I saved it to last because out of:
Energy\Matter
In Motion\At Rest
Attraction\Repulsion
It was going to be the hardest for you to understand.
To understand it you must bring the 2 opposing views of:
Religion ( non-physical )
or
Atheism ( physical )
Together.
Our aether = nothing.
To understand this you have to understand the inverse of our physical
universe:
Physical-verse ( our universe )
or
Non-physical-verse ( religious\spiritual universe or 'afterlife' )
In the physical-verse there are only 2 physical things:
Energy
or
Matter
In the non-physical-verse there are only 2 non-physical things:
X
or
Y
Those 2 physical or non-physical things can only be in 2 states:
In Motion
or
At Rest
When energy\matter or x\y is 'In Motion' it generates physical\non-
physical attraction.
When energy\matter or x\y is 'At Rest' it generates physical\non-
physical repulsion.
--------------------------------------------------------
Now, onto the 'aether'.
Naturally, there are 2 opposing aethers:
Physical-verse Aether = Nothing
or
Non-physical-verse Aether = Something
The reason the non-physical-verse aether = 'something' is because the
2 'non-physical things' have to 'sit' in 'something' - you cannot have
'non-physical' things sitting in 'nothing'.
The inverse is true for our physical-verse.
Our 2 'physical things' have to sit in 'nothing'. You cannot have
physical things sitting in 'something' because obviously those
physical things would crash into the 'something'.
This is why in the physical-verse everything appears to be moving.
Even when energy\matter is 'At Rest' it does so by moving.
The inverse is true for the non-physical-verse.
Because x\y are sitting in an aether of 'something' those x\y are
always 'At Rest'. Even when x\y are 'In Motion' they do so by being
'At Rest'.
---------------------------------------
So what are:
X
or
Y
of the non-physical-verse?
I don't know I'll leave it up to you guys to ponder.
-Josh.
The aether is the most important concept. The immaterial is next.
Mitch Raemsch
idiot
http://arXiv.org/abs/0706.2031
Physics Today 57(7) 40 (2004)
http://physicstoday.org/vol-57/iss-7/p40.shtml
<http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/Walsworth/pdf/PT_Romalis0704.pdf>
No aether
<http://relativity.livingreviews.org/Articles/lrr-2005-5/index.html>
http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0287
No Lorentz violation
idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm