Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

OT: Ray-Gordon.com Archive - RICO

87 views
Skip to first unread message

H. Bedform

unread,
Mar 27, 2004, 9:43:30 AM3/27/04
to
Subject: Re: Intimidation of Federal Witnesses.
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 12 Jul 2002 11:13:27 GMT
Message-ID: <20020712071327...@mb-fl.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

>> You didnt listen when I told you the clerk said the best thing you
>> could do for your case is to shut your freaking mouth about it
until
>> it gets into court. You should have learned the phrase **NO
COMMENT**.
>> Deal with it GRP.
>>
>> Scorpion
>
> Good advice Gordon.

Like when you said your "wife was an attorney?"

Look "Vance," I'm still here, still pointing out what a windbag you
are, and still preparing that little RICO action which may have a
female friend or two of yours wondering why they ever relied on you as
a cyber-pitbull.

Oh, but women RULE you "Vance," don't they?

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Thanks guys
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 17 Aug 2002 16:35:34 GMT
Message-ID: <20020817123534...@mb-fl.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast

>> > Once again, you could legitimately claim that your system is more
>> > popular than Ross' system. So in one real, tangible sense it
would be
>> > "better."
>>
>> Define "better."
>
> Well, one way a system is "better" is by being more popular.

That's "popular." "Better" is a question of effectiveness at the cost
of the
resources required.

For example, being a drug dealer might get you laid, but at a price.

>> > best-selling book on the NYTimes list, and that you'd be
appearing on
>> > Oprah to promote it.
>>
>> Hyperbole.
>
> I'm glad you agree that you didn't really mean that.

It was common in the early internet days.....could just be delayed
though.
Winning the approval of the old media is still a second priority.
Having a
website makes a lot of it moot.

I still believe Oprah will discuss this group and many of its
products.

>> Still could happen......hadn't counted on a crapload of defamation,
>> either.
>
> You didn't expect after the harsh invective that you gave to people online
> regarding their seduction strategies that you and your system would not be
> under close scrutiny?

It's not really scrutinized. In fact, it's rarely discussed.

Defamation isn't scrutiny, it's lies I don't care to repeat here
because then I
get accused of drawing attention to them.

> It's rather like a right-wing conservative Christian bashing you about how
> you operate a business, and then he goes into business for himself. One is
> more likely to watch his business carefully to see if he "walks his talk."

I'm putting out a method absolutely free. Not much of a big deal
there.

Odd that you'd try to make this group about *me* rather than the
on-topic
stuff.

Scrutiny works in every direction, by the way.

>> No shipping? That's his viewpoint, and it's worth exploring.
>
> Of course, no shipping. You go to Borders and buy the paperback.
>
> See, his book was self-published and released to the bookstores. Life 101
> was a NYTimes bestseller, as were several other books of his. Originally
> he listed cult leader John-Roger as a co-author, but later disassociated
> with him, as is explained in "Life 102 (What to do when your guru sues
> you.)" I believe that McWilliams' books Do It!, and Love 101 were also
> best-sellers, although I don't have my resource handy to check.

"Stop the insanity" was also a bestseller.

>> Of course, this is another example of damages causing
opportunity-cost
>> damages.
>> If it's ruled that I was in fact damaged, lack of investment in
>> print-on-demand technology could be included as a secondary
consequence.
>
> I'm glad you point out the distinct possibility that the courts will rule
> that you were not damaged in any way.

Libel per se doesn't require a showing of damages. Punitive damages
also
apply.

>> > Who, specifically, is being disqualified for rule breaking?
>>
>> Wait for the lawsuits to be filed, and the parties will be named.
>
> My lifespan is a maximum of 121 years, more likely 75 or so. I'm not sure
> I have time to wait for the lawsuit to be filed.

By the time I prove you wrong, don't expect me to care at all about
what you or
anyone else thinks or posts.

Civil RICO casts a wide net, and a lot of people here may find
themselves
entangled in it.

Everything you need to know about women
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Urgent News Flash
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 06 Jun 2002 15:25:46 GMT
Message-ID: <20020606112546...@mb-ma.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

>> God help you when RICO comes down on you....soon, Davey. (that's
CIVIL RICO
>> so whoever thought it was criminal was misguided).
>
> THAT sounds like a threat.

No, it's a PROMISE, and any claims by anyone else to the contrary
would be
defamatory.

You're not a lawyer, Mr. Darrow, are you? You're also not a
mindreader.

