Why Isn't McVay In London?
Rip
trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
witness of some kind for the defense.
Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
blasted from across the big pond?
What would be his area of expertise anyway?
Do tell us Ken!
Rip
Rip
OBC) wrote:
>In article <cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com>,
>Rip <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote:
>>While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
>>trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
>>it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
>>witness of some kind for the defense.
>
>That is probably because I am not an expert with respect to the
>Holocaust.
>
>>Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
>>hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
>>blasted from across the big pond?
>>
>>What would be his area of expertise anyway?
>>
>>Do tell us Ken!
>>
>
>Certainly - I'm an expert at dealing with twits.
Well, that being the case it is obvious the defense certainly does not
have any need for your particular expertise in Law Court 73 and that's
for sure!
Rip
Kenneth McVay OBC
Rip <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote:
>While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
>trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
>it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
>witness of some kind for the defense.
That is probably because I am not an expert with respect to the
Holocaust.
>Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
>hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
>blasted from across the big pond?
>
>What would be his area of expertise anyway?
>
>Do tell us Ken!
>
Certainly - I'm an expert at dealing with twits.
--
The Nizkor Project An Electronic Holocaust Education Resource
RealVideo Filmclips http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/bergen-belsen
from the liberated http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/nordhausen
camps of Nazi Germany http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/mauthausen
David Gehrig
<< snip >>
> >>What would be his area of expertise anyway?
> >>
> >>Do tell us Ken!
> >>
> >
> >Certainly - I'm an expert at dealing with twits.
>
> Well, that being the case it is obvious the defense certainly does not
> have any need for your particular expertise in Law Court 73 and that's
> for sure!
True enough -- Irving's tying himself in knots without any help.
@%<
> Rip
Doc Tavish
On 31-Jan-2000, kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
> In article <cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com>,
> Rip <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote:
> >While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
> >trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
> >it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
> >witness of some kind for the defense.
> That is probably because I am not an expert with respect to the
> Holocaust.
Now let us put this in proper perspective. Irving has admitted that he's no expert
but yet he is being ridiculed left and right by the Jews and their brain dead Gentile
dupes yet on the other hand we see an ex gas station attendant, Ken aka Kendra
McVay freely admit as he did above: "I am not an expert with respect to the
Holocaust" yet somehow McVay is supposed to be more credible than Irving?
The hypocrisy of Jews and their stooges is revolting!
Doc Tavish
Sara Salzman
--
The American Guardian
http://www.thundernet.org
"Rip" <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote in message
news:cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com...
> While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
> trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
> it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
> witness of some kind for the defense.
>
> Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
> hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
> blasted from across the big pond?
>
> What would be his area of expertise anyway?
>
> Do tell us Ken!
>
> Rip
Rip
<zem...@antihormeltref.arthlink.nt.e.e> wrote:
>Rip wrote:
>>
>> On 1 Feb 2000 02:36:11 GMT, kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay
>> OBC) wrote:
>
><< snip >>
>
>> >>What would be his area of expertise anyway?
>> >>
>> >>Do tell us Ken!
>> >>
>> >
>> >Certainly - I'm an expert at dealing with twits.
>>
>> Well, that being the case it is obvious the defense certainly does not
>> have any need for your particular expertise in Law Court 73 and that's
>> for sure!
>
>True enough -- Irving's tying himself in knots without any help.
Looks like David Irving and this trial has you little guys spooked
pretty bad!
Rip :-)
>@%<
>
>> Rip
Rip
<pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
Well, you just may be right about that! That never crossed my mind.
And as the old saying goes, " all work and no play......."
Rip
Jeffrey G. Brown
Ellis" <pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
And you've been asked why you lie and forge, Gutless Donnie.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Orac
<pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
Or they might ask you why you persistently forge other people's names in the
posts of your headers.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."--Orac
a.k.a. |
David Gorski|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"--Orac again
David Gehrig
Dream on. Whenever a loon like Irving decides to self-destruct in public,
it's a cause for celebration. Not to mention laughter.
@%<
> >@%<
> >
> >> Rip
Chris Tucker
Rip <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote in message
news:cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com...
> While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
> trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
> it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
> witness of some kind for the defense.
1. Ken never claimed to be a historian, unlike Irving who has compared
himself to other persecuted "historians" such as Salman Rushdie who is a
*novelist*. (In a quote listed in the LA Times, Jan. 7, 2000).
