Worst ever word competition

[nob...@nowhere.com]

ISTR somebody claiming that "moist" was the word most likely to gross
people out.

I can only assume that is because their vocab lacks the word "exudate".
:|||\\

[auuV]

Well, Dr Pimple Popper is popular, after all.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

hey Dr Pimple Popper
dont pop me!

[auuV]

Now I am thinking of that caek. Was it a Fr*nch Fancy, or a Pineapple
Caek, or something else?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Victoria sponge caek.

Actually quite a delicious caek, *if* you can unsee the zit association,
which you cant. :|

[auuV]

Victoria sponge caeks are very good indeed. The large caek, sliced,
was a staple.

> *if* you can unsee the zit association,
>which you cant. :|

I dont think I ever tried eating one in that form factor. I take it
that it worked for you, because noone else wanted them?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 01:51:37 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:38:33 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 15:39:38 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:18:37 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 00:13:11 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:33:56 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>ISTR somebody claiming that "moist" was the word most likely to gross
>>>>>>people out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I can only assume that is because their vocab lacks the word "exudate".
>>>>>>:|||\\
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, Dr Pimple Popper is popular, after all.
>>>>
>>>>hey Dr Pimple Popper
>>>>dont pop me!
>>>
>>>Now I am thinking of that caek. Was it a Fr*nch Fancy, or a Pineapple
>>>Caek, or something else?
>>
>>Victoria sponge caek.
>>
>>Actually quite a delicious caek,
>
>
>Victoria sponge caeks are very good indeed. The large caek, sliced,
>was a staple.

Crimb0r now officially over. The words "large caek" are redacted from
my vocab for the foreseeable future. :(

>> *if* you can unsee the zit association,
>>which you cant. :|
>
>I dont think I ever tried eating one in that form factor. I take it
>that it worked for you, because noone else wanted them?

I might have discouraged them a little by playing up my descro of the
graphics in the ad. I couldnt help it, I was hungry! DoGGr would have
done the same!

[auuV]

On Mon, 08 Jan 2024 06:19:12 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 01:51:37 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:38:33 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 15:39:38 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:18:37 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 00:13:11 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:33:56 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>ISTR somebody claiming that "moist" was the word most likely to gross
>>>>>>>people out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I can only assume that is because their vocab lacks the word "exudate".
>>>>>>>:|||\\
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Well, Dr Pimple Popper is popular, after all.
>>>>>
>>>>>hey Dr Pimple Popper
>>>>>dont pop me!
>>>>
>>>>Now I am thinking of that caek. Was it a Fr*nch Fancy, or a Pineapple
>>>>Caek, or something else?
>>>
>>>Victoria sponge caek.
>>>
>>>Actually quite a delicious caek,
>>
>>
>>Victoria sponge caeks are very good indeed. The large caek, sliced,
>>was a staple.
>
>Crimb0r now officially over. The words "large caek" are redacted from
>my vocab for the foreseeable future. :(

Bit like my situation. No caek. Hot cross buns are possible, if
ingreds checked carefully.

>>> *if* you can unsee the zit association,
>>>which you cant. :|
>>
>>I dont think I ever tried eating one in that form factor. I take it
>>that it worked for you, because noone else wanted them?
>
>I might have discouraged them a little by playing up my descro of the
>graphics in the ad. I couldnt help it, I was hungry! DoGGr would have
>done the same!

DoGGr absolutely would! And would have made sure it was on the
floor*, to put anyone off who hadnt already been put off!

