DAVID MICHAEL SUPPORTS CHILDREN VIEWING PORNOGRAPHY
NAZIHUNTER
SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
DETAILS
--
Anon news web interface. FAQ available for review at:
http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
NAZIHUNTER
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <2000033101...@cotse.com> in alt.revisionism, on Thu, 30
Mar 2000 20:09:28 -0500 (EST), "NAZIHUNTER" <anon...@cotse.com>
wrote:
>SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
>DETAILS
Yes. We sort of figured all that out for ourselves, thank you very
much.
But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they will
learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have learned how
to be bullies and thugs from you.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOSnkZQgvG272fn9EQKVsQCggwo7tY+OAN65Xl5YUhBWo+O1kkwAn0eO
gXPZY5bOHTxs4L8yI5lKn7kk
=XEE7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Doc Tavish
<John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <2000033101...@cotse.com> in alt.revisionism, on Thu, 30
>Mar 2000 20:09:28 -0500 (EST), "NAZIHUNTER" <anon...@cotse.com>
>wrote:
>
>>SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
>>DETAILS
>Yes. We sort of figured all that out for ourselves, thank you very
>much.
>
>But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
>Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
>stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they will
>learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have learned how
>to be bullies and thugs from you.
>
>- --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
Now we have John Morris admitting that Nazihunter has committed crimes
such as "harassing telephone calls."
John have you ever heard of a person named Michael Fourtier? He was
convicted for complicity in the Oklahoma City Bombing. Though he had
no active part in the bombing he "knew" of the plot and didn't report
the plot to law enforcement and by his very own inaction he got a
conviction against him! Why do I bring this up you may ask? You know
who Nazihunter is yet you will not identify him! Remember e-mailing me
this and posting it too?
Received: from edtnps04.telusplanet.net (edtnps04.telusplanet.net
[198.161.157.104]) by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP
id EAA08800 for <sonn...@flash.net>; Sat, 18 Dec 1999 04:55:21 -0600
(CST) Received: from edtn004843.hs.telusplanet.net
([161.184.155.17]:2083 "HELO edtn004843.hs.telusplanet.net") by
smtp1.telusplanet.net with SMTP id <S23618AbPLRKxe>; Sat, 18
Dec 1999 03:53:34 -0700
From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
To: sonn...@flash.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:53:59 -0700
Organization: University of Alberta
Reply-To: John....@UAlberta.CA
Message-ID: <gbpm5sskjsi6t3pls...@4ax.com>
References: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
<83ei53$i3r$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: 17fc94b3bcce63f6d0de4bddc530dedb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In <83ei53$i3r$1...@nnrp1.deja.com> in alt.revisionism, on Fri, 17 Dec
1999 23:48:52 GMT, doc_t...@my-deja.com wrote:
>In article <1999121500...@cotse.com>,
> "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
>> Anonymously posted.
>> The following is the address for Doc Tavish
[snip]
>> Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
>> Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
>Now that is what I call a threat.
Indeed it is a threat. It also a criminal offence to utter such a
threat.
One thing I want to make perfectly. I regard you as a lying,
Jew-hating sack of shit. If anything ever happened to you, I would
not shed a tear. I do not want to be your friend. I don't like you.
Nevertheless, if you lay a criminal charge, I will give a responsible
police authority evidence which may help identify your attacker.
Please advise the FBI that the threat probably originated in Canada.
That way they will know to get in touch with Canadian police.
When the police ask you how to get in touch with me, e-mail me, and I
will tell you. Do not e-mail me until then.
Posted and e-mailed to sonn...@flash.net for information only.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
~~~End of E-mail~~~
Your Nazihunter made a direct threat and even you admitted he broke
the law yet you do not report him! Does this not make you an accessory
to criminal acts in the same manner of Michael Fourtier? What do you
think your superiors would believe?
Also you have never answered this question and it is rather complex--
My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain. An
unscrupulous individual obtained it by using his position as an
attorney to obtain such under false pretenses. He had claimed to my
ISP that he needed the info for litigation-- he instead distributes it
to his mailing list and he had stated that he had never posted it.
(All of this is on file.) Since his distribution I have had direct
death threats which are still being made and some have been
investigated and are in law enforcement files complete with
Southwestern Bell Telco logs. In the same manner of Michael Fourtier
would this not make a certain unethical lawyer an accessory to federal
crimes? Are not death threats made by telephone over state lines a
federal crime John? These crimes absolutely would not have been
possible without my personal info being obtained and distributed by
your co-hort's personal mailing list. Do I also detect that the RICO
statutes may apply as well? I still have all the e-mail from your
fellow Nizkooks harassing and intimidating me about a certain
deposition. I ask again-- does RICO ring a bell?
As for your libelous:
>But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
>Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
>stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they will
>learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have learned how
>to be bullies and thugs from you.
