Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
A message for Ole' Kicking, Too Many Tools, Tom Swift, WY The Canuck, MI Wakefield and the good people in general
4 views
Skip to first unread message
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 9, 2012, 12:38:42 AM11/9/12
to
Guys:
I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
-Ramon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
reelected.
You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
do their job.
Tom Swift Sr.
Nov 9, 2012, 7:47:48 AM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 12:38 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
> If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. This guy's mind mind is wasted.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
> If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
-----
-----
Please Note:
In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka
Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the
winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.
We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interruption.
------
------
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 9, 2012, 8:26:35 AM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 6:47 am, "Tom Swift Sr." <thomas.swift.sen...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
> psychotic interruption.
You are more than welcome to hang out A.P.I. We are Buster-Free.
Maybe you can help elevate the level of discourse there, but mainly we
need fresh blood. Currently, we can finish each other's thoughts.
-Ramon
wrote:
> We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
> psychotic interruption.
Maybe you can help elevate the level of discourse there, but mainly we
need fresh blood. Currently, we can finish each other's thoughts.
-Ramon
Tom Swift Sr.
Nov 9, 2012, 8:51:29 AM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 8:26 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 6:47 am, "Tom Swift Sr." <thomas.swift.sen...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
> > psychotic interruption.
> -
> On Nov 9, 6:47 am, "Tom Swift Sr." <thomas.swift.sen...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
> > psychotic interruption.
> You are more than welcome to hang out A.P.I. We are Buster-Free.
alt.politics.immigration? I'll think about it.
It does have its own lot of KOOKs. I wonder if that racist, anti-
immigration reform, Satanic Communist Tani (aka Phyllis) and all her
sockpuppets are still there. Yes, she really calls herself a "Satanic
Communist" -- here is a link about her:
http://www.arcane-archive.org/religion/satanism/church-of-satan/satanism-9701tanicoskd-1.php
She is just as completely clueless as Bobby. I know other Satanists
on Usenet actually denouce her! LOL.
-----
-----
Please Note:
In select newsgroups this post will now be follow by an out-of-date,
cut-and-paste, SHRIEKING ranting and raving by Bob Milby Jr., aka
Patriot Games, aka Buster Norris, aka 1000s of Sockpuppets -- and the
winner of alt.usenet.kook's K00K of the Month Award for September
2012.
We hope to return you to more rational posting after this brief,
psychotic interuption.
------
------
max headroom
Nov 9, 2012, 9:48:21 AM11/9/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in
news:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
> Guys:
> I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
> -Ramon
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
How is this relevant to gun ownership and its political ramifications?
IOW, why are you spamming t.p.g.?
news:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
> Guys:
> I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
> -Ramon
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
IOW, why are you spamming t.p.g.?
Michael A. Terrell
Nov 9, 2012, 10:43:57 AM11/9/12
to
"Tom Swift Sr." wrote:
>
> On Nov 9, 12:38 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> > alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> > From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> > Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> > Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> > Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> > reelected.
> >
> > You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
> > If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> > do their job.
>
> A mind is a terrible thing to waste. This guy's mind mind is wasted.
He has no mind, so he doesn't matter.
Barbarian Mutual
Nov 9, 2012, 11:48:10 AM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 12:38 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
> Guys:
>
>I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>
> -Ramon
>
>I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>
> -Ramon
>Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
>
>If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
Ramon, I still liked Michelle Bachmann's own statement about herself a
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
>
>If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
little better:
"President O'Bachmann"
Too_Many_Tools
Nov 9, 2012, 2:30:41 PM11/9/12
to
More like "If you see a suspicious old fat white racist, report the
SOB."
TMT
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 9, 2012, 3:50:34 PM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 8:49 am, "max headroom" <maxheadr...@localnet.com> wrote:
Mr. Headroom:
I just wanted you and Klaus to read the post in question (below) and
claim that a Liberal/Democrat wrote it, as you always do.
-Ramon
ps: It has been 24 hours and I am still smiling (should I notify the
physician that prescribed the Viagra :-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
I just wanted you and Klaus to read the post in question (below) and
claim that a Liberal/Democrat wrote it, as you always do.
-Ramon
ps: It has been 24 hours and I am still smiling (should I notify the
physician that prescribed the Viagra :-)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
max headroom
Nov 9, 2012, 7:05:12 PM11/9/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in
news:98a26c62-6fe9-450f...@j10g2000yqc.googlegroups.com:
> On Nov 9, 8:49 am, "max headroom" <maxheadr...@localnet.com> wrote:
>> Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote
>> innews:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>> Guys:
>>> I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
>>> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>>> -Ramon
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
>>> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
>>> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> > How is this relevant to gun ownership and its political
> ramifications?
> > IOW, why are you spamming t.p.g.?
> Mr. Headroom:
> I just wanted you and Klaus to read the post in question (below) and
> claim that a Liberal/Democrat wrote it, as you always do.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 9, 2012, 7:43:58 PM11/9/12
to
On Nov 9, 6:15 pm, "max headroom" <maxheadr...@localnet.com> wrote:
No, I am asking you two to take a stance on that post and the
individual who posted it.
-Ramon
individual who posted it.
-Ramon
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 9, 2012, 8:47:48 PM11/9/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Nov 9, 8:49 am, "max headroom" <maxheadr...@localnet.com> wrote:
>> Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote innews:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > Guys:
>> > I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
>> > hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>> > -Ramon
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
>> > alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
>> > From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
>>
>
> > How is this relevant to gun ownership and its political
>ramifications?
> >
> > IOW, why are you spamming t.p.g.?
>
>Mr. Headroom:
>
>I just wanted you and Klaus [..]
You know this is talk.politics.GUNS, right?
>On Nov 9, 8:49 am, "max headroom" <maxheadr...@localnet.com> wrote:
>> Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote innews:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > Guys:
>> > I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
>> > hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>> > -Ramon
>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
>> > alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
>> > From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
>>
>
> > How is this relevant to gun ownership and its political
>ramifications?
> >
> > IOW, why are you spamming t.p.g.?
>
>Mr. Headroom:
>
You know this is talk.politics.GUNS, right?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 9, 2012, 8:48:38 PM11/9/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>No [..]
Yeah.
Now bugger off, you dumb ass.
Yeah.
Now bugger off, you dumb ass.
max headroom
Nov 10, 2012, 3:25:54 AM11/10/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in
news:2a037df9-30d2-4a7b...@m4g2000yqf.googlegroups.com:
Bull. You were trolling and got called out on it.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 12:58:21 AM11/11/12
to
Gentlemen:
Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
your conservative fellow below (and the one above, if it is not too
much to ask). Your readers would appreciate it.
Gracias!
-Ramon
------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics, sci.physics
From: BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:11 pm
Subject: Darwin: Blacks Are Soul Less Apes
The modern negro has an arrested intelligence
on par with a primitive pre-ape. He has a micro
brain and is usually very lazy. The negro is ever
sexualized and known to try and copulate with
white women, cattle, white boys, even zebra's.
An excess of animal hormones, combined with
an IQ that is 3 Standard Deviations below human."
-- Darwin 'On the Negro Stunted Evolution'.
max headroom
Nov 11, 2012, 1:42:58 AM11/11/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in
news:15683bc7-6498-46dd...@r5g2000yqo.googlegroups.com:
This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
Troll elsewhere.
news:15683bc7-6498-46dd...@r5g2000yqo.googlegroups.com:
Troll elsewhere.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 2:46:10 AM11/11/12
to
After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
address a simple question?
I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
-Ramon
max headroom
Nov 11, 2012, 3:43:14 AM11/11/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in
news:609f7fd6-0b4a-487a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
> After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
> limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
> <max...@localnet.com> wrote:
>> This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
> Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
> address a simple question?
Your posting of off-topic threads to t.p.g. (and misc.survivalism) constitutes spamming, so don't be
surprised to be disrespected.
