Thank fuck the nineties is over

[DiGGr]

At last. An even-numbered decade.

Woo.

--
n/| TM
>o-O u ©1999
~~~~~~~~DiGGr®
http://www.shytenet.co.uk/users/diggr/

[~jacaranda]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, in message
<ikhq6s8j1ev48n49o...@4ax.com>, DiGGr wrote:

>At last. An even-numbered decade.

Enjoy. :)

>Woo.

Can I quote you on that?

--
~jacaranda mhm23x7

And if I die before I wake up
I pray the Lord don't smudge my makeup <B>:</B>

[neurotrashboy]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:

>At last. An even-numbered decade.

:(((99

>Woo.

<whine!>

--
Copyright �2010 neurotrashboy http://www.shyte.net/users/ntb/

jodie never sleeps cause there are always needles in the hay

[auuV]

On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>
>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>
> :(((99
>
>>Woo.
>
><whine!>

Its only a numbering system, though.

--
he wahi lio Lehua kou inoa la
hanohano wale 'oe Hawai'i la

[neurotrashboy]

On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>
>> :(((99
>>
>>>Woo.
>>
>><whine!>
>
>Its only a numbering system, though.

One of many. And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].

I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
though. :D

[1] I wanted to q-substitute that for antigreppingloonification, but
"2Q12" has its own meaning, as does "2*12". Dang.

[Don Stockbauer]

On Jan 4, 6:14 pm, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk> wrote:

> On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <a...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
> >On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
> >wrote:
>
> >>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>
> >>>At last.  An even-numbered decade.
>
> >> :(((99
>
> >>>Woo.
>
> >><whine!>
>
> >Its only a numbering system, though.
>
> One of many.  And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
> well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].
>
> I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
> though.  :D

It's not, since the calendar starts with year 1. Thus 2011 is the
beginning of the next decade.

[auuV]

On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:58 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>
>>> :(((99
>>>
>>>>Woo.
>>>
>>><whine!>
>>
>>Its only a numbering system, though.
>
>One of many.

E!

>And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
>well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].

Ah, yes. Fruitful source of numerology obsession, right there.

>I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
>though. :D

<twists toe in sand>

>[1] I wanted to q-substitute that for antigreppingloonification, but
>"2Q12" has its own meaning, as does "2*12". Dang.

How about "2YKW12"?

[Don Stockbauer]

On Jan 5, 1:23 am, auuV <a...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:58 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <a...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
>
> >>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
> >>wrote:
>
> >>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>At last.  An even-numbered decade.
>
> >>> :(((99
>
> >>>>Woo.
>
> >>><whine!>
>
> >>Its only a numbering system, though.
>
> >One of many.  
>
> E!
>
> >And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
> >well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].
>
> Ah, yes.  Fruitful source of numerology obsession, right there.
>
> >I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
> >though.  :D
>
> <twists toe in sand>

<squishes poor, innocent hermit crab>

[Don Stockbauer]

No, wait, it's alive, Mommy!

[neurotrashboy]

On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:23:43 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:58 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>
>>>> :(((99
>>>>
>>>>>Woo.
>>>>
>>>><whine!>
>>>
>>>Its only a numbering system, though.
>>
>>One of many.
>
>E!
>
>>And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
>>well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].
>
>Ah, yes. Fruitful source of numerology obsession, right there.
>
>>I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
>>though. :D
>
><twists toe in sand>

If we spoke of "the 201st decade" the way we speak of "the 21st century"
or "the third millennium", then, granted, 2009 wouldnt be the end of it,
2010 would.

But we dont. We speak of "the noughties", and that clearly means
"2000..2009".

HTH.

>>[1] I wanted to q-substitute that for antigreppingloonification, but
>>"2Q12" has its own meaning, as does "2*12". Dang.
>
>How about "2YKW12"?

Hmm. Looks clumsy. Dont know.

[auuV]

On Thu, 07 Jan 2010 22:33:47 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:23:43 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 00:14:58 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 03 Jan 2010 20:21:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zazehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> :(((99
>>>>>
>>>>>>Woo.
>>>>>
>>>>><whine!>
>>>>
>>>>Its only a numbering system, though.
>>>
>>>One of many.
>>
>>E!
>>
>>>And if youre going to obsess about numerology, might as
>>>well go for the big one - I speak, of course, of 2012[1].
>>
>>Ah, yes. Fruitful source of numerology obsession, right there.
>>
>>>I was amused by people saying that 2009 wasnt the end of "the decade",
>>>though. :D
>>
>><twists toe in sand>
>
>If we spoke of "the 201st decade" the way we speak of "the 21st century"
>or "the third millennium", then, granted, 2009 wouldnt be the end of it,
>2010 would.

Appreciated. :)

But I had to think about it.

>But we dont. We speak of "the noughties", and that clearly means
>"2000..2009".

Indeed!

>HTH.

E!

SY. :)

>>>[1] I wanted to q-substitute that for antigreppingloonification, but
>>>"2Q12" has its own meaning, as does "2*12". Dang.
>>
>>How about "2YKW12"?
>
>Hmm. Looks clumsy. Dont know.

IKWYM. It looks as if its trying to say something else.

[Don Stockbauer]

Since the calendar starts with the year 1, 2011 in the start of the
next decade.

QED.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>
>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>
> :(((99
>
>>Woo.
>
><whine!>

Chin up, old boy. Only one more year.

[auuV]

Taking each day as it comes. :)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Taking each day up the Khyber.

[auuV]

Why didnt I get a curey on the way Back :) this evening?

Came right past the .inian place!

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>
>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>
> :(((99

EEE-VENS! :)))00

>>Woo.
>
><whine!>

https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s

SPNAK!

[auuV]

On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>
>> :(((99
>
>EEE-VENS! :)))00

EEEEE-VENS! :)))00

>>>Woo.
>>
>><whine!>
>
>https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s
>
>SPNAK!

Showed them what their arse holes were for!

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:17:06 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>
>>> :(((99
>>
>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>
>EEEEE-VENS! :)))00

EEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00

[auuV]

On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:58:09 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:17:06 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>
>>>> :(((99
>>>
>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>
>>EEEEE-VENS! :)))00
>
>EEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00

EEEEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00

(with odd numbers of Es, I sees)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:01:09 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:58:09 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:17:06 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> :(((99
>>>>
>>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>
>>>EEEEE-VENS! :)))00
>>
>>EEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00
>
>EEEEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00

/E(EE)*-VEHENS!/ :)))00

>(with odd numbers of Es, I sees)

Dont worry, regexp got it covered.

[auuV]

On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:24:28 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 23:01:09 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 21:58:09 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:17:06 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :(((99
>>>>>
>>>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>>
>>>>EEEEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>
>>>EEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00
>>
>>EEEEEEEEE-VEHENS! :)))00
>
>/E(EE)*-VEHENS!/ :)))00
>
>>(with odd numbers of Es, I sees)
>
>Dont worry, regexp got it covered.

Im glad!

/E(EE)*-VEHENS!/ :)))00

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>
>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>
>> :(((99
>
>EEE-VENS! :)))00

Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.

"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"

FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.

>>>Woo.
>>
>><whine!>
>
>https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s
>
>SPNAK!

Have to update that article at some point. I dont feel it really
reflects the experience of those of us who were there. :|

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>
>>> :(((99
>>
>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>
>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>
>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>
>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.

Nice to start the same ol same ol[1] year with a RANT though. :)

>>>>Woo.
>>>
>>><whine!>
>>
>>https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s
>>
>>SPNAK!
>
>Have to update that article at some point. I dont feel it really
>reflects the experience of those of us who were there. :|

[1] Lets be realistic. :|

[auuV]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>
>>> :(((99
>>
>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>
>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.

O_O

>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>
>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.

:O

>>>>Woo.
>>>
>>><whine!>
>>
>>https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s
>>
>>SPNAK!
>
>Have to update that article at some point. I dont feel it really
>reflects the experience of those of us who were there. :|

Fair enough!

[auuV]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:01:21 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>
>>>> :(((99
>>>
>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>
>>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>>
>>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>>
>>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.
