Skip to first unread message


Feb 1, 2022, 4:11:08 PM2/1/22

they are implementing New World Order.

Read this Author's books "DEEP STATE DEFECTOR" series.

Deep State, Illuminati, Syndicate, Free Masons or whatever shit they
call themselves is 100% REAL. It is NOT a conspiracy theory.

EVIL Deep State's NWO is to NEURALLY ENSLAVE every human on this planet,
like Whistleblower BRYAN KOFRON said in his EXPOSE VIDEOS.

The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS
Gang-Stalking Program

Rahul D Manchanda ESQ

In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional
inquiry into the egregious human rights and civil liberties violations
of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), National Security Agency
(“NSA”), as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) against
people both foreign and domestic. Such blatant transgressions included
the “neutralization” and “elimination” of political dissidents, “enemies
of the state,” real or imagined threats to National Security, and anyone
else on the proverbial shit list of the Military Industrial Complex (“MIC”).

The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to
Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a
U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A
precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the
committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the
aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been revealed by
the Watergate affair.

Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI
sending letters to Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself
or else they would tell the world about his sexual proclivities; (2) the
planned or successful assassinations of foreign leaders such as Fidel
Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American, Middle
Eastern or Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire
foreign economies if they democratically elected someone at odds with
the elite power structure deep state of the United States such as what
occurred against Salvatore Allende of Guatemala; (4) the possible
assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations of Christopher Pyle in
January 1970 of the U.S. Army’s spying on the civilian population; (6)
the December 22, 1974 New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing
operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the
“family jewels,” involving covert action programs involving
assassination attempts against foreign leaders and covert attempts to
subvert foreign governments were reported for the first time; (7)
efforts by intelligence agencies to collect information on the political
activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both
overseas and domestically.

The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning
on CIA assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking
programs. In 1975 and 1976, the Church Committee published fourteen
reports on various U.S. intelligence agencies’ formation, operations,
and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they had committed, with
recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in place.

Among the other matters investigated were attempts to assassinate other
foreign leaders such as Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the
Diem brothers of Vietnam, Gen. René Schneider of Chile, and Director of
CIA Allen Dulles’s plan (approved by President Dwight Eisenhower) to use
the Sicilian Mafia to kill Fidel Castro of Cuba.

Under recommendations and pressure by this committee, President Gerald
Ford issued Executive Order 11905 (ultimately replaced in 1981 by
President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333) to ban U.S. sanctioned
assassinations of foreign leaders.

Together, the Church Committee’s reports have been said to constitute
the most extensive review of intelligence activities ever made available
to the public. Much of the contents were classified, but over 50,000
pages were declassified under the President John F. Kennedy
Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992.

The Church Committee learned that beginning in the 1950s, the CIA and
FBI intercepted, opened, and photographed more than 215,000 pieces of
mail by the time the program was shut down. The Church report found that
the CIA was zealous about keeping the US Postal Service from learning
that mail was being opened by government agents. CIA agents moved mail
to a private room to open the mail or in some cases opened envelopes at
night after stuffing them in briefcases or coat pockets to deceive
postal officials.

On May 9, 1975, the Church Committee called CIA director William Colby.
That same day Ford’s top advisers (Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld,
Philip W. Buchen, and John Marsh) drafted a recommendation that Colby be
authorized to brief only rather than testify, and that he would be told
to discuss only the general subject, with details of specific covert
actions to be avoided except for realistic hypotheticals. But the Church
Committee had full authority to call a hearing and require Colby’s
testimony. Ford and his top advisers met with Colby to prepare him for
the hearing.

The Ford administration, particularly Rumsfeld, was “concerned” about
the effort by members of the Church Committee in the Senate and the Pike
Committee in the House to curtail the power of U.S. intelligence
agencies. It seemed that Rumsfeld et al was comfortable giving the power
to arbitrarily destroy anyone as “enemies of the state” by anyone
working in the IC and MIC.