> I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 8:23:04 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>your conservative fellow below
Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
fuckwit?
>Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>your conservative fellow below
fuckwit?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 8:23:57 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
Really, Ramon?
THAT stupid?
Really, Ramon?
THAT stupid?
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 8:54:07 AM11/11/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:609f7fd6-0b4a-487a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
newsgroup(s) for this, and then post it to four newsgroups where it is
utterly irrelevant, I will answer your question.
alt.politics.immigration
(that's a really hard one to figure out)
misc.immigration.usa
(another that seems impossible for Raymond to figure out.)
There, sir, you have been answered. Now take your crap to the appropriate
newsgroups and quite posting it to ones where isn't not relevant.
I don't expect we will see you back here anytime soon. That is, unless your
immigration stance can't stand up to the big boys in the appropriate
newsgroup, then you will probably be back because you couldn't cut it over
there.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 8:54:59 AM11/11/12
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:00:35 AM11/11/12
to
>"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
If he's using the same stance here as he is there, he's getting his
ass whipped.
ass whipped.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 9:05:05 AM11/11/12
to
news:3ibv98pm6g70623u9...@4ax.com...
I think that's a given....he's already a laughing stock over here and it's
not even a relevant topic.
They would probably chop him up and spit him out in little pieces.
Hmmm... which might explain so much about him.
not even a relevant topic.
They would probably chop him up and spit him out in little pieces.
Hmmm... which might explain so much about him.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:06:43 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 7:55 am, "Scout"
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
questions to you in these 3 groups:
alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
Should you try to ignore it, it goes into the guns NG - I can EASILY
disguise the question, adding the word Colt 45, for instance.
The preliminary question was: "Where (in what NG) do you hang out?" or
"Which is the group (other than guns) that you read most frequently?"
-Ramon F Herrera
Usenet and Internet Co-Founder, while at MIT
Co-AUTHOR of the Rules that Regulate Usenet interaction, etiquette and
authority today.
(*) Gracias, Al!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al_Gore_and_information_technology
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
> >><maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>
> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
> >>address a simple question?
>
> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>
> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>
> > Really, Ramon?
>
> > THAT stupid?
>
> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
Okay, due to the lack of collaboration of you folks, I will post my
>
> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>
> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
> >>address a simple question?
>
> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>
> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>
> > Really, Ramon?
>
> > THAT stupid?
>
> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
questions to you in these 3 groups:
alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
Should you try to ignore it, it goes into the guns NG - I can EASILY
disguise the question, adding the word Colt 45, for instance.
The preliminary question was: "Where (in what NG) do you hang out?" or
"Which is the group (other than guns) that you read most frequently?"
-Ramon F Herrera
Usenet and Internet Co-Founder, while at MIT
Co-AUTHOR of the Rules that Regulate Usenet interaction, etiquette and
authority today.
(*) Gracias, Al!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al_Gore_and_information_technology
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 9:20:02 AM11/11/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:4d63660e-cb7c-43fa...@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 11, 7:55 am, "Scout"
> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
>> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
>> >><maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>>
>> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
>> >>address a simple question?
>>
>> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>>
>> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>>
>> > Really, Ramon?
>>
>> > THAT stupid?
>>
>> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
>
> Okay, due to the lack of collaboration of you folks, I will post my
> questions to you in these 3 groups:
>
> alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
Wow.. out of 3 you still managed to pick 2 newsgroups where it's
> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
>> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
>> >><maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>>
>> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
>> >>address a simple question?
>>
>> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>>
>> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>>
>> > Really, Ramon?
>>
>> > THAT stupid?
>>
>> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
>
> Okay, due to the lack of collaboration of you folks, I will post my
> questions to you in these 3 groups:
>
> alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
irrelevant.
From this list the only one were it is relevant is alt.politics
May I suggest, again, you quite dicking around and go to where it really is
relevan, and indeed the SPECIFIC topic for the newsgroup?
alt.politics.immigration
and/or
misc.immigration.usa
We acknowledge again your inability to find relevant newsgroups when left to
your own devices.
....yet you expect us to consider your comments relevant to setting national
policy.
> Should you try to ignore it, it goes into the guns NG - I can EASILY
> disguise the question, adding the word Colt 45, for instance.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:25:28 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Nov 11, 7:55 am, "Scout"
><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
>> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
>> >><maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>>
>> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
>> >>address a simple question?
>>
>> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>>
>> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>>
>> > Really, Ramon?
>>
>> > THAT stupid?
>>
>> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
>
>Okay, due to the lack of collaboration of you folks, I will post my
>questions to you in these 3 groups:
>
> alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
Good boy.
>On Nov 11, 7:55 am, "Scout"
><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> "Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3m9v985g4i7i9jckt...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >>After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
>> >>limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
>> >><maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>>
>> >>Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
>> >>address a simple question?
>>
>> >>I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>>
>> > Are you too stupid to know which newsgroup to ask this question?
>>
>> > Really, Ramon?
>>
>> > THAT stupid?
>>
>> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time ago.
>
>Okay, due to the lack of collaboration of you folks, I will post my
>questions to you in these 3 groups:
>
> alt.politics, alt.rush-limbaugh, misc.survivalism
Now, you just wait until I get over there to answer it.
Be patient.
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:27:10 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 7:54 am, "Scout"
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:609f7fd6-0b4a-487a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
in several forums.
Care to make a statement about those posts? Care to provide any
evidence of racist posts by Democrats or Liberals?
My contention is that when it comes to hate spreading on the Internet,
your side wins by about 2,000 to 0 (okay, maybe 1 or 2).
TIA,
-Ramon
ps: Did I tell you that we Usenet and Internet co-founders reserved
some special privileges for ourselves? We were inspired by the
Founders. Those sets of unwritten rules are know as "Founder
Supremacy"
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
reelected.
You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
do their job.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics, sci.physics
From: BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:11 pm
Subject: Darwin: Blacks Are Soul Less Apes
The modern negro has an arrested intelligence
on par with a primitive pre-ape. He has a micro
brain and is usually very lazy. The negro is ever
sexualized and known to try and copulate with
white women, cattle, white boys, even zebra's.
An excess of animal hormones, combined with
an IQ that is 3 Standard Deviations below human."
-- Darwin 'On the Negro Stunted Evolution'.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:609f7fd6-0b4a-487a...@r6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
> > limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
>
>
> > After I posted the above in FOUR newsgroups (alt.politics, alt.rush-
> > limbaugh, misc.survivalism, talk.politics.guns), "max headroom"
> > <maxh...@localnet.com> wrote:
>
> > > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>
> > Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
> > address a simple question?
>
> > I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> We accept you're too incompetent to be able to figure out the proper
> newsgroup(s) for this, and then post it to four newsgroups where it is
> utterly irrelevant, I will answer your question.
>
> alt.politics.immigration
> (that's a really hard one to figure out)
>
> misc.immigration.usa
> (another that seems impossible for Raymond to figure out.)
>
> There, sir, you have been answered. Now take your crap to the appropriate
> newsgroups and quite posting it to ones where isn't not relevant.
>
> I don't expect we will see you back here anytime soon. That is, unless your
> immigration stance can't stand up to the big boys in the appropriate
> newsgroup, then you will probably be back because you couldn't cut it over
> there.
Hi Scott:
>
> > > This is unrelated to firearms ownership.
>
> > Would you be so kind as to indicate which NG is appropriate for you to
> > address a simple question?
>
> > I asked Mr. Schadenfreude already, but he refused to answer.
>
> > -Ramon
>
> We accept you're too incompetent to be able to figure out the proper
> newsgroup(s) for this, and then post it to four newsgroups where it is
> utterly irrelevant, I will answer your question.
>
> alt.politics.immigration
> (that's a really hard one to figure out)
>
> misc.immigration.usa
> (another that seems impossible for Raymond to figure out.)