The courts need to see how hypnotists and their groupies are behaving
online.

By the way, since RICO has a ten-year time-limit, I guess I'll see him
in court
in 2012 if I don't follow through <snicker>. But I will.

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: A little assistance please....
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 20 Jul 2002 18:32:16 GMT
Message-ID: <20020720143216...@mb-mg.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast

> I wouldn't worry... It's just Gordon's pathetic attempt at shutting you up.
> He's done this to many people, but knows he can't sue for fear of his
> deranged statments coming out into the scrutiny of the public eye. His words
> have been archived, therefore, any anti-defamation lawsuit he dares file
> will become nothing more than frivilous.

Guess again, asswipe.

Then again, if someone relies on your LEGAL ADVICE to their detriment,
well... Archives work both ways. Selectively deleting one half of them
doesn't play. The only reason I haven't sued yet is that the time
limits for suing Penn were shorter.

A RICO net is going to be dropped over this group not long from now,
and then you folks will learn the difference between what you THINK is
relevant and what IS relevant.

When that happens, make sure that you don't try to revise history in
any way, shape or form.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: High School Stage Hypnosis RAPE CHILDREN
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 20 Jul 2002 07:53:31 GMT
Message-ID: <20020720035331...@mb-mg.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

>> I'm writing about the dangers, not sensationalizing a specific
case.
>>
>> Ray Gordon, GENIUS
>>
>
> Actually, you made a specific allegation. I challenged you to show
> ANY proof that there have ever been ANY instances where this has
> occurred. You have not done so. Therefore, you have not supported
> your statement. Without support, your statement is meaningless noise
> and a waste of bandwidth.

Not to those who have children who might be put in danger.

Those people can just play it safe, and all the noise in the world you
make isn't going to stop it.

Too bad for you, isn't it?

> You have no proof. None. Zip. Zilch. Squat. Nada.
>
> Prove me wrong or be shown for what you are - someone who posts
> inflammatory statements such as this in a manner intended to hurt
> others for spiteful reasons.

Not spite at all....I know the dangers of hypnosis and have a DUTY to
WARN the public about them.

You're just mad because I won't argue on your terms. Again, too damn
bad.

Seems that little "advisory" people were counting on flew the coup
too....LOL!

If you think THIS is bad, wait until you see the REAL media blitz
that's about to follow. This is just exhibition season for me.

Maybe if the profession did a better job of rooting out its
FETISHISTS, I wouldn't have so much ammunition.

> Or would you prefer that we do that debate that you challenged me to.

Not at present. I have a few things to resolve relating to the
internet first.

I would, however, like to run a number of postings in this group by
you for your FORMAL commentary........

> I would be happy to do so under the conditions outlined - where you
> don't have to leave your home and I do my bit from a different time
> zone than the one you live in)?

No need. I'm very busy dealing with a few cockroaches on this group
who seem to think laws don't apply to them. Priority, I'm sure you
understand.

> Your call - the ball is in your court.

I have time limits for filing a RICO action against several other
people in this group and have been extremely busy making my case
before I file it, so no. I have over 2,000 posts to sort out, from
here, plus some from the DP website (yes, people even followed me over
there but were nice enough to give me jurisdiction).

See, under "civil RICO," when someone builds a hate website and
encourages others to link to it to "expose" me, and the others follow
suit, that's a CONSPIRACY. Before I proceed, I've been gathering info
on how to get courts in other districts to issue subpoenas to
ISPs.....surely you understand that while you are a model of civility,
others here don't rise to your inspiring standard and since they've
encouraged me to sue them, I wouldn't want to let them down.

Don't mean to bore you with all that stuff, as it is not relevant to
the debate or to you, but it IS relevant to my time limits.

You of all people understand one's need to clear their name when
defamed. When I'm done with that mess, I'll get back to you on the
debate. Until then, I'll just be posting my warnings.

Have a nice day.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS

http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Intimidation of Federal Witnesses.
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 12 Jul 2002 11:13:27 GMT
Message-ID: <20020712071327...@mb-fl.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

>> You didnt listen when I told you the clerk said the best thing you
>> could do for your case is to shut your freaking mouth about it
until
>> it gets into court. You should have learned the phrase **NO
COMMENT**.
>> Deal with it GRP.
>>
>> Scorpion
>
> Good advice Gordon.

Like when you said your "wife was an attorney?"

