Re: another bigot buys it
Gord McFee
> HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
steve wolk
"Gord McFee" <gord....@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com...
> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
>
> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
>
> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
Makes my day.
Sara Salzman
Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
>
> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
>
> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that is.
Sara
--
"Thug-leader Sarah Saltzmann addresses small audience in Denver,
splutters outrage at David Irving again"
- David Irving's description of a 90-minute lecture to 200 people in
Boulder, CO, in which Irving was mentioned once.
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com>,
> > Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
> >>
> >> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> >> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
> >>
> >> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
> >
> > and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that is.
> >
> > Sara
> >
>
> Never heard of the guy.....
Of course not. Because you're an ignorant little hater.
Yet that didn't stop you from posting an offensive article about Andrea
Dworkin ... who I'm sure you had ALSO never heard of. But some "aryan"
told you she was bad, so you bought it.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Sara Salzman wrote
in message
<catamont-808942...@news.giganews.com>:
>In article <3921479.jf4G2dpddT@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com>
>wrote:
>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>> > In article <O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com>,
>> > Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
>> >> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
>> >> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
>> >>
>> >> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
>> >
>> > and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that is.
>> Never heard of the guy.....
>Of course not. Because you're an ignorant little hater.
>
>Yet that didn't stop you from posting an offensive article about Andrea
>Dworkin ... who I'm sure you had ALSO never heard of. But some "aryan"
>told you she was bad, so you bought it.
The old con artist just told me that he called wolfie an agent
provocateur because he was involved in the conspiracy to deport irving
from Canada.
Gee, and I thought it was simply a matter of it not being a good idea
to lie to immigrations...
colonel_...@yahoo.com.au
Oh wait, it turns out Grantie is now a "hero" (there word) for the CJC!
Politics and strange bedfellows.....
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <3219076.MLVL9IaaFo@(FreeBSD)>:
>Roger wrote:
>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>> in message <1719088.8c6bCpoZjC@(FreeBSD)>:
>> Still can't think for yourself, huh?
>>
>> And still running as well.
>Truth hurts don't it...
Evidently -- that's why you avoid it at all costs.
>Btw, I see that you're still running from the questions posed to you in
>a.p.s about your religious beliefs.
Nope -- just refuse to discuss them in that forum.
One notes that *you* have not answered any questions on the topic
either.
And you're *still* running from those dozen reposts.
Roger
Way Back Jack
>Learn some of the facts about feminism and the crap that evil whore Dworkin
>taught.
Andrea "The Dork" Dworkin?
Is she the dyke who said that marriage was legitimatized rape?
So many people from right-wing fundy Christians to leftist black
activists and damn near everybody in between blame society's woes in
large part on the collapse of the two-parent family structure.
And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Roger wrote:
>>>> Still can't think for yourself, huh?
>>>>
>>>> And still running as well.
>>>Truth hurts don't it...
>> Evidently -- that's why you avoid it at all costs.
>>>Btw, I see that you're still running from the questions posed to you in
>>>a.p.s about your religious beliefs.
>> Nope -- just refuse to discuss them in that forum.
>>
>> One notes that *you* have not answered any questions on the topic
>> either.
>You can discuss them in this forum.
Away from the people that asked them? Why?
>> And you're *still* running from those dozen reposts.
>You made no such re-post.
Try telling another lie, lamer:
They've been reposted three times already, and you've run each and
every time.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Roger wrote:
>>>> Still can't think for yourself, huh?
>>>>
>>>> And still running as well.
>>>Truth hurts don't it...
>> Evidently -- that's why you avoid it at all costs.
>>>Btw, I see that you're still running from the questions posed to you in
>>>a.p.s about your religious beliefs.
>> Nope -- just refuse to discuss them in that forum.
>>
>> One notes that *you* have not answered any questions on the topic
>> either.
>You can discuss them in this forum.
Away from the people that asked them? Why?
>> And you're *still* running from those dozen reposts.
>You made no such re-post.
Test User
news:1719088.8c6bCpoZjC@(FreeBSD)...
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <3921479.jf4G2dpddT@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com>,
> >> > Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> >> >> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
> >> >>
> >> >> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
> >> >
> >> > and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that is.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >> >
> >>
> >> Never heard of the guy.....
> >
> > Of course not. Because you're an ignorant little hater.
> >
> > Yet that didn't stop you from posting an offensive article about Andrea
> > Dworkin ... who I'm sure you had ALSO never heard of. But some "aryan"
> > told you she was bad, so you bought it.
> >
> > Sara
> >
>
Tommy, you're too funny. As if *you* know anything about feminism, or what
women think.
> and the crap that evil whore Dworkin
> taught.
>
> Yes indeed, feminism was invented, at least in its dysfunctional modern
> form. Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of the
> hearth and home.
And were often legally regarded as chattel.
> If you had asked most of them how they regarded their
> lives, they'd have told you that they were happy and satisfied with their
> traditional roles.
Really. And you know this, how, exactly?
You really should get out of your room and actually meet people, Tommy.
It's possible you might learn something.
<snip crap>
-pk
Way The Fuck Back Jack
>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of the
>> hearth and home.
>
>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
Patrick Keenan
news:42605918...@news.prodigy.net...
Depends on the culture in question.
Were you trying to make a point?
-pk
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <3921479.jf4G2dpddT@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> > In article <O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com>,
> >> > Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> >> >> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
> >> >>
> >> >> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
> >> >
> >> > and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that is.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >> >
> >>
> >> Never heard of the guy.....
> >
> > Of course not. Because you're an ignorant little hater.
