Does anyone know about the true origins of cold cast bronze? I think I
read about Rodin using Bronze powders with plaster, but does anyone
know where or who the first one came from?
Thanks in advance,
Will
Will --
I don't know, but I'd like to ask everyone if the name cold cast bronze
leaves them cold? Personally, since it's not really bronze, I'd prefer that
sculptors use a name like faux bronze or something to that effect....
Well?
-- Gary Oblock
--
Bronze Dreams
Santa Clara, CA
http://www.bronzedreams.com
-------------- ad for the hosting service I use ---------------
Free Web Hosting with Domain Registration or transfer
http://freewebhosting.catalog.com/jump/mw...@earthlink.net
Gary Oblock wrote:
>
>
> Will --
>
> I don't know, but I'd like to ask everyone if the name cold cast bronze
> leaves them cold? Personally, since it's not really bronze, I'd prefer that
> sculptors use a name like faux bronze or something to that effect....
>
> Well?
>
> -- Gary Oblock
>
> --
> Bronze Dreams
> Santa Clara, CA
> http://www.bronzedreams.com
> -------------- ad for the hosting service I use ---------------
> Free Web Hosting with Domain Registration or transfer
> http://freewebhosting.catalog.com/jump/mw...@earthlink.net
>
>
>
--
Billy Hiebert (510)654-7488
HIEBERT SCULPTURE WORKS
http://www.hieberts.com
Billy --
How about something a little more honest to buyer like "powdered bronze and glue?"
If you can't take a propane touch to it and apply a patina then the words cast bronze
in the phrase "cold cast bronze" are a bit deceptive.
-- Gary
The problem may be twofold. One it is trying to pass off " powdered
bronze in resin" as real bronze. Ebay is considering making sellers
CLEARLY describe the distinction, I guess the problem is that pervasive.
The other problem is it is essentially that plastic/resin.... Not really
from nature.
Glass, marble, metal, wood, - Natural, for the most part. ( I realize bronze
doesn't occur in nature, blah blah, but you get my point.)
Plastic, Resin, - not occurring naturally in nature for the most part, very
synthetic.
I guess if it's clear what you are buying it is okay. I would not cast my
work in it though, not for sale anyway. I have played around with Bondo and
cast some pieces, painted with paint to look like bronze. But I wouldn't
sell them. That's just me though.
But don't cast anything other than giftware in it.%0
Natural materials are classier in my opinion and to most of the general
population, I suppose. This is reflected by price and terminology.
Hence the Natural terms: " all natural wood" , "mahogany", " oak" " Marble"
, " Bronze" , " Gold", " Silver" " Ivory" etc.
Versus: " particle board " " oak type finish" " cast stone" " Bonded
bronze" " Electroplated" , " French Ivory" " plastic" etc. ( side note, I
don't and wouldn't own most types of Ivory)
I think there is also something nice in Bronze that it will outlast me, even
if in a fire, unless it melts. I mean 3000 years from now it's still
around. Based on what I have seen with resins, I don't think 3000 years
from now it will be around.
Conceivably any type of material can be used for sculpture that will
function. I just think that using resin, which translates to me as plastic
is not doing justice to your work. Your work would be so much nicer in
bronze or even aluminum given the ' space age , scientific, funky' look of
your work.
Imagine a nice alternating bronze and Verde patina on some of your pieces,,
very nice.
Even lead would be neat. Lead can conceivable be cast in a silicone mold,
so I am told anyway. I think silicone is good for up to 600 degrees. Lead
melts at about the same.
Lead tire weights, often free from tire shops..........
Regards,
Henri
Henri --
Oak is also much more durable that particle board. The same comparison
could be made between lost wax cast bronze and bronze powder with glue.
-- Gary
That sounds reasonable but not everyone is as ethical as you.
About your second point have you noticed that resin sculpture is
being accepted in major art shows? I've seen some of it NSS shows
and I find it appalling.
-- Gary
Lucite actually looks pretty good....
However, I think what you are responding to is the use of resin to FAKE
another medium...
Why try and make resin look like bronze? Because its cheaper... Its a
form of hoodwinking.... if you want it to look like bronze, make it out
of bronze.....
I think its fine to use resins as long as you are using resins BECAUSE
of the qualities the resin has that other media do not...translucency,
flexibility, woven reinforcing material embedded within....
I thinks its a matter of using the media in an aesthetic way that
capitalizes on the unique appearances or structural properties of
resins.
But it has to be done in a way that looks good.
christopher
Christopher --
Acrylic (PMMA) is a tough and durable material that is, in the right hands, quite
elegant. On the other hand your typical resin does not even come close to PMMA's
mechanical, chemical or esthetic qualities. In addition 99% of the time it masquerades
as something its not which taints it in my mind. I think plaster is much better suited
for fine art than resin.
Christopher, these are just my silly personal opinions/prejudices and I hope you don't
take them too seriously.
Yeah- I don't see resin used well hardly at all... But again- I think
what offends is the way people try to pretend its not resin- that its
Faux porcelain- or faux bronze....
You can do somethings with resin that no other material can really do-
that's what to use it for...
christopher
Steve L.
<Huntleys...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1114995619.6...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Will --
I didn't take any offense when you used the term. But, I guess you now know
the feelings some of us on alt.sculpture have about the that name. ;-)
Since, its basically resin mixed with powdered bronze it must be newer than
the resin itself. Find when suitable resins became generally availability and
you've probably got the date you want.
History, eh.... well here's what little I know about it.
Real cold cast bronze was a mixture of actual Powdered Bronze and
polyester resin. It first started appearing in the mid sixties, but
really took off in the 70s as the casting resins began to improve.
I remember my first experiments with it- ordering a 50 lb can of
powdered bronze and being surprised by the TINY can they sent me. (
of course, bronze is really heavy- I guess I figured the powdered type
would be, i don't know, fluffier?)
There were two big problems with cold cast bronze- one was settling.
The bronze is so heavy that it settles to the bottom of the mold before
the resin can gel. Too much bronze and it can actually squeeze so
much resin out of the bottom of the mold that there isn't enough left
to act as a matrix fro the bronze powder.
The other problem was the color- the castings came out looking like
chocolate bunnies. You had to buff the heck out of them to bring out
the bronze color, but then they would slowly turn back to chocolate no
matter what you did to seal them. The chocolate color literally oozed
out from around the individual grains of bronze.
For any full depth figure, there would be noticable 'banding' of color,
say, in an outstretched arm, where the top pf the arm, which was down
during casting, would be bright bronze and the underside of the arm
have not enough bronze to get any buffed shine on it.
For these reasons, cold cast bronze looked best when used to cast
reliefs (all bottom of the mold) and when rotationally molded- that is-
keep the resin mixing the whole time it is liquid to keep the bronze in
suspension.
Another trick was to wash the frshly buffed surface with muriatic acid
to create a verdigris patina that held up better.
(used this on a set of coldcast relief panels we made for the doors of
the statuary I apprenticed at- actually had some guys pry the panels
off in the dark of night thinking they could sell the 'bronze' for
scrap)
By the early 80s you started to see cold cast bronze without any bronze
at all- they started using the COLORED aluminum powders available for
metalflake paints.
The idea being that a bronze colored aluminum would stay in suspension
better, and not have the bad chocolate ooze problem.
Well- the bronze colored aluminums worked much better at giving a
unifrom bronze color to the surface- but they are not actually bronze-
so calling them cold cast brinze is really misleading.
And, you can also electroplate a resin casting with brass or copper or
both by painting the surface with an electrolyte and using a standard
wet plating process.
Another technique that has been used is vapor deposition- which is a
dry process- where copper or brass is vaporised in a vacuum chamber and
electrostatically deposited on the surface of a resin casting. This
can give a mirror smooth surface of pure metal, albeit only a few
hundred molucules thick.
Both of these surface treatments have been called cold cast bronze-
even though they are not cast.
More recenlty, the 90s saw a big improvement in cold casting technique
that used a thicker liquid resin to help real bronze stay in
suspension, coupled with a rotational technique in casting to keep the
material well agitated. ( rotation can be as simple as rolling a mold
around on a table by hand)
The 90s also saw the emergence of several methods of surfacing a resin
casting with a powdered bronze in a urethane coating. Like painting
the surface with bronze.
The urethane clearcoats used actually seal the bronze better than poly
resin and better avoid the chocolate bunnie effect.-
christopher
However, one thing I would consider is "cement fondu" for certain
sculptures,
which is a way of casting cement.
It gives an impression of concrete or stone depending on the mix you make
up.
--
CatherinA Laugel
Sculptor
www.catlaugel.com
__________________________________________________
"Sometimes it takes a long time to play like myself." Miles Davis
"Henri" <hank...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:lxtce.104$QR1...@fe04.lga...
----------
In article <428fdebc$0$26114$ed26...@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, "Cat"
----------
In article <428fdebc$0$26114$ed26...@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>, "Cat"
<c...@laugel.plus.com> wrote:
Gary
"Dan S" <arch...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:%eU%e.5659$zQ3...@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Gary
"Dan S" <arch...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:NnA0f.6888$oc....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
----------
Gary
"Dan S" <arch...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:w%w2f.9174$oc....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
Canada is/was a major copper producing country. They found with those
pesky health and safety laws, it was much cheaper to licence their
technology to countries like Chile, China etc. The safety and
environmental conditions are appalling. I have seen pictures of workers
in Chile working over sulphur vats, on wooden planks, with bandannas as
ventilation - one slip - molten sulphur. The true Gates of Hell.
Everything owned by multinational corporations and (often corrupt)
national cartels.
I don't know what these corporations are thinking. Maybe turn the
potential competition into a toxic waste dump, and then sell your stash
at a premium - meeting all safety and environmental concerns? This seems
to be the only logical explanation. The industries moving "offshore" are
increasing daily. This is why we need a global solution holding
international corporations responsible for their decisions.
So the short answer is that you are both right - copper/bronze/brass/tin
IS cheap - buts its TRUE cost is vastly undervalued from a global and
environmental perspective.
Gary in Vancouver
Gary R.
"Gary Waller" <ga...@digitalstoneworks.com> wrote in message
news:pzh3f.173197$tl2.96404@pd7tw3no...