Question regarding sdrodrian and universe expansion
S D Rodrian
"J. Scott Miller" <Scott....@louisville.edu> wrote:
> mykrowyre wrote:
> >
> > Ok I just accidentally stumbled
> > into SRodrians rantings and after
> > reading about 3 sentences was overcome
> > with an idea. This might be was
> > SRodrian is trying to say too... but here goes:
> >
> > What effect would we notice if we
> > were being sucked into a black hole?
>
> This is addressed somewhat in Ted Bunn's Black Hole FAQ:
> http://cfpa.berkeley.edu/BHfaq.html,
>
> There is also a section on black holes
> in the Usenet relativity FAQ:
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/relativity.html
> >
> > 1) Matter would get compressed as
> > being pulled towards singularity.
> > 2) From the perspective of the compressing
> > matter, everything further
> > away from us would seem to be
> > accelerating away from us and expanding
> > because we would not be able to measure
> > or comprehend our own
> > compression. The further matter is
> > from the gravitational pull of the
> > black hole, the faster it would appear
> > to be moving away from us.
You're getting close, but you missed
(good as a mile).
> > 3) Isn't our galaxy essentially a black hole?
>
> No, though it may harbor one at its core.
> >
> > So, I agree that instead of the
> > universe expanding we could be
> > shrinking, just like everything else
> > in the universe, as it is being
> > pulled towards a singularity.
> >
> > -tom
>
> One small problem with Mr. Rodrian's claims
Thank God it's small.
> - he won't publish them in a
> peer-reviewed astrophysical,
> physics, or astronomy journal.
Are you mad?!?! Can you imagine
Galileo submitting his observations
to the Church-approved-only periodicals
of his day? I've been wracked enough as it is.
> He will make all
> sorts of claims
Haven't claimed to be a gazebo yet
(mmmm... interesting claim, though).
> as to why this hasn't been done,
> but frankly, he is blowing
> smoke unless he can and brings
> the scientific community into the discussion.
Sorry: I never discuss things with
children. I can wait until you grow up.
For the time being, my only interest
is in delighting and tickling you; for I still
love children... the good and the bad.
> There are problems with his ideas which
> have been addressed much in the past
[Fortunately... Mr. Miller will NEVER, EVER,
under any circumstances, tell you exactly where
the location of those problems is, and not even
if he's offered money to do it, because he knows
that deposited at that site are also the now
infamous Internet pixs of him having sex with a
goat. It's nothing personal, though, just funny.]
> and which he has never been able to
> address other than by hand-waving.
Well, I do what I can; and ever will:
I don't think I can reply to all the posts
here (there, and everywhere), but I'll
give it a shot... tomorrow: Gotta wake up
early tomorrow. So, I'll just wave g'night!
S D Rodrian
web.sdrodrian.com
sdrodrian.com
music.sdrodrian.com
> --
> J. Scott Miller, Program Coordinator
> Scott....@louisville.edu
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
S D Rodrian
"Michael Varney" <mva...@muswest.net> wrote:
> "Mercury481" <mercu...@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:20001230212017...@ng-cg1.aol.com...
> > SDR exclaimed:
> > >Are you mad?!?! Can you imagine
> > >Galileo submitting his observations
> > >to the Church-approved-only periodicals
> > >of his day? I've been wracked enough as it is.
> >
> > Elevate yourself to the level of pioneering genius.
Well, if I don't do it--Who will????? I know
I've been waiting for you to baptize me for
close to 33 years now! You don'y do it soon,
I'm telling you: You're gonna lose your coconut.
> > Wow, it took a few hundred
> > years for the world to see Galileo's
> > genius but were you are concerned, I'll
> > just take your word that you are one.
It kinda makes me sad you're not going to
live a couple of hundred years more: You
would be SO surprised, let me tell you!
> > Anybody noticed how crackpots like to
> > associate themselves to historical
> > figures so as to make the claim that
> > calling them crackpots would be like
> > calling the historical figures crackpots as well?
Yeah. As a matter of fact I have noticed that!
Mmmmm... wonder how come they (we) don't
choose to associate themselves to historical
dumb bunnies? It's inexplicable! Thank you,
Barney, for pointing this astonishing paradox!
> Go here for more on the crank.
>
> www.crank.net
Hey! I used to be prominently listed at:
http://www.crank.net/physics.html
Now I can't find myself (I smell sabotage
... especially under me armpits). O well,
that's a good lead right there. Sniff, sniff!
> This is a scoring system.
> Rodrian scores highly on this.
>
> http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
Yeah, but I also do get -5 point starting credit. And
the universe IS imploding, not expanding [I think I saw
a pretty cat]; but if you can't read this I will
speak it outloud; and "melon" is really spelled
"mellon" I'd have you know; but if you think about
something long enough you won't have to give it
that much thought; THINK ABOUT IT; Einstein must
have, as Hawking, and even Feynmann too; but I would
NEVER trust any quantum mechanics with my car, they'll
all fundamentally misguided, or drunk most of the time;
I learn this in the second grade (which I repeated
seven times, by the way, so nobody can say I wasn't
thoroughly schooled in the second grade); besides:
I've been working on my theory now... oh, it's gotta
be two/three hundred years now; and I sent it to
Walter Cronkite... instructing him not to show it to
anybody, not even his grandmother, so nobody would
read it before me; I even offered him a nickel if
he could disprove my theory; told ole Walter, "I might
not be good at math, but my theory is conceptually right,
so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of
equations" and he offered to do it right there on his
abacus, great guy; as you know, the current well-established
has many points against it, such as it only being a theory,
after all; Oh... it might even predict phenomena correctly,
but it doesn't explain "why" they occur, and fails to provide
a "mechanism;" this is why I'm much handsomer than Einstein
and why his special or general relativity are fundamentally
misguided: the dude was just plain ugly; this makes my work
practically a "paradigm shift" right on the cutting edge;
and if it doesn't get me the Nobel I'll ring it myself;
because me * Newton are "like that" except he liked to wear
women's clothes when he was working on his buggy (so you
see: even classical mechanics were fundamentally misguided
and a total bunk of perverts; all you have to do to prove this
is to fly around the planet earth backwards fast enough to
travel back in time, and you'll be able to check it out for
yourself; but, sure, they laughed when I sat down to play
the piano--but that was only because I forgot to actually
rent a piano... it was some "hidebound reactionary" bastard
who got the concert hall's address wrong... that "self-appointed
defender of the orthodoxy" peacock wouldn't even check with
me because that wasn't going by the book; even Bill Clinton
claims in public he went by the book, while secretly wiping
his P's on the pages; Hell, even Feynmann was a closet opponent
of special relativity, as deduced by reading between the lines
in his freshman physics textbooks... and happening to be in
his house while he was talking to himself in his closet; and
in his later years, Einstein too was groping his way towards
the ideas me & Bill Clinton now advocate (but he was too old
by then to run from the cops); I'd like to take credit for
my theories, but. being as honest as I am, I have to, in all
fairness, acknowledge that "my" theories were actually developed
by an extraterrestrial civilization from the planet Tcfkzxal;
which might go a long ways to explaining why those who argue
against my ideas always turn out in the end to be Nazis, storm-
troopers, or brownshirts (from the way they eat chocolate);
It's a well-known conspiracy the "scientific establishment"
is engaged in to prevent my work from gaining its well-deserved
fame, or suchlike; I'm like poor Galileo, victim of a modern-day
Inquisition which is hard at work on my case, and so on; but
hen my theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be
seen for the sham it truly is and then scientists who mocked my
theories will finally be brought to public trials before the
Politburo of Modernity and forced to recant; hiccup; for I have
a revolutionary theory about Nothingness, but, naturally... what
concrete testable predictions can one make about Nothingness. So
I will leave it there for future generations to judge & be happy!
Courtesy,
S D Rodrian
wisdom.findhere.org
sdrodrian.com
web.sdrodrian.com
PS Well deserved thanks to John Baez
of ba...@math.ucr.edu ... for being the
best straight man in this business of
(normally) a gaggle of fairies. And a hand
for his marvelous rendition of that old
folk classic:
"Michael Varney's gone abroad: Halleluya!"
-- 30 --