WHY ARE WEB-NAZIS SUCH DEADBEATS?
NAZIHUNTER
NOTICE: This message may not have originated from the Sender address
above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
This message sender's real identity is unknown, unlogged, and is
probably not replyable via the Sender address above (YMMV).
Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
administrator at <abuse at mixmaster dot shinn dot net>.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott Bradbury: unemployed, sucks welfare from working folks, at
the same time pretending to have assets like a cessna....and, oh yeah, he
rents for the "tax advantages" (snicker).
Don Ellis: deadbeat bankrupt, together with his wife, judy, even stiffed
his vet for $175.00, at the same time pretending that he too has rental
properties.
I guess to trailer-trash nazis, RENTAL PROPERTY is the holy grail of which
wet nazi dreams are made.
I say, kill em all
Doc Tavish
nmaster.kpnqwest.net!newsfeed.Austria.EU.net!anon.lcs.mit.edu!nym.alias.net!mail2news
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 15:29:15 -0400
Sender: Anonymous Sender <nob...@mixmaster.shinn.net>
Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
Subject: WHY ARE WEB-NAZIS SUCH DEADBEATS?
From: NAZIHUNTER <nob...@see.message.headers>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Message-ID: <875ab4d9ea91558f...@mixmaster.shinn.net>
Mail-To-News-Contact: postm...@nym.alias.net
Organization: mail...@nym.alias.net
Lines: 23
On Tue, 16 May 2000 15:29:15 -0400, NAZIHUNTER
<nob...@see.message.headers> wrote:
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>NOTICE: This message may not have originated from the Sender address
>above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software.
>
>This message sender's real identity is unknown, unlogged, and is
>probably not replyable via the Sender address above (YMMV).
>
>Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer
>administrator at <abuse at mixmaster dot shinn dot net>.
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Scott Bradbury: unemployed, sucks welfare from working folks,
I have not received one welfare check. The tax-payers are not
out one cent.
>at the same time pretending to have assets like a cessna
What I have or not have is not one damned bit of your business!
>....and, oh yeah, he rents for the "tax advantages" (snicker).
You won't be snickering all that much longer. You've left clues all over
leading to you.
>Don Ellis: deadbeat bankrupt, together with his wife, judy, even stiffed
>his vet for $175.00, at the same time pretending that he too has rental
>properties.
>I guess to trailer-trash nazis,
Just another reason why non-Jews should look at Jews with different eyes.
If Jews were the working man's true friends why do they malign so many
people who live in mobile homes? Your hypocrisy shows.
>RENTAL PROPERTY is the holy grail of which
>wet nazi dreams are made.
>
>I say, kill em all
Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been established
that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
university?
Doc Tavish
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On Tue, 16 May 2000 15:29:15 -0400, NAZIHUNTER
><nob...@see.message.headers> wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>at the same time pretending to have assets like a cessna
>
>What I have or not have is not one damned bit of your business!
Translation: Cockroach Boy got caught telling a whopper of a lie, and
would prefer that everyone forget about the proof of is dishonesty.
Ain't gonna happen, O Gutless One. You lied about owning a plane. Your
credibility is shot. I'm gonna rub your nose in it every chance I get.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Blakely
from the Government along with free medical insurance. Jealous
Nazihunter?
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3921dd73....@news.flash.net...
:
> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been established
> that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
> university?
Another actionable lie from Defendant "I don't need to obey no court
order" Bradbury who wrote me the following missive
You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
charactiture of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his
basically incoherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a
notorious liar and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter
dishonesty and include such criminal activities as forging the posts of
others and issuing death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed
his lies with sexual molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is,
of course, not a word of truth in the venom he spews so freely.
For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Doc Tavish
<S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3921dd73....@news.flash.net...
>> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been established
>> that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
>> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
>> university?
> Another actionable lie from Defendant....
No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
mailing list!
You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
On Tue, 16 May 2000 01:14:29 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<Vh1U4.3322$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920996d...@news.flash.net...
>> On Mon, 15 May 2000 23:32:01 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>> >news:39208100...@news.flash.net...
>>
>> Lurkers please note the "news:39208100...@news.flash.net"
>> it's very pertinent.
[...]
>> And you distributed it via your e-mailing list.
> Liar. I have no e-mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> >> and then illegally distributed it via your own personal mailing list!
>> > Incorrect. There is no such mailing list.
How do you explain what you have posted in the recent past included once
again below?
