Paula Jones
JJWHITEJR
harassment suit:
Mr. Blumenthal's last index entry under Jones v. Clinton reads
"summary judgment dismissing, 439." The text notes that on getting the
news of Judge Susan Webber Wright's decision while on an African trip,
the president beat on a drum. Mr. Blumenthal adds that during the
White House celebration: " 'It's over!' one of my colleagues shouted.
But I knew it wasn't."
It wasn't. With impeachment proceedings under way, the 8th Circuit
Court heard an appeal of this dismissal, and the president's lawyer
had to inform the courts that the decision was tainted by errors in
the president's testimony. So Mr. Clinton agreed to close the case by
forking over $850,000, though without any apology.
I don't remember the $850,000 anywhere in Mr. Blumenthal's account. I
double-checked all the index entries, and asked an editor to thumb the
pages as well, since Mr. Blumenthal managed to trap one reviewer by
sneaking in a reference to Joseph Lieberman's Senate speech on Clinton
ethics more than 200 pages out of its logical context. Nor do the
index entries on Judge Wright turn up her finding the president in
contempt of court for "intentionally false" testimony that "undermined
the judicial system," or her additional award of more than $90,000 in
resulting expenses to Mrs. Jones and her lawyers. These events need no
explanation or defense; in Mr. Blumenthal's parallel universe they
seem never to have happened.
A look into the parallel universe of Clinton spinmeister Sidney
Blumenthal.
ROBW
camera?
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ed5d6ef...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
Joe S.
She is also the same Paula Jones whose two star witnesses, Arkansas state
troopers, later recanted their stories.
She is the same Paula Jones who lived in Palm Springs, CA, drove a Mercedes,
and wore designer sweat suits to her health club -- although she and her
husband were both unemployed. It helps to have rich friends who hate Bill
Clinton and who are willing to support you as long as you lie. Of course,
they dumped her as soon as the election was over.
--
----
Regards,
Joe S.
----
"ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:mfScncIzb90...@comcast.com...
z
Yes, the Republicans having lost in their bid to score a legal or
'moral' victory, in the end the more highly focused last ditch attempt
by the law firm to at least get some money out of the case by simply
dragging Clinton repeatedly into court until he pays them to go away
proves successful; 'Clinton spinmeister' Blumenthal fails to realize
how important that is to the witchhunters.
'Mrs. Jones' husband, Stephen, told The Washington Times Clinton could
end the entire matter with only a few words and no monetary damages.
"Zero dollars to us and the words, 'I was there. I was wrong. I'm
sorry,'" he said.
[Jones' lawyer Donovan] Campbell said Jones would still be open to a
proposed settlement, but there was "nothing on the table."
John Whitehead, head of the Rutherford Institute, said the institute
would continue to pay Jones' legal bills. He said so far that the
conservative group had spent over $300,000 on "legal expenses," which
did not include attorneys' fees.
There has been friction between lawyers from the Dallas law firm that
has been representing Jones, the Rutherford Institute, and Susan
Carpenter McMillan, who has acted as Jones' spokeswoman and adviser.
The current lawyers have been unhappy with the public and frequent
statements McMillan has made on Jones' behalf.
In a statement released Thursday afternoon, McMillan's reduced role in
the future proceedings was clearly delineated. "Susan Carpenter
McMillan is, and remains, Mrs. Jones' friend. Except for a brief
period of less than 30 days last fall, however, Ms. Carpenter McMillan
has never been Mrs. Jones' legal agent or spokesperson, and that
relationship will not change."
And in another signficant change that Jones' lawyers demanded their
client agree to, it was announced that "to better coordinate questions
and responses with the legal effort, all signficant media inquiries to
Mrs. Jones, Ms. Carpenter McMillan or the Rutherford Institute will be
cleared through the Rader, Campbell, Fischer and Pike Law Offices."
The latest guidelines seem to be in place, as McMillan has already
canceled scheduled appearances on two CNN programs.'
-cnn, 4/16/1998
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>Is this the same Paula Jones who posed on all fours with her arse to the
>camera?
I don't bye those kinds of publiations, so I have know idea what you
are talking about!
JJWHITEJR
"Our new Constitution is now established, and has an
appearance that promises permanency; but in this world nothing can be
said to be certain, except death and taxes." --Benjamin Franklin
qwerty
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 02:34:53 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Is this the same Paula Jones who posed on all fours with her arse to the
> >camera?
>
> I don't bye those kinds of publiations, so I have know idea what you
> are talking about!
You missed Paula Jone's interview & her nude "spread" in Penthouse Magazine?
I guess she did that to restore her "honor"! Wasn't that the reason she
gave at her press conference when she first filed her law suit? To restore
her "honor"? Didn't she also promise to donate any money she received as a
result of that suit to charity? So what charity did she donate her
settlement? After all, it was all about restoring her "honor" and wasn't
about money, right?
.BitHead.
wrote:
>Is this the same Paula Jones who posed on all fours with her arse to the
>camera?
And that matters, how?
----
_____________________________________________________________
/BitHead's Place: Political commentary from the REAL world. /\
/ http://home.rochester.rr.com/bitheads/ _/ /\
/Bit's weekly commentaries also available internationally: / \/
/ http://www.rightpoint.ca/ \ /
http://greysanctuary.com/columnists/bithead/index.asp /\
____________________________________________________________/ /
____________________________________________________________\/
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
ROBW
Ask them.
Loser.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ed72b8b...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
You've got a reason she did it?
I'd love to hear it.
Now that you've "puffed up" and jumped in.
C'mon, tell us how many sexual agreement victims end up posing
nude?
Moron.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
".BitHead." <bit...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:25fgdvc50tna79i5s...@4ax.com...
Lenscap1
is your politics swaying your interpretation ?
ROBW <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:qMCdnXCWaMo...@comcast.com...
George Washington
> harassment suit:
> A look into the parallel universe of Clinton spinmeister Sidney
> Blumenthal.
Another JJ UNDOCUMENTED "article".
George Washington
> On Fri, 30 May 2003 02:34:53 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >Is this the same Paula Jones who posed on all fours with her arse to the
> >camera?
>
> I don't bye those kinds of publiations, so I have know idea what you
> are talking about!
>
Sure you don't....I don't bye them there publiations either..............but
you certainly DO know what he's talking about, JJ.
George Washington
"qwerty" <nos...@all.com> wrote in message
news:HXTBa.134$t54.4...@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com...
She donated the money she got from Penthouse to restore her NOSE!!
George Washington
>
> You've got a reason she did it?
> I'd love to hear it.
> Now that you've "puffed up" and jumped in.
>
> C'mon, tell us how many sexual agreement victims end up posing
> nude?
>
> Moron.
>
> robw
Only the rightwing fundamentalist Christian ones do....Paula Jones, Jessica
Hahn.....
George Washington
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Vf1Ca.180819$ja4.9...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> as a man of art, you actually consider that type pose to be pornographic?
or
> is your politics swaying your interpretation ?
>
Art is art, sleaze is sleaze. No, Paula Jones' body is most certainly NOT
art.
qwerty
"George Washington" <__________@_____.____> wrote in message
news:q54Ca.21407$pu4....@news1.east.cox.net...
Actually, it's more like she "restored" her breasts and did some
"demolition" on the nose!
George Washington
> >
> > She donated the money she got from Penthouse to restore her NOSE!!
>
> Actually, it's more like she "restored" her breasts and did some
> "demolition" on the nose!
Hahahaha!! I like your style....
ROBW
Nice try.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:Vf1Ca.180819$ja4.9...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
Lenscap1
influencing your interpretation...
ROBW <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:KhWdnXFTu7R...@comcast.com...
Lenscap1
difference between what is "art' and what is "sleaze"...
George Washington <__________@_____.____> wrote in message
news:sh4Ca.21553$pu4....@news1.east.cox.net...
George Washington
> ummm...I see...so a persons body type is what you consider the line of
> difference between what is "art' and what is "sleaze"...
ummm, no. But a woman who professes to be spiritual, virtuous and innocent
doesn't pose with her legs splayed apart for the highest bidder.
If you read above, you'll also note that I didn't comment on her "body
type"!
Lone Haranguer
I think she is going to troll for Bill again. He bit once.....
LZ
Lone Haranguer
ROBW wrote:
>
> Neither Paula nor the publication were doing it for artistic reasons.
But you applaud a crucifix in a jar of urine as art?
>
> Nice try.
>
Your tastes are impeccable. You probably gargled with it too.
LZ
ROBW
I saw a woman who didn't get the big payday the people who convinced her to
sell out promised, and realised that somebody was going to have to pay for
that cosmetic surgery.I believe that she would have trouble spelling the
word "art" if you told here about the
"a" and "t"
Tell me, if a woman accused you of sexual harassment, and subsequently posed
naked in a "lower rent" skin mag..........??
Just a thought.
And art is politics.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:WplCa.106142$cO3.7...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
ROBW
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:UtlCa.106146$cO3.7...@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
ROBW
no clue.
But that's your poster girl!
Display it proudly in your room.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDA9EF9...@direcway.com...
George Washington
No he didn't - that's why she settled. And I guess your wife "settled" as
well, she married you.
Lenscap1
George Washington <__________@_____.____> wrote in message
wrote it...guess I'm supposed to read between
> the lines and 'understand' your esoteric interpretations...nice try
though...
Lenscap1
agreed...I was being TOO specific...it's Paula Jones herself he
detests...thanks for supporting my point...
ROBW <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:lsmcnY6TTa9...@comcast.com...
Lenscap1
"sex victims don't normally do porno poses"...based on that, I assume you
view the image of a female nude, whether it be in marble, copper, ceramic,
print or video to be pornographic...
just a thought...
ROBW <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:z2SdnRC4pYE...@comcast.com...
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>If you see the pose as being art, I have no problem with that.
>
>I saw a woman who didn't get the big payday the people who convinced her to
>sell out promised, and realised that somebody was going to have to pay for
>that cosmetic surgery.I believe that she would have trouble spelling the
>word "art" if you told here about the
>"a" and "t"
>
>Tell me, if a woman accused you of sexual harassment, and subsequently posed
>naked in a "lower rent" skin mag..........??
>
>Just a thought.
What does one have to do with the other?
You are saying that if a woman poses for one of these " "lower rent"
skin mag" as you put it, then it's not possible to sexually harass
her?
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>If you are comparing Serrano to a has been whore
When was she accused of prostitution?
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
Lone Haranguer
ROBW wrote:
>
> If you are comparing Serrano to a has been whore posing for money, you have
> no clue.
Serrano is a has been whore who posed a crucifix in a jar of urine for
money. Taxpayer money.
If you consider that art you are from another galaxy.
>
> But that's your poster girl!
> Display it proudly in your room.
Probably looks better than your roommate's poses. Has she done any for
Hustler?
George Washington
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > If you are comparing Serrano to a has been whore posing for money, you
have
> > no clue.
>
> Serrano is a has been whore who posed a crucifix in a jar of urine for
> money. Taxpayer money.
And you're a has been who murders not even for the money but for the fun of
it. Sad, truly sad. You, McVeigh and Koresh will make great roommates
where you all wind up.
Lone Haranguer
So why did Bill settle if he didn't bite?
My wife was a 19 year old bride and I was the 20 year old groom.
Neither of us wanted to wait around for second choice. 48 1/2 years and
counting.
What did you settle for? On second thought, don't tell us.
LZ
ROBW
It was a scorned woman trying to pay for a nose job.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:xQECa.183417$ja4.9...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
ROBW
Kathy Acker, to name but a few) who could have done that pose and it would
have been justified as art.
But the one thing all those women would have done, was assume that pose as
aggressor, not victim as Paula did. Paula was a woman "used" at that point.
The settlement money wasn't what she thought and her "friends" on the other
side were done with her. It was a desperate call. That wasn't art, it was a
payday.
For that, she is a whore.
I'm not saying that's bad, but call it what it is.
And it's not art.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lenscap1" <fs...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:48FCa.183432$ja4.9...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
ROBW
You loose your job.
Sometime later, you see her posing in a mag, arse to camera.
You;re not showing that to your old employers?
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3edb1148...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
You're both old and have no clue.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDBC64A...@direcway.com...
ROBW
Would you have felt better if I had said "slut."?
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3edb135e...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
Lone Haranguer
We need 4 for double deck pinochle. Got any other candidates?
BTW, I was getting paid $99/month in Korea+flight pay which I think was
$45 in those days.
Free .50 caliber ammo though. Unlimited.
Hell of a deal.
LZ
JJWHITEJR
what does the picture matter?
Again one incident has nothing to do with the other.
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:07:00 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
wrote:
Lone Haranguer
comprehension level is exactly the same.
LZ
ROBW wrote:
a>
eflorack
> Talking to you about anything is like talking to a baboon. The
> comprehension level is exactly the same.
That's overly harsh.
The comprehnesion level of most baboons is far and away above what he
constistantly demonstrates.
ROBW
The picture speaks volumes.
And you know it.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3edca6a0...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDCD556...@direcway.com...
ROBW
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDD2F9A...@direcway.com...
ROBW
I notice your mouth is normally open.
No need, I'm not Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly,etc.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"eflorack" <eflo...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:bd154db5.03060...@posting.google.com...
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>If a whore seduces you, you just take it on the chin?
There you go again changing the subject. You were talking about sexual
harassment not seduction. I said if I am guilty of sexual harassment,
then the picture has no meaning. You can't answer that so you change
the subject. Cute but, still just your normal dodging.
>
>The picture speaks volumes.
Only to a bigoted chauvinist.
Lone Haranguer
ROBW wrote:
>
> Who cares?
About Serrano? Good point. Nobody.
LZ
Lone Haranguer
LZ
ROBW
and say you made unwanted advances, she has a great chance of winning the
case.
If that happened to you and you lost your job, wouldn't you freak if you saw
her arse to camera in a skin mag some time later?
Wouldn't you want some kind of retribution and to be re-installed at work?
You weren't guilty but you paid the price for the actions of a whore.
Get it now?
And I'm going to tell you, from my experiences, I have had to represent my
company enough times through the years at prelim hearings (and observed
other cases) to know that the complainant almost always wins.
I felt really bad for one guy because I know she lead him on, and then shut
it down. Dhe made the complaint and won.
The guy lost everything, job, family.........I remember how devastated he
was listening to her give a deposition.
And I knew the girl was a phony because she tried it on me, but I was smart
enough to politely blow her off.
Paula Jones is/was a whore.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3edefd4a...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
Oh, the next time you have a piece displayed at the "Whitney" let us know.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDFEEF2...@direcway.com...
ROBW
They get longer and more exaggerated with every telling.
And we get impressed less and less, if we ever were at all.
You make it sound like I have some reverence for your past.
Uh, no.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EDFEF40...@direcway.com...
JJWHITEJR
sexual harassment not seduction. I said if I am guilty of sexual
harassment, then the picture has no meaning. You can't answer that so
you change the subject. Cute but, still just your normal dodging.
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
Lone Haranguer
ROBW wrote:
>
> If you have a woman who is a fellow worker seduce you and then turn around
> and say you made unwanted advances, she has a great chance of winning the
> case.
> If that happened to you and you lost your job, wouldn't you freak if you saw
> her arse to camera in a skin mag some time later?
> Wouldn't you want some kind of retribution and to be re-installed at work?
>
Why? She trolled and you bit. You played the game but can't take the
consequences.
If Clinton had any ethics, he would never have ended up in that
position.
I've been propositioned by many women. If I give in to the temptation,
whose fault is it?
> You weren't guilty but you paid the price for the actions of a whore.
We don't know how guilty he was. Why did he ask her to come to his
hotel room?
For a smart guy he sure was stupid. Anyone with a brain knows you never
meet a propositioner without witnesses present.
>
> Get it now?
>
> And I'm going to tell you, from my experiences, I have had to represent my
> company enough times through the years at prelim hearings (and observed
> other cases) to know that the complainant almost always wins.
> I felt really bad for one guy because I know she lead him on, and then shut
> it down. Dhe made the complaint and won.
> The guy lost everything, job, family.........I remember how devastated he
> was listening to her give a deposition.
>
> And I knew the girl was a phony because she tried it on me, but I was smart
> enough to politely blow her off.
>
And he could have done the same thing.
> Paula Jones is/was a whore.
>
What does it change? She trolled, Clinton bit. Had he not invited her
to his hotel room, there would have been no case.
If a fish gets caught, why blame the bait?
LZ
ROBW
into a camera sometime later.
You're taking that?
In your case, I imagine you do.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ee05b5b...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EE15D60...@direcway.com...
bobbyhaqq
> consequences.
>
> If Clinton had any ethics, he would never have ended up in that
> position.
>
> I've been propositioned by many women. If I give in to the temptation,
> whose fault is it?
>
> > You weren't guilty but you paid the price for the actions of a whore.
>
> We don't know how guilty he was. Why did he ask her to come to his
> hotel room?
>
> For a smart guy he sure was stupid. Anyone with a brain knows you never
> meet a propositioner without witnesses present.
>
What amazes me is that after Sept 11 2001, with Bin Laden still free
and what ever the nature of his organization, we still don't know, he
is able to kill Americans to this day; with American troops being
killed regularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, you can concern yourself
with Clinton's sex life.
The US is in one of the fights of its life. Maybe you didn't notice
but Al Qaeda is still operative and active, and we just wasted
billions of dollars and thousands of men to take out what was likely
the only nation in the region without active Al Qaeda presence and
cells.
Wake up and get a grip. We have a war to win here. I know that Bush
has decided not to mention the name of the enemy and to talk about the
war as little as possible, but it continues.
Lone Haranguer
month. AF pension, VA disability (from the same money though) SS Direct
Deposit. A pipeline to your pocket.
A piece at the Whitney? I'd sooner have the love and respect of my
family ANY TIME.
LZ
Lone Haranguer
ROBW wrote:
>
> War stories from old men are like Babe Ruth homers.
> They get longer and more exaggerated with every telling.
How would you know? There are only cowards in your bloodline.
>
> And we get impressed less and less, if we ever were at all.
>
Good, because they are not designed to impress, merely to acquaint you
with things you never experienced yourself.
> You make it sound like I have some reverence for your past.
I'm sure these tales give you the drizzlies. Draft dodgers usually
slither from any location where heroes might appear.
> Uh, no.
>
We'll let history judge whose contributions had merit. As far as I am
concerned, I have already received all the reward due me. Just one chat
with a grateful Korean who realizes my sacrifices made his life possible
is reward enough.
Get any calls lately thanking you for dodging the draft?
<snicker>
Let us know when you do.
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>Idiot.
>
>robw
This is ROBW at his best. When is loses the discussion he calls you a
name. The kids on the play ground never change
ROBW
I back down from nothing.
Now please tell us how you would feel if you lost your job to a woman who
would eventually pose naked in a skin mag.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ee1cabe...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
non-bidded contracts to Busch buddies, etc.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"bobbyhaqq" <rhook...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:689922c7.03060...@posting.google.com...
ROBW
that you said they were "chicken feed."
And you might want to do a little research about the "Whitney" o great
curator of the world.
"The love and respect of my family."
What a nitwit.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EE1F20E...@direcway.com...
ROBW
You could tell stories about elephant hunting and I'd be just as impressed.
Which means really not at all.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EE1F46B...@direcway.com...
JJWHITEJR
wrote:
>Let's discuss.
>I back down from nothing.
>
>Now please tell us how you would feel if you lost your job to a woman who
>would eventually pose naked in a skin mag.
As I have said before one has nothing to do with the other. You are
the one with the problem not me.
ROBW
waif that she was made out to be?
I would see that as the only reason as to why you seem not to want
to answer my question.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ee309ba...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
Jim Alder
news:XeKdnUCSb59...@comcast.com:
> Let's discuss.
> I back down from nothing.
>
> Now please tell us how you would feel if you lost your job to
> a woman who would eventually pose naked in a skin mag.
>
> robw
Here you have the "compleat" Robw, JJ. I hope you didn't
expect anything more? He tosses around slanderous statements about
a victim of Clinton's sociopathology, pretending he's asking
questions. You respond and he calls you an idiot. When you point
out his duplicitous cowardice, he asks the same question again,
ignoring the fact that you already responded. He is and always has
been a lame-ass lightweight. Don't know why you bother.
--
Can you hear me now? Good!
Jim Alder
news:3ee309ba...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net:
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 22:46:49 -0400, "ROBW"
> <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>Let's discuss.
>>I back down from nothing.
>>
>>Now please tell us how you would feel if you lost your job to
>>a woman who would eventually pose naked in a skin mag.
>
> As I have said before one has nothing to do with the other.
> You are the one with the problem not me.
>
> JJWHITEJR
You could also mention that Paula Jones did not pose for a
skin mag. She posed for a boyfriend who later betrayed that trust
and sold the pics (which were not naked, by the way) to a skin
mag.
Jim Alder
news:689922c7.03060...@posting.google.com:
> Lone Haranguer <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
> What amazes me is that after Sept 11 2001, with Bin Laden
> still free and what ever the nature of his organization, we
> still don't know, he is able to kill Americans to this day;
> with American troops being killed regularly in Iraq and
> Afghanistan, you can concern yourself with Clinton's sex life.
What amazes me is that no matter what topic is brought up on
this or any other newsgroup, it seems there is always someone who
wants to wail "But Bush hasn't killed bin Laden yet!!"
> The US is in one of the fights of its life. Maybe you didn't
> notice but Al Qaeda is still operative and active, and we just
> wasted billions of dollars and thousands of men to take out
> what was likely the only nation in the region without active
> Al Qaeda presence and cells.
Just training camps for terrorists. Salman Pak? Remember?
Entire airplane on site for training purposes?
And maybe YOU didn't notice that terrorist activity is down in
the past year.
> Wake up and get a grip. We have a war to win here. I know
> that Bush has decided not to mention the name of the enemy and
> to talk about the war as little as possible, but it continues.
Get a grip? Heal thyself.
JJWHITEJR
understand?
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 20:46:54 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
wrote:
George Washington
>> >
> >"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:3ee309ba...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
> >> As I have said before one has nothing to do with the other. You are
> >> the one with the problem not me.
You're the one posting this tripe day after day after day. So, one would
logically conclude that it is YOU who has the problem. Otherwise you'd let
the thing die a natural death (half a decade ago, perhaps?) - but no - your
obsession with Clinton and his penis forces you to continually dwell on it.
Clinton isn't president any more, nothing you do or say is going to change
that. Why do you still obsess over it? Rather, you should be scrutinizing
the pitiful job our current "president" is doing - there is something we CAN
do about that - and we will overwhelmingly in less than two years.
DJ
> > >> the one with the problem not me.
>
> You're the one posting this tripe day after day after day. So, one would
> logically conclude that it is YOU who has the problem. Otherwise you'd let
> the thing die a natural death (half a decade ago, perhaps?) - but no - your
> obsession with Clinton and his penis forces you to continually dwell on it.
>
> Clinton isn't president any more, nothing you do or say is going to change
> that. Why do you still obsess over it? Rather, you should be scrutinizing
> the pitiful job our current "president" is doing - there is something we CAN
> do about that - and we will overwhelmingly in less than two years.
Hear, hear!
Ditto.
DJ
--
ROBW
might not be all that "harassed" by a governor who pulls out his cock"?
Ever think that maybe it was consensual at the time, and conveniently not
afterwards? This chick has proven she'll do most anything for a buck
(remember "Celebrity Boxing"?)
A little right wing, religious money to try and pull down an
administration............
You still wanna debate this?
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ee48d42...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
turning around (literally) and posing nude?
The photo shoot was a fact.
Her involvement with "Celebrity Boxing" was a fact.
Perhaps you can answer the questions that JJ couldn't.
You puffed up.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9395962ED73Ej...@216.168.3.44...
ROBW
The pose was all fours, pussy to camera.
Very naked.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns93959DD582D0j...@216.168.3.44...
George Washington
Here's the REAL story (for those still examining their own hemorrhoids).
Once cold, hard cash was offered, she opened herself to the WORLD for it!
http://www.celebritysexnews.com/newsitems/paulajones.shtml
(October 8, 2000) Paula Jones, that mousy little thing who unwittingly
started the impeachment ball rolling when she accused Bill Clinton of sexual
harrassment back in 1994, will reportedly make a liar out of herself by
appearing naked in the December issue of Penthouse magazine. As recently as
last May, Jones was vehemently denying she would pose nude, telling Fox News
"I will never pose nude for any men's magazine. Never! And that's all I have
to say about that."
Jones came to fame and started our national obsession with the presidential
member when she alleged that Clinton, while governor of Arkansas, had state
troopers bring her to his Little Rock hotel room, where he exposed himself
and came on to her. She supported her claim with testimony stating his penis
had "distinguishing characteristics." Clinton's penis, we learned, was as
bent as the man himself. Democrats took notice that it supposedly leaned to
the right.
According to The New York Daily News, Jones's Penthouse photo layout was
shot in California during the Democratic National Convention. It shows Jones
naked in and next to a swimming pool, with two photos displaying what the
News coyly refers to as "full exposure." The spread is accompanied by an
article entitled "Paula Jones Uncovered! She Shows All, She Tells All: How
the Far Right Used and Abused Her to Destroy Clinton."
Of course this actually marks Jones's second appearance in Penthouse, which
back in 1994 ran a series of grainy black-and-white photos taken by former
boyfriend Mike Turner. Presumably, Paula's massive cosmetic surgery in 1998,
coupled with Penthouse lighting and makeup expertise, will make the new pics
a bit easier on the eyes.
George Washington
> rhook...@hotmail.com (bobbyhaqq) wrote in
> news:689922c7.03060...@posting.google.com:
>
> > Lone Haranguer <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
>
> > What amazes me is that after Sept 11 2001, with Bin Laden
> > still free and what ever the nature of his organization, we
> > still don't know, he is able to kill Americans to this day;
> > with American troops being killed regularly in Iraq and
> > Afghanistan, you can concern yourself with Clinton's sex life.
>
> What amazes me is that no matter what topic is brought up on
> this or any other newsgroup, it seems there is always someone who
> wants to wail "But Bush hasn't killed bin Laden yet!!"
Not the point - what is this massive obsession with Clinton's penis??????
The point above was that there are much more important things to worry about
in this world than the penis of an ex-president. That won't change
anything - let's look at what's going on today and fix that rather than try
to uns-stain the blue dress and re-inject Clinton's sperm back into his
gonads. IT'S OVER!!!! Move on!
Jim Alder
news:IycFa.381$ou....@news1.east.cox.net:
>
> "Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9395B9E49CB1j...@216.168.3.44...
>> rhook...@hotmail.com (bobbyhaqq) wrote in
>> news:689922c7.03060...@posting.google.com:
>>
>> > Lone Haranguer <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > What amazes me is that after Sept 11 2001, with Bin Laden
>> > still free and what ever the nature of his organization, we
>> > still don't know, he is able to kill Americans to this day;
>> > with American troops being killed regularly in Iraq and
>> > Afghanistan, you can concern yourself with Clinton's sex
>> > life.
>>
>> What amazes me is that no matter what topic is brought up on
>> this or any other newsgroup, it seems there is always someone
>> who wants to wail "But Bush hasn't killed bin Laden yet!!"
>
> Not the point -
My point exactly.
> ... what is this massive obsession with Clinton's
> penis??????
We'll get back to that when you can tell me where those billing
records were hiding.
Jim Alder
news:0judneRQJ8D...@comcast.com:
> Are you kidding me?
> The pose was all fours, pussy to camera.
> Very naked.
And a nice photo it was.
http://www.celebritysexnews.com/newsitems/paulajonesph.shtml
And on this spot on this date, robbie was right and I was
wrong.
> You have no idea what you're talking about.
You're right, I didn't. Now do your little voctory dance - this
must bea big day for you.
From now on when it comes to Celebrity Sex News Dot Com, I will
bow to your expertise. I don't recall ever hearing about this
second layout.
JJWHITEJR
Cute, kids on the playground never change.
JJWHITEJR
All the News we make up and phone in, accurate - shmaccurate at lest
we're diverse. -- The New York Times
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003 22:46:26 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
wrote:
ROBW
I'll do it..........but then it's your turn.
Think carefully, my friend.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"JJWHITEJR" <jjwhit...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3ee59b94...@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
ROBW
in a cave or denial.
And if I danced every time I punked one of you wankers, I'd have sore feet.
Being right is it's own reward.
GASOLINE
PERFECT
DANGER
YOURSELF
COPIES
TV
ARMED
COINS
BANGBANG
25 cents
Hail to the Thief
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9396113D3667D...@216.168.3.44...
Lone Haranguer
inviting her to his room, she had absolutely no case. Bill did this to
himself just because he couldn't resist some twitching ass.
That is how women get husbands, fur coats, diamond rings, etc. In her
case she decided Bill's weenie was too small or didn't look tasty so she
turned his offer down. Maybe it was because he was crass and klutzy and
had no class. Later she decides there is some money in her little
meeting after all and goes for it.
You can blame Paula all you want but if Bill had not been an amoral
skirt chaser, he would have not have been rolled like any John.
LZ
George Washington
> You still don't get it. She dangled the bait, Bill bit. Without him
> inviting her to his room, she had absolutely no case. Bill did this to
> himself just because he couldn't resist some twitching ass.
Clinton did nothing. Period. Paula Jones was unable to provide a scintilla
of evidence that he ever did any of the things she claimed he did. Period.
>
> That is how women get husbands, fur coats, diamond rings, etc. In her
> case she decided Bill's weenie was too small or didn't look tasty so she
> turned his offer down. Maybe it was because he was crass and klutzy and
> had no class. Later she decides there is some money in her little
> meeting after all and goes for it.
What offer? There was none. Period.
>
> You can blame Paula all you want but if Bill had not been an amoral
> skirt chaser, he would have not have been rolled like any John.
Bullshit - using that logic we can't blame the Air Force for your
transgressions, you were just a bloodthirsty, amoral, trigger happy enlisted
man.
George Washington
>
>
> ROBW wrote:
> >
> > War stories from old men are like Babe Ruth homers.
> > They get longer and more exaggerated with every telling.
>
> How would you know? There are only cowards in your bloodline.
> >
> > And we get impressed less and less, if we ever were at all.
> >
> Good, because they are not designed to impress, merely to acquaint you
> with things you never experienced yourself.
>
> > You make it sound like I have some reverence for your past.
>
> I'm sure these tales give you the drizzlies. Draft dodgers usually
> slither from any location where heroes might appear.
Huh? Then why did Bush land on the USS Abraham Lincoln?
> We'll let history judge whose contributions had merit. As far as I am
> concerned, I have already received all the reward due me. Just one chat
> with a grateful Korean who realizes my sacrifices made his life possible
> is reward enough.
Talk to the family members of any of the Koreans you killed, "Red"?
>
> Get any calls lately thanking you for dodging the draft?
The US would probably have been better off if YOU dodged the draft. But
then you didn't get drafted, you were "young and stupid" back then, weren't
you?
<snicker>
ROBW
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EE68F22...@direcway.com...
Lone Haranguer
George Washington wrote:
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EE68F22...@direcway.com...
> > You still don't get it. She dangled the bait, Bill bit. Without him
> > inviting her to his room, she had absolutely no case. Bill did this to
> > himself just because he couldn't resist some twitching ass.
>
> Clinton did nothing. Period. Paula Jones was unable to provide a scintilla
> of evidence that he ever did any of the things she claimed he did. Period.
>
Nor was it necessary. She DID have the witnesses that he had sent for
her to come to his room.
Bill cooked his own goose.
> >
> > That is how women get husbands, fur coats, diamond rings, etc. In her
> > case she decided Bill's weenie was too small or didn't look tasty so she
> > turned his offer down. Maybe it was because he was crass and klutzy and
> > had no class. Later she decides there is some money in her little
> > meeting after all and goes for it.
>
> What offer? There was none. Period.
His $850,000 check says there was a reasonable suspicion that there was
an offer.
>
> >
> > You can blame Paula all you want but if Bill had not been an amoral
> > skirt chaser, he would have not have been rolled like any John.
>
> Bullshit - using that logic we can't blame the Air Force for your
> transgressions, you were just a bloodthirsty, amoral, trigger happy enlisted
> man.
Huh? And you were whining about straying off topic? Hee Ho Haw, Har,
and giggle.
I was a combat crew member doing EXACTLY what I was trained for and
doing it VERY well.
Nothing but pats on the back for a job well done. Is that what is
snugging your shorts, Binky?
LZ
Lone Haranguer
George Washington wrote:
>
> "Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
> news:3EE1F46B...@direcway.com...
> >
> >
> > ROBW wrote:
> > >
> > > War stories from old men are like Babe Ruth homers.
> > > They get longer and more exaggerated with every telling.
> >
> > How would you know? There are only cowards in your bloodline.
> > >
> > > And we get impressed less and less, if we ever were at all.
> > >
> > Good, because they are not designed to impress, merely to acquaint you
> > with things you never experienced yourself.
> >
> > > You make it sound like I have some reverence for your past.
> >
> > I'm sure these tales give you the drizzlies. Draft dodgers usually
> > slither from any location where heroes might appear.
>
> Huh? Then why did Bush land on the USS Abraham Lincoln?
Because he entered military service and was trained as a jet pilot?
>
> > We'll let history judge whose contributions had merit. As far as I am
> > concerned, I have already received all the reward due me. Just one chat
> > with a grateful Korean who realizes my sacrifices made his life possible
> > is reward enough.
>
> Talk to the family members of any of the Koreans you killed, "Red"?
Contact with North Korea is quite limited (at their request). They may
well have been Chinese since at that stage of the war most of the war
effort was by Chinese troops. I doubt Chinese civilians were driving
ammo trucks behind their front lines.
>
> >
> > Get any calls lately thanking you for dodging the draft?
>
> The US would probably have been better off if YOU dodged the draft. But
> then you didn't get drafted, you were "young and stupid" back then, weren't
> you?
>
If you weren't so ignorant you would know that you can avoid even
registering if you enlist at 17. Of course at 17 you were probably
still suckling your mother's mammary glands.
LZ
Lone Haranguer
such suits because he tried to screw every floozy that twitched her butt
in his vicinity.
HE invited her to his room. He set the stage for the future lawsuit.
Had he not invited her to visit him, she would not even made it to first
base.
Live with it. Clinton's little head did the majority of his thinking.
LZ
Jim Alder
news:Zr-cndolCMF...@comcast.com:
> If you were not aware that she posed nude, you must have been
> either living in a cave or denial.
Well, I don't live in a cave, and I don't know why I'd be in
denial. Why should I care that she posed nude?
> And if I danced every time I punked one of you wankers, I'd
> have sore feet.
After all this time, you wouldn't have danced enough to have
worn the 'buster brown' logo off.
DJ
ROBW
But thanks for getting my back.
Appreciated, as always.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"George Washington" <__________@_____.____> wrote in message
news:XucFa.379$ou...@news1.east.cox.net...
ROBW
They're both whores.
Neither was innocent.
Problem is, a whore shouldn't be saying they were sexually harasses.
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Lone Haranguer" <lin...@direcway.com> wrote in message
news:3EE767D3...@direcway.com...
ROBW
Perhaps you should have kept up with those you were doing business with?
You really didn't know she posed nude?
How clueless and unaware were/are you?
BEEF
FEAR
CHECK
ENFORCED
COLLISION
BALLISTIC
PHOTO
PLAYERS
ENTER
DRUGS
EXTRA
LIQUOR
TANNING
ONLY
Hail to the Thief
robw
--
"Sing while you may" Edward Ka-Spel
"Jim Alder" <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9397A116CB51B...@216.168.3.44...
> "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Zr-cndolCMF...@comcast.com:
>
> > If you were not aware that she posed nude, you must have been
> > either living in a cave or denial.
>
> Well, I don't live in a cave, and I don't know why I'd be in
> denial. Why should I care that she posed nude?
>
> > And if I danced every time I punked one of you wankers, I'd
> > have sore feet.
>
> After all this time, you wouldn't have danced enough to have
> worn the 'buster brown' logo off.
>
George Washington
> "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:XeKdnUCSb59...@comcast.com:
> >
> > robw
>
> Here you have the "compleat" Robw, JJ. I hope you didn't
> expect anything more? He tosses around slanderous statements about
> a victim of Clinton's sociopathology, pretending he's asking
> questions.
Slanderous? Victim? How, when, where, what? The VICTIM was Bill Clinton,
who was the victim of EXTORTION, as proven by the fact that the lawsuit was
thrown out of court and settled (do you know what THAT means? And WHY that
happens?).
> You respond and he calls you an idiot.
That was kind!
> When you point out his duplicitous cowardice
And just what was that? Pray tell, WHAT was that? [float like a butterfly,
sting like a, well .................butterfly!!!!!]
George Washington
> So you're O.K. with a woman who claims that she was sexually harassed
> turning around (literally) and posing nude?
>
> The photo shoot was a fact.
> Her involvement with "Celebrity Boxing" was a fact.
And you were kind by NOT mentioning that the charge in the lawsuit was NOT a
fact, was indeed fake, and was tossed out!
George Washington
Plain and simple........smokescreen!!! Who cares, how does that affect life
today, what good will it do to rehash rumor and innuendo? As they say, "GET
[fucking] OVER IT!!!!!"
>
> --
> Can you hear me now?
Nope!
> Good!
Moron!
George Washington
> On Sun, 1 Jun 2003 21:26:47 -0400, "ROBW" <nodd...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >If you are comparing Serrano to a has been whore
A whore is a woman who sells her body for cold, hard cash. She doesn't have
to permit penetration or penetration. Paula Jones, despite her earlier
prostestations and proclamations, SOLD her body to the highest bidder and
exposed herself to the world for MONEY. Plain and simple, WHORE!
>
> When was she accused of prostitution?
Never. So???????