>
> There, sir, you have been answered. Now take your crap to the appropriate
> newsgroups and quite posting it to ones where isn't not relevant.
>
> I don't expect we will see you back here anytime soon. That is, unless your
> immigration stance can't stand up to the big boys in the appropriate
> newsgroup, then you will probably be back because you couldn't cut it over
> there.
I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
in several forums.
Care to make a statement about those posts? Care to provide any
evidence of racist posts by Democrats or Liberals?
My contention is that when it comes to hate spreading on the Internet,
your side wins by about 2,000 to 0 (okay, maybe 1 or 2).
TIA,
-Ramon
ps: Did I tell you that we Usenet and Internet co-founders reserved
some special privileges for ourselves? We were inspired by the
Founders. Those sets of unwritten rules are know as "Founder
Supremacy"
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
reelected.
You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
do their job.
Newsgroups: alt.atheism, alt.politics, sci.physics
From: BroilJAB <DesignDen...@wmconnect.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Local: Sat, Nov 10 2012 10:11 pm
Subject: Darwin: Blacks Are Soul Less Apes
The modern negro has an arrested intelligence
on par with a primitive pre-ape. He has a micro
brain and is usually very lazy. The negro is ever
sexualized and known to try and copulate with
white women, cattle, white boys, even zebra's.
An excess of animal hormones, combined with
an IQ that is 3 Standard Deviations below human."
-- Darwin 'On the Negro Stunted Evolution'.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:27:33 AM11/11/12
to
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:29:26 AM11/11/12
to
> > THAT stupid?
>
> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time
ago.
We have a highly applicable saying in Spanish:
>
> I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time
ago.
"Estas rezumando por la herida".
-RFH
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:30:05 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>in several forums.
One of your fellow liberals made the following statement:
"Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round through each
eyeball and one between your front teeth, scan it in and email it back
to you."
I noticed that you, specifically, said nothing to challenge this.
Why? Is this typical behavior for you people?
>
>I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>in several forums.
"Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round through each
eyeball and one between your front teeth, scan it in and email it back
to you."
I noticed that you, specifically, said nothing to challenge this.
Why? Is this typical behavior for you people?
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:32:20 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 8:20 am, "Scout"
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:4d63660e-cb7c-43fa...@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Where are the groups:
- alt.klaus
- alt.scott
- alt.headroom
-Ramon
<me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
> "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in messagenews:4d63660e-cb7c-43fa...@o8g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
- alt.klaus
- alt.scott
- alt.headroom
-Ramon
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:33:57 AM11/11/12
to
"Kdo jinému jámu kopá, sám do ní padá."
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:34:24 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 8:30 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
... the Right, people"
-Moi
wrote:
> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
> >I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
> >time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
> >in several forums.
>
> One of your fellow liberals made the following statement:
>
> "Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round
> through each eyeball and one between your front teeth,
> scan it in and email it back to you."
"The left hates ideas (which is fine!!!)...
>
> >I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
> >time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
> >in several forums.
>
> One of your fellow liberals made the following statement:
>
> "Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round
> through each eyeball and one between your front teeth,
> scan it in and email it back to you."
... the Right, people"
-Moi
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:35:04 AM11/11/12
to
>Where are the groups:
>
> - alt.klaus
> - alt.scott
> - alt.headroom
You claimed to be co-inventor of the internet, didn't you?
>
> - alt.klaus
> - alt.scott
> - alt.headroom
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:36:34 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Nov 11, 8:30 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>> >time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>> >in several forums.
>>
>> One of your fellow liberals made the following statement:
>>
>
> > "Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round
> > through each eyeball and one between your front teeth,
> > scan it in and email it back to you."
No comment? Then you must condone such irrational liberal behavior.
>On Nov 11, 8:30 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>> >I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>> >time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>> >in several forums.
>>
>> One of your fellow liberals made the following statement:
>>
>
> > "Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round
> > through each eyeball and one between your front teeth,
> > scan it in and email it back to you."
>"The left hates ideas (which is fine!!!)...
>... the Right, people"
"People are SUPPOSED to hate ideas - It is called Freedom of Speech."
- Ramon F. Herrera, June 21, 2012
Too_Many_Tools
Nov 11, 2012, 9:41:22 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Don't let Klaus bother you..he is just worried about having to sell
his guns to pay his new taxes under President Reelect Obama.
Laugh..laugh..laugh...
TMT
wrote:
his guns to pay his new taxes under President Reelect Obama.
Laugh..laugh..laugh...
TMT
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 9:43:18 AM11/11/12
to
I am a Google user, performing a search in the archives, and you are
there. We have technology to post into the past!!
Well, several of us are curious about the year 2012.
Care to answer Mr. Herrera's question? Shouldn't you condemn those 2
extremely hateful posts?
For they are, after all, reflecting VERY badly on your party and
conservatives in general.
-Signed: Google Users from the Year 2020
ps: Guns are still around (I was told that I had to include something
like that, or else pay a unrelated post fee. It is VERY easy to avoid
the fee).
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:45:55 AM11/11/12
to
>Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>> Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
>> fuckwit?
>
>Don't let Klaus bother you.
Klaus doesn't bother me. Thanks for your concern.
>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>> Why are you too stupid to know my position, you stupid spamming
>> fuckwit?
>
>Don't let Klaus bother you.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 9:46:47 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>
> > Why are you too stupid to know my position,
> > you stupid spamming fuckwit?
>
>Esteemed Mr. Schadenfreude:
>
>I am a Google user, performing a search in the archives, and you are
>there. We have technology to post into the past!!
>
>Well, several of us are curious about the year 2012.
>
>Care to answer Mr. Herrera's question? Shouldn't you condemn those 2
>extremely hateful posts?
Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem to be
>On Nov 11, 7:23 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>> >"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>> >Would you please take a position, make a statement about the post from
>> >your conservative fellow below
>>
>
> > Why are you too stupid to know my position,
> > you stupid spamming fuckwit?
>
>Esteemed Mr. Schadenfreude:
>
>I am a Google user, performing a search in the archives, and you are
>there. We have technology to post into the past!!
>
>Well, several of us are curious about the year 2012.
>
>Care to answer Mr. Herrera's question? Shouldn't you condemn those 2
>extremely hateful posts?
relieved of that responsibility?
Are you handicapped?
Ramon F. Herrera
Nov 11, 2012, 10:04:02 AM11/11/12
to
On Nov 11, 8:46 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> to be relieved of that responsibility?
Not all. Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
extreme conservatives know -in no uncertain ters- that their behavior
is not tolerated. The future of your party is at stake here.
Additionally, the condemned post must be hateful of PEOPLE (since
hating ideas is fine, we are supposed to hate some ideas - It is human
nature).
Furthermore, if you see a poster insulting another poster (even his
family) you may abstain as well. We do that here all the time.
Something like "I hate Ramon! He is such an imbecile!" falls in that
category.
-Ramon
"The left hates ideas (which is fine!!!)...
... the Right, people" -Moi
wrote:
> Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> to be relieved of that responsibility?
ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
extreme conservatives know -in no uncertain ters- that their behavior
is not tolerated. The future of your party is at stake here.
Additionally, the condemned post must be hateful of PEOPLE (since
hating ideas is fine, we are supposed to hate some ideas - It is human
nature).
Furthermore, if you see a poster insulting another poster (even his
family) you may abstain as well. We do that here all the time.
Something like "I hate Ramon! He is such an imbecile!" falls in that
category.
-Ramon
"The left hates ideas (which is fine!!!)...
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 10:09:01 AM11/11/12
to
>On Nov 11, 8:46 am, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
>wrote:
>
> > Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> > to be relieved of that responsibility?
>
>Not all.
So why is it my job to condemn ANY?
>wrote:
>
> > Why is it my job to condemn all hateful posts when you seem
> > to be relieved of that responsibility?
>
>Not all.
>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>extreme conservatives
Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
Is THAT what you're telling us, Ramon?
Not a single one?
Really?
