On 2/1/2022 10:41 AM, LORENZO PIACENTINI LAZARD GRAN LOGGIA SVIZZERA wrote:
> #PIERSILVIOBERLUSCONI É FIGLIO DI PUTTANA! SI,  PROPRIO COSÍ! É UN FIGLIO DI TROIA, PIERSILVIO BERLUSCONI DI CRIMINALE #MFE, CRIMINALE #MEDIAFOREUROPE, CRIMINALE #MEDIASET ALIAS #MAFIASET (FIGLIO DI PUTTANA E FIGLIO DI PEDOFILO MACELLA MAGISTRATI....... #SILVIOBERLUSCONI)! RICICLA MONTAGNE DI CASH MAFIOSO! COME HA FATTO SUO PEZZO DI MERDA NONNO #LUIGIBERLUSCONI IN #BANCARASINI! E COME HA FATTO PER MEZZO SECOLO, IL LECCA FIGHE DI BAMBINE E RAGAZZINE, BASTARDO STRAGISTA, FIGLIO, MARITO E PADRE DI PUTTANE: #SILVIOBERLUSCONI! SOLDI ASSASSINI, ESATTAMENTE DI #COSANOSTRA, #CAMORRA, #NDRANGHETA, #SACRACORONAUNITA, #SOCIETAFOGGIANA, #MAFIA RUSSA, MAFIA CINESE, MAFIA COLOMBIANA, MAFIA MESSICANA, MAFIA MAROCCHINA, MAFIA ALBANESE, MAFIA SLAVA, MAFIA RUMENA, MAFIE DI TUTTO IL
Former DEEP STATE DEFECTOR REVEALS the EVIL DEEP STATE programs and how 
they are implementing New World Order.
Read this Author's books "DEEP STATE DEFECTOR" series.
Deep State, Illuminati, Syndicate, Free Masons or whatever shit they 
call themselves is 100% REAL. It is NOT a conspiracy theory.
EVIL Deep State's NWO is to NEURALLY ENSLAVE every human on this planet, 
like Whistleblower BRYAN KOFRON said in his EXPOSE VIDEOS.
https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2016/08/22/the-surreptitious-reincarnation-of-cointelpro-with-the-cops-gang-stalking-program/
The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS 
Gang-Stalking Program
Rahul D Manchanda ESQ
In 1975 Senator Frank Church convened a joint senatorial/congressional 
inquiry into the egregious human rights and civil liberties violations 
of the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), National Security Agency 
(“NSA”), as well as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) against 
people both foreign and domestic. Such blatant transgressions included 
the “neutralization” and “elimination” of political dissidents, “enemies 
of the state,” real or imagined threats to National Security, and anyone 
else on the proverbial shit list of the Military Industrial Complex (“MIC”).
The Church Committee was the United States Senate Select Committee to 
Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, a 
U.S. Senate committee chaired by Senator Frank Church (D ID) in 1975. A 
precursor to the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, the 
committee investigated intelligence gathering for illegality by the 
aforementioned agencies after certain activities had been revealed by 
the Watergate affair.
Some famous examples which have since emerged include: (1) the FBI 
sending letters to Martin Luther King Jr encouraging him to kill himself 
or else they would tell the world about his sexual proclivities; (2) the 
planned or successful assassinations of foreign leaders such as Fidel 
Castro, Patrice Lumumba, and countless other South American, Middle 
Eastern or Asian leaders; (3) the wholesale undermining of entire 
foreign economies if they democratically elected someone at odds with 
the elite power structure deep state of the United States such as what 
occurred against Salvatore Allende of Guatemala; (4) the possible 
assassination of John F Kennedy; (5) revelations of Christopher Pyle in 
January 1970 of the U.S. Army’s spying on the civilian population; (6) 
the December 22, 1974 New York Times article by Seymour Hersh detailing 
operations engaged in by the CIA over the years that had been dubbed the 
“family jewels,” involving covert action programs involving 
assassination attempts against foreign leaders and covert attempts to 
subvert foreign governments were reported for the first time; (7) 
efforts by intelligence agencies to collect information on the political 
activities of US citizens; and (8) countless other examples, both 
overseas and domestically.
The end result of the Church Committee Hearings was the outright banning 
on CIA assassinations as well as the FBI/DOJ COINTELPRO gang-stalking 
programs. In 1975 and 1976, the Church Committee published fourteen 
reports on various U.S. intelligence agencies’ formation, operations, 
and the alleged abuses of law and of power that they had committed, with 
recommendations for reform, some of which were later put in place.
Among the other matters investigated were attempts to assassinate other 
foreign leaders such as Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the 
Diem brothers of Vietnam, Gen. René Schneider of Chile, and Director of 
CIA Allen Dulles’s plan (approved by President Dwight Eisenhower) to use 
the Sicilian Mafia to kill Fidel Castro of Cuba.
Under recommendations and pressure by this committee, President Gerald 
Ford issued Executive Order 11905 (ultimately replaced in 1981 by 
President Reagan’s Executive Order 12333) to ban U.S. sanctioned 
assassinations of foreign leaders.
Together, the Church Committee’s reports have been said to constitute 
the most extensive review of intelligence activities ever made available 
to the public. Much of the contents were classified, but over 50,000 
pages were declassified under the President John F. Kennedy 
Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992.
The Church Committee learned that beginning in the 1950s, the CIA and 
FBI intercepted, opened, and photographed more than 215,000 pieces of 
mail by the time the program was shut down. The Church report found that 
the CIA was zealous about keeping the US Postal Service from learning 
that mail was being opened by government agents. CIA agents moved mail 
to a private room to open the mail or in some cases opened envelopes at 
night after stuffing them in briefcases or coat pockets to deceive 
postal officials.
On May 9, 1975, the Church Committee called CIA director William Colby. 
That same day Ford’s top advisers (Henry Kissinger, Donald Rumsfeld, 
Philip W. Buchen, and John Marsh) drafted a recommendation that Colby be 
authorized to brief only rather than testify, and that he would be told 
to discuss only the general subject, with details of specific covert 
actions to be avoided except for realistic hypotheticals. But the Church 
Committee had full authority to call a hearing and require Colby’s 
testimony. Ford and his top advisers met with Colby to prepare him for 
the hearing.
The Ford administration, particularly Rumsfeld, was “concerned” about 
the effort by members of the Church Committee in the Senate and the Pike 
Committee in the House to curtail the power of U.S. intelligence 
agencies. It seemed that Rumsfeld et al was comfortable giving the power 
to arbitrarily destroy anyone as “enemies of the state” by anyone 
working in the IC and MIC.
COINTELPRO (COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert and 
illegal projects conducted by the FBI aimed at surveilling, 
infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic “political dissidents.”
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and 
individuals that the FBI deemed subversive, including anti Vietnam War 
organizers, activists of the Civil Rights Movement or Black Power 
movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party), 
feminist organizations, anti colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican 
independence groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of 
organizations that were part of the broader New Left.
FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives on COINTELPRO, ordering 
FBI agents to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or 
otherwise eliminate” the activities of these movements and especially 
their leaders. Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO was 
William C. Sullivan.
Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of 
documents that would divide their targets internally.
After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled 
out King as a major target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to 
focus on King, Sullivan wrote: “In the light of King’s powerful 
demagogic speech, we must mark him now, if we have not done so before, 
as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the 
standpoint of communism, the Negro, and national security.”
The Final Report of the Select Frank Church Committee blasted the 
behavior of the intelligence community in its domestic operations 
(including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:
“The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence 
community at times violated specific statutory prohibitions and 
infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal 
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. 
On other occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief 
that because the programs served the “national security” the law did not 
apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to 
their superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, 
the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those of 
senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence 
activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law. Many 
of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even 
if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but 
COINTELPRO went far beyond that – the Bureau conducted a sophisticated 
vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First 
Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that 
preventing the growth of dangerous groups and the propagation of 
dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.”
According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used 
four main methods during COINTELPRO:
(1) Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political 
activists. Their main purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very 
presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential supporters. 
The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents;
(2) Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad “dirty tricks” 
to undermine progressive movements. They planted false media stories and 
published bogus leaflets and other publications in the name of targeted 
groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made 
anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and 
events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents, and 
manipulated or strong armed parents, employers, landlords, school 
officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad 
jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with 
lethal consequences;
(3) Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal 
system to harass dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. 
Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and presented fabricated 
evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They 
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and 
used conspicuous surveillance, “investigative” interviews, and grand 
jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists and silence their 
supporters;
(4) Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to 
threaten dissidents; to conduct illegal break ins in order to search 
dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults, beatings and 
assassinations. The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and 
disrupt their movements.
The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and 
hostility between various factions in their targeted groups and 
individuals, and this resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San 
Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and 
Sylvester Bell.
While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege 
that continuing FBI actions indicate that post COINTELPRO reforms did 
not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.
ENTER THE “COPS” FEDERAL AND STATE SANCTIONED GANG-STALKING PROGRAM
“Community Oriented Policing,” (“COPS”) is a strategy of policing that 
focuses on police “building ties and working closely with members of the 
communities,” and originated in 1994 when then Senator Joseph Biden 
wrote and then President Bill Clinton enacted the Violent Crime Control 
and Law Enforcement Act (“VCCLEA”) establishing the Office of Community 
Oriented Policing Services (“COPS”) within the US Department of Justice.
Community policing is supposedly a policy that requires police to engage 
in a “proactive approach” to address public safety concerns, and is a 
cornerstone of the Clinton Administration, gaining its funding from the 
1994 Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act.
Common implementations of community policing include: (1) relying on 
community based crime prevention by utilizing “civilian education,” 
neighborhood watch, and a variety of other techniques, as opposed to 
relying solely on police patrols; (2) restructuring the patrol from an 
emergency response based system to emphasizing proactive techniques such 
as foot patrol; (3) increased officer accountability to civilians they 
are “supposed to serve;” and (4) decentralizing police authority, 
allowing more discretion amongst lower ranking officers, and more 
initiative expected from them.
In other words, federal and state sanctioned and approved GANG-STALKING.
Gang Stalking has been described as fascism, using East Germany style 
“Stasi Tactics,” a systemic form of control, which seeks to control 
every aspect of a “Targeted Individual’s” life. Gang Stalking has many 
similarities to workplace mobbing, but takes place outside in the 
community, where the target is followed around and placed under 
surveillance by groups of organized civilian spies/snitches 24/7, 365 
days a year. Targeted Individuals are harassed in this way for months or 
years before they realize that they are being targeted by an organized 
program of gang-stalking harassment. This is very similar to what 
happened to many innocent individuals in the former East Germany or 
activists and dissidents in the former Soviet Union. Many innocent 
people in the former East Germany would be targeted for these harassment 
programs, and then their friends, family, and the community at large 
would be used to monitor, prosecute, and harass them. In the former USSR 
it was used by the state to target activists, political dissidents, or 
anyone that the Secret Police thought was an “enemy of the state,” or as 
“mentally unfit,” and many were institutionalized or murdered using this 
form of systematic control.
In Bill Clinton’s COPS Gang-Stalking Program, civilian spies are 
recruited from every segment of society, and everyone in the “targets” 
life is made a part of this ongoing, continuous, and systematic form of 
control and harassment, with such actions that are specifically designed 
to control the target and to “keep them in line,” like a Pavlovian Dog. 
These actions are also designed to mentally, physically, emotionally, 
spiritually, financially, socially, and psychologically destroy the 
target over years, to make them appear to be crazy, and leave them with 
no form of support, whatsoever.
For the targets of this harassment, COPS Gang Stalking is experienced as 
a covert psychological, emotional and physical attack that is capable of 
immobilizing and destroying a target over time. For the state, it is a 
way to keep their targets in line, control them, or ultimately destroy them.
This modern day systematic form of control is funded at the highest 
levels of government, just like it has in other societies where these 
similar types of harassment programs have been implemented.
Targets can be chosen for many reasons: (1) political views; (2) whistle 
blowing; (3) political dissidence; (4) asserting rights at work; (5) 
making the wrong enemy; (6) too outspoken; (7) investigating something 
that the state does not want investigated; (8) signing a petition; (9) 
writing a letter; (10) being “suspicious” by a civilian spy/snitch; or 
(11) being a religious/ethnic/racial minority.
