Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Sex Nazis

0 views
Skip to first unread message

My Liege

unread,
Jun 28, 2003, 5:06:05 AM6/28/03
to
Ok, so tonight I went to a party and as I'm enjoying a martini for being
dirty and not too dry I have the good fortune to meet a woman who also
possesses those qualities. The conversation somehow veers to a discussion
about the effects of consumption of various drinks and its potential
relationship to the flavor of the drinkers semen. So we go to her place
to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."

Thinking fast, I answered "I'm sorry, but honey when you kissed me like
that you made me so excited I can't even remember my own name."

Well, a few minutes later I'm driving home wondering what just happened.
I mean, I didn't mean anything to this girl, whoever she was, and it was
pretty obvious she just wanted a physical encounter with me and that's
all she was thinking about when she invited me back to her place anyway.
Would she have been crushed if we never met again had we had sex?
Probably not. Would she even remember my name in two weeks? Doubtful. If
she'd called me or any other single man who was about to go at it with
her the wrong name we'd let it slide with her. So what gives? Then it hit
me. This girl's a sex nazi.

What's a sex nazi you ask? Well, a few years ago the TV sit-com Seinfeld
had a famous episode involving a soup kitchen that made excellent soup
based on one that supposedly really does exist in New York City. The way
it worked was if a customer veered out of line too far, didn't face
straight ahead and speak in monotone while ordering, or if they
questioned anything about the menu the owner of the place would be so
offended he would yell "No soup for you!" and refuse to do business with
them. Because of his antics, the characters in the show referred to him
as the soup nazi, however his soup was so good that they wanted it enough
they were willing to put up with all his rules in order to get some.

That's how it works with sex nazis. These women have a large set of
strict rules that if you break they become offended and next thing you
know you're at home sending money to Danimal to help speed up development
of his sex robots. It doesn't matter that whether or not the man follows
these rules doesn't really mean anything in the grand scheme of things,
nor that its hippocritical to use a set of rules in order to weed out men
who are unworthy when doing so is such an insulting way to treat men that
it makes the sex nazis themselves unworthy of them. Whether you were
slightly too sexually aggressive, you were slightly too sexually
reserved, you left the toilet seat up, you danced with two left feet,
whatever trivial thing you did that she's decided to be anal about
doesn't matter. What matters is the power trip they get from calling off
the deal, "No sex for you!". They get to determine exactly how these
relations are supposed to occur, and if you don't follow the rules
exactly, even if by accident, they can afford to lose your business
because they know there's plenty of shmucks that want their soup enough
to put up with all their rules to get some.

But there is some solace to be found in your dealings with them, first is
that there is no chance you will ever see them again while they must live
with themselves every day for the rest of their lives, and secondly that
these women will never find a "good man", because any man willing to play
by all their rules is doing exactly that, playing a game with them.

Until next time,
Hombre

Sue

unread,
Jun 28, 2003, 12:17:24 PM6/28/03
to
My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...

> Ok, so tonight I went to a party and as I'm enjoying a martini for being
> dirty and not too dry I have the good fortune to meet a woman who also
> possesses those qualities. The conversation somehow veers to a discussion
> about the effects of consumption of various drinks and its potential
> relationship to the flavor of the drinkers semen. So we go to her place
> to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
> kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."
>[snip]

Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.

Ever notice, (generally speaking) 45 year-old men are attractive to
women, but not so much the other way around.

In other words,
men who get spastic over feminism, are basically wasting alot of good
energy.

Take care!

Michael Snyder

unread,
Jun 28, 2003, 12:41:48 PM6/28/03
to

Sue wrote in message <3e1a6306.0306...@posting.google.com>...

No more than are women who get spastic about misogyny/chauvinism/
sexism/whatever. And far less than are women who get spastic about
being called the wrong name during a CASUAL sex encounter!

PsyberZombie

unread,
Jun 28, 2003, 8:23:33 PM6/28/03
to
My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...

> So we go to her place

> to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
> kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."
>
>

> That's how it works with sex nazis. These women have a large set of
> strict rules that if you break they become offended and next thing you
> know you're at home sending money to Danimal to help speed up development
> of his sex robots.

»» " That's how it works with ** THESE ** Women " ???

That's How it Works with ** ALL ** WOMEN , Masturb·VIII !!!