[chuckle]
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 10:17:39 AM11/11/12
to
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:23:32 AM11/11/12
to
news:7a202168-c8b8-49b0...@b6g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
Please send me a $100 consulting fee and I will tell you were they are.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:24:29 AM11/11/12
to
news:6rdv98549c9bf8ajt...@4ax.com...
Hey, he swept the floors and emptied the trashcans. After all, someone has
to make sure the real brains can get some work done.
to make sure the real brains can get some work done.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:26:51 AM11/11/12
to
news:805e728f-59e3-4ae4...@v3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
<snip>
Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
wrong....you should do so as well?
Seems to me that sort of excuse went out the window for most people with
they were about 6 years old.
You asked for relevant newsgroups.
You've been given them.
Now get thee hence and return no more.
Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
wrong....you should do so as well?
Seems to me that sort of excuse went out the window for most people with
they were about 6 years old.
You asked for relevant newsgroups.
You've been given them.
Now get thee hence and return no more.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:27:57 AM11/11/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
news:ab20dd9f-c694-4535...@j18g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 10:32:14 AM11/11/12
to
>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in message
>news:805e728f-59e3-4ae4...@v3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
************************************************************
>news:805e728f-59e3-4ae4...@v3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> Hi Scott:
>>
>> I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>> time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>> in several forums.
************************************************************
>>
>> I saw a Western movie where they had a long revolver. At the same
>> time, a couple of fellow conservatives of yours placed the posts below
>> in several forums.
>
><snip>
>
>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>wrong....you should do so as well?
>
>Seems to me that sort of excuse went out the window for most people with
>they were about 6 years old.
>
>You asked for relevant newsgroups.
>
>You've been given them.
>
>Now get thee hence and return no more.
>
Raynard is trying to get us to believe that he's capable of watching a
><snip>
>
>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>wrong....you should do so as well?
>
>Seems to me that sort of excuse went out the window for most people with
>they were about 6 years old.
>
>You asked for relevant newsgroups.
>
>You've been given them.
>
>Now get thee hence and return no more.
>
movie AND reading usenet posts at the same time.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 10:33:41 AM11/11/12
to
My Spanish is more rusty than I thought.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:39:08 AM11/11/12
to
news:s5hv989liku9v2o5f...@4ax.com...
Heck, I have questions of whether he can read and breath at the same time.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 10:41:31 AM11/11/12
to
news:r8hv98ht1b2tq3e27...@4ax.com...
Not really. Just him describing himself as puss.
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 11:21:49 AM11/11/12
to
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 11:24:03 AM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>extreme conservatives
>
>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>extreme conservatives
>
>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
others".
How appropriate.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 11:29:36 AM11/11/12
to
"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
news:94kv981u5sbdc1132...@4ax.com...
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 11:33:06 AM11/11/12
to
>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>extreme conservatives
>>
>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
of mental deficiency?
>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>
>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>others".
>
>How appropriate.
Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
"Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round through each
eyeball and one between your front teeth, scan it in and email it back
to you."
Message-ID: <7jd0d7tbu7sm3th4j...@4ax.com>
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>extreme conservatives
>>
>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
of mental deficiency?
>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>
>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>others".
>
>How appropriate.
"Email me a photograph of your face. I will put a round through each
eyeball and one between your front teeth, scan it in and email it back
to you."
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 11:33:16 AM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>
>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>
>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>
>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>
>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
science or math.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 11:33:43 AM11/11/12
to
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 11:34:35 AM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:33:06 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>
>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>
>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>
>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>of mental deficiency?
>
>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>
>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>others".
>>
>>How appropriate.
>
>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
You just can't keep up with the players, even with a program, can you?
>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>
>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>
>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>
>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>
>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>of mental deficiency?
>
>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>
>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>others".
>>
>>How appropriate.
>
>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 11:35:09 AM11/11/12
to
MATH
"You ALWAYS start counting with zero."
-Deep "Euclid" Dudu, 8/11/2012
LANGUAGES
"Can you read moron?"
- Exotic Language Expert Deep Dudu
Message-ID: <jarke79r8c7jesu3r...@4ax.com>
GEOGRAPHY
"The French are MUCH MUCH closer to Libya than anyone."
Geography Expert Deep Dudu
Message-ID: <41m9o6taveo9s4ocq...@4ax.com>
LOGIC
" If you deny being a Republican then you are a Republican liar.
Simple."
-Deep Dudu, King of Logic.
Message-ID: <4gh3685gu519iuuri...@4ax.com>
HISTORY
"You can't counter facts in propaganda because there aren't any."
-Deep Dudu, September 21, 2012
ECONOMICS
"Services provided by the government are BY DEFINITION socialism."
-Deep Dudu
POLITICS
"Socialism IS our form of government, idiot. "
-Dudu
Message-ID: <6iann6dreo7rouhnm...@4ax.com>
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 11:35:59 AM11/11/12
to
>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:33:06 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>>
>>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>>
>>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>>
>>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>>of mental deficiency?
>>
>>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>>
>>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>>others".
>>>
>>>How appropriate.
>>
>>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
>
>You just can't keep up with the players, even with a program, can you?
So you're saying it DOESN'T relate, you just some ass-kicking from
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 08:33:06 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>
>>>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 07:17:39 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
>>><klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>>>
>>>>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>>>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>>>>extreme conservatives
>>>>
>>>>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>>>
>>>You're incredibly stupid, for one thing.
>>
>>Yet I've proven that I know more than you, which would make you even
>>dumber than incredibly stupid. Is there an actual name for your level
>>of mental deficiency?
>>
>>>>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>>>>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>>>
>>>Your Germanic handle literally means "delights in the suffering of
>>>others".
>>>
>>>How appropriate.
>>
>>Um, and that relates to antagonizing nazis like yourself HOW, exactly?
>
>You just can't keep up with the players, even with a program, can you?
Klaus this morning, huh?
[chuckle]
Derek Smalls
Nov 11, 2012, 11:46:51 AM11/11/12
to
"deep" wrote in message news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
So sez the retard that can't count.
Where is your "zero finger", you retard?
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 12:13:21 PM11/11/12
to
news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
Talking to yourself again Dudu?
You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 1:10:57 PM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 06:33:57 -0800, Klaus Schadenfreude
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
<klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>On Nov 11, 7:55 am, "Scout"
>><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > THAT stupid?
>> >
>> > I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time
>>ago.
>>
>>We have a highly applicable saying in Spanish:
>>
>> "Estas rezumando por la herida".
>
>There's an old Czech proverb that says,
>><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>> > > THAT stupid?
>> >
>> > I think he has already proven that quite adequately a LONG time
>>ago.
>>
>>We have a highly applicable saying in Spanish:
>>
>> "Estas rezumando por la herida".
>
>
>"Kdo jinému jámu kopá, sám do ní padá."
ROFLMAO!!
Gunner
--
""The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have
to do is lay out enough silage and they come running. That’s why I
became an operative working with Democrats. With Democrats all you
have to do is make a lot of noise, lay out the hay, and be ready to
use the ole cattle prod in case a few want to bolt the herd.
Eighty percent of the people who call themselves Democrats don’t have
a clue as to political reality.
What amazes me is that you could take a group of people who are hard
workers and convince them that they should support social programs
that were the exact opposite of their own personal convictions. Put a
little fear here and there and you can get people to vote any way you
want.
The voter is basically dumb and lazy. The reason I became a Democratic
operative instead of a Republican was because there were more
Democrats that didn’t have a clue than there were Republicans."
James Carvell, DNC operative
Gray Guest
Nov 11, 2012, 1:21:49 PM11/11/12
to
"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in news:be1e6bb7-1cc6-4f59-
93db-97e...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>
> Guys:
>
> I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>
> -Ramon
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
>
> If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
>
Actually stupid, it means that your compatriots may find themselves
targeted during the coming troubles. Bit what the Hell as long as a great
nation is destroyed, right?
