Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why do we have the principle of equivalence

0 views
Skip to first unread message

fitz

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 1:20:50 PM12/17/09
to
Why do we have the principle of equivalence


or why is the gravitational force the same as an apparent
acceleration?


See: http://www.amperefitz.com/principle-of-equivalence.htm


Let me know what you think.

KONCHOK.PENDAY

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:00:20 PM12/17/09
to
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:20:50 -0800,
fitz [zeu...@yahoo.com] wrote:

> Why do we have the principle of equivalence
> or why is the gravitational force
> the same as an apparent acceleration?

BECAUSE THEY ARE
EXACTLY THE SAME THING!

ALL MASSES CONSUME AETHER
WHICH THEY CONVERT TO MASS,
THUS MAKING MORE MASS!

THEREFORE THEY LOWER THE
AETHER DENSITY IN THEIR
IMMEDIATE AREA, WHICH
CAUSES THE AETHER TO
FLOW TO THE LOW
DENSITY AREA!

THAT'S CALLED GRAVITY,
WHICH IS AN ACCELERATION.

JUST AS A LOG IS ACELLERATED
[UP TO STREAM-SPEED] WHEN
YOU PUT IT IN A STREAM,
ANYTHING PUT IN A GRAVITY
WELL WILL GO WITH THE FLOW!

BUT THAT STREAM FLOWS
FASTER AND FASTER,
TILL IT ENDS WITH A
THUNK IN MORE MATTER!

WHICH IS, OF COURSE,
JUST CONDENSD AETHER,
KNOWN AS MATTER, WITH
ALL OF IT'S MOMENTUM
AND KINETIC PERFECTLY
PRESERVED IN FASTER,
TINIER VORTICES!

=======================
THIS IS *THE* MASTER
STROKE OF HUMAN GENIUS!
=======================

STEVE BUILDS THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE,
IN *ALL* IT'S PHYSICAL WONDER, FROM
JUST ONE [*VERY* TINY] MOVING PART,
ENDLESSLY REPEATED THRU ALL SCALES!

> See: http://www.amperefitz.com/principle-of-equivalence.htm

> Let me know what you think.

YOU'VE GOT THE RIGHT IDEA

BUT YOU ARE *LOST* IN
ALL THAT RONSENSE MATH,
NO ONE COULD UNDERSTAND!

GET THE PICTURE FIRST!

THEN THE MATH IS EASY!

READ RADO!

BY FAR the BEST book on physics EVER written:
=============================================
AETHRO-KINEMATICS IS THE MAIN RADO TEXT
It�s 527 pages of tightly-reasoned analysis
by the greatest physicist of all time!
http://net-prophet.net/rado-ak/aethro_3.pdf
=============================================

NO BULLSHIT!
I GUARANTEE IT!
JUST HARD-NOSED
SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY!

It�s also the best
history of physics
ever written!

Even better than
Richard McKeon!

But Rado perfectly
illustrates both
McKeon�s analysis
AND PREDICTIONS!

HIS �LEAST PARTICLES�
ANALYSIS IS ONE OF MCKEON�S
FOUR PRIMARY MODES OF THOUGHT!

THE ONE THAT PERFECTLY
HEXPLAINS AND CONSTRUCTS
THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

THAT�S A BIG
DOUBLE WOW-WOW!

CAUTION: *NOT* FOR
the faint of heart!
May be dangerous to
preconceived prejudices!

Steve�s site is:
http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/

My intro to Steve�s work is:
http://net-prophet.net/nobul/rado/rado.htm

See �05* AETHER PHYSICS� in the
right-hand column of my blog at:
http://net-prophet.net/blog/
AND the �PHYSICS� CATEGORY
in the left-hand column!

Also see the �AETHER PHYSICS� TOPIC
under the �2-FORUMS� in the blog PAGES.

That�s the reading list for now,
but �Aethro-dynamics� will be
released ANY DAY NOW!


O
--- )
\


NEWSGROUPS:
alt.ucp,alt.conspiracy,alt.sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories
PERMALINK: http://net-prophet.net/blog/?p=1666

KONCHOK.PENDAY

unread,
Dec 17, 2009, 4:02:59 PM12/17/09
to

thejohnlreed

unread,
Dec 22, 2009, 8:49:50 PM12/22/09
to
On Dec 17, 1:00 pm, "KONCHOK.PENDAY" <K...@net-prophet.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:20:50 -0800,
>
> fitz [zeus...@yahoo.com] wrote:
>
>  > Why do we have the principle of equivalence
>  > or why is the gravitational force
>  > the same as an apparent acceleration?
>
> BECAUSE THEY ARE
> EXACTLY THE SAME THING!
>
> ALL MASSES CONSUME AETHER
> WHICH THEY CONVERT TO MASS,
> THUS MAKING MORE MASS!

jr writes>
Jesus Konchok give it a break. We have the principle because Einstein
made it so. The reason the so called "gravitational force" is the same
as an apparent acceleration is because we guage [ma] and [mg]according
to what we feel. We are the constants of proportionality.
Have a good time
johnreed

KONCHOK.PENDAY

unread,
Dec 23, 2009, 12:05:42 AM12/23/09
to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:49:50 -0800,
thejohnlreed [thejoh...@gmail.com] wrote:

> On Dec 17, 1:00 pm, "KONCHOK.PENDAY" <K...@net-prophet.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:20:50 -0800,
>>
>> fitz [zeus...@yahoo.com] wrote:
>>
>> Why do we have the principle of equivalence or why is the
>> gravitational force the same as an apparent acceleration?

>> BECAUSE THEY ARE
>> EXACTLY THE SAME THING!
>>
>> ALL MASSES CONSUME AETHER
>> WHICH THEY CONVERT TO MASS,
>> THUS MAKING MORE MASS!
>
> jr writes>
> Jesus Konchok give it a break.
> We have the principle because

THEY ARE EXACTLY
THE SAME THING!

GRAVITY IS
ACCELERATION!

> Einstein made it so.

EINSTEIN HAD
NOTHING TO
DO WITH IT!

> The reason the so called "gravitational force" is
> the same as an apparent acceleration is because

THEY ARE THE SAME THING!

> we guage [ma] and [mg]according to what we feel.

???? My guess is that
two examples of the
same thing are quite
likely to feel very
much the same!

> We are the constants of proportionality.

????

Can I use a tennis ball?

> Have a good time
> johnreed

Yes, thank you!

0 new messages