2. When Ken *did* go to London Irving was no where to be seen. Irving had
threatened to sue Ken if he set foot on British soil. Ken did, but no
Irving. Irving was apparently doing exhaustive research on how to draw a
line in the sand without bothering to ask permission to pertinent archives.
> What would be his area of expertise anyway?
Ken's area of expertise is in identifying bullshit, which is how he spotted
Irving. From the transcripts posted, however, Judge Gray can also spot
bullshit and has already noticed the stench emanating from Irving's seat. It
doesn't look like Ken is going to get an all-expenses paid trip to London on
the wallet of David Irving who is going to be paying legal fees to Lipstadt.
Sara Salzman
>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
>
>
>--
>The American Guardian
>http://www.thundernet.org
>
Forwarded to:
j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com, ab...@Mail.com
>
>"Rip" <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote in message
>news:cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com...
>> While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
>> trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
>> it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
>> witness of some kind for the defense.
>>
>> Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
>> hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
>> blasted from across the big pond?
>>
>> What would be his area of expertise anyway?
>>
>> Do tell us Ken!
>>
>> Rip
--
In article <85ir3...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
Calling me a "nazi-boy" is as much of defamation as you can make.
As for FACTS- I have what I need. You can count on it "Fatbroad".
Sara Salzman
<Or...@mac.com> wrote:
>In article <VXtl4.8704$ox5.2...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Sara Salzman"
><pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
>
>>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
>
>Or they might ask you why you persistently forge other people's names in the
>posts of your headers.
>
Don't bother to ask, just forward them to:
j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com, ab...@Mail.com
--
Hate Watch
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-010...@ts004d48.den-co.concentric.net...
> In article <Orac-3316EE.0...@news.earthlink.net>, Orac
> <Or...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <VXtl4.8704$ox5.2...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Sara Salzman"
> ><pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
> >
> >>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
> >
> >Or they might ask you why you persistently forge other people's names in
the
> >posts of your headers.
> >
>
>
> Don't bother to ask, just forward them to:
>
> j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com, ab...@Mail.com
>
--
Hate Watch of America
http://www.hatewatch.com
Hate Watch
Sara Salzman
<comm...@hatewatch.com> wrote:
Forgery forwarded to j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com,
ab...@Mail.com, spamcom...@cw.net
Sara Salzman
<comm...@hatewatch.com> wrote:
Forgery forwarded to j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com,
Hate Watch
--
Hate Watch of America
http://www.hatewatch.com
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-010...@ts004d39.den-co.concentric.net...
> In article <IxIl4.10696$ox5.3...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Hate Watch"
> <comm...@hatewatch.com> wrote:
>
> >"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >news:catamont-010...@ts004d48.den-co.concentric.net...
> >> In article <Orac-3316EE.0...@news.earthlink.net>, Orac
> >> <Or...@mac.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <VXtl4.8704$ox5.2...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Sara
Salzman"
> >> ><pro...@innocent.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>They might ask him if he is a homosexual.
> >> >
> >> >Or they might ask you why you persistently forge other people's names
in
> >the
> >> >posts of your headers.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Don't bother to ask, just forward them to:
> >>
> >> j...@SEARK.NET, ab...@bcandid.com, ab...@innocent.com, ab...@Mail.com
> >>
> >Yes, please forward them.
> >
> >
> >--
> >Hate Watch of America
> >http://www.hatewatch.com
>
Hate Watch
go ahead..send me an e-mail to comm...@hatewatch.com
--
Hate Watch of America
http://www.hatewatch.com
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-010...@ts004d39.den-co.concentric.net...
> In article <pHIl4.10712$ox5.3...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Hate Watch"
> <comm...@hatewatch.com> wrote:
>
> >Ken could be waiting on his boyfriend.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >"Rip" <nos...@nom.deplume> wrote in message
> >news:cmgc9s054c7relcc7...@4ax.com...
> >> While reading the latest transcript of the Irving - Lipstadt libel
> >> trial taking place in London, and the testimony of expert witnesses,
> >> it occurred to me that Ken McVay hasn't been summoned as an expert
> >> witness of some kind for the defense.
> >>
> >> Maybe he is on standby to go to London later. Does he have a ticket in
> >> hand to respond mecurically when the clarion call for his services is
> >> blasted from across the big pond?
> >>
> >> What would be his area of expertise anyway?
> >>
> >> Do tell us Ken!
> >>
> >> Rip
>
Orac
<comm...@hatewatch.com> wrote:
>Hello fat bitch, you did it again...I own the domains
Yeah, but I highly doubt you own the upstream provider. Say goodnight, Gracie.