Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Is Another Holocaust Coming?
196 views
Skip to first unread message
Michael Ejercito
Dec 31, 2011, 2:20:02 PM12/31/11
to
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
Is Another Holocaust Coming?
The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
By Bill Narvey
What? Another Holocaust could be just around the bend?
Renowned conservative pundit, Mark Steyn sure seems to think so.
An article, December 6th, 2011 in The Jewish Tribune out of Toronto by
Joanne Hill, that likely has not received the attention it deserves,
certainly raises the specter of another genocidal holocaust against
the Jews, Western society complicit: Resurgence in antisemitism may
lead to second Holocaust, Steyn says.
Hill was reporting on a recent address by Steyn to about 1,000 people
gathered at Toronto’s Reform Jewish synagogue, Holy Blossom Temple,
which focused on resurgent antisemitism, particularly in Europe.
The article’s title is taken from Steyn’s startling dire warning of
what the future may hold for us Jews.
Hysteria? Fear mongering? Maybe, but to what purpose and what is in it
for Steyn who is not Jewish?
Then again, taking a closer look at all the signs, maybe not.
Maybe Steyn is spot on and what we are witnessing is the world stage
being set for a final one act Holocaust reality play that will
ultimately see the world rid of Israel and the Jews, once and for all.
So, what are these signs?
Jews know that the most ancient of evils, Jew hatred that has taken an
unimaginable toll on the Jewish people throughout the millennia, is
extant today.
They know that while intractable and unbridled Jew hatred, be it in
its purest form or in the guise of Israel hatred, while coming mostly
from the Muslim world, is also coming from parts of the Christian and
other non-Muslim world.
That millennial old Christian Jew hatred, in recent years has been
resurgent as Steyn notes, especially in Europe where Jew hatred is
finding increasing expression by word and deed, not just from ordinary
citizens, but from European religious, institutional, media and
political leaders.
Most, if not all 3rd world non-Muslim countries that have historically
had little experience or even contact with Jews and Israel, have for a
number of reasons, all bad, found common cause with Muslim nations in
their hatred of Jews and Israel.
China, a rising economic powerhouse, also having little to no
historical experience and contact with Jews, is aligning with the
Muslims, largely because of economic opportunities the Muslim world
affords them.
Similarly Eastern Europe, led by Russia, the evil empire as Regan
called it, has a very long history of systemic Jew hatred throughout
all levels of its society, again seeks to regain world superpower
status by cozying up to the Muslim world where it finds many economic
opportunities and by trying to build itself up, largely at the West’s
expense.
The former Soviet Union, armed the Arabs against Israel as has both
Russia and China since. It is Russia that provided Iran the technology
and assistance to develop its nuclear program. Both Russia and China
have been instrumental in throwing sand in the gears of Western
efforts to bring pressure on Iran through largely economic sanctions,
to get Iran to abandon their nuclear agenda and WMD aspirations.
Incidentally, Europe that is so dependent on Iranian crude and fearful
of blowback should they support sanctions against Iran, have always
been wishy washy in that regard and now have announced they are not
supportive of sanctions.
Iran talks out of both sides of its mouth when it denies it has any
WMD aspirations (a denial that is undeniably false), but maintains its
threatening posture and words that it is dedicated to wiping Israel
off the map. Add to that, Iran is the greatest sponsor of Islamic
Jihad, arming them to not only attack Israel, but the West.
As for Jews – well Holocaust denying Iran, if it can pull the trigger
on its goal of bringing a Holocaust to Israel, will be bringing that
Holocaust to Jews the world over.
At least the Soviets during the cold war were rational enough to know
that a nuclear war with the West would destroy both, so the concept of
M.A.D. held the Soviets in check. For Islamic Iran however, the
concept of M.A.D. does not enter into the calculation of their
national interests and aspirations.
Iran’s leaders are moved only by their religion of Islam to believe
that their religious prophecies leading to Islamic world supremacy can
only be realized by their leading a deadly apocalyptic showdown with
the non-Muslim world, with Israel being the first to go, regardless of
how many Muslims must die in the process.
The American led industrialized West, so dependent on Arab oil for
almost a century has made itself increasingly vulnerable to the power
of Arab oil and wealth.
That economic reality was painfully brought home to the West with the
Saudi led oil embargo of 1973 as payback for American and Western
support of Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War that enabled Israel
to avert being destroyed by the Jew hating genocidal minded Arabs.
That unforgotten lesson and the strong likelihood that the Arabs will
use such tactic again if American support of Israel exceeds the
tolerance level of Arab Jew haters, weighs heavy on American and
Western minds.
America and the West repeatedly declare as a mantra that the vast
majority of Muslims are good and decent people, while it is only a
relatively very small number of Jihadists that threaten the West. The
West knows full well however, that the majority, if not vast majority
of the Muslim world are not only Jew haters, but a very great many of
them have some sympathies at least, with the Jihadists who express and
act on their profound hatred of Jews, Israel and the West.
Fear of hostile and violent Muslim reaction against Western interests
in the Muslim Middle East as well as on Western soil, is palpable.
That fear too, figures largely in American and Western thinking,
positions, policies and actions intended to protect and advance
Western interests in the Muslim world and which have a corresponding
negative impact on Israel.
These Western policies that have been rightly called appeasement, have
been evidenced in the anti-Israel rhetoric and deeds of many Western
leaders and media organizations and in Pres. Obama’s various
pronouncements such as his apology speech to Al Arabiyya, his Cairo
apology tour, his Mid East policies and his continuously singling out
Israel to wring concessions from and to blame for the Israel-
Palestinian peace process going off the rails as well as on a number
of other counts.
What is also significant is that pervasive intractable Arab,
Palestinian and Muslim Jew hatred and even their hatred of the West,
barely gets mentioned these days, though it is the core reason why
Israel has not managed to find a peace solution with the Palestinians
and other Arab neighbors and a core reason that puts Western interests
in jeopardy.
One cannot ignore as well that the recent upheavals in the Middle East
that began in Tunisia, have not led to an Arab Spring ushering in
democracy, that the West hoped for. Rather, these upheavals have
opened the door for Jew and Western hating Islamists to seize power
and drag their people further back into Islamic and Jihadist tyranny.
If that was not enough, Jew hatred is now a full blown sentiment and
inspiration for words and deeds of the non-religious secular left
wing, so numerous in Western nations.
Why any Jew would want to be affiliated with these left wingers is
mind boggling, but many are in one way or another. Go figure!
Can Jews and Israel be saved by the mega millions of Christians, who
contrary to some of their Christian brethren, are staunch friends and
supporters of Jews and Israel? Maybe, but then again maybe not.
It is no comfort to Jews that Christians don’t even seem willing to
stand up for fellow Christians, persecuted in Muslim lands of which
there have been increasing reports over the last several decades.
Consider Raymond Ibrahim’s article Muslim Persecution of Christians:
November 2011 at: http://www.hudson-ny.org/2676/muslim-persecution-of-christians-november-2011
summarizing only some recent instances of hate filled treatment of
minority Christians in a number of Muslim nations. There are countless
such reports in a similar vein.
The Pope in his recent Christmas address called in banal terms for
peace in the world and good will to all, specifically mentioning peace
for Israel and Palestinians, but he uttered not a word about Muslim
persecution of Christians.
God on High must be shaking his head and sneering in disgust at this
Pope who pompously claims to be the Vickar of Christ in this world.
Not to just beat up on the Pope, but Christian leaders and their
flocks have simply not come together to fight against this lethal
scourge of hatred that so many fellow Christians are being subjected
to in a number of Muslim lands.
Perhaps Christians have a sense of security from and are comforted by
their numbers of 2.6 million and figure they can afford to lose 1, 10
or even 100 million of their flock and barely notice the loss.
Jews however, number just 13 million. It is no overstatement to say
that Jews can ill afford to lose even one Jew to Jew hatred, let alone
all of Israel, if Iran and other Jew hating Arab nations and
Palestinians had their way.
In spite of all these ominous signs that portend potential existential
disaster for Jews and Israel, Jews seem to be more consumed with
arguing and fighting over their differing theological, political and
ideological differing views on Judaism, Israel and American led
Western leadership as it relates to Jews and Israel. Those factional
fractious and often hostile and angry opposing views, only serve to
injuriously divide and weaken the Jewish community at large and
distract it from clearly seeing and reacting to the millennial threat
of Jew hatred that is again on the rise and again existentially
threatens us all.
The foregoing is only a summary of signs that a confluence of factors
are fast coalescing to make a perfect Jew hating storm that could lead
to yet another Holocaust for the Jews and Israel, while the West, for
reasons of protecting its own interests, could choose to just stand by
and let happen.
If Jews are not totally alarmed by the foregoing summary of signs,
they need only do a simple internet search with key words to bring up
countless pages of links to news reports and articles that will flesh
out these signs with so many detailed proofs that Jews will not be
able to deny these signs that impending doom could be near.
Yes, it is comforting for Jews to wishfully think and hope that the
existential dangers of Jew hatred are not as bad as they seem, that
another Holocaust just cannot happen, that coincidence will smile on
and spare Jews and Israel or believe, as an article of faith, that God
will intervene in a timely fashion to save Jews and Israel and ensure
their survival now and forever.
All these comforting thoughts are understandable, but can Jews really
afford to find comfort in willful blindness, hopes and prayers and
thus figure they have the luxury of time on their hands to take a wait
and see attitude?
All the clear, unmistakable and ominous signs are screaming NO!
God helps those who help themselves and by God, Jews have no more
moments to spare before coming together now – right now, to begin to
fight to avert any chance of disaster befalling them, before that
chance is erased by the passage of time and changing circumstance.
Is Another Holocaust Coming?
The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
By Bill Narvey
What? Another Holocaust could be just around the bend?
Renowned conservative pundit, Mark Steyn sure seems to think so.
An article, December 6th, 2011 in The Jewish Tribune out of Toronto by
Joanne Hill, that likely has not received the attention it deserves,
certainly raises the specter of another genocidal holocaust against
the Jews, Western society complicit: Resurgence in antisemitism may
lead to second Holocaust, Steyn says.
Hill was reporting on a recent address by Steyn to about 1,000 people
gathered at Toronto’s Reform Jewish synagogue, Holy Blossom Temple,
which focused on resurgent antisemitism, particularly in Europe.
The article’s title is taken from Steyn’s startling dire warning of
what the future may hold for us Jews.
Hysteria? Fear mongering? Maybe, but to what purpose and what is in it
for Steyn who is not Jewish?
Then again, taking a closer look at all the signs, maybe not.
Maybe Steyn is spot on and what we are witnessing is the world stage
being set for a final one act Holocaust reality play that will
ultimately see the world rid of Israel and the Jews, once and for all.
So, what are these signs?
Jews know that the most ancient of evils, Jew hatred that has taken an
unimaginable toll on the Jewish people throughout the millennia, is
extant today.
They know that while intractable and unbridled Jew hatred, be it in
its purest form or in the guise of Israel hatred, while coming mostly
from the Muslim world, is also coming from parts of the Christian and
other non-Muslim world.
That millennial old Christian Jew hatred, in recent years has been
resurgent as Steyn notes, especially in Europe where Jew hatred is
finding increasing expression by word and deed, not just from ordinary
citizens, but from European religious, institutional, media and
political leaders.
Most, if not all 3rd world non-Muslim countries that have historically
had little experience or even contact with Jews and Israel, have for a
number of reasons, all bad, found common cause with Muslim nations in
their hatred of Jews and Israel.
China, a rising economic powerhouse, also having little to no
historical experience and contact with Jews, is aligning with the
Muslims, largely because of economic opportunities the Muslim world
affords them.
Similarly Eastern Europe, led by Russia, the evil empire as Regan
called it, has a very long history of systemic Jew hatred throughout
all levels of its society, again seeks to regain world superpower
status by cozying up to the Muslim world where it finds many economic
opportunities and by trying to build itself up, largely at the West’s
expense.
The former Soviet Union, armed the Arabs against Israel as has both
Russia and China since. It is Russia that provided Iran the technology
and assistance to develop its nuclear program. Both Russia and China
have been instrumental in throwing sand in the gears of Western
efforts to bring pressure on Iran through largely economic sanctions,
to get Iran to abandon their nuclear agenda and WMD aspirations.
Incidentally, Europe that is so dependent on Iranian crude and fearful
of blowback should they support sanctions against Iran, have always
been wishy washy in that regard and now have announced they are not
supportive of sanctions.
Iran talks out of both sides of its mouth when it denies it has any
WMD aspirations (a denial that is undeniably false), but maintains its
threatening posture and words that it is dedicated to wiping Israel
off the map. Add to that, Iran is the greatest sponsor of Islamic
Jihad, arming them to not only attack Israel, but the West.
As for Jews – well Holocaust denying Iran, if it can pull the trigger
on its goal of bringing a Holocaust to Israel, will be bringing that
Holocaust to Jews the world over.
At least the Soviets during the cold war were rational enough to know
that a nuclear war with the West would destroy both, so the concept of
M.A.D. held the Soviets in check. For Islamic Iran however, the
concept of M.A.D. does not enter into the calculation of their
national interests and aspirations.
Iran’s leaders are moved only by their religion of Islam to believe
that their religious prophecies leading to Islamic world supremacy can
only be realized by their leading a deadly apocalyptic showdown with
the non-Muslim world, with Israel being the first to go, regardless of
how many Muslims must die in the process.
The American led industrialized West, so dependent on Arab oil for
almost a century has made itself increasingly vulnerable to the power
of Arab oil and wealth.
That economic reality was painfully brought home to the West with the
Saudi led oil embargo of 1973 as payback for American and Western
support of Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War that enabled Israel
to avert being destroyed by the Jew hating genocidal minded Arabs.
That unforgotten lesson and the strong likelihood that the Arabs will
use such tactic again if American support of Israel exceeds the
tolerance level of Arab Jew haters, weighs heavy on American and
Western minds.
America and the West repeatedly declare as a mantra that the vast
majority of Muslims are good and decent people, while it is only a
relatively very small number of Jihadists that threaten the West. The
West knows full well however, that the majority, if not vast majority
of the Muslim world are not only Jew haters, but a very great many of
them have some sympathies at least, with the Jihadists who express and
act on their profound hatred of Jews, Israel and the West.
Fear of hostile and violent Muslim reaction against Western interests
in the Muslim Middle East as well as on Western soil, is palpable.
That fear too, figures largely in American and Western thinking,
positions, policies and actions intended to protect and advance
Western interests in the Muslim world and which have a corresponding
negative impact on Israel.
These Western policies that have been rightly called appeasement, have
been evidenced in the anti-Israel rhetoric and deeds of many Western
leaders and media organizations and in Pres. Obama’s various
pronouncements such as his apology speech to Al Arabiyya, his Cairo
apology tour, his Mid East policies and his continuously singling out
Israel to wring concessions from and to blame for the Israel-
Palestinian peace process going off the rails as well as on a number
of other counts.
What is also significant is that pervasive intractable Arab,
Palestinian and Muslim Jew hatred and even their hatred of the West,
barely gets mentioned these days, though it is the core reason why
Israel has not managed to find a peace solution with the Palestinians
and other Arab neighbors and a core reason that puts Western interests
in jeopardy.
One cannot ignore as well that the recent upheavals in the Middle East
that began in Tunisia, have not led to an Arab Spring ushering in
democracy, that the West hoped for. Rather, these upheavals have
opened the door for Jew and Western hating Islamists to seize power
and drag their people further back into Islamic and Jihadist tyranny.
If that was not enough, Jew hatred is now a full blown sentiment and
inspiration for words and deeds of the non-religious secular left
wing, so numerous in Western nations.
Why any Jew would want to be affiliated with these left wingers is
mind boggling, but many are in one way or another. Go figure!
Can Jews and Israel be saved by the mega millions of Christians, who
contrary to some of their Christian brethren, are staunch friends and
supporters of Jews and Israel? Maybe, but then again maybe not.
It is no comfort to Jews that Christians don’t even seem willing to
stand up for fellow Christians, persecuted in Muslim lands of which
there have been increasing reports over the last several decades.
Consider Raymond Ibrahim’s article Muslim Persecution of Christians:
November 2011 at: http://www.hudson-ny.org/2676/muslim-persecution-of-christians-november-2011
summarizing only some recent instances of hate filled treatment of
minority Christians in a number of Muslim nations. There are countless
such reports in a similar vein.
The Pope in his recent Christmas address called in banal terms for
peace in the world and good will to all, specifically mentioning peace
for Israel and Palestinians, but he uttered not a word about Muslim
persecution of Christians.
God on High must be shaking his head and sneering in disgust at this
Pope who pompously claims to be the Vickar of Christ in this world.
Not to just beat up on the Pope, but Christian leaders and their
flocks have simply not come together to fight against this lethal
scourge of hatred that so many fellow Christians are being subjected
to in a number of Muslim lands.
Perhaps Christians have a sense of security from and are comforted by
their numbers of 2.6 million and figure they can afford to lose 1, 10
or even 100 million of their flock and barely notice the loss.
Jews however, number just 13 million. It is no overstatement to say
that Jews can ill afford to lose even one Jew to Jew hatred, let alone
all of Israel, if Iran and other Jew hating Arab nations and
Palestinians had their way.
In spite of all these ominous signs that portend potential existential
disaster for Jews and Israel, Jews seem to be more consumed with
arguing and fighting over their differing theological, political and
ideological differing views on Judaism, Israel and American led
Western leadership as it relates to Jews and Israel. Those factional
fractious and often hostile and angry opposing views, only serve to
injuriously divide and weaken the Jewish community at large and
distract it from clearly seeing and reacting to the millennial threat
of Jew hatred that is again on the rise and again existentially
threatens us all.
The foregoing is only a summary of signs that a confluence of factors
are fast coalescing to make a perfect Jew hating storm that could lead
to yet another Holocaust for the Jews and Israel, while the West, for
reasons of protecting its own interests, could choose to just stand by
and let happen.
If Jews are not totally alarmed by the foregoing summary of signs,
they need only do a simple internet search with key words to bring up
countless pages of links to news reports and articles that will flesh
out these signs with so many detailed proofs that Jews will not be
able to deny these signs that impending doom could be near.
Yes, it is comforting for Jews to wishfully think and hope that the
existential dangers of Jew hatred are not as bad as they seem, that
another Holocaust just cannot happen, that coincidence will smile on
and spare Jews and Israel or believe, as an article of faith, that God
will intervene in a timely fashion to save Jews and Israel and ensure
their survival now and forever.
All these comforting thoughts are understandable, but can Jews really
afford to find comfort in willful blindness, hopes and prayers and
thus figure they have the luxury of time on their hands to take a wait
and see attitude?
All the clear, unmistakable and ominous signs are screaming NO!
God helps those who help themselves and by God, Jews have no more
moments to spare before coming together now – right now, to begin to
fight to avert any chance of disaster befalling them, before that
chance is erased by the passage of time and changing circumstance.
Freedom Man
Dec 31, 2011, 2:31:08 PM12/31/11
to
Those that fail to learn the lessons of history are doomed to have history
repeat.
The Jews, among others, have failed to learn those lessons!
repeat.
The Jews, among others, have failed to learn those lessons!
Nancy
Dec 31, 2011, 4:24:35 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31, 2:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
~~~
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
Nancy
I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming. Couls it because
they are listening to external forces
such as the USA and the UK and these nations will betray them,
maybe....or is it because they cannot come to a united
decision....maybe.
I believe it is because they have not lisened to their God. The wars
Almighty God ensured for them to win.....they have turned around and
given the land away, the Temple Mound and the Sinai Peninsul....they
stopped when they were winning.
And now the USA wants Isreal to ~partner for peace~ with the muslims
over Jerusalem....no one has the right to barter for God's City
Jerusalem....should Israel do this there will be a blood-bath and God
will move another group of people into Jerusalem that will take a
stand and fight for her.....they will be known as The Son's of
Jerusalem.
Kickboxer ®™
Dec 31, 2011, 6:38:11 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31 2011, 9:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
holders.
The level of hate can reach a critical level at which point the global
perception of Israel will shift into something negative.
But I am skeptical about the claims of the author. The reason for this
is because Israel has nuclear weapons and can protect Jews from any
physical threat. Even if all Muslim countries were to attack, they
would be turned into glass.
I agree that hate is dangerous. But don't forget that weapons can
protect against hate.
wrote:
Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
holders.
The level of hate can reach a critical level at which point the global
perception of Israel will shift into something negative.
But I am skeptical about the claims of the author. The reason for this
is because Israel has nuclear weapons and can protect Jews from any
physical threat. Even if all Muslim countries were to attack, they
would be turned into glass.
I agree that hate is dangerous. But don't forget that weapons can
protect against hate.
Nancy
Dec 31, 2011, 7:01:04 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31, 6:38 pm, Kickboxer ®™ <greeceisgettingric...@gmail.com>
wrote:
~~~
Nancy
All it is going to take is for one man to come along and unite the
arabs....and come he will...sooner rather than later.
Life means nothing to the arabs....they do not hesitate to kill their
own people to reach their goal.....they fear nothing Israel has....
wrote:
Nancy
All it is going to take is for one man to come along and unite the
arabs....and come he will...sooner rather than later.
Life means nothing to the arabs....they do not hesitate to kill their
own people to reach their goal.....they fear nothing Israel has....
A Moose in Love
Dec 31, 2011, 7:14:55 PM12/31/11
to
> On Dec 31 2011, 9:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
> due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
> Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
> following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
> holders.
The reason people support the Palestinian people is not brought on by
> wrote:
>
> >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
> due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
> Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
> following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
> holders.
hatred of innocent Jews. They do not like what has been done to the
Palestinians. So don't try your lying propaganda shit here.
A Moose in Love
Dec 31, 2011, 7:08:59 PM12/31/11
to
'moved' into Palestine? Arab lives meant nothing. It's there, hiding
in plain sight.
Nancy
Dec 31, 2011, 8:15:40 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31, 7:08 pm, A Moose in Love <parkstreetboo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> in plain sight.- Hide quoted text -
~~~
Nancy
No, it is not propaganda. They have and would sacrifice men, women and
children to blow up
a few Jews or Christians....you might add Americans in there, too.
Arabs have no ~rights~ being
parked out in the Promised Land, period. You can get angry and rant
all you want...this is what
God says.
wrote:
~~~
Nancy
No, it is not propaganda. They have and would sacrifice men, women and
children to blow up
a few Jews or Christians....you might add Americans in there, too.
Arabs have no ~rights~ being
parked out in the Promised Land, period. You can get angry and rant
all you want...this is what
God says.
dsharavi
Dec 31, 2011, 8:47:04 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31, 4:08 pm, A Moose in Love <parkstreetboo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Far better than Arabs treated Jews.
wrote:
dsharavi
Dec 31, 2011, 8:48:13 PM12/31/11
to
On Dec 31, 4:14 pm, A Moose in Love <parkstreetboo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> They do not like what has been done to the
> Palestinians.
Jew haters don't give a damn what has -- or has not --- been done to
the "palestinians".
wrote:
> On Dec 31, 6:38 pm, Kickboxer ®™ <greeceisgettingric...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31 2011, 9:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > > Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
> > due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
> > Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
> > following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
> > holders.
>
> The reason people support the Palestinian people is not brought on by
> hatred of innocent Jews.
99.9% of that "support" comes from Jew haters.
> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 31 2011, 9:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > > Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
> > due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
> > Rense.com receives several million views monthly and has a loyal
> > following. The viewer demographic is mostly men, affluent and Degree
> > holders.
>
> The reason people support the Palestinian people is not brought on by
> hatred of innocent Jews.
> They do not like what has been done to the
> Palestinians.
the "palestinians".
Student
Dec 31, 2011, 9:05:40 PM12/31/11
to
> 99.9% of that "support" comes from Jew haters.
>
>> They do not like what has been done to the
>> Palestinians.
>
> Jew haters don't give a damn what has -- or has not --- been done to
> the "palestinians".
I still cannot figure out how an educated and financially successful group
can be so callous and insesitive to human suffering.
Has the Holocaust screwed up their minds beyond repair?
Student.
Dejnisimo
Dec 31, 2011, 11:51:07 PM12/31/11
to
"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
There was never a former.
Dejnisimo
Dec 31, 2011, 11:54:01 PM12/31/11
to
"Kickboxer ŽT" <greeceisge...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5b563df7-e94e-47aa...@f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
On Dec 31 2011, 9:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
>due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
>Rense.com receives several million views monthly
The Jews own most of the world's major media outlets. They have billions of
wrote:
> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>Anti Jew hate often masking as support for "palestine" grows rapidly
>due to easy access to Internet, and sites like Rense.com and RT.
>Rense.com receives several million views monthly
reader/watchers a day.
>I agree that hate is dangerous.
hate everything not Jewish.
mirjam
Dec 31, 2011, 11:55:15 PM12/31/11
to
The only Refugees who can bequeath their refugee status to their
children are Arabs who happened to live under the British Mandate in
Israel for 2 years before the British left ...[many of those Arabs
were workers for/of the British Army .
While about a million Jewish refugees from Arab countries never got a
Refugee Status and Jews who were refugees in Europe after WW2 got only
a short time refugee status ,,,
All the Jewish Refugees whether acknowledged by URAWA or nor worked
hard to build a life for themselves [ourself]
The so called Arab Refugees are provided for Life they and their
children and great great children by the UNRAWA
PS the R in this term says rehabilitation which they never did ..
A huge group of Politicians and Radical leaders Use/ed the Status of
Refugees and and built themselves a tribe of haters they can use to
spread hate and terror instead of living a good life ,,,
mirjam ,,,
children are Arabs who happened to live under the British Mandate in
Israel for 2 years before the British left ...[many of those Arabs
were workers for/of the British Army .
While about a million Jewish refugees from Arab countries never got a
Refugee Status and Jews who were refugees in Europe after WW2 got only
a short time refugee status ,,,
All the Jewish Refugees whether acknowledged by URAWA or nor worked
hard to build a life for themselves [ourself]
The so called Arab Refugees are provided for Life they and their
children and great great children by the UNRAWA
PS the R in this term says rehabilitation which they never did ..
A huge group of Politicians and Radical leaders Use/ed the Status of
Refugees and and built themselves a tribe of haters they can use to
spread hate and terror instead of living a good life ,,,
mirjam ,,,
The Revd
Jan 1, 2012, 6:43:45 AM1/1/12
to
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:24:35 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com>
wrote:
>On Dec 31, 2:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>>
>> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>>
>> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>
>~~~
>Nancy
>
>I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
I certainly hope so. It's long overjew [sic].
wrote:
>On Dec 31, 2:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>>
>> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>>
>> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>
>~~~
>Nancy
>
>I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
The Revd
Jan 1, 2012, 6:45:45 AM1/1/12
to
shrinks in NYC are jews. So are their patients.
The Peeler
Jan 1, 2012, 7:39:48 AM1/1/12
to
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:43:45 -0500, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>>~~~
>>Nancy
>>
>>I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>
> I certainly hope so. It's long overjew [sic].
Well, you can keep fantasizing about it in your dark stinking room for as
long as you want, you hilarious housebound impotent cripple with nothing but
a big mouth! LOL
--
The top 5 truths about our resident psychopath, The Rectum:
the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
>>~~~
>>Nancy
>>
>>I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>
> I certainly hope so. It's long overjew [sic].
long as you want, you hilarious housebound impotent cripple with nothing but
a big mouth! LOL
--
The top 5 truths about our resident psychopath, The Rectum:
the desperate psycho can't SLEEP anymore,
he can't get out of the house anymore,
he got NOBODY to talk to anymore,
he can't FUCK anymore,
he got no life outside Usenet AT ALL!
The Peeler
Jan 1, 2012, 7:40:21 AM1/1/12
to
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 06:45:45 -0500, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
can't make it out of the house anymore and whose miserable "existence" on
Usenet is EVERYTHING, really EVERYTHING, he got!
LMAO!
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
farted:
.
>>
>>Has the Holocaust screwed up their minds beyond repair?
>
> They have a genetic predisposition for mental illness. Most of the
> shrinks in NYC are jews. So are their patients.
This coming from a certified mentally handicapped and psychotic idiot who
>>
>>Has the Holocaust screwed up their minds beyond repair?
>
> They have a genetic predisposition for mental illness. Most of the
> shrinks in NYC are jews. So are their patients.
can't make it out of the house anymore and whose miserable "existence" on
Usenet is EVERYTHING, really EVERYTHING, he got!
LMAO!
A Moose in Love
Jan 1, 2012, 9:02:19 AM1/1/12
to
> parked out in the Promised Land, period.'
?A statement like that shows pure hatred. And let us hear this
mythical creature you refer to as God. Let us hear God give his/her/
it's opinion. No? But God talked to you right?
Nancy
Jan 1, 2012, 10:00:18 AM1/1/12
to
Nancy
No, you really don't.....what is to come on the Jews.....will come on
the West and much of Europe.
Nancy
Jan 1, 2012, 9:58:50 AM1/1/12
to
>
~~~
Nancy
Well, kinda....but He really talks to the Messenger. This is the
Messenger that is to come before the Messiah comes. He is a Levite and
it is just before time for him to take his stand.
Go, educate yourself, God willing, on what is to come on Israel...all
of Israel, not just the Tribe of Judah.
www.zionministry.com/Malachi/Milachi.htm
This man is the only voice I've heard crying out....what is to come.
Topaz
Jan 1, 2012, 1:14:15 PM1/1/12
to
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.
Scholars challenge Holocaust story
Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.
The Auschwitz camps
The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.
The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.
Four million victims?
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)
Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)
Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)
And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.
The Höss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.
Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)
Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the Höss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.
The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence
Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish inmates unable to work
For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)
These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)
Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)
Anne Frank
Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.
Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied propaganda
The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.
Allied planes dropped large numbers of LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)
Survivor testimony
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.
Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)
Inmates released
Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)
Himmler orders death rate reduced
In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.
The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."
Furthermore, it ordered:
The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.
Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)
German camp regulations
Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)
New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.
Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.
The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.
Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.
Telltale aerial photos
Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)
Gassing expert refutes extermination story
America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.
Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.