--
Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
93db-97e...@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:
>
> Guys:
>
> I hope you enjoy the post below as much as I have. I read it half an
> hour ago and still can't wipe the smile of satisfaction from my face.
>
> -Ramon
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Newsgroups: alt.politics.immigration, misc.immigration.usa,
> alt.california, ca.politics, misc.survivalism
> From: Anonymous <anonym...@foto.nl1.torservers.net>
> Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 13:29:18 -0500 (EST)
> Local: Thurs, Nov 8 2012 12:29 pm
> Subject: The brown niggers are responsible for Obama getting
> reelected.
>
> You know what that means. Enforcement of immigration laws.
>
> If you see a suspicious Mexican, report the SOB. Make Obama's thugs
> do their job.
>
Actually stupid, it means that your compatriots may find themselves
targeted during the coming troubles. Bit what the Hell as long as a great
nation is destroyed, right?
--
Refusenik #1
Libs suffer from Eleutherophobia. And there is no cure.
Obama called the SEALs and THEY got bin Laden. When the SEALs called Obama,
THEY GOT DENIED. Fuck Obama
max headroom
Nov 11, 2012, 11:51:51 AM11/11/12
to
deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com:
Tomorrow promises to be a banner day for Consolidated Ironymeters.
I wish you'd give us some warning, though-- I was drinking coffee when I read that.
I wish you'd give us some warning, though-- I was drinking coffee when I read that.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 1:27:44 PM11/11/12
to
>"max headroom" <maxhe...@localnet.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
Gee, Steddy Eddy could have made some of his money back if he had only
known.....
known.....
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 2:47:57 PM11/11/12
to
You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
you just don't know how stupid you are.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 11, 2012, 2:53:10 PM11/11/12
to
>On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>
>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>
>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>> science or math.
>>
>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>
>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
It's actually pretty sad that you're so fucking ignorant.
><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that are
>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>
>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>
>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>
>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>> science or math.
>>
>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>
>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>
>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
But it sure is fun to embarrass you!
>You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
>you just don't know how stupid you are.
Too funny.
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 3:42:48 PM11/11/12
to
Monday morning.
max headroom
Nov 11, 2012, 3:46:23 PM11/11/12
to
deep <de...@dudu.org> wrote in news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com:
Ahhh, the Rubber/Glue Gambit. A bit dated, but it would be a bold move if you can pull it off.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 4:52:45 PM11/11/12
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:8grv98l65i7tspr93...@4ax.com...
have 1 million shares and made a ton of money.
After all, he's great at telling people after something happened how he
profited from it.
With 20/20 hindsight like that it's amazing....really.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 4:53:17 PM11/11/12
to
news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com...
Standard Dudu Defense #1
deep
Nov 11, 2012, 5:31:16 PM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:53:17 -0500, "Scout"
you might have learned in kindergarten?
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>>> science or math.
>>>
>>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>>
>>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
>>
>> You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
>> you just don't know how stupid you are.
>
>Standard Dudu Defense #1
>
Figure out yet that our number system starts with zero, despite what
>
>
>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>>> science or math.
>>>
>>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>>
>>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
>>
>> You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
>> you just don't know how stupid you are.
>
>Standard Dudu Defense #1
>
you might have learned in kindergarten?
Gunner
Nov 11, 2012, 7:05:15 PM11/11/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:53:17 -0500, "Scout"
Exclusive: Joseph Farah presents evidence of illegal voting,
contributions, intimidation
Contrary to popular opinion, I am not a “conspiracy theorist.”
I live in the real world – always have. I’ve been a journalist who
goes where the facts lead him all my life – unlike most of my
colleagues whose “facts” are predetermined by their ideology.
Ads by Google
Man Cheats Credit Score1 simple trick & my credit score jumped 217
pts. Banks hate this! www.thecreditsolutionprogram.com
Utility InvestingTrade a Custom Portfolio of up to 30 Utility
Stocks - just $9.95. MotifInvesting.com/UtilityInvesting
I understand Barack Obama and Bill Ayers because I was one of them
early in my life. I even met Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and Tom Hayden
and Jane Fonda in the old days. I admired them. If Obama had been old
enough during the 1960s and 1970s, I probably would have run into him,
too.
If anyone has a balanced approach to the realities of political life
in America, it’s me. I’ve looked at life from both sides. I know the
arguments of the other side and can still spout them before most of
today’s practitioners of so-called “progressive” thought can.
I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement represented so
ably today by Obama is this: “By any means necessary …” It was first
articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, “Dirty Hands.” But it
became popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.
What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means. It means
violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying,
stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie “sins” are
appropriate means of furthering the cause.
Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the reigning
ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?
There is no doubt in my mind.
And that’s why stealing the vote is not only an acceptable practice by
these people, it is a moral imperative in their twisted worldview.
Am I suggesting that the recent presidential election was stolen
through voter fraud and manipulation?
Without a doubt.
Do I have evidence?
Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence to show that it was committed
by one side in the election in various ways. And I am convinced that
at least 5 percent of the Democratic vote can be attributed to fraud –
illegal voters, illegal campaign contributions, rigged balloting,
intimidation at the polls, you name it.
Here’s just some of the evidence for the skeptical:
In September, the Columbus Dispatch in Ohio reported this sad and
ugly news: “More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is
probably ineligible to vote. In two counties, the number of registered
voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s
Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while
in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per
100 eligible. Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90
percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most
voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.
In a close presidential election where every vote might count, which
ones to count might become paramount on Election Day – and in possible
legal battles afterward.” The Dispatch asked Ohio’s chief elections
official, Secretary of State Jon Husted, what could be done about this
problem. His answer? Not enough. Nine months ago, he asked U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder for a personal meeting to discuss how to
balance seemingly conflicting federal laws so he could pare Ohio’s
dirty voter list without removing truly eligible voters. Holder’s
office never even bothered to reply – to either Husted or the
newspaper. What does that tell you? It tells me voter fraud is and was
an important tactic in re-electing Holder’s boss and Democrats
throughout the country. Anyway, we all know how Ohio voted.
How about Michigan – Romney’s home state? How did Obama win such a
resounding victory when the polls showed the two candidates in a
virtual tie? And how is it that Obama won by 9 points while Democrats
suffered a string of defeats down the entire state ballot? For
instance, Republicans maintained control of both the state House and
the Supreme Court, while Democrats lost three ballot propositions.
Then, of course, there is the fine work of James O’Keefe and
Project Veritas, which demonstrated, over and over again on camera,
the willingness and ability of Democratic operatives to cheat and
commit fraud to win elections.
How about WND’s own investigation in which it demonstrated
conclusively that the Obama campaign welcomed foreign contributions by
intentionally leaving vulnerabilities in its web donation page that
allowed even those using bogus names, disposable credit cards and
foreign IP addresses to donate cash? The classic example was when WND
staffers did just this using the name Osama bin Laden, listing his
occupation as “deceased terrorist” and employer as “al-Qaida.” The
contributions were accepted by the Team Obama, just as it accepted
foreign contributions from the Palestinian Authority in 2008, as WND’s
Aaron Klein demonstrated.
How much evidence does one need to be convinced? This is just the tip
of the iceberg.
Did it make a difference in this close race?
Without question.
Is there anything we can do about it now?
Not likely.
But if we want to ensure that America has free and fair elections in
the future, we better get to work. America’s political system is
becoming a thugocracy.
I’m fighting back.
And you can help me in this fight.
I’m challenging the Obama campaign on the acceptance of those illegal
donations. I’ve filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint at
considerable cost. I have no illusions that it will be easy to
challenge a sitting president within his own bureaucracy. But I’m
doing it. Meanwhile, some in the press would prefer that I be charged
with voter fraud for efforts to expose the system. I wouldn’t be a bit
surprised if the Democrat machine tries something like that.
That’s why we need your help.
We’re fighting to preserve America’s freedom here – nothing less.
We’re fighting to preserve the concept of representative government –
elections that actually mean something.
We’re fighting to expose what no other news agency in the world
apparently has an interest in exposing – the dark underbelly of
corruption, fraud and abuse in our political system.
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>>> science or math.
>>>
>>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>>
>>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
>>
>> You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
>> you just don't know how stupid you are.
>
>Standard Dudu Defense #1
>
Did voter fraud swing the election?
>
>
>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>news:v000a8djjneiebd8u...@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 12:13:21 -0500, "Scout"
>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>>>news:pokv985ektqoieddr...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:29:36 -0500, "Scout"
>>>> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>>Raymond are you attempting to suggest because others do things that
>>>>>>>are
>>>>>>>wrong....you should do so as well?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's the conservatives' mantra.
>>>>>
>>>>>So you're claiming Raymond and yourself are conservatives?
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I forget, you don't know any more about ethics than you do about
>>>> science or math.
>>>
>>>Talking to yourself again Dudu?
>>>
>>>You've already shown you know nothing about ethics, science or math.
>>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
>>
>> You know, the really funny thing about you really uneducated types,
>> you just don't know how stupid you are.
>
>Standard Dudu Defense #1
>
Exclusive: Joseph Farah presents evidence of illegal voting,
contributions, intimidation
Contrary to popular opinion, I am not a “conspiracy theorist.”
I live in the real world – always have. I’ve been a journalist who
goes where the facts lead him all my life – unlike most of my
colleagues whose “facts” are predetermined by their ideology.
Ads by Google
Man Cheats Credit Score1 simple trick & my credit score jumped 217
pts. Banks hate this! www.thecreditsolutionprogram.com
Utility InvestingTrade a Custom Portfolio of up to 30 Utility
Stocks - just $9.95. MotifInvesting.com/UtilityInvesting
I understand Barack Obama and Bill Ayers because I was one of them
early in my life. I even met Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn and Tom Hayden
and Jane Fonda in the old days. I admired them. If Obama had been old
enough during the 1960s and 1970s, I probably would have run into him,
too.
If anyone has a balanced approach to the realities of political life
in America, it’s me. I’ve looked at life from both sides. I know the
arguments of the other side and can still spout them before most of
today’s practitioners of so-called “progressive” thought can.
I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement represented so
ably today by Obama is this: “By any means necessary …” It was first
articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, “Dirty Hands.” But it
became popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.
What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means. It means
violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying,
stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie “sins” are
appropriate means of furthering the cause.
Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the reigning
ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?
There is no doubt in my mind.
And that’s why stealing the vote is not only an acceptable practice by
these people, it is a moral imperative in their twisted worldview.
Am I suggesting that the recent presidential election was stolen
through voter fraud and manipulation?
Without a doubt.
Do I have evidence?
Yes, I have plenty of anecdotal evidence to show that it was committed
by one side in the election in various ways. And I am convinced that
at least 5 percent of the Democratic vote can be attributed to fraud –
illegal voters, illegal campaign contributions, rigged balloting,
intimidation at the polls, you name it.
Here’s just some of the evidence for the skeptical:
In September, the Columbus Dispatch in Ohio reported this sad and
ugly news: “More than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is
probably ineligible to vote. In two counties, the number of registered
voters actually exceeds the voting-age population: Northwestern Ohio’s
Wood County shows 109 registered voters for every 100 eligible, while
in Lawrence County along the Ohio River it’s a mere 104 registered per
100 eligible. Another 31 counties show registrations at more than 90
percent of those eligible, a rate regarded as unrealistic by most
voting experts. The national average is a little more than 70 percent.
In a close presidential election where every vote might count, which
ones to count might become paramount on Election Day – and in possible
legal battles afterward.” The Dispatch asked Ohio’s chief elections
official, Secretary of State Jon Husted, what could be done about this
problem. His answer? Not enough. Nine months ago, he asked U.S.
Attorney General Eric Holder for a personal meeting to discuss how to
balance seemingly conflicting federal laws so he could pare Ohio’s
dirty voter list without removing truly eligible voters. Holder’s
office never even bothered to reply – to either Husted or the
newspaper. What does that tell you? It tells me voter fraud is and was
an important tactic in re-electing Holder’s boss and Democrats
throughout the country. Anyway, we all know how Ohio voted.
How about Michigan – Romney’s home state? How did Obama win such a
resounding victory when the polls showed the two candidates in a
virtual tie? And how is it that Obama won by 9 points while Democrats
suffered a string of defeats down the entire state ballot? For
instance, Republicans maintained control of both the state House and
the Supreme Court, while Democrats lost three ballot propositions.
Then, of course, there is the fine work of James O’Keefe and
Project Veritas, which demonstrated, over and over again on camera,
the willingness and ability of Democratic operatives to cheat and
commit fraud to win elections.
How about WND’s own investigation in which it demonstrated
conclusively that the Obama campaign welcomed foreign contributions by
intentionally leaving vulnerabilities in its web donation page that
allowed even those using bogus names, disposable credit cards and
foreign IP addresses to donate cash? The classic example was when WND
staffers did just this using the name Osama bin Laden, listing his
occupation as “deceased terrorist” and employer as “al-Qaida.” The
contributions were accepted by the Team Obama, just as it accepted
foreign contributions from the Palestinian Authority in 2008, as WND’s
Aaron Klein demonstrated.
How much evidence does one need to be convinced? This is just the tip
of the iceberg.
Did it make a difference in this close race?
Without question.
Is there anything we can do about it now?
Not likely.
But if we want to ensure that America has free and fair elections in
the future, we better get to work. America’s political system is
becoming a thugocracy.
I’m fighting back.
And you can help me in this fight.
I’m challenging the Obama campaign on the acceptance of those illegal
donations. I’ve filed a Federal Elections Commission complaint at
considerable cost. I have no illusions that it will be easy to
challenge a sitting president within his own bureaucracy. But I’m
doing it. Meanwhile, some in the press would prefer that I be charged
with voter fraud for efforts to expose the system. I wouldn’t be a bit
surprised if the Democrat machine tries something like that.
That’s why we need your help.
We’re fighting to preserve America’s freedom here – nothing less.
We’re fighting to preserve the concept of representative government –
elections that actually mean something.
We’re fighting to expose what no other news agency in the world
apparently has an interest in exposing – the dark underbelly of
corruption, fraud and abuse in our political system.
Scout
Nov 11, 2012, 7:07:09 PM11/11/12
to
news:ho90a851tgroj3ikb...@4ax.com...
Standard Dudu Evasion #1
I will simply note I never said otherwise. As such Dudu it's your strawman.
Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar system...and
it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
I will simply note I never said otherwise. As such Dudu it's your strawman.
Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar system...and
it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 6:40:45 AM11/12/12
to
Have you figured out how many years in a century yet?
deep
Nov 12, 2012, 7:48:39 AM11/12/12
to
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 19:07:09 -0500, "Scout"
Liar.
>
>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar system...and
>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>
A well known mistake and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
>
>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar system...and
>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 8:08:10 AM11/12/12
to
>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar system...and
>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>
>A well known mistake and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
Really? Tell us when it was "corrected" and document that there is now
>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>
>A well known mistake and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
a "Year Zero."
We both know you'll run away shrieking with your skirt pulled over
your head.
Waiting for that cite.
[chuckle]
Scout
Nov 12, 2012, 8:08:26 AM11/12/12
to
news:lvr1a8t1ch6jb4t1k...@4ax.com...
Ok. Please cite the post where I denied our number system starts with zero.
<insert: Jeopardy.wav>
>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>system...and
>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>
> A well known mistake
You assert it was a mistake, but you haven't shown that.
> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
Really? So when did they have two years that were the same number?
After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
So what year was that?
I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
zero.
So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
<insert: Jeopardy.wav>
>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>system...and
>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>
> A well known mistake
> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
So what year was that?
