Comments On Outfoxing The Foxes From A Satisfied Customer
Outfoxing The Foxes
well with cerebral methods. This letter is published UNEDITED, as it
appeared in my mailbox. Notice that I rarely have to clean up the
language of my people, as opposed to some of us who may have a less, um,
LITERATE following.......
The more I think about it, the willingness to be alone, and not to just
dial up another number, is what is most powerful. SSers who read this
can take advantage of this by PRETENDING that they would rather be alone,
and ACTING like they are alone, not because they don't know how to be a
PUA, but because being one disgusts them.
In all the noise here, it is the WOMEN who are supposed to be the final
judges of our actions. Not from a supplication standpoint, but from a
success standpoint. Engaging in behavior which you know they despise is
not the way to impress them. Knowing how to play them, choosing not to,
and resisting sex rather than lie to get it, is. I'm starting to develop
some pretty cool methods based on this concept, and the early results are
very promising. Specifically, the new methods accept as a given that
women do not like players, and that they will sooner or later learn all
of the new methods players are using (sooner now, because they're all so
neatly cataloged on the websites).
One quality woman can provide a lifetime of quality one-night stands.
Following is the letter:
Dear Ray:
I just finished my third read-through of "Outfoxing the Foxes." I
actually used a highlighter. I didn't study this hard when I was at
University, but then nobody ever tried to teach me how to seduce women
before.
Compliments on the book. It's beginning to sink in. I expect to
understand more when I apply more of the principles over time. There are
a couple things that were in "Prince Charming" that I wish were in
"Outfoxing." The alpha male through beta female scale is quite good.
Plus something else I can't remember right now.
I discovering that your insights into sexual politics are quite accurate.
Just this afternoon I had an intense discussion about dating with my
niece (we're pretty close in age, she's the daughter of my much older
brother) in which I challenged her to explain to me why being a player
was such a bad thing. After quite a bit of bullshit it turns out that
it's not okay to be a player and lie about it, and it's not okay to be a
player and be honest about it. She couldn't give me a good reason why
being a player is bad, it just is. As soon as I pointed out to her that
her position had nothing to with right and wrong, (her position was a
manipulative ploy meant to make me feel guilty for being a bad boy and
having an independent thought deviating from Fox doctrine) and that her
position was derivative of her agenda and not any real moral stance, she
crumbled. I pointed out that the male agenda is just as valid as the
female agenda and that the real wrong is to be deceptive about one's
agenda. Standing one's ground and being assertive about one's goals and
desires is never wrong.
Also, my niece wants to set me up with a friend of hers. I really don't
give a shit. I'm pretty happy being alone right now. In the time since
I purchased your book, I've stopped trying to "make it" and just work
out, read, think and try to improve myself. It's beginning to pay off.
Your system makes sense. Traditional dating advice--"just go up and talk
to her" type advice is useless. Why? Chicks and john gray (small caps
intentional) are the ones who write dating books.
Anyway, I like your book. It's the straight dope.
No need to respond to this email, I just wrote to express my
appreciation. I was leary when I ordered, but it turned out to me money
well spent.
Outfoxing The Foxes: The Thinking Man's Guide To Seduction
http://www.cybersheet.com/fox/index.html
On sale for a little while longer.
________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.
smithe...@hotmail.com
<women_purrr...@juno.com> wrote:
A person not posting under his real name (ray) gives us an annonymous
positive review of his book.
Lame.
Alan.
natt_t...@my-deja.com
I dunno, the line about "I'm pretty happy being alone right now" gives
it that ring of Foxhunting authenticity.
NH
In article <38893d9...@news.zebra.net>, smithe...@hotmail.com
says...
Kuschty Rye
>On Fri, 21 Jan 2000 00:58:42 -0500, Outfoxing The Foxes
><women_purrr...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>A person not posting under his real name (ray) gives us an annonymous
>positive review of his book.
>
>Lame.
>
>Alan.
And you expected anything less from this PROVEN lame-ass coward?
Bet he sends himself money so he makes-believe someone is BUYING it.
KR
-----------------------------
kusch...@hot123mail.com
(remove 321 to reply)
-----------------------------
ICQ#: 58446684
-----------------------------
Odious
natt_t...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> I dunno, the line about "I'm pretty happy being alone right now" gives
> it that ring of Foxhunting authenticity.
>
Yeah only ray would present a letter from a guy who is alone and needs
his niece to set him up with her friends, as a success story. If ray
considers reading his book and then being happy to be alone, as success.
WHat does he consider a failure ... a guy getting herpes and living with
his mother at age 33?
Ray claims his book will get you laid, not that it will help you to come
to grips with being alone. So what kind of desperate bullshit is this,
when he posts an anonymous letter from someone saying that they are still
alone after reading ray's book? Maybe ray was just so happy that someone
bought his book that he did not care that the person still hadn't gotten
laid.
I think ray really has ulterior motives here. I think his plot is to get
all these guys to read his book and use his methods, so eventually there
will be so many assholes using shity methods that women will all start to
think that a psychotic little freak with herpes doesn't look so bad, and
ray might get laid.
He's trying to drag down the grading curve by passing out cheat sheets
before a test, with the wrong answers on them.
--
The Spiffy Page, home of the Alt.Seduction.Fast FAQ:
http://members.home.net/odious