Who is this Rudy Canoza bot? Re: China's economy/McCain..
lc
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.royalty/msg/f490476ae95082a7
Re: Rudy Canoza: John McCain "doesn't get it" and he's running for
President!//Re: Will China's economy overtake that of the U.S.?
Xiamen, China: Laura Schlessinger's sexy new sportboat in a box
On Jul 14, 10:43 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
> lc wrote:
> > Rudy Canoza: John McCain "doesn't get it" [economy] and he's running
> > for President!
>
> >>> Rudy Canoza:
> >>> joke?
> >> Your question, of course, is an invalid complex question containing an
> >> unwarranted assumption, so I won't dignify it with an answer.
>
> > That was a terrible question, thank you for responding.
>
> It was a fuckwit's question. It was your question. You're a fuckwit.
>
>
>
> > Rudy, We now see
>
> You don't see anything. You're a clueless fucking moron.
>
> >> Why should I wish to support American workers with my purchases? My
> >> goal in making purchases is to satisfy /my/ preferences.
>
> > You do what works for Rudy. I was thinking in terms of the Morgan/
> > Schlessinger type screed.
>
> You weren't thinking at all. You're a stupid, unthinking fuck; a total
> fuckwit.
>
> >> But you still don't get it. China's economy is growing, because
>
> > I'm not an economy student,
>
> You're not any kind of student. You're a stupid cunt.
>
> >> because GDP per capita is higher. It's not the total that's
> >> important; it's the amount per capita.
>
> > Thank you for the economy lessons.
>
> It went right over your head. You're a fuckwit who can't tie his own
> shoes, and needs assistance getting into a pair of slip-ons.
>
> You're stupid and immobile. Dogs piss on you.
>
> > On Jul 11, 2:40 pm, Rudy Canoza <notgen...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 11, 11:10 am, lc <lol7...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Rudy Canoza: Why do you want a declining America to be a worldwide
> >>> joke?
> >> Your question, of course, is an invalid complex question containing an
> >> unwarranted assumption, so I won't dignify it with an answer.
>
> >>>>> Will China's economy overtake that of the U.S.?
> >>> Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot
> >>>> Of course. So fucking what?
> >>>> It will be decades before they catch up to us in per capita GDP, and
> >>>> that's what counts. Even when they do, big fucking deal. The US dwarfs
> >>>> Switzerland (and most other countries) in total GDP, and our per capita
> >>>> GDP is significantly higher than theirs when looked at in purchasing
> >>>> power parity (PPP), the only legitimate way to compare. Yet the Swiss
> >>>> live quite well, and have no reason to fret.
> >>> This should be positive for the Chinese antique market, I'm not
> >>> complaining. I do question the hypocrites who rail against Communists
> >>> or claim they want to support America and USA workers [when their
> >>> actions are opposite of their rhetoric].
> >> Why should I wish to support American workers with my purchases? My
> >> goal in making purchases is to satisfy /my/ preferences.
>
> >>> As long as GDP holds. I commend you for indicating that taking future
> >>> generations down to #2, #3 and so on can be acceptable. America is
> >>> rapidly becoming a joke around the world.
> >> Largely for misguided politics.
>
> >> But you still don't get it. China's economy is growing, because their
> >> per capita productivity is growing. China's per capita productivity
> >> could be half of ours, but with more than three times our population,
> >> their economy would be larger than ours.
>
> >> Once again: so what? Just how do you think that matters? Economies
> >> don't compete.
>
> >> Don't forget that the EU's economy, if considered a single economy,
> >> already is bigger than ours, too, but Americans live better on average
> >> because GDP per capita is higher. It's not the total that's
> >> important; it's the amount per capita.