The goal of the COPS state sanctioned organized gang-stalking program is 
to isolate the target from all forms of support, so that the target can 
be set up in the future for arrest, institutionalized, or forced 
suicide. Other goals of this harassment are to destroy the targets 
reputation and credibility, and to make the target look “crazy” or unstable.
The process often involves sensitizing the target to every day stimuli’s 
as a form of control, which is used to control targets when they “get 
out of line.” Targets of this harassment become vulnerable and 
destitute, and often become homeless, jobless, have a breakdown, are 
driven to suicide, similar to targets of the banned COINTELPRO. The 
government eliminates perceived “enemies of the state” in this manner.
When a target moves or changes jobs, the harassment continues.
Every time the target moves, the same defamation, lies, libel, and 
slander will be spread, and the systematic harassment will continue. 
Online defamation, libel, and slander on the internet has made this 
continuation of COPS gang-stalking a great deal easier.
People from all segments of society can be recruited to be the “eyes and 
ears” of the state, such as laborers, drug dealers, drug users, street 
people, prostitutes, punks, church groups, youth groups, your best 
friend, your lawyer, local policeman, doctor, emergency services, a 
neighbor, family, social workers, politicians, judges, dentists, vet, 
supermarket cashier, postman, religious leader, care worker, landlord, 
anyone.
Most of these recruited civilian spies/snitches do not understand or 
even care that the end consequence of this harassment protocol is to 
eventually destroy the targeted person, and function as “useful idiots” 
of the state sanctioned COPS gang-stalking program.
It has been reported that people participate in this COPS gang stalking 
because it: (1) gives them a sense of power; (2) is a way to make 
friends; (3) is something social and fun; (4) breaks down 
race/gender/age/social barriers; (5) is forced or blackmailed upon them 
by the State or police to take part; (6) is told to them that they are 
part of “homeland or national security” to help keep an eye on 
“dangerous” or “emotionally disturbed” individuals where they are 
“heroic spies for the state;” (7) is used on local thugs or informants 
who are already being used for other activities where their energies are 
diverted into these COPS gangstalking community spy programs; (8) is 
either a choice of spying for the State or police, or else go to jail; 
(9) involves outright lies and slander about the target to get them to 
go along with ruining the targets life; (10) includes average citizens 
recruited by the state the same way citizens were recruited in the 
former East Germany and other countries.
Some techniques used against targets in this organized COPS 
Gang-stalking program include: (1) classic conditioning where a target 
is sensitized to everyday stimuli over a period of months and years to 
harass them in public to let them know they are constantly being 
harassed and monitored; (2) 24/7 Surveillance following the target 
everywhere they go, learning about the target and where they shop, work, 
play, who their friends and family are, getting close to the target, 
moving into the community or apartment where they live, across the 
street, monitoring the targets phone, house, and computer activity; (3) 
isolating the target via defamation, libel, and slander campaigns, (eg, 
people in the target’s community are told that the target is a thief, 
into drugs, a prostitute, pedophile, crazy, in trouble for something, 
needs to be watched, false files will even be produced on the target, 
shown to neighbors, family, store keepers); (4) constant or intermittent 
noise and mimicking campaigns disrupting the targets life and sleep with 
loud power tools, construction, stereos, doors slamming, etc; (5) 
talking in public about private things in the target’s life; (6) 
mimicking actions of the target and basically letting the target know 
that they are in the target’s life; (7) daily interferences, not too 
overt to the untrained eye, but psychologically degrading and damaging 
to the target over time; (8) everyday life breaks and street theater 
such as flat tires, sleep deprivation, drugging food, putting dirt on 
targets property; (9) mass strangers doing things in public to annoy 
targets such as getting called/text messages to be at a specific time 
and place to perform a specific action; (10) blocking targets path, 
getting ahead of them in line, cutting or boxing them in on the road, 
saying or doing things to elicit a response from the target; (11) 
“baiting” tactics where a surveillance operation can selectively capture 
evidence of a targeted person responding to harassment, and then that 
evidence could then be used to justify the initiation of more formal 
scrutiny by a government agency.
The COPS Gang-Stalking Program, as all other state sanctioned/approved 
gang-stalking programs, have always been funded by the Government. They 
are the only ones with enough money, coordination, and power to keep 
such a system in place. These coordinated efforts then join hands with 
others for this systemic form of control and harassment.
Such operations have nothing to do with the target’s criminality – they 
are led and perpetrated by federal agents and intelligence/security 
contractors, often with the support of state and local law enforcement 
personnel. Unofficial operations of this type are often private 
investigators and vigilantes – including many former agents and police 
officers, sometimes on behalf of corporate clients and others with 
connections to the public and private elements of America’s security 
industry.
The goal of such operations is “disruption” of the life of an individual 
deemed to be an enemy (or potential enemy) of clients or members of the 
security state. Arguably, the most accurate term for this form of 
harassment would be “counterintelligence stalking.”
Agents of communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) referred to this 
process as Zersetzung (German for “decomposition” or “corrosion” – a 
reference to the severe psychological, social, and financial effects 
upon the victim). Victims have described the process as “no touch 
torture” – a phrase which also captures the nature of the crime: 
cowardly, unethical (and often illegal), but difficult to prove legally, 
because it generates minimal forensic evidence.
Tactics include online and personal slander, libel, defamation, 
blacklisting, “mobbing” (intense, organized harassment in public), 
“black bag jobs” (residential break ins), abusive phone calls, computer 
hacking, framing, threats, blackmail, vandalism, “street theater” 
(staged physical and verbal interactions with the minions of the people 
who orchestrate the stalking), harassment by noises, and other forms of 
bullying.
Such stalking is sanctioned (and in some cases, orchestrated) by federal 
agencies; however such stalking is also sometimes used unofficially for 
personal and corporate vendettas by current and former corrupt employees 
of law enforcement and intelligence agencies, private investigators, and 
their clients.
Since counterintelligence stalking goes far beyond surveillance – into 
the realm of psychological terrorism, as it is essentially a form of 
extrajudicial punishment. As such, the harassment is illegal – even when 
done by the government. It clearly violates the US Constitution’s Fourth 
Amendment, which prohibits unwarranted searches, and the Sixth Amendment 
which guarantees the right to a trial. Such operations also violate 
similar fundamental rights defined by state constitutions. Stalking is 
also specifically prohibited by the criminal codes of every state in 
America.
As was stated above, organized stalking methods were used extensively by 
communist East Germany’s Stasi (state police) as a means of maintaining 
political control over its citizens. Although this is supposedly illegal 
in the US, the same covert tactics are quietly used by America’s local 
and federal law enforcement, and intelligence agencies, to suppress 
political and domestic dissent, silence whistle blowers, and get revenge 
against persons who have angered someone with connections to the public 
and private agencies involved.
Although Edward Snowden’s revelations about the National Security Agency 
(“NSA”) in 2013 and 2014 generated a great deal of public discussion 
about mass surveillance, US domestic counterintelligence activities such 
as the COPS Program receive relatively little attention.
The FBI’s COINTELPRO operation is still happening, involving even more 
advanced surveillance technology – and this program is none other than 
Joseph Biden and Bill Clinton’s COPS Program.
US Department of Justice crime statistics from a 2006 survey indicated 
that an estimated 445,220 COPS gangstalking victims reported three or 
more perpetrators (the only ones reported), and this number is growing 
exponentially on a daily basis.
In addition to being morally reprehensible, the COPS gang stalking 
program, just like the original version of the FBI’s COINTELPRO 
operations, is very, very illegal. It violates criminal laws in all 
fifty states against stalking, as well as grossly violates the US 
Constitution’s prohibitions against warrantless searches and extra 
judicial punishment.
While the vast majority of Americans are never personally targeted by 
the Joseph Biden/Bill Clinton COPS gangstalking program, they should 
still be concerned about the existence of such operations.
Even if such activities were constitutionally legitimate (which they are 
not), they still have an enormous potential for abuse as a personal or 
political weapon by enemies currently employed or friendly with these 
governmental institutions.
Ending this cowardly and illegal practice by law enforcement agencies, 
intelligence agencies, and their parasitic corporate and individual 
recruits will first require exposing what is happening, to the public.