Look "Vance," I'm still here, still pointing out what a windbag you
are, and still preparing that little RICO action which may have a
female friend or two of yours wondering why they ever relied on you as
a cyber-pitbull.

Oh, but women RULE you "Vance," don't they?

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Parkers campaign to intmidate anybody with information for
UPenn
From: Scorpion <mkSco...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 00:46:37 -0500
Message-ID: <cjkihusa5nd4crfue...@4ax.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis, alt.seduction.fast

Gordie has been in ASF ASG and AH trying to intimidate potential
witnesses in his federal trial against UPenn or anybody having info or
evidence for UPenn. Trying to cover your threats with some garbage
about hypnotists and schools and abuse in gymnastics is a smokescreen.

It all comes down to an obvious effort to intimidate.

> ......RICO.....
>
> If you post it again, you're going to have a problem.
>
> Careful, Jimmy......
>
> One day the RICO net will come down on those who are trying to pretend they
> don't have ulterior motives for trashing me, and those motives will be exposed.
>
> The scariest thought anyone on the net has is that I might have the money to
> sue them properly one day. As I've said before, money is no longer the issue,
> time is. Thanks to some idiots I now have home court jurisdiction and regardless
> of my financial standing, the complaints can be filed here.
>
> Once I do, there won't be any turning back for anyone, and anyone who tries to
> pretend that they were just kidding or whatever will be shit out of luck.
>

Editor's Note: We would like to also point out, that this post is
irrefutable evidence of Ray's intent to file malicious and vexatious
litigation, in violation of Pennsylvania's Barratry Statutes. This
post clearly states that if he had enough money, he would sue everyone
who has ever criticized him.

>
> What are you going to DO about it, coward?
>
> Thought so.
>
> London courts aren't that far from NYC, only a six-hour plane ride.
>
> How about we send them the ones from the PENN EMPLOYEE, DURING BUSINESS
> HOURS
>
> UPenn Employee calls Penn Women "Japs"
>
> That's short for JEWISH AMERICAN PRINCESS. Publicity works BOTH ways, folks.....
>
>
>
> Ray Gordon, GENIUS
> http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
>
>
> Now there's more cause for uncovering your ID, and those you're acting in
> concert with.
>
> Others will be held liable due to the group dynamic here.
>
> State your full name and address for service of process if you aren't
> afraid of being sued or prosecuted, coward.
>>
>>
>> Beside served for what, a coffee invitation.
>
> No, a lawsuit and criminal charges.
>
> I'm just pointing out the obvious: these folks HIDE behind their monitors.
>
> They can't do that when they're sued.
>
> See the post "About Thom Geiger" in the archives for more information on the
> billing contact for this website.
>
>Very revealing.
>
>
> Ray Gordon, GENIUS
>http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html
>
>
> posting a SHITLOAD of other stuff which is being archived and organized in case
> it becomes relevant, well, that's NEWSWORTHY.
>
> Wonder what the women's studies department at the University would think of
> this one....
>
> You're making some very defamatory presumptions without a shred of evidence
> either way. People get sued for stuff like that....
>
> NOTE: he's posting from Canada, because he doesn't think he can be sued up
> there.
>
> Some real names and other info will be provided about the critics, but
> everything will be backed by THEIR OWN WORDS.
>
> People here will even get to watch the site as it is constructed and new names
> are added.
>
> ALL information relevant to these people will be revealed.
>

Editor's Note: Here, Gordon Roy clearly states his intention to reveal
personal information he has been collecting about those persons whom
he thinks have been criticizing his posts. If this isn't a confession
of Invasion of Privacy, we don't know what is.

>
> Courtrooms aren't anonymous places; you wouldn't likely have any relevance in
> one, or if you thought you did, you could be scrutinized much more thoroughly.
>
> Since there is a public-policy interest in preventing child abuse, I have great
> freedom to notify gymnasts, parents, and their gyms of who tries to cover this
> stuff up, and who resorts to crime to do so.
>
> List of "fetish" stage hypnotists to be circulated among high schools.....
> This'll put a stop to this QUICK.
>
> It's in the public interest. Parents will very quickly put two and two
> together and stop hiring them.
>
>You're destroying your profession on your own, folks.....
>
> The list will include hypnotists who do R-rated shows on the side, who
> participate in Yahoo! groups devoted to hypnofetish,
>
> Other links explaining their illegal conduct will be added as well, especially
> those who see no problem with "white power" groups.......
>
> Go ahead, babies, whine out here all you want....there's NOTHING you can do
> about it. It's all true.
>
> It's time to get these perverts out of our high schools.

Well see what the court officials have to say GRP.

Scorpion

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Ray makes all of you look stupid!
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 22 Jun 2002 02:10:09 GMT
Message-ID: <20020621221009...@mb-fg.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

> It is the response to the personal attacks that we must NEVER reply to. Let
> the advisory take care of that.
>
> He knows how to get you going...Don't let that happen. We all need to bite
> the bullet and give him NOTHING .
>
> Anything short of this will just encourage him more.
>
> Dianne

Open CONSPIRACY to use a hate website to attack me?

You are BEGGING for a RICO action, Dianne.

BEGGING.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Who care Ray
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 20 Jun 2002 04:40:32 GMT
Message-ID: <20020620004032...@mb-mo.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

> Ray, I have copy of chat logs where you threaten this person you refuse to name.

Psst: chat logs can be doctored.

You're not one of those chump men who believes women all the time are
you?

That's pretty sad.

> SO WHAT. YOU BROKE THE LAW.

Apparently not.

Editor's Note: This is another demonstration by Gordon Roy that as
long as no police agency arrests him, then he isn't breaking the law.
This is something that needs to be addressed.

> SHE DID NOT. GET THE DIFFERENCE?

Actually, "corrupting the morals of a minor" IS a crime. But don't let
the details get you down.

> YOU IDIOT. These chat logs would make interesting reading for the local DA.

Psst: chat logs can be doctored, though not when they are reported
directly to AOL.

> You love to imply something happen. I have copies of chat logs that show you have
> repeatedly made direct threats. Notice I don't have to try and manipulate anything.

psst: chat logs can be doctored.

> Oh, I love the chat log about the bad teeth and how you can't afford a dentist.
>
> You have any more chat logs you like to mention, oh fetish one.

Got tons actually, windbag.

> Now what will anonymistress say about you being a bad pet?

I don't know, as she's not my Mistress.

> Since you have stolen her recording.

I paid her to produce that recording and she freely admits this. Is
there a reason you perpetually LIE about others? Of course, we know
someone's putting you up to this and by admitting it they kind of made
themselves liable for this type of conduct by you, now haven't they?

> and claimed as it your own,

I produced it and I own the rights to it. Sounds like mine!

> I wonder if any laws were broken. I wonder if anyone really cares. Maybe she won't call you Ray-Ray anymore.

Thanks for proving yourself a liar again.

Ready for RICO? It's coming....

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Re: Intimidation of Federal Witnesses.
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 13 Jul 2002 12:23:01 GMT
Message-ID: <20020713082301...@mb-fk.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

>> Like when you said your "wife was an attorney?"
>
> Since when was lying to you a federal offense?

There were threats of legal action to go with it. I'll let the courts
decide that matter, just in case you're a little inaccurate.

>> Look "Vance," I'm still here, still pointing out what a windbag you
are, and
>> still preparing that little RICO action which may have a female
friend or two
>> of yours wondering why they ever relied on you as a cyber-pitbull.
>
> Because he can chew you up and spit you out.

But he can't. All he's got is a mouth he apparently has been TOLD to
keep in check.

> What evidence do you have against him that would require a RICO investigation,
> anyway?

Wait for the filing.

>
> BTW, I thought he was a cyber-chinchilla, not pitbull...

He's a MOUTH.

>> Oh, but women RULE you "Vance," don't they?
>
> Since when is coming to the aid of a fried being ruled.

Making threats and invoking the name of said "Friend" is the essence
of RICO. The "Friend" even posted messages of approval. If it's all
the same, I'll see what the courts have to say.

> Oh wait, I guess you have to have friends to understand that, don't you?

My friends are true friends, not those I use to fight battles for me.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

------------------------------------------------------

Subject: Contributor to hate website = CO-CONSPIRATOR.....
From: amodern...@aol.com (A Modern Caveman)
Date: 17 Jun 2002 11:47:59 GMT
Message-ID: <20020617074759...@mb-bk.aol.com>
Newsgroups: alt.hypnosis

......RICO.....

Ray Gordon, GENIUS

http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html

We would like to point out, yet again, that the words posted to usenet
by Gordon Roy Parker, are accurately, and directly quoted. How can
something he himself said be in any way considered a Hate Site against
him? It cant. We do not hate "Ray" or Gordon Roy Parker. We want him
to get help for his mental illness, so that he can contribute
productively, without threatening everyone in sight.

------------------------------------------------------

This post doesn't mention RICO specifically, but it does show where
Gordon Roy thinks himself "judgment-proof".

Subject: Re: SUSAN GEIGER: Teach your man some MANNERS
From: winatb...@aol.com (Win At Betting)
Date: 15 Apr 2002 02:32:18 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.seduction.fast

>> Don't know what you're talking about, sorry.
>>
>> I know who you are anyway, and this may be pissing you off, but too
damn
>> bad.
>
> Who I am is not who I am, in your mind at least. It would take a lot to piss
> me off, and you are not, quite frankly, up to the task. You, of all people,
> should know I can find many things on the web, not just in Usenet archives.
> It took all of 7 minutes searching last time to terrify you, and I didn't
> have to go offline like you admit doing. There is a lot more for the finding,
> so do you really want it found? If you ever rise to the point that I decide
> you deserve my full attention, I can assure you it will be an enlightening
> experience for you.

Too bad you don't realize how easily you give yourself away.

All you do by involving anyone in my area is open THEM up to lawsuits,
which of course would open you up to third-party lawsuits. Then again,
people who don't have an axe to grind or who who don't make a JOB out
of following me all over the internet don't care enough to implement
your agenda.

He also never considers just what I'd know about those third parties
you think are so eager to join you, but that's another matter.

If I had done something similar to what you had done, it would have
been cited as more "proof" of your agenda. If I do nothing, supposedly
I'm terrified and unable to. Nice little checkmate there, but it means
nothing.

The domain has a registrant which is called "The Conspiracy Network."
Since that contact is invalid, the BILLING contact becomes the "owner"
of the site, or at least is responsible for its content if he ignores
copyright warnings.

I used to think a rebuttal site would be a huge waste of my time, but
given the new stakes, I think the more posts I put up to show the real
story, the merrier.

I have several thousand of them archived and you seem to have
blindspots about many.

I also know which subpoena path to take to prove that you're full of
shit. I know who you are, which names you use, what you do, how, to
whom, who you work for, who your friends and enemies are, what your
reputation is in your home town, and what is inspiring you to behave
as you do.

It's why your online rambling and hot air is absolutely meaningless to
me. You are a MOUTH and very little more; a mouth that crosses lines,
but at the end of the day, still a mouth, a lost soul looking for a
cause and who thought he'd found one but found out when it was too
late to backpedal that you were sold a bill of goods by others who
were more than happy to let you take the fall for their conduct.

I have met every standard for journalism for what I will be putting on
my website. If you did some research on defamation law, you'd realize
just how immune that makes me, but if anyone wants to fork over $5-10
million in legal bills to attack someone who is judgment-proof,
capable of representing himself, and who would respond with
counterclaims out the wazoo, and spark an investigation of a few
hundred people, and be kind enough to move the fight to my
jurisdiction, I have only three words for you:

BE MY FUCKING GUEST.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS
http://www.cybersheet.com

RWS

unread,
Apr 16, 2013, 7:13:56 PM4/16/13
to
WOW Is All I have to Say
I am a reader and sometimes I look for nice blogs to read or books online.
Its funny that I came across this one because I a real woman had an encounter
with this so call Modern caveman..LOL
Now I see why he thinks people are out to stalk him or he is better than.

well excuse me but no one beats you mr caveman on Fraud and wanna be..You Got that.. and I see you wanted to be someone with me but I read right into you and called you out..Get a better life and stop the bull crap. better yet, go back to SCHOOL> It might do something for you who thinks you know it all.
Sad, but I Guaranty You That, They will tell you, YOU DON'T KNOW $H!+!!!!!! LMBO

Dr. Hyden Zeke

unread,
Apr 17, 2013, 4:01:08 AM4/17/13
to
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:13:56 -0700 (PDT), RWS
<sandrac...@gmail.com> wrote:



>WOW Is All I have to Say
>I am a reader and sometimes I look for nice blogs to read or books online.
>Its funny that I came across this one because I a real woman had an encounter
>with this so call Modern caveman..LOL
>Now I see why he thinks people are out to stalk him or he is better than.

