"Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
Tecuaf
(See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr.
Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference frames. It
was his contention that the force produced by a gravitational field could be
considered to be equivalent to the inertial force produced by a spatial
acceleration. The result was a postulate, the Principle of Equivalence,
which along with the Principle of Relativity upon which Special Relativity
was based, led to the generation of the General Theory of Relativity.
Dr. Einstein struggled for a year and a half to solve the mathematics
involved and finally produced the General Theory of Relativity. For this
effort he is considered to be a world class genius on a par with Newton.
What is conveniently forgotten is that in order to solve the mathematics he
was forced to invent the idea of "curved space" to make the mathematical
solution
work, it would not work in terms of our familiar three dimensional space!
When this introduction was introduced at a convention of physicists
considering General Relativity, it was accepted with the comment "why
shouldn't we consider space to be curved NOBODY CAN PROVE THAT IT ISN'T".
(Weren't they objective scientists?)
An alarm bell should ring when one examines the conclusions of General
Relativity and of Special Relativity. One does not need a high level of
brilliance or education to recognize that the two theories are incompatible
and, as a result, cannot satisfy the Principle of Equivalence! Somewhere in
the mathematics an error had been made. The existence of this error is made
evident
by the fact that, in a force-length-time system of measurement, there
exists, under Special Relativity, the Lorentz Transformations for Length and
for Time. Under General Relativity, on the other hand, while there is a
transformation for time (the time dilation), there is no analogous
transformation for length. It is the absence of this transformation which
required the concept of "curved space" to make the mathematics self
consistent.
General Relativity was accepted after it "correctly" predicted the time
dilation, the precession of Mercury's Orbit, and the bending of light as it
passed the Sun. What was conveniently overlooked was the fact that the Sun's
field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal the error which
exists. (This error could be observed in the vicinity of a neutron star, but
the observation would have to be coupled with a close in orbital observation
to be
meaningful.)
When one examines the mathematical treatment which produced General
Relativity to find the source of obvious error in the theory, it is not hard
to find that error. The mathematics involved the double integration of and
equation in the form:- (dS)^2= (dX)^2+(dY)^2+(dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 where Kt is
the time transformation provided by Special Relativity.
Anyone who is familiar with integral calculus will recognize that, to
be rigorously correct, coefficients must be provided for the length terms
(dX), (dY), and (dZ). The failure to include such coefficients arbitrarily
sets them at unity. The effect is, to borrow a term from the legal
profession, the arbitrary assumption of a fact not yet in evidence. Adding
such coefficients does not introduce an error, if they are not required the
mathematical solution will set them at unity and no harm will be done. If
they are required, the solution will either be in error or will be
impossible (as was the case with General Relativity). Unfortunately, instead
of correcting this error, Dr. Einstein resorted to the fakery of "curved
space"! For the derivation of General
Relativity to have been rigorous, the equation to be integrated should have
been written: (dS)^2= (Kx*dX)^2+(Ky*dY)^2+(Kz*dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 While
separate coefficients for X, Y, and Z are required for rigor, it is not
unreasonable to assume that space is isotropic and set Kx, Ky, and Kz are
equal and set them equal to K. If this had been done, General Relativity
would have yielded its result in terms of our normal three dimensional
Euclidean Space.
The existence of this error is evident in the difficulty in reconciling
General Relativity with Quantum Theory without mathematically resorting to
fictitious extra dimensions (eleven dimensional space seems to be currently
in vogue). When one corrects the information provided by General Relativity,
which has been derived independently by two other independent methods, an
entirely different picture of reality emerges. Energy is found to be
conserved in the absolute sense, the source of the force of gravity is
revealed, and our cosmological observations are provided with a clear
explanation. It shows that the "big bang" origin of our universe never
happened. As observed from the inside of a gravitationally collapsing
object, the object appears to contract until a radius of four times the
horizon radius is reached and then is observed to expand to an infinite
radius as its absolute radius contracts to the horizon radius. Gravity is
revealed to be a force resulting from the release of mass energy due to the
contraction of matter as a result of a reduction of elevation. The subject
is treated in detail in
http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm.
The source material for this posting may be found in
http://einsteinhoax.com/hoax.htm (1997); http://einsteinhoax.com/gravity.htm
(1987); and http://einsteinhoax.com/relcor.htm (1997). EVERYTHING WHICH WE
ACCEPT AS TRUE MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING ELSE WE HAVE ACCEPTED AS
TRUE, IT MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH ALL OBSERVATIONS, AND IT MUST BE
MATHEMATICALLY VIABLE. PRESENT TEACHINGS DO NOT ALWAYS MEET THIS
REQUIREMENT. THE WORLD IS ENTITLED TO A HIGHER STANDARD OF WORKMANSHIP FROM
THOSE IT HAS GRANTED WORLD CLASS STATUS.
All of the Newsposts made by this site may be viewed at the
http://einsteinhoax.com/postinglog.htm.
Please make any response via E-mail as Newsgroups are not monitored on
a regular basis. Objective responses will be treated with the same courtesy
as they are presented. To prevent the wastage of time on both of our parts,
please do not raise objections that are not related to material that you
have read at the Website. This posting is merely a summary.
E-mail:- einste...@verizon.net. If you wish a reply, be sure that
your mail reception is not blocked.
The material at the Website has been posted continuously for over 8
years. In that time THERE HAVE BEEN NO OBJECTIVE REBUTTALS OF ANY OF THE
MATERIAL PRESENTED. There have only been hand waving arguments by
individuals who have mindlessly accepted the prevailing wisdom without
questioning it. If anyone provides a significant rebuttal that cannot be
objectively answered, the material at the Website will be withdrawn.
Challenges to date have revealed only the responder's inadequacy with one
exception for which a correction was provided.
KONCHOK.PENDAY
Tecuaf [tec...@verizon.net] wrote:
> "Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2"
> (See also our sister website reticsessays.com)
> Following his success with The Special Theory of Relativity, Dr.
> Einstein extended his approach to include accelerated reference
> frames. It was his contention that the force produced by a
> gravitational field could be considered to be equivalent to the
> inertial force produced by a spatial acceleration. The result
> was a postulate, the Principle of Equivalence, which along
> with the Principle of Relativity upon which Special Relativity
> was based, led to the generation of the General Theory of Relativity.
WANK HEXPANDS!
> Dr. Einstein struggled for a year and a half to solve the
> mathematics involved and finally produced the General Theory of
> Relativity. For this effort he is considered to be a world class
> genius on a par with Newton.
YES! TWO IDIOT ASSHOLES
WHO FUCKED UP PHYSICS FOR
HUNDREDS OF YEARS NOW!
> What is conveniently forgotten is that in order to solve the
> mathematics he was forced to invent the idea of "curved space"
> to make the mathematical solution work, it would not work in
> terms of our familiar three dimensional space!
I LOOKED AT MY SPACE, BUT
COULDN'T FIND THE CURVE!
> When this introduction was introduced at a convention of physicists
> considering General Relativity, it was accepted with the comment "why
> shouldn't we consider space to be curved
> NOBODY CAN PROVE THAT IT ISN'T".
> (Weren't they objective scientists?)
And yet peole *LAUGH* when I say
I am the world's greatest lover!
> An alarm bell should ring when one examines the conclusions
> of General Relativity and of Special Relativity. One does not
> need a high level of brilliance or education to recognize that
> the two theories are incompatible and, as a result, cannot
> satisfy the Principle of Equivalence! Somewhere in
> the mathematics an error had been made. The existence of
> this error is made evident by the fact that, in a
> force-length-time system of measurement, there
> exists, under Special Relativity, the Lorentz Transformations
> for Length and for Time. Under General Relativity, on
> the other hand, while there is a transformation for time
> (the time dilation), there is no analogous
> transformation for length. It is the absence of this
> transformation which required the concept of "curved space"
> to make the mathematics self consistent.
YES! IT'S ALL WANK!
> General Relativity was accepted after it "correctly"
> predicted the time dilation, the precession of Mercury's
> Orbit, and the bending of light as it passed the Sun.
> What was conveniently overlooked was the fact that the Sun's
> field is about 5 orders of magnitude too weak to reveal the
> error which exists. (This error could be observed in the
> vicinity of a neutron star, but the observation would have
> to be coupled with a close in orbital observation to be
> meaningful.)
And yet they deny my claim to
be the world's greatest lover!
> When one examines the mathematical treatment which produced
> General Relativity to find the source of obvious error in the
> theory, it is not hard to find that error. The mathematics
> involved the double integration of and equation in the form:
> - (dS)^2= (dX)^2+(dY)^2+(dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2 where Kt is
> the time transformation provided by Special Relativity.
IT'S ALL CRAP!
> Anyone who is familiar with integral calculus will
> recognize that, to be rigorously correct, coefficients
> must be provided for the length terms (dX), (dY), and (dZ).
> The failure to include such coefficients arbitrarily sets
> them at unity. The effect is, to borrow a term from the legal
> profession, the arbitrary assumption of a fact not yet in evidence.
WHICH IS PERFECTLY
ACCEPTABLE FOR WANK!
> Adding such coefficients does not introduce an error,
> if they are not required the mathematical solution will
> set them at unity and no harm will be done. If they are
> required, the solution will either be in error or will be
> impossible (as was the case with General Relativity).
WANK CANNOT BE REVIVED!
> Unfortunately, instead of correcting this error,
> Dr. Einstein resorted to the fakery of "curved space"!
BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WANKERS DO!
> For the derivation of General Relativity to have
> been rigorous, the equation to be integrated should have been
> written: (dS)^2= (Kx*dX)^2+(Ky*dY)^2+(Kz*dZ)^2-(Kt*C*dT)^2
>While separate coefficients for X, Y, and Z are required
> for rigor, it is not unreasonable to assume that space
> is isotropic and set Kx, Ky, and Kz are
> equal and set them equal to K. If this had been done,
> General Relativity would have yielded its result
> in terms of our normal three dimensional Euclidean Space.
NO! THAT'S FAR TOO SIMPLE!
WE OBVIOUSLY NEED SOMETHING
*VERY* MYSTERIOUS AND COMPLEX
WHICH *ONLY* A MATHEMATICIAN
COULD PRETEND TO UNDERSTAND!
MAKE THOSE YOKELS FEEL STUPID!
> The existence of this error is evident in the difficulty
> in reconciling General Relativity with Quantum Theory without
> mathematically resorting to fictitious extra dimensions
> (eleven dimensional space seems to be currently in vogue).
DIMENSIONS 4 THRU N
ARE *JUST* FOR WANK!
> When one corrects the information provided by General Relativity,
> which has been derived independently by two other independent
> methods, an entirely different picture of reality emerges.
YES! IT'S ALL WANK!
> Energy is found to be
> conserved in the absolute sense,
> the source of the force of gravity is revealed,
ONLY BY RADO!
> and our cosmological observations are provided with a clear
> explanation. It shows that the "big bang" origin of our
> universe never happened.
THANK YOU!
THAT'S CRAP TOO!
> As observed from the inside of a gravitationally collapsing
> object, the object appears to contract until a radius of four
> times the horizon radius is reached and then is observed
> to expand to an infinite radius as its absolute radius
> contracts to the horizon radius.
IF YOU SAY SO!
> Gravity is revealed to be a force resulting from the
> release of mass energy due to the contraction of
> matter as a result of a reduction of elevation.
NO.
YOU GOTTA READ RADO
TO UNDERSTAND GRAVITY!
THERE IS NO OTHER WAY!
*ONLY* HE FIGURED IT OUT!
BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================
NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!
It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!
Even better than
Richard McKeon!
But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!
HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!
THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.
THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!
CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!
Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/
My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm
See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!
Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.
That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!
O
--- )
\
NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1455