>
>Nice to start the same ol same ol[1] year with a RANT though. :)

Nice one!

Beat me to the new year post as I came to post one! :)

>
>>>>>Woo.
>>>>
>>>><whine!>
>>>
>>>https://ap.aroonn.uk/index.php?title=2010s
>>>
>>>SPNAK!
>>
>>Have to update that article at some point. I dont feel it really
>>reflects the experience of those of us who were there. :|
>
>
>[1] Lets be realistic. :|

Being aroonnian. :)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:02:27 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>
>>>> :(((99
>>>
>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>
>>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>
> O_O

And even more O_O when you realise that the whole thing was a trial run
by the Illqminati for... you know...

>>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>>
>>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.
>
> :O

I dont want them to die. I just want them to be a burden on their
families. And their families to resent them for it. Is that too harsh?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:04:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:01:21 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> :(((99
>>>>
>>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>
>>>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>>>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>>>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>>>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>>>
>>>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>>>
>>>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.
>>
>>Nice to start the same ol same ol[1] year with a RANT though. :)
>
>Nice one!
>
>Beat me to the new year post as I came to post one! :)

So zetta slow!

[auuV]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:27:53 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:02:27 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>
>>>>> :(((99
>>>>
>>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>
>>>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>>>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>>>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>>>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>>
>> O_O
>
>And even more O_O when you realise that the whole thing was a trial run
>by the Illqminati for... you know...

I think so...

>>>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>>>
>>>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.
>>
>> :O
>
>I dont want them to die. I just want them to be a burden on their
>families. And their families to resent them for it. Is that too harsh?

Its fairly harsh.

[auuV]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:32:40 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:04:20 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:01:21 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:07:16 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:34:27 +0000, neurotrashboy <tr...@shytenet.co.uk>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Sat, 01 Jan 2000 00:25:58 GMT, DiGGr <Di...@telebot.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>At last. An even-numbered decade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :(((99
>>>>>
>>>>>EEE-VENS! :)))00
>>>>
>>>>Jesus christ. The teenies sucked *so* much that they actually tried to
>>>>sabotage the incoming decade by leaving it with an almost unprecedented
>>>>pandemic out of sheer fucking spite like Hakkar the Soulflayer
>>>>triggering the Corrupted Blood incident.
>>>>
>>>>"Oh hating on odd numbered decades is just so *ignorant*!"
>>>>
>>>>FUCK OFF AND GET THE COUGH YOU PRICK MANGLING CUNTWEASELS.
>>>
>>>Nice to start the same ol same ol[1] year with a RANT though. :)
>>
>>Nice one!
>>
>>Beat me to the new year post as I came to post one! :)
>
>So zetta slow!

:)))00

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Well listening to *hours* of Feuerwerken puts me in a harsh mood.

Still hearing the occasional distant bang now. Were not on Azores time
you fucking dweebs.

[auuV]

Pillocks.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

On Sat, 01 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0000, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

(Except the chavvy "nuw yere" Feuerwerken that have been going off all
evening, obv.)

So heres to the first year in living memory that isnt a complete
radioactive dogshit train wreck dumpster fire.

YAY!

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Talk about fucking optimism. I deserve some sort of award. :|

[auuV]

:|||

[auuV]

Would you be interested in a nomination for the "Years Are Weird"
award?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Sure, why not? Is that a SIG of the "Time Is Weird" people?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

OK, so it hasnt entirely managed to avoid being a complete radioactive
dogshit train wreck dumpster fire *so far*. But I say we give it more
time.

[auuV]

They sponsor it, yes.

I just did this quiz. Dated, of course.

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/TIME/gjnvwwjegvw/

[auuV]

Time, give it time.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

and I, Im fond of peace
I follow time
its full of loopholes

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Thought it looked like their work.

Though Im surprised they were prepared to invest in anything after the
DejaNews "10,000-year" archive got borged by la Goog and neutered after
less than a thousandth of that time. Admittedly that was the "Aeons Are
Weird" people, but even so.

>I just did this quiz. Dated, of course.
>
>https://www.reuters.com/graphics/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/TIME/gjnvwwjegvw/

And a bit unscientific. But thats psychology for you I suppose.