>well excuse me but no one beats you mr caveman on Fraud and wanna be..You Got that..
>and I see you wanted to be someone with me but I read right into you and called you out..
>Get a better life and stop the bull crap. better yet, go back to SCHOOL
> It might do something for you who thinks you know it all.
>Sad, but I Guaranty You That, They will tell you, YOU DON'T KNOW $H!+!!!!!! LMBO



www.rayfaq.com



Message has been deleted

Bim Crosland

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 4:25:33 AM4/21/13
to
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:12:36 -0700 (PDT), marios....@gmail.com
wrote:

>ray, do you know about mrsex4unyc? do you have any contact info?


Bim Crosland

unread,
Apr 21, 2013, 4:26:36 AM4/21/13
to

>On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 21:12:36 -0700 (PDT), marios....@gmail.com
>wrote:
>
>>ray, do you know about mrsex4unyc? do you have any contact info?
>



www.rayfaq.com



Message has been deleted

Bim Crosland

unread,
Apr 28, 2013, 2:00:32 PM4/28/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 07:59:13 -0700 (PDT), horion
<marios....@gmail.com> wrote:

>why do you quote?

The truth shall set everyone free...




------------- Gordon Roy Parker on the day of 9/11 ------------------

>>"There was no significant loss of life in those towers. Not
>>a one."
>> - Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001


>>"This attack happened in my HOMETOWN, a hometown I do not
>>live in or work in because of illegal behavior. I hope those
>>who swiped my ability to live there enjoy the message they got from GOD
>>today.........."
>> - Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001


>>"In that building existed little more than a bunch of companies
>>which hire "office whores" and the like. I have no sympathy for
>>employment discriminators, and if someone had to die in this attack, I
>>couldn't think of a better group of people for the terrorists to pick."
>> - Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001


>>"Now you know what it's like to see your horrors mocked the way mine
>>have been. That's not mental illness, that's a political message,
>>apparently delivered quite brilliantly."
>> - Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11, 2001


>>"There was no significant loss of life in those towers. Their own
>>evil is what prevented me from being among the dead, and which added the
>>"Unknown Office Whore" to their numbers because god forbid some loser
>>executive would have to hire a man.Those corporations could have hired
>>me, put me to work in that building, let me live in NYC, and experience
>>all of the fun that's going on up there now."
>> - Gordon Roy Parker (aka Ray Gordon), September 11




---------------------------------------



------ Gordon Roy Parker threatening children, the sick and elderly
--------



>>Subject: Re: May Lissa's Mom DIE PAINFULLY ANDROT IN HELL****
>>x-no-archive: yes
>>Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 19:13:02 -0600
>>From: ray...@hotmail.com
>>Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion
>>Newsgroups: alt.sports.gymnastics

>> x-no-archive: yes

>> ****Disclaimer: I was discriminated against on the basis of
>>gender today and told point-blank that this was the reason. Having been
>>taunted by the WHOREDENS and by Lissa over this, I consider it only fair
>>to return similar sentiments. When I get a full apology from Lissa, and
>>from Dave, and his website and RayFAQ go down, I will CONSIDER changing
>>my attitude.

>> Ray, first of all STOP CURSING, KIDS READ THIS TOO!! Dave, lol!
>>HA HAHA! dang! oh shit! maaaaaan...! lol! hmmmaaaa! Ray's gonna sue you!
>>looool!!!! [laughing] shit.... hire me as your lawyer. he he ha ha ha...
>>loooll

>> <----Stop Cursing? FUCK YOU. FUCK GYMNAST WHORES TOO. They
>>know DAMN well what goes on and what harmed me and they LAUGH at it.
>>May they all do a GOMEZ on vault and have the ambulance do a GRIVICH on
>>the way to the hospital if they are going to laugh at my career road
>>blocks, sexual road blocks that they CLAIM to disapprove of...except
>>when they need a job, so then it's okay to show a little ass, as long as
>>the boss doesn't try to touch that ass. FUCK THEM. They're moral
>>GARBAGE! They know it too; that's why they can't stand hearing it; if
>>it weren't true they wouldn't care. They're good for ONE THING and ONE
>>THING only, and they know that too. If they want me to be nice to them,
>>let them undo a few years of damage and apologize for THEIR attitudes.
>>They bring this shit on themselves with their arrogance. Spoiled BRATS.

>> You think my suing Dave and Dominique is a joke? Keep laughing.
>>Please. I'd love it if you did. You want to be Dave's lawyer? Go right
>>ahead. You punks think this is playtime; you're in for an awfully rude
>>shock. I gave fair warning. Dave(and Dominique through Dave) said "Go
>>for it." I will. I'll go for every last ounce of gold that resides in
>>both their scumbag pockets.

