Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Ray say foxhunting only .2% as effective as speed seduction or PUA methods.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Odious

unread,
Nov 18, 2001, 2:56:20 PM11/18/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> > : She's not all women...the women who date nice guys don't whine, don't
> > : complain, and don't search for other men.
> >
> > What every nice guy wishes were true.
>
> It is true. Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets the
> rough equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS.
>

So for a foxhunter, getting one girlfriend is so hard that it is like a
normal PUA getting 500 pickups?

It will take the same amount of effort for a foxhunter to get one
girlfriend, that is will take for a PUA to get 500 successful pick ups.

So ray has admitted that for every 500 chicks a SSer or PUA gets, a
foxhunter gets 1.

In other words foxhunting is .2% as effective as speed seduction or PUA
methods.

Ray Gordon, GENIUS

unread,
Nov 18, 2001, 7:38:14 PM11/18/01
to
Someone teach this stupid punk to read.


Ray Gordon, GENIUS

unread,
Nov 18, 2001, 9:18:30 PM11/18/01
to
> > It is true. Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets
the
> > rough equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS.
> >
>
> So for a foxhunter, getting one girlfriend is so hard that it is like a
> normal PUA getting 500 pickups?
>
> It will take the same amount of effort for a foxhunter to get one
> girlfriend, that is will take for a PUA to get 500 successful pick ups.


No, I said it would yield the same amount of sex.

Getting the girlfriend is easier than doing 500 pickups, and it's a lot less
risky sexually.

Also, the girlfriends an AFC gets are not sluts and are generally of higher
quality (but not always).

You think ASF methods would work on Jennifer Aniston?


Odious

unread,
Nov 18, 2001, 9:24:49 PM11/18/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> Someone teach this stupid punk to read.

"Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets the rough
equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS."


1 is .2% of 500, is it not?

Odious

unread,
Nov 18, 2001, 9:47:25 PM11/18/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> > > It is true. Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets
> the
> > > rough equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS.
> > >
> >
> > So for a foxhunter, getting one girlfriend is so hard that it is like a
> > normal PUA getting 500 pickups?
> >
> > It will take the same amount of effort for a foxhunter to get one
> > girlfriend, that is will take for a PUA to get 500 successful pick ups.
>
> No, I said it would yield the same amount of sex.
>

That's not what you said. Though I understand why you are now trying to
lie about what you said. Too bad for you it is recorded.

"Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets the rough
equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS."

> Getting the girlfriend is easier than doing 500 pickups, and it's a lot less
> risky sexually.

Yet above you clearly characterize them as roughly equivalent. So are
you lying now or were you lying then?


> Also, the girlfriends an AFC gets are not sluts and are generally of higher
> quality (but not always).

If AFCs were getting girlfriends, they wouldn't be here, nimrod.


> You think ASF methods would work on Jennifer Aniston?

Sure they would work, provided she's not like totally stupid or a coke
head or something.

HC

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 1:55:20 AM11/19/01
to
Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try and
figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every time
he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that what's
happening here?

Ray Gordon, GENIUS

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 2:17:06 AM11/19/01
to
> Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try
and
> figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every
time
> he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that
what's
> happening here?

Right, stupid like with Utah +6 (covered, 24-27) and North Texas St. -1
(50-27 winner).....

This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.

psst: I can even hire a lawyer to sue the shit out of him, but don't tell
him.


Br...@interbaun.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 3:09:18 AM11/19/01
to
Ray Gordon, GENIUS wrote:
>
> > Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try
> and
> > figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every
> time
> > he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that
> what's
> > happening here?
>
> Right, stupid like with Utah +6 (covered, 24-27) and North Texas St. -1
> (50-27 winner).....
>
> This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
> audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.
===========
Ray Moron's, ahem, "brilliant handicapping"
is still DOCUMENTED 3-10, -7.7 units (NFL)

John C. Randolph

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 4:59:04 AM11/19/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> Someone teach this stupid punk to read.

Right after they teach you to *count*, loser. His math is correct.

-jcr

Ray Gordon, GENIUS

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 9:16:28 AM11/19/01
to
> > This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
> > audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.
> ===========
> Ray Moron's, ahem, "brilliant handicapping"
> is still DOCUMENTED 3-10, -7.7 units (NFL)

Well yes, if you were to bet the PRESEASON equally to the REGULAR season.
Brian also likes to ignore that most bettors don't bet equally on every
game.