COINTELPRO (COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert and
illegal projects conducted by the FBI aimed at surveilling,
infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic “political dissidents.”

FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and
individuals that the FBI deemed subversive, including anti Vietnam War
organizers, activists of the Civil Rights Movement or Black Power
movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party),
feminist organizations, anti colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican
independence groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of
organizations that were part of the broader New Left.

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives on COINTELPRO, ordering
FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or
otherwise eliminate” the activities of these movements and especially
their leaders. Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO was
William C. Sullivan.

Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of
documents that would divide their targets internally.

After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled
out King as a major target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to
focus on King, Sullivan wrote: “In the light of King’s powerful
demagogic speech, we must mark him now, if we have not done so before,
as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the
standpoint of communism, the Negro, and national security.”

The Final Report of the Select Frank Church Committee blasted the
behavior of the intelligence community in its domestic operations
(including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:

“The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence
community at times violated specific statutory prohibitions and
infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered.
On other occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief
that because the programs served the “national security” the law did not
apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to
their superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality,
the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those of
senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence
activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law. Many
of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even
if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but
COINTELPRO went far beyond that – the Bureau conducted a sophisticated
vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First
Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that
preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of
dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.”

According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used
four main methods during COINTELPRO:

(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political
activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very
presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters.
The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents;

(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad “dirty tricks”
to undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and
published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted
groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made
anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and
events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and
manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords, school
officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad
jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with
lethal consequences;

(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal
system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals.
Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated
evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and
used conspicuous surveillance, “investigative” interviews, and grand
jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their

(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to
threaten dissidents; to conduct illegal break ins in order to search
dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults, beatings and
assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and
disrupt their movements.

The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and
hostility between various factions in their targeted groups and
individuals, and this resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San
Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and
Sylvester Bell.

While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege
that continuing FBI actions indicate that post COINTELPRO reforms did
not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.


“Community Oriented Policing,” (“COPS”) is a strategy of policing that
focuses on police “building ties and working closely with members of the
communities,” and originated in 1994 when then Senator Joseph Biden
wrote and then President Bill Clinton enacted the Violent Crime Control
and Law Enforcement Act (“VCCLEA”) establishing the Office of Community
Oriented Policing Services (“COPS”) within the US Department of Justice.

Community policing is supposedly a policy that requires police to engage
in a “proactive approach” to address public safety concerns, and is a
cornerstone of the Clinton Administration, gaining its funding from the
1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.

Common implementations of community policing include: (1) relying on
community based crime prevention by utilizing “civilian education,”
neighborhood watch, and a variety of other techniques, as opposed to
relying solely on police patrols; (2) restructuring the patrol from an
emergency response based system to emphasizing proactive techniques such
as foot patrol; (3) increased officer accountability to civilians they
are “supposed to serve;” and (4) decentralizing police authority,
allowing more discretion amongst lower ranking officers, and more
initiative expected from them.

In other words, federal and state sanctioned and approved GANG-STALKING.

Gang Stalking has been described as fascism, using East Germany style
“Stasi Tactics,” a systemic form of control, which seeks to control
every aspect of a “Targeted Individual’s” life. Gang Stalking has many
similarities to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the
community, where the target is followed around and placed under
surveillance by groups of organized civilian spies/snitches 24/7, 365
days a year. Targeted Individuals are harassed in this way for months or
years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized
program of gang-stalking harassment. This is very similar to what
happened to many innocent individuals in the former East Germany or
activists and dissidents in the former Soviet Union. Many innocent
people in the former East Germany would be targeted for these harassment
programs, and then their friends, family, and the community at large
would be used to monitor, prosecute, and harass them. In the former USSR
it was used by the state to target activists, political dissidents, or
anyone that the Secret Police thought was an “enemy of the state,” or as
“mentally unfit,” and many were institutionalized or murdered using this
form of systematic control.

In Bill Clinton’s COPS Gang-Stalking Program, civilian spies are
recruited from every segment of society, and everyone in the “targets”
life is made a part of this ongoing, continuous, and systematic form of
control and harassment, with such actions that are specifically designed
to control the target and to “keep them in line,” like a Pavlovian Dog.
These actions are also designed to mentally, physically, emotionally,
spiritually, financially, socially, and psychologically destroy the
target over years, to make them appear to be crazy, and leave them with
no form of support, whatsoever.

For the targets of this harassment, COPS Gang Stalking is experienced as
a covert psychological, emotional and physical attack that is capable of
immobilizing and destroying a target over time. For the state, it is a
way to keep their targets in line, control them, or ultimately destroy them.

This modern day systematic form of control is funded at the highest
levels of government, just like it has in other societies where these
similar types of harassment programs have been implemented.

Targets can be chosen for many reasons: (1) political views; (2) whistle
blowing; (3) political dissidence; (4) asserting rights at work; (5)
making the wrong enemy; (6) too outspoken; (7) investigating something
that the state does not want investigated; (8) signing a petition; (9)
writing a letter; (10) being “suspicious” by a civilian spy/snitch; or
(11) being a religious/ethnic/racial minority.

The goal of the COPS state sanctioned organized gang-stalking program is
to isolate the target from all forms of support, so that the target can
be set up in the future for arrest, institutionalized, or forced
suicide. Other goals of this harassment are to destroy the targets
reputation and credibility, and to make the target look “crazy” or unstable.

The process often involves sensitizing the target to every day stimuli’s
as a form of control, which is used to control targets when they “get
out of line.” Targets of this harassment become vulnerable and
destitute, and often become homeless, jobless, have a breakdown, are
driven to suicide, similar to targets of the banned COINTELPRO. The
government eliminates perceived “enemies of the state” in this manner.

When a target moves or changes jobs, the harassment continues.

Every time the target moves, the same defamation, lies, libel, and
slander will be spread, and the systematic harassment will continue.
Online defamation, libel, and slander on the internet has made this
continuation of COPS gang-stalking a great deal easier.

People from all segments of society can be recruited to be the “eyes and
ears” of the state, such as laborers, drug dealers, drug users, street
people, prostitutes, punks, church groups, youth groups, your best
friend, your lawyer, local policeman, doctor, emergency services, a
neighbor, family, social workers, politicians, judges, dentists, vet,
supermarket cashier, postman, religious leader, care worker, landlord,

Most of these recruited civilian spies/snitches do not understand or
even care that the end consequence of this harassment protocol is to
eventually destroy the targeted person, and function as “useful idiots”
of the state sanctioned COPS gang-stalking program.

It has been reported that people participate in this COPS gang stalking
because it: (1) gives them a sense of power; (2) is a way to make
friends; (3) is something social and fun; (4) breaks down
race/gender/age/social barriers; (5) is forced or blackmailed upon them
by the State or police to take part; (6) is told to them that they are
part of “homeland or national security” to help keep an eye on
“dangerous” or “emotionally disturbed” individuals where they are
“heroic spies for the state;” (7) is used on local thugs or informants
who are already being used for other activities where their energies are
diverted into these COPS gangstalking community spy programs; (8) is
either a choice of spying for the State or police, or else go to jail;
(9) involves outright lies and slander about the target to get them to
go along with ruining the targets life; (10) includes average citizens
recruited by the state the same way citizens were recruited in the
former East Germany and other countries.