>> See, I was being a NICE GUY about this before. I decided not to
>>be NICE anymore. I get really FUCKING PISSED OFFwhen people mock my
>>pain, enough to where I start focusing my energy on THEIR pain. Lissa's
>>pain. The pain of watching her mother die the same death my secretarial
>>career died. Yes, that death. I know what it's like to watch something
>>you love die. Watching my father die right in front of my eyes at age
>>12 wasn't as painful as watching women get sexually harassed by their
>>bosses, but that was nothing compared to the pain of seeing women mock
>>the issue, like it were okay, like they couldn't have the courage to do
>>the right thing.

>> Lissa, watch your mom fade away and think of mycareer, and then
>>think of the fact that I can revive my career. Noone will be able to
>>revive your mom. No one. She's DYING, and she's DYING slowly. Does she
>>even remember your name anymore? I don't think so.....you think Dave's
>>such a nice guy? I don't. Hedoes that page for you, Missy, Dominique,
>>and all those wonderful girls who worship him. You think he's going to
>>get away with it? He's not. If you want to see God's punishment for your
>>treatment of me, watch it in your mom.

>> My last spell went to Jaycie's knees. She still competing?
>>Nope. The next one goes to Lissa's mom. Note her condition today and
>>see how she progresses from here. Don't mess with a psychic. After
>>this one is done I'll start REALLY wishing for some Gomez action on the
>>vault, and I'll start naming names and focusing ALL of my psychic energy
>>on it.


-------------------





------------Sung to the N.Y. Dolls song "Personality Crisis" ----


YEEEAAHHHHH!!! YEAH YEAH YEAH YEAH..

<WAIT> NO NO NO NO ..NO NO NO.. N0! N0!

Well we can't take him this week
And his dolls don't need another S-P-E-A-CCCCC-HHH !!!
Hoping for a better day when this newsloon just goes away..

all' about that "..inexcusable failure.."
...if he likes it &/or no-t..
But now his um, 'hellen' & herpes, 'dats whot he got..

(Judge hadd'a rule about that "..inexcusable..") yeah...yeah yeah
yeah...

But now he needs to be a man, now he got to be 'da man'..
AND he KNOWS he gots to do it all, NOW NOW WOWS !!!
But he thinks about the times he failed, on every account..
when it sure got to be a 'drag' when he wanted 2 kill his'self..
he has to deal with "..AOL.." chat rooms where he molested about
(He molest' 'bout..)

All 'bout his "..inexcusable failure.."
..a Judge told him that.....that's what he got..
But now his mommie, and dollies, 'dats all he got..

Judge GOTTA SHOUT ABOUT HIS "..inexcusable.."

YEAH YEAH YEAH...YEAH...

<break for crowd to think the song is over..>

And he's a... coward hate monger on that 9/11 afternoon..
<livin proof of a real loonie-toon ! ! >
change on into da sock-puppet, fooling no 1 2 soon..

he WETS his UNDER-ROOOOOSSSSSS!!!!!!

......"..inexcusable failure.."
if he likes it &/or no-t....It's always "..NOT.."
But now um, 'hellen' and herpes ' dats whot he got..

That loser "..INEXCUSABLE FAILURE !!!!.."

YEAH YEAH..YEAH YEAH..

Now, with all da perks and free rides that his mommie pays
His dollies become his 'private friends' nite n day..
That "..inexcusable.." 's (failing to do it all againnnnn)
(ah ah..no longer fun..)
"..inexcusable.." will his pain ever end..?
<not 2 B so much like a..>
"..inexcusable.." impression of a joke,
..n 2 pretend 2 pretend 2 pretend too pretend,
"..inexcusable ..".." dreams of celebrities he'll never meet
(he lives their life off television)

Talkin' about that "..inexcusable failure.."
if he likes it &/or no-t....It's always "..NOT.."
But now um, 'hellen' and herpes ' dats whot he got..

hey grp-ie don't you worry

"..inexcusable failure.." please don't cry
he's just a "..inexcusable failure.." and cannot stop

Because he walks a "..inexcusable.."
Talks a "..inexcusable failure.."

--------------------



---- Proof of Gordon Roy Parker stating women deserve to be raped &
murdered :



>>From: r____a__...@juno.com (Outfoxing The Foxes)
>>Subject: Re: Need A Piece Of Advice
>>Date: 1998/11/02
>>Message-ID: <19981102.144604.2648...@juno.com>
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 0-1,3-5,10-14,23-29,32-45,47-50,55-58,60-61,74-77,
>>79-87,95-97,99-102,105-112,121-122,130-131,138-139,146-147,
>>156-157,160-161,163-164,181-182,196-197,199
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance

>>Look at the way women treat "losers" and you will see
>>why they wind up beaten, murdered, raped, robbed, disrespected, and
>>oppressed. It is because women DESERVE it. The ones who harmed me
>>should thank their lucky stars that I didn't react like a primate and
>>just dump them six feet underground. Unfortunately, premeditated murder
>>would ruin this ethical thing I have going for me, although on a primal
>>level it is quite appealing.

--------------------------------



> Path:
> sn-us!sn-xit-01!supernews.com!feeder.qis.net!feed2.news.rcn.net!rcn!how
> land�.erols.net!portc.blue.aol.com.MISMATCH!portc01.blue.aol.com!audrey
> 04.news.a�ol.com!not-for-mail Lines: 56
> X-Admin: n...@aol.com
> From: iteachhypno...@aol.come4menow (Ray Gordon)
> Newsgroups: alt.romance
> Date: 20 Feb 2001 00:04:52 GMT
> Organization: AOL http://www.aol.com
> Subject: AMAZING PROOF WOMEN ARE WHORES
> Message-ID: <20010219190452...@ng-bd1.aol.com>
> Xref: sn-us alt.romance:325108
>
>
> I go online as a female secretary looking for work again.
>
>
> Idiot lawyer solicits me for a job.
>
>
> Gives me his REAL name.
>
>
> His pic.
>
>
> The name of his firm.
>
>
> The name of the previous secretary he "wore out" before firing her.
>
>
> And a TON of other evidence which I could EASILY use to verify his
> identity.
>
>
> I thought about all the "Defenders of women" and how SILENT they'd be
> EVEN IF I posted all the evidence here.
>
>
> Never mind that he SOLICITED A PROSTITUTE in addition to
> discriminating.
>
>
> This is a very good-looking man. Very successful.
>
>
> What you folks would call a "winner."
>
>
> I wonder what God would call him?
>
>
> Of course, people would STILL say it's MY attitude, even in the face
> of evidence like this.
>
>
> Nothing makes me suicidal more quickly than to see this up front.
>
>
> I believe suicide should be a fundamental legal right.
>
>
> Suicide on demand.
>
>
> My body, my choice.
>
>
> A lawsuit can make that a reality. If I win, EVERY person gets the
> right to end their lives at any time for any reason.
>
>
> I think of all the neurotic women who would go off the deep end at
> some point under that law and how the gene pool would self-cleanse so
> quickly.
>
>
> I do have pity for the people who know these truths and ignore them,
> and what God will do to them for trying to blame me and for ignoring
> what happens to "women" while pretending to be their defenders.
>
>
> DISCLAIMER: I left USENET but have returned as "one-way Ray." I post
> but refuse to respond to people who can't handle truth about women and
> who feel compelled to lie about me.
>
>
> http://www.cybersheet.com/library.html (Seduction Library)
>
>


-------


EVERYBODY SING !!!!!

"..OHHHHHHHHHHHHH <me me me me me..U U U U U...>

A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he got no money and he can't get laid..
So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes nite-nite..
..It sure sucks to be ray...

(CONGA LINE !!!!!)

A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he gots no money while he can't get laid..
....he haunts the Net till his dollies goes nite-nite..
..It sure sucks to be ray...

(NOW, a SOLO from Fuz da BUN ! )

..it's always Saturday nite and he ain't got ladies:
..he got no money and 'hellen' can't get paid..
..REALITY is so much fun, come join us and party....
..oppps..I forgot.., the coward's name is ray..

(NOW JUST THE WOMEN)

A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..even if with tons of money he just can't get laid..
HEY, his dolly(s) get more HOT action then he does....
..It sure sucks to be ray... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

(now the men..)

HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA

..IT SURE SUCKS TO BE RAY....

<in closing, for those of U on drugs....>

A-nod-har Sat-urd-ay nite and he ain't got no-boddieeee
..he got no money and he can't get laid..
So he haunts the Net till his, um, 'hellen' goes nite-nite..
..It sure sucks to be ray...

G U R you..?

<I'm not at ALL happy with the Flash-Card section !!!!!>



------










www.rayfaq.com



0 new messages