> >
> > Yet that didn't stop you from posting an offensive article about Andrea
> > Dworkin ... who I'm sure you had ALSO never heard of. But some "aryan"
> > told you she was bad, so you bought it.
> >
> > Sara
> >
>
> Learn some of the facts about feminism and the crap that evil whore Dworkin
> taught.
>
Here's a little newsflash for you, Baby Tommy. I went to a college with
one of the best Womens Studies departments in the country, Sarah
Lawrence College.
You wouldn't know about it. It doesn't have a football team, and one
needed to have an SAT score higher that 7 to get in.
I have forgotten more about feminism than you will ever know in your
entire life.
And by the way, Dworkin's main colleague, Kathleen MacKinnon, isn't
Jewish.
> Yes indeed, feminism was invented, at least in its dysfunctional modern
> form. Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of the
> hearth and home. If you had asked most of them how they regarded their
> lives, they'd have told you that they were happy and satisfied with their
> traditional roles. Was this arrangement "fair" to women? That's the wrong
> question to ask. The important thing is: it worked. While we had a
> patriarchal society, our race was vigorous, and we were a strong people.
> Feminism might have given more choices to women, but it weakened the race
> as a whole, and it reduced the happiness of women. Feminism is "gender
> Marxism," and like all kinds of Marxism, its drawbacks are worse than its
> advantages. Feminism gave men and women conflicting interests; they were no
> longer teammates, but competitors belonging to opposing teams. The quality
> of life became worse for both sexes as the result of feminism; that is, as
> the result of Jewish meddling in a White culture ostensibly for the sake of
> "fairness," but in reality to demoralize and to weaken the family bonds of
> the host people.
>
> Your question implies that the changes in traditional Western culture that
> the Jews have made are some kind of "standard" to which departures are in
> need of "justification." That is a false belief. Our old culture was better
> for us, generally speaking, than the one that your people have had a large
> part in creating. America was a better place in 1900 than it was in 2000,
> despite the invention of technology during the 20th century. Human genetic
> quality is most important; cultural fitness is next; and the comforts of
> civilization, such as electricity and washing machines, are of much less
> importance. Given its predecessor, the successor will tend to follow,
> unless a strong disturbing force interferes.
>
> And I don't think that Karl Marx had good intentions. Yes, he was Jewish,
> and the grandson of a rabbi. He wrote, though I forget to whom, that
> communism would deliver gentile nations into the hands of the Jews.
>
> http://www.jabpage.org/posts/zohar.html
colonel_...@yahoo.com.au
> >
> Here's a little newsflash for you, Baby Tommy. I went to a college
with
> one of the best Womens Studies departments in the country, Sarah
> Lawrence College.
>
> You wouldn't know about it. It doesn't have a football team, and one
> needed to have an SAT score higher that 7 to get in.
>
>
> I have forgotten more about feminism than you will ever know in your
> entire life.
>
> And by the way, Dworkin's main colleague, Kathleen MacKinnon, isn't
> Jewish.
singer famous for her album The Sands Of Time?
Hmmmm, you are right, you do appear to have forgotten rather a lot
about feminism.
Or perhaps your college was that crash hot to begin with.
colonel_...@yahoo.com.au
Another fine example of Holocaust scholarship in action.
Sara Salzman
colonel_...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
> > >
> > Here's a little newsflash for you, Baby Tommy. I went to a college
> with
> > one of the best Womens Studies departments in the country, Sarah
> > Lawrence College.
> >
> > You wouldn't know about it. It doesn't have a football team, and one
> > needed to have an SAT score higher that 7 to get in.
> >
> >
> > I have forgotten more about feminism than you will ever know in your
> > entire life.
> >
> > And by the way, Dworkin's main colleague, Kathleen MacKinnon, isn't
> > Jewish.
> And who, my dear, is Kathleen MacKinnon?
You are correct. I meant Catherine MacKinnon.
> The great Scottish folk
> singer famous for her album The Sands Of Time?
>
> Hmmmm, you are right, you do appear to have forgotten rather a lot
> about feminism.
It's been a long time.
>
> Or perhaps your college was that crash hot to begin with.
Could you please translate that sentence into English?
Sara
beastl...@doglover.com
> In article <3921479.jf4G2dpddT@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Sara Salzman wrote:
> >
> > > In article <O96dnW5RIKe...@rogers.com>,
> > > Gord McFee <gord....@rogers.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 4/14/2005 8:04 AM, digger wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > HERITAGE FRONT FOUNDER REPORTEDLY SHOT DEAD
> > >> > WebPosted Wed Apr 13 19:08:29 2005
> > >>
> > >> No longer "reportedly". He is deader than a doornail.
> > >
> > > and very few will weep. Other than the little child Tommy, that
is.
> > >
> > > Sara
> > >
> >
> > Never heard of the guy.....
>
> Of course not. Because you're an ignorant little hater.
>
> Yet that didn't stop you from posting an offensive article about
Andrea
> Dworkin ... who I'm sure you had ALSO never heard of. But some
"aryan"
> told you she was bad, so you bought it.
I didn't like many of the things that Andrea stood for. Such as banning
pornography. (Andrea never seemed to get the fact that women use porn
too... not just the Evil Oppressive Patriarchy. Oh, and the Nazis
banned porn.) Or equating consensual sex with rape. Or pretending that
women are always innocent victims... we can never be naughty, don'tcha
know. However, I derive no pleasure from her death. And I never had any
problem with her being Jewish. Or un-Barbielike in her physical
proportions. Andrea was a beautiful (if often misguided) person. I
can't say the same for any neo-Nazi.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Actually, whigger, I was asking a question.
And still haven't gotten an answer.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <4260ee5d...@news.newshosting.com>:
Yes, you did -- it just wasn't the one you wanted.
Here is the answer again: "Depends on the culture in question."
Now, was there a point you wanted to make?
Or are you just going to start forging again?
Way Back Jack
>There are lots of cities where the black population is low but crime is high
> such as Dallas and lots of cities where black population is high but crime is low.
Last time I checked, the black population of Dallas was 25%.
At any rate, show us lots of those cities over 75,000 where black
population is under 10% but suffer high crime, and those where black
population is 25% or more and enjoy low crime rates.
In other words, the opposite of the trends shown here:
Safest Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/
1. Amherst, N.Y 3.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=91
2. Newton, Mass. 2.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Newton-Massachusetts.html
3. Mission Viejo, Calif. 1.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Mission-Viejo-California.html
4. Cary, N.C. 6.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Cary-North-Carolina.html
5. Brick Township, N.J. (Less than 1% as computed by dividing 75,325
population into 751 blacks)
http://www.co.ocean.nj.us/planning/databook/09RACE2000.htm
6. Simi Valley, Calif. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Simi-Valley-California.html
7. Sunnyvale, Calif. 2.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sunnyvale-California.html
8. Colonie, N.Y. 3.5%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Colonie-New-York.html
9. Sterling Heights, Mich. 1.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Sterling-Heights-Michigan.html
10. Clarkstown, N.Y 7.9%
http://www.epodunk.com/cgi-bin/popInfo.php?locIndex=409
____________________
Most Dangerous Cities (75,000 or more) per
http://advertisers.americancityandcounty.com/ar/government_amherst_ny_tops/
1. Detroit 81.6%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Detroit-Michigan.html
2. Atlanta 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Atlanta-Georgia.html
3. St. Louis 51.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/St.-Louis-Missouri.html
4. Baltimore 64.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Baltimore-Maryland.html
5. Gary, Ind. 84.0%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Gary-Indiana.html
6. Camden, N.J. 53.3%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Camden-New-Jersey.html
7. Tampa 26.1%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Tampa-Florida.html
8. West Palm Beach, Fla. 32.2%
http://www.city-data.com/city/West-Palm-Beach-Florida.html
9. Compton, Calif. 40.3% (White non-Hispanic 1.0%)
http://www.city-data.com/city/Compton-California.html
10. Memphis, Tenn. 61.4%
http://www.city-data.com/city/Memphis-Tennessee.html
Patrick Keenan
news:4260ee5d...@news.newshosting.com...
Agenda noted.
> I was asking a question.
Which I answered. But combined with your obvious agenda, you are most
likely trying to make some disparaging point, deny it as you will.
> And still haven't gotten an answer.
And yet more denial! Yes, you have. Look up. But your question was
hopelessly vague, so you shouldn't expect a specific answer.
If you acutally do want to learn about this topic , might I suggest that you
acquaint yourself with this thing called "Google".
Or, read books and attend lectures.
-pk
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <1992847.PqzPgPBu1z@(FreeBSD)>:
>Patrick Keenan wrote:
>> "Way Back Jack" <Ja...@DaHood.org> wrote in message
>> news:4260ee5d...@news.newshosting.com...
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:08 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>>> wrote:
>>>>"Way The Fuck Back Jack" <I'm_with_...@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:42605918...@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:17 -0400, "Test User" <te...@dev.null> wrote:
>>>>>>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>>>>>>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> hearth and home.
>>>>>>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
>>>>> And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
>>>>Depends on the culture in question.
>>>>
>>>>Were you trying to make a point?
>>> Actually, whigger,
>> Agenda noted.
>Want to see a black agenda? Here it is.....
Want to see tommikins run? Keep running, tommie gump...
>Violent Sexual Assault at Predominantly Black High School
>Report; Posted on: 2005-04-15 11:57:21 [ Printer friendly ]
Okay -- what about this makes the crime a "black agenda," other than
your ideological need for it to be so?
And why are you continuing to run from the posts you *asked* for,
coward?
Patrick Keenan
> Patrick Keenan wrote:
>
>> "Way Back Jack" <Ja...@DaHood.org> wrote in message
>> news:4260ee5d...@news.newshosting.com...
>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:08 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Way The Fuck Back Jack" <I'm_with_...@home.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:42605918...@news.prodigy.net...
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:17 -0400, "Test User" <te...@dev.null> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>>>>>>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration
>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>> hearth and home.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
>>>>>
>>>>> And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
>>>>
>>>>Depends on the culture in question.
>>>>
>>>>Were you trying to make a point?
>>>
>>> Actually, whigger,
>>
>> Agenda noted.
>>
>
Not necessarily: an incident is not an agenda.
>
> Violent Sexual Assault at Predominantly Black High School
> Report; Posted on: 2005-04-15 11:57:21 [ Printer friendly ]
>
> Disabled girl was beaten and forced into sexual acts; school is 92% Black.
Now all you have to do is to show how this is an "agenda", assuming you know
what an agenda *is*.
Do you think that sort of thing never happened at other schools of any other
demographic description?
-pk
<snippage>
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Patrick Keenan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>>>>>>>>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration
>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>> hearth and home.
>>>>>>>>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
>>>>>>> And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
>>>>>>Depends on the culture in question.
>>>>>>Were you trying to make a point?
>>>>> Actually, whigger,
>>>> Agenda noted.
>>> Want to see a black agenda? Here it is.....
>> Not necessarily: an incident is not an agenda.
> Lets just call it natural behavior.