PSYBER·ZOMBIE'S RULE # ONE is =

Do NOT Call the Woman Yer Trying To Nail By The WRONG NAME !!!!


You VIOLATED that Rule

... and were LUCKY she didn't bash your head in with her Vibrator !!!


Oh, Well .... Live and Learn , i always say !!


.

Mark Sobolewski

unread,
Jun 28, 2003, 11:59:32 PM6/28/03
to
In article <3e1a6306.0306...@posting.google.com>,
SBot...@aol.com (Sue) wrote:

Believe it or not, Sue, what made the world a better place
was men getting "spastic" and wasting energy rather than
just allowing things to run their natural course.

Imagine, if men had gotten "spastic" about communism
before had trashed Eastern Europe. Never mind the LIVES
that would have been saved. Imagine the potential:
The great minds, the culture, the beauty of the cities
that were allowed to crumble, all of that today.
Same with feminism: Imagine if all the resources that
went into holding the hands of misandric materialistic
women were instead dedicated to silly things such
as providing opportunities to poor families and
creating a new world where dreams become possible.

Remember how people used to dream of flying cars?
Imagine if could have those instead of the pothole
ridden roads created by a government's that more
concerned with programs to appease the problem elements
in society than actually helping the economy.

Anyways, back to the topic:

The soup nazi isn't the only time that this idea
was used even on Seinfeld! In another episode,
they had a grocer who banned Seinfeld for
returning apples. On Frasier, the father was
banned from buying dog food for badmouthing
the French.

Clearly, what made these "soup nazis" so effective
was that they had some kind of monopoly.
If the person thinks there is nowhere else they
can go, then the customer is always going to be wrong.

I found this same phenominon in L.A. and even here
in St. Louis: I can't for the life of me understand
why people pay $13 for a greasy breakfast but people
think that it's a chi-chi club so they do it.
Or they see a line of wannabes outside of spagos
so they line up and wait.

The smart people hit the nice ethnic places that
are just 'holes in the walls'. I now can spot
a crap restaurant from a hundred yards away.

In order for the Sex Nazi ploy to work, a woman
must kick out of bed the best lovers she could
have for eating crackers so to speak. She has to
put her power trip ahead of her OWN sexual pleasure,
no? Sure, she has customers lining up at her door
but she isn't going to sell soup to all of them,
is she? Also, remember that there are a lot
of other "sex nazis" out there. Lots of restaurants
go out of business too. Playing this game
is VERY dangerous.

regards,
Mark Sobolewski

Neil

unread,
Jun 29, 2003, 3:24:53 PM6/29/03
to
My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...
> Ok, so tonight I went to a party and as I'm enjoying a martini for being
> dirty and not too dry I have the good fortune to meet a woman who also
> possesses those qualities. The conversation somehow veers to a discussion
> about the effects of consumption of various drinks and its potential
> relationship to the flavor of the drinkers semen. So we go to her place
> to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
> kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."

You don't even know her name and she obviously isn't all that
interested in having sex with you, but that makes her a "nazi"? Don't
be silly.

(snip)

> Well, a few minutes later I'm driving home wondering what just happened.
> I mean, I didn't mean anything to this girl, whoever she was, and it was
> pretty obvious she just wanted a physical encounter with me

If she really wanted to have sex with you, she would've. She didn't.

>a few years ago the TV sit-com Seinfeld
> had a famous episode

If you're going to refer to fiction to back up your calling a woman
you don't know a "nazi," you're pretty desperate. At least you could
refer to the Seinfeld episode where the guy never learns the woman's
name and she dumps him, but of course that's fictional too.

>involving a soup kitchen that made excellent soup
> based on one that supposedly really does exist in New York City. The way
> it worked was if a customer veered out of line too far, didn't face
> straight ahead and speak in monotone while ordering, or if they
> questioned anything about the menu the owner of the place would be so
> offended he would yell "No soup for you!" and refuse to do business with
> them. Because of his antics, the characters in the show referred to him
> as the soup nazi, however his soup was so good that they wanted it enough
> they were willing to put up with all his rules in order to get some.

Well, that's fiction, and it's just a joke, right? And some people
would consider sex more intimate,important, and personal than some
fictional soup in a silly TV comedy. YMMV.