Then of course there's my BASKETBALL record, but posting that would make him
look bad....


Br...@interbaun.com

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 11:40:00 AM11/19/01
to
Ray Gordon, GENIUS wrote:
>
> > > This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
> > > audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.
> > ===========
> > Ray Moron's, ahem, "brilliant handicapping"
> > is still DOCUMENTED 3-10, -7.7 units (NFL)
>
> Well yes, if you were to bet the PRESEASON equally to the REGULAR season.
=========
A posted pick is a posted pick.
Wins and losses is the name of the recordkeeping game.
(all per the "one unit per play" scoring standard, naturally)

> Then of course there's my BASKETBALL record, but posting that would make him
> look bad....

==========
ROTFLMAO
Go ahead and post the record of the basketball picks which
you claim *YOU POSTED* to rgs under *YOUR* screen name.
Upon verification of the game results, we will attribute
all pickss which *YOU POSTED* under *YOUR* screen name
to your officially documented record.
But as far as I recall seeing myself, there's only that
one losing NBA pick you posted on June 11 (76ers +170)
This looks a lot worse for YOU,TOUT FRAUD, than it does for me.
Now, let's just see if "the SCAMMER/SHILL" comes racing up in
to support the TOUT FRAUD...my guess is he will...let's watch...

Gary Collard

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 12:12:07 PM11/19/01
to
"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> > Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try
> and
> > figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every
> time
> > he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that
> what's
> > happening here?
>
> Right, stupid like with Utah +6 (covered, 24-27) and North Texas St. -1
> (50-27 winner).....

Following three losers. Ray is now 2-3, -1.1 units on huge plays, which
are those he made to start over and hide from his previous record of 6-12.

--
Gary Collard
SABR-L Moderator
coll...@earthlink.net

"We consider this action to be inconsistent with the law, our
contract, and perhaps most important, the long term welfare of
the sport."
-- Donald Fehr on MLB contraction

Gary Collard

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 12:12:52 PM11/19/01
to

Basketball record: 0-0, with a futures play on Washington to win the NBA
title pending.

Odious

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 11:44:57 PM11/19/01
to

The only thing that makes Ray look worse than his lies... is when he
tells the truth.

Foxhunting is .2% as effective as speed seduction.

> Not only that, each time an AFC gets a girlfriend, he gets the
> rough equivalent of FIVE HUNDRED PICKUPS.
>

So ray has admitted that for every 500 chicks a SSer or PUA gets, a

Odious

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 11:52:56 PM11/19/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> > > This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
> > > audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.
> > ===========
> > Ray Moron's, ahem, "brilliant handicapping"
> > is still DOCUMENTED 3-10, -7.7 units (NFL)
>
> Well yes, if you were to bet the PRESEASON equally to the REGULAR season.
> Brian also likes to ignore that most bettors don't bet equally on every
> game.
>

Oh so if they only lose a little money on the ones you got wrong, they
weren't really wrong?

Yep, that's the logic of a scammer.

Odious

unread,
Nov 19, 2001, 11:55:37 PM11/19/01
to

"Ray Gordon, GENIUS" wrote:
>
> > Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try
> and
> > figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every
> time
> > he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that
> what's
> > happening here?
>
> Right, stupid like with Utah +6 (covered, 24-27) and North Texas St. -1
> (50-27 winner).....
>
> This is a very bitter, jealous man who knows that I can win over the
> audience with my BRILLIANT handicapping.
>

Like you win over ASF with your brilliant seduction methods... and you
win over alt.hypnosis with your brilliant hypnosis... and you win over
alt.sports.gymnastics with you brilliant coaching?

Funny how every group you go to, you claim to be an expert on the subject
matter... and in every group you go to people can see you are full of
shit.

Anybody starting to notice a pattern?

Odious

unread,
Nov 20, 2001, 12:00:26 AM11/20/01
to

HC wrote:
>
> Is Ray having a problem with math and percentages? You should see him try and
> figure out basic handicapping 101 math over on rec.gambling.sports! Every time
> he tries to sound knowledgable, he appears to get more stupid! Is that what's
> happening here?
>

That the norm for Ray in all the groups where he goes and tries to
pretend to be an expert on the subject matter so he can sell some useless
shit to unsuspecting newbies.

You can check out this page to see info about Ray's behavior in ASF:

http://members.odinsrage.com/asfrayfaq

0 new messages