Why is that lie any better than the original one?
>>> Violent Sexual Assault at Predominantly Black High School
>>> Report; Posted on: 2005-04-15 11:57:21 [ Printer friendly ]
>>>
>>> Disabled girl was beaten and forced into sexual acts; school is 92%
>>> Black.
>> Now all you have to do is to show how this is an "agenda", assuming you
>> know what an agenda *is*.
>I wouldn't call it an agenda persay,
Except that you did.
"Persay" -- you really need to work on *not* using words you don't
know.
>'Da Brutha's' be doing what come naturally to them.
Like your lying?
Why do you think no one notices you running away from those dozen re
posts?
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>"Way Back Jack" <Ja...@DaHood.org> wrote in message
>news:4260ee5d...@news.newshosting.com...
>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:52:08 -0400, "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Way The Fuck Back Jack" <I'm_with_...@home.net> wrote in message
>>>news:42605918...@news.prodigy.net...
>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:17 -0400, "Test User" <te...@dev.null> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Before feminism, White people had a culture in which women became
>>>>>> mothers, had babies, raised children, and saw to the administration of
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> hearth and home.
>>>>>
>>>>>And were often legally regarded as chattel.
>>>>
>>>> And how did blacks treat their wimmen folk, Butch?
>>>
>>>Depends on the culture in question.
>>>
>>>Were you trying to make a point?
>>
>> Actually, whigger,
>
>Agenda noted.
A whigger complaining about agenda?
Oh, the irony.
>> I was asking a question.
>
>Which I answered. But combined with your obvious agenda, you are most
>likely trying to make some disparaging point, deny it as you will.
>
>> And still haven't gotten an answer.
>
>And yet more denial! Yes, you have. Look up. But your question was
>hopelessly vague, so you shouldn't expect a specific answer.
>
>If you acutally do want to learn about this topic , might I suggest that you
>acquaint yourself with this thing called "Google".
>
>Or, read books and attend lectures.
Dunno about googles, but here's the way the gubamint says blacks treat
wimmen folk, relative to whites:
Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
(...)
Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
(...)
Patrick Keenan
Agenda displayed.
If you're referring to "government", which one? And you do realize that
when you specify one, you're also specifying a culture, of course.
>
> Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
>
> (...)
>
> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>
> (...)
>
> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
And this applies to the entire world exactly how?
-pk
Patrick Keenan
Why? You just called it an agenda.
>
>>> Violent Sexual Assault at Predominantly Black High School
>>> Report; Posted on: 2005-04-15 11:57:21 [ Printer friendly ]
>>>
>>> Disabled girl was beaten and forced into sexual acts; school is 92%
>>> Black.
>>
>> Now all you have to do is to show how this is an "agenda", assuming you
>> know what an agenda *is*.
>
> I wouldn't call it an agenda persay,
Except that you just did. Did you forget already?
> 'Da Brutha's' be doing what come naturally to them.
And you think that's never happened in schools of any other demographic
description?
> Zimbabwe is rape and murder capital of the world. They rape babies over
> there because they think it cures HIV. (Go figure) Besides, didn't I
> already tell you that blacks should be observed in their natural habitat?
No, you did not. Are you referring to earth?
http://www.raceandhistory.com/cgi-bin/forum/webbbs_config.pl/noframes/read/1099
> A monkey raised in a zoo will act differently than one raised in the wild.
> If one wants to study monkeys, you study them in their natural habitat.
> If you want to study black behavior - without White addmixture, than you
> need not look any further than Zimbabwe or Haiti.
Based on your criteria, those would *not* be the places to look, because of
the influence of whites. But I suppose you are also ignorant of the
actions of whites in Africa.
You might find it enlightening to read about King Leopold of Belgium.
>> Do you think that sort of thing never happened at other schools of any
>> other demographic description?
>
>
> Has it?
Yes.
> Cite please.
Still too lazy to do your own work?
http://www.collegian.psu.edu/archive/2003/04/04-15-03tdc/04-15-03dnews-09.asp
http://zerointelligence.net/archives/000209.php
http://www.justicewomen.com/letters_analy_high_rape.html
http://www.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=42096
http://www.nbc17.com/education/2947237/detail.html
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24096
http://webits3.appstate.edu/apples/life/Rape/Gang_Rape.htm
http://cambodia.ahrchk.net/mainfile.php/news200304/595/
It's also not unknown in other institutions:
http://www.koaa.com/features/investigates/view.asp?ID=2031
http://www.nswrapecrisis.com.au/Information%20Sheets/I-have-a-history-of-mental-illness.htm
> In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -
So you might try actually looking for the truth, instead of swallowing what
you are being fed.
Ah... and you were about to tell us how you can speak for all the women who
were regarded as chattel?
HTH
-pk
> George Orwell, 1984
Way Back Jack
wrote:
To which country/gubamint do you think this thread pertains?
>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>
>And this applies to the entire world exactly how?
Oh, did you want me to include the rapes in sub-Saharan Africa?
Patrick Keenan
news:4261b496...@news.prodigy.net...
You're the one who is trying to drag the thread off into another direction.
If you look back, it doesn't specify one. It says "White people had a
culture". That could be a fairly large number of countries and
governments. And depends on how you define "white".
Now, are you going to try to tell us you can speak for all the women who
were - and are - regarded as chattel?
>>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
>>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>>
>>And this applies to the entire world exactly how?
>
> Oh, did you want me to include the rapes in sub-Saharan Africa?
How about rape statistics in predominantly white, or other countries?
That would be more on-topic.
-pk
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Patrick Keenan wrote:
>> How about rape statistics in predominantly white, or other countries?