In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)
Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)
www.ihr.org
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
dsharavi
Jan 1, 2012, 2:05:31 PM1/1/12
to
On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
Mark Weber is an antisemitic propagandist.
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
Michael Ejercito
Jan 1, 2012, 2:36:35 PM1/1/12
to
On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
>
How does a Holocaust happen?
> by Mark Weber
>
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Herald
March 30, 1992
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5710/how-does-a-holocaust-happen
ONE DAY 16 OR 17 YEARS AGO, my father, who rarely blows up over
anything, lost his temper over a piece of bread.
It was lunchtime, and my siblings and I were goofing around at the
table. One of us, in play, threw a slice of bread at another. My
father exploded.
"What's the matter with you? That's food! Don't you ever let me see
you treat food like again!"
I remember being startled by his angry outburst. The words, however,
didn't really register. It wasn't until much later -- years later --
that I finally understood that flash of anger: To a man who has lived
through hunger, seen those around him die of starvation, nearly
starved to death himself -- to such a man, a piece of bread is not a
joke.
On Passover, which ended a few days ago, observant Jews do not eat
ordinary bread. Instead they eat matzo -- the dry, flat, unleavened
"bread of affliction" meant to remind them of their forebears'
deliverance from slavery in Egypt. At the ceremonial Passover meal,
they read aloud from the Haggadah, which tells the story of the
Exodus:
For in every single generation, they rise against us to annihilate
us.
In all the generations of Jewish history, never did "they" come as
close to succeeding as the Germans did in this very century, one brief
generation ago.
On the last day of Passover in 1944, the Nazis arrived in my father's
village of Legina -- a microscopic dot in the Slovak countryside, hard
by the border with Hungary. The knock on the Jakubovices' window came
on a Sunday morning before daybreak; like Legina's other Jews, they
were ordered to gather their things and be ready to leave in half an
hour's time. They were put on horse-drawn wagons and carried to
Satoraljaujhely ("Ujhely" for short), a large Hungarian town a few
miles away.
For six weeks, they stayed in Ujhely's Jewish ghetto, which grew
increasingly crowded as Jews from all over the region were brought in.
After a month, the transports began. A tenth of the ghetto's
population was removed at a time; my father and his family were taken
away in the third transport. On a Thursday, with only the belongings
they could carry by hand, they and 3,000 other Jews were marched
through the streets to the train station -- to the waiting boxcars. As
each car filled, its doors were chained and padlocked.
They were bound for a place called Auschwitz.
The train heading north into Poland, my father assumed, was taking him
and his family and the other Jews who'd been corralled into Ujhely to
a work site somewhere.
How could he have known otherwise?
How could he have guessed that he and all those boxcars crammed with
Jews were just a tiny fragment of the vast works that had been
constructed to annihilate the Jews of Europe? How could he have
understood that all over the continent, Jews by the millions were
being uprooted from their homelands -- lands, in some cases, where
Jews had dwelled for 900 years -- to be sent to special killing
grounds where all the science, industry, and manpower at Germany's
command would be pooled for purposes of quickly and efficiently
exterminating them? How could he have imagined that the world would
allow this horror to take place -- a horror so unprecedented that a
new word, genocide, had to be invented to contain it? How could he
have dreamed that in less than seven years, two out of every three
Jews in Europe would be a corpse, or the ashes of a corpse?
The train out of Ujhely moved for three days. It stopped early on a
Sunday morning, six weeks exactly since that knock on the window in
Legina. The doors were unchained. Suddenly there were screaming
guards, barking dogs, floodlights. The boxcar opened onto a ramp, at
the top of which a man with a crop in his hand waved people to the
right and to the left.
My grandparents, David and Leah Jakubovic, were waved to the right. So
were their 10-year-old son, Yrvin, and 8-year-old daughter, Alice.
They died in the gas chamber that day.
My father's teen-aged brother, Zoltan, was gassed a few days later.
His sister Franceska suffered horribly for a while; she died the
following spring.
Somehow my father survived Auschwitz, the death march to Mauthausen,
the camps at Melk and Ebensee. Somehow he survived the typhoid fever,
the unstoppable diarrhea, the starvation that reduced him -- at 19
years of age -- to 65 pounds.
I cannot explain the miracle of his survival, let alone the fact that
he can still laugh, and love. That was -- is -- God's doing.
But the Holocaust was man's. The Germans could get away with
systematically butchering 6 million Jews because good men and women,
through their indifference, let them get away with it.
For in every single generation generation, they rise against us to
annihilate us.
Today is Holocaust Remembrance Day, a part of the struggle against
indifference, a reminder that what could never happen has happened.
And can again.
For only one thing can stop a holocaust: memory. On this one day, at
least, let us remember the millions of innocents who died, and honor
the few who survived. But above all let us reflect, if only briefly,
that in the end nothing can shield us from the building of a new
Auschwitz except our undimmed rage at the old Auschwitz.
(Jeff Jacoby is the Boston Herald's chief editorial writer.)
Michael Ejercito
Jan 1, 2012, 2:36:18 PM1/1/12
to
On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> There was never a former.
Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
> >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> There was never a former.
M-Gyier
Jan 1, 2012, 3:36:36 PM1/1/12
to
In article <rlh0g7lpsbuj9ql86...@4ax.com>,
shiteating limey bastard.
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
> I certainly hope so.
The muzzies will kill you and buttfuck your ugly "women",
>> I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
> I certainly hope so.
shiteating limey bastard.
M-Gyier
Jan 1, 2012, 3:39:55 PM1/1/12
to
In article <rph0g7tls09sgg14f...@4ax.com>,
British youth -- the worst scum on the planet, says renowned writer
http://tinyurl.com/3w3uynh
The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
> They have a genetic predisposition for mental illness.
Limeys? Sure. They're the scum of the Earth...
> They have a genetic predisposition for mental illness.
British youth -- the worst scum on the planet, says renowned writer
http://tinyurl.com/3w3uynh
The Revd
Jan 1, 2012, 4:51:00 PM1/1/12
to
On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 07:00:18 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com> wrote:
>On Jan 1, 6:43�am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:24:35 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Dec 31, 2:20�pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>>
>> >> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>>
>> >> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>>
>> >~~~
>> >Nancy
>>
>> >I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>>
>> I certainly hope so. �It's long overjew [sic].
>
>~~~
>Nancy
>
>No, you really don't
Yes, I really do. Fuck 'em.
>On Jan 1, 6:43�am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:24:35 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Dec 31, 2:20�pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>>
>> >> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>>
>> >> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>>
>> >~~~
>> >Nancy
>>
>> >I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>>
>> I certainly hope so. �It's long overjew [sic].
>
>~~~
>Nancy
>
>No, you really don't
>.....what is to come on the Jews.....will come on
>the West and much of Europe.
The Peeler
Jan 1, 2012, 5:37:44 PM1/1/12
to
On Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:51:00 -0500, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
You simply have no qualms AT ALL about making a complete ass of yourself
with every single post of yours, eh, "The Rectum"?
Not that you could afford having any qualms! LOL
--
The Rectum, posting as The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe, supports sex with
cows:
"If you or I tried to fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It
should not only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative
lifestyle."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/tree/browse_frm/month/2003-09/ef8cdceb7bc57ff1?rnum=81&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.activism%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2003-09%3F
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
<snip our resident psychopath's usual hysterical and psychotic garbage>
farted:
You simply have no qualms AT ALL about making a complete ass of yourself
with every single post of yours, eh, "The Rectum"?
Not that you could afford having any qualms! LOL
--
The Rectum, posting as The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe, supports sex with
cows:
"If you or I tried to fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice? It
should not only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative
lifestyle."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.activism/tree/browse_frm/month/2003-09/ef8cdceb7bc57ff1?rnum=81&_done=%2Fgroup%2Falt.activism%2Fbrowse_frm%2Fmonth%2F2003-09%3F
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 4:14:42 AM1/2/12
to
"Nancy" <nw...@live.com> wrote in message
news:a3bb20c6-c242-4f93...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
conflict. Just as they engineered two previous events.
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 4:21:42 AM1/2/12
to
"dsharavi" <dsha...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:2c8e5c2a-574b-4862...@e8g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
honest academic.
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 4:20:27 AM1/2/12
to
You are another like Sharavi. You take lies and twist them to try to make
sense.
You are a disgraceful example of what is wrong with Jews and Judaism.
"mirjam" <mir...@actcom.co.il> wrote in message
news:cc502899-a000-4bc3...@k28g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
sense.
You are a disgraceful example of what is wrong with Jews and Judaism.
"mirjam" <mir...@actcom.co.il> wrote in message
news:cc502899-a000-4bc3...@k28g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
TallHenry
Jan 2, 2012, 4:19:58 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f017495$0$30177$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Why are you murdering innocent people, aussie filth?
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/07/31/australia.woomera/
"CANBERRA, Australia (CNN) -- A United Nations human rights envoy
has slammed conditions in Australia's Woomera detention camp, saying
the situation there in many cases was 'inhuman and degrading'".
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/refu-o13.shtml
"Australian navy fires on refugee boat".
Australia's culpability in East Timor's genocide
------------------------------------------------
http://www.pcug.org.au/~wildwood/earlyviva.htm
"Australian governments all sought to influence the destiny of East
Timor. This destiny became one of the longest ongoing acts of genocide
since the European Holocaust of the Second World War. I am reminded of
the French Vichy Government of that war which supplied and organised
the freight train convoys that carried persecuted Jews to the Nazi
ovens. Canberra's warts-and-all allegiance with Jakarta; the almost $2
billion in bilateral aid; the million of dollars in military gifts,
defence training and defence co-operation; and the political lobbying
in the international arena for Jakarta's position, all helped to
create a similar cattlewagon, transporting the East Timorese to their
diabolical fate." Jim Aubrey, editor, 'Free East Timor: Australia's
culpability in East Timor's genocide'.
"The second consequence of British settlement was
appropriation of land and water resources. The combination
of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the
Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900.
A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier
of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas
of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities
reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes
of Australian communities or on lands considered unsuitable
for settlement".
(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians)
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Why are you murdering innocent people, aussie filth?
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/auspac/07/31/australia.woomera/
"CANBERRA, Australia (CNN) -- A United Nations human rights envoy
has slammed conditions in Australia's Woomera detention camp, saying
the situation there in many cases was 'inhuman and degrading'".
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/refu-o13.shtml
"Australian navy fires on refugee boat".
Australia's culpability in East Timor's genocide
------------------------------------------------
http://www.pcug.org.au/~wildwood/earlyviva.htm
"Australian governments all sought to influence the destiny of East
Timor. This destiny became one of the longest ongoing acts of genocide
since the European Holocaust of the Second World War. I am reminded of
the French Vichy Government of that war which supplied and organised
the freight train convoys that carried persecuted Jews to the Nazi
ovens. Canberra's warts-and-all allegiance with Jakarta; the almost $2
billion in bilateral aid; the million of dollars in military gifts,
defence training and defence co-operation; and the political lobbying
in the international arena for Jakarta's position, all helped to
create a similar cattlewagon, transporting the East Timorese to their
diabolical fate." Jim Aubrey, editor, 'Free East Timor: Australia's
culpability in East Timor's genocide'.
"The second consequence of British settlement was
appropriation of land and water resources. The combination
of disease, loss of land and direct violence reduced the
Aboriginal population by up to 80% between 1788 and 1900.
A wave of massacres and resistance followed the frontier
of British settlement. By the 1870s all the fertile areas
of Australia had been appropriated, and Indigenous communities
reduced to impoverished remnants living either on the fringes
of Australian communities or on lands considered unsuitable
for settlement".
(from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_Australians)
TallHenry
Jan 2, 2012, 4:20:41 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f0175ee$0$30141$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Silence, sick aussie filth.
http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=31983
"About 20 convicted Australian pedophiles unsuccessfully tried to
travel to Indonesia and Thailand immediately after the Dec. 26 tsunami
to prey on vulnerable children, a newspaper reported on Saturday."
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/austral.htm
"Child prostitution in Australia was studied by ECPAT, which collected
information from early 471 government and non-government agencies working
with children. The study, the first of its kind, revealed a vicious cycle
leading to child commercial sexual activities."
http://www.atimes.com/oceania/AC27Ah03.html
"It also confirmed suspicions the Pacific region has become a new target
for Australian pedophiles fleeing police crackdowns on child sex offences
at home and elsewhere in Asia."
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/11/1086749893067.html?from=moreStories
"Australian pedophiles are part of an organised crime ring preying on
Thailand's vulnerable children, writes Mark Baker."
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Silence, sick aussie filth.
http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=31983
"About 20 convicted Australian pedophiles unsuccessfully tried to
travel to Indonesia and Thailand immediately after the Dec. 26 tsunami
to prey on vulnerable children, a newspaper reported on Saturday."
http://www.uri.edu/artsci/wms/hughes/austral.htm
"Child prostitution in Australia was studied by ECPAT, which collected
information from early 471 government and non-government agencies working
with children. The study, the first of its kind, revealed a vicious cycle
leading to child commercial sexual activities."
http://www.atimes.com/oceania/AC27Ah03.html
"It also confirmed suspicions the Pacific region has become a new target
for Australian pedophiles fleeing police crackdowns on child sex offences
at home and elsewhere in Asia."
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/06/11/1086749893067.html?from=moreStories
"Australian pedophiles are part of an organised crime ring preying on
Thailand's vulnerable children, writes Mark Baker."
TallHenry
Jan 2, 2012, 4:21:15 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f017639$0$30310$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
hacked website:
http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
hacked website:
http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 4:27:12 AM1/2/12
to
news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
war on Germany.
Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
think of supporting these people.
On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> There was never a former.
> Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> There was never a former.
> Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
war on Germany.
Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
think of supporting these people.
TallHenry
Jan 2, 2012, 4:29:59 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f017783$0$30186$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Silence, aussie filth.
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Silence, aussie filth.
RJ11
Jan 2, 2012, 4:52:56 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f017495$0$30177$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
"Ben Cramer", posting as Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
(insane rants mercifully given the snip)
Do calm down, "Cramer". Soon, your little brother will arrive
with the new shipment, and everything will be fine.
"my younger Brother got me absolutely stoned on magic mushrooms.
I spent three days sitting in the corner of the tent waiting to come
down." -- the neo-Nazi "Ben Cramer" reflects on his usage of
hallucinatory drugs. Source:
Message-ID: <1125123267.5e5d281ad88798917af26011bcb01dc0@teranews>
There you go. That's a good lad.
RJ.
"Ben Cramer", posting as Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
(insane rants mercifully given the snip)
Do calm down, "Cramer". Soon, your little brother will arrive
with the new shipment, and everything will be fine.
"my younger Brother got me absolutely stoned on magic mushrooms.
I spent three days sitting in the corner of the tent waiting to come
down." -- the neo-Nazi "Ben Cramer" reflects on his usage of
hallucinatory drugs. Source:
Message-ID: <1125123267.5e5d281ad88798917af26011bcb01dc0@teranews>
There you go. That's a good lad.
RJ.
mirjam
Jan 2, 2012, 6:04:06 AM1/2/12
to
On Jan 2, 11:20 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> You are another like Sharavi. You take lies and twist them to try to make
I wish i had as much knowledge as Mrs Sharavi.
> You are another like Sharavi. You take lies and twist them to try to make
And as to the facts i brought, part of which are from personal
experience, after WW2 i was acknowledged as a refugee , for traveling
propose and some first aid medical help. Ever since than i took care
of myself
>
> You are a disgraceful example of what is wrong with Jews and Judaism.
mirjam
mirjam
Jan 2, 2012, 6:07:09 AM1/2/12
to
On Jan 2, 11:27 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
Interesting that you seem only to read books which are written to
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
attract scandalous attention , but lack ant serious research
mirjam
RJ11
Jan 2, 2012, 6:08:48 AM1/2/12
to
In article <85486878-7147-47f2...@k29g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
mirjam <mir...@actcom.co.il> wrote:
[...]
"Dejnisimo" is just another alias for the "Ben Cramer"
nazoid kook.
No need to take him seriously -- he happily admitted that
he's only here to troll:
"I'm not here to rebut anything or anyone, cuntface.
I'm here to antagonise and keep you occupied." -- "Ben Cramer"
Message-ID: <dv0e2v$l5a$1...@otis.netspace.net.au>.
RJ.
mirjam <mir...@actcom.co.il> wrote:
[...]
"Dejnisimo" is just another alias for the "Ben Cramer"
nazoid kook.
No need to take him seriously -- he happily admitted that
he's only here to troll:
"I'm not here to rebut anything or anyone, cuntface.
I'm here to antagonise and keep you occupied." -- "Ben Cramer"
Message-ID: <dv0e2v$l5a$1...@otis.netspace.net.au>.
RJ.
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 7:30:41 AM1/2/12
to
news:85486878-7147-47f2...@k29g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>And as to the facts i brought, part of which are from personal
>experience, after WW2 i was acknowledged as a refugee , for traveling
>propose and some first aid medical help. Ever since than i took care
>of myself
>
>> You are a disgraceful example of what is wrong with Jews and Judaism.
>Why ? because i speak the truth?
You are obviously a Jew. Jews do not do truth. Nor are you able to read and
understand.
On Jan 2, 11:20 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>> You are another like Sharavi. You take lies and twist them to try to make
>I wish i had as much knowledge as Mrs Sharavi.
No knowledge is needed. Just lies and nasty attitude.
>> You are another like Sharavi. You take lies and twist them to try to make
>I wish i had as much knowledge as Mrs Sharavi.
>And as to the facts i brought, part of which are from personal
>experience, after WW2 i was acknowledged as a refugee , for traveling
>propose and some first aid medical help. Ever since than i took care
>of myself
>
>> You are a disgraceful example of what is wrong with Jews and Judaism.
>Why ? because i speak the truth?
understand.
Dejnisimo
Jan 2, 2012, 7:32:01 AM1/2/12
to
news:ca906289-5731-40f3...@z19g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
Typicaly response from a Jew.
They are books which point out the nastiness and dangers of the Jew. They
are meticulously researched books.
You are a very, very nasty, dishonest old woman.
They are books which point out the nastiness and dangers of the Jew. They
are meticulously researched books.
You are a very, very nasty, dishonest old woman.
Anonymous
Jan 2, 2012, 7:47:22 AM1/2/12
to
news:e9c154be-bb99-4c8f...@q17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
>
>How does a Holocaust happen?
Jews started the last one. Ask them, stupid.
> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> by Mark Weber
>
>How does a Holocaust happen?
NoSpamAtAll
Jan 2, 2012, 8:28:07 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f01a284$0$30409$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
TallHenry
Jan 2, 2012, 8:28:50 AM1/2/12
to
In article <4f01a2d4$0$30140$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Topaz
Jan 2, 2012, 12:11:25 PM1/2/12
to
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
Topaz
Jan 2, 2012, 12:12:54 PM1/2/12
to
"Holocaust revisionism, ie, the examination of the supposed
genociding of Jews in the Third Reich. The generally-accepted version
of this event -- or, more properly, this NON-event -- is what I call
the Orthodox Jewish Version of the Holocaust, or OJV for short, which
holds in its present version that the nazis killed 'six million' Jews
in 'gas chambers'. As it happens, however, there are numerous problems
with the OJV. The following is a list of the major ones.
* The 'evidence' for the OJV consists primarily of the records of the
court proceedings of the Nuremberg trials. As it happens, however,
vengeful Jews were largely in charge of these trials. (According to
Louis Marshalko in his book The World Conquerers, of the 3000 persons
on the trial staff, 2400 were Jews.) Adding to the problem was the
fact that (1) there was no historical precedent for war crimes trials
in which only the vanquished were called to account for their actions;
and (2) these trials violated the fundamental principle of fairness
that no one is to be tried for violating a law that was instituted 'ex
post facto', ie, after the crime was committed.
* 'Confessions' used in the trial were highly dubious, since many were
extracted by torture or or other unethical means, such as threatening
the families of the accused (According to British scholar Vivian Bird,
more than one hundred German defendants had their testicles beaten to
a pulp by 'interrogators'.) Two confessions were particularly
egregious: That of Rudolf Hoss, commandant of Auschwitz, which was
(among other things) written in a language he did not even understand,
and which provided the major basis for the 'six million' figure; and
that of Kurt Gerstein, the dubiousness of which was the subject of a
French doctoral dissertation.
* Many of the atrocities that were seriously alleged at the trials are
now rejected by even establishment historians as false, the most
prominent of which are the stories that Jewish bodies were made into
soap and their skin was made into lampshades. Evidently such stories
were created as war propaganda, just as were similar stories in WW1
about 'Huns' who were 'bayonetting babies'.
* The defendants in the trials had no opportunity to gather evidence
in their defense, and in addition were often given poor food,
subjected to freezing weather without proper clothing, deprived of
sleep, and -- as stated earlier -- often brutally beaten. Furthermore,
those who were condemned to death had their sentences postponed until
they could be carried out on the Jewish High Holy Days in a sort of
'blood libel' celebration.
* The printed trial transcripts often do not match the trial
recordings, and were evidently deliberately changed to cover up
embarrassing facts brought out by defendants in their trials.
* Auschwitz was not a 'death camp', as alleged at the trials, but a
large industrial complex in Poland, and the inmates were forced
laborers. The nazis were desperate for labor, so it would have been
irrational for them to have 'gassed' anyone, and equally irrational
for them to have mistreated inmates or underfed them. In fact, there
was a special court, under SS Judge Konrad Morgen, to try complaints
against camp personnel for abusing inmates. Beyond this, Heinrich
Himmler, who held principal authority over the camps, sent a memo to
all camp commandants stating that inmate deaths must be reduced 'at
all costs' -- hardly something one would expect to find in a 'death
camp'. And while it was alleged at the trials that 4 million Jews were
'gassed' at Auschwitz, the German camp records were not admitted into
evidence, and would probably have vindicated many of the defendants if
they had been. In particular, the Auschwitz death books, which were
released by the Russian government about a decade ago, show that only
about 74,000 people died at Auschwitz in all the years of its
operation, most from typhus, with only about 30,000 of them being
Jews. Furthermore, the crematoria were intended not for the 'killing
of Jews', but rather for the sanitary disposal of the bodies of those
who died from typhus.
* While there were Allied spies in most camps reporting on camp
conditions by radio, none of these spies ever made a report about mass
killings or 'gas chambers'. The idea of 'gas chambers' evidently arose
from the fact that all the clothes of arriving inmates were
disinfected in a kind of gas chamber in which Zyklon B was used to
kill lice which were feared as disease vectors (Lousy Jews?). These
delousing chambers, it should be noted, were far too small for killing
people, particularly in the numbers posited by the OJV. It should also
be noted that Zyklon B, the form of cyanide supposedly used to kill
Jews, was in fact a special form of slow- release cyanide which was
appropriate for de-lousing clothing, but inappropriate for the
instantaneous killing that was supposedly done in the "gas chambers".
(The irony of Germans being accused of killing Jews by an instrument
which they (Germans) used for preserving Jewish lives should not go
unnoticed.) In addition, as revisionists have noted, such killings
would have been impossible on the scale claimed by the OJV because
cyanide is so dangerous that the bodies would have had to lie for
hours before they could be safely removed, even by those wearing
protective clothing and gas masks. Beyond this, cyanide gas is
explosive, so that any little spark, as from the friction of shoes on
the floor, or any flame, as from a cigaret, would have caused any 'gas
chamber' to be transported to the place where it was supposedly
sending Jews.
* Revisionists have proved that the rooms alleged to be 'gas chambers'
could not possibly have served this purpose. The first investigation
of this problem was done not for the Nuremberg trials, but rather many
years later by Fred Leuchter, an American engineer and execution
expert, who took samples from the walls of supposed 'gas chambers' at
several camps and found that there was essentially no cyanide residue
-- an impossibility if the rooms had been used as alleged. (Altho
Leuchter's work was flawed, his conclusions have been confirmed
independently by two other experts, Walter Luftl and Germar Rudolf.)
Other problems posed for the OJV by the alleged 'gas chambers' involve
such things as no air circulatory system for dispersing or ventilating
the gas, no means for heating the Zyklon B discs for proper dispersal,
the fact that the doors of the 'gas chambers' opened from the INSIDE,
and that Allied aerial photographs of Auschwitz during the war showed
no holes in the roof of the supposed 'gas chambers' which would have
allowed the introduction of Zyklon B -- a point made by Holocaust
revisionists in their oft-repeated challenge, "No holes; no
Holocaust!"
* There is no good evidence that nazi references to the 'final
solution to the Jewish question' referred to anything other than
removal of Jews from the area of the Third Reich, the (false)
allegations about the Wansee Conference notwithstanding. In
particular, no 'Hitler order' (or order from anyone else) has ever
been discovered, in spite of the known German propensity for extensive
record-keeping, altho there is an internal memo of a phone
conversation with Hitler signed by Hans Lemmerer of the Ministry of
the Interior showing that Hitler wanted the solution of the Jewish
problem SHELVED until the end of the war. Beyond this, the nazis
actually cooperated with the Zionists under the so-called Transfer
Agreement ("Ha'avara") to train Jews for settlement in Palestine, and
the training camps for Zionists were the only places in nazi Germany
in which the flag of the Zionist state was allowed to fly.
* Jewish population numbers published in standard reference works both
before and after the war do not show a decrease of Jewish numbers, but
rather an INCREASE. These reference works also demonstrate that THERE
WERE NOT EVEN SIX MILLION JEWS IN NAZI-OCCUPIED EUROPE
DURING THE PERIOD.
* The 'six million' is a mystical number derived from Jewish
scripture, and in particular is the number of Jews who are said to be
required to die before Israel can be re-established. This accounts for
why "New York governor Martin Glynn, in a major Albany speech in
October 1919 [that's TWENTY YEARS BEFORE THE START OF
WORLD WAR TWO, for all you who are a tad weak on dates], reported at
length on the 'holocaust [of] six million Jewish men and women' who
were dying due to the 'awful tyranny of war and a bigoted lust for
Jewish blood' during the 'Great War'" (Irena Zdiarska, "Holocaust Is
Undeniable -- But Should Be Debated", Barnes Review Oct 94: 27)). It
also accounts for the fact that, in spite of the formal reduction from
4 to 1.1 million of the number of Jews claimed to have been killed at
Auschwitz (see pix of Auschwitz plaques below), the 'six million'
number has never changed, and thus that in the Orwellian Kabbalistic
mathematics on which it is based, six minus three still equals six.
* The OJV has changed significantly over the years. We have already
mentioned that the 'soap' and 'lampshade' allegations are now rejected
by even establishment historians, altho this does not keep Jews from
continuing to hold burial ceremonies for newly-discovered bars of old
Reich soap (we don't know whether they have also done the same for
lampshades.) Another feature of the original OJV that has now changed
was the allegation that Jews were exterminated at the camps in Germany
as well as Poland -- an allegation which has been abandoned for some
time. Yet another abandoned allegation is that mass killings were
carried out by means of steam, electricity, gas vans (using the
exhaust), and burning in pits; and in fact, the Holocaust received its
name from the latter allegation -- yet another irony of this congeries
of lies.
* The one thing which has done most to convince people that the
allegations of German atrocities are true is the film clips we have
all seen of the liberation of the concentration camps, in which bodies
are shown piled high, and surviving inmates are seen to be little more
than walking skeletons. But in fact these admittedly-shocking films do
not make a case for German atrocities, and in fact actually refute the
notion of "gas chambers": If Germans were gassing Jews by the
millions, as the OJV alleges, then Jews simply would not be around
long enuf to starve, as the "walking skeletons" and emaciated bodies
of the dead obviously were doing. The starvation, it should be noted,
was simply a reflection of the fact that, toward the end of the war,
the German supply lines had broken down, and food was not getting to
the camps. And above all, one should not think that there is anything
unique to Germany about "walking skeletons" in "concentration camps":
Exactly the same thing happened at the Andersonville prison during the
American Civil War, and the nearby photo is a picture of one of those
inmates.
* If there is any one thing which is a clinching argument to the
matter of the OJV, it is the fact that it is illegal to openly express
doubt about this story in most countries of the Western world,
including Germany (of course!), Israel (of course!), Austria (of
course!), Spain, France, Australia, and Canada; and in those few
countries in which it is not illegal, the laws forbidding 'race hate'
are increasingly being interpreted as forbidding such expression. The
point here is that fact does not require the support of legislation --
only falsehood does. And of course it does not take a rocket scientist
to figure who is behind this illegalization; nor does it take a rocket
scientist to figure why cases of 'Holocaust denial' are so vigorously
prosecuted: Jews, and particularly Israel, have profited in numerous
ways and by billions of dollars in playing this scam, including an
unending number of Holocaust movies (more than 400 at last count,
according to scholar Michael Hoffman), Holocaust museums (popping up
everywhere), Holocaust books (Elie 'The Weasel' Wiesel has written
more than 30; The Diary of Anne Frank is a perennial best- seller,
etc, etc, etc), TV dramas (the airing of "Holocaust' in 1970 is when
the scam really took off), 'survivors' by the millions -- all
pensioned by the German government, shakedowns of companies which
supposedly profited from 'slave labor' or were otherwise tinged by
Third- Reich-related activities (eg, IBM, Swiss banks), and of course
the billions in 'reparations', 'foreign aid' and other 'guilt money'
showered on Israel by Germany and the US. It has gotten so bad that
Jewish Professor Norman Finkelstein calls it "The Holocaust Industry"
in
his book by the same name, where he quotes his mother as asking, "If
Hitler killed so many Jews, then where did all the 'survivors' come
from?" No need to explain, then, why there is a saying among Jews that
"There's no business like Shoah (Holocaust) business."
* The only facts that come within even a country mile of supporting
the contention of nazi extermination of Jews are reports of the
shootings on the Eastern front of communist partisans, many of whom
were Jews. The following is what Lawrence Nevers has had to say on the
subject:
continued"
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Jews/Jews-HoloRev.html
Michael Ejercito
Jan 2, 2012, 12:38:39 PM1/2/12
to
family.
The day the Nazis came for my father's family
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
April 7, 1994
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/864/the-day-the-nazis-came-for-my-fathers-family
FIFTY YEARS AGO this week, the Nazis came for my father's family.
