"Is String Theory Justified?"
Muidem
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the generation of a
"theory of everything". It is the goal to generate a single set of equations
which deals with all physical processes. Mathematical theoreticians have
apparently been successful in generating five theories which meet the
requirements. Some of those theories require 11 dimensions while the others
require 26 dimensions, as compared to the four dimensions (3 length and 1
time), of common experience.
The fact that those higher number of dimensions are required shows that
some of the included processes are completely independent of each other. If
this were not true, the extra dimensions would not be required. To the
writer, the search for a single theory is about as sensible as an effort to
create a single master drawing which would show an automobile engine in its
entirety rather than as an assembly of individually defined parts. It could
be done, but it would be so unwieldy as to be useless. Treating the parts as
individual and independent entities and then showing how thy fit together
has been found to be a much more useful practice.
When we look at the processes which are described in superstring theory
we find that we are describing independent process which operate in the same
region of space. The resultant can be obtained by treating them as
independent processes and obtaining the results by combining them using the
principle of superposition. (This is what us simple folks do instintively.)
The extra dimensions added by string theorists has the effect of
compartmentalized the processes since each of the dimensions they employ
must be mathematically orthoganal to all the others It would seem that
string theory is a sophisticated way of achieving the same result as the
simpler process of superposition.
It is unfortunate that Dr. Einstein had to resort to the fakery of
"curved space" in order to overcome the defect caused by the sophomoric
error he made in the generation of General Relativity. Instead of doing his
mathematics correctly, he made the equations solve by adding an extra degree
of freedom. string theorists hav not added one extra dimension, as did Dr.
Einstein, they added as many as 22! It would appear that the most useful
result of string theory is to provide employment for theoretical physicists.
ANY JACKASS, OR GROUP THEREOF, CAN MAKE A FAULTY THEORY WORK BE ADDING
ONE OR MORE SUPERLOUS DEGREES OF FREEDOM. THE THING THAT SEPARATES THE MEN
FROM THE BOYS IS THE ABILITY TO DEFINE NATURE IN TERMS OF THE THREE SPATIAL
AND ONE TEMPORAL DIMENSION WHICH WE CAN OBSERVE.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einste...@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
Muidem
KONCHOK.PENDAY
Muidem [mui...@verizon.net] wrote:
> "Is String Theory Justified?"
NO! IT'S WHACKO WANK!
> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
>
> The holy grail of theoretical physics seems to be the
> generation of a "theory of everything".
WHICH HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE
BY RADO WITH THE AETHER THEORY!
> It is the goal to generate a single set of equations
> which deals with all physical processes.
NO! EQUATIONS ARE NOT PHYSICS!
THE GOAL IS TO GENERATE A
*THEORY*, NOT AN EQUATION!
> Mathematical theoreticians have apparently been successful
> in generating five theories which meet the
> requirements.
BUT THOSE ARE JUST EQUATIONS!
THEY HAVE NO PHYSICAL MEANING!
BUT RADO HAS ALREADY
SOLVED THE WHOLE THING!
YOU JUST NEED TO
CATCH UP TO 1994!
> Some of those theories require 11 dimensions while the others
> require 26 dimensions, as compared to the four dimensions
> (3 length and 1 time), of common experience.
YES! FOUR IS ALL YOU NEED!
THE PROBLEM IS ALREADY SOLVED!
> The fact that those higher number of dimensions are required
> shows that some of the included processes are completely independent
> of each other. If this were not true, the extra dimensions would not
> be required.
THEY ARE *NOT* REQUIRED!
DIMENSIONS 5 THRU N ARE
*HEXCLUSIVELY* FOR WANK!
> To the writer, the search for a single theory is about as sensible as
> an effort to create a single master drawing which would show an
> automobile engine in its entirety rather than as an assembly of
> individually defined parts.
SO YOU THINK THE UNIVERSE IS
UNINTELLIGIBLE AND UNEXPLAINABLE?
IT DOESN'T REALLY WORK?
> It could be done,
IT HAS BEEN DONE!
YOU JUST NEED
TO FIND OUT!
> but it would be so unwieldy as to be useless. Treating the parts as
> individual and independent entities and then showing how thy fit
> together has been found to be a much more useful practice.
ON THE CONTRARY IT IS
STUNNINGLY COMPACT,
ELEGANT AND EFFICIENT!
> When we look at the processes which are described in
> superstring theory we find that we are describing independent
> process which operate in the same region of space.
IN OTHER WORDS:
IT'S ALL WANK!
> The resultant can be obtained by treating them as
> independent processes and obtaining the results by combining
> them using the principle of superposition.
OR JUST FLUSH TWICE!
> (This is what us simple folks do instintively.)
> The extra dimensions added by string theorists has the effect of
> compartmentalized the processes since each of the dimensions they
> employ must be mathematically orthoganal to all the others
PURE WANK!
YOU MIGHT AS WELL CALCULATE
EPICYCLES, OR HOW MANY ANGELS
CAN DANCE ON THE HEAD OF A PIN!
> It would seem that string theory is a sophisticated
> way of achieving the same result as the
> simpler process of superposition.
IN OTHER WORDS:
PURE WANK!
> It is unfortunate that Dr. Einstein had to resort to the
< fakery of "curved space" in order to overcome the defect caused
> by the sophomoric error he made in the generation of General
> Relativity.
EVERYTHING ABOUT
THAT GONIFF WANKER
IS UNFORTUNATE!
EXCEPT THAT HE'S
FINALLY DEAD NOW!
> Instead of doing his mathematics correctly, he made the equations
> solve by adding an extra degree of freedom.
WHAT DID YOU HEXPECT
FROM A GONIFF WANKER?
> string theorists hav not added one extra dimension, as did Dr.
> Einstein, they added as many as 22!
WHY NOT 50 OR 100?
THEY ARE ALL IMAGINARY!
YOU CAN IMAGINE AS
MANY AS YOU WANT!
> It would appear that the most useful result of string theory
> is to provide employment for theoretical physicists.
WANKERS NEED JOBS TOO!
> ANY JACKASS, OR GROUP THEREOF, CAN MAKE A FAULTY THEORY WORK
> BE ADDING ONE OR MORE SUPERLOUS DEGREES OF FREEDOM. THE THING THAT
> SEPARATES THE MEN FROM THE BOYS IS THE ABILITY TO DEFINE NATURE IN
> TERMS OF THE THREE SPATIAL AND ONE TEMPORAL DIMENSION
> WHICH WE CAN OBSERVE.
THAT'S WHY RADO IS
THE KING OF PHYSICS!
[...BIG SNIP...]
IF YOU WANT TO
UNDERSTAND PHYSICS
YOU GOTTA READ RADO!
NO ONE ELSE HAS
THE CLUES HE DOES!
HE FIGURED OUT
THE WHOLE GAME!
EVERYBODY ELSE IS
PLAYING CATCH-UP
SINCE 1994!
CATCH-UP!
LEARN TO LAUGH
AT THE WANKERS!
READ RADO!
BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================
NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!
Even better than
Richard McKeon!
But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!
HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!
Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/
My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.
That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1529