Anyway, if some woman doesn't want to have sex with you, all it means
is that she doesn't want to have sex with you, that's all. In a way,
she's doing you a favor, because she's freed you to find somebody more
attracted to you.

So you didn't get your way, so what? Move on. Don't attack some woman
you don't even know just because she didn't want to have sex with you.
That's not going to help you find somebody more interested in you. So
turn off the PC and get out there and try to meet some new women.

(snip)

Turin

unread,
Jun 29, 2003, 5:35:20 PM6/29/03
to
And you think this was all because she had some kind of problem, and
not at all because you were using slimy bullshit which made her party
to an insult against her own intelligence?

My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...

- - -

This has been another enlightening moment, with:

Turin

I have such sites to show you...
------------------------
http://members.fortunecity.com/turinturambar/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_First/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Men_Politics/
------------------------

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----

Sue

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 12:04:30 AM6/30/03
to
"Michael Snyder" <msn...@nospam.net> wrote in message news:<gzjLa.6451$%3.29...@typhoon.sonic.net>...

Any woman who settles for "casual" sex, evidently doesn't have much
respect for herself.

Mark Sobolewski

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 12:50:23 AM6/30/03
to
neilk...@hotmail.com (Neil) wrote in message news:<daa8d05c.03062...@posting.google.com>...

It's kind of funny that you end the post with the phrase "turn off the PC"
You mean the Political Correctness?

He didn't "attack" the woman. He was only making a comment
about her. And she clearly did want to have sex with him at one
point, but changed her mind because of a minor remark.

You're a perfect example of the kind of training that men get in
appeasing women if they want sex, Neil. It looks like
you haven't been getting much considering your attitude.

regards,
Mark Sobolewski

Adventuro...@comcast.net

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 12:38:36 AM6/30/03
to
In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:

: Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,


: but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
: words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
: attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.

<snicker> Yes - around 27-29 is when ye-olde clock starts
getting noticeable - or seems to in some of the women I've dated over
the years. That is one of the many reasons I like women in the 21 - 25
age group, they want to have fun and experience life without all of
the complications of settling down. Who says you can't have your cake
and eat it too?

: Ever notice, (generally speaking) 45 year-old men are attractive to


: women, but not so much the other way around.

Something for which I'm continually thankful... Nothing
quite like meeting an old high-school flame and realizing - "She's
too old for me." Of course it's very individual - I've met some 50
year old that look a heck of a lot better then their daughters - and
they are a lot more fun too.

: In other words,


: men who get spastic over feminism, are basically wasting alot of good
: energy.

Yep... Just enjoy all of the advantages you've got.

Chuckk Hubbard

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 1:11:18 AM6/30/03
to
"Sue" <SBot...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3e1a6306.03062...@posting.google.com...

> "Michael Snyder" <msn...@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:<gzjLa.6451$%3.29...@typhoon.sonic.net>...
> > Sue wrote in message <3e1a6306.0306...@posting.google.com>...
> > >My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...

> > >In other words,


> > >men who get spastic over feminism, are basically wasting alot of good
> > >energy.

I don't know about that. Getting spastic about social injustice sometimes
forces it to be addressed.

> >
> > No more than are women who get spastic about misogyny/chauvinism/
> > sexism/whatever. And far less than are women who get spastic about
> > being called the wrong name during a CASUAL sex encounter!
>
> Any woman who settles for "casual" sex, evidently doesn't have much
> respect for herself.

Or perhaps more respect for herself than for the notion that has been pushed
on her every day of her life that she *shouldn't* enjoy casual sex.
I know men often do call women sluts, but in my own experience it is far,
far more common for women to use the word.

-Chuckk

Chuckk Hubbard

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 1:16:41 AM6/30/03
to
"Sue" <SBot...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3e1a6306.0306...@posting.google.com...

This is true sometimes, just as working class women with beat-up old VW
Golfs can be attractive to men, but not so much the other way around.

-Chuckk


Sue

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 9:22:01 AM6/30/03
to
Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3effb...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...

> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> : Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
> : but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
> : words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
> : attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.
>
> <snicker> Yes - around 27-29 is when ye-olde clock starts
> getting noticeable - or seems to in some of the women I've dated over
> the years. That is one of the many reasons I like women in the 21 - 25
> age group, they want to have fun and experience life without all of
> the complications of settling down.