>> That would be more on-topic.
>So, you would like to compare 'rape statistics' of a predominantly white
>country like Iceland & Norway to that of predominantly black country like
>Zimbabwe?
No, to one that has been as "racially" isolated as Iceland and Norway.
>Are you sure you want to go down that road?
Are you?
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Actually, I'm the one limiting the discussion to the US of A.
As did the original poster.
>If you look back, it doesn't specify one. It says "White people had a
>culture". That could be a fairly large number of countries and
>governments. And depends on how you define "white".
I think that you're the one who needs to look back.
Instead of throwing up smoke screens in an effort to escape.
>Now, are you going to try to tell us you can speak for all the women who
>were - and are - regarded as chattel?
I'm speaking not for anyone; rather I'm speaking about American women.
Incidentally, American women weren't complaining about chattel when we
males were being drafted out of college into Vietnam while they went
marching-off to job interviews.
>
>>>> Black/White Street Crime Ratios:
>>>>
>>>> (...)
>>>>
>>>> Forcible Rape: 2.89/1
>>>>
>>>> (...)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime4.pdf
>>>
>>>And this applies to the entire world exactly how?
>>
>> Oh, did you want me to include the rapes in sub-Saharan Africa?
>
>How about rape statistics in predominantly white, or other countries?
>That would be more on-topic.
If you want to broaden the discussion to other countries, I don't
care.
If you want to post data about white rape, I don't care about that
either.
Gord McFee
> LOL, how soon until the other co-founder Grant Bristow follows?
>
> Oh wait, it turns out Grantie is now a "hero" (there word)
"there word"?
You are starting to spell more like Ross Cummins every day.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
colonel_...@yahoo.com.au
Gord McFee wrote:
> On 4/15/2005 1:35 AM, colonel_...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>
> > LOL, how soon until the other co-founder Grant Bristow follows?
> >
> > Oh wait, it turns out Grantie is now a "hero" (there word)
>
>
> "there word"?
>
> You are starting to spell more like Ross Cummins every day.
On Mondays, Wednesday and Fridays I am Ewan Jackson. On Tuesdays,
Thursdays and Saturdays I am Ross Cummins. And on Sundays I am Kurt
Knoll.
"He was more than just one man, he was half the bloody side"
As we like to say in Oz.
steve wolk
<colonel_...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:1113793144.8...@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Gord McFee wrote:
>> On 4/15/2005 1:35 AM, colonel_...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>
>> > LOL, how soon until the other co-founder Grant Bristow follows?
>> >
>> > Oh wait, it turns out Grantie is now a "hero" (there word)
>>
>>
>> "there word"?
>>
>> You are starting to spell more like Ross Cummins every day.
> Well spotted.
> On Mondays, Wednesday and Fridays I am Ewan Jackson. On Tuesdays,
> Thursdays and Saturdays I am Ross Cummins. And on Sundays I am Kurt
> Knoll.
You are scum EVERY day.
Gord McFee
> Gord McFee wrote:
>
>>On 4/15/2005 1:35 AM, colonel_...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
>>
>>>LOL, how soon until the other co-founder Grant Bristow follows?
>>>
>>>Oh wait, it turns out Grantie is now a "hero" (there word)
>>
>>"there word"?
>>
>>You are starting to spell more like Ross Cummins every day.
>
> Well spotted.
> On Mondays, Wednesday and Fridays I am Ewan Jackson. On Tuesdays,
> Thursdays and Saturdays I am Ross Cummins. And on Sundays I am Kurt
> Knoll.
What a horrible way to have to go through life. You have my sympathy.
Patrick Keenan
> Patrick Keenan wrote:
>
>
>> How about rape statistics in predominantly white, or other countries?
>> That would be more on-topic.
>>
>> -pk
>
> country like Iceland & Norway to that of predominantly black country like
> Zimbabwe?
You see, Tommy, it's very easy to mislead - or simply lie - with statistics.
If you're going to compare groups, you have to have some real depth as a
basis for comparison. Otherwise you could easily find that you're
comparing apples and tractors.
Comparing Iceland and Zimbabwe in this way isn't valid because Iceland has
been its own country for quite some time. Zimbabwe does not match most of
the categories that could be used to make the comparison.
Now, if you wanted to make a comparison just based on 'whiteness', why not
have a look at juvenile delinquency rates in Germany in the mid and late
30's? There, rapes seemed to be partly encouraged by the pornography
pasted to lamp posts. Guess what it was? Der Steurmer. That's what
Aryan children often got for sex-ed.
-pk
>
>
> --
> In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. -
> George Orwell, 1984
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>"Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:20624528.Jjvke2OSGb@(FreeBSD)...
>> Patrick Keenan wrote:
>>
>>
>>> How about rape statistics in predominantly white, or other countries?
>>> That would be more on-topic.
>>>
>>> -pk
>>
>> So, you would like to compare 'rape statistics' of a predominantly white
>> country like Iceland & Norway to that of predominantly black country like
>> Zimbabwe?
>> Are you sure you want to go down that road?
>
>You see, Tommy, it's very easy to mislead - or simply lie - with statistics.
>If you're going to compare groups, you have to have some real depth as a
>basis for comparison. Otherwise you could easily find that you're
>comparing apples and tractors.
>
>Comparing Iceland and Zimbabwe in this way isn't valid because Iceland has
>been its own country for quite some time. Zimbabwe does not match most of
>the categories that could be used to make the comparison.
The latest left wing excuse.
