I consider myself first of all a sculptor and only by chance a ceramic
sculpture - because it was available to me - like any molder living
near a clay bank. But my vision is three-dimensional primarily and the
object in space engages me more than its finish. Even though it must be
considered, obviously. One of my best statues had lain in broken pieces
for some years after a careless firing in a commercial kiln. Eventually
I put it together with concrete and epoxy glues. To conceal the patchy
construction I used synthetic whitewash, of a pale green color. I
believe that it is now an impressive statue. Any Glaze artist would
have told me to write it off and start again to have something
complete. But then the original vitality would have disappeared
forever.
I explained that burnishing is beautiful but results in a fragile body.
I usually use engobes, applied before the bisque firing. But even when
the coloring is completely successful later accidents may necessitate
non-ceramic additions. Andrew looks down upon shoe waxes. But they are
far more delicate than vitreous glazes. They have a glowing
transparency like watercolor, so that the original clay body shines
through. Diluted inks will not have a shine. One recent experiment was
to have a diluted acrylic paint in a light color over another one that
was darker. The result was an effect for skin as if from the 14th
century.
Glaze Art would seem to complete Ceramic Art. But I contend that it is
its own entity. Also that no kind of "purism" should prevent the
Ceramic Artist from completing his vision, as he or she may.
Florence Amit, Beer Sheba
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.