Or, could it simply be, these hot-babes aren't interested in settling
down with YOU? :)

>Who says you can't have your cake
> and eat it too?

Then, when you get a tummy-ache, the rest of us are supposed to drop
everything and come running with the tums (clap medicine, welfare
payments).


>
> : Ever notice, (generally speaking) 45 year-old men are attractive to
> : women, but not so much the other way around.
>
> Something for which I'm continually thankful... Nothing
> quite like meeting an old high-school flame and realizing - "She's
> too old for me." Of course it's very individual - I've met some 50
> year old that look a heck of a lot better then their daughters - and
> they are a lot more fun too.
>
> : In other words,
> : men who get spastic over feminism, are basically wasting alot of good
> : energy.
>
> Yep... Just enjoy all of the advantages you've got.

Ooopps, sounds like another guy who resents chicks, because when we
play our cards right, we DO end up with "advantages."

Have a nice day :)

Turin

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 11:43:59 AM6/30/03
to
"Chuckk Hubbard" <chu...@paonline.com> wrote in message news:<bdogpj$v24j5$1...@ID-52446.news.dfncis.de>...


It's also far more common for men to use it toward unhappy stay at
home feminists - like cry-baby Botchie - who find a million ways
beyond marriage to charge them for sex.

....In most men's minds, today's redundant housewife is the real slut,
and the woman who engages in no-strings attached mutual sex for it's
own sake is the genuine self-respecting, and honorable woman.


...and they're RIGHT, too.


- - -

This has been another word of wisdom, with:

Michael Snyder

unread,
Jun 30, 2003, 2:15:20 PM6/30/03
to

Sue wrote in message <3e1a6306.03063...@posting.google.com>...

>Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3effb...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...
>> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>> : Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
>> : but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
>> : words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
>> : attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.
>>
>> <snicker> Yes - around 27-29 is when ye-olde clock starts
>> getting noticeable - or seems to in some of the women I've dated over
>> the years. That is one of the many reasons I like women in the 21 - 25
>> age group, they want to have fun and experience life without all of
>> the complications of settling down.
>
>Or, could it simply be, these hot-babes aren't interested in settling
>down with YOU? :)

Predictable as clock-work -- say anything critical about women's
sexual choices and behaviors, and have your own sexuality denigrated.

Adventuro...@comcast.net

unread,
Jul 1, 2003, 2:45:02 AM7/1/03
to
In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
: Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3effb...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...

:> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
:>
:> : Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
:> : but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
:> : words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
:> : attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.
:>
:> <snicker> Yes - around 27-29 is when ye-olde clock starts
:> getting noticeable - or seems to in some of the women I've dated over
:> the years. That is one of the many reasons I like women in the 21 - 25
:> age group, they want to have fun and experience life without all of
:> the complications of settling down.

: Or, could it simply be, these hot-babes aren't interested in settling
: down with YOU? :)

Possibly, but that's just fine with me. :) They seem to enjoy
passing the time with me - that's all that matters. To limit myself to
just one, would break so many hearts... <snicker>

:>Who says you can't have your cake
:> and eat it too?

: Then, when you get a tummy-ache, the rest of us are supposed to drop
: everything and come running with the tums (clap medicine, welfare
: payments).

Perhaps that is what you are looking for, but not everyone
wants the things that you seem to put such value in. No
thanks... Actually, if I were to get sick with anything nasty, I'd
be set for life with all of the insurance and disability my company
provides. Capitalism - the best system on the face of the planet. ;)

:> : In other words,


:> : men who get spastic over feminism, are basically wasting alot of good
:> : energy.
:>
:> Yep... Just enjoy all of the advantages you've got.

: Ooopps, sounds like another guy who resents chicks, because when we
: play our cards right, we DO end up with "advantages."

I think you misunderstood. Life is a mating dance, with each
sex given certain advantages and disadvantages. Unfortunately, many of
the men in this group seem completely unable to see the many
advantages that they have. (Women are well aware of the advantages
that they have and they use them, oh so well, when they want to.) If some
of the more bitter men can open their eyes to just a few of the more
obvious possiblitilies maybe they won't resent women so much and might
release some of the anger they have pent up inside.