Who really are the bullies and thugs John? What about a person who is
supposed to be a respectable Professor at a University consorting with
someone they admit has committed crimes or a lawyer that gives over
private information to a mailing list whose recipients then engage in
documented federal crimes? You are libelous, self righteous and evil.
You and the rest of your ilk are evil in my eyes. Don't think that you
will be getting away with your peccadillos either. No threat at all. I
will use the criminal justice system and not some sort of self
righteous vigilante actions like you and your fellow criminals use!
Your superiors are going to be informed of your activities ASAP.
Doc Tavish
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <38e54ca3....@news.newsguy.com> in alt.revisionism, on Sat,
01 Apr 2000 01:38:08 GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
wrote:
>On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:27:13 GMT, John Morris
><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>>In <2000033101...@cotse.com> in alt.revisionism, on Thu, 30
>>Mar 2000 20:09:28 -0500 (EST), "NAZIHUNTER" <anon...@cotse.com>
>>wrote:
>>>SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
>>>DETAILS
>>Yes. We sort of figured all that out for ourselves, thank you very
>>much.
>>But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
>>Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
>>stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they
>>will learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have
>>learned how to be bullies and thugs from you.
>Now we have John Morris admitting that Nazihunter has committed
>crimes such as "harassing telephone calls."
What admitting? I'm merely taking you and several of his other
victims at your word. Didn't you say publicly he had telephoned you?
>John have you ever heard of a person named Michael Fourtier? He was
>convicted for complicity in the Oklahoma City Bombing. Though he had
>no active part in the bombing he "knew" of the plot and didn't
>report the plot to law enforcement and by his very own inaction he
>got a
>conviction against him! Why do I bring this up you may ask? You know
>who Nazihunter is yet you will not identify him! Remember e-mailing
>me this and posting it too?
Learn to read, you idiot. Read the post you quoted below:
I will give a responsible police authority evidence which
may help identify your attacker.
Now, what does *may* mean to you? What does "responsible police
authority" mean to you? Are you a "responsible police authority"?
Are the readers of alt.revisionism "responsible police authority"?
At the end of the day, it has been eighteen months since Nazihunter
stopped posting from Marduk's account and disappeared into mixmasters
and anonymous remailers. My information is pretty stale at this
point.
Why has not one of you morons taken me up on my offer and filed a
criminal complaint? What the hell is the matter with you people?
>[snip]
> ~~~End of E-mail~~~
>Your Nazihunter
Not my Nazihunter, buddy.
> made a direct threat and even you admitted he broke
>the law yet you do not report him!
I'm not his victim. Why don't you report him? Why don't you give my
name to the police as material witness? Why are you such a whining
pussy?
> Does this not make you an accessory
>to criminal acts in the same manner of Michael Fourtier? What do you
>think your superiors would believe?
I think that my "superiors" would believe that you are an imbecile.
>Also you have never answered this question and it is rather
>complex--
Oh, fuck you. I have so answered it.
>My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain. An
>unscrupulous individual obtained it by using his position as an
>attorney to obtain such under false pretenses.
I know of no such individual. I am given to understand that the
information was obtained so that you could be notified of legal
action against you and that he information was so used.
> He had claimed to my
>ISP that he needed the info for litigation-- he instead distributes
>it to his mailing list and he had stated that he had never posted
>it.
Correct. AFAIK, he did use the inform to notify you of a lawsuit
against you and that he did not post it publicly. Kn McVay posted it
publicly, but unfortunately an hour or so after the timestamp on the
first Nazihunter posts.
>(All of this is on file.) Since his distribution I have had direct
>death threats which are still being made and some have been
>investigated and are in law enforcement files complete with
>Southwestern Bell Telco logs.
I suspect that's just a lot of hot air. I doubt very much whether
you have filed a complaint.
> In the same manner of Michael Fourtier
>would this not make a certain unethical lawyer an accessory to
>federal crimes?
Why are you asking me? I'm not a lawyer. Get a lawyer, you boob.
> Are not death threats made by telephone over state lines a
>federal crime John?
I imagine that they are, but why are you asking me? I'm not a
lawyer.
> These crimes absolutely would not have been
>possible without my personal info being obtained and distributed by
>your co-hort's personal mailing list.
Perhaps, but you would have to prove proximate cause against Yale
Edeiken.
I have seen the mailing list. That is also a matter of record. No
one on that list is Nazihunter. I know of no connection between
anyone on that list and Nazihunter except possibly Ken McVay, but he
denies that Marduk is Nazihunter.
> Do I also detect that the RICO
>statutes may apply as well? I still have all the e-mail from your
>fellow Nizkooks harassing and intimidating me about a certain
>deposition. I ask again-- does RICO ring a bell?
I understand that it is some racketeering legislation, but I am not
an American either.
