\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
The City of Sarasota, FL is fed up with booming car stereos and are
getting tough.
http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/ContentDetail?contentId=7310486
/////////////////////////////
Angelo Campanella
> Dave Fagen (Fagen Acoustical Consultants)
> Contributes this little bit of news:
>
> \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
> The City of Sarasota, FL is fed up with booming car stereos and are
> getting tough.
>
>
> http://www.myfoxtampabay.com/myfox/pages/ContentDetail?contentId=7310486
>
> Angelo Campanella
What sort of cross-country propagation velocity do you think that "fed up
with booming car stereos" wave will have?
> What sort of cross-country propagation velocity do you think that "fed
> up with booming car stereos" wave will have?
Ans:
A convenient formula for the speed of sound in air is
c = 20*sqrt(273 + T), T in Centigrade and c in meters/sec
or
c = 49*sqrt(459 + T), T in Fahrenheit and c in feet/sec
The speed of sound in air at a temperature of 0 degrees C and 50%
relative humidity is 331.6 m/s. The speed is proportional to the square
root of absolute temperature and it is therefore about 12 m/s greater at
20 degrees C. The speed is nearly independent of frequency and
atmospheric pressure but the resultant sound velocity relative to the
ground may be substantially altered by wind velocity.
Angelo Campanella
However, the legislative portion of the wave will take place in
a very dense medium with much inertia and a large dead band.
Some portion of the wave may become imaginary and some
distortion should also be expected.
Later...
Ron Capik [aka: the NJ Editorial Minstrel]
--
Please Explain
Angelo Campanella
I do believe "wondering" was asking about propagation
of the ordinance rather than the sound waves. Thus
his "fed up with booming car stereos" [ordinance] wave
would need to propagate through some legislative medium
such as the one sarcastically described above.
Need I continue?
Later...
Ron Capik
--
Ron Capik wrote:
> Angelo Campanella wrote:
>> Please Explain
> I do believe "wondering" was asking about propagation
> of the ordinance rather than the sound waves. Thus
> his "fed up with booming car stereos" [ordinance] wave
> would need to propagate through some legislative medium
> such as the one sarcastically described above.
The only way topenrtate that medium is byconsistent(rapeated) tries...
Not intense, just repeared from time to time. ventually a light will
turn on in some mindto allow the issue to air.
Angelo Campanella
Thus, in effect, one needs to make noise to reduce noise.
Been there, done that.
Thanks.
Later...
Ron Capik [aka: The NJ Editorial Minstrel]
--