Christina Aguilera hot sex nude 4453

[James A. Cooley]

To the new folks here that might be tempted: Let us assume it is as
virus-laden as just about all the others.

Also, some of these new virus posts I have found have been able to slither
by at least one major-label virus scanner until the file had copied itself
onto your harddrive and tried to open the backdoor for an invasion.

Previous versions could be detected if you tried to forward them (like to an
abuse address) or if you scanned them.

Having the virus detected by your scanner AFTER it infects your system is a
real possibility with some of these new variants. It means having to go
through the trouble of removing it, editing registries, etc. Not that hard,
but still not worth the trouble to look at airheaded popstars without
clothes.

And yes, I speak on this from personal experiance. I was sure one of these
"Britney Spears Nude" files that wasn't tripping the scanner was infected,
so went ahead and executed it on a system to check it out. I then got a
virus warning, but only after the program had installed the backdoor and was
trying to contact the author.

I did it fully prepared to do cleanup later to be able to confirm the
attachment was a virus to document a complaint. But, I am assuming most
folks would rather not have to do viral cleanup if their scanner misses one
on the first pass.

So, don't assume your virus scanner will always be able to root out the
viruses from the genuine "hot sex nude" spam. ;-)

And again, this warning is just for the newbies. Anyone else on the Internet
for any time at all knows not to open mystery attachments.

"hoes" <ho...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:CGSBb.116111$dl.48...@twister.southeast.rr.com...
> Christina Aguilera hot sex nude
>
>
>
>
>
6#'T9*m:sr-G.u\'>S#ojy=QjwU!y@Th`1h,T-iwg9p7b6^?.E>(nS%+rq)^Tm$R`_7X,<vka;*]
4PTTQ_'i`>/Q"=P"OHJ;sNpe
>