The Jakubovics -- there were seven of them in the house -- were
awakened before dawn when the SS pounded on their window. Like the
other Jews in Legina, a village on the Czechoslovak-Hungarian border,
they were ordered to gather their belongings and prepare to leave at
once.
Thirty minutes later they were put on horse-drawn wagons and carted
out of Legina. In the nearest large Hungarian town, a place called
Satoraljaujhely, Jews from all over the region were being herded into
a ghetto. The walls were still going up around it as the Jakubovic
family arrived.
It was the day after Passover, the ancient Jewish festival celebrating
freedom and redemption.
For several weeks the ghetto grew increasingly crowded as more and
more Jews were brought in. Then it began to empty, as Jews were taken
out.
About 3,000 at a time, they were marched to the train station. The
waiting boxcars were filled with families. The doors were chained and
locked. There were no seats inside, no windows, no water. The only
toilet was a bucket on the floor.
For three days, the train moved -- three days of suffocation, thirst,
and filth. When it stopped, David and Leah Jakubovic and their five
youngest children, ages 21 to 8 -- Franceska, Markus, Zoltan, Yrvin,
and Alice -- were in Auschwitz.
* * *
A few years ago, I decided to chart a family tree.
I unrolled a great length of blank wrapping paper and began with my
father's four grandparents, the Weisses and the Jakubovics, writing
their names in the center. Those two couples had a total of 12
children, most of them born between 1880 and 1910. I was able to track
down the names of 11 -- two of them being David Jakubovic and Leah
Weiss, who married each other -- and inscribed them on the sheet.
I learned the names of spouses and filled them in. Then the names of
their children, and their children's spouses, and their children. I
traced the genealogy as best as I could through five generations,
handwriting names and dates on my big piece of wrapping paper.
It was more paper than I needed. This family tree has stumps where
branches ought to be. It gets narrower, not wider, as it grows. One
line after another stops abruptly, and all with a similar date
notation.
Alexander Weiss, wife Kati, son Tomasz -- d. 1942.
Regina Jakubovic, husband Herschel, five daughters -- d. 1944.
Gizella Weiss, husband surnamed Kraus -- d. 1944.
Freida Weiss, sons Robert, Laszlo, Mihaly -- d. 1944.
Leopold Weiss, wife Yolana, four children -- d. 1942.
I have no faces to put to these names, no stories to tell about them,
no remarks to attribute to them, no heirlooms to connect to them. All
I know is that they were my father's aunts, uncles, and cousins, and
like two out of every three Jews alive in Europe in 1938, they were
dead before 1946.
If I lose my piece of paper, there will be nothing to prove they ever
existed.
* * *
This is how my father, who with rare exceptions speaks about the
Holocaust only when he is asked, remembers his first day in Auschwitz:
"We arrived in Birkenau" -- part of the Auschwitz complex -- "on
Sunday morning. It was still dark, so it must have been before 5
o'clock. All of a sudden the train stops. The doors open. People
started shouting and dogs were barking. There were guards yelling
'Raus! Raus!' " -- 'Out! Out!'
"I remember going up the platform. We had to line up, men and women
separately, and go in front of Mengele. He had a little crop in his
hands and was waving, left, right, left, right. There were two or
three other guys, and they were pushing you, whichever way he pointed
with his crop.
"So my parents had to go to the right. Also my youngest brother and
sister; they were not much more than babies, small children. What it
meant -- left, right -- I didn't know. You just went where you were
pushed.
"I went in the other direction. I tried to stay together with my
brother Zoli. We had to get undressed, and they gave us the uniforms,
and tattooed us. And that was it. But within a few hours Zoli and I
were separated, and that was the last I ever heard of him.
"I guess they killed off my family that day, but I didn't know it
until later."
* * *
On his first day in the camp, Markus Jakubovic lost his parents and
four siblings. He would survive three more concentration camps before
liberation in May 1945. By the end he was disease-ridden, emaciated
from starvation, and close to death. He still remembers the crematoria
chimneys belching smoke day and night and the pits filled with
corpses.
He endured a forced march from Poland into Austria, when the Nazis
shot on the spot anyone who faltered or paused to rest. He saw Jews
hanged when they were caught trying to escape, their bodies left to
twist on the rope all day. He used to grab and swallow insects when he
saw them on the ground, so intense was his hunger.
But my father is shy about telling his story.
"I feel I had it not so bad as some of the others who suffered in the
camps," he says. "I did not go through hell like the others did. You
hear about infamous Auschwitz, the horrible stories. I did not have
any horrible stories."
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
NEMO
Jan 2, 2012, 12:43:27 PM1/2/12
to
Dejnisimo, What holocaust?
benjie (with the so homo name) Cramer, what happened, a year ago you
got all drunked up & were singing:
"20, 000,000 Ukes playing ukuleles, ew-kə-leh-leh - gone up in
smoke!"
Were you finally released from the Drunk Tank - the Abo's must've
left
you walking bowlegged, fool!
benjie (with the so homo name) Cramer, what happened, a year ago you
got all drunked up & were singing:
"20, 000,000 Ukes playing ukuleles, ew-kə-leh-leh - gone up in
smoke!"
Were you finally released from the Drunk Tank - the Abo's must've
left
you walking bowlegged, fool!
Michael Ejercito
Jan 2, 2012, 12:36:51 PM1/2/12
to
On Jan 2, 1:27 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
Michael Ejercito
Jan 2, 2012, 12:39:07 PM1/2/12
to
On Jan 2, 1:14 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Nancy" <nw...@live.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a3bb20c6-c242-4f93...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 1, 6:43 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:24:35 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com>
> > wrote:
>
> "Nancy" <nw...@live.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a3bb20c6-c242-4f93...@f33g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 1, 6:43 am, The Revd <peel...@degenerate.Grik> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:24:35 -0800 (PST), Nancy <nw...@live.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >On Dec 31, 2:20 pm,Michael Ejercito<mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > >> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>
> > >~~~
> > >Nancy
>
> > >I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>
> > I certainly hope so. It's long overjew [sic].
>
> ~~~
>
> >Nancy
> >No, you really don't.....what is to come on the Jews.....will come on
> >the West and much of Europe.
>
> No it will not. The Jews are the ones pushing for another worldwide
> conflict. Just as they engineered two previous events.
What are these two previous events?
> > >>http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >> Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > >> The Signs Are There If Jews Only Open Their Eyes
>
> > >~~~
> > >Nancy
>
> > >I believe a slaughter of the Jewish people is coming.
>
> > I certainly hope so. It's long overjew [sic].
>
> ~~~
>
> >Nancy
> >No, you really don't.....what is to come on the Jews.....will come on
> >the West and much of Europe.
>
> No it will not. The Jews are the ones pushing for another worldwide
> conflict. Just as they engineered two previous events.
Michael
Dejnisimo
Jan 3, 2012, 6:51:08 AM1/3/12
to
news:6c48ee5a-f94b-4948...@n39g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
You did not respond appropriately. You posted Jew lies.
On Jan 2, 1:27 am, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
.)
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:bc300094-91dc-49f4...@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 31 2011, 8:51 pm, "Dejnisimo" <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:3d40654e-5363-4ff7...@t13g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...http://www.israpundit.com/archives/42504
>
> > >Is Another Holocaust Coming?
>
> > There was never a former.
> > Yes, there was, and the following article explains how it happened.
>
> Nothing in that dishonest garbage makes any mention of the Jews declaring
> war on Germany.
>
> Jews are not honorable people. Read "The Host and The Parasite: How
> Israel's Fifth Column Consumed America." by Greg Felton.
>
> If you can manage that try "The Wandering Who" by Gilad Atzmon.
>
> Then "The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish
> Suffering." by Norman Finkelstein
>
> Then "The Invention of the Jewish People" by Shlomo Sand
>
> Then "The Synagogue of Satan" by Andrew Carrington
>
> Then "The Talmud Unmasked - The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concernings
> Christians" by I.B. Pranaitis
>
> If you can manage all that, come back in a year and tell me then what you
> think of supporting these people.
You did not respond appropriately. You posted Jew lies.
Anonymous
Jan 3, 2012, 6:59:50 AM1/3/12
to
news:2e76a031-cb79-4428...@v13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
You have posted the same Jew lies forty times in the past few days.
What is wrong with you? Apart from your being quite insane.
What is wrong with you? Apart from your being quite insane.
TallHenry
Jan 3, 2012, 2:26:01 PM1/3/12
to
In article <4f02eac1$0$30301$a826...@newsreader.readnews.com>,
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Suck on this, aussie filth:
Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
Suck on this, aussie filth:
dsharavi
Jan 3, 2012, 2:40:44 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 3, 11:26 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
> Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> [...]
>
> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>
> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
> hacked website:
> http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
So, where's Benzona on the list?
> Dejnisimo <djs...@incam.co.uk> wrote:
> [...]
>
> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>
> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
> hacked website:
> http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
********************************************************************************
DAVID IRVING'S EMAIL CONTACT DATABASE
********************************************************************************
adrian...@clara.co.uk">Adrian Davies
Alan Heath
Alan Heath
Alexander Craft
Andrew Moffat
Bartek Zborski
Costas Govostis
Erich Gliebe
Gabriela Marquez
Gabriela Marquez
Gerlinde Schmachtl"
"General"
Jaenelle Antas
Jaenelle Antas
Jessica Irving
John E Mayer
Jonathan Huddart "Rowe CPI"
Kari Sperstad
Lillehammer journalist
Kathy Hitchcock
Kevin Hall
Koridis Iolkos
Lady Renouf "Michele"
Lance Frickensmith
Lightning Source
LightningSource
Linda Hewett
Marcus Svensson
Philip Stopford
Print factory Hancock
Reka Antal
Roger Holtkamp
Sam Dickson
Steve Kerr
Veritas
Westbury Packaging
World War II books
Threermshds
tanvi...@hotmail.com
regen...@mindspring.com
NorEnriq
bobr...@comcast.net
oksa...@hotmail.com
steve_k...@yahoo.com
raffaele.p...@yahoo.it
and...@dinonet.it>
al.go...@shaw.ca>
filip.g...@tiscali.it
lynj...@hotmail.com
collin...@kolzone.net
profile...@yahoo-inc.com
fabio.r...@gmail.com
trojan...@expertran.com
"cmaide"
special...@bnp.org.uk
alexand...@netzero.com
BA.Cu...@email.ba.co
th...@hallandlewis.com
drod...@hotmail.com
"Eee333ecf"
srgr...@yahoo.com
rsus...@buckeye-express.com
alex7...@libero.it
rola...@sympatico.ca
rla...@columbus.rr.com
"FORDYCE10"
Cartwrig...@Yahoo.com
thomasca...@gmail.com
germar...@yahoo.com
dmt...@asyesk.com
georg...@yahoo.com
americ...@yahoo.com
dh...@comcast.net
john_...@yahoo.com.hk
raet...@hotmail.com
proo...@uspress.com
arkpi...@ironwillradio.com
ham...@res.hilton.com
delr...@msn.com
"DSmith7719"
tradition...@btinternet.com
lung...@msa.hinet.net
mickt...@hotmail.com
naumanj...@yahoo.com
wqz...@qohyyw.com
arjun...@yahoo.com
kirs...@sxu.edu
chr...@directcon.net
F.M...@aon.at
mvia...@live.co.uk
purgi...@comentis.com
steven...@hotmail.com
eorgef...@gmail.com
"cjw235"
tom.vande...@hotmail.com
angie...@hotmail.com
fba...@ist-e.org
dde...@online.no
in...@productpotential.co.uk
cmaitla...@yahoo.com
zapdadd...@gmail.com
reporter...@gmail.com
spr...@sprint.delivery.net
kgma...@yahoo.com
reg...@yahoo.co.uk
walker...@torontorehab.on.ca
hext...@hotmail.com
webd...@hotmail.com
v jgs...@hotmail.com
pyk...@yjhadw.com
v ped...@hotmail.com
lne...@crain.com
di...@yahoo.com
"Markus Henneke"
a...@Sparkey.biz
jhub...@hotmail.com
l...@may.org
p.zyc...@rzeczpospolita.pl
pri...@hotmail.com
dmob...@cox.net
MAILER...@pop4.gwtc.net
cynthia...@mail.com
ma...@libero.it
v paulhil...@msn.com
v johns...@yahoo.co.uk
reda...@up.lt
"rpzauner"
ubah_j...@msn.com
ajmo...@mercantile.wanadoo.co.uk
ihpled...@periszrz.zrz.tu-berlin.de
page...@ymail.com
Reuter...@reuters.com
Ltou...@zoptimization.net
david...@fsmail.net
fpe...@clisehotels.com
copybook...@yahoo.co.uk
al...@alexkurtagic.info
wilso...@gmail.com
fle...@primus.com.au
nord...@yahoo.com
quo...@optical.bms.com
lf...@comcast.net
rgra...@comcast.net
vwahrhe...@gmail.com
jimber...@embarqmail.com
karn...@embarqmail.com
Postm...@sympatico.ca
wac...@mail.com
ad7...@juno.com
burg...@btinternet.com
NW...@comcast.net
"Andtylem"
lainel...@yahoo.com
wooley...@hotmail.com
r_ma...@yahoo.com
glen...@yahoo.com
tsdo...@gmail.com
gl...@verizon.net
gert...@hotmail.com
"Nephelocentaur"
2ma...@cox.net
mark.l...@att.net
gjl...@yahoo.com
dwh...@earthlink.net
greg...@yahoo.co.uk
falc...@yahoo.com
"Cbe2869"
v ma...@iinet.net.au
"BO GARBUTT"
America...@welcome.aexp.com
"KSidd37398"
lani_...@sympatico.ca
Rosc...@optonline.net
bill...@yahoo.com
ay...@yandex.com
michael_...@yahoo.com
ferr...@sysmatrix.net
mark...@comcast.net
dcco...@gmail.com
prophe...@hotmail.com
mbad...@roadrunner.com
george....@umb.edu
msmab...@yahoo.com
v joseph...@hotmail.com
nga...@hotmail.com
duk...@verizon.net
wa...@me.com
sup...@cs.aplus.net
roxann...@hotmail.com
goul...@hotmail.com
mry...@bellsouth.net
mora...@tiscali.co.uk
jsha...@cincom.com
johns...@mchsi.com
JonN...@Yahoo.com
in...@fpp.co.uk
kenaug...@sympatico.ca
jdshe...@gmail.com
jtill...@msn.com
mshel...@virgilio.it
maveri...@hotmail.com
a.g....@ieee.org
ileana.ros- leht...@congressnewsletter.net
exwork...@gmail.com
garyg...@att.net
mlab...@reedexpo.com
johnok...@gmail.com
pewau...@yahoo.com
ija...@rezmsw.com
hockeyf...@yahoo.ca
web...@israelnationalnews.com
roll...@umn.edu
j...@latymer-upper.org
rjga...@hotmail.com
mlma...@att.net
mars...@earthlink.net
free...@frontiernet.net
mickey...@yahoo.com
do...@guardianforestkennels.com
wrigh...@gmx.com
sbs...@charter.net
jdwye...@sbcglobal.net
stein...@msn.com
"davidfri3"
dig...@hiwaay.net
adk...@hotmail.com
william...@att.net
chrisha...@hotmail.com
Crom...@att.net
hal.w...@gmail.com
upd...@theredpages.co.uk
SalU...@hotmail.com
ser...@youtube.com
bengdu...@yahoo.co.uk
james...@yahoo.com
stylist...@att.ne
v sowel...@yahoo.com
fland...@sbcglobal.net
srin...@hotmail.com
"GermanFilm"
lula_g...@yahoo.com
jjf...@att.net
ss7upa...@yahoo.com
"polopl7"
sbea...@gmail.com
in...@bodyartmag.cz
prescr...@pharmacy2u.co.uk
ser...@paypals.co.uk
ch...@wmsbrg.com
online...@card.com
gillesp...@shaw.ca
mw.s...@hotmail.com
Edmun...@ejwall.com.au
btbusin...@btcomms.com
fbi.sta...@live.com
mike.e...@antonyrowe.co.uk
owe...@msn.com
k-cath...@msn.com
slep...@shaw.ca
tgk...@hotmail.com
ser...@paypal.co.uk
celtic...@hotmail.co.uk
super_...@hotmail.com
bo...@andrew-norman.com
rickw...@hotmail.com
Besc...@ebbsfleet.freeserve.co.uk
mari...@hotmail.com
avisrese...@avis.com
mnel...@msn.com
jbo...@harbornet.com
tina.j...@msn.com
chris_p...@hotmail.com
eye...@shaw.ca
scott.c...@colsongroup.com
"TMcgu94263"
hce...@mxeccp.com
darow...@yahoo.com
mailer...@kundenserver.de
ku...@timberframecanada.com
"GHeidemannHH"
ser...@paypal.com
gmatth...@yahoo.com
dsta...@dsyrecovery.com
tarkat...@live.co.uk
prear...@h2.hilton.com
kkgu...@yahoo.co.uk
postm...@monsanto.com
sprin...@sprint.delivery.net
r_ed...@sky.com
"Kenkhill"
deby.m...@gmail.com
erica...@mchsi.com
trojan...@gmail.com
free_...@hotmail.com
idobr...@gmail.com
aseem...@sknl.co.in
infor...@refund.com.au
hof...@revisionisthistory.org
era...@online.no
UnknownSender@UnknownDomain
senate....@msn.com
jfcu...@hotmail.com
j.r....@gmail.com
jcprom...@thejc.com
camelbr...@yahoo.com
john...@live.com
stephenm...@alice.it
ken...@lyse.net
bil...@aplus.net
arnevi...@hotmail.com
julia...@hotmail.com
Off...@valuebigpromotions.com
claudi...@hotmail.com
bdowl...@hotmail.com
"DeltaCastle"
xuch...@163.com
ebett...@gmail.com
kari.tone...@gd.no
alheithinn...@gmail.com
jori...@hotmail.com
ukenq...@info.pitneybowes.co.uk
"focalp"
daire...@hotmail.com
joeha...@hotmail.co.uk
elseberitk...@hotmail.com
magnus...@hotmail.com
wuben33...@msn.com
wuben7...@msn.com
roge...@bellsouth.net
scott...@cantv.net
erik...@msn.com
arktos...@yahoo.co.uk
alizeta_ou...@voila.fr
rcd...@yahoo.co.uk
kellye...@sprynet.com
bartlomie...@bellona.pl
kris...@startsiden.no
paloma...@hotmail.com
"Sigma123ab"
csil...@hotmail.com
mw...@uspress.com
ladym...@jailingopinions.co
6l...@msn.com
jdl...@live.co.uk
tina_...@msn.com
or...@shaw.ca
bigal...@hotmail.com
tbish...@hotmail.com
ot...@privat.dk
tru192...@mailme.dk
jarosl...@yahoo.com
james...@webdesignpark.info
"Averbv55"
mimm...@yahoo.com
ehes...@umw.edu
ero...@pcu.net
ih...@choicehotels.com
fr...@fritzheede.com
vivai...@yahoo.com
ovca...@dilia.cz
dnl...@alice.it
gla...@msn.com
cfa...@sbcglobal.net
naval-...@ntlworld.com
hollywo...@yahoo.com
hms...@prodigy.net
mai...@borderlandspress.com
murra...@ca.rr.com
"RenoDeCaro"
cary...@live.com
pay...@service.com
michael...@yahoo.com
amyda...@sbcglobal.net
"moderev"
etbry...@yahoo.com
thedeb...@yahoo.com
ok...@q.com
mem...@paypal.com
astr...@yahoo.com
tims...@hotmail.com
jamesbp...@sbcglobal.net
bra...@brandonragle.com
mono_...@yahoo.com
mo...@monamontgomery.com
lonewlf...@yahoo.com
seppdie...@gmail.com
kbe...@hotmail.com
"grub222"
teve...@hotmail.com
arcand...@sympatico.ca
sml...@flash.net
murph...@yahoo.com
cc...@hotmail.com">
linda5...@yahoo.co.jp
joa...@gahm.com
leif.b...@transit.se
arspen...@verizon.net
d.von...@herbig.net
captain_...@yahoo.com
d5...@live.com
"EugeneThomas1"
Konstan...@aia.gr
stefan...@sbcglobal.net
elderdavi...@gmail.com
Steve...@experian.com
wv...@q.com
"PNeilKirstein"
fdm.u...@live.com
sirgreg...@embarqmail.com
Pet...@comcast.net
Pet...@comcast.net
ubr...@obgagq.com
ernst...@cox.net
Hers...@sesmail.com
dpjn...@hotmail.com
online...@alert.bankofamerica.com
rma...@yahoo.com
snow_...@yahoo.com
emailr...@authorize.net
tsf...@srvinet.com
john...@rogers.com
wilsonbri...@yahoo.com
rrl...@zortjj.com
jem...@lifeinsuranceglobal.com
hugo.hai...@virgin.net
gpo...@centurytel.net
res...@cs.bestwestern.com
johncla...@live.com
efe20...@yahoo.es "General"
jn...@hotmail.com
newbi...@yahoo.com
pressre...@gmail.com
"StoneWT"
andrew...@doglegs.com
mattfos...@yahoo.com
msmit...@yahoo.com
rig...@kohearn.wanadoo.co.uk
marlen...@live.co.uk
jper...@emporia.edu
Geoffre...@capetown.gov.za
Melba...@mantramail.com
pete...@yahoo.com
MAILER...@yahoo.com
sophi...@terra.es
ianofh...@hotmail.co.uk
mrsannro...@msn.com
gregor...@hotmail.com
will...@student.uwa.edu.au
msma...@earthlink.net
j.va...@prodigy.net
dave...@lycos.com
mikej...@bellnet.ca
freeepa...@gmail.com
jo...@telupton.com
rawi...@verizon.net
ad...@harryhughes.net
robert...@gmail.com
dr...@europeanamericansunited.org
kevinwa...@yahoo.co
newsl...@mundoportugues.org
blacktime...@gmail.com
we...@ihr.org
peter.as...@aon.at
genp...@gmail.com
aja...@hotmail.com
rjm...@rochester.rr.com
sales...@brandenburghistorica.com
dsharavi
Jan 3, 2012, 2:37:28 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 2, 9:11 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
slug. Like you.
[flush slug slime]
> On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 11:05:31 -0800 (PST), dsharavi wrote:
> >On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> >> by Mark Weber
>
> >Mark Weber is an antisemitic propagandist.
>
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
> being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
> "anti-German"?
Mark Weber isn't "anti-Arab" or "anti-Christian". He's an antisemitic
> >On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> >> by Mark Weber
>
> >Mark Weber is an antisemitic propagandist.
>
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
> being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
> "anti-German"?
slug. Like you.
[flush slug slime]
TallHenry
Jan 3, 2012, 2:49:44 PM1/3/12
to
In article <6fe42538-1cc8-4cdb...@l16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Well, perhaps even Irving has *some* standards :)
dsharavi <dsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 11:26 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
>> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>>
>> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
>> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
>> hacked website:
>> http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
> So, where's Benzona on the list?
>
> *************************************************************
> On Jan 3, 11:26 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
>> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>>
>> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
>> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
>> hacked website:
>> http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
> So, where's Benzona on the list?
>
> *************************************************************
> DAVID IRVING'S EMAIL CONTACT DATABASE
> **************************************************************
[...]
> **************************************************************
Well, perhaps even Irving has *some* standards :)
dsharavi
Jan 3, 2012, 3:31:46 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 3, 11:49 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
> In article <6fe42538-1cc8-4cdb-ab36-dfdc77102...@l16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
even for Duke.
> In article <6fe42538-1cc8-4cdb-ab36-dfdc77102...@l16g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 11:26 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
> >> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>
> >> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
> >> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
> >> hacked website:
> >>http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
> > So, where's Benzona on the list?
>
> > *************************************************************
> > DAVID IRVING'S EMAIL CONTACT DATABASE
> > **************************************************************
>
> [...]
>
> Well, perhaps even Irving has *some* standards :)
Hard to believe, but maybe a filthy-minded pedophile is a bit much,
> dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Jan 3, 11:26 am, TallHenry <n...@home.org> wrote:
> >> Suck on this, aussie filth:
>
> >> Here are names, addresses, e-mails and more details of
> >> American "revisionists", taken directly from David Irving's
> >> hacked website:
> >>http://jewishdefense.org/irvinghack.htm
> > So, where's Benzona on the list?
>
> > *************************************************************
> > DAVID IRVING'S EMAIL CONTACT DATABASE
> > **************************************************************
>
> [...]
>
> Well, perhaps even Irving has *some* standards :)
even for Duke.
Topaz
Jan 3, 2012, 7:57:21 PM1/3/12
to
In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide
variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of
Jews (and they include a surprising number of Jewish commentators,
mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by
today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature. There is
a large body of such material extending throughout history, written by
critics wherever Jews were to be found. Observations about Jewish
life by non-Jews is startlingly consistent over two thousand years.
Consistently credible Gentile themes in attacks against Jews include
Jewish elitism, their insularity and clannishness, their disdain for
non-Jews, their exploitive and deceptive behavior towards those not
their own, the suspicion of Jewish national loyalties and allegiance
to the lands they lived in, excessive Jewish proclivity for money and
economic domination, and an economic "parasitism" (the concentration
of Jews in lucrative non-productive fields of finance-usury, money
lending, etc.-at the expense of non-Jewish communities).
"Hatred for the Jews," Abram Leon writes, "does not date solely from
the birth of Christianity. Seneca treated the Jews as a criminal race.
Juvenal believed that the Jews only existed to cause evil for other
peoples. Quintilian said that Jews were a curse for other people"
(Leon, 71).
In 59 BC the Roman statesman Cicero criticized Jewish "clannishness"
and "influence in the assemblies." In the second century AD Celsus,
one of Rome's great medical writers, wrote that Jews "pride themselves
in possessing superior wisdom and disdain for the company of other
men." Philostratus, an ancient Greek author, believed that Jews "have
long since risen against humanity itself. They are men who have
devised a misanthropic life, who share neither food nor drink with
others." (Cf. Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, I, iii, 29-32.) The
great Roman historian Tacitus (A.D. 56-120) declared that "the Jews
are extremely loyal toward one another, and are always ready to show
compassion [for their fellow Jews], but toward other people they feel
only hate and enmity" (Morais, 46).
Centuries later Voltaire's criticism of Jews, in his Essai sur le
Moeurs, repeated many of the same charges: "The Jewish nation dares to
display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts
against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the
well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous-cringing in misfortune
and insolent in prosperity."
"However uncomfortable it is to recognize," says Albert Lindemann,
"not all those whom historians have classified as anti-Semites were
narrow bigots, irrational, or otherwise incapable of acts of altruism
and moral courage. They represented a bewildering range of opinion and
personality types" (Lindemann, 13). And why is this "uncomfortable
[for Jews] to recognize?" Because, by even a child's exercise of logic
and common sense, the common denominator of all such disparate people
can only be the enduring truths about Jews as each observer
experienced them in varying historical and cultural circumstances.
The French Jewish intellectual (and eventual Zionist), Bernard Lazare,
among many others in history, noted this obvious fact in 1894, long
before the Nazi persecutions of Jews and resultant institutionalized
Jewish efforts to deny, or obfuscate, crucial-and central- aspects of
their history:
Wherever the Jews settled one observes the development of
anti-Semitism, or rather anti-Judaism ... If this hostility, this
repugnance had been shown towards the Jews at one time or in one
country only, it would be easy to account for the local cause of this
sentiment. But this race has been the object of hatred with all
nations amidst whom it settled.
Inasmuch as the enemies of Jews belonged to diverse races, as
they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by
different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had
not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another,
so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it
must needs be that the general causes of anti-Semitism have always
resided in [the people of] Israel itself, and not in those who
antagonized it (Lazare, 8).
Excerpts from from When Victims Rule, online at Jewish Tribal Review.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm
Topaz
Jan 3, 2012, 7:58:10 PM1/3/12
to
The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder
'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.
Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
average man 'knows' the Holocaust exists because:
1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'
In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no
logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.
'Holocaust' is a loaded, dishonest term. You can't debate with
undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man
does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by
mass media, to disable his thinking so that he's worse positioned to
defend himself because he can't understand how he is manipulated to
accept the illogical. Debate in the mass media of a democracy is
nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms.
'Holocaust' is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at
the head of the West and the rest. Give them their money and their
pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will
notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to
deconstruct the Zionist Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the
designer label 'Holocaust.' Worship the Zionists and submit to their
demands - that is what the term Holocaust means.
A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history;
that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the
'Holocaust,' taking at face value the term's pretension to historical
designation, is the claim that six million Jews were murdered by Nazi
Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is
never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord
wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing
them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any
ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation
advanced. That Jews were gassed is treated as though it were already
proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the
practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to
smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all
know that Jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are
deniers driven by hate. But it ain't so just because "everybody knows"
it is.
We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.
There are men who can prove the 'Holocaust' is a Big Lie. You can find
them in jail. Their imprisonment is scarcely mentioned in the mass
media. Their imprisonment goes unlamented by the mass columnists. To
discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propa-sphere the
media construct. They must disappear. But we know, mass media. And
we're not going away. We're getting louder and stronger. And there's
nothing you can do to stop us.
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 3, 2012, 9:35:04 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 2, 7:47 am, "Anonymous" <anonym...@nul.com> wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
A more important question might be when will it end..
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 3, 2012, 9:31:54 PM1/3/12
to
On Dec 31 2011, 2:20 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Jews know that the most ancient of evils, Jew hatred that has taken an
> unimaginable toll on the Jewish people throughout the millennia, is
> extant today.
He needs to explain why. <crickets>
> They know that while intractable and unbridled Jew hatred, be it in
> its purest form or in the guise of Israel hatred, while coming mostly
> from the Muslim world, is also coming from parts of the Christian and
> other non-Muslim world.
>
> That millennial old Christian Jew hatred, in recent years has been
> resurgent as Steyn notes, especially in Europe where Jew hatred is
> finding increasing expression by word and deed, not just from ordinary
> citizens, but from European religious, institutional, media and
> political leaders.