* Cat accomplice can help with that.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Mon, 08 Jan 2024 23:40:52 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Jan 2024 06:19:12 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 01:51:37 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 04 Jan 2024 10:38:33 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 15:39:38 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 01:18:37 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Mon, 25 Dec 2023 00:13:11 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On Fri, 22 Dec 2023 16:33:56 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>ISTR somebody claiming that "moist" was the word most likely to gross
>>>>>>>>people out.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I can only assume that is because their vocab lacks the word "exudate".
>>>>>>>>:|||\\
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, Dr Pimple Popper is popular, after all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>hey Dr Pimple Popper
>>>>>>dont pop me!
>>>>>
>>>>>Now I am thinking of that caek. Was it a Fr*nch Fancy, or a Pineapple
>>>>>Caek, or something else?
>>>>
>>>>Victoria sponge caek.
>>>>
>>>>Actually quite a delicious caek,
>>>
>>>
>>>Victoria sponge caeks are very good indeed. The large caek, sliced,
>>>was a staple.
>>
>>Crimb0r now officially over. The words "large caek" are redacted from
>>my vocab for the foreseeable future. :(
>
>Bit like my situation. No caek. Hot cross buns are possible, if
>ingreds checked carefully.

Going from crimb0r pud for breakfast to 100g of boiled kale is all you
get today, is hard. :|

>>>> *if* you can unsee the zit association,
>>>>which you cant. :|
>>>
>>>I dont think I ever tried eating one in that form factor. I take it
>>>that it worked for you, because noone else wanted them?
>>
>>I might have discouraged them a little by playing up my descro of the
>>graphics in the ad. I couldnt help it, I was hungry! DoGGr would have
>>done the same!
>
>DoGGr absolutely would! And would have made sure it was on the
>floor*, to put anyone off who hadnt already been put off!

Oh, sorry. I accidentally brushed that with my tail. Now some is on
the floor and the rest has fur in it. Are you sure you still want to
eat it?

>* Cat accomplice can help with that.

"You look like the cat who teamed up with the dog in an _Oceans Two_
style heist caper to get the cream."

[auuV]

You are not kidding. :|

>>>>> *if* you can unsee the zit association,
>>>>>which you cant. :|
>>>>
>>>>I dont think I ever tried eating one in that form factor. I take it
>>>>that it worked for you, because noone else wanted them?
>>>
>>>I might have discouraged them a little by playing up my descro of the
>>>graphics in the ad. I couldnt help it, I was hungry! DoGGr would have
>>>done the same!
>>
>>DoGGr absolutely would! And would have made sure it was on the
>>floor*, to put anyone off who hadnt already been put off!
>
>Oh, sorry. I accidentally brushed that with my tail. Now some is on
>the floor and the rest has fur in it. Are you sure you still want to
>eat it?

Works nearly every time! Apart from some family members, but DoGGr
just has to work with what hes got.

>>* Cat accomplice can help with that.
>
>"You look like the cat who teamed up with the dog in an _Oceans Two_
>style heist caper to get the cream."

Succinctly put!

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Im not. :|

But I did discover some good news: bacon only has half the calories if
you drain the fat off it. So you can eat twice as much!

[auuV]

This is important knowledge about fattier fudes. See also sausages.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Sausages vary in how much fat comes out, so you need to do some complex
calculus first.

Burghers are even worse - the fat loss is already accounted for in the
nutridata. :(

[auuV]

Sausage is from the latin "saltus" meaning salted.

Calculus is from the latin for a small pebble.

Botulism is from the german "botulismus", originally "sausage
poisoning", from Latin "botulus" meaning sausage.

No, I thought I understood something there, but it was evanescent and
its gone now.

>Burghers are even worse - the fat loss is already accounted for in the
>nutridata. :(

I call that unsporting!

[nob...@nowhere.com]

I only know about sausage roll poisoning. Not sure if thats the same
thing?

>>Burghers are even worse - the fat loss is already accounted for in the
>>nutridata. :(
>
>I call that unsporting!

Bunch of po-faced killjoys. :(

[auuV]

Im not an expert. Best check if in doubt.

>>>Burghers are even worse - the fat loss is already accounted for in the
>>>nutridata. :(
>>
>>I call that unsporting!
>
>Bunch of po-faced killjoys. :(

Taking all the fun out of having treats!