February 2, 2004
We are proud to announce that TrueCrypt 1.0 has been released today.
To our best knowledge, it is currently the only free open-source
on-the-fly encryption software capable of encrypting partitions
larger than 2 GB under Windows XP/2000. On Windows XP/2000, it is
also the only open-source on-the-fly encryption system that offers
plausible deniability. It can either encrypt entire partitions or
devices, or it can create virtual encrypted disks within files.
TrueCrypt is based on (and might be considered a sequel to) a
discontinued product called Encryption for the Masses (E4M) by Paul
Le Roux. The differences between E4M and TrueCrypt include plausible
deniability, Windows XP support, significant increase in the volume
size limit, improved sector scrambling algorithm and many more.
For more information, please visit www.truecrypt.org
"TrueCrypt Team" <tmp...@truecrypt.org> wrote in message
news:2712cd2944b77868...@news.teranews.com...
LOL.
Eat your heart out Shaun "The Whiny Weiner" Hollingsworth.
You can stick your DriveCrypt up your ass for good now.
Now might be a good time to jump ship. SecurStar's future doesn't look good
at all now.
Hahaha............
LOL.
>
> TrueCrypt 1.0 Released
>
> February 2, 2004
>
> We are proud to announce that TrueCrypt 1.0 has been released today.
Congratulations on the release!
For those that are interested, I should have a Delphi component to
interface with the TrueCrypt driver SecureTrayUtil fairly soon now,
together with SecureTrayUtil support for this new package.
>
>LOL.
>
>Eat your heart out Shaun "The Whiny Weiner" Hollingsworth.
>You can stick your DriveCrypt up your ass for good now.
>
>Now might be a good time to jump ship. SecurStar's future doesn't look good
>at all now.
>Hahaha............
>
And they said I was going mad..... I can just about see this guy in
his straight jacket.......
I wonder if he's posting from his local looney bin ?
Regards,
Shaun.
>Shaun.
>
Flush boring post!
>Shaun.
>
STFU. FOAD asshole/moron/fukkhead!
<sigh>
Are you still here?
I thought you'd gone and weren't coming back?
Bloody Liar!
N.B. Come back to moan some more have we?
Don't bother, TrueCrypt has accomplished more in VERSION 1 than DriveCrypt
hasn't even been able to do by VERSION 4.
>Shaun.
>
Flush boring post!
>Shaun.
>
STFU. FOAD asshole/moron/fukkhead!
>Shaun.
>
Flush boring post!
>Shaun.
>
STFU. FOAD asshole/moron/fukkhead!
>Shaun.
>
Flush boring post!
>Shaun.
>
STFU. FOAD asshole/moron/fukkhead!
<sigh>
>Shaun.
>
STFU. FOAD asshole/moron/fukkhead!
Keith R Kilby wrote:
>Would be nice to test but server down!
Try again. I tested it when I first read this message (hm, last night I
think it was) and again now. No problem. Either you stumbled into a
temporary problem or the fault is somewhere with your connection not
theirs.
- --
Frode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQB9+YOXlGBWTt1afEQIV1gCgz0fLp+h3PqPGtL4tEMxB4kPGHEoAnRfW
4VUN891Ir5uf/MnQtFV+PkIw
=6LdS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Keith
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Keith R Kilby wrote:
>>Would be nice to test but server down!
>
>Try again. I tested it when I first read this message (hm, last night I
>think it was) and again now. No problem. Either you stumbled into a
>temporary problem or the fault is somewhere with your connection not
>theirs.
FWIW, when I try and access the link via Anonymizer's SSH tunnel, I
get a 'Host not Found' error so I suspect it's something to do with
your connection.
I just d/l version 1.0a with no problem so can confirm it is there and
working.
Keith R Kilby wrote:
>Tested but still the same no dns resolution on the name have you got
>their IP?
Name: www.truecrypt.org
Address: 65.161.144.72
However a http://65.161.144.72 didn't do much for me apart from giving me a
404. It probably needs the access to be for the hostname as opposed to IP I
suspect. Maybe you have better luck if you add it to your hosts file and
then use the hostname.
- --
Frode
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQB+dk+XlGBWTt1afEQIkKACgtoyJkTvm+s2TZTTv4SazgCB9980AnjJl
41QQ00ouTk33hw3p3mPgqeyM
=yVAx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
It looks as if I am having problems with DNS, the namservers I am using
cannot resolve the URL to an IP address. If it is a propagation problem
then the record may come up in 48hrs. Until then I am stuffed unless
anyone can give me Truecrypt's IP address.
Hoping for help
Regards
Keith
"To email:- remove the obvious and the full stops before @"
Lost in Web space. Google search for Web: no page with truecrypt or
truecrypt.org
"howamidifferent" <howamid...@mail.anonymizer.com> wrote in message
news:401e6e28$0$138$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
>> For more information, please visit www.truecrypt.org
>
> Lost in Web space. Google search for Web: no page with truecrypt or
> truecrypt.org
New sites do not show on google that fast (sometimes it can even take a
month before a new site shows up).
Thanks for the IP and I get the same error 404 but doing are reverse
lookup on the IP I get net-144-72.microworld.com/ so I suspect the site
is hosted and there are some problems with the DNS and the hosting.
Thanks anyway for your help and I'll keep trying the address and from
another site as well.
Regards
Keith
Curious, but numerous entries in the "Groups" section:
alt.security.scramdisk Date :2004-02-02 15:27:03 PST
"Crabbit" <otk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ugtq6s0igki8dneij...@4ax.com...
> i managed to contact the truecrypt site yesterday [monday gmt] but
> today i cannot [either by ip or url]. strange. some kind of trick to
> get people to download a trojan?
"Crabbit" <otk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<4mfv101bsq9h554g1...@4ax.com>...
> still getting domain name not found from BT dns
>
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2004 15:21:58 GMT, "howamidifferent"