Time Rate in the Universe
Jason Voll
When an object is going at the speed of light, it has a time rate of zero.
So between the speed of zero and the speed of light, I always asked myself
what the time rate between them. Now I have developed an equation (after
2-3 hours) that shows what the time rate would be.
C= % of speed of light
T= Time rate
The equation is:
(1/C)/100=T (this one is use when C= < speed of light)
(1/C)/-100=T (this is use when C=> speed of light)
Earth has a time rate of 0.99909462
If you go at the speed of 99% light, time rate = 0.0001, so if you left for
what felt to you as 1 year, back on Earth about 10,000 years have past.
These equation could be the beginning of time-travel, but we need to find
away to be able to develop a hole that makes it that time around the craft
is afected, instead of the living objects within the craft.
Ryan Voll
JLeeMSPub1
Mr. Voll is exactly right. When an object travels at the speed of light, its
time rate is ZERO. To the Relativists, this slowing of time due to velocity, or
"Time Dilation", is ONLY due to "appearances and measurements". It has now been
recently discovered, but is not generally known (since Relativity currently
completely dominates all of physics) that this is actually due to the fact that
time, itself, has a physical displacement with space in that light travels at
the "SPEED OF TIME" i.e., the speed of light and the "speed of time" are one
and the same thing. This is why an object traveling at the speed of light
experiences an infinite time dilation - bacause by traveling at the speed of
light the moving clock would also be traveling along with the omnidirectional
"speed of time through space" and consequently, since it would be moving along
with the "NOW POINT" in time as time travels outward into space, no time would
displace it, and it would experience the passing of no time at all meaning its
hands would stop rotating completely, as a "still" clock records one full
second to pass (since time displacing a clock is what causes its hands to
rotate). The obvious problem with this is that it is TOO OBVIOUS to be
recognized by the Relativists, and, besides, it would completely destroy their
hyper-mathematical ediface within which they subjectively analyse their
hyper-mathematical subjectivity and completely destroy Theoretical Physics
today as we know it.. The discovery of the "OMNIDIRECTIONAL SPEED OF TIME
THROUGH SPACE" is however enivitible since it reveals, not only the correct
reason for time dilation, but also the real reason why time dialtion occurs at
a nonlinear rate with respect to a linear increase in velocity. However, since,
as stated, Relativity presently completely dominates physics, it will be
sometime before this new CORRECT description of the relationship of motion to
space and time is generally known.
Jeff Lee MINDSIGHT PUBLICATIONS
James M. Frisby
I'm sorry you spent all that time developing that equation. Einstein
published his in 1915:
Let t0 be the rate of time when your velocity is zero; v is your current
velocity; c is, of course, the speed of light; and x^y represents "x to the
y power." The rate of time, t, is therefore:
t = t0 ( 1 - v^2/c^2 ) ^ 0.5
Note that if your speed exceeds that of light, your rate of time is not
simply negative, but negative in an imaginary direction (since it involves
the square root of negative values). Don't ask me to interpret imaginary
time. I know that it shows up in studies about the Big Bang, so it
supposedly has a legitimate meaning, but the point is that it isn't a direct
means of time travel.
Jason Voll wrote in message <01bd2869$b073d420$LocalHost@comp1>...
>When an object is going at the speed of light, it has a time rate of zero.
>So between the speed of zero and the speed of light, I always asked myself
>what the time rate between them. Now I have developed an equation (after
>2-3 hours) that shows what the time rate would be.
>
>C= % of speed of light
>T= Time rate
>
>The equation is:
>
> (1/C)/100=T (this one is use when C= < speed of light)
>
>
> (1/C)/-100=T (this is use when C=> speed of light)
>
>Ryan Voll
Jerry Grushow
James M. Frisby wrote:
>
> I'm sorry you spent all that time developing that equation. Einstein
> published his in 1915:
>
> Let t0 be the rate of time when your velocity is zero; v is your current
> velocity; c is, of course, the speed of light; and x^y represents "x to the
> y power." The rate of time, t, is therefore:
>
> t = t0 ( 1 - v^2/c^2 ) ^ 0.5
>
> Note that if your speed exceeds that of light, your rate of time is not
> simply negative, but negative in an imaginary direction (since it involves
> the square root of negative values). Don't ask me to interpret imaginary
> time. I know that it shows up in studies about the Big Bang, so it
> supposedly has a legitimate meaning, but the point is that it isn't a direct
> means of time travel.
Yesterday does not exist. The reason for this is that the energy of
yesterday becomes the energy of today. Only a little energy is used up
in the expansion of the universe. Thus the energy that is used up
retains the memory of yesterday. When we die, we enter the world of
the memory of yesterday. That is how we exist although we are dead.
This enables man to reincarnate. The memory of a man becomes a man
again. Thus the imaginary solution is extemely important to us.
The living cannot time travel, but the dead can be born again
directly into the mind of a forming fetus.
god
Ryan Voll
Einsteins theory of time in an equation is:
t=t0(1-v^2/c^2)^0.5
But when you calculate it at the speed of light, time equals zero. And
with what we know is, when time = 0, everything stops. So how can light be
able to move, the electrons within in the light ray have to be moving as
well, and if time = 0, the electrons will stop moving.
But with the equation:
t=(1/%c)/100
shows that time at the speed of light equals 0.0001.
So if we stay with Einsein's theory, how can light travel?
Ryan Voll