>As for your libelous:
>>But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
>>Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
>>stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they
>>will learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have
>>learned how to be bullies and thugs from you.
>Who really are the bullies and thugs John?
Did I not make myself clear?
> What about a person who is
>supposed to be a respectable Professor at a University consorting
>with someone they admit has committed crimes
First off, I'm not a professor. Second, I haven't consorted with
Nazihunter. And how can make that accusation after I publicly
offered you my help?
> or a lawyer that gives over
>private information to a mailing list whose recipients then engage
>in documented federal crimes?
But I don't know that. I don't how your address got to Nazihunter.
If I did, I would post the information because I hate this shit
whether it comes from Don Ellis or David Michael or Nazihunter.
> You are libelous, self righteous and evil.
Get stuffed.
>You and the rest of your ilk are evil in my eyes. Don't think that
>you will be getting away with your peccadillos either. No threat at
>all. I will use the criminal justice system and not some sort of
>self
>righteous vigilante actions like you and your fellow criminals use!
Go take your idle threats and stuff them where the sun don't shine.
>Your superiors are going to be informed of your activities ASAP.
What activities? You're going to invade my privacy and make wild
accusations because I offered to help you?
Go away, and stalk somebody else.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOWdvpQgvG272fn9EQInOQCgqHZO3NwSSqS9z7UorRGiv49SOaIAoIqL
jtc2+LhBkQcATQ1upRWoSIYT
=Jwjw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Doc Tavish
On 1-Apr-2000, John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
> Oh, fuck you.
I don't believe in homosexual trysts John. Try Ken McVay or Jeffrey G. Brown!
Doc Tavish
--
Die Juden sind under Ungluck
Brimstone
Brimstone
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
an0...@hotmail.com
Tavish, all you are is a hateful racist bigot.
Nothing more, and everything less.
You foment hatred, spout lies, and act like an idiot.
You are disgusting, and you are un-American, and inhuman.
Getting the picture here???
"Business?!? *mankind* was my business!!"
-The ghost of Jacob Marley to Scrooge "A Christmas Carol"
By Charles Dickens
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net,
doc_t...@my-deja.com) wrote:
>Your Nazihunter made a direct threat and even you admitted he broke
>the law yet you do not report him!
Why would anyone want to deprive you of the pleasure of pestering your
local law enforcement buddies again, O Gutless One?
> [...deletia...]
>Also you have never answered this question and it is rather complex--
>My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain.
Baloney, Cockroach Boy. You've posted it yourself.
> [...deletia...]
>I still have all the e-mail from your
>fellow Nizkooks harassing and intimidating me about a certain
>deposition.
Which deposition, of course, you lacked the guts to show up for. That, of
course, surprised no one.
> [...deletia...]
>Who really are the bullies and thugs John?
You and your sock puppets, of course, Cockroach Boy.
> [...deletia...]
>I will use the criminal justice system and not some sort of self
>righteous vigilante actions like you and your fellow criminals use!
You won't do jack shit, little worm. You've been threatening legal action
for years, and when push came to shove, you chickened out and ran home to
Mommy and Daddy rather than stand up in court. You'll go on whining and
threatening, but you won't take any action that might require you to
appear in public and be held accountable for your actions.
That's just the sort of craven dog you are, Scottie, and you might as well
get used to the fact that we all know it.
>Your superiors are going to be informed of your activities ASAP.
I'm certain they'll all have a big laugh at your expense, Cockroach Boy --
especially when you sign a fake name to your accusations. They'll end up
shitcanned, just like your credibility.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <8c4a3...@news1.newsguy.com> in alt.revisionism, on Sat, 1 Apr
2000 07:57:13 GMT, "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>On 1-Apr-2000, John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>> Oh, fuck you.
>I don't believe in homosexual trysts John. Try Ken McVay or Jeffrey
>G. Brown!
> Doc Tavish
So basically by not responding to my reply to your threats to harass
me, you show that you had no intention of prosecuting me for offering
to help you and that all your threats against me were simply an
attempt to intimidate me.
I knew that, but it was good of you to demonstrate it.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
What you didn't want to deal with:
<quote0>
>>>SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
>>>DETAILS
>[snip]
> ~~~End of E-mail~~~
>Your Nazihunter
Not my Nazihunter, buddy.
Get stuffed.
</quote>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOZXd5QgvG272fn9EQL4YACg0q9AwCYxjONZgP01Mw1F25Bq5eMAnAqf
P/P+9+hNALazogWDOOpJY2OG
=PRbn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Buck Turgidson
> Morris and Ragland would make a good couple.
Run out of sockpuppets, Dirty Donnie?
-- --Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
Like short-haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html
Yale F. Edeiken
Defendant Scott Bradbury<sonn...@flash.net> dribbled in message
news:38e54ca3....@news.newsguy.com...