>Now, if you wanted to make a comparison just based on 'whiteness', why not
>have a look at juvenile delinquency rates in Germany in the mid and late
>30's? There, rapes seemed to be partly encouraged by the pornography
>pasted to lamp posts. Guess what it was? Der Steurmer. That's what
>Aryan children often got for sex-ed.
So tell us about the rape rates there in the 30s.
Then do try to come back to the present.
Joe Bruno
Way Back Jack wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:56:21 +0000, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Learn some of the facts about feminism and the crap that evil whore
Dworkin
> >taught.
>
>
> Is she the dyke who said that marriage was legitimatized rape?
>
> So many people from right-wing fundy Christians to leftist black
> activists and damn near everybody in between blame society's woes in
> large part on the collapse of the two-parent family structure.
Alot of noise is made in that direction by very vocal people, but I
doubt it is justified or even a majority view. This "family values"
song and dance is something the politicians cooked up to get themselves
reelected. It sounds good, like motherhood and apple pie, but it's just
an empty platitude. As most platitudes are, it's overly simplistic- a
simple explanation for a number of very complex forces.
Society's woes are caused by poor morals and irrational behavior in
people.
I know of quite a few mentally ill and crooked people who had two
legitimate parents. More and more research is telling us that mental
illness is strongly influenced by genetics-caused by chemical
imbalances in the brain. It is this
little fact that accounts for many similarities in behavior between
parents and their offspring. The child's values are strongly influenced
by his early environment, too. Perfectionistic parents filled with
anxiety transmit these characteristics to their children. My parents
were like that and all three of their children have these
characteristics in abundance.
In my experience, a child is happier and better adjusted with one happy
parent than he is with two who aren't.
>
> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the first
amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
Joe Bruno
Way Back Jack wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:56:21 +0000, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
> >Learn some of the facts about feminism and the crap that evil whore
Dworkin
> >taught.
>
> Andrea "The Dork" Dworkin?
>
> Is she the dyke who said that marriage was legitimatized rape?
There's one big difference-a woman consents to marriage and she knows
in advance it includes sex with her husband.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Tell it to your dyke feminist friends.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
>
The black out of wedlock rate is 70% and single parent rate is 60-70%.
Anyone with any sense will tell you that it's difficult raising a kid
with two caring parents, much harder with one.
You can't tell me that the black-white educational gap isn't affected
by these circumstances. When pap is out spreading his seed all over
town, instead of staying home making little LaRue and Eboneesha study
their lessons, it's no wonder they're fucking up in school. What kind
of example is that for chilluns?
>>
>> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
>
>Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the first
>amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
You oughta just be grateful you got away from alt.native with your ass
intact. For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
posts.
Joe Bruno
You're changing the subject. Your claim was that two parents raise
better adapted kids than a single parent, not that one is more
difficult than the other.
>
> You can't tell me that the black-white educational gap isn't affected
> by these circumstances.
I won't try, but you have no statistics to support your theory. Your
armchair theorizing has nothing to do with the real world.
When pap is out spreading his seed all over
> town, instead of staying home making little LaRue and Eboneesha study
> their lessons, it's no wonder they're fucking up in school. What
kind
> of example is that for chilluns?
I had two parents, both white, and neither of them ever put pressure on
me to do my homework or study, so your point is a red herring. I
happened to
be a fast learner with a mind that is photographic for some things I
read, so I didn't have to study much. My sister and brother had the
same situation.
> >>
> >> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
> >
> >Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the first
> >amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
>
> You oughta just be grateful you got away from alt.native with your
ass
> intact.
Is that a threat? Pardon me if I don't run for help. I've got a big
sword collection, and I use it to discourage bullies. One of my
two-handed Claymores is 59 inches high. I practice with it almost
daily.
For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
> posts.
I think you simply made a mountain out of a molehill, as you often do.
You are, in the strictest sense, a solipsist. You're one of those
stumpy people who will never admit you are wrong, even if it's obvious
to everyone else.
Joe Bruno
Way Back Jack wrote:
> On 21 Apr 2005 06:59:02 -0700, "Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Way Back Jack wrote:
> >> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 15:56:21 +0000, Tommy <nos...@nospam.com>
wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >Learn some of the facts about feminism and the crap that evil
whore
> >Dworkin
> >> >taught.
> >>
> >> Andrea "The Dork" Dworkin?
> >>
> >> Is she the dyke who said that marriage was legitimatized rape?
> >
> >There's one big difference-a woman consents to marriage and she
knows
> >in advance it includes sex with her husband.
> >
>
> Tell it to your dyke feminist friends.
I don't know anyone like that. Where do you get this stupid shit?
Way Back Jack
Way Back Jack
wrote:
You're dreaming. I said that people from both sides of the
sociopolitical spectrum, from black preachers in da hood to rednecks
in the sticks, attribute much of society's woes to the collapse of
the caring, two-parent family.
>> You can't tell me that the black-white educational gap isn't affected
>> by these circumstances.
>
>I won't try, but you have no statistics to support your theory. Your
>armchair theorizing has nothing to do with the real world.
It's my opinion .... and the opinion of many others.
And to tell ya the truth, I seem to remember someone in alt.education
posting some stats in support of same.
> When pap is out spreading his seed all over
>> town, instead of staying home making little LaRue and Eboneesha study
>> their lessons, it's no wonder they're fucking up in school. What
>kind
>> of example is that for chilluns?
>
>
>I had two parents, both white, and neither of them ever put pressure on
>me to do my homework or study, so your point is a red herring. I
>happened to
>be a fast learner with a mind that is photographic for some things I
>read, so I didn't have to study much. My sister and brother had the
>same situation.