[auuV]

Its all a question of time?

[auuV]

Aeons are Ace. Archiving is Weird.

>
>>I just did this quiz. Dated, of course.
>>
>>https://www.reuters.com/graphics/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/TIME/gjnvwwjegvw/
>
>And a bit unscientific. But thats psychology for you I suppose.

Pretty much. :|

[nob...@nowhere.com]

I remember the day I learned that warehoused data are denormalised.

Needed hot tea and a *long* sit down. :(

[nob...@nowhere.com]

its all a question of time.

[auuV]

Data warehouse. Now theres a name I havent heard for a long time. I
used to be all about the ETL. Im sorry you were traumatised by the
denormalisation!

[auuV]

Its for the neutron, yeah.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

I mean, I understand why they did it. Its just... you know.

[auuV]

It really is. I hope you managed to find some comfort or distraction.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Ive taken to going through texts boohook and gumming together the pages
I disagree with so I dont have to read them again. Works really well.
:)

[auuV]

That reminded me of books from old aunties houses (and later, from
second hand bookshops) that had uncut pages. Have you ever had the
joy of cutting the pages open with a <thinks> paper knife? :)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Oh yes.

Did wonder how the previous reader(s) had missed that though.

"Oh look, two pages are stuck together and theres a two page gap in the
narrative. 440 Hz."

[auuV]

Its a complete mystery.

Except for a thought that maybe people dont always read the whole of a
book? Giving up, never starting, skipping bits.

Maybe they just liked cutting the pages but did a few at a time, not
wanting to use them all up.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Now I want to get a job at a library. And whenever someone brings a
book back Id ask them what they thought of it. What they thought of the
ending. Maybe even give them a little test.

"I can never go back to that library," people would say. "He KNOWS."

>Maybe they just liked cutting the pages but did a few at a time, not
>wanting to use them all up.

Good point. Def grat, like only popping half the bubble wrap so you
still have some for later. (Does anyone actually *do* that?)

[auuV]

My life is a constant anticipation of that exact thing happening.

>"I can never go back to that library," people would say. "He KNOWS."

<kccchhh!>

>>Maybe they just liked cutting the pages but did a few at a time, not
>>wanting to use them all up.
>
>Good point. Def grat, like only popping half the bubble wrap so you
>still have some for later. (Does anyone actually *do* that?)

I could do that! Probably have done. Certainly plenty of unpopped
bubble rap in odd corners here.

(Its a tipo but I like it too much to correct it.)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Theres an old Channel 4 program where sombody did the _Bubble Rap_. It
was a bit like a Weird Al parody, but not as well done - though nowhere
near as bad as _Whose Line Is It Anyway_.

Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
it. :(

[auuV]

Id have to see it to form an opinion. The elevator pitch hasnt swept
me off my fucking feet, I must admit.

>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>it. :(

:(((

Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?

[nob...@nowhere.com]

They[TM] didnt call synopses "elevator pitches" back then. It was a
more innocent, and refreshing, age.

>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>it. :(
>
> :(((
>
>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?

I would have to say "yes".

The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
are.

[auuV]

<sigh> I had forgotten that.

Chatting to someone today who hadnt gone to Beyonce or Harry Styles,
but goes to see big hip hop names when they are in the country. I
asked if she raps - just at karaoke so far. Good on her! Got to be
better than _WLIIA?_

>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>it. :(
>>
>> :(((
>>
>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>
>I would have to say "yes".
>
>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>are.

Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Im DJ ${NAME} and Im here to say
the way this rap starts is a total cliche

>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>it. :(
>>>
>>> :(((
>>>
>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>
>>I would have to say "yes".
>>
>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>are.
>
>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.

What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(

[nob...@nowhere.com]

23 magic, if you can change your life

[auuV]

Well Im MC S(NAME) and Im here to diss
they said this is hard but its a piece of pyce

>
>>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>>it. :(
>>>>
>>>> :(((
>>>>
>>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>>
>>>I would have to say "yes".
>>>
>>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>>are.
>>
>>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.
>
>What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(

I did a double take and then a very stern look, I dont mind telling
you.