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:27:13 GMT, John Morris
> <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>
> >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >In <2000033101...@cotse.com> in alt.revisionism, on Thu, 30
> >Mar 2000 20:09:28 -0500 (EST), "NAZIHUNTER" <anon...@cotse.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>SEE WWW.HOMESTEAD.COM/NAZIHUNTER1 FOR
> >>DETAILS
>
> >Yes. We sort of figured all that out for ourselves, thank you very
> >much.
> >
> >But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
> >Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
> >stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they will
> >learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have learned how
> >to be bullies and thugs from you.
> Now we have John Morris admitting that Nazihunter has committed crimes
> such as "harassing telephone calls."
He always has, you asshole.
He even offered to help you:
> Nevertheless, if you lay a criminal charge, I will give a responsible
> police authority evidence which may help identify your attacker.
> Please advise the FBI that the threat probably originated in Canada.
> That way they will know to get in touch with Canadian police.
>
> When the police ask you how to get in touch with me, e-mail me, and I
> will tell you. Do not e-mail me until then.
> Posted and e-mailed to sonn...@flash.net for information only.
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
>
> ~~~End of E-mail~~~
> Your Nazihunter made a direct threat and even you admitted he broke
> the law yet you do not report him!
He left that to you. You didn't.
> Does this not make you an accessory
> to criminal acts in the same manner of Michael Fourtier?
Nope. He offered to help you.
>What do you
> think your superiors would believe?
When they see that your response was the equally criminal act of making
a death threat, they would appluad his actions/
> Also you have never answered this question and it is rather complex--
> My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain.
It is now.
> An
> unscrupulous individual obtained it by using his position as an
> attorney to obtain such under false pretenses.
That's a lie. Support it or retract it.
> He had claimed to my
> ISP that he needed the info for litigation
That's a lie. No such representation was ever made.
>-- he instead distributes it
> to his mailing list
Of people victimized by your criminal and actionable satements.
> and he had stated that he had never posted it.
I =never did.
> (All of this is on file.) Since his distribution I have had direct
> death threats which are still being made and some have been
> investigated and are in law enforcement files complete with
> Southwestern Bell Telco logs.
Now you know how the vicitms of your criminal activity feel.
> In the same manner of Michael Fourtier
> would this not make a certain unethical lawyer an accessory to federal
> crimes?
Absolutely not. And you statement is actionable as defamation.
Support it or retract it.
>Are not death threats made by telephone over state lines a
> federal crime John?
And have you not done so for three solid years?
Will you actually walk into court and swear to tell the truth and then
deny sending this e-mail to me:
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
Will you walk into court and swear to te;ll the truth and then deny
having threatened to sexually violate Sara Salzaman, torture her to death,
and then mutilate her body.
> These crimes absolutely would not have been
> possible without my personal info being obtained and distributed by
> your co-hort's personal mailing list.
That's a lie.
> Do I also detect that the RICO
> statutes may apply as well?
Nope. You have been hanging out with legal ignoramuses again.
> I still have all the e-mail from your
> fellow Nizkooks harassing and intimidating me about a certain
> deposition.
Another lie. No e-mail was ever sent to about the deposition.
It should also be noted that sanctions have been imposed upon defendant
Bradbury for his violation of a court order requiring his attendence at the
deposition.
A court has ordered him to send me a certified check in four figures as
a sanction for his violation.
> I ask again-- does RICO ring a bell?
Against the court which found that you violated its orders?
I don't think so, Defendant Bradbury.
> As for your libelous:
> >But in many ways you are worse than the David Michaels and Don
> >Ellises and Scott Bradburys of the world. They have not so far
> >stooped to the level of making harassing phone calls. But they will
> >learn. They are, after all, your creatures. They have learned how
> >to be bullies and thugs from you.
>
> Who really are the bullies and thugs John?
You. And your accomplices.
> What about a person who is
> supposed to be a respectable Professor at a University consorting with
> someone they admit has committed crimes or a lawyer that gives over
> private information to a mailing list whose recipients then engage in
> documented federal crimes?
You are lying again.
> You are libelous, self righteous and evil.
Telling the truth about a thug like you is never libel.
> You and the rest of your ilk are evil in my eyes. Don't think that you
> will be getting away with your peccadillos either. No threat at all. I
> will use the criminal justice system and not some sort of self
> righteous vigilante actions like you and your fellow criminals use!
Make us all laugh Defendant Bradbury. It was you who has found to have
violated court orders.
Does the concept "bench warrant ring a bell.
> Your superiors are going to be informed of your activities ASAP.
And, one can only hope, that the lawsuit against you will follow hours
later. Then you can be found in contempt of court in Canada as a well as
the US.
Oh, yes. Only a certifed check is acceptable.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/