And my widowed, immigrant granny raised five children by scrubbing
floors, without any "relief" or whatever they called welfare back
then. 4 of those 5 earned college degrees including one with honors
at West Point.
But that doesn't mean that your experience and my dad's family's
experience are microcosms of typicality.
>> >>
>> >> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
>> >
>> >Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the first
>> >amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
>>
>> You oughta just be grateful you got away from alt.native with your
>ass
>> intact.
>
>Is that a threat? Pardon me if I don't run for help. I've got a big
>sword collection, and I use it to discourage bullies. One of my
>two-handed Claymores is 59 inches high. I practice with it almost
>daily.
I've never seen a bad assed white liberal. Even if you're 6'8" and
350 with 10% body fat, you always fold when push comes to shove.
>
> For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
>> posts.
>
>I think you simply made a mountain out of a molehill, as you often do.
>You are, in the strictest sense, a solipsist. You're one of those
>stumpy people who will never admit you are wrong, even if it's obvious
>to everyone else.
Hey, I agree with what you told them. If not for the Euro "invasion,"
they'd still be stealing ponies from each other, making poopy in
holes, communicating with smoke signals and grunts, and living to the
ripe old age of 33.
Instead, they're allowed dual citizenship, monopolized casinos,
freedom from State sales tax, and affirmative action.
But they let your fat ass off the hook easily. You should see some of
the skirmishes they had with me.
Joe Bruno
That's not the point you made, dumbass. You talked about how difficult
it is.
>
>
> >> You can't tell me that the black-white educational gap isn't
affected
> >> by these circumstances.
> >
> >I won't try, but you have no statistics to support your theory. Your
> >armchair theorizing has nothing to do with the real world.
>
> It's my opinion .... and the opinion of many others.
One of my Navy seniors said it: Opinions are like assholes-everybody
has one.
>
> And to tell ya the truth, I seem to remember someone in alt.education
> posting some stats in support of same.
>
> > When pap is out spreading his seed all over
> >> town, instead of staying home making little LaRue and Eboneesha
study
> >> their lessons, it's no wonder they're fucking up in school. What
> >kind
> >> of example is that for chilluns?
> >
> >
> >I had two parents, both white, and neither of them ever put pressure
on
> >me to do my homework or study, so your point is a red herring. I
> >happened to
> >be a fast learner with a mind that is photographic for some things I
> >read, so I didn't have to study much. My sister and brother had the
> >same situation.
>
> And my widowed, immigrant granny raised five children by scrubbing
> floors, without any "relief" or whatever they called welfare back
> then. 4 of those 5 earned college degrees including one with honors
> at West Point.
>
> But that doesn't mean that your experience and my dad's family's
> experience are microcosms of typicality.
They are until you copme up with statistics. Damn, you are dense.>
> >> >>
> >> >> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
> >> >
> >> >Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the
first
> >> >amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
> >>
> >> You oughta just be grateful you got away from alt.native with your
> >ass
> >> intact.
> >
> >Is that a threat? Pardon me if I don't run for help. I've got a big
> >sword collection, and I use it to discourage bullies. One of my
> >two-handed Claymores is 59 inches high. I practice with it almost
> >daily.
>
> I've never seen a bad assed white liberal.
I'm not a liberal, you idiot. I vote Republican all the way. I already
told ya that, but you're too fucking stupid to remember.
Even if you're 6'8" and
> 350 with 10% body fat, you always fold when push comes to shove.
Come on over, Tough guy, and we'll find out. I think I already said
that, but you backed out.
> >
> > For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
> >> posts.
> >
> >I think you simply made a mountain out of a molehill, as you often
do.
> >You are, in the strictest sense, a solipsist. You're one of those
> >stumpy people who will never admit you are wrong, even if it's
obvious
> >to everyone else.
>
> Hey, I agree with what you told them. If not for the Euro
"invasion,"
> they'd still be stealing ponies from each other, making poopy in
> holes, communicating with smoke signals and grunts, and living to the
> ripe old age of 33.
>
> Instead, they're allowed dual citizenship, monopolized casinos,
> freedom from State sales tax, and affirmative action.
>
> But they let your fat ass off the hook easily.
You wanna see how fat my ass is, putz? Come on over and we'll discuss
this shit in person. My address has been posted numerous times. You
talk tough but that's all you do.
Joe Bruno
You're a fucking liar unless you can prove I said I know someone like
that. Damn, you are stupid.
Ben Cramer
"Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:1114127441.6...@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Joey, every time you open you gob, you confirm the fact you are a dickhead.
>
Ben Cramer
threat to the community.
Ben Cramer
>
> You wanna see how fat my ass is, putz? Come on over and we'll discuss
> this shit in person. My address has been posted numerous times. You
> talk tough but that's all you do.
Joey, you're too fucking old to be a threat to anyone not domiciled in a
wheel chair. Even then the odds would be even.
And they let idiots like you roam the streets?
Is it any wonder you get (or will soon get) visits from the local
constabulary.
>
Joe Bruno
Ben Cramer wrote:
> "Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> news:1114130076.5...@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> >
> > You wanna see how fat my ass is, putz? Come on over and we'll
discuss
> > this shit in person. My address has been posted numerous times. You
> > talk tough but that's all you do.
>
> Joey, you're too fucking old to be a threat to anyone not domiciled
in a
> wheel chair. Even then the odds would be even.
Stop talking and come on over. Let's see if you have the balls to do
anything besides talk.
>
>
Way Back Jack
wrote:
She's one of your ilk's heroes, along with Michael Moore, Je$$e,
Dirgible Ted, etc.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
It is difficult. It was certainly more difficult for my grandmother
to raise 5 after her old man died at a young age. She had to scrub
floors to support 'em while the 15 year-old daughter had to be a
mother to 4 boys.
>> >> You can't tell me that the black-white educational gap isn't
>affected
>> >> by these circumstances.
>> >
>> >I won't try, but you have no statistics to support your theory. Your
>> >armchair theorizing has nothing to do with the real world.
>>
>> It's my opinion .... and the opinion of many others.
>
>One of my Navy seniors said it: Opinions are like assholes-everybody
>has one.
I hear single parents complain bitterly about the difficulties of
raising kids. Never heard one of 'em say it's easier.
>> And to tell ya the truth, I seem to remember someone in alt.education
>> posting some stats in support of same.
>>
>> > When pap is out spreading his seed all over
>> >> town, instead of staying home making little LaRue and Eboneesha
>study
>> >> their lessons, it's no wonder they're fucking up in school. What
>> >kind
>> >> of example is that for chilluns?
>> >
>> >
>> >I had two parents, both white, and neither of them ever put pressure
>on
>> >me to do my homework or study, so your point is a red herring. I
>> >happened to
>> >be a fast learner with a mind that is photographic for some things I
>> >read, so I didn't have to study much. My sister and brother had the
>> >same situation.
>>
>> And my widowed, immigrant granny raised five children by scrubbing
>> floors, without any "relief" or whatever they called welfare back
>> then. 4 of those 5 earned college degrees including one with honors
>> at West Point.
>>
>> But that doesn't mean that your experience and my dad's family's
>> experience are microcosms of typicality.
>
>
>They are until you copme up with statistics. Damn, you are dense.>
I don't know of stats that measure comparative degrees of difficulty.
You had two parents (so did I) so our experiences are worthless. As
explained above, my dad's family's upbringing was more difficult when
one parent was gone. As also mentioned, I hear tales of woe from
single parents.
You must have rocks in your head to believe otherwise.
>> >> >> And this cunt comes along with her loony ideas.
>> >> >
>> >> >Are you practicing censorship now? Have you tried reading the
>first
>> >> >amendment to the Constitution lately? I recommend it.
>> >>
>> >> You oughta just be grateful you got away from alt.native with your
>> >ass
>> >> intact.
>> >
>> >Is that a threat? Pardon me if I don't run for help. I've got a big
>> >sword collection, and I use it to discourage bullies. One of my
>> >two-handed Claymores is 59 inches high. I practice with it almost
>> >daily.
>>
>> I've never seen a bad assed white liberal.
>
>I'm not a liberal, you idiot. I vote Republican all the way. I already
>told ya that, but you're too fucking stupid to remember.
Most repubs are liberal too, just not as liberal as democrats. Your
views are quite liberal girly-man even if you vote Repub.
> Even if you're 6'8" and
>> 350 with 10% body fat, you always fold when push comes to shove.
>
>Come on over, Tough guy, and we'll find out. I think I already said
>that, but you backed out.
Do you realize how ridiculous you sound. You know nothing about my
physical capabilities or potential violence I can produce.
At any rate, for a long time, I act only in self-defense.
>> > For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
>> >> posts.
>> >
>> >I think you simply made a mountain out of a molehill, as you often
>do.
>> >You are, in the strictest sense, a solipsist. You're one of those
>> >stumpy people who will never admit you are wrong, even if it's
>obvious
>> >to everyone else.
>>
>> Hey, I agree with what you told them. If not for the Euro
>"invasion,"
>> they'd still be stealing ponies from each other, making poopy in
>> holes, communicating with smoke signals and grunts, and living to the
>> ripe old age of 33.
>>
>> Instead, they're allowed dual citizenship, monopolized casinos,
>> freedom from State sales tax, and affirmative action.
>>
>> But they let your fat ass off the hook easily.
>
>You wanna see how fat my ass is, putz? Come on over and we'll discuss
>this shit in person. My address has been posted numerous times. You
>talk tough but that's all you do.
Spoken like a true juvenile. No, girly-man, at this stage of the
game, I don't want any beef with the law.
Ben Cramer
constabulary are interested in you.
Joe Bruno
TALK, TALK,TALK, TALK. ROTFL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> At any rate, for a long time, I act only in self-defense.
TRANSLATION:I'M YELLOW THROUGH AND THROUGH
>
> >> > For some reason, the Indians over there must have missed your
> >> >> posts.
> >> >
> >> >I think you simply made a mountain out of a molehill, as you
often
> >do.
> >> >You are, in the strictest sense, a solipsist. You're one of those
> >> >stumpy people who will never admit you are wrong, even if it's
> >obvious
> >> >to everyone else.
> >>
> >> Hey, I agree with what you told them. If not for the Euro
> >"invasion,"
> >> they'd still be stealing ponies from each other, making poopy in
> >> holes, communicating with smoke signals and grunts, and living to
the
> >> ripe old age of 33.
> >>
> >> Instead, they're allowed dual citizenship, monopolized casinos,
> >> freedom from State sales tax, and affirmative action.
> >>
> >> But they let your fat ass off the hook easily.
> >
> >You wanna see how fat my ass is, putz? Come on over and we'll
discuss
> >this shit in person. My address has been posted numerous times. You
> >talk tough but that's all you do.
>
> Spoken like a true juvenile. No, girly-man, at this stage of the
> game, I don't want any beef with the law.
Tell me that to my face, pussy.
Way Back Jack
wrote:
Actually, I'm white through and through.
Not just on the outside, twinky.
Bring your face around.