Some techniques used against targets in this organized COPS
Gang-stalking program include: (1) classic conditioning where a target
is sensitized to everyday stimuli over a period of months and years to
harass them in public to let them know they are constantly being
harassed and monitored; (2) 24/7 Surveillance following the target
everywhere they go, learning about the target and where they shop, work,
play, who their friends and family are, getting close to the target,
moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the
street, monitoring the targets phone, house, and computer activity; (3)
isolating the target via defamation, libel, and slander campaigns, (eg,
people in the target’s community are told that the target is a thief,
into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something,
needs to be watched, false files will even be produced on the target,
shown to neighbors, family, store keepers); (4) constant or intermittent
noise and mimicking campaigns disrupting the targets life and sleep with
loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc; (5)
talking in public about private things in the target’s life; (6)
mimicking actions of the target and basically letting the target know
that they are in the target’s life; (7) daily interferences, not too
overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and damaging
to the target over time; (8) everyday life breaks and street theater
such as flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on
targets property; (9) mass strangers doing things in public to annoy
targets such as getting called/text messages to be at a specific time
and place to perform a specific action; (10) blocking targets path,
getting ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road,
saying or doing things to elicit a response from the target; (11)
“baiting” tactics where a surveillance operation can selectively capture
evidence of a targeted person responding to harassment, and then that
evidence could then be used to justify the initiation of more formal
scrutiny by a government agency.

The COPS Gang-Stalking Program, as all other state sanctioned/approved
gang-stalking programs, have always been funded by the Government. They
are the only ones with enough money, coordination, and power to keep
such a system in place. These coordinated efforts then join hands with
others for this systemic form of control and harassment.

Such operations have nothing to do with the target’s criminality – they
are led and perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security
contractors, often with the support of state and local law enforcement
personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are often private
investigators and vigilantes – including many former agents and police
officers, sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with
connections to the public and private elements of America’s security

The goal of such operations is “disruption” of the life of an individual
deemed to be an enemy (or potential enemy) of clients or members of the
security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for this form of
harassment would be “counterintelligence stalking.”

Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to this
process as Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a
reference to the severe psychological, social, and financial effects
upon the victim). Victims have described the process as “no touch
torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime:
cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally,
because it generates minimal forensic evidence.

Tactics include online and personal slander, libel, defamation,
blacklisting, “mobbing” (intense, organized harassment in public),
“black bag jobs” (residential break ins), abusive phone calls, computer
hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street theater”
(staged physical and verbal interactions with the minions of the people
who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of

Such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal
agencies; however such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for
personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees
of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and
their clients.

Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into
the realm of psychological terrorism, as it is essentially a form of
extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal – even when
done by the government. It clearly violates the US Constitution’s Fourth
Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment
which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate
similar fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is
also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in

As was stated above, organized stalking methods were used extensively by
communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) as a means of maintaining
political control over its citizens. Although this is supposedly illegal
in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly used by America’s local
and federal law enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to suppress
political and domestic dissent, silence whistle blowers, and get revenge
against persons who have angered someone with connections to the public
and private agencies involved.

Although Edward Snowden’s revelations about the National Security Agency
(“NSA”) in 2013 and 2014 generated a great deal of public discussion
about mass surveillance, US domestic counterintelligence activities such
as the COPS Program receive relatively little attention.

The FBI’s COINTELPRO operation is still happening, involving even more
advanced surveillance technology – and this program is none other than
Joseph Biden and Bill Clinton’s COPS Program.

US Department of Justice crime statistics from a 2006 survey indicated
that an estimated 445,220 COPS gangstalking victims reported three or
more perpetrators (the only ones reported), and this number is growing
exponentially on a daily basis.

In addition to being morally reprehensible, the COPS gang stalking
program, just like the original version of the FBI’s COINTELPRO
operations, is very, very illegal. It violates criminal laws in all
fifty states against stalking, as well as grossly violates the US
Constitution’s prohibitions against warrantless searches and extra
judicial punishment.

While the vast majority of Americans are never personally targeted by
the Joseph Biden/Bill Clinton COPS gangstalking program, they should
still be concerned about the existence of such operations.

Even if such activities were constitutionally legitimate (which they are
not), they still have an enormous potential for abuse as a personal or
political weapon by enemies currently employed or friendly with these
governmental institutions.

Ending this cowardly and illegal practice by law enforcement agencies,
intelligence agencies, and their parasitic corporate and individual
recruits will first require exposing what is happening, to the public.

Reply all
Reply to author
0 new messages