On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 19:52:53 +0000,
nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:02:07 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 10:41:13 +0000,
nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 07 Feb 2024 00:19:33 +0000, auuV <au...@zehen.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 06 Feb 2024 01:37:13 +0000,
nob...@nowhere.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It would certainly explain a lot. :|
>>>>
>>>>Oh my, now you come to mention it!
>>>>
>>>> O_O
>>>>
>>>>Can it be unseen?
>>>
>>>Not just the appearnce. Mannerisms as well. And personality too, Ill
>>>be bound. :|
>>
>>TBF, prime minister S doesnt eat for 36 hours at the start of each
>>week and second-class technician R doesnt seem to eat much*, so there
>>might be something in what you say.
>
>Does *every* tory PM have to have a stupid biological drive defying
>quirk?
Thatch: didnt slepe much, ate more eggs than the stupid dietary advice
of the time recommended.
May: awful self-conscious dancer but didnt keep it to herself
Cameron: *REDACTED* dead pig
Johnson: didnt keep *REDACTED* to himself.
Then there was that one that had a shelf life shorter than a lettuce.
Is that a biological quirk?
>Must we add Pathological Demand Avoidance to their lystte of faults?
>
>>* I didnt see any series when They[TM] mucked about with Rimmers
>>state.
>
>Very carefully worded.
It was.
>You must have missed a lot of it then. :|
Sure did!