They're probably tired of seeing people put in prison for asking about
those six million.
wrote:
>
> Jews know that the most ancient of evils, Jew hatred that has taken an
> unimaginable toll on the Jewish people throughout the millennia, is
> extant today.
He needs to explain why. <crickets>
> They know that while intractable and unbridled Jew hatred, be it in
> its purest form or in the guise of Israel hatred, while coming mostly
> from the Muslim world, is also coming from parts of the Christian and
> other non-Muslim world.
>
> That millennial old Christian Jew hatred, in recent years has been
> resurgent as Steyn notes, especially in Europe where Jew hatred is
> finding increasing expression by word and deed, not just from ordinary
> citizens, but from European religious, institutional, media and
> political leaders.
They're probably tired of seeing people put in prison for asking about
those six million.
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 3, 2012, 9:34:22 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 1, 2:36 pm, Michael Ejercito <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> > by Mark Weber
>
> How does a Holocaust happen?
>
> by Jeff Jacoby
> On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> > by Mark Weber
>
> How does a Holocaust happen?
>
> The Boston Herald
> March 30, 1992
>
> http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5710/how-does-a-holocaust-happen
>
> ONE DAY 16 OR 17 YEARS AGO, my father, who rarely blows up over
> anything, lost his temper over a piece of bread.
>
> It was lunchtime, and my siblings and I were goofing around at the
> table. One of us, in play, threw a slice of bread at another. My
> father exploded.
>
> "What's the matter with you? That's food! Don't you ever let me see
> you treat food like again!"
LOL!
>
> (Jeff Jacoby is the Boston Herald's chief editorial writer.)
We ain't surprised, Pedro.
dsharavi
Jan 3, 2012, 9:40:00 PM1/3/12
to
On Jan 3, 4:57 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide
> variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of
> Jews (and they include a surprising number of Jewish commentators,
> mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by
> today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature.
A small part of this rant is from Isacque Graeber and Steuart
> In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide
> variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of
> Jews (and they include a surprising number of Jewish commentators,
> mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by
> today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature.
Henderson, "Jews in a gentile world: the problem of anti-
Semitism" (Macmillan 1942). The hysterical part is pure White Power /
KKK
/ neo-Nazi / RadioIslam tripe.
>http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm
Jewish Tribal Review is an antisemitic hate site.
> http://www.ihr.org/
The "Institute for Historical[SIC] Review" - whose director is
antisemite Mark Weber, and which features such stellar "historicans"
as David Irving - has been designated a hate site and a Holocaust
denial group.
>http://www.natvan.com
The National Alliance -- "Toward a New Consciousness; A New Order; A
New People" -- ideology and news commentary from a White racial
perceptive. "News for White people from White people."
Links to Other Sites:
Resistance Records -- "The Soundtrack for White Revolution"
Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands -- The NPD is the
foremost nationalist organization in Germany.
Golden Dawn -- Greece's premier White nationalist organization.
Svenska Motstandsrorelsen -- Sweden's premier White nationalist
organization.
> http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
"National-Socialist Worldview -- Examining issues pertaining to the
origin, theory, history, and application of national-socialism and
national-socialist ideas."
It's doubtful that these White Supremacist/neo-Nazi sites are all that
fond of "palestinians".
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 3, 2012, 9:58:11 PM1/3/12
to
NEMO
Jan 3, 2012, 10:01:12 PM1/3/12
to
Well, they got the Nazi/muzzie -wog circle jerk going with Topaz &
last_permutation & with ol' benjie (with the so homo name) Cramer they
can have the goat fuck!
Whatta bunch of foooooooooooooking wankers!
last_permutation & with ol' benjie (with the so homo name) Cramer they
can have the goat fuck!
Whatta bunch of foooooooooooooking wankers!
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 4, 2012, 8:45:57 AM1/4/12
to
The original column written by the ZioNazi could contribute to
bringing on another Holocaust.
CUNTICA
Jan 4, 2012, 11:29:58 AM1/4/12
to
" The original column written by the ZioNazi could contribute to
bringing on another Holocaust."
You, last_permutation, don't make me laugh, you gutless wanker?
bringing on another Holocaust."
What do you do when you see a one legged raghead?
Laugh & reload!
Michael Ejercito
Jan 4, 2012, 1:05:04 PM1/4/12
to
On Jan 3, 6:34 pm, last_permutat...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > (Jeff Jacoby is the Boston Herald's chief editorial writer.)
>
> We ain't surprised, Pedro.
Of course you would not be surprised; he is more suitable for the
position than you.
Michael
> On Jan 1, 2:36 pm,Michael Ejercito<mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> > > by Mark Weber
>
> > How does a Holocaust happen?
>
> > by Jeff Jacoby
> > The Boston Herald
> > March 30, 1992
>
> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5710/how-does-a-holocaust-happen
>
> > ONE DAY 16 OR 17 YEARS AGO, my father, who rarely blows up over
> > anything, lost his temper over a piece of bread.
>
> > It was lunchtime, and my siblings and I were goofing around at the
> > table. One of us, in play, threw a slice of bread at another. My
> > father exploded.
>
> > "What's the matter with you? That's food! Don't you ever let me see
> > you treat food like again!"
>
> LOL!
Read the rest of the article.
>
>
>
> > On Jan 1, 10:14 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Auschwitz: Myths and facts
> > > by Mark Weber
>
> > How does a Holocaust happen?
>
> > by Jeff Jacoby
> > The Boston Herald
> > March 30, 1992
>
> >http://www.jeffjacoby.com/5710/how-does-a-holocaust-happen
>
> > ONE DAY 16 OR 17 YEARS AGO, my father, who rarely blows up over
> > anything, lost his temper over a piece of bread.
>
> > It was lunchtime, and my siblings and I were goofing around at the
> > table. One of us, in play, threw a slice of bread at another. My
> > father exploded.
>
> > "What's the matter with you? That's food! Don't you ever let me see
> > you treat food like again!"
>
> LOL!
>
>
>
> > (Jeff Jacoby is the Boston Herald's chief editorial writer.)
>
> We ain't surprised, Pedro.
position than you.
Michael
last_per...@yahoo.com
Jan 4, 2012, 1:44:55 PM1/4/12
to
Topaz
Jan 4, 2012, 7:44:52 PM1/4/12
to
Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
NEMO
Jan 4, 2012, 8:37:29 PM1/4/12
to
So, dipshit, asswipe Topaz the Faggot, do you stll beat off to the
photo's of the dead Goebbels children, you sexually frustrated Nazi
eunuch?
photo's of the dead Goebbels children, you sexually frustrated Nazi
eunuch?
Michael Ejercito
Jan 4, 2012, 9:34:48 PM1/4/12
to
The following article is about seeking justice for the crimes of
the past.
Seeking justice for crimes of the past
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/3042/seeking-justice-for-crimes-of-the-past
LAST WEDNESDAY, exactly one year from the day that John (Ivan)
Demjanjuk was released from an Israeli prison and allowed to return to
the United States, the Justice Department moved to revoke the
citizenship of Aleksandras Lileikis, an elderly Lithuanian immigrant
who lives in Norwood, Mass. Perhaps the timing was a hint that the
government will not let the outcome of the Demjanjuk case -- in which
an indisputably guilty war criminal was set free on a technicality --
derail its efforts to root out Nazi collaborators living in America.
Like Demjanjuk, a Ukrainian, Lileikis is charged with having been one
of the legion of East Europeans who willingly joined the Nazis in
effecting the Final Solution, then immigrated to the United States
under fraudulent pretenses. Unlike Demjanjuk, an ignorant peasant
trained by the Nazis to kill Jews at the Sobibor and Treblinka death
camps, Lileikis was an officer and an intellectual, with power and
prestige and scores of men at his command. The Demjanjuk prosecution
turned on the testimony of aging eyewitnesses and evidence supplied by
the KGB, but the case against the Lithuanian rests on a solid paper
trail, with every damning document is signed by Lileikis himself.
A university graduate who earned a law degree and speaks several
languages, Lileikis made his mark in the Lithuanian secret police --
the "Saugumas." By 1939, he was chief of the Saugumas in Vilna,
Lithuania's largest city. When the Soviet Union occupied the Baltic
States in 1940, Lileikis ran away to Nazi Germany. He returned to his
homeland after Germany invaded Lithuania in June of 1941, and was
reinstalled by the Nazis in his former position.
The Saugumas was a major component of the Nazi killing operation in
Lithuania, which began immediately following the invasion. The Germans
relied on Lileikis and his officers to round up Jews and transport
them to the Ponary Woods, a forest about six miles outside Vilna.
There, they were stripped, robbed of their belongings, lined up 10 or
20 at a time at the edge of deep pits, and shot.
Jewish victims of mass murder in the Ponary Woods near Vilna,
Lithuania
The killing was done by death squads called "Einsatzgruppen." The term
is German. But the killers at the Ponary pits were largely Lithuanian.
For Lithuanians had welcomed the Nazi invasion, greeting the Germans
with flowers and cheers. Many Lithuanians (like many Poles, Latvians,
and Ukrainians) were anti-Semitic to the core, only too glad to
participate in killing their Jewish neighbors. With the collaboration
of the Saugumas and the Lithuanians who volunteered to commit mass
murder at places like Ponary, the Nazis, in just three years, were
able to exterminate 96 percent of Lithuanian Jewry.
Before the war, Vilna was a vibrant center of Jewish learning,
culture, and literature, so renowned that it was nicknamed "the
Jerusalem of Lithuania." Some 80,000 Jews lived in Vilna when the
Nazis entered. By the time they departed, the Jerusalem of Lithuania
was virtually Jew-free.
History books and Nazi records are replete with statistics: 5,000
Vilna Jews massacred at Ponary in the first 12 days of the German
occupation; 35,000 in the first two months; 48,000 by the end of 1941.
Dr. Jacob Wigodsky was one of these statistics. A former member of the
Polish Senate, a longtime leader of Vilna's Jewish community, he was
arrested by the Saugumas, presumably at Lileikis' command, and shot at
Ponary on Aug. 31, 1941. He was 86 years old, killed for the crime of
being a Jew. Lileikis is 87.
Abba Kovner, a Vilna resident who survived the war, described two more
of these statistics at the Eichmann trial in 1961:
"At midnight, I saw from the other side of the street, it was 39
Ostrashun Street, a woman was dragged by the hair by two soldiers -- a
woman who was holding something in her arms. One of them directed a
beam of light into her face; the other one dragged her by her hair and
threw her on the pavement.
"Then the infant fell out of her arms. One of the two, the one with
the flashlight, I believe, took the infant, raised him into the air,
grabbed him by the leg. The woman crawled on the earth, took hold of
his boot, and pleaded for mercy. But the soldier took the boy and hit
him with his head against the wall -- once, twice, smashed him against
the wall."
On Aug. 31, 1941, alone, according to the Nazis' meticulous
bookkeeping, precisely 2,019 Jewish women, 864 men, and 817 children
were shot at Ponary.
It is difficult, 50 years on, to see faces or recall names in these
statistics. Far easier to see Lileikis' face -- to see the extremely
old man he has become, with little left in this world but his thick
glasses, his ailing wife, and his dilapidated house on Sumner Street.
Why pursue him? Why dig up papers he signed long ago -- citing musty
statistics, disturbing his peace - when the end of his life is so
near?
Why? Because a man remains accountable for his life even at the end of
his life. Because civilization depends on reinforcing the idea of
justice, even when justice itself can no longer be meted out. Because
only by keeping open the window of memory can we protect ourselves
against the hells of our past.
If the Justice Department is correct, the man who helped turn
thousands of men, women, and children into statistics entered the
United States in 1955 and became an American citizen in 1976. The
crimes he abetted in Vilna cannot be undone. But his presence in this
country is one abomination that can still be reversed.
dsharavi
Jan 4, 2012, 10:32:36 PM1/4/12
to
On Jan 4, 4:44 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime.
According to.....
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime.
> http://www.ihr.org/
An antisemitic site.
>http://www.natvan.com
>
A White Power site.
> http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
A neo-Nazi site.
NEMO
Jan 5, 2012, 12:07:52 AM1/5/12
to
dsharavi, I don't know why you debate these Nazi scum/muzzie - wog
bastards, their Jew - baiting ignorance is inbred.
Look at that degenerate Caroloooooooooney Reb, do you think you'll get
anything bordering on intelligence out of that pinhead, inbred, KKK
hillbilly?
They only understand violence - well, give it to them, in Spades &
Aces!
bastards, their Jew - baiting ignorance is inbred.
Look at that degenerate Caroloooooooooney Reb, do you think you'll get
anything bordering on intelligence out of that pinhead, inbred, KKK
hillbilly?
They only understand violence - well, give it to them, in Spades &
Aces!
P-Dub
Jan 5, 2012, 7:27:42 PM1/5/12
to
On 1/4/2012 7:44 PM, Topaz wrote:
>
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
> being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
> "anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
> they are special.
blah blah blah.
>
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
> being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
> "anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
> they are special.
You are a broken record of lies lies lies. You think you are special,
but you are a complete loser shithead.
FOAD you turd.
Topaz
Jan 5, 2012, 8:29:17 PM1/5/12
to
by James Buchanan
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org
Let's say the Germans merely removed the Jews from positions of
political power and banned them from the legal profession. Germany
went from devastating economic poverty in 1932 to full employment just
a couple years later. If an incredible economic improvement can be
achieved, merely by removing the Jews from power (and replacing them
with patriotic nationalists), then every Gentile nation in the world
should give this a try.
Obviously the Jews don't want anyone else getting the idea of removing
them to create prosperity. The Jews control the mass media in most
Western countries. Most people don't know about the Balfour
Declaration. During World War One, Zionist Jews offered to use their
control of the press to bring America into World War One if Britain
would promise them Palestine. This offer was dubbed the Balfour
Declaration. If the Jews had enough media control and influence to
push America into World War One in 1917, what else have they done with
their power?
It was a huge embarrassment for the Jews to see Germany so prosperous
in the mid-1930s after removing them from power. They considered this
a dangerous precedent. To deal with this "problem" the Jewish World
Congress declared war on Germany in 1933. This declaration of war at
least encouraged a world-wide boycott against Germany and at worst
encouraged other nations of the world to become hostile toward
Germany. (The Jews curiously sanctioned the Germans before the Germans
passed any laws restricting the Jews.) More importantly the Jews
pushed vicious anti-German slander in all the Jewish-owned newspapers
in the West in the years leading up to World War Two. The Communist
mass murder of 30 million people in Russia and the Ukraine received
almost no publicity in the Jewish media. Most people in the West only
heard a serious mention of these Communist mass murders beginning in
the 1980s. Instead, the Jewish media focused all their hatred and
agitation against Germany and its allies.
After six years of relentless agitation, the Jews pushed England and
France into war with Germany. Only two years later, FDR and his cabal
of Jews provoked a war with Japan (and Germany).
Naturally, the Jews did not want future historians to say: "World War
Two was provoked by the Jewish media in retaliation for Germany
removing the Jews from power." The Jews needed a new reason for World
War Two. A reason that painted their enemies as unquestionably evil.
So they invented the Holocaust.
The Holocaust stood mostly unchallenged for decades after the war
because people feared being branded "Nazi-sympathizers" for
questioning its details. The truth always comes out in the long run.
Professor Arthur Butz published his famous work "The Hoax of the 20th
Century" in 1977 detailing a very solid argument against this war
propaganda. Dr. Butz pointed out that the world population of Jews
remained at about 16 million before and after the war. He also noted
that half a million Jews remained in Paris after four years of German
occupation. Both these facts strongly suggest the Holocaust is a
fraud, but the political power of the Jews has suppressed and punished
any public questioning of the Holocaust to this day. David Irving
joined the ranks of Revisionist historians several years ago and went
from a famous successful author to a pariah thanks to persecution by
the Jews.
The Institute for Historical Review has done great work exposing the
Holocaust as a great historical fraud. Anyone interested in looking
for historical truth should visit their website. It's a shock for many
people to see how much propaganda we've been force fed.
http://www.ihr.org
Topaz
Jan 5, 2012, 8:27:30 PM1/5/12
to
By Jim Taylor
I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
salaries, paychecks and various earnings. No other nation on this
earth is dumb enough to do that not even the African ones. And to make
it worse you people do it gladly and with joy in your hearts. No one
complains, except me. Everyone else seems to think it is all right for
every American citizen to be robbed in this manner every day of their
lives with no end in sight. Can any nation be dumber that this? Most
Americans are so enslaved via Zionist propaganda and government
pronouncements that they think we owe this money so the Israelis can
live a much better life than in the good old USA. They have luxuries
you cannot afford. They take vacations all over the world which
Americans on average cannot afford. And when they do this they always
America and criticize you people who are the very ones who provide
them with these opportunities. I say you cannot get dumber than that.
The Israelis buy expensive things with YOUR money and then make fun of
you for being this dumb.
The worst part about this involuntary servitude is that the cruel
and criminal Israelis use YOUR money for arms to murder Arabs on a
daily basis, and sometimes they also kill Americans with your money.
So every American taxpayer is guilty of murder because under the law
anyone who pays someone to commit murder is equally guilty.
Topaz
Jan 5, 2012, 8:28:30 PM1/5/12
to
It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
Mein Kampf:
"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.
"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.
"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.
"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.
"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."
" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.
"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I had formerly looked at in a different light."
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
dsharavi
Jan 5, 2012, 10:00:51 PM1/5/12
to
On Jan 5, 5:27 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> By Jim Taylor
> I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
> dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
> Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
> salaries, paychecks and various earnings.
Not as dumb as anyone who believes this crap -- and from a poster who
> By Jim Taylor
> I believe I can, in one fell swoop prove that we have the
> dumbest country on earth. All I need to do is mention that since 1948,
> Americans have given Israel over 15 million dollars a day from your
> salaries, paychecks and various earnings.
relies exclusively upon White Power / KKK / neo-Nazi hate sites.
> http://www.ihr.org/
According the the Southern Poverty Law Center:
Institute for Historical Review
Founded in 1978 by Willis Carto, a longtime anti-Semite, the
Institute for Historical Review (IHR) is a pseudo-academic
organization that claims to seek "truth and accuracy in history," but
whose real purpose is to promote Holocaust denial and defend Nazism.
>http://www.natvan.com
National Vanguard
Formed in 2005 by longtime activist Kevin Strom, National Vanguard
was a breakaway group from the neo-Nazi National Alliance. National
Vanguard was increasing its membership before the arrest and
imprisonment of its leader, Kevin Strom, in 2007 for child pornography
and witness tampering, after which the group fell apart.
> http://national-socialist-worldview.blogspot.com
National Socialist Movement
Founded: 1994
Location: Detroit, Mich.
Profiled Leadership: Jeff Schoep
Ideology: Neo-Nazi
An organization that specializes in theatrical and provocative
protests, the National Socialist Movement (NSM) is one of the largest
and most prominent neo-Nazi groups in the United States. The group is
notable for its violent anti-Jewish rhetoric, its racist views and its
policy allowing members of other racist groups to join NSM while
remaining members of other groups. Until 2007, NSM members protested
in full Nazi uniforms, now traded in for black “Battle Dress
Uniforms.”
In Their Own Words
“All non-White immigration must be prevented. We demand that all non-
Whites currently residing in America be required to leave the nation
forthwith and return to their land of origin: peacefully or by force.”
— “25 Points of American National Socialism,” NSM website
“When … you take a German Shepherd and mix him with a Golden Retriever
you have a worthless animal that nobody wants and that isn’t worth
anything if you’re trying to breed him or sell him. … [T]hese
degenerates that allow their children to race mix and this sort of
thing, they’re destroying the bloodlines of both races.”
— NSM leader Jeff Schoep, July 25, 2007, interview
“I do not see the niggers, homosexuals, mexicans, jews, or even child
molesters ashamed or afraid to speak their minds and rally, march,
post, and be activists for their sick cause. And too many brave men
and women died to give me the chance to fight now. I will honor their
blood and fight for soil.”
— Prominent NSM member J.T. Ready, in a June 15, 2008, blog post
Background
The National Socialist Movement has its roots in the original American
Nazi Party, which was founded in 1959 by former Navy Cmdr. George
Lincoln Rockwell. Seven years after Rockwell was murdered by one of
his followers in 1967, two of his chief lieutenants, Robert Brannen
and Cliff Herrington, formed the National Socialist American Workers
Freedom Movement in St. Paul, Minn. Leadership passed to Jeff Schoep
in 1994, who renamed the group the National Socialist Movement.
The NSM is now one of the largest neo-Nazi organizations in the
country. The resurgence of the NSM began in 2004, in the wake of the
deaths of the country’s two major neo-Nazi leaders, the National
Alliance’s William Pierce (d. 2002) and the Aryan Nations’ Richard
Butler (d. 2004). Also contributing to the vacuum in neo-Nazi
leadership of the nation was the 2004 imprisonment of Matt Hale, the
leader of the World Church of the Creator. Hale was sentenced to 40
years in federal prison for soliciting the murder of a federal judge.
Starting in 2004, the NSM began to overshadow all other American neo-
Nazi groups, including two, White Revolution and National Vanguard,
that emerged from the ashes of the National Alliance. The NSM made its
presence felt through frequent theatrical street actions undertaken in
Nazi garb. Unlike other neo-Nazi outfits, the NSM adopted an open-arms
recruiting policy that allowed members of other white supremacist
groups to participate in NSM actions and join the NSM.
Schoep was only 21 years old when he took control of the group in
1994, and his relatively young age has helped him attract a younger
generation of neo-Nazis. In fact, under Schoep’s leadership, the NSM
set up a unit specifically focused on recruiting teens that it called
its Viking Youth Corps. It also launched a Women’s Division and a
Skinhead Division. It bolstered its online presence with a revamped
website featuring the group’s newsletter, downloadable leaflets for
printing and distribution, and field reports from NSM chapters around
the country. The group created its own hate rock music label, NSM88
Records, and in April 2007 purchased the now-popular white supremacist
social networking site New Saxon.
NSM ideology mirrors that of the original American Nazi Party. The
group openly idolizes Adolf Hitler, described in NSM propaganda as,
“Our Fuhrer, the beloved Holy Father of our age … a visionary in every
respect.” NSM says only heterosexual “pure-blood whites” should be
allowed U.S. citizenship and that all nonwhites should be deported,
regardless of legal status. As Schoep put it: “The Constitution was
written by white men alone. Therefore, it was intended for whites
alone.”
The NSM is probably best known for carefully staged protests, carried
out in full-blown Nazi uniforms and swastika armbands, that have
managed to win substantial news coverage for the group. The best
example of the NSM’s provocative rallies came on Dec. 10, 2005, when
the group made international news after a planned march through a
black neighborhood in Toledo, Ohio, sparked rioting by residents and
counter-protesters. The riots cost the city more than $336,000, though
the NSM members escaped the violence and were not liable for any of
the destruction. “The Negro beasts proved our point for us,” Schoep
crowed after the rally.
Subjected for years to movement ridicule for their brown-shirt outfits
— the late National Alliance leader William Pierce called them
“Hollywood Nazis” — NSM national and state chapter leaders voted at
the group’s national congress in April 2007 to switch to “more
militant looking” black battle dress uniforms (BDUs).
The NSM has had its share of movement scandal. In July 2006, it was
rocked by revelations that co-founder and chairman emeritus Cliff
Herrington’s wife was the “High Priestess” of the Joy of Satan
Ministry, and that her satanic church shared an address with the
Tulsa, Okla., NSM chapter. The exposure of Herrington’s wife’s
Satanist connections caused quite a stir, particularly among those NSM
members who adhered to a racist (and heretical) variant of
Christianity, Christian Identity. Before the dust settled, both
Herringtons were forced out of NSM. Bill White, the neo-Nazi group’s
energetic spokesman, also quit, taking several NSM officials with him
to create a new group, the American National Socialist Workers Party.
In December 2006, “Wild” Bill Hoff, one of the NSM’s oldest and best-
known members and a “colonel” in the group, died in a car accident at
the age of 71. This was particularly notable because Hoff’s anti-
racist brother decided four months after the death to reveal a
remarkable fact — Hoff, along with other members of his family, had
black ancestors, a dreadful secret in the world of neo-Nazism.
Another embarrassment was in store for the NSM. In late 2006, Schoep
and World Knights of the Ku Klux Klan leader Gordon Young announced
with great fanfare that Young was quitting the Klan to become the
NSM’s Maryland leader. But that went south in January 2007, when Young
was charged with sexually assaulting a young girl. He was acquitted,
but not before embarrassing Schoep. In late 2010, Young left the NSM
with half a dozen other members.
Jeff Schoep’s personal life has been the source of other movement
criticism as well. In April 2010, John Taylor Bowles, who was the
NSM’s 2008 presidential candidate, alleged on his blog that Schoep was
a race traitor because he had married a woman with a mixed-race child
from a previous marriage. (Schoep had left his previous girlfriend in
Minnesota and moved to Detroit to be with his new lover. In 1998, he
was arrested with the previous girlfriend while aiding a burglary; at
the time, the couple’s children were left waiting in a getaway car.)
Despite these embarrassments, the NSM remained the largest neo-Nazi
group in the United States. By 2009, the NSM had 61 chapters in 35
states, making it the largest neo-Nazi group in the country.
A growing number of the NSM’s protests have targeted immigrants
recently. On June 19, 2010, NSM members J.T. Ready, Jeff Hall and
about eight other individuals (some of whom were not NSM members)
congregated in Arizona’s Vekol Valley. Hall described the goal of
their operation as to “fight the [Mexican drug] cartels and reclaim
the land.” Armed with pistols and high-powered rifles, the group led
patrols through the desert and “secured” an abandoned building. They
claimed to have apprehended three illegal immigrants attempting a
border crossing, although this has not been independently confirmed.
On May 1, 2011, the 10-year-old son of Hall, who was serving as the
NSM's southwest regional leader, was arrested for allegedly shooting
his neo-Nazi father to death. According to The Associated Press and an
L.A. Times story that cited court documents and police reports, the
boy apparently had been pushed to the breaking point by his father's
abuse of him and his stepmother and was also frightened that he'd have
to choose between them if his father's behavior led to a divorce.
The Revd
Jan 6, 2012, 6:54:47 AM1/6/12
to
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 19:27:42 -0500, P-Dumb <pwol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
Go fuck yourself, P-Dumb, you jewloving piece of shite.
wrote:
The Peeler
Jan 6, 2012, 7:45:46 AM1/6/12
to
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:54:47 -0500, The Rectum, the resident psychopath of
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
mentioned, didn't you, you hilarious psychotic shithead? LMAO!
--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").
sci and scj and Usenet's famous sexual cripple, FAKING his time zone again,
farted:
,
>>but you are a complete loser shithead.
>>
>>FOAD you turd.
>
> Go fuck yourself, P-Dumb, you jewloving piece of shite.
You did feel personally addressed again when "complete loser shithead" was
>>but you are a complete loser shithead.
>>
>>FOAD you turd.
>
> Go fuck yourself, P-Dumb, you jewloving piece of shite.
mentioned, didn't you, you hilarious psychotic shithead? LMAO!
--
Retarded, subnormal and extremely proud of it: our resident psychopath, The
Retard (aka "The Rectum").
Michael Ejercito
Jan 6, 2012, 12:59:42 PM1/6/12
to
On Jan 5, 5:28 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
> were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
> Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
> Mein Kampf:
>
> "The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
> Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist.
When was the last time you were mentioned in the Jewish Press?
> It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they
> were not liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the
> Jews controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from
> Mein Kampf:
>
> "The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
> Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist.
>The
> best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
> strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
> arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.
You are a Nazi.
As a Nazi, you are, above all else, a craven coward.
You are afraid to compete with others as equals because you know
you can not measure up.
You are afraid of your own inadequacy, so you want to murder your
betters.
You are afraid of the truth, so you want to murder those who would
tell it.
You are afraid of history, so you want to murder the past, to wipe
out the knowledge of the degeneracy, cowardice and failure of
National
Socialism.
Finally, you are afraid of the power of educated, informed adults.
Freedom of choice terrifies you... which is why you choose minor
children as sexual partners. You can not interact with competent
adults in a consensually sexual
way. You need to be able to impose yourself on a helpless victim, be
it a prepubescent
boy, or a patient in a mental hospital.
That is what you are, a Nazi, and there is nothing polite or
honest about it.
Michael
Topaz
Jan 6, 2012, 9:12:30 PM1/6/12
to
Topaz
Jan 6, 2012, 9:12:59 PM1/6/12
to
Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences. I
shrugged my shoulders as I read the dark prose of the red press and
awaited expectantly the decisive evening.
Around 8 p.m. we drove in an old rusty car from the city center to
Wedding. A cold gray mist hung under a starless sky. Our hearts were
bursting with impatience and expectation.
As we drove down Müllerstraße it was already clear that the evening
did not bode well. Groups of dark figures stood on every street
corner. They apparently planned to teach our party members a bloody
lesson before they even got to the meeting.
Dark masses of people stood outside the Pharus Hall, expressing their
rage and hate with loud and impudent threats.
The leader of the protective forces cleared a way for us and reported
briefly that the hall had been packed since 7:15 p.m. and had been
closed by police. About two-thirds of the audience were Red Front
Fighters. That was what we wanted. There would be a decision. We were
ready to give it all we had.
Entering the hall, we encountered a warm, stiffling aroma of beer and
tobacco. The hall was hot. A lively roar of voices filled the hall.
People were packed in tightly. We reached the podium only with
difficulty.
No sooner was I recognized than hundreds of voices filled with rage
and revenge thundered in my ears: "Bloodhound! Murder of Workers!"
Those were the mildest words they shouted. But a welcoming group of
some party members and S.A. Men answered with passion. Excited battle
cries sounded from the platform. I saw immediately that we were a
minority, but a minority determined to fight, and therefore win.
It was still our custom then for an S.A. leader to chair all of the
party's public meetings. Here too. Tall as a tree he stood up front
and asked for silence with his upraised arm. That was easier said than
done. Mocking laughter was the answer. Insults flew toward the
platform from every corner of the room. People growled and screamed
and raged. There were world revolutionaries scattered about who
apparently had gained the courage they needed by drinking. It was
impossible to quiet the hall. The class-conscious proletariat had not
come to discuss but to fight, to break things up, to put an end to the
Fascist specter with callused workers' fists.
