Physical FORCE , & What It REALLY IS
rem...@aol.com
Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS
Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
REALLY IS. The best that they can do is to define it in
terms of what it DOES--accelerate a mass, (F = ma).
Yet, they ARROGANTLY use the terms "PSEUDO-FORCE" and
"FICTIONAL FORCE" to describe forces like CENTRIFUGAL
FORCE and the CORIOLIS FORCE. The physicists have
FAILED to pick up the CLUE, about what a force really
IS, from the fact that these so-called "pseudo-forces"
result from MOTIONS.
According to the GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the
Physical Universe developed by the late Physicist Dewey
B. Larson, each force is a MOTION, or a COMBINATION OF
MOTIONS, or a RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS, including
INWARD and OUTWARD SCALAR MOTIONS, in the form of
TRANSLATIONAL, VIBRATIONAL, ROTATIONAL, or ROTATIONAL-
VIBRATIONAL motions.
For example, the expansion of the Physical Universe
is simply an OUTWARD SCALAR MOTION, which is an INHERENT
PROPERTY of the Universe and NOT a result of a "big
bang", [which means that "Hubble's constant", whatever
its correct value, can NOT be used to determine the age
of the Physical Universe.].
Gravitation is an INWARD SCALAR MOTION that obeys
the inverse square law. MOTION is what makes a
homogeneous gravitational field "EQUIVALENT" to a
uniformly accelerated reference frame, (which is in a
certain kind of MOTION).
For objects moving at speeds close to the speed of
light, acceleration drops toward zero, (a = F/m), NOT
because "mass increases toward infinity" (mass really
STAYS CONSTANT), but because FORCE decreases toward ZERO
(because of the RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIONS of the
near-light speed of the object and the OUTWARD SCALAR
MOTION of light at the speed of light, which is UNIT
VELOCITY).
In Larson's Theory, the "strong nuclear force" and
the "weak nuclear force" DO NOT EXIST. They are merely
AD HOC ASSUMPTIONS, resulting from an ERRONEOUS model of
the atom.
A WEALTH of information about Physicist Dewey B.
Larson's GENERAL UNIFIED Theory of the Physical
Universe, ("The Reciprocal System of Theory"), can now
be found at the web site http://www.rstheory.com .
See also:
http://members.aol.com/GalactcFed/universe.txt .
Robert E. McElwaine
B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
http://members.aol.com/rem460
Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
ALSO http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/
P.S.: PASS IT ON !
"EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
"The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
"The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
"OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
"The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
>
>
>
N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)
> B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
> http://members.aol.com/rem547 PLUS
> http://members.aol.com/rem460
> Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
> ALSO http://www.geocities.com/remspiral7/
>
> P.S.: PASS IT ON !
>
>
> "EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
> "The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
> "The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
> "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
> "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
"McElwaine rates HIGH on the CRACKPOT list."
David A. Smith
Uncle Al
>
> 6>
> Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS
>
> Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
> REALLY IS.
"Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
> Robert E. McElwaine
> B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
Is that like, you know, sorta Science for Nurses? How did your alma
mater rank versus say the Michigan State Facility for the
Pathologically Noisome?
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Bill Hobba
<rem...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1193098341.9...@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>6>
> Physical FORCE -- What It REALLY IS
>
> Most orthodox physicists do NOT know what a force
> REALLY IS.
Since its definition is clear and unambiguous the only issue is if it is
consistent. As generations of physicists have failed to find an
inconsistency one must deduce it is as consistent as 1+1 =2.
In your case that is probably true.
Bill
Don Stockbauer
wrote:
> > Robert E. McElwaine
> > B.S., Physics and Astronomy, UW-EC
> > http://members.aol.com/rem547PLUS
> > http://members.aol.com/rem460
> > Preserve BOTH on CD-R and PRINT-OUTS
>
> > P.S.: PASS IT ON !
>
> > "EVERYTHING you know is WRONG."
> > "The Truth IS STRANGER than fiction."
> > "The Truth is ALWAYS the FIRST CASUALTY OF WAR."
> > "OFFICIAL LIES are ALWAYS the BIGGEST LIES OF ALL."
> > "The more things change, the more they STAY THE SAME."
>
> "McElwaine rates HIGH on the CRACKPOT list."
>
> David A. Smith
One man's crackpot is another man's meta-general systems thinker.