[auuV]

On Sat, 03 Jun 2023 21:38:25 +0100, nob...@nowhere.com wrote:

>23 magic, if you can change your life

look hard enough

[nob...@nowhere.com]

you just didnt

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Im smart and Im fly and I always see the fnords
I jus cant type em cos this shitty phone keyboard

>>
>>>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>>>it. :(
>>>>>
>>>>> :(((
>>>>>
>>>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>>>
>>>>I would have to say "yes".
>>>>
>>>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>>>are.
>>>
>>>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>>>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.
>>
>>What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(
>
>I did a double take and then a very stern look, I dont mind telling
>you.

You imposed a harsher punishment then most govt regulators, then.

No idea how many financial regulations you would have to break to
actually incur a stern look, but I bet its a lot.

[auuV]

where did i go wrong then?

[auuV]

I clapped back got an app hack
On the right tack respect appreciation

>>>
>>>>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>>>>it. :(
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :(((
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>>>>
>>>>>I would have to say "yes".
>>>>>
>>>>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>>>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>>>>are.
>>>>
>>>>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>>>>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.
>>>
>>>What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(
>>
>>I did a double take and then a very stern look, I dont mind telling
>>you.
>
>You imposed a harsher punishment then most govt regulators, then.

Someone has to uphold standards in this shimmering world.

>No idea how many financial regulations you would have to break to
>actually incur a stern look, but I bet its a lot.

I read the ps0t and think I can see where its falling down the cracks.
Which should be covered by some anti-scamming measures, but I think I
am going to be very disappointed. I understand unregulated means
unregulated, but an obligation to state some kind of warning should be
possible.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

your rhymes are stale, I couldnt give tuppence
what Im dropping is your comeuppance

>>>>
>>>>>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>>>>>it. :(
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> :(((
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I would have to say "yes".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>>>>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>>>>>are.
>>>>>
>>>>>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>>>>>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.
>>>>
>>>>What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(
>>>
>>>I did a double take and then a very stern look, I dont mind telling
>>>you.
>>
>>You imposed a harsher punishment then most govt regulators, then.
>
>Someone has to uphold standards in this shimmering world.

"Shimmering" is a really good word for it, isnt it? :|

I particularly appreciate how the fatae morgana seem to solidify while
actual reality becomes ever more hazy. (Wasnt there a bit in HHGttG
about that?)

>>No idea how many financial regulations you would have to break to
>>actually incur a stern look, but I bet its a lot.
>
>I read the ps0t and think I can see where its falling down the cracks.
>Which should be covered by some anti-scamming measures, but I think I
>am going to be very disappointed. I understand unregulated means
>unregulated, but an obligation to state some kind of warning should be
>possible.

You mean scammers should have to declare that theyre scammers?

I was thinking more along the lines of a tip line where you could report
dodgy stuff and if they got enough reports about a specific person or
company then someone would take a look at them.

That would have to be funded by someone, though. Whereas the costs of
fraud are borne by the victim.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

every now and then

[auuV]

My inline rhymes go with the times
Sublime, spittin fine, Im like wine

>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Im sad that Im going to have to shift into a parallel universe to watch
>>>>>>>>>it. :(
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :(((
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Q: Was C4 in its early days a parallel universe?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I would have to say "yes".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The progressivism that early C4 clearly touted showed us one possible
>>>>>>>future. But everyone chose a much more shitty future, and here we all
>>>>>>>are.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yep. I even passed an office garage entrance the other day that said
>>>>>>"Maximum Headroom". Was saddened and disappointed.
>>>>>
>>>>>What?! Cl*wnworld has gone too far. :(
>>>>
>>>>I did a double take and then a very stern look, I dont mind telling
>>>>you.
>>>
>>>You imposed a harsher punishment then most govt regulators, then.
>>
>>Someone has to uphold standards in this shimmering world.
>
>"Shimmering" is a really good word for it, isnt it? :|

Isnt it?

>I particularly appreciate how the fatae morgana seem to solidify while
>actual reality becomes ever more hazy. (Wasnt there a bit in HHGttG
>about that?)

Was there? If so, spot on. I may have had a conversation along those
lines this afternoon, sitting in the sunshine.

>>>No idea how many financial regulations you would have to break to
>>>actually incur a stern look, but I bet its a lot.
>>
>>I read the ps0t and think I can see where its falling down the cracks.
>>Which should be covered by some anti-scamming measures, but I think I
>>am going to be very disappointed. I understand unregulated means
>>unregulated, but an obligation to state some kind of warning should be
>>possible.
>
>You mean scammers should have to declare that theyre scammers?

I have seen ads for investments in casks of whisky (pretty sure that
was what it was) with an honest misclaimer at the foot explaining
about its unregulatedness. Not saying thats a scam investment of
course.

>I was thinking more along the lines of a tip line where you could report
>dodgy stuff and if they got enough reports about a specific person or
>company then someone would take a look at them.

There bally well ought to be.

[auuV]

i get a little bit lonely

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Danm! Well played.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

you aint like wine you more like milk
bag of verbiage like a second rate filk

See! The system works!

[auuV]

<bows>

[auuV]

My milkshake brings all the boys to the yard
And they're like, it's better than yours
Damn right it's better than yours

(Thanks for stepping in for me there, Kelis!)

[nob...@nowhere.com]

[Coco Pops advert theme]

(Two of us can play the lazy card.)

[auuV]

I kind of miss Coco Pops, right at this minute!

I didnt even like them. Used to buy the little variety packs and
always had the Coco Pops left over.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

Whereas nowadays youd presumly just Bing "creative recipes with coco
pops".

Ignoring the first hit at cookpad.com who incorrectly believe that I am
a bot *and* that I am prepared to jump through bullshit hoops to view
their shitty content, we come to myfoodbook.com.au who offer, among
other things, "choc mint crackle cheesecake lasagne".

I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
costs?

[auuV]

Hmm. They had me up to the lasagne bit. TBperfectlyH, Id prefer to
stop at the "choc mint crackle". That sounds delish.

>I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
>costs?

It doesnt sound like a budget pre-payday resipe, does it? :(

[nob...@nowhere.com]

I think "lasagne" is a style of dish (specifically, alternating layers)
rather than a literal "put tomato and cheese sors in it" type of thing.

>>I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
>>costs?
>
>It doesnt sound like a budget pre-payday resipe, does it? :(

"You can afford it - you have over T€13k!" -- Bad Shoulder Guy.

[auuV]

OK, I accept that. And wish I could have choc mint crackle. Maybe an
ise crem layer, if I may?

>>>I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
>>>costs?
>>
>>It doesnt sound like a budget pre-payday resipe, does it? :(
>
>"You can afford it - you have over T€13k!" -- Bad Shoulder Guy.

I have indulged this evening in an Irish Latte and two coffee sweets
from the .cnian supermarket in the ancient building up the South Side.

[nob...@nowhere.com]

The fully custom option is rather more expensive. But worth it, dont
you think?

>>>>I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
>>>>costs?
>>>
>>>It doesnt sound like a budget pre-payday resipe, does it? :(
>>
>>"You can afford it - you have over T€13k!" -- Bad Shoulder Guy.
>
>I have indulged this evening in an Irish Latte and two coffee sweets
>from the .cnian supermarket in the ancient building up the South Side.

<MobyCancel>

Im still experimenting with various configurations of coffee, instant
coffee and coffee liqueur.

(Mental note: Must remember to save enough coffee liqueur for blacks
russian. Also buy some stout.)

[auuV]

Creme de la menthe sorbet layer, Rodney.

>>>>>I wonder if its available at ARCC. And how many millions of T€ it
>>>>>costs?
>>>>
>>>>It doesnt sound like a budget pre-payday resipe, does it? :(
>>>
>>>"You can afford it - you have over T€13k!" -- Bad Shoulder Guy.
>>
>>I have indulged this evening in an Irish Latte and two coffee sweets
>>from the .cnian supermarket in the ancient building up the South Side.
>
><MobyCancel>
>
>Im still experimenting with various configurations of coffee, instant
>coffee and coffee liqueur.
>
>(Mental note: Must remember to save enough coffee liqueur for blacks
>russian. Also buy some stout.)

Very nice, a bit heady though.