>> If that is so then why did you delete the following from the post to which
>> you now reply?
> Because your continued frantic lies are boring.
Here once again and all compared to your claims above let us count your
lies. You claim above: "I have no e-mailing list.... There is no such
mailing list."
You did mention these key words in a previous posting you
made didn't you ol' criminal pathological liar you: "As all the recipients
of the e-mail... ...I gave the information to a list of people..." Looks
like I've caught you in even more lies doesn't it Yale? Once again from
the top criminal-- did you or did you not say the following?
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:26:56 -0500
NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-9-4.enter.net
Message-ID: <385e...@news3.enter.net>
X-Trace: 20 Dec 1999 11:27:29 -0500, atmax-9-4.enter.net
Organization: Enter.Net
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:faxdOHnEHgDROZ...@4ax.com...
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
> >Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
> >news:J7pZOIj+KpQFqo...@4ax.com...
> >> I think it wrong to give Tavish's details to a list, (though I can understand the
> >> pressure that may have led him to do so)
(Edeiken speaks):
> > Save it for the next time you are running for office.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken did not deny giving
my details to a list as shown above. <<Lie #1 Exposed>>))
> It seems the best mitigation for your action to me.
(Edeiken speaks now in his "current" reply):
Nope. The best defense is the complete one. That it went to people
who had been victimized by Bradbury.
In fact, McVay's nonsense is just that. As all the recipients of the
e-mail except Ken knew was that there were then motions pending including
barring Bradbury from obtaining such material from me because of his
invasions of privacy and threats.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "As all the
recipients of the e-mail..." Who sent the e-mail to the list?
Yale F. Edeiken <<Lie #2 Exposed>>))
(Edeiken speaks):
> >I gave the information to a list of people who, almost without exception have
> >been the vicitims of threats of violence or criminal harassment from Bradbury. If
> >you ahve a problem with that, I could care less.
((Tavish comment May 15, 2000-- Notice Edeiken said precisely: "I gave the
information to a list of people" yet he now claims: "There is no such
mailing list.." <<Lie #3 Exposed>>))
> --YFE
~~~End of Edeiken Admission to Passing Out Confidential Information~~~
The above from my: Message-ID: <39208100...@news.flash.net>
Please compare the headers to see how Edeiken dodges disseminating
subpoenaed information via his personal mailing list! Why did you delete
your admission to distributing confidential information obtained via a
subpoena to your mailing list Yale?
I now ask the obvious-- what would have been the chance that Nazihunter
would have had it in his mind to check court records to get my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address as compared to you directly giving
it to him by way of him being a recipient of your e-mailing list which you
are now trying to distance yourself from having? Astronomical!
[...]
Doc Tavish
> --YFE
P.S. You were caught in three lies about your mailing list and here are
the three lies you told about how you got my confidential information.
Count the lies-- they number three!
Lurkers for the record again here is Yale F. Edeiken caught in three lies
about a subpoena:
[Notice that I have now tagged his lies with such "<<<LIE #1>>>"]
http://x21.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=608403278&fmt=text
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your
attempts to incite criminal harassment. <<<LIE #1>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my
civil rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now. <<<LIE #2>>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000-- do you now wish to continue your
denial now that I have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal
possession Yale? Please do! I want everyone to see what a liar and
disreputable lawyer you are!))
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=606542183&fmt=text
Subject: Re: See You In Court! ...
Date: 04/04/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cbsq...@news1.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Yale you and only you got my not in public domain information
> from Flash.Net after much duress made against them
That's a lie, criminal. <<<LIE #3>>>
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net"
"This subpoena was issued at the request of the following person:
Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID# 40290"
~~End of Edeiken on the Subpoena Issue~~
Need I say more?
BTW here's Ken McVay even giving evidence about how you "Nazihunter" got
my unlisted telephone number and unlisted address:
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <83bbpm$2jk4$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <38570B78...@btinternet.com>
X-Trace: news.tht.net 945369718 85636 216.126.72.25
(16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
Cc: ya...@enter.net,david.e...@btinternet.com
I don't like posting email as a rule, although I confess I have done,
but I have received email I consider somewhat abusive from Mr. Edeiken,
and am compelled to respond, and to do so initially by sharing his
outburst with you:
<!--Begin email cut and paste-->
I hope you're you fucking son of a bitch.
I suggest you mae some response to this.
Make it hard and make it fast.
--yfe
<!--End email cut and paste-->
<exact copy>
To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
address in the first place, shouldn't one?
Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list,
and to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to
condemn nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask
what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first
place?
~~~End of Archival Excerpt~~~
Need I say more?
Doc Tavish
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been
established
> >> that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
> >> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
> >> university?
>
> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
> mailing list!
I have no such "private mailing list."
It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
It appears that your mental disease includes as a synptom the inability
to comprehend the English language.
> Need I say more?
Yes. You still have to explain why you are, as other posters have
pointed out, ignoring outstandin court orders.
Doc Tavish
<iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
>> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been
>> >> established that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
>> >> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
>> >> university?
>> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
>> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
>> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
>> mailing list!
> I have no such "private mailing list."
>
> It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
The facts as archived at DejaCom say otherwise!
>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
group of people..."
Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
illegal activity!
You've been in denial lately too but now we all see your confession!
> --YFE
For the record here is what Ken McVay has said about your distribution:
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT
Organization: The Nizkor Project
Lines: 82
Message-ID: <83bbpm$2jk4$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <38570B78...@btinternet.com>
X-Trace: news.tht.net 945369718 85636 216.126.72.25
(16 Dec 1999 18:41:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: scr...@hub.org
Cc: ya...@enter.net,david.e...@btinternet.com
<exact copy>
To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
address in the first place, shouldn't one?
Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list,
and to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to
condemn nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask
what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first
place?
~~~End of Archival Excerpt~~~
> It appears that your mental disease includes as a synptom the inability
>to comprehend the English language.
>> Need I say more?
> Yes. You still have to explain why you are, as other posters have
>pointed out, ignoring outstandin court orders.
I can only tell you this spaz and it will be all that I say about your
"lawsuit" against me and all of its particulars-- I am not at liberty to
comment about any of it at this time. That is all.
Yale now continues to post his same psycho-babble which gives strong
evidence he has a mental disorder known as obsessive-compulsive disorder.
> The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
>Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
>deleted as the garbage that it is.
>
> Scott Bradbury of Bellville...
> --YFE
Doc Tavish
Sara Salzman
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
Check.
Certified.
or Jumpsuit.
The choice is yours.
Sara
--
"I am patient with stupidity, but not with those who are proud of it."
Edith Sitwell
Doc Tavish
>In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
>doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>
>Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
Wrong again anti-Christ-- if it was PUBLIC INFORMATION then why did
Edeiken have to subpoena it if it were in public domain? Distributing
confidential information is illegal Sara. You should check this out before
you start your pathetic porcine squealing.
>Check.
>Certified.
>or Jumpsuit.
>
>The choice is yours.
None of my choices little squealing sow! No check and no jumpsuit.
Doc Tavish
>Sara
Yale F. Edeiken
Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:39221529....@news.flash.net...
> On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> <iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
> > I have no such "private mailing list."
> >
> > It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
> The facts as archived at DejaCom say otherwise!
Nope. You just can't understand English.
Are you sure it's your native language?
> > None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
> >group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
> So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
> group of people..."
Sure. So what?
> Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
Ot's hardly news. Or illiegal. Or improper.
> The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
> information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
> illegal activity!
Wrong, asswipe. See a lawyer. It bacame publiuc as soon as the
subpoena was returned without objection.
> You've been in denial lately too but now we all see your confession!
Of what? Telling victims od criminal harassment the identity of the
perp?
Get real, asswipe.
\
> Compare what you just said above to what you just previously said:
It is exactly the same.
Learn to speak English.
> I can only tell you this spaz and it will be all that I say about your
> "lawsuit" against me and all of its particulars-- I am not at liberty to
> comment about any of it at this time. That is all.
It's no wonder tha everybody is laughing at you.
The remainder of this dishonest post from the diseased mind of Scott
Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) writing under the name of "Doc Tavish" is
deleted as the garbage that it is.
Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-know for the perverted
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>In article <3921dd73....@news.flash.net>, Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie
>"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
Once again you lie. You know that I've told you <sonn...@flash.net> is no
longer valid. That makes you a liar and purveyor of false information.
>>On Tue, 16 May 2000 15:29:15 -0400, NAZIHUNTER
>><nob...@see.message.headers> wrote:
>
>> [...deletia...]
>
>>>at the same time pretending to have assets like a cessna
>>What I have or not have is not one damned bit of your business!
>Translation: Cockroach Boy got caught telling a whopper of a lie, and
>would prefer that everyone forget about the proof of is dishonesty.
How is that? Once again you are relying on out of context quotes!