We were not uncertain, even for a moment. We also knew that if the
enemy did not succeed this time in what he had threatened, the future
success of the movement in Berlin was assured.
Fifteen or twenty S.A. and S.S. men stood before the platform in
uniforms and arm bands, an impudent and direct provocation to the Red
Front Fighters. Behind me was a select group of reliable people ready
at any moment to risk their lives to defend me from the onrushing red
mob with brutal force.
The Communists made an obvious mistake in their tactics. They had
scattered small groups throughout the hall, but clumped most of the
rest in the right rear of the hall. I recognized immediately that
there was the center of unrest, and if anything was to be done, we
first had to deal ruthlessly with them. Whenever the chair tried to
open the meeting, a dark chap stood up on a stool and shouted "Point
of Order!" Hundreds of others yelled the same after him.
If one takes from the mass their leader or also their seducer, they
are leaderless and easily controlled. Our tactic therefore was to
silence this cowardly troublemaker at any cost. He felt secure back
there, surrounded by his comrades. We tried to do this peacefully a
few times. The chair shouted over the uproar: "There will be
discussion afterward! But we determine the rules of order!"
That was an ineffective attempt at an unsuitable object. The screamer
wanted to throw the meeting into confusion by his endless shouts and
bring things to the boiling point. Then a general melee would result.
As our efforts to bring the meeting to order peacefully proved
unsuccessful, I took the head of the defensive forces to the side, and
immediately after groups of his men slipped through the thundering
Communist masses. Before the astonished and surprised Red Front troops
realized what was happening, our comrades had hauled the troublemaker
down from his stool and brought him through the raging crowd to the
podium. That was unexpected, but what followed was no surprise. A beer
glass flew through the air and crashed to the floor. That was the
signal for the first major meeting hall battle. Chairs were broken and
legs ripped from tables. Glasses and bottles suddenly appeared and all
hell broke loose. The battle raged for ten minutes. Glasses, bottles,
table and chair legs flew randomly through the air. A deafening roar
rose; the red beast was set free and wanted its victims.
At first it looked as if we were lost. The Communist attack was sudden
and explosive, completely unexpected. But soon the S.A. and S.S. men
distributed throughout the hall and in front of the platform recovered
from their surprise and counterattacked with bold courage. It quickly
became clear that although the Communist Party had masses behind it,
these masses became cowards when faced with a firmly disciplined and
determined opponent. They ran. In short order the red mob that had
come to break up our meeting had been driven from the hall. The order
that could not be secured by good will was gained by brute force.
Usually one is not aware of the stages of a meeting hall battle. Only
later does one recall them. I still remember a scene that I will never
forget; on the podium stood a young S.A. man whom I did not know. He
was hurling his missiles into the on-coming red mob. Suddenly a beer
glass thrown from the distance hit him on the head. A wide stream of
blood ran down his face. He sank with a cry. After a few seconds he
stood up again, grabbed water bottle from the table and threw it into
the hall, where it clattered against the head of an opponent.
The face of this young man is engraved in my memory. This
lightening-fast moment is unforgettable. This gravely-wounded S.A. man
would soon, and indeed for all times, become my most reliable and
loyal comrade.
Only after the red mob had been driven howling, growling and cursing
from the field could one tell how serious and costly the battle had
been. Ten lay in their blood on the platform, most with head injuries,
two with severe concussions. The table and stairs to the platform were
covered in blood. The whole hall resembled a field of ruins.
In the midst of this bloody and ruined wasteland, our tree-high S.A.
leader resumed his place and declared with iron calm: "The meeting
will continue. The speaker has the floor."
Never before or since have I spoken under such dramatic conditions.
Behind me, groaning in pain and bleeding, were seriously injured S.A.
comrades. Around me were broken chair legs, shattered beer glasses and
blood. The whole meeting was icily silent.
We lacked then a medical corps. Since we were in a proletarian
district, we had to have our seriously wounded carried out by
so-called worker volunteers. There were scenes outdoors of
unimaginable inhumanity. The bestial people who were supposedly
fighting for universal brotherhood insulted our poor and defenseless
injured with phases like: "Isn't that pig dead yet?"
Under such conditions it was impossible to give a coherent speech.
Scarcely had I begun to speak when another group of volunteers entered
the hall to carry off a seriously wounded S.A. man on a stretcher. One
of them, encountering the brutal apostles of humanity outside the door
and their unflattering and crude language, shouted for me in
desperation. His voice could be heard loudly and unmistakably on the
platform I interrupted my speech and went through the hall, where
there were still scattered Communist commando groups. Still surprised
by what had happened, they stood quietly and shyly to the side. I bade
farewell to the seriously wounded S.A. comrades.
NEMO
Jan 6, 2012, 10:21:27 PM1/6/12
to
Topaz, you're a homo!
NEMO
Jan 6, 2012, 10:24:26 PM1/6/12
to
Hmmmmmmm, lets see now, Adolf Schikelgruber/Hitler was in a
homosexual
relationship with Ernst Roehm & had him killed, he had an incestual
relationship with his niece Geli & she would piss on him (Golden
Showers) & he had her killed!
He only had one testicle & couldn't perform the sex act with Eva
Braun
& he killed her before killing himself - a eunuch in fact!
He was a confirmed drug addict - by his own doctors accounts!
Just youR typical Nazi, just like Topaz the Faggot (& he has the
same sex & drug problems)!
Ayup!
homosexual
relationship with Ernst Roehm & had him killed, he had an incestual
relationship with his niece Geli & she would piss on him (Golden
Showers) & he had her killed!
He only had one testicle & couldn't perform the sex act with Eva
Braun
& he killed her before killing himself - a eunuch in fact!
He was a confirmed drug addict - by his own doctors accounts!
Just youR typical Nazi, just like Topaz the Faggot (& he has the
same sex & drug problems)!
Ayup!
ag...@salt.pot
Jan 7, 2012, 1:13:39 PM1/7/12
to
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 06:54:47 -0500, The Revd <pee...@degenerate.Grik>
wrote:
Not everyone can fuck themselves, foreskin lover. Demonstrate how you
do it, Revd.
wrote:
do it, Revd.
Michael Ejercito
Jan 7, 2012, 3:55:23 PM1/7/12
to
On Jan 6, 6:12 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
The Nazi nithings lost that one.
> Here is a quote from "The Battle for Berlin" by Joseph Goebbels:
>
> We had no idea of the danger that threatened us then. I myself did not
> yet know Marxism well enough to foresee the possible consequences.
You are a nithing- homo sapiens by birth, subhuman BY CHOICE. The
key word is CHOICE. You were born with the same human nature as the
rest of us. Your CHOICES made you a nithing.
Bill explains what nithings are.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=9446
Define and Dehumanize the Enemy: Jihadists as Nithings or Nidings
by Bill Levinson
It is an ancient principle of magic (which modern people recognize as
stories that reflect a society’s culture and psychology) that
knowledge of a person’s real or True Name delivers power over that
person. What it really means is that, if you know the person’s
psychology, you can gain an advantage over him. It is also well known
that the side that controls the language of an argument controls the
argument. As an example, Hamas terrorists and their enablers refer to
Israel’s military as an “occupation force” and terrorisitic violence
against civilians as “resistance.”
We have long sought a single word that strips the enemy of all
humanity, and reduces him to something less than an animal that is
worthy of nothing less than extermination. As far as we know, the
English language contains no such word, although “dreck” (garbage or
refuse) comes close. “Homo sapiens by BIRTH, subhuman by CHOICE”
describes Islamic supremacists perfectly, but it is a phrase and not a
word. We now propose to refer to Islamic supremacists as nithings or
nidings: a Scandinavian word that strips its object of all humanity.
Webster’s dictionary (1913) defines it as “A coward; a dastard; — a
term of utmost opprobrium.”
We remind readers who object to the dehumanization of Islamic
supremacists that those enemies are already attempting to dehumanize
Jews, and to a lesser degree Christians, with images that could have
come directly from Adolf Hitler. As they have chosen to sow the
dragon’s teeth, our position is that they must now reap their rightful
harvest: the complete hatred and loathing of all civilized human
beings.
nithings
Nithing or niding was more than a common insult, because Scandinavian
culture required its subject to fight a duel with the accuser or
become an outlaw: totally devoid of rights, honor, and even
recognition as a human being. Per the Wikipedia entry,
The actual meaning of the adjective argr or ragr [= Anglo-Saxon
earg] was the nature or appearance of effeminacy, especially by
obscene acts. Argr was the worst, most derogatory swearword of all
known to the Norse language. According to Icelandic law, the accused
was expected to kill the accuser at once. …If the accused did not
retort by violent attack yielding either the accuser to take his words
back or the accuser’s death, he was hence proven to be a weak and
cowardly nithing by not retorting accordingly.
A nithing was devoid of all human rights, and he was considered the
enemy of civilized humanity: a perfect depiction of Islamic
supremacists. The word therefore strips the enemy of all humanity, and
degrades him to the status of a wolf or strangler (per Scandinavian
tradition) or a virulent disease like the Black Plague. Black Plague
is a deadly and contagious disease whose vector consists of plague-
carrying rats, while the Green Plague of militant “Islam” is a deadly
and contagious ideology that is spread by bipedal rats: nidings or
nithings, non-humans that raise violent hands to all of civilized
Humanity.
The immediate consequence of being proven a nithing was
outlawing. The outlawed did not have any rights, he was exlex (Latin
for “outside of the legal system”), in Anglo-Saxon utlah, Middle Low
German uutlagh, Old Norse utlagr. Just as feud yielded enmity among
kinships, outlawry yielded enmity of all humanity.[63] …”Yet that is
but one aspect of outlawry. The outlaw is not only expelled from the
kinship, he is also regarded henceforth as an enemy to mankind.”
The actual definition of a nithing is somewhat more involved and
complex, and it gets into sexual perversions and zoomorphical
transformations (Loki’s transformation of himself into a mare to have
sexual intercourse with a stallion, and thus beget Odin’s horse
Sleipner is probably an example), but the following line is pertinent:
“The nithing used its malicious seid magic to destroy anything owned
and made by man, ultimately the human race and Midgard itself[6], due
to its basically unlimited envy, hate, and malice that were nith.”
“Destruction of everything owned and made by Man” (the Palestinians’
destruction of the greenhouses in Gaza comes to mind immediately) and
“unlimited envy, hate, and malice” describe militant “Islam”
perfectly, and further underscore the application of nithing or niding
to describe it. The propensity for mindless destruction also appears
in Orson Scott Card’s Alvin Maker series, in which a supernatural
enemy is known as the Unmaker: a personification of evil that is the
total antithesis of God the Creator.
The Unmaker is the main antagonist in Orson Scott Card’s
alternate history/fantasy series The Tales of Alvin Maker. Never
directly confronted, it is a supernatural force that breaks apart
matter and aims to destroy and consume everything and everyone. …To
make something is to oppose the Unmaker, but a point often made is
that this is futile. By natural law the Unmaker can tear down faster
than any man can build.
This also is an outstanding definition of militant “Islam” or Islamic
supremacy: an ideology that seeks to destroy everything into which it
comes in contact, and with which no reason, negotiation, or compromise
is possible.
In summary, a nithing or niding is the enemy of Civilization, a
subhuman (through its behavioral choices, and emphatically NOT due to
its racial or ethnic origin) monster with total hatred and malice
toward all human industry and arts, and worthy of nothing but
extermination like any virulent disease. This is the word we will now
apply to Islamic supremacists and their enablers, and we encourage
others to do likewise.
Topaz
Jan 7, 2012, 7:37:23 PM1/7/12
to
Jewish Leaders in the Homosexual Movement
Larry Kramer -- co-founder of "Act Up," a homosexual/AIDS activist
organization; co-founder of the Gay Men's Health Crisis
Alan Klein -- co-founder of group ACT UP, co-founder of group Queer
Nation, National Communications Director and chief spokesperson for
the Gay & LesbianAlliance Against Defamation [GLAAD]. Klein also co-
founded the successful multimedia campaign STOPDRLAURA.COM
Arnie Kantrowitz -- co-founder of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against
Defamation [GLAAD].
Jonathan D. Katz -- founded and chairs the Harvey Milk Institute, the
largest queer studies institute in the world. A long time queer
political activist, was a co-founder of Queer Nation, [the key San
Francisco branch].
Harvey Fierstein -- film actor [Mrs. Doubtfire]; well-known gay
activist.
Moises Kaufman -- playwright and film director [The Laramie Project].
Israel Fishman -- founder of the Gay Liberation Caucus in 1970 [now
known as the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgendered Round Table of
the American Library Association], the world's first gay professional
organization.
Bella Abzug and Edward Koch -- both Jewish -- the first members of the
US. House of Representatives to introduce legislation banning
discrimination based on sexual orientation [1974].
Winnie Stachelberg -- political director, Human Rights Campaign [HRC]
Michael S. Aronowitz, The New York Log Cabin Republicans.
Tony Kushner -- gay activist; Tony and 1993 Pulitzer Prize-winning
playwright [for Angels in America, 1992].
Len Hirsch -- president of the GLBT federal government employees
group, GLOBE.
Meg Moritz, Ph.D. -- a Director and member of the Executive Committee
of GLAAD.
Barbara Raab -- an NBC-TV producer; a "Jewish lesbian feminist
journalist, writer."
Charles Kaiser [?] -- author & founding member of National Lesbian and
Gay Journalists Association [NLGJA].
David Goodstein -- owner/publisher of the gay magazine The Advocate
[1975-1985]; co-founder of the National Gay Rights Lobby.
Judy Wieder -- Editor-in-chief, The Advocate gay magazine.
Alison Bechdel [?] -- cartoonist creator and author of the bi-weekly
comic strip "Dykes to Watch Out For."
Kevin Koffler -- Editor-in-chief, Genre gay magazine.
Garrett Glaser -- National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association
[NLGJA] national board member.
Ronald Gold -- reporter for Variety; a leader in the fight to overturn
the American Psychiatric Association's policy that homosexuality is an
illness.
Magnus Hirschfeld [d. 1935], early gay rights activist in Germany;
founded one of the first gay rights organizations, the Scientific
Humanitarian Committee; coined the term "transvestism"; fled Nazi
Germany.
Fred Hochberg -- deputy administrator, U.S. Small Business
Administration; co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign [HRC].
Michael Berman -- member, Human Rights Campaign Board of Directors.
Mitchell Gold -- HRC Board
Marty Lieberman -- HRC Board
Andy Linsky -- HRC Board
Dana Perlman -- HRC Board
Abby Rubenfeld -- HRC Board
Andrew Tobias -- HRC Board
Lara Schwartz -- Senior Counsel, HRC
Heather Wellman -- HRC Field Coordinator
Dan Furmansky -- HRC Senior Field Organizer, West
Sally Green -- HRC Associate Field Director
Rick Rosendall [?] -- President, Gay & Lesbian Activists Alliance of
Washington, DC.
Barney Frank -- member of U.S. Congress; helped create non-
discriminatory employment policies in all U.S. federal agencies
Kerry Lobel -- executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task
Force.
Robin Margolis, American coordinator of the Bi Women's Cultural
Alliance and author [Bisexuality: A Practical Guide].
Evan Wolfson, Senior Staff Attorney, Lambda Legal Defense and
Education Fund -- and -- the executive director of Freedom to Marry.
Jennifer Einhorn -- Communications Director, Gay & Lesbian Alliance
Against Defamation [GLAAD]
Nancy Alpert [?] -- Treasurer, GLAAD
Judy Gluckstern -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Stephen M. Jacoby -- Board of Directors, GLAAD.
Matt Riklin -- Board, GLAAD
Carol Rosenfeld -- Board, GLAAD.
William Weinberger -- Board, GLAAD
Tanya Wexler -- Board, GLAAD.
David Huebner -- GLAAD Counsel.
Richard Goldstein -- Village Voice writer on gay culture and politics
Ron Schlittler -- Director of Field & Policy, Parents and Friends of
Lesbians and Gays [PFLAG].
Craig Ziskin -- Deputy Director of Development, PFLAG.
Debra Weill -- Senior Field & Policy Coordinator, PFLAG.
Dody Goldstein -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
David Horowitz -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Shawn Frank -- Board of Directors, PFLAG.
Leon Weinstein -- Chair, Nominating Committee, PFLAG.
Kate Kendell [?], National Center for Lesbian Rights.
Gayle Rubin -- lesbian author/activist.
Hilary Rosen -- a founding member of the Gay and Lesbian Victory Fund;
former board co-chair of the Human Rights Campaign.
Roz Richter, American attorney and activist.
Bob Kunst -- long-time activist in gay and Jewish causes.
"Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network" [GLSEN]. Board co-chairs:
Marty Seldman, president
"National Gay & Lesbian Task Force" [NGLTF].
Board co-chairs: ..... Rachel Rosen in Santa Fe, N.M
Dave Fleischer -- Director of Training [political training], NGLTF.
Craig Hoffman -- Board of Directors, NGLTF.
Beth Zemsky -- Board, NGLTF.
Marsha C. Botzer -- Treasurer, NGLTF.
Jeff Levi -- first, Levi was NGTF's lobbyist, early 1980s [NGTF became
NGLTF in 1985]. Later, he was NGLTF executive director.
Bill Rubenstein, J.D. '86, developed the ACLU Lesbian and Gay Rights
Project
Martin Duberman -- author/historian; founded the Center for Lesbian
and Gay Studies at the City University of New York.
Ben Schatz '81, J.D. '85, is executive director of the Gay and Lesbian
Medical Foundation.
Kevin Schaub, American; Executive Director and Dean of the Harvey Milk
Institute in San Francisco, the world's largest center for queer
studies.
Sarah Schulman [1958- ], American playwright, novelist, and activist
[one of the founders of the Lesbian Avengers, a direct-action lesbian
rights organization].
Susan Spielman -- principal/head of Common Ground, an education/
consulting firm specializing in workplace sexual orientation
education; her company has worked with hundreds of U.S. organizations,
helping them to implement domestic partner benefits plans; co-author
of the book Straight Talk About Gays in the Workplace.
Gertrude Stein -- wrote the first openly lesbian novel, "Q.E.D.," in
1903, but it was only published posthumously in 1950.
Rikki Streicher (1925-1994), American activist and businesswoman.
Michael Goff -- founded Out magazine in 1992.
Paulette Goodman -- founder of local chapter [Washington D.C.] of
PFLAG and served as President of the National PFLAG organization from
1988-1992.
Jeffrey Newman, American, president and COO of the Gay Financial
Network; president and CEO of out.com.
Jim Levin -- New York gay historian.
Barrett Brick -- GLAA [Gay and Lesbian Activists Alliance] Treasurer.
Robin Tyler -- American comedian [born Arlene Chernick] who was the
first openly gay comic in North America; Tyler is also an activist who
was the stage producer for the first three gay marches on Washington
and the national protest coordinator for the "Stop Dr. Laura"
campaign; she produces women's comedy and music festivals, and
operates a lesbian travel-tour company.
Dr. Bruce Voeller [1935?-1994] [?] American gay rights activist,
molecular biologist, physiologist, and AIDS researcher (pioneer in the
use of nonoxynol-9 as a spermicide); cofounder and first executive
director of the National Gay Task Force; creator of the Mariposa
Foundation [an AIDS prevention research organization].
Mark Elderkin [?] -- co-founded Gay.com.
Leroy Aarons -- American professor, journalist, and founder of the
National Gay and Lesbian Journalists Association (1990).
Dr. Donald I. Abrams -- American physician, HIV expert, medical
marijuana researcher, and past president of the Gay and Lesbian
Medical Association.
Johnny Abush (1952-2000) -- [Canadian]; archivist of the International
Jewish GBLT Archives.
Roberta Achtenberg [1950- ]; civil rights lawyer and federal official;
appointed as Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity by President Bill Clinton in 1993.
Miriam Ben-Shalom [1948- ], American Army Reserves drill sergeant and
gay activist; in 1986 she won a ten-year legal battle with the
Reserves
when a court ordered her reinstatement; founder of the Gay, Lesbian,
and Bisexual Veterans Association [GLBVA] in 1990, serving as its
first president.
Larry Brinkin, American gay activist who brought the first domestic
partnership lawsuit [against Southern Pacific Railroad, 1982].
Rob Eichberg, American psychologist, co-creator of National Coming Out
Day [October 11th].
Scott Evertz, American; in April 2001, President Bush appointed him to
serve as the Director of the White House Office of National AIDS
Policy [ONAP].
Gene Falk [?, Jewish name], American business executive; Senior Vice
President of the Showtime Digital Media Group; part of the team that
launched and marketed the U.S. TV series Queer as Folk; Chair of the
Board of Directors of the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation
[GLAAD].
Surina Kahn -- American lesbian activist.
Larry Kessler -- founding director in 1983 of the AIDS Action
Committee of Massachusetts, the largest AIDS support organization in
New England.
Kathy Levinson -- American investor and philanthropist; serves on the
board of PlanetOut; also on NGLTF Board of Directors.
Judith Light -- actress, activist for gay causes.
David Mixner -- gay activist, political consultant; co-founder of the
Municipal Elections Committee of Los Angeles [MECLA], a group of
wealthy gays and lesbians who became influential in local politics;
president Bill Clinton's Special Liaison to the Gay-Lesbian Community.
Susan Schuman, American executive vice-president and general manager
of the Planet Out gay and lesbian online service.
Scott Seomin, American entertainment media coordinator for the Gay &
Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation [GLAAD].
Jason Serinus [Jay Guy Nassberg] -- founder and coordinator of the
Lavender Healing Network; a former gay activist with the New York
chapter of the Gay Liberation Front.
David Sine [?] -- American CEO of C1TV, the first U.S. gay and lesbian
cable TV network.
Rex Wockner -- longtime gay, American journalist who has reported news
for the gay press since 1985.
Jack Fritscher -- became Editor in Chief of Drummer gay magazine
[1977].
Leslie Feinberg [1949- ], American trade unionist, transgender
activist and author [Transgender Warriors: Making History from Joan of
Arc to RuPaul].
Allan Ginsburg - late Jewish poet and leading member of North American
Man Boy Love Association
Topaz
Jan 7, 2012, 7:38:14 PM1/7/12
to
Here are some quotes from the German pamphlet "How they Lie" from
1940. The pamphlet has many pictures but the words alone are
interesting enough:
"For example, what would you say if a colleague of yours, whom you
regarded as a rival and who disliked you, were to spread the rumor
that your household is in disorder, that you murder small children and
rape defenseless women? Rest assured that in our country such a person
would soon be behind bars.
But the international politicians and journalists who slander entire
peoples in a shameless manner not only run around freely, they
impudently put on airs as the saviors of human culture. No lie is too
crude for them, no slander too vulgar-they understand their craft.
Even in World War I they knew how to incite hate with the help of
atrocity propaganda. We all recall those daily lies of the "German
barbarian" who, "like a wild beast rages over the earth and destroys
everything in hate and the fury of annihilation, who tortures children
and delights in the tears of mothers," as a foreign paper once wrote.
In war, man stands against man. Each serves the Fatherland in his own
way, and no soldier will deny the knightly convictions of a noble
opponent. Today, however, a cowardly gang of professional agitators
daily invents new lies and pictures from the safety of their desks.
How was the German soldier once depicted by enemy atrocity propaganda?
We all know them, for we had fathers, brothers, sons, and men out
there. For instance, on 20 March 1915, the newspaper "Le Rire Rouge"
published the following picture of the good German soldier:
A bloodthirsty murderer of women and children, a robber and plunderer,
who nourishes himself with sausages made from human flesh-that was how
it saw the brave and loyal German soldier.
Each of us knows what a crude and baseless lie this is. Every decent
person in the world should have known this. And yet: "Some of it will
always be believed, the stupid and gullible will never see through it
all" - so hope the political liars and slanderers.
We know what to think about this flood of slander flowing over the
German people. We heard the same things between 1914 and 1918. Then as
now, they are attempting to drive a wedge between leaders and people.
The goal of this propaganda is always the annihilation of Germany.
We are also familiar with the old lie about the desecration of
churches and shrines, which are once again in fashion with our
enemies.
This is the undamaged cathedral of Tschenstochau.
The picture of the Polish shrine of the Black Madonna, with the German
soldiers in the foreground, was taken after its alleged destruction by
German bombers.
While the lying and yellow press of the entire world and the enemy
transmitters were inventing hypocritical stories about the presumed
destruction of the holy shrine, the Prior of Tschenstochau wrote the
above letter to the German military authorities that clearly testifies
that the monastery and holy shrine were untouched.
Thus the lie regarding supposed German attack could be immediately
exposed. The English Ministry of Advertising has had nothing to say
since.
In reality, these lies are ancient. Our enemies always babble about
violated sanctuaries, persecuted priests, murdered children and
tortured women in order to prejudice the world against Germany and to
arouse the impression that the world must be defended against "the
barbarians who are threatening human culture."
The picture above is taken from a leafet dated 19 August 1914. The
same lie was used back then. Supposedly the Germans had attacked the
monastery at Jasno-Gora.
They always lied, they lie today, they lie, they lie.
There were countless numbers of these malicious pictures in World War
I. Today we see the new versions of this crude charge. Enemy radio
reports reports of drugged candy and poison gas-filled children's
balloons, with which German troops allegedly killed Polish children.
And our enemies decided to spread this vile slander in the exact
moment that the world heard from neutral journalists about the
unimaginable crimes perpetrated by the Polish on fellow German
countrymen. All of these neutral independent reporters saw and
corroborated the terrible atrocities against Germans with their own
eyes. In light of these proven facts, the shameless enemy presumes to
turn the tables and pin these murders on the Germans, declaring that
the murdered, whose names and addresses are known, are Poles.
They hate the Fuehrer, because he exposes their lies and crimes.
They hate him, because he rescued the hard-working German people from
eploitation. How happy they would be to see the Führer and the entire
German people delivered into the dark machinations of the world
Jewry! It shows the impotence of the Jews, since all they can do is
drag a straw man through the streets and burn it.
What do these subhumans know about the joy of a genuine national
community? These warmongers are hard at work rousing the world against
Germany. How little they know about the indisoluble bond between
Führer and people that is so overwhelmingly clear in this picture:
The Fuehrer speaks with German workers.
He knows that he can trust them, and they know that our cause is in
his good hands.
The enemy countries, who are so worried about the fate of the German
people, also worry about the S. A.
We have often seen them; we know how these men look. They are our
comrades, our colleagues in the workplace, our fathers, brothers, sons
and men.
Do they look like this? Since when are these imagined daggers the true
symbol of the S. A.? Once again some professional liar has taken his
pen in his hand.
They lie, they lie....
German men from all regions and occupations use their free time and
energy in regular practice, so they can be ready to serve the
community. When in the summer of 1939 the agricultural labor force was
too small to bring in the rich harvest, these men freely joined in to
help with the harvest, serving the homeland on peaceful fields. Why
does the enemy press, which loves to speak of its objective reporting,
never carry such pictures of Germany?
The more one examines their endless scribbling and radio news, the
clearer one sees that these expert liars have never spoken the truth,
not even once.
This time a newspaper really outdid itself. Here we see how a German
holiday is libeled.
Christmas and Nazi Winter Relief
We all know this picture. It is the Christmas celebration of a German
family that did not have the means by itself to celebrate this holiday
of love in the way the Führer wishes, in the way that every German
family should experience.
The NSV got involved.
Helpers, men and women, walked upstairs and downstairs, heard the
wishes of the needy, and provided gifts.
We all know the results. In any case, the 80 million people of the
greater German Reich know that the liar who drew the picture on the
previous page of an alleged German Christmas is not only a liar but
also an idiot. If the gentlemen wanted to lie, they should have at
least started out more intelligently, so that they were not found out
immediately.
What National Socialist Germany has done and continues to do for
working people is unique in the entire world.
The foreign plutocratic countries that are dominated by high finance
viewed this new and happy life with envy and ill-will. They never
ceased in their endeavor to compel this new Germany into war, to keep
it in the same miserable state it was in after the Treaty of
Versailles.
But Germany knows what it has to lose. And because it is stronger than
the rest of the world, it will end this struggle victoriously.
Mr. Churchill, English warmonger, First Lord of the Admiralty,
architect of the encirclement campaign had it easy in the fall of
1939.
When he decided to wage war against Germany, he selected four English
passenger ships that were sailing to America. Then he sent the above
telegram, dated 28 August 1939, to Cunard White Star Lines, compelling
them to turn German passengers away from these ships, as they would be
uncomfortable eyewitnesses. See the accompanying letter from the
shipping company, dated 29 August 1939. Churchill then sent suitable
"rescue ships" to be "coincidentally" on the course of these ships,
which were now loaded with Americans. The Athenia was torpedoed and
sunk. If the affair with the "Athenia" not worked, then one of the
other three ships would have been sunk,so that Mr. Churchill would
have more stories for the English Ministry of Lies.
We know the rest. The yellow press of the world blows Churchill's
lying horn obediently: a German submarine allegedly sank the
"Athenia."
But the evil, criminal escapade failed. Germany got hold of the
documents and exposed the criminals.
Once again, one of the vilest and most base of the English lies is
exposed.
The following story is perhaps the best way of showing the reality of
moneybags journalism, and how decent foreign journalists are forced to
invent lie afer lie.
A couple of months ago, a foreign journalist whose name we must hide
in order to protect his job, came to Germany. He wanted to see the
alleged "Nazi hell" with his own eyes, in order to give an eyewitness
account.
He saw workers who had jobs. He saw workers taking vacations with the
KdF. And he saw workers going to the theater. He saw the NSV's charity
for the poor. He saw and was amazed.
He had not expected to see that! How could he, knowing the truth,
continue to write lies and false atrocity stories about Germany, like
the financiers of his newspaper want it?...
In German camps, criminals and misfits live in clean and orderly
accommodations, receive sufficient nourishment and have enough time
for both work and play.
The foreign press reporter visited one of these camps.
The officials of the German concentration camp were outraged when they
later read his article.
The article talked about piles of corpses over which the poor reporter
had to climb, of moaning people in dark dungeons, of caning orgies and
other such imaginary atrocities.
The man had seemed so honest. How could he lie like that? What had
happened? The journalist wrote a letter to explain. He had written a
truthful account of what he had seen at the concentration camp.
But the owner of the newspaper switched everything around. Naturally
there are decent foreign papers that would never falsify the facts
like that, but we are not talking about them here.
The newspaperman begged the Germans not to take action against his
paper or the publisher who falsified the report, because then he would
lose his job.
That is how freedom of the press looks like in other countries; that
is how the lies and fairy tales come to be.
The Fuehrer spoke about the criminal newspaper Jews and the war
profiteers, in his speech on 6 October. They order the journalists and
radio reporters around like schoolboys. These "servants of public
opinion" are not allowed to have convictions or express their true
opinions, and only a very few exceptions prove this rule. They must
lie and slander and blacken Germany and its Fuehrer to keep the
gentlemen behind the plutocratic, moneybag policies in business.
But why do these newspaper moneybags lie so crudely, so stupidly, so
impudently? Why do they spread their slander all over Germany of all
places?
They lie because they are weak and Germany is strong. They lie because
they want to make money by going to war against Germany, even though
the people do not want to go to war and are scared to go to war
against a strong Germany...
Things are a thousand times better here. Things are more honest and
fair here than anywhere in the entire world.
Here we recognize the honor of the worker.
Here there is a right to work.
Here the moneybags are not in control...
In conclusion:
We will not be confused by the lies of the foreign countries! We know
what we are fighting for!
Topaz
Jan 7, 2012, 7:38:45 PM1/7/12
to
Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
the bad side won the war.
An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
by Joseph Goebbels
One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
keep humanity in the dark. It is so to speak the mortar that holds the
enemy coalition firmly together, despite its differences of class,
ideology and interests. Capitalism and Bolshevism have the same Jewish
roots, two branches of the same tree that in the end bear the same
fruit. International Jewry uses both in its own way to suppress the
nations and keep them in its service. How deep its influence on public
opinion is in all the enemy countries and many neutral nations is
plain to see that it may never be named in newspapers, speeches and
radio broadcasts. There is a law in the Soviet Union that punishes
anti-Semitism - or in plain English, public education about the Jewish
Question - by death. The expert in these matters is in no way
surprised that a leading spokesman for the Kremlin said over the New
Year that the Soviet Union would not rest until this law was valid
throughout the world. In other words, the enemy clearly says that its
goal in this war is to put the total domination of Jewry over the
nations of the earth under legal protection, and to threaten even a
discussion of this shameful attempt with the death penalty.
It is little different in the plutocratic nations. There the struggle
against the impudent usurpation of the Jewish race is not punished by
the executioner, rather by death through economic and social boycott
and by intellectual terror. This has the same effect in the end.
Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt were made by the Jewry. They enjoy its
full support and reward it with their full protection. They present
themselves in their speeches as upright men of civil courage, yet one
never hears even a word against the Jews, even though there is growing
hatred among their people as a result of this war, a hatred that is
fully justified. Jewry is a tabu theme in the enemy countries. It
stands outside every legal boundary and thus becomes the tyrant of its
host peoples. While enemy soldiers fight, bleed and die at the front,
the Jews make money from their sacrifice on the stock exchanges and
black markets. If a brave man dares to step forward and accuse the
Jews of their crimes, he will be mocked and spat on by their press,
chased from his job or otherwise impoverished, and be brought into
public contempt. Even that is apparently not enough for the Jews. They
want to bring Soviet conditions to the whole world: to give Jewry
absolute power and freedom from prosecution. He who objects or even
debates the matter gets a bullet in the back of his head or an axe
through his neck. There is no worse tyranny than this. This is the
epitome of the public and secret disgrace that Jewry inflicts on the
nations that deserve freedom.
That is all long behind us. Yet it still threatens us in the distance.
We have, it is true, entirely broken the power of the Jews in the
Reich, but they have not given up. They did not rest until they had
mobilized the whole world against us. Since they could no longer
conquer Germany from within, they want to try it from without. Every
Russian, English and American soldier is a mercenary of this world
conspiracy of a parasitic race. Given the current state of the war,
who could still believe that they are fighting and dying at the front
for the national interests of their countries! The nations want a
decent peace, but the Jews are against it. They know that the end of
the war would mean the dawning knowledge of humanity of the unhealthy
role that International Jewry played in preparing for and carrying out
this war. They fear being unmasked, which has in fact become
unavoidable and must inevitably come, just as the day follows the
night. That explains their raging bursts of hatred against us, which
are only the result of their fear and their feelings of inferiority.
They are too eager, and that makes them suspicious. International
Jewry will not succeed in turning this war to its advantage. Things
are already too far along. The hour will come in which all the peoples
of the earth will awake, and the Jews will be the victims. Here too
things can only go so far.
It is an old, often-used method of International Jewry to discredit
education and knowledge about its corrupting nature and drives,
thereby depending on the weaknesses of those people who easily confuse
cause with effect. The Jews are also masters at manipulating public
opinion, which they dominate through their network of news agencies
and press concerns that reaches throughout the world. The pitiful
illusion of a free press is one of the methods they use to stupefy the
publics of enemy lands. If the enemy press is as free as it pretends
to be, let it take an open position, for or against, on the Jewish
Question. It will not do that because it cannot and may not do so. The
Jews love to mock and criticize everything except themselves, although
everyone knows that they are most in need of public criticism. This is
where the so-called freedom of the press in enemy countries ends.
Newspapers, parliaments, statesmen and church leaders must be silent
here. Crimes and vices, filth and corruption are covered by the
blanket of love. The Jews have total control of public opinion in
enemy countries, and he who has that is also master of all of public
life. Only the nations that have to accept such a condition are to be
pitied. The Jews mislead them into believing that the German nation is
backward. Our alleged backwardness is actually proof of our progress.
We have recognized the Jews as a national and international danger,
and from this knowledge have drawn compelling conclusions. This German
knowledge will become the knowledge of he world at the end of this
war. We think it our primary duty to do everything in our power to
make that happen.
Humanity would sink into eternal darkness, it would fall into a dull
and primitive state, were the Jews to win this war. They are the
incarnation of that destructive force that in these terrible years has
guided the enemy war leadership in a fight against all that we see as
noble, beautiful and worth keeping. For that reason alone the Jews
hate it. They despite our culture and learning, which they perceive as
towering over their nomadic worldview. They fear our economic and
social standards, which leave no room for their parasitic drives, They
are the enemy of our domestic order, which has excluded their
anarchistic tendencies. Germany is the first nation in the world that
is entirely free of the Jews. That is the prime cause of its political
and economic balance. Since their expulsion from the German national
body has made it impossible for them to shake this balance from
within, they lead the nations they have deceived in battle against us
from without. It is fine with them, in fact it is part of their plan,
that Europe in the process will lose a large part of its cultural
values. The Jews had no part in their creation. They do not understand
them. A deep racial instinct tells them that since these heights of
human creative activity are forever out of their reach, they must
attack them today with hatred. The day is not distant when the nations
of Europe, yes, even those of the whole world, will shout: The Jews
are guilty for all our misfortunes! They must be called to account,
and soon and thoroughly!
International Jewry is ready with its alibi. Just as during the great
reckoning in Germany, they will attempt to look innocent and say that
one needs a scapegoat, and they are it. But that will no longer help
them, just as it did not help them during the National Socialist
revolution, The proof of their historical guilt, in details large and
small, is so plain that they can no longer be denied even with the
most clever lies and hypocrisy.
Who is it that drives the Russians, the English and the Americans into
battle and sacrifices huge numbers of human lives in a hopeless
struggle against the German people? The Jews! Their newspapers and
radio broadcasts spread the songs of war while the nations they have
deceived are led to the slaughter. Who is it that invents new plans of
hatred and destruction against us every day, making this war into a
dreadful case of self-mutilation and self-destruction of European life
and its economy, education and culture? The Jews! Who devised the
unnatural marriage between England and the USA on one side and
Bolshevism on the other, building it up and jealously ensuring its
continuance? Who covers the most perverse political situations with
cynical hypocrisy from a trembling fear that a new way could lead the
nations to realize the true causes of this terrible human catastrophe?
The Jews, only the Jews! They are named Morgenthau and Lehmann and
stand behind Roosevelt as a so-called brain trust. They are named
Mechett and Sasoon and serve as Churchill's money bags and order
givers. They are named Kaganovitsch and Ehrenburg and are Stalin's
pacesetters and intellectual spokesmen. Wherever you look, you see
Jews. They march as political commisars behind the Red army and
organize murder and terror in the areas conquered by the Soviets. They
sit behind the lines in Paris and Brussels, Rome and Athens, and
fashion their reins from the skin of the unhappy nations that have
fallen under their power.
That is the truth. It can no longer be denied, particularly since in
their drunken joy of power and victory the Jews have forgotten their
ordinarily so carefully maintained reserve and now stand in the
spotlight of public opinion. They no longer bother, apparently
believing that it is no longer necessary, that their hour has come.
And this is their mistake, which they always make when think
themselves near their great goal of anonymous world domination.
Thoughout the history of the nations, whenever this tragic situation
developed, a good providence saw to it that the Jews themselves became
the grave diggers of their own hopes. They did not destroy the healthy
peoples, rather the sting of their parasitic effects brought the
realization of the looming danger to the forefront and led to the
greatest sacrifices to overcome it. At a certain point, they become
that power that always wants evil but creates good. It will be that
way this time too.
The fact that the German nation was the first on earth to recognize
this danger and expel it from its organism is proof of its healthy
instincts. It therefore became the leader of a world struggle whose
results will determine of fate and the future of International Jewry.
We view with complete calm the wild Old Testament tirades of hatred
and revenge of Jews throughout the world against us. They are only
proof that we are on the right path. They cannot unsettle us. We gaze
on them with sovereign contempt and remember that these outbursts of
hate and revenge were everyday events for us in Germany until that
fateful day for International Jewry, 30 January 1933, when the world
revolution against the Jews that threateend not only Germany, but all
the other nations, began.
It will not cease before it has reached its goal. The truth can not be
stopped by lies or force. It will get through. The Jews will meet
their Cannae at the end of this war. Not Europe, rather they will
lose. They may laugh at this prophecy today, but they have laughed so
often in the past, and almost as often they stopped laughing sooner or
later. Not only do we know precisely what we want, we also know
precisely what we do not want. The deceived nations of he Earth may
still lack the knowledge they need, but we will bring it to them. How
will the Jews stop that in the long run? They believe their power
rests on sure foundations, but it stands on feet of clay. One hard
blow and it will collapse, burying the creators of the misfortunes of
the world in its ruins.
Topaz
Jan 7, 2012, 7:39:41 PM1/7/12
to
Here are some quotes from the book "Kampfzeit", (period of
struggle), by Hans Hinkel:
"Faster than lightening a lie about us spread throughout the country,
spread in every attic room where poor people lived by newspapers owned
or obedient to the opponent. It took a week of work by us National
Socialists to deal with a three-line lie in an opposing newspaper. As
soon as one lie was dealt with, a hundred more sprang up. Like a
hydra, the opponent's horror stories about National Socialism and its
supporters spread. There was not a speech by the Führer or his
associates that was not immediately twisted and tastefully served up
to the gullible Michael at breakfast or dinner. Adolf Hitler had "spat
out the communion wafer." Hermann Göring was smuggling opium or
morphine. Robert Ley has "lost a 'v'" in his name Pastor Münchmeyer
was guilty of "moral crimes" in Borkum. We often would have laughed
had we not hourly learned the amazing gullibility of millions of
German citizens who were trapped in the enemy's web of lies. The only
answer was for everyone to set to work with the people, going
everywhere to fight, speak and educate. Sooner or later the opponent
would have to face us and be revealed as a liar to the public."
"The city was like an upset anthill on that cold winter night. Roland
Freisler ran out from the chattering council meeting and went with us
to the nearby Friedrich Square where we spoke with the starving
masses. We forgot the middle class niceties! We had to stop Moscow
from winning over these citizens driven crazy by hunger, making them
wiling subjects of the insane ideas of Bolshevism"
"Only a few weeks later, I needed an escort to leave or return to my
apartment. Several loyal S.A. men had to be with me all the time,
since Communist unemployed men, unscrupulously incited against us
National Socialists, wanted to attack me now that they knew who I was.
Every day I joined the unemployed who demonstrated in the large
courtyard of the labor office on Giesberg Street. More than once I had
to be met by party members at the Kassel train station to protect me
from lurking Communist terror troops. It was the same or worse for all
of our prominent Kassel party members and S.A. men, just as for the
storm troops of our movement who risked their lives every day and
every hour in every city and every village of Germany. The enemy
naturally was particularly after us speakers. According to the law, we
had to be unarmed. We would have been in deep trouble if a body search
had found a weapon! A nail file was thought to be a weapon. Later even
a party badge, since it had a long needle!"
"The attempts of our party comrades to hold a National Socialist
meeting failed a half dozen times or more. Most meetings were made
impossible by the thousand-fold numerical superiority of the opponent,
or else broken up before they could finish. Our protective service
-every party member in each local group belongs - is still too weak in
most areas to stand up against the red avalanche, driven more and more
by the Communists. One National Socialist against five hundred or even
a thousand citizens, that is how it always is there!"
"After I had spoken about twenty minutes, a worker jumped up on a
table and called upon the "comrades" to leave the meeting of the
"Fascist band." Several dozen start singing the "Internationale" and
we have no choice but to overpower the growling of the comrades with
"Deutschland, Deutschland über alles." Another several hundred leave
the hall. The singing quieted down and peace was slowly restored. I
spoke to several hundred people at the end, all that were left of the
more than a thousand who were there to start."
"For years now we speakers have been traveling through every Gau in
Germany. I speak primarily in Saxony, Brandenburg, Hessen-Nassau and
in the West. We see that even red Saxony is streaming more and more to
National Socialism. The meetings are difficult, but always
successful."
"For how long? When would this hard battle end? When would more
Germans wake up? When would hundreds of thousands finally be ready to
march into battle behind the banner of National Socialism?! - None of
us thinks about the "when." Forward! - Only forward! Each heart won
over is a victory! The day will come...!"
Michael Ejercito
Jan 7, 2012, 9:03:41 PM1/7/12
to
On Jan 7, 4:38 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
> they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
> Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
> great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
> the bad side won the war.
I guess starting the war was not such a good idea.
> Obviously losing the war didn't prove they were wrong. It only proved
> they were outnumbered. Compare the size of Germany to the size of the
> Jewish controlled countries, the USA and the USSR. Hitler made Germany
> great. Of course the Jew parasites couldn't stand that. Unfortunately
> the bad side won the war.
>
> An article by Dr. Joseph Goebbels, January 21, 1945
> The Creators of the World's Misfortunes
> by Joseph Goebbels
>
> One could not understand this war if one did not always keep in mind
> the fact that International Jewry stands behind all the unnatural
> forces that our united enemies use to attempt to deceive the world and
> keep humanity in the dark.
in mind the fact that Nazi nithings stood behind it.
The following link explains them and you.
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/ftp.py?people//m/morton.chris/what-is-a-nazi
Michael
Topaz
Jan 8, 2012, 12:19:01 PM1/8/12
to
By Mark Weber
Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
December 1941. Roosevelt's aid to Britain and the Soviet Union in
violation of American neutrality and international law, his acts of
war against Germany in the Atlantic in an effort to provoke a German
declaration of war against the United States, his authorization of a
vast "dirty tricks" campaign against U.S. citizens by British
intelligence agents in violation of the Constitution, and his
provocations and ultimatums against Japan which brought on the attack
against Pearl Harbor-all this is extensively documented and reasonably
well known.[1]
Not so well known is the story of Roosevelt's enormous responsibility
for the outbreak of the Second World War itself. This essay focuses on
Roosevelt's secret campaign to provoke war in Europe prior to the
outbreak of hostilities in September 1939. It deals particularly with
his efforts to pressure Britain, France and Poland into war against
Germany in 1938 and 1939.
Franklin Roosevelt not only criminally involved America in a war which
had already engulfed Europe. He bears a grave responsibility before
history for the outbreak of the most destructive war of all time.
This paper relies heavily on a little-known collection of secret
Polish documents which fell into German hands when Warsaw was captured
in September 1939.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p135_Weber.html
These documents clearly establish Roosevelt's crucial role in bringing
on the Second World War.
Poland had refused to even negotiate over self-determination for the
German city of Danzig and the ethnic German minority in the so-called
Polish Corridor. Hitler felt compelled to resort to arms when he did
in response to a growing Polish campaign of terror and dispossession
against the one and a half million ethnic Germans under Polish rule.
In my view, if ever a military action was justified, it was the German
campaign against Poland in 1939.
Poland's headstrong refusal to negotiate was made possible because of
a fateful blank check guarantee of military backing from Britain-a
pledge that ultimately proved completely worthless to the hapless
Poles. Considering the lightning swiftness of the victorious German
campaign, it is difficult to realize today that the Polish government
did not at all fear war with Germany. Poland's leaders foolishly
believed that German might was only an illusion. They were convinced
that their troops would occupy Berlin itself within a few weeks and
add further German territories to an enlarged Polish state. It is also
important to keep in mind that the purely localized conflict between
Germany and Poland was only transformed into a Europe-wide
conflagration by the British and French declarations of war against
Germany.
On 9 February 1938, the Polish Ambassador in Washington, Count Jerzy
Potocki, reported to the Foreign Minister in Warsaw on the Jewish role
in making American foreign policy:
The pressure of the Jews on President Roosevelt and on the State
Department is becoming ever more powerful ...
... The Jews are right now the leaders in creating a war psychosis
which would plunge the entire world into war and bring about general
catastrophe. This mood is becoming more and more apparent.
in their definition of democratic states, the Jews have also created
real chaos: they have mixed together the idea of democracy and
communism and have above all raised the banner of burning hatred
against Nazism.
This hatred has become a frenzy. It is propagated everywhere and by
every means: in theaters, in the cinema, and in the press. The Germans
are portrayed as a nation living under the arrogance of Hitler which
wants to conquer the whole world and drown all of humanity in an ocean
of blood.
In conversations with Jewish press representatives I have repeatedly
come up against the inexorable and convinced view that war is
inevitable. This international Jewry exploits every means of
propaganda to oppose any tendency towards any kind of consolidation
and understanding between nations. In this way, the conviction is
growing steadily but surely in public opinion here that the Germans
and their satellites, in the form of fascism, are enemies who must be
subdued by the 'democratic world.'
Ambassador Potocki's report from Washington of 9 January 1939 dealt in
large part with President Roosevelt's annual address to Congress:
President Roosevelt acts on the assumption that the dictatorial
governments, above all Germany and Japan, only understand a policy of
force. Therefore he has decided to react to any future blows by
matching them. This has been demonstrated by the most recent measures
of the United States.
The American public is subject to an ever more alarming propaganda
which is under Jewish influence and continuously conjures up the
specter of the danger of war. Because of this the Americans have
strongly altered their views on foreign policy problems, in comparison
with last year.
Of all the documents in this collection, the most revealing is
probably the secret report by Ambassador Potocki of 12 January 1939
which dealt with the domestic situation in the United States. This
report is given here in full:
The feeling now prevailing in the United States is marked by a growing
hatred of Fascism and, above all, of Chancellor Hitler and everything
connected with Nazism. Propaganda is mostly in the hands of the Jews
who control almost 100 percent radio, film, daily and periodical
press. Although this propaganda is extremely coarse and presents
Germany as black as possible-above all religious persecution and
concentration camps are exploited-this propaganda is nevertheless
extremely effective since the public here is completely ignorant and
knows nothing of the situation in Europe...
It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign
which is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia
is almost completely excluded. If mentioned at all, it is only in a
friendly manner and things are presented in such a way as if Soviet
Russia were working with the bloc of democratic states. Thanks to the
clever propaganda the sympathy of the American public is completely on
the side of Red Spain.
Besides this propaganda, a war psychosis is being artificially
created. The American people are told that peace in Europe is hanging
only by a thread and that war is unavoidable. At the same time the
American people are unequivocally told that in case of a world war,
America must also take an active part in order to defend the slogans
of freedom and democracy in the world.
These groups of people who occupy the highest positions in the
American government and want to pose as representatives of 'true
Americanism' and 'defenders of democracy' are, in the last analysis,
connected by unbreakable ties with international Jewry.
For this Jewish international, which above all is concerned with the
interests of its race, to portray the President of the United States
as the 'idealist' champion on human rights was a very clever move. In
this manner they have created a dangerous hotbed for hatred and
hostility in this hemisphere and divided the world into two hostile
camps. The entire issue is worked out in a masterly manner. Roosevelt
has been given the foundation for activating American foreign policy,
and simultaneously has been procuring enormous military stocks for the
coming war, for which the Jews are striving very consciously. With
regard to domestic policy, it is very convenient to divert public
attention from anti-Semitism, which is constantly growing in the
United States, by talking about the necessity of defending religion
and individual liberty against the onslaught of Fascism.
On 16 January 1939, Polish Ambassador Potocki reported to the Warsaw
Foreign Ministry on another lengthy conversation he had with
Roosevelt's personal envoy, William Bullitt
1. The vitalizing of foreign policy under the leadership of President
Roosevelt, who severely and unambiguously condemns totalitarian
countries.
2. United States preparations for war on sea, land and air will be
carried out at an accelerated pace and will consume the colossal sum
of 1.25 billion dollars.
3. It is the decided opinion of the President that France and Britain
must put an end to any sort of compromise with the totalitarian
countries. They must not get into any discussions aiming at any kind
of territorial changes.
4. They have the moral assurance that the United States will abandon
the policy of isolation and be prepared to intervene actively on the
side of Britain and France in case of war. America is ready to place
its whole wealth of money and raw materials at their disposal.
The Polish Ambassador to Paris, Juliusz (Jules) Lukasiewicz, sent a
top secret report to the Foreign Ministry in Warsaw at the beginning
of February 1939 which outlined U.S. policy towards Europe as
explained to him by William Bullitt:
A week ago, the Ambassador of the United States, William Bullitt
returned to Paris after a three months' leave in America. Meanwhile, I
have had two conversations with him which enable me to inform you of
his views regarding the European situation and to give a survey of
Washington's policy.
The international situation is regarded by official circles as
extremely serious and in constant danger of armed conflict. Those in
authority are of the opinion that if war should break out between
Britain and France on the one hand, and Germany and Italy on the
other, and should Britain and France be defeated, the Germans would
endanger the real interests of the United States on the American
continent. For this reason, one can foresee right from the beginning
the participation of the United States in the war on the side of
France and Britain, naturally some time after the outbreak of the war.
As Ambassador Bullitt expressed it: 'Should war break out we shall
certainly not take part in it at the beginning, but we shall finish
it.'
On 7 March 1939, Ambassador Potocki sent a remarkably lucid and
perceptive report on Roosevelt's foreign policy to his government in
Warsaw. This document was first made public when leading German
newspapers published it in German translation, along with a facsimile
reproduction of the first page of the Polish original, in their
editions of 28 October 1940. The main National Socialist party
newspaper, the Voelkischer Beobachter, published the Ambassador's
report with this observation:
The document itself needs no commentary. We do not know, and it does
not concern us, whether the internal American situation as reported by
the Polish diplomat is correct in every detail. That must be decided
by the American people alone. But in the interest of historical truth
it is important for us to show that the warmongering activities of
American diplomacy, especially in Europe, are once again revealed and
proven by this document. It still remains a secret just who, and for
what motives, have driven American diplomacy to this course. In any
case, the results have been disastrous for both Europe and America.
Europe was plunged into war and America has brought upon itself the
hostility of great nations which normally have no differences with the
American people and, indeed, have not been in conflict but have lived
for generations as friends and want to remain so...
While the Polish documents alone are conclusive proof of Roosevelt's
treacherous campaign to bring about world war, it is fortunate for
posterity that a substantial body of irrefutable complementary
evidence exists which confirms the conspiracy recorded in the
dispatches to Warsaw...
On 19 September 1938 -- that is, a year before the outbreak of war in
Europe-Roosevelt called Lindsay to a very secret meeting at the White
House. At the beginning of their long conversation, according to
Lindsay's confidential dispatch to London, Roosevelt "emphasized the
necessity of absolute secrecy. Nobody must know I had seen him and he
himself would tell nobody of the interview. I gathered not even the
State Department." The two discussed some secondary matters before
Roosevelt got to the main point of the conference. "This is the very
secret part of his communication and it must not be known to anyone
that he has even breathed a suggestion." The President told the
Ambassador that if news of the conversation was ever made public, it
could mean his impeachment. And no wonder. What Roosevelt proposed was
a cynically brazen but harebrained scheme to violate the U.S.
Constitution and dupe the American people.
The President said that if Britain and France "would find themselves
forced to war" against Germany, the United States would ultimately
also join. But this would require some clever maneuvering. Britain and
France should impose a total blockade against Germany without actually
declaring war and force other states (including neutrals) to abide by
it. This would certainly provoke some kind of German military
response, but it would also free Britain and France from having to
actually declare war. For propaganda purposes, the "blockade must be
based on loftiest humanitarian grounds and on the desire to wage
hostilities with minimum of suffering and the least possible loss of
life and property, and yet bring the enemy to his knees." Roosevelt
conceded that this would involve aerial bombardment, but "bombing from
the air was not the method of hostilities which caused really great
loss of life."
The important point was to "call it defensive measures or anything
plausible but avoid actual declaration of war." That way, Roosevelt
believed he could talk the American people into supporting war against
Germany, including shipments of weapons to Britain and France, by
insisting that the United States was still technically neutral in a
non-declared conflict. "This method of conducting war by blockade
would in his [Roosevelt's] opinion meet with approval of the United
States if its humanitarian purpose were strongly emphasized," Lindsay
reported.[19]
The American Ambassador to Italy, William Phillips, admitted in his
postwar memoirs that the Roosevelt administration was already
committed to going to war on the side of Britain and France in late
1938. "On this and many other occasions," Phillips wrote, "I would
like to have told him [Count Ciano, the Italian Foreign Minister]
frankly that in the event of a European war, the United States would
undoubtedly be involved on the side of the Allies. But in view of my
official position, I could not properly make such a statement without
instructions from Washington, and these I never received."[20]
The fateful British pledge to Poland of 31 March 1939 to go to war
against Germany in case of a Polish-German conflict would not have
been made without strong pressure from the White House
In their nationally syndicated column of 14 April 1939, the usually
very well informed Washington journalists Drew Pearson and Robert S.
Allen reported that on 16 March 1939 Roosevelt had "sent a virtual
ultimatum to Chamberlain" demanding that henceforth the British
government strongly oppose Germany. According to Pearson and Allen,
who completely supported Roosevelt's move, "the President warned that
Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the
sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued."[22] Chamberlain
gave in and the next day, 17 March, ended Britain's policy of
cooperation with Germany in a speech at Birmingham bitterly denouncing
Hitler. Two weeks later the British government formally pledged itself
to war in case of German-Polish hostilities.
In a confidential telegram to Washington dated 9 April 1939, Bullitt
reported from Paris on another conversation with Ambassador
Lukasiewicz. He had told the Polish envoy that although U.S. law
prohibited direct financial aid to Poland, it might be possible to
circumvent its provisions. The Roosevelt administration might be able
to supply war planes to Poland indirectly through Britain. "The Polish
Ambassador asked me if it might not be possible for Poland to obtain
financial help and aeroplanes from the United States. I replied that I
believed the Johnson Act would forbid any loans from the United States
to Poland but added that it might be possible for England to purchase
planes for cash in the United States and turn them over to
Poland."[24]
On 25 April 1939, four months before the outbreak of war, Bullitt
called American newspaper columnist Karl von Wiegand, chief European
correspondent of the International News Service, to the U.S. embassy
in Paris and told him: "War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland
has the assurance of the support of Britain and France, and will yield
to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after
Britain and France enter it."[25]
In a lengthy secret conversation at Hyde Park on 28 May 1939,
Roosevelt assured the former President of Czechoslovakia, Dr. Edvard
Benes, that America would actively intervene on the side of Britain
and France in the anticipated European war.[26]
In June 1939, Roosevelt secretly proposed to the British that the
United States should establish "a patrol over the waters of the
Western Atlantic with a view to denying them to the German Navy in the
event of war." The British Foreign Office record of this offer noted
that "although the proposal was vague and woolly and open to certain
objections, we assented informally as the patrol was to be operated in
our interests."[27]
Many years after the war, Georges Bonnet, the French Foreign Minister
in 1939, confirmed Bullitt's role as Roosevelt's deputy in pushing his
country into war. In a letter to Hamilton Fish dated 26 March 1971,
Bonnet wrote: "One thing is certain is that Bullitt in 1939 did
everything he could to make France enter the war."[28] An important
confirmation of the crucial role of Roosevelt and the Jews in pushing
Britain into war comes from the diary of James V. Forrestal, the first
U.S. Secretary of Defense. In his entry for 27 December 1945, he
wrote:
Played golf today with [former Ambassador] Joe Kennedy. I asked him
about his conversations with Roosevelt and [British Prime Minister]
Neville Chamberlain from 1938 on. He said Chamberlain's position in
1938 was that England had nothing with which to fight and that she
could not risk going to war with Hitler. Kennedy's view: That Hitler
would have fought Russia without any later conflict with England if it
had not been for [William] Bullitt's urging on Roosevelt in the summer
of 1939 that the Germans must be faced down about Poland; neither the
French nor the British would have made Poland a cause of war if it had
not been for the constant needling from Washington. Bullitt, he said,
kept telling Roosevelt that the Germans wouldn't fight; Kennedy that
they would, and that they would overrun Europe. Chamberlain, he says,
stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the
war. In his telephone conversations with Roosevelt in the summer of
1939, the President kept telling him to put some iron up Chamberlain's
backside.[29]
"In the West," the Ambassador told Szembek, "there are all kinds of
elements openly pushing for war: the Jews, the super-capitalists, the
arms dealers. Today they are all ready for a great business, because
they have found a place which can be set on fire: Danzig; and a nation
that is ready to fight: Poland. They want to do business on our backs.
