is not simply basic player stuff, however the basic
end of speed seduction is all this fucking moron can comprehend given his
psychotic inability to understand how sane people think.

> SS proper is NLP to seduce.

Yeah and Shakespeare is simply ink stains on wood pulp. That's called a
reductive fallacy, it's over simplification to the point of dishonesty.

>You
> also skirt over the issue of women who are SS-immune, and usually better
> catches than those who behave like sluts.

The only women immune to SS are those blocked off to emotional
connections or those who have walled themselves up. Again and again
you've been challenged to demonstrate this claim that SS only works on
sluts or that the best women are immune...so far you've come up with
nothing but repetition.

The fact is SS works best on the women you are trying to claim are immune
to it. Women who are beautiful, intelligent, and eager to experience
pleasure. These women are not just effected by SS, but they love it.
You can't beat that ray, and so your only option is to lie and try to
attack SS in the tenuous hope that you might be able to scrape out a few
customers who are inexperienced enough to buy the crap you're spewing.

If you methods were so great, you wouldn't have to spam in the speed
seduction group.

--
Check out the brand new Spiffy Page:
http://meltingpot.fortunecity.com/burnaby/851