Here is the exact word for word interchange between your and Edeiken's
ally (whom neither of you have condemned) and me:
From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: WHY ARE WEB-NAZIS SUCH DEADBEATS?
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Reply-To: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
Message-ID: <3921dd73....@news.flash.net>
>Scott Bradbury: unemployed, sucks welfare from working folks,
I have not received one welfare check. The tax-payers are not
out one cent.
>at the same time pretending to have assets like a cessna
What I have or not have is not one damned bit of your business!
>....and, oh yeah, he rents for the "tax advantages" (snicker).
You won't be snickering all that much longer. You've left clues all over
leading to you.
>Don Ellis...
~~End of Exact Interchange~~
>Ain't gonna happen, O Gutless One. You lied about owning a plane.
I said nothing about ownership other than it's none of your friend's
business!
>Your credibility is shot.
Who really values your opinion?
>I'm gonna rub your nose in it every chance I get.
Who really cares? Once again you have to rely on out of context arguments
to make your case. Translation-- you're a loser!
Doc Tavish
>
>JGB
Sara Salzman
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On 17 May 2000 00:28:52 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>>In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
>>doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>>
>>Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
>
>Wrong again anti-Christ-- if it was PUBLIC INFORMATION then why did
>Edeiken have to subpoena it if it were in public domain? Distributing
>confidential information is illegal Sara. You should check this out before
>you start your pathetic porcine squealing.
>
Once the information is given out, it's PUBLIC, Moron.
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 17 May 2000 00:28:52 EDT, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
>
>Wrong again anti-Christ-- if it was PUBLIC INFORMATION then why did
>Edeiken have to subpoena it if it were in public domain?
Once it's obtained by subpoena, it becomes part of the court proceedings,
and is thus public information. Not all the whining in the world is going
to change that unhappy fact, Cockroach Boy.
>Distributing confidential information is illegal Sara.
The information supplied in response to the subpoena ceased to be
'confidential' the moment it was supplied, O Gutless One. Get used to it.
> [...deletia...]
>>Check.
>>Certified.
>>or Jumpsuit.
>>
>>The choice is yours.
>
>None of my choices little squealing sow! No check and no jumpsuit.
The courts see things differently, little wriggling cockroach.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown
"beat you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
>On 16 May 2000 21:30:21 -0500, jg_b...@my-deja.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
>wrote:
> [...deletia...]
>>Ain't gonna happen, O Gutless One. You lied about owning a plane.
>
>I said nothing about ownership other than it's none of your friend's
>business!
False. You have claimed to own your own Cessna.
A check of FAA records reveals that this is not the case.
You lied, Scottie. You got caught.
Now squeal.
>>Your credibility is shot.
>
>Who really values your opinion?
It's not an opinion, Cockroach Boy. It's a fact.
>>I'm gonna rub your nose in it every chance I get.
>
>Who really cares?
You do. That's why you keep lying. If you had the slightest inkling of how
stupid you look, you'd shut the hell up.
Stephen R Gould
"Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> Wrong again anti-Christ-- if it was PUBLIC INFORMATION then why did
> Edeiken have to subpoena it if it were in public domain?
It enters into the public domain following the subpoena. Duh.
SRG
Gord McFee
GMT, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish) wrote:
> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
>
> >Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >news:3921dd73....@news.flash.net...
>
> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been established
> >> that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an "e-mail list
> >> recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the campus life at the
> >> university?
>
> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
>
> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
> mailing list!
Tell it to Bubba, Defendant Bradbury. He likes bedtime stories. ROTFL!
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
su...@aol.com
hardworking Jews of this country are supporting you through their hard work.
Steve
su...@aol.com wrote:
>
> How about getting off your ass and working for a living? It seems that the
> hardworking Jews of this country are supporting you through their hard work.
I suspect he is talking about Social Security and Medicare. If his
Social Security payment is $1100/mo., it gives you some idea of how
little he earned while working. Idiots do not usually hold high-paying
jobs.
Steve
Orac
wrote:
>su...@aol.com wrote:
>>
>> How about getting off your ass and working for a living? It seems
>> that the hardworking Jews of this country are supporting you through
>> their hard work.
>
>I suspect he is talking about Social Security and Medicare. If his
>Social Security payment is $1100/mo., it gives you some idea of how
>little he earned while working. Idiots do not usually hold high-paying
>jobs.
Except, of course, if they work for the government....
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Steve
Score one for Doctor Dave. :>)
Steve