They are indifferent to the destruction of our country. Indeed, since
everything will have to be rebuilt later on, they can profit from that
as well."[30]
On 24 August 1939, just a week before the outbreak of hostilities,
Chamberlain's closest advisor, Sir Horace Wilson, went to Ambassador
Kennedy with an urgent appeal from the British Prime Minister for
President Roosevelt. Regretting that Britain had unequivocally
obligated itself in March to Poland in case of war, Chamberlain now
turned in despair to Roosevelt as a last hope for peace. He wanted the
American President to "put pressure on the Poles" to change course at
this late hour and open negotiations with Germany. By telephone
Kennedy told the State Department that the British "felt that they
could not, given their obligations, do anything of this sort but that
we could." Presented with this extraordinary opportunity to possibly
save the peace of Europe, Roosevelt rejected Chamberlain's desperate
plea out of hand. At that, Kennedy reported, the Prime Minister lost
all hope. "The futility of it all," Chamberlain had told Kennedy, "is
the thing that is frightful. After all, we cannot save the Poles. We
can merely carry on a war of revenge that will mean the destruction of
all Europe."[31]
But Roosevelt rejected out of hand this chance to save the peace of
Europe. To a close political crony, he called Kennedy's plea "the
silliest message to me that I have ever received." He complained to
Henry Morgenthau that his London Ambassador was nothing but a pain in
the neck: "Joe has been an appeaser and will always be an appeaser ...
If Germany and Italy made a good peace offer tomorrow, Joe would start
working on the King and his friend the Queen and from there on down to
get everybody to accept it."[33]
Infuriated at Kennedy's stubborn efforts to restore peace in Europe or
at least limit the conflict that had broken out, Roosevelt instructed
his Ambassador with a "personal" and "strictly confidential" telegram
on 11 September 1939 that any American peace effort was totally out of
the question. The Roosevelt government, it declared, "sees no
opportunity nor occasion for any peace move to be initiated by the
President of the United States. The people [sic] of the United States
would not support any move for peace initiated by this Government that
would consolidate or make possible a survival of a regime of force and
aggression."[34]
In the months before armed conflict broke out in Europe, perhaps the
most vigorous and prophetic American voice of warning against
President Roosevelt's campaign to incite war was that of Hamilton
Fish, a leading Republican congressman from New York. In a series of
hard-hitting radio speeches, Fish rallied considerable public opinion
against Roosevelt's deceptive war policy. Here are only a few excerpts
from some of those addresses.[35]
On 6 January 1939, Fish told a nationwide radio audience:
The inflammatory and provocative message of the President to Congress
and the world [given two days before] has unnecessarily alarmed the
American people and created, together with a barrage of propaganda
emanating from high New Deal officials, a war hysteria, dangerous to
the peace of America and the world. The only logical conclusion to
such speeches is another war fought overseas by American soldiers.
All the totalitarian nations referred to by President Roosevelt ...
haven't the faintest thought of making war on us or invading Latin
America.
I do not propose to mince words on such an issue, affecting the life,
liberty and happiness of our people. The time has come to call a halt
to the warmongers of the New Deal, backed by war profiteers,
Communists, and hysterical internationalists, who want us to
quarantine the world with American blood and money.
He [Roosevelt] evidently desires to whip up a frenzy of hate and war
psychosis as a red herring to take the minds of our people off their
own unsolved domestic problems. He visualizes hobgoblins and creates
in the public mind a fear of foreign invasions that exists only in his
own imagination.
On 5 March, Fish spoke to the country over the Columbia radio network:
The people of France and Great Britain want peace but our warmongers
are constantly inciting them to disregard the Munich Pact and resort
to the arbitrament of arms. If only we would stop meddling in foreign
lands the old nations of Europe would compose their own quarrels by
arbitration and the processes of peace, but apparently we won't let
them.
Fish addressed the listeners of the National Broadcasting Company
network on 5 April with these words:
The youth of America are again being prepared for another blood bath
in Europe in order to make the world safe for democracy.
If Hitler and the Nazi government regain Memel or Danzig, taken away
from Germany by the Versailles Treaty, and where the population is 90
percent German, why is it necessary to issue threats and denunciations
and incite our people to war? I would not sacrifice the life of one
American soldier for a half dozen Memels or Danzigs. We repudiated the
Versailles Treaty because it was based on greed and hatred, and as
long as its inequalities and injustices exist there are bound to be
wars of liberation.
The sooner certain provisions of the Versailles Treaty are scrapped
the better for the peace of the world.
I believe that if the areas that are distinctly German in population
are restored to Germany, except Alsace-Lorraine and the Tyrol, there
will be no war in western Europe. There may be a war between the Nazis
and the Communists, but if there is that is not our war or that of
Great Britain or France or any of the democracies.
New Deal spokesmen have stirred up war hysteria into a veritable
frenzy. The New Deal propaganda machine is working overtime to prepare
the minds of our people for war, who are already suffering from a bad
case of war jitters.
President Roosevelt is the number one warmonger in America, and is
largely responsible for the fear that pervades the Nation which has
given the stock market and the American people a bad case of the
jitters.
I accuse the administration of instigating war propaganda and hysteria
to cover up the failure and collapse of the New Deal policies, with 12
million unemployed and business confidence destroyed.
I believe we have far more to fear from our enemies from within than
we have from without. All the Communists are united in urging us to go
to war against Germany and Japan for the benefit of Soviet Russia.
Great Britain still expects every American to do her duty, by
preserving the British Empire and her colonies. The war profiteers,
munitions makers and international bankers are all set up for our
participation in a new world war.
On 21 April, Fish again spoke to the country over nationwide radio:
It is the duty of all those Americans who desire to keep out of
foreign entanglements and the rotten mess and war madness of Europe
and Asia to openly expose the war hysteria and propaganda that is
impelling us to armed conflict.
What we need in America is a stop war crusade, before we are forced
into a foreign war by internationalists and interventionists at
Washington, who seem to be more interested in solving world problems
rather than our own.
In his radio address of 26 May, Fish stated:
He [Roosevelt] should remember that the Congress has the sole power to
declare war and formulate the foreign policies of the United States.
The President has no such constitutional power. He is merely the
official organ to carry out the policies determined by the Congress.
Without knowing even who the combatants will be, we are informed
almost daily by the internationalists and interventionists in America
that we must participate in the next world war.
On 8 July 1939, Fish declared over the National Broadcasting Company
radio network:
If we must go to war, let it be in defense of America, but not in
defense of the munitions makers, war profiteers, Communists, to cover
up the failures of the New Deal, or to provide an alibi for a third
term.
It is well for all nations to know that we do not propose to go to war
over Danzig, power politics, foreign colonies, or the imperialistic
wars of Europe or anywhere in the world.
President Roosevelt could have done little to incite war in Europe
without help from powerful allies. Behind him stood the self-serving
international financial and Jewish interests bent on the destruction
of Germany. The principal organization which drummed up public support
for U.S. involvement in the European war prior to the Pearl Harbor
attack was the cleverly named "Committee to Defend America by Aiding
the Allies." President Roosevelt himself initiated its founding, and
top administration officials consulted frequently with Committee
leaders.[36]
Although headed for a time by an elderly small-town Kansas newspaper
publisher, William Allen White, the Committee was actually organized
by powerful financial interests which stood to profit tremendously
from loans to embattled Britain and from shrewd investments in giant
war industries in the United States.
At the end of 1940, West Virginia Senator Rush D. Holt issued a
detailed examination of the Committee which exposed the base interests
behind the idealistic-sounding slogans:
The Committee has powerful connections with banks, insurance
companies, financial investing firms, and industrial concerns. These
in turn exert influence on college presidents and professors, as well
as on newspapers, radio and other means of communication. One of the
powerful influences used by the group is the '400' and social set. The
story is a sordid picture of betrayal of public interest.
The powerful J.P. Morgan interest with its holdings in the British
Empire helped plan the organization and donated its first expense
money.
Some of the important figures active in the Committee were revealed by
Holt: Frederic R. Coudert, a paid war propagandist for the British
government in the U.S. during the First World War; Robert S. Allen of
the Pearson and Allen syndicated column; Henry R. Luce, the
influential publisher of Time, Life, and Fortune magazines; Fiorella
LaGuardia, the fiery half-Jewish Mayor of Now York City; Herbert
Lehman, the Jewish Governor of New York with important financial
holdings in war industries; and Frank Altschul, an officer in the
Jewish investment firm of Lazard Freres with extensive holdings in
munitions and military supply companies.
If the Committee succeeded in getting the U.S. into war, Holt warned,
"American boys will spill their blood for profiteers, politicians and
'paytriots.' If war comes, on the hands of the sponsors of the White
Committee will be blood-the blood of Americans killed in a needless
war."[37]
In March 1941 a list of most of the Committee's financial backers was
made public. It revealed the nature of the forces eager to bring
America into the European war. Powerful international banking
interests were well represented. J.P. Morgan, John W. Morgan, Thomas
W. Lamont and others of the great Morgan banking house were listed.
Other important names from the New York financial world included Mr.
and Mrs. Paul Mellon, Felix M. and James F. Warburg, and J. Malcolm
Forbes. Chicago department store owner and publisher Marshall Field
was a contributor, as was William Averill Harriman, the railroad and
investment millionaire who later served as Roosevelt's ambassador in
Moscow.
Of course, Jewish names made up a substantial portion of the long
list. Hollywood film czar Samuel Goldwyn of Goldwyn Studios was there,
along with David Dubinsky, the head of the International Ladies
Garment Workers Union. The William S. Paley Foundation, which had been
set up by the head of the giant Columbia Broadcasting System,
contributed to the Committee. The name of Mrs. Herbert H. Lehman, wife
of the New York Governor, was also on the list.[38]
Without an understanding of his intimate ties to organized Jewry,
Roosevelt's policies make little sense. As Jewish historian Lucy
Dawidowicz noted: "Roosevelt himself brought into his immediate circle
more Jews than any other President before or after him. Felix
Frankfurter, Bernard M. Baruch and Henry Morgenthau were his close
advisers. Benjamin V. Cohen, Samuel Rosenman and David K. Niles were
his friends and trusted aides."[39] This is perhaps not so remarkable
in light of Roosevelt's reportedly one-eighth Jewish ancestry.[40]
In his diary entry of 1 May 1941, Charles A. Lindbergh, the American
aviator hero and peace leader, nailed the coalition that was pushing
the United States into war:
The pressure for war is high and mounting. The people are opposed to
it, but the Administration seems to have 'the bit in its teeth' and
[is] hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the Jewish interests in the
country are behind war, and they control a huge part of our press and
radio and most of our motion pictures. There are also the
'intellectuals,' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British agents who are
allowed free rein, the international financial interests, and many
others.[41]
Joseph Kennedy shared Lindbergh's apprehensions about Jewish power.
Before the outbreak of war he privately expressed concerns about "the
Jews who dominate our press" and world Jewry in general, which he
considered a threat to peace and prosperity. Shortly after the
beginning of hostilities, Kennedy lamented "the growing Jewish
influence in the press and in Washington demanding continuance of the
war "[42]
Roosevelt's efforts to get Poland, Britain and France into war against
Germany succeeded all too well. The result was untold death and misery
and destruction. When the fighting began, as Roosevelt had intended
and planned, the Polish and French leaders expected the American
president to at least make good on his assurances of backing in case
of war. But Roosevelt had not reckoned on the depth of peace sentiment
of the vast majority of Americans. So, in addition to deceiving his
own people, Roosevelt also let down those in Europe to whom he had
promised support.
Seldom in American history were the people as united in their views as
they were in late 1939 about staying out of war in Europe. When
hostilities began in September 1939, the Gallup poll showed 94 percent
of the American people against involvement in war. That figure rose to
96.5 percent in December before it began to decline slowly to about 80
percent in the Fall of 1941. (Today, there is hardly an issue that
even 60 or 70 percent of the people agree upon.)[43]
Roosevelt was, of course, quite aware of the intensity of popular
feeling on this issue. That is why he lied repeatedly to the American
people about his love of peace and his determination to keep the U.S.
out of war, while simultaneously doing everything in his power to
plunge Europe and America into war.
In a major 1940 re-election campaign speech, Roosevelt responded to
the growing fears of millions of Americans who suspected that their
President had secretly pledged United States support to Britain in its
war against Germany. These well-founded suspicions were based in part
on the publication in March of the captured Polish documents. The
speech of 23 October 1940 was broadcast from Philadelphia to the
nation on network radio. In the most emphatic language possible,
Roosevelt categorically denied that he had
pledged in some way the participation of the United States in some
foreign war. I give to you and to the people of this country this most
solemn assurance: There is no secret Treaty, no secret understanding
in any shape or form, direct or indirect, with any Government or any
other nation in any part of the world, to involve this nation in any
war or for any other purpose.[44]
We now know, of course, that this pious declaration was just another
one of Roosevelt's many brazen, bald-faced lies to the American
people.
Roosevelt's policies were more than just dishonest-they were criminal.
The Constitution of the United States grants authority only to the
Congress to make war and peace. And Congress had passed several major
laws to specifically insure U.S. neutrality in case of war in Europe.
Roosevelt continually violated his oath as President to uphold the
Constitution. If his secret policies had been known, the public demand
for his impeachment would very probably have been unstoppable.
The Watergate episode has made many Americans deeply conscious of the
fact that their presidents can act criminally. That affair forced
Richard Nixon to resign his presidency, and he is still widely
regarded as a criminal. No schools are named after him and his name
will never receive the respect that normally goes to every American
president. But Nixon's crimes pale into insignificance when compared
to those of Franklin Roosevelt. What were Nixon's lies compared to
those of Roosevelt? What is a burglary cover-up compared to an illegal
and secret campaign to bring about a major war?
Those who defend Roosevelt's record argue that he lied to the American
people for their own good-that he broke the law for lofty principles.
His deceit is considered permissible because the cause was noble,
while similar deception by presidents Johnson and Nixon, to name two,
is not. This is, of course, a hypocritical double standard. And the
argument doesn't speak very well for the democratic system. It implies
that the people are too dumb to understand their own best interests.
It further suggests that the best form of government is a kind of
benevolent liberal-democratic dictatorship.
Roosevelt's hatred for Hitler was deep, vehement, passionate-almost
personal. This was due in no small part to an abiding envy and
jealousy rooted in the great contrast between the two men, not only in
their personal characters but also in their records as national
leaders.
Superficially, the public fives of Roosevelt and Hitler were
astonishingly similar. Both assumed the leadership of their respective
countries at the beginning of 1933. They both faced the enormous
challenge of mass unemployment during a catastrophic worldwide
economic depression. Each became a powerful leader in a vast military
alliance during the most destructive war in history. Both men died
while still in office within a few weeks of each other in April 1945,
just before the end of the Second World War in Europe. But the
enormous contrasts in the lives of these two men are even more
remarkable.
Roosevelt was born into one of the wealthiest families in America. His
was a life utterly free of material worry. He took part in the First
World War from an office in Washington as UnderSecretary of the Navy.
Hitler, on the other hand, was born into a modest provinicial family.
As a young man he worked as an impoverished manual laborer. He served
in the First World War as a front line soldier in the hell of the
Western battleground. He was wounded many times and decorated for
bravery.
In spite of his charming manner and soothing rhetoric, Roosevelt
proved unable to master the great challenges facing America. Even
after four years of his presidency, millions remained unemployed,
undernourished and poorly housed in a vast land richly endowed with
all the resources for incomparable prosperity. The New Deal was
plagued with bitter strikes and bloody clashes between labor and
capital. Roosevelt did nothing to solve the country's deep, festering
racial problems which erupted repeatedly in riots and armed conflict.
The story was very different in Germany. Hitler rallied his people
behind a radical program that transformed Germany within a few years
from an economically ruined land on the edge of civil war into
Europe's powerhouse. Germany underwent a social, cultural and economic
rebirth without parallel in history. The contrast between the
personalities of Roosevelt and Hitler was simultaneously a contrast
between two diametrically different social-political systems and
ideologies.
And yet, it would be incorrect to characterize Roosevelt as merely a
cynical politician and front man for powerful alien interests.
Certainly he did not regard himself as an evil man. He sincerely
believed that he was doing the right and noble thing in pressuring
Britain and France into war against Germany. Like Wilson before him,
and others since, Roosevelt felt himself uniquely qualified and called
upon by destiny to reshape the world according to his vision of an
egalitarian, universalist democracy. He was convinced, as so many
American leaders have been, that the world could be saved from itself
by remodeling it after the United States.
Presidents like Wilson and Roosevelt view the world not as a complex
of different nations, races and cultures which must mutually respect
each others' separate collective identities in order to live together
in peace, but rather according to a selfrighteous missionary
perspective that divides the globe into morally good and evil
countries. In that scheme of things, America is the providentially
permanent leader of the forces of righteousness. Luckily, this view
just happens to correspond to the economic and political interests of
those who wield power in the United States.
President Roosevelt's War
In April 1941, Senator Gerald Nye of North Dakota prophetically
predicted that one day the Second World War would be remembered as
Roosevelt's war. "If we are ever involved in this war, it will be
called by future historians by only one title, 'the President's War,'
because every step of his since his Chicago quarantine speech [of 5
October 1937] has been toward war.[45]
The great American historian, Harry Elmer Barnes, believed that war
could probably have been prevented in 1939 if it had not been for
Roosevelt's meddling. "Indeed, there is fairly conclusive evidence
that, but for Mr. Roosevelt's pressure on Britain, France and Poland,
and his commitments to them before September 1939, especially to
Britain, and the irresponsible antics of his agent provocateur,
William C. Bullitt, there would probably have been no world war in
1939, or, perhaps, for many years thereafter."[46] In Revisionism: A
Key to Peace, Barnes wrote:
President Roosevelt had a major responsibility, both direct and
indirect, for the outbreak of war in Europe. He began to exert
pressure on France to stand up to Hitler as early as the German
reoccupation of the Rhineland in March 1936, months before he was
making his strongly isolationist speeches in the campaign of 1936.
This pressure on France, and also England, continued right down to the
coming of the war in September 1939. It gained volume and momentum
after the quarantine speech of October 1937. As the crisis approached
between Munich and the outbreak of war, Roosevelt pressed the Poles to
stand firm against any demands by Germany, and urged the English and
French to back up the Poles unflinchingly.
There is grave doubt that England would have gone to war in September
1939 had it not been for Roosevelt's encouragement and his assurances
that, in the event of war, the United States would enter on the side
of Britain just as soon as he could swing American public opinion
around to support intervention.
Roosevelt had abandoned all semblance of neutrality, even before war
broke out in 1939, and moved as speedily as was safe and feasible in
the face of anti-interventionist American public opinion to involve
this country in the European conflict.[47]
One of the most perceptive verdicts on Franklin Roosevelt's place in
history came from the pen of the great Swedish explorer and author,
Sven Hedin. During the war he wrote:
The question of the way it came to a new world war is not only to be
explained because of the foundation laid by the peace treaties of
1919, or in the suppression of Germany and her allies after the First
World War, or in the continuation of the ancient policies of Great
Britain and France. The decisive push came from the other side of the
Atlantic Ocean.
Roosevelt speaks of democracy and destroys it incessantly. He slanders
as undemocratic and un-American those who admonish him in the name of
peace and the preservation of the American way of life. He has made
democracy into a caricature rather than a model. He talks about
freedom of speech and silences those who don't hold his opinion.
He talks about freedom of religion and makes an alliance with
Bolshevism.
He talks about freedom from want, but cannot provide ten million of
his own people with work, bread or shelter. He talks about freedom
from the fear of war while working for war, not only for his own
people but for the world, by inciting his country against the Axis
powers when it might have united with them, and he thereby drove
millions to their deaths.
This war will go down in history as the war of President
Roosevelt.[48]
Officially orchestrated praise for Roosevelt as a great man of peace
cannot conceal forever his crucial role in pushing Europe into war in
1939.
It is now more than forty years since the events described here took
place. For many they are an irrelevant part of a best-forgotten past.
But the story of how Franklin Roosevelt engineered war in Europe is
very pertinent-particularly for Americans today. The lessons of the
past have never been more important than in this nuclear age. For
unless at least an aware minority understands how and why wars are
made, we will remain powerless to restrain the warmongers of our own
era.
Notes
1. See, for example: Charles A. Beard, President Roosevelt and
the Coming of the War 1941 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1948);
William Henry Chamberlin, America's Second Crusade (Chicago: Regnery,
1952, 1962); Benjamin Colby, 'Twas a Famous Victory (New Rochelle,
N.Y.: Arlington House, 1979); Frederic R. Sanborn, Design for War (New
York: Devin-Adair, 1951); William Stevenson, A Man Called Intrepid
(New York: Ballantine Books, 1980); Charles C. Tansill, Back Door to
War (Chicago: Regnery, 1952); John Toland, Infamy: Pearl Harbor and
Its Aftermath (New York: Doubleday, 1982).
2. Saul Friedlander, Prelude to Downfall: Hitler and the United
States 1939-1941 (New York: Knopf, 1967), pp. 73-77; U.S., Congress,
House, Special Committee on Investigation of Un-American Activities in
the United States, 1940, Appendix, Part II, pp. 1054-1059.
3. Friedlander, pp. 75-76.
4. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1.
5. Ibid., p. 4, and 31 March 1940, p. 1.
6. New York Times, 30 March 1940, p. 1. Baltimore Sun, 30 March
1940, p. 1.
7. A French-language edition was published in 1944 under the
title Comment Roosevelt est Entre en Guerre.
8. Tansill, "The United States and the Road to War in Europe," in
Harry Elmer Barnes (ed.), Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace (Caldwell,
Idaho: Caxton, 1953; reprint eds., New York: Greenwood, 1969 and
Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review [supplemented],
1982), p. 184 (note 292). Tansill also quoted from several of the
documents in his Back Door to War, pp. 450-51.
9. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Court Historians Versus Revisionism
(N.p.: privately printed, 1952), p. 10. This booklet is reprinted in
Barnes, Selected Revisionist Pamphlets (New York: Arno Press & The New
York Times, 1972), and in Barnes, The Barnes Trilogy (Torrance,
Calif.: Institute for Historical Review, 1979).
10. Chamberlin, p. 60.
11. Edward Raczynski, In Allied London (London: Weidenfeld and
Nicolson, 1963), p. 51.
12. Orville H. Bullitt (ad.), For the President: Personal and
Secret (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972), p. x1v [biographical
foreword]. See also Time, 26 October 1936, p. 24.
13. Current Biography 1940, ed. Maxine Block (New York: H.W.
Wilson, 1940), p. 122 ff.
14. Gisleher Wirsing, Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um
die Weltherrschaft (Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942), p. 224.
15. Bullitt obituary in New York Times, 16 February 1967, p. 44.
16. Jack Alexander, "He Rose From the Rich," Saturday Evening
Post, 11 March 1939, p. 6. (Also see continuation in issue of 18 March
1939.) Bullitt's public views on the European scene and what should be
America's attitude toward it can be found in his Report to the
American People (Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Cambridge: Riverside
Press], 1940), the text of a speech he delivered, with the President's
blessing, under the auspices of the American Philosophical Society in
Independence Hall in Philadelphia shortly after the fall of France.
For sheer, hyperventilated stridency and emotionalist hysterics, this
anti-German polemic could hardly be topped, even given the similar
propensities of many other interventionists in government and the
press in those days.
17. Michael R. Beschloss, Kennedy and Roosevelt (New York: Norton,
1980), pp. 203-04.
18. Robert Dallek, Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign
Policy 1932-1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 31. See
also pp. 164-65.
19. Dispatch No. 349 of 20 September 1938 by Sir. R. Lindsay,
Documents on British Foreign Policy (ed. Ernest L. Woodward), Third
series, Vol. VII (London, 1954), pp. 627-29. See also: Joseph P. Lash,
Roosevelt and Churchill 1939-1941 (New York: Norton, 1976), pp. 25-27;
Dallek, pp. 164-65; Arnold A. Offner, America and the Ori-, gins of
World War II (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971), p. 61.
20. William Phillips, Ventures in Diplomacy (North Beverly, Mass.:
privately published, 1952), pp. 220-21.
21. Carl Burckhardt, Meine Danziger Mission 1937-1939 (Munich:
Callwey, 1960), p. 225.
22. Drew Pearson and Robert S. Allen, "Washington Daily
Merry-Go-Round," Washington Times-Herald, 14 April 1939, p. 16. A
facsimile reprint of this column appears in Conrad Grieb (ed.),
American Manifest Destiny and The Holocausts (New York: Examiner
Books, 1979), pp. 132-33. See also: Wirsing, pp. 238-41.
23. Jay P. Moffat, The Moffat Papers 1919-1943 (Cambridge: Harvard
University Press, 1956), p. 232.
24. U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United
States (Diplomatic Papers), 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956),
p. 122.
25. "Von Wiegand Says-," Chicago Herald-American, 8 October 1944,
p. 2.
26. Edvard Benes, Memoirs of Dr. Eduard Benes (London: George
Allen & Unwin, 1954), pp. 79-80.
27. Lash, p. 64.
28. Hamilton Fish, FDR: The Other Side of the Coin (Now York:
Vantage, 1976; Torrance, Calif.: Institute for Historical Review,
1980), p. 62.
29. James V. Forrestal (ads. Walter Millis and E.S. Duffield), The
Forrestal Diaries (New York: Viking, 1951), pp. 121-22. I have been
privately informed by a colleague who has examined the original
manuscript of the Forrestal diaries that many very critical references
to the Jews were deleted from the published version.
30. Jan Szembek, Journal 1933-1939 (Paris: Plan, 1952), pp.
475-76.
31. David E. Koskoff, Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times
(Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974), p. 207; Moffat, p. 253;
A.J.P. Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War (London: Hamish
Hamilton, 1961; 2nd ed. Greenwich, Conn.: Fawcett Premier [paperback],
1965), p. 262; U.S., Department of State, Foreign Relations of the
United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington: 1956), p. 355.
32. Dallek, p. 164.
33. Beschloss, pp. 190-91; Lash, p. 75; Koskoff, pp. 212-13.
34. Hull to Kennedy (No. 905), U.S., Department of State, Foreign
Relations of the United States, 1939, General, Vol. I (Washington:
1956), p. 424.
35. The radio addresses of Hamilton Fish quoted here were
published in the Congressional Record Appendix (Washington) as
follows: (6 January 1939) Vol. 84, Part 11, pp. 52-53; (5 March 1939)
same, pp. 846-47; (5 April 1939) Vol. 84, Part 12, pp. 1342-43; (21
April 1939) same, pp. 1642-43; (26 May 1939) Vol. 84, Part 13, pp.
2288-89; (8 July 1939) same, pp. 3127-28.
36. Wayne S. Cole, Charles A. Lindbergh and the Battle Against
American Intervention in World War II (New York: Harcourt Brace
Jovanovich, 1974), pp. 128, 136-39.
37. Congressional Record Appendix (Washington: 1941), (30 December
1940) Vol. 86, Part 18, pp. 7019-25. See also: Appendix, Vol. 86, Part
17, pp. 5808-14.
38. New York Times, 11 March 1941, p. 10.
39. Lucy Dawidowicz, "American Jews and the Holocaust," The New
York Times Magazine, 18 April 1982, p. 102.
40. "FDR 'had a Jewish great-grandmother'" Jewish Chronicle
(London), 5 February 1982, p. 3.
41. Charles A. Lindbergh, The Wartime Journals of Charles A.
Lindbergh (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1970), p. 481.
42. Koskoff, pp. 282, 212. The role of the American press in
fomenting hatred against Germany between 1933 and 1939 is a subject
that deserves much more detailed treatment. Charles Tansill provides
some useful information on this in Back Door to War. The essay by
Professor Hans A. Muenster, "Die Kriegsschuld der Presse der USA" in
Kriegsschuld und Presse, published in 1944 by the German
Reichsdozentenfuehrung, is worth consulting.
43. An excellent essay relating and contrasting American public
opinion measurements to Roosevelt's foreign policy moves in 1939-41 is
Harry Elmer Barnes, Was Roosevelt Pushed Into War By Popular Demand in
1941? (N.p.: privately printed, 1951). It is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
44. Lash, p. 240.
45. New York Times, 27 April 1941, p. 19.
46. Harry Elmer Barnes, The Struggle Against the Historical
Blackout, 2nd ed. (N.p.: privately published, ca. 1948), p. 12. See
also the 9th, final revised and enlarged edition (N.p.: privately
published, ca. 1954), p. 34; this booklet is reprinted in Barnes,
Selected Revisionist Pamphlets.
47. Harry Elmer Barnes, "Revisionism: A Key to Peace," Rampart
Journal of Individualist Thought Vol. II, No. 1 (Spring 1966), pp.
29-30. This article was republished in Barnes, Revisionism: A Key to
Peace and Other Essays (San Francisco: Cato Institute [Cato Paper No.
12], 1980).
48. Sven Hedin, Amerika im Kampf der Kontinente (Leipzig: F.A.
Brockhaus, 1943), p. 54.
Bibliography
Listed here are the published editions of the Polish documents, the
most important sources touching on the questions of their authenticity
and content, and essential recent sources on what President Roosevelt
was really-as opposed to publicly-doing and thinking during the
prelude to war. Full citations for all references in the article will
be found in the notes.
Beschloss, Michael R. Kennedy and Roosevelt. New York: Norton, 1980.
Bullitt, Orville H. (ed.). For the President: Personal and Secret.
[Correspondence between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt.]
Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972.
Germany. Foreign Office Archive Commission. Roosevelts Weg in den
Krieg: Geheimdokumente zur Kriegspolitik des Praesidenten der
Vereinigten Staaten. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag, 1943.
Germany. Foreign Office. The German White Paper. [White Book No. 3.]
New York: Howell, Soskin and Co., 1940.
Germany. Foreign Office. Polnische Dokumente zur Vorgeschichte des
Kriegs. [White Book No. 3.] Berlin: F. Eher, 1940.
Koskoff, David E. Joseph P. Kennedy: A Life and Times. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1974.
