Re: Folder Marked 'Classified' On Display In Bar At Trump Tower

[dot]

On 03 Sep 2022, Technobarbarian <technobarbar...@gmail.com>
posted some news:tf01un$f3h$1...@gioia.aioe.org:

>
> Folder Marked 'Classified' On Display In Bar At Trump Tower

So what?

I have 20+ folders marked "Confidential" "Secret" and "Top Secret" in a
box in my garage. There's no law against having those folders.

This whole DOJ / FBI secret documents thing is a red herring, box of stale
cereal, flat tire etc., contrived to stir up ignorant people who know
nothing about security classifications.

Since most of you whining liberal cunts would never dream of serving your
country, you know nothing about such things, including who has the
authority to declassifiy information that might be in those folders.

If you buy into this Merrick Garland / Jan 6 / one ring circus crap,
you're an uninformed sucker and a fool.

[Bud Frawley]

On 9/3/2022 11:14 AM, #ReamMeUpTheAssSnotty, brain-damaged fucktard who rode his
scooter into a tree while not wearing a helmet, stupidly bawled and lied:

> On 03 Sep 2022, Technobarbarian <technobarbar...@gmail.com>
> posted some news:tf01un$f3h$1...@gioia.aioe.org:
>
>>
>> Folder Marked 'Classified' On Display In Bar At Trump Tower
>
> So what?

So it's proof that the FBI has not recovered all the classified documents Trump
*stole*.

[Yamn Remailer]

>So it's proof that the FBI has not recovered all the classified
documents Trump
>*stole*.

The real question might be: How many has Trump given or sold to the
Russians, or left laying around for China to find ?

[dot]

On 03 Sep 2022, Technobarbarian <technobarbar...@gmail.com>

posted some news:tf0ku9$9i5$1...@gioia.aioe.org:

> On 9/3/2022 1:57 PM, Technobarbarian wrote:

>>      LOL Sensitive much? So what yourself? At this point the
>> most
>> likely explanation for that display is that it's a joke and
>> conversation starter. It never changes. Fascists never seem to have
>> much of a sense of humor.
>>
>> TB
>
> LOL I know I'm a sucker and a fool. I have a Vietnam era DD214
> to
> prove it. Unlike cadet bone spurs. I had a top secret security
> clearance because I served in the intelligence section of an Admiral's
> staff. I went to Vietnam 3 different times with 4 different Admirals.
> So I might know a little more about the subject than some random idiot
> who feels called on to state the usual bullshit.
>
> TB

So you were a piddly squid and sat your fat ass safely on a boat, BFD. I
also have a Vietnam era DD214. I earned mine doing something useful on
the ground with a rifle and pistol instead of kneeling and bobbing in
officer country out on the water. I had clearances that were Final Secret
and later Final Top Secret (DIA SBI). I did real men's work taking LCAC
taxis or helos off LPDs.

Anybody with a Confidential, Secret, Interim Top Secret or Final Top
Secret clearance knows the same ropes and they are very simple. Follow
the rules. Maintain strict custody and do not look at shit that does not
concern you. Report anybody who inquires about something classified you
know. Somebody, not just anybody, is assigned the responsibility of
determining "need to know". It's not some puke intelligence non-rate /
NCO clerk or even a senior intel officer. Their jobs are to safeguard the
information and route it to the correct recipients, then return it and
secure it.

Merrick Garland and the FBI have already violated the most basic
principles of safeguarding classified information by leaking it to the
media - including alleged pics of it tossed on a floor. They inferred and
leaked existence whether it be true or not. They wrongfully decided they
had the right to determine "need to know", and to further disseminate that
information.

That's dead wrong what they did and they should be held to a strict
accounting for it. The most junior intel non-rate knows better than that.
In some countries they would already be marched out to the woods and given
a lead injection in their heads.

So don't give me any of your high and mighty "I sucked off 4 different
Admirals" horseshit about knowing all about security measures and
classifications. If you really did, as much as you'd hate it, you'd be
defending Trump's uncompromised possession of the material (Until the DOJ
/ FBI screwed it up.) - safeguarded by Secret Service Agents.

[AlleyCat]

Actually, you're a squat-to-piss fairy.

[dot]

On 03 Sep 2022, Bud Frawley <bud_fr...@aggregoat.con> posted some
news:V7TQK.31145$elEa....@fx09.iad:

Go fetch, Rudy (Jonathan Ball aka other socks). Come on you non-serving
UCLA gayrilla economics Phd. Show us what a he-man you are and go get that
folder for Merrick Garland.

Here's a picture.

<https://crooksandliars.com/files/primary_image/22/09/classified.png>

Maybe the FBI doesn't know it's there and MSNBC hasn't told them. You'll
be a Liz Cheney hero for about 15 seconds. Maybe she'll give you a
blowjob.

"On Friday, it was revealed that among the folders found at Donald Trump's
Florida resort, Mar-a-Lago, were 48 empty folders marked “classified.”"

[governo...@gmail.com]

It's also proof that Trump was mishandling classified information.
"I think I'll take a copy of our nuclear submarine deployments to New
York with me. I promised it to Russia's UN ambassador."

Swill
--
Trump's lament . . .
It didn't happen.
Ok, it did but not that way.
Ok, it happened that way but it's not illegal.
Ok, it's illegal but *I* didn't do it.
LOCK'ERUP!MAKEAMERICAGREATAGAIN!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FA8njRCVIAUbATE?format=jpg&name=large

[George Plimpton]

On 9/3/2022 11:14 AM, dot wrote:
> On 03 Sep 2022, Technobarbarian <technobarbar...@gmail.com>
> posted some news:tf01un$f3h$1...@gioia.aioe.org:
>
>>
>> Folder Marked 'Classified' On Display In Bar At Trump Tower
>
> So what?
>
> I have 20+ folders marked "Confidential" "Secret" and "Top Secret" in a
> box in my garage.

Bullshit.

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 04:36:20 -0000 (UTC), dot <290...@35W.82N> wrote:

>Merrick Garland and the FBI have already violated the most basic
>principles of safeguarding classified information by leaking it to the
>media - including alleged pics of it tossed on a floor. They inferred and
>leaked existence whether it be true or not. They wrongfully decided they
>had the right to determine "need to know", and to further disseminate that
>information.

You are quite wrong. No classified text was displayed.

[governo...@gmail.com]

On Sun, 4 Sep 2022 09:44:26 -0700, George Plimpton <geor...@si.not>
wrote:

j/k Miss Thing.