Personally, I love women - I would be bored to death without
them. I love how they pout to get their way and how appreciative they
can be when you finally give in on the little things that benefit you
anyway. Mmmmmmm....

Don't look for bitterness and resentment where there is
none. Life is too full of beauty to cloud it with such negative
energy. So smile and enjoy life - it's best experienced up close and
personal.

: Have a nice day :)

I always do. And I have even better nights - which is why
I'm up at 3am having just gotten in. :) Of course tomorrow may be a
little rocky since I have to meet with a client early... Thank heavens
for black coffee.


Chuckk Hubbard

unread,
Jul 1, 2003, 3:51:08 AM7/1/03
to
"My Liege" <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77...
> Ok, so tonight I went to a party and as I'm enjoying a martini for being
> dirty and not too dry I have the good fortune to meet a woman who also
> possesses those qualities. The conversation somehow veers to a discussion
> about the effects of consumption of various drinks and its potential
> relationship to the flavor of the drinkers semen. So we go to her place
> to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
> kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."

Maybe she didn't want to find out what Jill tastes like.

-Chuckk

Sue

unread,
Jul 1, 2003, 7:29:59 AM7/1/03
to
Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3f012...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...

> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
> : Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3effb...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...
> :> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> : Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
> :> : but (like my Husband says) "you can't stop the clock!" In other
> :> : words, if that (let's say) 23 year old sex-nazi doesn't change her
> :> : attitude, the aging process (just a few years away) will begin to.
> :>
> :> <snicker> Yes - around 27-29 is when ye-olde clock starts
> :> getting noticeable - or seems to in some of the women I've dated over
> :> the years. That is one of the many reasons I like women in the 21 - 25
> :> age group, they want to have fun and experience life without all of
> :> the complications of settling down.
>
> : Or, could it simply be, these hot-babes aren't interested in settling
> : down with YOU? :)
>
> Possibly, but that's just fine with me. :) They seem to enjoy
> passing the time with me - that's all that matters. To limit myself to
> just one, would break so many hearts... <snicker>
>
Guess as long as you don't mind the probability of also being used.

> :>Who says you can't have your cake
> :> and eat it too?
>
> : Then, when you get a tummy-ache, the rest of us are supposed to drop
> : everything and come running with the tums (clap medicine, welfare
> : payments).
>
> Perhaps that is what you are

wishing I was

>looking for, but not everyone
> wants the things that you seem to put such value in.

How true :) The "human zoo" is full of residents who simply want to
party and hump.

>No
> thanks... Actually, if I were to get sick with anything nasty, I'd
> be set for life with all of the insurance and disability my company
> provides.

Are you sure (or simply indulging in yet another fantasy)?

Sue

unread,
Jul 1, 2003, 7:36:04 AM7/1/03
to
Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3f012...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...

> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
> : Adventuro...@comcast.net wrote in message news:<3effb...@corp-news.newsgroups.com>...
> :> In alt.romance Sue <SBot...@aol.com> wrote:
> :>
> :> : Men can rant about child support, and various other forms of misandry,
> [snip]

>
> I always do. And I have even better nights - which is why
> I'm up at 3am having just gotten in. :) Of course tomorrow may be a
> little rocky since I have to meet with a client early... Thank heavens
> for black coffee.

Why are you telling me this (too much information :) ?

My Liege

unread,
Jul 2, 2003, 11:17:49 PM7/2/03
to
neilk...@hotmail.com (Neil) wrote in
news:daa8d05c.03062...@posting.google.com:

> My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...
>> Ok, so tonight I went to a party and as I'm enjoying a martini for
>> being dirty and not too dry I have the good fortune to meet a woman
>> who also possesses those qualities. The conversation somehow veers to
>> a discussion about the effects of consumption of various drinks and
>> its potential relationship to the flavor of the drinkers semen. So we
>> go to her place to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're
>> a really good kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."
>
> You don't even know her name and she obviously isn't all that
> interested in having sex with you, but that makes her a "nazi"? Don't
> be silly.

Apparently you don't subscribe to the idea that one can make likely
guesses through induction. There aren't any living nazis who's names I do
know, nor any who are interested in having sex with me of which I'm
aware, but I'm sure you'll dismiss it as all just a crazy coincidence.