Lukasiewicz, Juliusz (Waclaw Jedrzejewicz, ed.). Diplomat in Paris
1936-1939. New York: Columbia University Press, 1970.
Wirsing, Giselher. Der masslose Kontinent: Roosevelts Kampf um die
Weltherrschaft. Jena: E. Diederichs, 1942.
Michael Ejercito
Jan 8, 2012, 1:04:26 PM1/8/12
to
For some people, it did not end.
A suspension of barbarity
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4096/a-suspension-of-barbarity
FIFTY YEARS AGO, they keep saying. Fifty years ago, Auschwitz was
liberated. Fifty years ago, the Nazis were defeated. Fifty years ago,
the survivors emerged from the ash and bones and hell of the death
camps. Fifty years ago, the world, sickened to discover how
unspeakably deep and black was the abyss into which one of the most
cultured nations on earth had systematically ground up 6 million Jews,
swore: Never again. Fifty years ago, the Holocaust ended.
Fifty years ago.
Ended?
In the Cleveland synagogue I grew up in, there was a woman named
Esther, a survivor of the camps. Over the years I watched her mind
slowly disassemble, pulled apart by memories too violent to endure.
She would burst into shouts during the rabbi's sermon and madly rush
to kiss the Torah scroll as it was carried to the ark. When charity
appeals were made from the pulpit, she would wave in the air, of all
things, Czechoslovak stamps, crying out that she had something of
great value to donate. I got hold of one of those stamps once and
looked it up in a catalog. It was worthless.
When, exactly, did the Holocaust end for Esther?
In the same synagogue was a man called B--, an envelope maker who had
no children and who we all somehow knew never would. What B-- lost in
the camps wasn't his life, but something even more precious: all hope
of giving life. During the war, he had been sterilized in one of Dr.
Mengele's sadistic experiments.
When did his Holocaust end?
When did my father's?
On May 7, 1945, the concentration camp at Ebensee, an Austrian town
between Linz and Salzburg, was abandoned by its Nazi guards. Among the
Jews not yet dead in that place was my father. He was 19 years old, he
weighed 65 pounds, and he was nearly gone with starvation and typhoid
fever. Thirteen months and three camps earlier, on his first day in
Auschwitz, he had seen his parents sent to the gas chamber, along with
his 10-year-old brother Yrvin and his little sister Alice, who was 8.
My father's teen-age brother Zoltan was murdered a few days later; his
older sister Franceska by the following spring.
When the Nazis fled Ebensee on that May morning 50 years ago, my
father was left with nothing but the rags he was wearing and a
greenish-blue tattoo on his arm: A-10502.
And feelings of guilt that have lasted for decades.
"I had dreams and nightmares about what happened," he said to me once.
"I always feel sort of guilty, even until now, about not protecting my
younger brother. I was with him together for a just a few hours; then
we were separated. I wonder -- could I have insisted that he stay with
me? I don't know. Coming from a farm, I was naive. I was not
sophisticated."
Between 1940 and 1945, it was a central aim of the German Reich to
exterminate every Jew in Europe -- to bring about, once and for all, a
"Final Solution" to the Jewish "problem." To carry out this policy,
which was given a higher priority than even the war effort, the Nazis
constructed a vast and elaborate machinery, employing tens of
thousands of people and requiring the most detailed and complicated
logistics. It was an industry whose raw material was Jews, which it
imported from lands as far-flung as Greece and Norway, and whose final
product was Jewish corpses, or the greasy smoke of Jewish corpses. To
ensure its success, the Nazis drew on all the resources of wealth,
science, engineering, transportation and manpower at their command.
And my father has felt guilty for 50 years because he didn't know how
to save his brother.
Has his Holocaust ended?
I mistrust this number, this 50. It seems too definitive a milestone,
too complete, too over-and-done-with. When I hear the words "ended 50
years ago," it seems to me I also hear: "Enough already." "Let it go."
"It's history."
Is it?
On an NPR broadcast two weeks ago, an articulate skinhead named Tracy
Gilson was asked why he has Hitler's face tattooed on his neck.
"The Holocaust," replied the young man, who became a skinhead at 13.
"You know what? If it did happen, good. I don't care. I'm glad. I
really -- that's good. That's great. Swell, good. Kill 6 million more,
somebody, please. . . . I wish somebody would do that here, freakin'
decide that they need to get rid of all the trash and start building
death camps. That would be fine with me."
The Holocaust didn't end 50 years ago; it was only suspended. What
separates us from 8-year-old girls gulping death in gas chambers is
nothing more than a thin veneer of civilization, stretched like a
bandage over a bleeding wound, capable of being stripped away in a
twinkling. Germany is the land of Bach and Durer and Goethe, after
all. Yet how readily it became the land of Buchenwald and crematoria
and pits filled with naked, machine-gunned Jews.
There is nothing so evil, so demonic, that people cannot be induced to
do it, or to look the other way while it is being done. Not only storm
troops and skinheads. Nice people. Cultured people. People like us.
Fifty years ago, the Holocaust was suspended. How long it stays
suspended depends on how long we remember to never forget. Fifty years
after the spring of 1945, when even those who survived are almost all
gone and wildflowers grow where dead parents and dead children were
once piled high, we need to remember more urgently than ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe).
Michael Ejercito
Jan 8, 2012, 1:02:08 PM1/8/12
to
On Jan 8, 9:19 am, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> By Mark Weber
>
> Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
> and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
> Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
> December 1941.
Much has been written by Mark Weber denying the Holocaust.
> By Mark Weber
>
> Much has already been written about Roosevelt's campaign of deception
> and outright lies in getting the United States to intervene in the
> Second World War prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in
> December 1941.
The following article explains your pathology.
History's oldest hatred
by Jeff Jacoby
The Boston Globe
http://www.jeffjacoby.com/4743/historys-oldest-hatred
ANTI-SEMITISM is an ancient derangement, the oldest of hatreds, so it
is strange that it lacks a more meaningful name. The misnomer "anti-
Semitism" -- a term coined in 1879 by the German agitator Wilhelm
Marr, who wanted a scientific-sounding euphemism for Judenhass, or Jew-
hatred -- is particularly inane, since hostility to Jews has never had
anything to do with Semites or being Semitic. (That is why those who
protest that Arabs cannot be anti-Semitic since "Arabs are Semites
too" speak either from ignorance or disingenuousness.)
Perhaps there is no good name for a virus as mutable and unyielding as
anti-Semitism. "The Jews have been objects of hatred in pagan,
religious, and secular societies," write Joseph Telushkin and Dennis
Prager in Why the Jews?, their classic study of anti-Semitism.
"Fascists have accused them of being Communists, and Communists have
branded them capitalists. Jews who live in non-Jewish societies have
been accused of having dual loyalties, while Jews who live in the
Jewish state have been condemned as 'racists.' Poor Jews are bullied,
and rich Jews are resented. Jews have been branded as both rootless
cosmopolitans and ethnic chauvinists. Jews who assimilate have been
called a 'fifth column,' while those who stay together spark hatred
for remaining separate."
So hardy is anti-Semitism, it can flourish without Jews. Shakespeare's
poisonous depiction of the Jewish moneylender Shylock was written for
audiences that had never seen a Jew, all Jews having been expelled
from England more than 300 years earlier. Anti-Semitic bigotry infests
Saudi Arabia, where Jews have not dwelt in at least five centuries;
its malignance is suggested by the government daily Al-Riyadh, which
published an essay claiming that Jews have a taste for "pastries mixed
with human blood."
Esther Confounding Haman (Engraving by Gustave Doré, 1875)
There was Jew-hatred before there was Christianity or Islam, before
Nazism or Communism, before Zionism or the Middle East conflict. This
week Jews celebrate the festival of Purim, gathering in synagogues to
read the biblical book of Esther. Set in ancient Persia, it tells of
Haman, a powerful royal adviser who is insulted when the Jewish sage
Mordechai refuses to bow down to him. Haman resolves to wipe out the
empire's Jews and makes the case for genocide in an appeal to the
king:
"There is a certain people scattered and dispersed among ... all the
provinces of your kingdom, and their laws are different from those of
other peoples, and the king's laws they do not keep, so it is of no
benefit for the king to tolerate them. If it please the king, let it
be written that they be destroyed." After winning royal assent, Haman
makes plans "to annihilate, to kill and destroy all the Jews, the
young and the elderly, children and women, in one day . . . and to
take their property for plunder."
What drives such bloodlust? Haman's indictment accuses the Jews of
lacking national loyalty, of insinuating themselves throughout the
empire, of flouting the king's law. But the Jews of Persia had done
nothing to justify Haman's murderous anti-Semitism -- just as Jews in
later ages did nothing that justified their persecution under the
Church or Islam, or their expulsion from so many lands in Europe and
the Middle East, or their repression at the hands of Russian czars and
Soviet commissars, or their slaughter by Nazi Germany. When the
president of Iran today calls for the extirpation of the Jewish state,
when a leader of Hamas vows to kill Jewish children around the world,
when firebombs are hurled at synagogues in London and Paris and
Chicago, it is not because Jews deserve to be victimized.
Some Jews are no saints, but the paranoid frenzy that is anti-Semitism
is not explained by what Jews do, but by what they are. The Jewish
people are the object of anti-Semitism, not its cause. That is why the
haters' rationales can be so wildly inconsistent and their agendas so
contradictory. What, after all, do those who vilify Jews as greedy
bankers have in common with those who revile them as seditious
Bolsheviks? Nothing, save an irrational obsession with Jews.
At one point in the book of Esther, Haman lets the mask slip. He
boasts to his friends and family of "the glory of his riches, and the
great number of his sons, and everything in which the king had
promoted him and elevated him." Still, he seethes with rage and
frustration: "Yet all this is worthless to me so long as I see
Mordechai the Jew sitting at the king's gate." That is the
unforgivable offense: "Mordechai the Jew" refuses to blend in, to
abandon his values, to be just like everyone else. He goes on sitting
there -- undigested, unassimilated, and for that reason unbearable.
Of course Haman had his ostensible reasons for targeting Jews. So did
Hitler and Arafat; so does Ahmadinejad. Sometimes the anti-Semite
focuses on the Jew's religion, sometimes on his laws and lifestyle,
sometimes on his national identity or his professional achievements.
Ultimately, however, it is the Jew's Jewishness, and the call to
higher standards that it represents, that the anti-Semite cannot
abide.
With all their flaws and failings, the Jewish people endure, their
role in history not yet finished. So the world's oldest hatred endures
too, as obsessive and indestructible -- and deadly -- as ever.
(Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe.)
Topaz
Jan 9, 2012, 9:43:56 PM1/9/12
to
Auschwitz: Myths and facts
by Mark Weber
Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime
concentration camp where many prisoners-most of them Jewish-were
reportedly exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is
widely regarded as the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The
camp's horrific reputation cannot, however, be reconciled with the
facts.
Scholars challenge Holocaust story
Astonishing as it may seem, more and more historians and engineers
have been challenging the widely accepted Auschwitz story. These
"revisionist" scholars do not dispute the fact that large numbers of
Jews were deported to the camp, or that many died there, particularly
of typhus and other diseases. But the compelling evidence they present
shows that Auschwitz was not an extermination center and that the
story of mass killings in "gas chambers" is a myth.
The Auschwitz camps
The Auschwitz camp complex was set up in 1940 in what is now
south-central Poland. Large numbers of Jews were deported there
between 1942 and mid-1944.
The main camp was known as Auschwitz I. Birkenau, or Auschwitz II, was
supposedly the main extermination center, and Monowitz, or Auschwitz
III, was a large industrial center where gasoline was produced from
coal. In addition there were dozens of smaller satellite camps devoted
to the war economy.
Four million victims?
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans
exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. This figure, which was
invented by the Soviets, was uncritically accepted for many years. It
often appeared in major American newspapers and magazines, for
example. (note 1)
Today no reputable historian, not even those who generally accept the
extermination story, believes this figure. Israeli Holocaust historian
Yehuda Bauer said in 1989 that it is time to finally acknowledge the
familiar four million figure is a deliberate myth. In July 1990 the
Auschwitz State Museum in Poland, along with Israel's Yad Vashem
Holocaust Center, suddenly announced that altogether perhaps one
million people (both Jews and non-Jews) died there. Neither
institution would say how many of these people were killed, nor were
any estimates given of the numbers of those supposedly gassed. (note
2) One prominent Holocaust historian, Gerald Reitlinger, has estimated
that perhaps 700,000 or so Jews perished at Auschwitz. More recently,
Holocaust historian Jean-Claude Pressac has estimated that about
800,000 persons-of whom 630,000 were Jewish-perished at Auschwitz.
While even such lower figures are incorrect, they show how the
Auschwitz story has changed drastically over the years. (note 3)
Bizarre tales
At one time it was seriously claimed that Jews were systematically
electrocuted at Auschwitz. American newspapers, citing a Soviet
eyewitness report from liberated Auschwitz, told readers in February
1945 that the methodical Germans had killed Jews there using an
"electric conveyor belt on which hundreds of persons could be
electrocuted simultaneously [and] then moved on into furnaces. They
were burned almost instantly, producing fertilizer for nearby cabbage
fields." (note 4)
And at the Nuremberg Tribunal, chief U.S. prosecutor Robert Jackson
charged that the Germans used a "newly invented" device to
instantaneously "vaporize" 20,000 Jews near Auschwitz "in such a way
that there was no trace left of them." (note 5) No reputable historian
now accepts either of these fanciful tales.
The Höss 'confession'
A key Holocaust document is the "confession" of former Auschwitz
commandant Rudolf Höss of April 5, 1946, which was submitted by the
U.S. prosecution at the main Nuremberg trial. (note 6)
Although it is still widely cited as solid proof for the Auschwitz
extermination story, it is actually a false statement that was
obtained by torture.
Many years after the war, British military intelligence sergeant
Bernard Clarke described how he and five other British soldiers
tortured the former commandant to obtain his "confession." Höss
himself privately explained his ordeal in these words: "Certainly, I
signed a statement that I killed two and half million Jews. I could
just as well have said that it was five million Jews. There are
certain methods by which any confession can be obtained, whether it is
true or not." (note 7)
Even historians who generally accept the Holocaust extermination story
now acknowledge that many of the specific statements made in the Höss
"affidavit" are simply not true. For one thing, no serious scholar now
claims that anything like two and a half or three million people
perished in Auschwitz.
The Höss "affidavit" further alleges that Jews were already being
exterminated by gas in the summer of 1941 at three other camps:
Belzec, Treblinka and Wolzek. The "Wolzek" camp mentioned by Höss is a
total invention. No such camp existed, and the name is no longer
mentioned in Holocaust literature. Moreover, the story these days by
those who believe in the Holocaust legend is that gassings of Jews did
not begin at Auschwitz, Treblinka, or Belzec until sometime in 1942.
No documentary evidence
Many thousands of secret German documents dealing with Auschwitz were
confiscated after the war by the Allies. Not a single one refers to a
policy or program of extermination. In fact, the extermination story
cannot be reconciled with the documentary evidence.
Many Jewish inmates unable to work
For example, it is often claimed that all Jews at Auschwitz who were
unable to work were immediately killed. Jews who were too old, young,
sick, or weak were supposedly gassed on arrival, and only those who
could be worked to death were temporarily kept alive.
But the evidence shows that, in fact, a very high percentage of the
Jewish inmates were not able to work, and were nevertheless not
killed. For example, an internal German telex message dated Sept. 4,
1943, from the chief of the Labor Allocation department of the SS
Economic and Administrative Main Office (WVHA), reported that of
25,000 Jewish inmates in Auschwitz, only 3,581 were able to work, and
that all of the remaining Jewish inmates-some 21,500, or about 86
percent-were unable to work. (note 8)
This is also confirmed in a secret report dated April 5, 1944, on
"security measures in Auschwitz" by Oswald Pohl, head of the SS
concentration camp system, to SS chief Heinrich Himmler. Pohl reported
that there was a total of 67,000 inmates in the entire Auschwitz camp
complex, of whom 18,000 were hospitalized or disabled. In the
Auschwitz II camp (Birkenau), supposedly the main extermination
center, there were 36,000 inmates, mostly female, of whom
"approximately 15,000 are unable to work." (note 9)
These two documents simply cannot be reconciled with the Auschwitz
extermination story.
The evidence shows that Auschwitz-Birkenau was established primarily
as a camp for Jews who were not able to work, including the sick and
elderly, as well as for those who were temporarily awaiting assignment
to other camps. That's the considered view of Dr. Arthur Butz of
Northwestern University, who also says that this was the reason for
the unusually high death rate there. (note 10)
Princeton University history professor Arno Mayer, who is Jewish,
acknowledges in a recent book about the "final solution" that more
Jews perished at Auschwitz as a result of typhus and other "natural"
causes than were executed. (note 11)
Anne Frank
Perhaps the best known Auschwitz inmate was Anne Frank, who is known
around the world for her famous diary. But few people know that
thousands of Jews, including Anne and her father, Otto Frank,
"survived" Auschwitz.
The 15-year-old girl and her father were deported from the Netherlands
to Auschwitz in September 1944. Several weeks later, in the face of
the advancing Soviet army, Anne was evacuated along with many other
Jews to the Bergen-Belsen camp, where she died of typhus in March
1945.
Her father came down with typhus in Auschwitz and was sent to the camp
hospital to recover. He was one of thousands of sick and feeble Jews
who were left behind when the Germans abandoned the camp in January
1945, shortly before it was overrun by the Soviets. He died in
Switzerland in 1980.
If the German policy had been to kill Anne Frank and her father, they
would not have survived Auschwitz. Their fate, tragic though it was,
cannot be reconciled with the extermination story.
Allied propaganda
The Auschwitz gassing story is based in large part on the hearsay
statements of former Jewish inmates who did not personally see any
evidence of extermination. Their beliefs are understandable, because
rumors about gassings at Auschwitz were widespread.
Allied planes dropped large numbers of LEAFLETS , written in Polish
and German, on Auschwitz and the surrounding areas which claimed that
people were being gassed in the camp. The Auschwitz gassing story,
which was an important part of the Allied wartime propaganda effort,
was also broadcast to Europe by Allied radio stations. (note 12)
Survivor testimony
Former inmates have confirmed that they saw no evidence of
extermination at Auschwitz.
An Austrian woman, Maria Vanherwaarden, testified about her camp
experiences in a Toronto District Court in March 1988. She was
interned in Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1942 for having sexual relations
with a Polish forced laborer. On the train trip to the camp, a Gypsy
woman told her and the others that they would all be gassed at
Auschwitz.
Upon arrival, Maria and the other women were ordered to undress and go
into a large concrete room without windows to take a shower. The
terrified women were sure that they were about to die. But then,
instead of gas, water came out of the shower heads.
Auschwitz was no vacation center, Maria confirmed. She witnessed the
death of many fellow inmates by disease, particularly typhus, and
quite a few committed suicide. But she saw no evidence at all of mass
killings, gassings, or of any extermination program. (note 13)
A Jewish woman named Marika Frank arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau from
Hungary in July 1944, when 25,000 Jews were supposedly gassed and
cremated daily. She likewise testified after the war that she heard
and saw nothing of "gas chambers" during the time she was interned
there. She heard the gassing stories only later. (note 14)
Inmates released
Auschwitz internees who had served their sentences were released and
returned to their home countries. If Auschwitz had actually been a top
secret extermination center, the Germans would certainly not have
released inmates who "knew" what was happening in the camp. (note 15)
Himmler orders death rate reduced
In response to the deaths of many inmates due to disease, especially
typhus, the German authorities responsible for the camps ordered firm
counter-measures.
The head of the SS camp administration office sent a directive dated
Dec. 28, 1942, to Auschwitz and the other concentration camps. It
sharply criticized the high death rate of inmates due to disease, and
ordered that "camp physicians must use all means at their disposal to
significantly reduce the death rate in the various camps."
Furthermore, it ordered:
The camp doctors must supervise more often than in the past the
nutrition of the prisoners and, in cooperation with the
administration, submit improvement recommendations to the camp
commandants . . . The camp doctors are to see to it that the working
conditions at the various labor places are improved as much as
possible.
Finally, the directive stressed that "the Reichsfhrer SS [Heinrich
Himmler] has ordered that the death rate absolutely must be reduced."
(note 16)
German camp regulations
Official German camp regulations make clear that Auschwitz was not an
extermination center. They ordered: (note 17)
New arrivals in the camp are to be given a thorough medical
examination, and if there is any doubt [about their health], they must
be sent to quarantine for observation.
Prisoners who report sick must be examined that same day by the camp
physician. If necessary, the physician must transfer the prisoners to
a hospital for professional treatment.
The camp physician must regularly inspect the kitchen regarding the
preparation of the food and the quality of the food supply. Any
deficiencies that may arise must be reported to the camp commandant.
Special care should be given in the treatment of accidents, in order
not to impair the full productivity of the prisoners.
Prisoners who are to be released or transfered must first be brought
before the camp physician for medical examination.
Telltale aerial photos
Detailed aerial reconnaissance photographs taken of Auschwitz-Birkenau
on several random days in 1944 (during the height of the alleged
extermination period there) were made public by the CIA in 1979. These
photos show no trace of piles of corpses, smoking crematory chimneys
or masses of Jews awaiting death, things that have been repeatedly
alleged, and all of which would have been clearly visible if Auschwitz
had been the extermination center it is said to have been. (note 18)
Absurd cremation claims
Cremation specialists have confirmed that thousands of corpses could
not possibly have been cremated every day throughout the spring and
summer of 1944 at Auschwitz, as commonly alleged.
For example, Mr. Ivan Lagace, manager of a large crematory in Calgary,
Canada, testified in court in April 1988 that the Auschwitz cremation
story is technically impossible. The allegation that 10,000 or even
20,000 corpses were burned every day at Auschwitz in the summer of
1944 in crematories and open pits is simply "preposterous" and "beyond
the realm of reality," he declared under oath. (note 19)
Gassing expert refutes extermination story
America's leading gas chamber expert, Boston engineer Fred A.
Leuchter, carefully examined the supposed "gas chambers" in Poland and
concluded that the Auschwitz gassing story is absurd and technically
impossible.
Leuchter is the foremost specialist on the design and installation of
gas chambers used in the United States to execute convicted criminals.
For example, he designed a gas chamber facility for the Missouri state
penitentiary.
In February 1988 he carried out a detailed onsite examination of the
"gas chambers" at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek in Poland, which
are either still standing or only partially in ruins. In sworn
testimony to a Toronto court and in a technical report, Leuchter
described every aspect of his investigation.
He concluded by emphatically declaring that the alleged gassing
facilities could not possibly have been used to kill people. Among
other things, he pointed out that the so-called "gas chambers" were
not properly sealed or vented to kill human beings without also
killing German camp personnel. (note 20)
Dr. William B. Lindsey, a research chemist employed for 33 years by
the Dupont Corporation, likewise testified in a 1985 court case that
the Auschwitz gassing story is technically impossible. Based on a
careful on-site examination of the "gas chambers" at Auschwitz,
Birkenau and Majdanek, and on his years of experience, he declared: "I
have come to the conclusion that no one was willfully or purposefully
killed with Zyklon B [hydrocyanic acid gas] in this manner. I consider
it absolutely impossible." (note 21)
Topaz
Jan 9, 2012, 9:43:10 PM1/9/12
to
By Patrick Grimm
We hear daily of the alleged dangers of "Holocaust denial." We read in
newspapers the frightful scare-mongering, comparing those who deny
"global warming" to "Holocaust deniers." But I purport that there is
one form of denial truly more deadly to the survival of all nations
than any other. It is "Jew-denial."
Now you might say, no one denies that Jews exist, that they live among
us and have done quite well economically, sometimes honestly and other
times dishonestly. This is not what I refer to. "Jew-denial" or a
"Jew-denier" is a person, either uninformed or collusive with the
overclass, who denies the power of Jews in America and the world,
denies that their organized power has been corrosive (and many honest
Jews will admit that it is) and denies that Jews are a racial group
(their own words) who believe in their right to rule over the Goyim
(which means cattle). To deny all these things is only to ignore the
words of Jewish leaders and the words of the Jews' own holy books, the
Torah and the Talmud. It is also to jettison mountains of evidence and
decades of Jewish political activism.
But the Jew-deniers are everywhere, a ubiquitous dullard or deceptive
or deceived (take your pick) band of human beings. The Jew-deniers are
in our churches, in our governments, in our schools, in our military,
in our White House and in some of our own houses. Now I don't believe
these people should be jailed, imprisoned or fined for swallowing
false news or abetting the genocide the Jews are working to bring upon
us all, whites and Palestinians alike (the white is the Palestinian of
the European sphere), but they should be approached with caution,
mainly because a lifetime of brainwashing and hornswoggling can elicit
an animalistic reaction when one of these Jew-deniers is smacked in
the face with the truth.
The Jew-deniers (at least the lay ones) should be pitied rather than
stigmatized, though I do exactly that with this article and I deeply
apologize for that. But in all seriousness, they need help. They are
not mentally ill as the Jews call any person who disagrees with their
steamrolling of humanity. The Jew-deniers are misinformed and in need
of rescuing from a life of reckless disinfo which the media Jews will
be glad to force-feed them on a daily basis forever and ever if they
are willing to read the Jew newspapers and watch inane Jew newscasts
with reporters who are front men and front women for Big Jewry. These
types of medium masteries only perpetuate Jew-denial and breed more
little Jew-deniers, persons for whom the thought that Jewry could
desire anything but beneficence and ennoblement toward the Gentile
herds is a "canard" or a "libel", either bloody or bloodless, or an
"anti-Semitic" screed.
Present facts, statistics, troubling Israeli massacres, Talmudic
quotes, lists of ultra-liberal Jewish wheelers and dealers,
anti-Christian political action committees, discombobulating
historical accounts that show Jews as they are rather than as how they
dress themselves up for the camera, and a Jew-denier and those who are
card-carrying members of the Jew-denial movement that numbers in the
millions upon millions will spit out one or more replies taken from a
prepared list of oodles of Pavlovian conditioned retorts. For the sake
of brevity, here are just a select few:
1.You're an anti-Semite!
This one is easy to combat because most Jews are not Semites and many
non-Jews are. Most Jews are Khazars, Ashkenazi Khazars, so this
characterization (anti-Semite) is a real living, breathing canard.
Inform the Jew-denier of this reality and recommend Arthur Koestler's
book The Thirteenth Tribe for his/her perusal. Some Jew-deniers are
smart, while others don't read anything more intellectual than Harry
Potter novels. If this is the case, a sympathetic and platonic hug may
be in order.
2 Jews are "God's Chosen People"
If the Jew-denier is someone who believes in God, ask the Jew-denier
if God is indeed a racist of the crudest sort (though this is not to
say that racism defensively and properly understood is always a
negative). If the reply is a reflexive egalitarian 'no', and it will
be if this person goes to any Zionized, Judaized church in this
country, then ask the person if he/she honestly believes that God
would have sanctioned the killing of thousands upon thousands of
innocent human beings only for the purpose of having the Jews procure
their property, vineyards, wives, concubines, etc. Either God is a
genocidal maniac or the stories of the Old Testament are
Judahite-penned justifications of mass murder. It's one or the other.
This is not going to wash as an argument if you are talking to a
biblical literalist or one of those folks who believes that all
Scripture is "God-breathed" and "inerrant." If the Jew-denier
regularly sends financial love gifts to television evangelists, then
quietly walk away after shaking the dust from your Reeboks.
3. Jews are just members of one of the world's monotheistic religions
Jews identify themselves as a "race", a "master race" superior to all
other races and destined to enslave the world. Jews consider
themselves a race, first and foremost. One helpful quote is in order:
"The former Israeli Prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to
Jewish group in southern California said: 'If Israel had not come into
existence after World War II then I am certain the Jewish race
wouldn't have survived. I stand before you and say you must strengthen
your commitment to Israel.'" [1]
Judaism is a racial religion based on blood purity and conquest of the
Gentile as ordered by their holy books. This is not conspiracy theory.
This is basic Old Testament hermeneutics. I won't list all the verses
here where God tells the "Chosen People" that they are destined to
rule the world, but you can find them in your family Bible in books
like Deuteronomy and Numbers and present them to any Jew-deniers you
happen to run into.
CONCLUSION
Friends and countrymen, Jew-denial is an epidemic sweeping the world,
especially the American portion of it. Our churches are cranking out
little Judaized clones right off the conveyor Bible belt, ready to
parrot the words of Cyrus Scofield and John Hagee. Our governments are
rife with Judeophilic politicians scared to speak out about the Jewish
hijacking of our foreign policy. They attack those like Jim Moran,
even projecting Protocols of Zion conspiracies onto his temperate and
reasonable critiques of AIPAC and the Israel-First-Last-And-Always
Lobby. The Jew-denial movement is running wild in the United States!
It is ignoring the real issues, which are Jewish dual loyalty or
Israel-only loyalty, the Jewish machinations manipulating our currency
and economy and the debauching of our culture and the shattering of
our borders by galvanized Jews drunk and delirious with political
power and ruinous regency.
Should we prosecute the Jew-deniers, persecute the Jew-denial movement
on the internet, lock up its sycophants, lackeys and philo-Semitic
toadies and batter these simpletons in the streets with steel pipes
and tire irons? No, there's no use emulating the Jews.
We can only curb or put the kibosh on the Jew-denial movement by
spreading data far and wide on the web and to anyone who will listen
to the straight skinny on Jew supremacism and traitorous Jew antics.
The Jew-denial campaign has done quite a bang-up job deceiving and
misdirecting the energies of ordinary individuals (acolytes of
Jew-deniery) away from their true enemy and their greatest threat,
Jewish extremism and onto bogeymen like supposed white supremacists
and radical Islamists. Because of the popular front and font of lies
and anti-white disempowerment, most people are unaware or too
apathetic to even notice the Big Jewry Hidden Hand pouring our
liberties and our freedoms straight down the Talmudic drain.
To paraphrase the son of a rabbi and the creator of Communism, Karl
Marx "Jew-recognizers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose
but your high interest rates!"
[1] (Daily Pilot, Newport Beach/ Costa Mesa, Feb. 28, 2000, front
page)
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages