What is the definition of Vacuum?

[x]

What does it mean?
A Space (Volume) where nothing is (What is nothing)?
A Space (Volume) where no materia is?
A Space (Volume) where no ...?

Whats the definition?

can anybody help me?

[Dave]

its a machine that sucks dirt off floors.

"x" <s> wrote in message
news:40d8b3f5$0$24420$91ce...@newsreader02.highway.telekom.at...

[andrewvecsey]

"x" <s> wrote in message news:<40d8b3f5$0$24420$91ce...@newsreader02.highway.telekom.at>...

Hi. Vacuum is what is left over when you remove all electrons,
protons, and nutrons from the universe. You can read my paper
describing the universe with its components and interactions of the
components (forces) modeled in a 3D mechanistic way. It has lots of
pictures and is intuitive to understand. You can find it at
http://www.geocities.com/andrewvecsey/universe.html
regards
andrew vecsey

[G=EMC^2 Glazier]

A vacuum is a void it seems to go with the song "I got plenty of
nothing" Nothing is pushing the Casmir plates together. The nothing of
space energy is said to be 1,000 times greater than all the other
energies of the universe combind Bert

[G=EMC^2 Glazier]

It was the "false " vacuum of space,and the compression force of gravity
that created the first trillionth of the nanosecond implosion of the
start of the big bang. At that spacetime the cosmos was the size of a
proton(my theory) the next trillionth of a second this compressed area
exploded(big bang),and it expanded outward a billion light years(Guth)
It is inflation that rules this spacetime. This is showing us space
energy is at this time stronger than gravity. The very fact that more
space energy is added to the universe only makes gravities overall
universe force weaker and weaker.. still it is gravity that evolved a
universe we have at this spacetime. Nature creates trillions of
universes continually each trillionth of a nanosecond. More universes
than snow flakes in an endless storm. All universes are alike because
the fabric of space is the same,and so is gravity. Like snow
flakes universes are symmetrical,and are spinning as they inflate.
Universes glow with a blood red color as seen from afar. They on average
all contain organic matter(intelligent life) Life is needed so these
universes can see themselves. Without life these universes need not
exist. They would be a waste of time and energy,and nature would have
none of that. Bert

[Eelhouse]

On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:24:10 -0400, herbert...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

>It was the "false " vacuum of space,and the compression force of gravity
>that created the first trillionth of the nanosecond implosion of the
>start of the big bang. At that spacetime the cosmos was the size of a
>proton(my theory) the next trillionth of a second this compressed area
>exploded(big bang),and it expanded outward a billion light years(Guth)

Is this the classical theory ? According to Einstein, *nothing* can
travel faster than c. Expansion of *something* at a speed of 1 Billion
light years in 1 trillionth of a second beggars belief.

Am I missing something here, or has our universe come back from the
future ? :)

[G=EMC^2 Glazier]

Elhouse Universes are continuos. Nature making mini big bangs
continually it is what she does best. Singularities are the snow flakes.
there are more blackhole in the universe by a factor of 95% than all
other mass. Bert

[Eelhouse]

I don't think you answered my question re. faster than light speed of
expansion of the universe and its implications.

Please can you re-read

Thanks

Eelhouse

[߃-- ¹¹]

Basically; It is the superconductive medium, with no atomic
oscillations, of matter, that fills all space with a negative density.
߃--¹¹

[G=EMC^2 Glazier]

The vacuum of space contains waves. It cant be nothingness. What gives
space a structure is what the Casmir plates are showing us. It is wave
energy pushing the two plates together. Bert

[߃-- ¹¹]

I was thinking in terms of the Plasm Cosmology;

http://www.holoscience.com/views/view_plasma.htm

߃--¹¹