We can't call her a nazi because I don't know her name and she didn't
have sex with me... next you'll be trying to justify the swastika flag on
her bedroom wall or her habit of calling out "Heil Hitler" every few
minutes.


>
> (snip)
>
>> Well, a few minutes later I'm driving home wondering what just
>> happened. I mean, I didn't mean anything to this girl, whoever she
>> was, and it was pretty obvious she just wanted a physical encounter
>> with me
>
> If she really wanted to have sex with you, she would've. She didn't.


Why do you suspect she invited me to her place at 2am?


>
>>a few years ago the TV sit-com Seinfeld
>> had a famous episode
>
> If you're going to refer to fiction to back up your calling a woman
> you don't know a "nazi," you're pretty desperate.


Our disagreement seems to be one of semantics. You say tomato, I say "to-
mah-to". You say "power-mad hypersensitive self-ordained champion of anal
retentive women everywhere", I say "sex nazi".


> At least you could
> refer to the Seinfeld episode where the guy never learns the woman's
> name and she dumps him, but of course that's fictional too.


And bares very little resemblance to the events that occurred.


>
>>involving a soup kitchen that made excellent soup
>> based on one that supposedly really does exist in New York City. The
>> way it worked was if a customer veered out of line too far, didn't
>> face straight ahead and speak in monotone while ordering, or if they
>> questioned anything about the menu the owner of the place would be so
>> offended he would yell "No soup for you!" and refuse to do business
>> with them. Because of his antics, the characters in the show referred
>> to him as the soup nazi, however his soup was so good that they
>> wanted it enough they were willing to put up with all his rules in
>> order to get some.
>
> Well, that's fiction, and it's just a joke, right?


Whereas my post was very serious and might lead to the creation of new
laws.


> And some people
> would consider sex more intimate,important, and personal than some
> fictional soup in a silly TV comedy.


I agree, which is why I expected this intimate encounter to lead to a
deep and eternal romance in which we were destined to marry and share our
lives under an umbrella of endless love. Certainly nobody who valued the
intimacy as much as I would have thrown it away over a trivial faux pas
made by their future spouse.


> YMMV.


My bovine to English translator seems to be broken.


>
> Anyway, if some woman doesn't want to have sex with you, all it means
> is that she doesn't want to have sex with you, that's all.


You're right, she probably is a lesbian.


> In a way,
> she's doing you a favor, because she's freed you to find somebody more
> attracted to you.


Not to mention the immense sexual pleasure she sacrificed in order to do
me this favor.


>
> So you didn't get your way, so what? Move on. Don't attack some woman


Attack? Nay. I was discussing my feelings with some friends in order to
help me cope with having my dreams of marital bliss dashed upon the rocks
like that. In fact in order to protect this woman I have chosen not to
post her name, because that's the chivalrous kind of man I am.


> you don't even know just because she didn't want to have sex with you.


I was also kinda mad when she tried to get me to go "hunt Jews" with her.


> That's not going to help you find somebody more interested in you. So
> turn off the PC and get out there and try to meet some new women.

You're right. My political correctness has probably kept me from meeting
quality women. Any other advice for the guys at alt.seduction.fast while
you're at it?

My Liege

unread,
Jul 2, 2003, 11:26:35 PM7/2/03
to
turin...@yahoo.com (Turin) wrote in
news:62178907.03062...@posting.google.com:

> And you think this was all because she had some kind of problem, and
> not at all because you were using slimy bullshit


I've never actually tried slimy bullshit, it would seem too smelly for my
tastes. I prefer to use slimy lime Jello. But I didn't have any with me
at the time, honest.


> which made her party
> to an insult against her own intelligence?


You find your penis to be offensive don't you? Its okay, you can admit
it, I'm here to help. Its better for you to deal with your shame than to
try and change those of us who know that intelligent women DO like our
penises into company for your misery.

My Liege

unread,
Jul 2, 2003, 11:37:43 PM7/2/03
to
psyber...@uymail.com (PsyberZombie) wrote in
news:f8f72cef.03062...@posting.google.com:

> My Liege <Hombr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:<Xns93A829B5C2ED5H...@216.148.227.77>...
>
>> So we go to her place
>> to do a little research, and I say "Wow, Jill you're a really good
>> kisser" to which she replies "Um, my name's not Jill."
>>
>>
>> That's how it works with sex nazis. These women have a large set of
>> strict rules that if you break they become offended and next thing
>> you know you're at home sending money to Danimal to help speed up
>> development of his sex robots.
>
>»» " That's how it works with ** THESE ** Women " ???
>
> That's How it Works with ** ALL ** WOMEN


Not necessarily. I've noticed that a good recommendation from a friend
who's slept with me can go a long ways towards stopping the gestapo
tactics.

> , Masturb·VIII
> !!!


All good lovers masturbate regularly. Do you?


>
> PSYBER·ZOMBIE'S RULE # ONE is =
>
> Do NOT Call the Woman Yer Trying To Nail By The WRONG NAME !!!!


Now he tells me!


>
>
> You VIOLATED that Rule
>
> ... and were LUCKY she didn't bash your head in with her Vibrator
> !!!
>
>
> Oh, Well .... Live and Learn , i always say !!


You should write a book.

Chris

unread,
Jul 3, 2003, 12:34:56 AM7/3/03
to
I'd call good ol' Ray a "Nazi", but given the context, there's NOTHING the
poor loser does that someone would withstand his attitude in order to get.

Good ol' Ray, "inexcusable failure" even at being a Nazi.

Wait!!

Ray, the Inexcusable Failure Nazi!

Royston Vasey

unread,
Jul 9, 2003, 2:15:47 PM7/9/03
to
SBot...@aol.com (Sue) wrote in
news:3e1a6306.03070...@posting.google.com:

> How true :) The "human zoo" is full of residents who simply want to
> party and hump.
>

A repeat of your "how true".
However, Sue, there are also a reasonably large group of men out here who
truly love being with women, who appreciate them for their feminine
qualities, who like spending time with women, yet who do not want to marry
any of them.
I like women enough that I can see absolutely no reason for limiting myself
to being with only one of them.
A lot of the posts I see in a.s.f are from men who don't really like women,
just want to have sex with them. But these are usually just the most vocal
(wait, since they're not talking but are posting does that mean they're the
most 'postal'?) people here, they don't make up the majority.
I'll bet you aren't the kind of woman who believes it's possible to have an
entire relationship within a five hour period.
A normal relationship takes place over a time of months to years.
In a five hour relationship you can have everything that a longer term
relationship has, they're just felt more intensely. You have the discovery
phase where you're learning about the interests and likes you have in
common. You have the comfort phase where you learn to trust the person and
relax with them. Then you have the sex, which is all the more intense
because both of you know that you have to put months or years of pleasure
into a few hours. Then you have the regret phase - not the regret that this
has happened but the regret that this has to end because you are both
moving on to other things in your life.
***
Make a pattern based on that one, guys. I am.
***
Just because someone does not want to use months of time and loads of $$
before they bed you, Sue, does not mean that they cannot appreciate you and
possibly even love you, for however short a time. I have appreciated and,
sometimes, even loved every woman I've had sex with in the last 20 years. I
have just never felt the need to stake a permanent claim on them nor allow
them to do that to me.

RV

Turin

unread,
Jul 9, 2003, 9:12:18 PM7/9/03
to
This guy is basically another male feminist taking the moderate
approach of pandering to women as though it's new and novel.

I can appreciate the sexually open lifestyle, but not the phony lines
or calculated emotionalism employed in getting from Point A to Point
B....


- - -

This has been another enlightening moment, with:

Turin

"He who changeth, altereth, misconstrueth, argueth with, deleteth, or
maketh a lie about these words or causeth them to not be known shall
burn in hell forever and ever...."

-----


Royston Vasey <no...@here.now> wrote in message news:<Xns93B37083A...@63.240.76.16>...

Royston Vasey

unread,
Jul 10, 2003, 3:42:11 PM7/10/03
to
turin...@yahoo.com (Turin) wrote in
news:62178907.03070...@posting.google.com:

> This guy is basically another male feminist taking the moderate
> approach of pandering to women as though it's new and novel.
>
> I can appreciate the sexually open lifestyle, but not the phony lines
> or calculated emotionalism employed in getting from Point A to Point
> B....
>

So you're saying that if a man likes women he's a male feminist?
That is a rather strange attitude.

RV

0 new messages