Spanish Pick Up Artists and language issues.
Alex D'Amante
This is my first post to the group. I'd like to know if there are any
Spanish PUAs here. I'd also like to know if there is any compilation of
SS patterns in Spanish.
Apart from that, what do you guys think about sarging in a language in
which you are not completely fluent? I have found that in a one on one
it doesn't really matter. (And in some cases it may also be a good
thing if she doesn't speak very well). But in certain scenarios, like
opening a set in a club, where it can be difficult to understand what
they are saying, I don't feel good if I am not able to understand all
that they are saying. The extreme situation is when people is joking in
a language I don't speak. Any advice on handling that situations?
Thanks
¬¬ Alex
TheHC...@aol.com
Do you have any advice for me on how to seduce GYMNASTS?
>
> Thanks
>
> ¬¬ Alex
Ray Gordon
"Keystone" films.
Gitmoizer
Have you considered starting a google group of your own, but for
spanish? It's free and could be a great way to meet new people and
expand knowledge in another language. Use this link to do it.
http://groups.google.com/groups/create?lnk=l
I speak a foreign language as well and knowing the language you are
picking up in is certainly critical to success. However, the concepts
are still the same. Women are the same no matter where they are or
what language they speak.
Good luck.
Alex D'Amante
interesting guy, classy, dressed in a very fashionable way and also
trying to lead the conversation of the group, like a showman, into
fascinating topics.
I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act a little bit like
Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very incoherent with the rest of my
stuff? Wouldn't that be falling into clown zone?
I was thinking about something more in the lines of "Hey guys, let's
play a game, ok? This game is called SPEAKING IN ENGLISH! :D"
Thanks
¬¬ Alex
johnebravo836
Alex D'Amante wrote:
> Right now I am learning how to project higher value by being an
> interesting guy, classy, dressed in a very fashionable way and also
> trying to lead the conversation of the group, like a showman, into
> fascinating topics.
>
> I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act a little bit like
> Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very incoherent with the rest of my
> stuff? Wouldn't that be falling into clown zone?
I'm guessing you're relatively new to the group. Readers who have read
very many of his posts over time would have immediately recognized that
Mr. Parker was attempting to make a sarcastic remark at your expense.
You're taking him seriously, but he was attempting to be "witty" and to
imply that you're utterly clueless.
Just don't pay any attention to him, other than for entertainment
purposes. It might be helpful to simply think of him as the cyberspace
equivalent of a "village idiot". ;)
>
> I was thinking about something more in the lines of "Hey guys, let's
> play a game, ok? This game is called SPEAKING IN ENGLISH! :D"
>
> Thanks
>
> 洵 Alex
>
TheHC...@aol.com
> If there is a language barrier, you can act like Charlie Chaplin from his
> "Keystone" films.
And yet others act like they know what they are talking about yet they
have no proven real world experience, just a bunch of unsupported
baloney they spew from their keyboard in mommy's apartment.
Ray Gordon
>>interesting guy, classy, dressed >>in a very fashionable way and also
>>trying to lead >>the conversation of the group, like a showman, >>into
>>fascinating topics.
Because some idiot on the net told you to?
>>I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act >>a little bit like
>>Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very
>>incoherent with the rest of my stuff? Wouldn't >>that be falling into
>>clown zone?
I think you mean "incongruent."
The idea is to overcome the language barrier, so no, it's not.
>>I was thinking about something more in the lines >>of "Hey guys, let's
>>play a game, ok? This game is >>called SPEAKING IN ENGLISH! :D"Thanks
If you can make it work, go for it.
I'd do the Chaplin thing, myself.
HeeroYuy
"Ray Gordon" <r...@cybersheet.com> wrote in message
news:U8tcf.4375$ek6...@news-wrt-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com...
>>>Right now I am learning how to project higher >>value by being an
>>>interesting guy, classy, dressed >>in a very fashionable way and also
>>>trying to lead >>the conversation of the group, like a showman, >>into
>>>fascinating topics.
>
> Because some idiot on the net told you to?
And Gordon wonders why he never gained credibility among newbies.
>
>
>>>I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act >>a little bit like
>>>Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very
>>>incoherent with the rest of my stuff? Wouldn't >>that be falling into
>>>clown zone?
>
> I think you mean "incongruent."
>
> The idea is to overcome the language barrier, so no, it's not.
>
>
>>>I was thinking about something more in the lines >>of "Hey guys, let's
>>>play a game, ok? This game is >>called SPEAKING IN ENGLISH! :D"Thanks
>
> If you can make it work, go for it.
"Formulate your own plan." Sound familiar?
>
> I'd do the Chaplin thing, myself.
Wait, so Gordon wouldn't talk? That must feel refreshing to the ladies.
Ray Gordon
>>>>I was thinking about something more in the lines >>of "Hey guys, let's
>>>>play a game, ok? This game is >>called SPEAKING IN ENGLISH! :D"Thanks
>>
>> If you can make it work, go for it.
>
> "Formulate your own plan." Sound familiar?
Yep. Just about every guru now recommends this.
Ray Gordon
>> interesting guy, classy, dressed in a very fashionable way and also
>> trying to lead the conversation of the group, like a showman, into
>> fascinating topics.
>>
>> I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act a little bit like
>> Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very incoherent with the rest of my
>> stuff? Wouldn't that be falling into clown zone?
>
> I'm guessing you're relatively new to the group. Readers who have read
> very many of his posts over time would have immediately recognized that
> Mr. Parker was attempting to make a sarcastic remark at your expense.
> You're taking him seriously, but he was attempting to be "witty" and to
> imply that you're utterly clueless.
Wrong. I was trying to imply that one could learn a lot about nonverbal
communication with people who speak different languages by watching the
greatest silent film star of all time.
> Just don't pay any attention to him, other than for entertainment
> purposes. It might be helpful to simply think of him as the cyberspace
> equivalent of a "village idiot". ;)
Men who are swayed by anonymous internet haters will get the shitty results
with women that they deserve.
Alex
r...@cybersheet.com wrote on 11/9/05 8:44 PM:
>>> Right now I am learning how to project higher value by being an
>>> interesting guy, classy, dressed in a very fashionable way and also
>>> trying to lead the conversation of the group, like a showman, into
>>> fascinating topics.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act a little bit like
>>> Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very incoherent with the rest of my
>>> stuff? Wouldn't that be falling into clown zone?
>>
>> I'm guessing you're relatively new to the group. Readers who have read
>> very many of his posts over time would have immediately recognized that
>> Mr. Parker was attempting to make a sarcastic remark at your expense.
>> You're taking him seriously, but he was attempting to be "witty" and to
>> imply that you're utterly clueless.
>
> Wrong. I was trying to imply that one could learn a lot about nonverbal
> communication with people who speak different languages by watching the
> greatest silent film star of all time.
In one sentence, Gordon shows he knows nothing about silent films,
non-verbal communication and differences in body language between cultures
all at once.
A new record in ignorance, even for him.
>
>
>> Just don't pay any attention to him, other than for entertainment
>> purposes. It might be helpful to simply think of him as the cyberspace
>> equivalent of a "village idiot". ;)
>
> Men who are swayed by anonymous internet haters will get the shitty results
> with women that they deserve.
>
As if the ridicule Gordon so richly deserves would have any bearing on
anything in anyone else's life.
johnebravo836
Ray Gordon wrote:
>>>Right now I am learning how to project higher value by being an
>>>interesting guy, classy, dressed in a very fashionable way and also
>>>trying to lead the conversation of the group, like a showman, into
>>>fascinating topics.
>>>
>>>I wouldn't have much trouble learning how to act a little bit like
>>>Chaplin, but wouldn't that be very incoherent with the rest of my
>>>stuff? Wouldn't that be falling into clown zone?
>>
>>I'm guessing you're relatively new to the group. Readers who have read
>>very many of his posts over time would have immediately recognized that
>>Mr. Parker was attempting to make a sarcastic remark at your expense.
>>You're taking him seriously, but he was attempting to be "witty" and to
>>imply that you're utterly clueless.
>
>
> Wrong. I was trying to imply that one could learn a lot about nonverbal
> communication with people who speak different languages by watching the
> greatest silent film star of all time.
My goodness, well, I guess I stand corrected. Evidently, I was giving
you too much credit -- I assumed that even *you* couldn't possibly be so
stupid as to offer such hopelessly idiotic advice sincerely. I'll try
not to make the mistake of overestimating you again; I'm terribly
embarrassed to have done it this time. I really should know better by
now, but you continue to surprise me over and over again. ;)
>
>
>
>>Just don't pay any attention to him, other than for entertainment
>>purposes. It might be helpful to simply think of him as the cyberspace
>>equivalent of a "village idiot". ;)
>
>
> Men who are swayed by anonymous internet haters will get the shitty results
> with women that they deserve.
Yes, if you want to "do great" like Mr. Parker is doing -- that is,
according to his own count (which is almost certainly inflated in his
favor) -- you too can hope to land as many as 3 or 4 new women over the
course of the next 3 years . . .