Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Idiot "player" posts chat log; she's not thrilled

1 view
Skip to first unread message

LeModernCaveman

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 1:39:11 PM1/12/05
to
God these boys are STUPID.

She sure didn't go DDB when she saw the link to the intimate chat log he
posted, not only with her name, but the guy posted a bunch of OTHER shit that
made it easy to figure out who was involved.

Chick said something about telling her dad...I hope she does.

Seems that not all chicks like ASF guys once they find out they are ASF guys.
She called the guy who posted that log a loser in so many different ways it
wasn't even funny.


SluttyFox

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 1:53:43 PM1/12/05
to

> God these boys are STUPID.

Most boys are.


>
> She sure didn't go DDB when she saw the link to the intimate chat log he
> posted, not only with her name, but the guy posted a bunch of OTHER shit
> that
> made it easy to figure out who was involved.

Why would she go into trance reading a chat log? You have taken women into
trance, haven't you?


>
> Chick said something about telling her dad...I hope she does.

Her dad?....sounds like KIDS messing around.


>
> Seems that not all chicks like ASF guys once they find out they are ASF
> guys.
> She called the guy who posted that log a loser in so many different ways
> it
> wasn't even funny.

Who cares what Kiddies are doing.

SluttyFox
Women are creative when stalking
>
>
>

Ray Gordon

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 6:17:25 PM1/12/05
to
>
>> Seems that not all chicks like ASF guys once they find out they are ASF
>> guys.
>> She called the guy who posted that log a loser in so many different ways
>> it
>> wasn't even funny.
>
> Who cares what Kiddies are doing.

How easy to mock something so obvious that someone doesn't want to discuss.

JJT

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 6:43:30 PM1/12/05
to

>> Who cares what Kiddies are doing.
>
>How easy to mock something so obvious that someone doesn't want to discuss.


** You admitted (see below) you ".wished."
** a child would die, JUST to get revenge on
** her mother for her crime of ".loving you."


SO, the question is, Mr. Gordon Roy Parker:


".how old was Michelle's daughter Cierra
when you "wished" she would die, and if
your "wish" could come true, what would
you "wish" to happen to her.. ?????? ."


...Usenet records seem to note her age at 6 or 7...


..again..PLEASE..for the record... Tell us all..


Does this refresh your memory, Mr. Parker..?


>>Path: news.alt.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
>>Cc: cave...@nni.com
>>Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 07:58:08 -0400
>>Subject: Ray Takes FULL RESPONSIBLITY For The Michelle Mistake
>>Message-ID: <20000628.075839.-285523.10.The...@juno.com>
>>X-Mailer: Juno 2.0.11
>>X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 2-3,6-9,17-18,20-21,29-30,40-41,48-49,61-62,71-72,84-85,94-95,105-106,
>>115-116,126-127,133-134,154-155,164-165,178-179,187-188,196-199,201-202,206-207,212-213,
>>215-216,219-220,222-226,228-231,237-238,241-246,249-250,257-258,264-265,274-275,289-290,293-300
>>X-Juno-Att: 0
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: text/plain
>>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>From: The Seduction Library <the______seductio...@juno.com>
>>Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
>>Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
>>Newsgroups: alt.romance
>>Lines: 307
>>Xref: news alt.romance:246369

>>WARNING: If Oedipus, Krusty or Tusky respond to this message in any way,
>>I will return to ASF immediately. If they want me off that newsgroup
>>they can stay the hell out of my threads.

>>Read up. I post this not for myself, because I don't care what people
>>think of me. I post this for my METHOD, because it's being destroyed by
>>attacks on its creator.

>>I am going to clear the record on a few things here:

>>1. I DID wish death on Michelle's daughter Cierra. I did so in an
>>attempt to snap her back to reality after she had used others' defamation
>>of me as leverage to get me to want her. Why did I "hurt" her? I DID
>>NOT TALK TO HER. That's correct: my crime with Michelle was not falling
>>back in love with her after she had fallen in love with me for four
>>months, IMing me constantly, E-mailing me constantly, BEGGING me to love
>>her the way I "loved" "Dominique" (these two are in quotes because I
>>neither loved her nor necessarily knew her).

>>2. Wishing death on someone is not a crime. The words were spoken in
>>anger, after MONTHS of provocation


Main Entry: mo·lest
Pronunciation: m&-'lest
Function: transitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Middle French molester, from
Latin molestare, from molestus burdensome, annoying; akin to
Latin moles mass

1 : to annoy, disturb, or persecute especially with hostile
intent or injurious effect

2 : to make annoying sexual advances to; especially : to
force physical and usually sexual contact on

- mo·les·ta·tion /"mO-"les-'tA-sh&n, "mä-, -l&s-/ noun
- mo·lest·er /m&-'les-t&r/ noun

User3247

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 7:38:33 PM1/12/05
to
They never do.

Ray Gordon

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 8:00:00 PM1/12/05
to
The chick took me seriously enough to chew out the guy who did it (big
time). She did say something about women scorned, but that's not my
problem.

You can be sure every last female friend she has will be checking out "the
community" too. See, even if the guys stop using the methods NOW, women
have very long memories when it comes to past seductions.

Alex

unread,
Jan 12, 2005, 10:41:36 PM1/12/05
to
in article 9eiFd.12910$4b.3711@trndny09, Ray Gordon at r...@cybersheet.com
wrote on 1/12/05 6:17 PM:

Gordon conveniently left out the part about the girl going to tell "Daddy."

Can't imagine why.

Daniel

unread,
Jan 13, 2005, 12:00:27 PM1/13/05
to

"Ray Gordon" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:9eiFd.12910$4b.3711@trndny09...


Why not? We mock your failure to discuss ANYTHING.


0 new messages