I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
zero.
So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 8:20:39 AM11/12/12
to
>"Scout" <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
<SNIP?
http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES
Now With Over 274 Documented
Lies, Falsehoods, Fabrications, Distortions, and Deceptions!
<SNIP?
>
>Ok. Please cite the post where I denied our number system starts with zero.
>
><insert: Jeopardy.wav>
>
>
>>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>>system...and
>>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>>
>> A well known mistake
>
>You assert it was a mistake, but you haven't shown that.
>
>> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
>
>Really? So when did they have two years that were the same number?
>
>After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
>
>So what year was that?
>
>I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
>zero.
>So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
Lies added.
>Ok. Please cite the post where I denied our number system starts with zero.
>
><insert: Jeopardy.wav>
>
>
>>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>>system...and
>>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>>
>> A well known mistake
>
>You assert it was a mistake, but you haven't shown that.
>
>> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
>
>Really? So when did they have two years that were the same number?
>
>After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
>
>So what year was that?
>
>I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
>zero.
>So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
http://klaus.webege.com/dudu/dudu.htm
Deep Dudu's FORTRESS OF LIES
Now With Over 274 Documented
Lies, Falsehoods, Fabrications, Distortions, and Deceptions!
deep
Nov 12, 2012, 8:32:37 AM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:08:26 -0500, "Scout"
It was corrected you lying ass, by when we start numbering a new
decade, century, millenia. And you DID take the stance that we start
counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do. I
almost fell off my chair over that one.
decade, century, millenia. And you DID take the stance that we start
counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do. I
almost fell off my chair over that one.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 8:51:21 AM11/12/12
to
Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Why is that?
Because this "correction" only happened in your fevered imagination?
Where is "Year Zero" then, if a "correction was made?
How deep is the hole you've dug yourself NOW?
ROFLMAO
>And you DID take the stance that we start
>counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do. I
>almost fell off my chair over that one.
you hit the ground. Still, considerable head damage obviously took
place, since you never learned to start counting with 1 like the rest
of your class.
Are you sure the rest of the class didn't just beat the shit out of
you?
[chuckle]
Scout
Nov 12, 2012, 8:54:12 AM11/12/12
to
news:ehu1a8p4bn4padq8e...@4ax.com...
So sorry, with no answer we can only acknowledge that you have lied yet
again.
We request that Klaus add this to your list of lies and document it as he
has your other ones.
>>
>>>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>>>system...and
>>>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>>>
>>> A well known mistake
>>
>>You assert it was a mistake, but you haven't shown that.
>>
Still Dudu fails to present any evidence to support his claim.
Another lie?
>>> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
>>
>>Really? So when did they have two years that were the same number?
>>
>>After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
>>
>>So what year was that?
>>
No answer given.
>>I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
>>zero.
>>So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
>>
>>
> It was corrected you lying ass, by when we start numbering a new
> decade, century, millenia.
Sorry, but we count decade, century and millennia by the same method we
always have. They end on a year ending in 0 and begin on a year ending in 1
Some people like to suggest we change it, but that's not been accepted as
official and without a year zero would mean that some decade is only 9 years
long, some century is only 99 years long and some millennia is only 999
years which all contradict the very definition of decade, century and
millennia.
Those that propose we change the end and start dates haven't explained how
we are going to correct these contradictions in the very definition of the
terms, which is probably why it's not official.
But then, as usual, facts don't matter to you and it's simply enough to
assert that's the way it is rather than what the truth is.
> And you DID take the stance that we start
> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
history of our calendar system.
> I
> almost fell off my chair over that one.
Anything that contradicts your claims with facts does that.
again.
We request that Klaus add this to your list of lies and document it as he
has your other ones.
>>
>>>>Oh, and BTW I believe the topic of discussion was our calendar
>>>>system...and
>>>>it does NOT start with a zero much as you would like to claim otherwise.
>>>>
>>> A well known mistake
>>
>>You assert it was a mistake, but you haven't shown that.
>>
Another lie?
>>> and problem corrected for hundreds of years ago.
>>
>>Really? So when did they have two years that were the same number?
>>
>>After all, to correct it you would have to repeat a number for a year.
>>
>>So what year was that?
>>
>>I will simply note that even today our calendar still does NOT have a year
>>zero.
>>So when you claimed it was corrected, you lied.
>>
>>
> It was corrected you lying ass, by when we start numbering a new
> decade, century, millenia.
always have. They end on a year ending in 0 and begin on a year ending in 1
Some people like to suggest we change it, but that's not been accepted as
official and without a year zero would mean that some decade is only 9 years
long, some century is only 99 years long and some millennia is only 999
years which all contradict the very definition of decade, century and
millennia.
Those that propose we change the end and start dates haven't explained how
we are going to correct these contradictions in the very definition of the
terms, which is probably why it's not official.
But then, as usual, facts don't matter to you and it's simply enough to
assert that's the way it is rather than what the truth is.
> And you DID take the stance that we start
> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
history of our calendar system.
> I
> almost fell off my chair over that one.
deep
Nov 12, 2012, 9:15:04 AM11/12/12
to
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:54:12 -0500, "Scout"
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>
>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>
>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>
>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>history of our calendar system.
>
>
See how you lie? No one said anything about ignoring history you
<me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>
>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>
>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>
>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>history of our calendar system.
>
>
dumbass. But it has been corrected. Two different things. We now
understand how we actually start counting with zero in our base ten
system, which they didn't understand 2000 years ago. Typical of a
brainless conservative like you to insist on continuing the mistake
forever. Unfortunately for you you've been left behind by people who
actually learned to count from zero.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 9:22:51 AM11/12/12
to
>On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:54:12 -0500, "Scout"
><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>>
>>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>>
>>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>>
>>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>>history of our calendar system.
>>
>>
>See how you lie? No one said anything about ignoring history you
>dumbass. But it has been corrected. Two different things. We now
>understand how we actually start counting with zero in our base ten
>system, which they didn't understand 2000 years ago. Typical of a
>brainless conservative like you to insist on continuing the mistake
>forever. Unfortunately for you you've been left behind by people who
>actually learned to count from zero.
Yet you can't document this "correction" which took place hundreds of
><me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>>
>>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>>
>>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>>
>>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>>history of our calendar system.
>>
>>
>See how you lie? No one said anything about ignoring history you
>dumbass. But it has been corrected. Two different things. We now
>understand how we actually start counting with zero in our base ten
>system, which they didn't understand 2000 years ago. Typical of a
>brainless conservative like you to insist on continuing the mistake
>forever. Unfortunately for you you've been left behind by people who
>actually learned to count from zero.
years ago, as you claimed.
Why not?
What's stopping you from providing a cite?
I mean, besides the fact that there *is* no cite to provide? Why don't
you just say "everybody knows it" like you usually do?
How come there is no "Year Zero" if the "mistake" has been
"corrected?"
Scout
Nov 12, 2012, 10:30:39 AM11/12/12
to
news:0t02a857i0mfofj68...@4ax.com...
start counting at zero. Except there isn't a Year Zero, and never has been.
>But it has been corrected.
So you claim, but the facts are our calendar works the same now as it always
has, and there still is no Year Zero.
So tell me... since you claim this was corrected.
What 'decade' have they decided was only 9 years long?
What 'century have they decided was only 99 years long?
What 'millennia' have they decided was only 999 years long?
Who are they?
What authority do they have?
Where did they get the power to redefine how long a decade, century and a
millennia is?
What authoritative national or international agency has adopted this
'change'?
When did they do so?
Has it been universally recognized?
Just because you claim some people want to assert there was a Year Zero in
denial of history, doesn't mean this 'change' has any significance much less
legitimacy.
The history is clear. There is NO YEAR ZERO. That hasn't changed, and can't
be changed.
>Two different things.
They are, and you've lied about both.
> We now
> understand how we actually start counting with zero in our base ten
> system,
Really? So where do I find what occurred during Year Zero?
>which they didn't understand 2000 years ago.
So we should ignore history?
> Typical of a
> brainless conservative like you to insist on continuing the mistake
> forever.
I'll take that as a yes, that we should ignore history.....and reality.
Further we continue this 'mistake' because that's how our calendar works. It
always has. Sure that's not necessarily a reason to change it, but it's
either that or ignore the definition of decade, century, millennia, etc.
> Unfortunately for you you've been left behind by people who
> actually learned to count from zero.
IOW, the idiots who either don't know the facts, or don't care about the
facts.
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 08:54:12 -0500, "Scout"
> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>>
>>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>>
>>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>>
>>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>>history of our calendar system.
>>
>>
> See how you lie? No one said anything about ignoring history you
> dumbass.
You did. You claimed it was all a mistake we should ignore, and that we
> <me4...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> And you DID take the stance that we start
>>> counting with one not zero, because that's how kindergartener's do.
>>
>>And the Romans, and even in our Calendar. Which you denied.
>>
>>So who is it that doesn't know what they are talking about?
>>
>>You are the one that claims it's all a mistake and so we can ignore the
>>history of our calendar system.
>>
>>
> See how you lie? No one said anything about ignoring history you
> dumbass.
start counting at zero. Except there isn't a Year Zero, and never has been.
>But it has been corrected.
has, and there still is no Year Zero.
So tell me... since you claim this was corrected.
What 'decade' have they decided was only 9 years long?
What 'century have they decided was only 99 years long?
What 'millennia' have they decided was only 999 years long?
Who are they?
What authority do they have?
Where did they get the power to redefine how long a decade, century and a
millennia is?
What authoritative national or international agency has adopted this
'change'?
When did they do so?
Has it been universally recognized?
Just because you claim some people want to assert there was a Year Zero in
denial of history, doesn't mean this 'change' has any significance much less
legitimacy.
The history is clear. There is NO YEAR ZERO. That hasn't changed, and can't
be changed.
>Two different things.
They are, and you've lied about both.
> We now
> understand how we actually start counting with zero in our base ten
> system,
>which they didn't understand 2000 years ago.
> Typical of a
> brainless conservative like you to insist on continuing the mistake
> forever.
Further we continue this 'mistake' because that's how our calendar works. It
always has. Sure that's not necessarily a reason to change it, but it's
either that or ignore the definition of decade, century, millennia, etc.
> Unfortunately for you you've been left behind by people who
> actually learned to count from zero.
facts.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 10:36:41 AM11/12/12
to
I love how Dudu continues to
o bring this up,
o fling citeless claims with wild abandon,
o get the crap knocked out of him,
o shriek about how everyone is mad except for him,
o slink back to his "fortress," and
o repeat the cycle endlessly.
Truly, a masochist of the highest order.
Of course, he repeats this cycle for just about every subject, now
that I think about it.
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 12, 2012, 10:57:24 AM11/12/12
to
>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>extreme conservatives
>
>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>
>Is THAT what you're telling us, Ramon?
>
>Not a single one?
>
>Really?
>
>[chuckle]
Ramooooooooooooooooooooooooooon!
Anything yet?
[chuckle]
>>Klaus Schadenfreude <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>>"Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote in talk.politics.guns :
>
>>Like the nationwide famous Herrera Challenge, all we need is
>>ONE post from you (and Max and Scott). One in which you let fellow
>>extreme conservatives
>
>What make you think I'm an "extreme conservative?" Show your proof.
>
>Are you telling us that Ramon- self-proclaimed co-inventor of the
>internet- can't find a SINGLE post by Klaus condemning a nazi?
>
>Is THAT what you're telling us, Ramon?
>
>Not a single one?
>
>Really?
>
>[chuckle]
Ramooooooooooooooooooooooooooon!
Anything yet?
[chuckle]
Scout
Nov 12, 2012, 12:06:58 PM11/12/12
to
"Klaus Schadenfreude" <klausscha...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:6272a8dlio1mvog12...@4ax.com...
able to find a post?
Michael A. Terrell
Nov 12, 2012, 7:33:49 PM11/12/12
to
Scout wrote:
>
> Hey, if he can't find appropriate newsgroups, do you really expect him to be
> able to find a post?
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 13, 2012, 10:57:38 AM11/13/12
to
Are you really THAT afraid of taking the Schadenfreude Challenge?
deep
Nov 13, 2012, 12:55:43 PM11/13/12
to
socialists. You think everything bad in the world is socialist and
everything good in the world is fascist, even though you've proven
regularly that you don't even understand the difference.
Derek Smalls
Nov 13, 2012, 1:04:56 PM11/13/12
to
"deep" wrote in message news:oa25a8pucr42dc8p8...@4ax.com...
One in the same, YOU SHOOTER of little girls during Halloween!
Gunner
Nov 13, 2012, 2:21:09 PM11/13/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>socialists.
Nazis ARE Socialists. Just like Democrats,,,or the Far Leftwing
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>socialists.
Extremist Fringe kook variety. Like the ones controlling the DNC
They even push gun control like the Nazis did. Using the same forms
"The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be
reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and
controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced,
if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again
learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
(Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 B.C.)
Derek Smalls
Nov 13, 2012, 2:30:15 PM11/13/12
to
"Gunner" wrote in message
news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>socialists.
Nazis ARE Socialists.
I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!
Gunner
Nov 13, 2012, 3:24:26 PM11/13/12
to
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:30:15 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
Or dont you think its true?
Speak your piece, paleface.
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!
What..you didnt like the backup?
>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!
Or dont you think its true?
Speak your piece, paleface.
Gunner
The methodology of the left has always been:
1. Lie
2. Repeat the lie as many times as possible
3. Have as many people repeat the lie as often as possible
4. Eventually, the uninformed believe the lie
5. The lie will then be made into some form oflaw
6. Then everyone must conform to the lie
Klaus Schadenfreude
Nov 13, 2012, 3:28:50 PM11/13/12
to
Three lies in one post. You're on a roll!
Now With Over 276 Documented
Derek Smalls
Nov 13, 2012, 3:31:30 PM11/13/12
to
"Gunner" wrote in message
news:92b5a890t0lddpj99...@4ax.com...
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:30:15 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
<Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>
>"Gunner" wrote in message
>news:l975a859c00iumsus...@4ax.com...
>
>On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:04:56 -0500, "Derek Smalls"
><Spin...@bass.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>>You don't ever condemn Nazis you lying pig. You simply call them
>>socialists.
>
>
>Nazis ARE Socialists.
>
>>^^^
>
>I did NOT make the statement above, you moron.
>LEARN how to utilize your news reader, you retard!
What..you didnt like the backup?
What back up?
You are a known moron, and I would NEVER want to be associated with the
likes of you, you retard.
Scout
Nov 13, 2012, 4:07:10 PM11/13/12
to
"deep" <de...@dudu.org> wrote in message
news:oa25a8pucr42dc8p8...@4ax.com...
Really Dudu, you should expose your lie in the next sentence, make you look
just stupid, and by that I mean more so than usual.
Scout
Nov 13, 2012, 4:13:55 PM11/13/12
to
"Derek Smalls" <Spin...@bass.gov> wrote in message
news:50a29fc5$0$9804$607e...@cv.net...
and relying on a line of asterisks to indicate your reply isn't a good
practice.
1) The person may not read down far enough to run into your line of
asterisks
2) Some news readers automatically snip everything below a line of asterisks
as part of a signature.
If you are going to continue using Live and think it's a big issue because
others get confused due to the failure of YOUR choice of newsreader, then
may I make a suggestion?
Delete Live V15 from your system. Install Live V14....and everything will
work as it should.
PS...you should even need to restore your settings, files, emails, etc as
they should port over automatically when you install V14 but you should back
them up just in case.
So...until you get your news reader to quote properly, I won't be pointing
fingers.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages