Voigt questions holocaust deaths and claims land back
Heinrich
number of Holocaust deaths and demanded the return of German land lost after
World War II, in an interview to be broadcast on Monday.
"Six million cannot be right. At most, 340,000 people could have died in
Auschwitz," Voigt said in excerpts from the interview that were released in
advance.
"The Jews always say: 'Even if one Jew died that is a crime.' But of course
it makes a difference whether one has to pay for six million people or for
340,000," the head of the National Democratic Party added.
Voigt also demanded the return of "Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, Western
Prussia, Eastern Prussia and Silesia, regardless of whether it is
Koenigsberg (Kaliningrad), Danzig (Gdansk) or Breslau (Wroclaw). "All these
cities are German in our view, and we demand to exercise our rights over
them."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/11/wnazi111.xml
Al Nakba
schwitz alone? there were other camps as well
It's all a bit strange
news:44414535-befa-4c8b-ada6-
0d55ee...@s19g2000prg.googlegr
oups.com:
shush! don't want to confuse them with facts.
Clue in to cramwich, schwitz is auschwitz.
It's all a bit strange
news:5s7pf1F...@mid.individual.net:
You see, if you weren't such a gutless German you could have
been the one doing this.
oneey...@gmail.com
> The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt, has questioned the
> number of Holocaust deaths
What a surprise... LOL
Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
--
Wotan
perfumeTheMovie
Define the term 'nazi' if you are able.
> --
> Wotan
perfumeTheMovie
Richard Warren
"perfumeTheMovie" <perfume...@live.ca> wrote in message
news:b3aeaf8e-8002-4a82...@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
How about you first define the "official version" of the Holocaust, Nazoid
hypocrite?
>
>
>> --
>> Wotan
>
Richard Warren
Let's hear your definition of the "offcial version" of the Holocaust, Nazoid
hypocrite.
>
>> --
>> Wotan
>
ElParedon
there is nothing "NeoNazi" about NPD. All you are trying to do is dictredit
German nationalists.
"Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote in message
news:5s7pf1F...@mid.individual.net...
It's all a bit strange
news:hfJ7j.19392$N67....@bignews5.bellsouth.net:
> Finally a German awakes to the lies being peddled by
> ZioNazis! And BTW there is nothing "NeoNazi" about NPD.
> All you are trying to do is dictredit German nationalists.
Okay, so they are Nazi's not NeoNazi's.
ElParedon
"Al Nakba" <william...@bluebottle.com> wrote in message
news:44414535-befa-4c8b...@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
104 Konzlagersm altogether, only two or three had any Jews in them.most were
for Russians, gypsies, partizans and rebels in general including about 2
million Germans!
Roy Roger
the Christian people in Russia and Serbia, Kosovo, and Germany. We Jews only
lost few thousand and the people who killed them were Neocons Zio/Nazi
criminals.
Roy Roger
"Heinrich" <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote in message
news:5s7pf1F...@mid.individual.net...
B'enjamin C'ramer
<oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:165f4a48-bb7a-4db8...@r60g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
What fucking holocaust?
B'enjamin C'ramer
"Richard Warren" <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5mI7j.2857$1p.1688@trndny01...
The "normative" account, you half-wit.
Do you know nothing? [Rhetorical]
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>> --
>>> Wotan
>>
>
>
It's all a bit strange
news:QPJ7j.19413$N67....@bignews5.bellsouth.net:
> 104 Konzlagersm altogether, only two or three had any Jews
> in them.most were for Russians, gypsies, partizans and
> rebels in general including about 2 million Germans!
Auschwitz
Bergen Belsen
Treblinka
Ravensbruck
gee that looks like more than 2 or 3 and it's not even a start.
It must hurt to be as stupid as you are.
It's all a bit strange
news:YZadnXy4eYfu5sLa...@giganews.com:
No, it was a murdering holocaust. I can see your confusion, your
mistaking the phrase for your poofter movie celebration.
Kenneth McVay OBC
I would say that a nazi is someone who ascribes to the NAZI point of view, that being
that Jews are sub-human, along with Gypsies, Slavs, Negroes, Arabs and other non-Whites,
and that White Gentiles are "superior beings."
--
"Irving's conclusions were completely untenable. I thought his
scholarship was sloppy and unreliable and did not meet even the
most basic requirements of honest and competent historical
research." (Richard Evans, Lying About Hitler, p.70)
Kenneth McVay OBC
Richard Warren <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
That won't happen. Poor Stinky is compelled to run back to the sewer when that one comes
up.
He seems to believe that he can claim that such a thing exists and yet DENY such a thing
exists at the same time.
Can you spell C*O*W*A*R*D?
--
'I fully accept this, it's a fact. The discussion on Auschwitz, the gas
chambers and the Holocaust is finished ... it's useless to dispute it'.
(David Irving on Holocaust denial, as quoted by his Austrian lawyer)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org/
Kenneth McVay OBC
Roy Roger <rro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Piss off, kid. Come back when you learn to speak English. Then perhaps you can converse
with adults.
--
"Since all you knowledge is coming out of your holocaust
Fairydale book I will not your naivety holding against
you." (K. Knoll, Leading Revisionist Scholar)
Heinrich
"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> schreef in bericht
news:13lv389...@corp.supernews.com...
> In article <yaK7j.16717$k22.11907@trnddc02>,
> Roy Roger <rro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Piss off, kid. Come back when you learn to speak English. Then perhaps you
> can converse
> with adults.
fewd up with imbeciles like you. start reading the diary of Hirschfeld the
jew under whose reign more than 100.000 jews were shipped east in no time.
BTov
> "Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> schreef in berichtnews:13lv389...@corp.supernews.com...> In article <yaK7j.16717$k22.11907@trnddc02>,
> > Roy Roger <rro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Piss off, kid. Come back when you learn to speak English. Then perhaps you
> > can converse
> > with adults.
>
> why donot you simply fuck off you canadian arrogant asshole i am getting
> fewd up with imbeciles like you. start reading the diary of Hirschfeld the
> jew under whose reign more than 100.000 jews were shipped east in no time.
is number one shabos goy!
comemorate at yad vashem!!
or may be vad yashem!!!
b'wahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!
btov
haifa, israel
Heinrich
"BTov" <dkas...@hotmail.com> schreef in bericht
news:7166d85b-5ff3-4e31...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
reference:
a)Hirschfeld
b)Weinreb (famous his so called lists ala Schiondler)
c)Ascher & Cohen ( Judenrat chairmans)
d)Kurt Schelsinger, chief jew at transfer camp Westerbork
all of these guys survived at the expense of other and dies in their own bed
with a smile on their face)
perfumeTheMovie
> "perfumeTheMovie" <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote in message
I'm getting up in the woild. Foist I'm called a denier, then a
racist, then a nazi, then bubba, and now Nazoid! I've finally
arrived!
I've previously defined the official version of the holocaust my good
man.
>
>
>
> >> --
> >> Wotan
perfumeTheMovie
> In article <b3aeaf8e-8002-4a82-a088-b791ddbec...@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> perfumeTheMovie <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote:
> >On Dec 11, 5:10 pm, oneeyewo...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>
> >> > The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt, has questioned the
> >> > number of Holocaust deaths
>
> >> What a surprise... LOL
>
> >> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>
> >Define the term 'nazi' if you are able.
>
> I would say that a nazi is someone who ascribes to the NAZI point of view, that being
> that Jews are sub-human, along with Gypsies, Slavs, Negroes, Arabs and other non-Whites,
> and that White Gentiles are "superior beings."
Interesting. Read...
Warning. The link to the site(posted below)contains material that may
be offensive to some. Those that are offended by a 'white pride' site
should understand that I post this link for the reason of clarifying
just what national socialism(nazism) is. I am not in agreement with
that political philosophy, nor do I wish to steer anyone in that
direction. This NG(alt.revisionism) exists for the purpose of
political discussion, therefore conflicting views are necessary to the
process of stimulating debate. Sites that do 'push' white pride are
offensive to most including myself as I have trouble with the concept
of being proud of my skin colour. Or my sexual orientation. Or
whatever else I was born with. Pride comes from doing and doing it to
the best of one's ability; as long as whatever you're doing is
positive.
Also this site does attempt to define NatSoc. How much is truth(all
political philosophies do attempt to make 'theirs' look as clean as
possible, however the enemies of these political philosophies attempt
to make them look as dirty as possible; witness McVay's one sided view
of NatSoc)is up for debate although the e-pamphlet is mostly opinion
and therefore almost impossible to argue against.
http://www.aryan-nations.org/reichsfolk/meaning.html
This pamphlet is a basic introduction to National-Socialism, written
by a National-Socialist. It is not concerned with history - it deals
solely with National-Socialist philosophy: what National-Socialism
itself actually is, and what National-Socialists believe in or uphold.
As this work will show, National-Socialism is totally opposed to the
values, and the ideas, which have come to dominate the modern
"Western" world. The basic values of National-Socialism are the now
almost forgotten values of honour, a striving for excellence, self-
discipline and the triumph of individual will. The heroic warrior
spirit of National-Socialism is totally opposed to the self-indulgent
materialism which has come to dominate every modern social-worker
infested "Western" society.
National-Socialism has become a real modern heresy, feared and
reviled. For over seventy years, the opponents of National-Socialism
have been spreading their lies and propaganda about National-
Socialism; for the past fifty years, the governments of every so-
called "Western" country have indoctrinated their peoples with these
lies and this propaganda. In many of these countries, National-
Socialism, and National-Socialist literature, is illegal, with public
displays of National-Socialist symbols, such as the swastika,
forbidden; in nearly every other country National-Socialists are
actively persecuted and imprisoned. In all these countries, the only
information available to the public about National-Socialism has come
from its enemies. This pamphlet aims to change this, presenting as it
does the suppressed truth about National-Socialism.
My The Religion of National-Socialism (Third Edition, 114yf) is a
companion volume to this present work.
David Myatt
Oxford 108 yf
(Third Edition, 115yf)
I
What Is National-Socialism?
National-Socialism believes there are two fundamental ways of living,
and thus two fundamental types of society based upon these two ways.
There is the material way of living, with individuals striving for, or
pursuing, "happiness", material comfort and wealth. Then there is the
way of excellence, of idealism (or nobility) with individuals striving
for an idealistic goal. National-Socialism believes the material way
is decadent - a waste of our lives, a waste of the evolutionary
potential which we possess.
Furthermore, National-Socialism believes that the life of an
individual is better, more fulfilling, if the idealistic goal that is
pursued is in accord with the will of Nature. That is, if this
idealistic goal aids Nature, and continues the evolutionary work of
Nature. This stems from the National-Socialist assertion that we, as
human beings, are part of Nature, and subject to the laws of Nature.
All other philosophies, political beliefs or religions assert that we,
as human beings, are somehow "above", different or separate from,
Nature and her laws.
One of the fundamental aims of National-Socialism is to continue the
work of Nature by creating better, more advanced, individuals and by
creating a better, more advanced, more civilized society for these
individuals to live and flourish in. National-Socialism believes that
better individuals can only be created through the pursuit of noble
values - by individuals changing themselves for the better through a
personal act of will. This requires individuals, and society itself,
to champion and uphold those values which create personal excellence,
which aid the individual change necessary. According to National-
Socialism, these values are honour, loyalty and duty - for only these
values create the right type of idealistic person, someone with a
purity of purpose. It is these values, and these values alone, which
create a civilized individual. A civilized person is a more evolved
individual - someone with a higher, a noble, personal character.
Further, it is the duty of each noble individual to act in accord with
the workings, the will, of Nature herself.
According to National-Socialism, the folk - or "race" - is how Nature
works. For National-Socialism, the folk is Nature made manifest; the
folk is our connection to Nature. The different folks which exist
among our human species are an expression of evolution in action - of
Nature working over Aeons to produce diversity and difference. Thus,
the folk is an expression of our very humanity - of our human identity
(1).
Accordingly, National-Socialism desires to preserve and further
evolve, in an honourable way, the folk itself. All other philosophies,
political beliefs or religions desire to destroy the folk through
creating multi-racial, multi-cultural societies.
However, it needs to be stressed that National-Socialism - being based
upon honour - demands that all National-Socialists treat all people,
of whatever race and culture, with respect. To do otherwise, is
contrary to the ethics of National-Socialism, based as these ethics
are upon honour.
For National-Socialism, the fundamental meaning of our lives, as
individuals, is to strive to continue the work of Nature. This means
striving to advance ourselves through upholding, in our own lives, the
civilized values of honour, loyalty and duty; it means us doing our
noble and civilized duty by striving to preserve and further evolve
our own folk or race, and those things which make our own people
unique. These unique things are the ethos, the soul, the character,
the culture, of our folk. According to National-Socialism, the ethos,
the character of our human species is expressed by honour, curiosity,
exploration - these things express the true nature of we human beings.
Furthermore, National-Socialism believes that it is the ultimate
Destiny of our human species to settle among the stars of our galaxy -
to create a Galactic Empire or Federation.
In contrast to the inspiring, the noble, the Galactic - the numinous -
goals of National-Socialism, the goals of all other philosophies,
political beliefs or religions are mundane, materialistic and a
complete waste of our lives.
II
Honour, Loyalty and Duty:
A Personal Revolution
The fundamental personal values of National-Socialism - the foundation
of National-Socialist morality - are honour, loyalty, and duty. A
National-Socialist is someone who upholds, or who strives to uphold,
these personal values: someone whose personal life is governed by
these values. Thus, a true or genuine National-Socialist is someone
who strives to be honourable, who is loyal to those they have sworn to
be loyal to, and who does their National-Socialist duty.
The purpose of these values is to civilize, for it is these values
which make a person civilized and noble. That is, these values express
the essence of nobility and civilization; they create, or can create,
a person who possesses a civilized, a noble, a strong character. In
effect, these values create or can create a better individual; they
are means whereby a personal, inner, revolution can be achieved
through a triumph of individual will.
Honour:
Honour is basically the natural instinct for nobility made conscious
and this is done through a Code of Honour (2). Some things are fair,
and some other things are unfair. A person of noble character -
someone with an inborn sense of fairness - knows or feels what is fair
and what is unfair. Honour thus determines personal behaviour, and the
high standards of personal behaviour which honour demands are set out
by a Code of Honour. Most fundamental of all, an honourable person is
prepared to die - if necessary by their own hand - rather than be
dishonoured. If someone is not prepared to do this, or does not do
this for the sake of their own honour, then they are not living in an
honourable way. Honour is thus a hard, and simple, standard to live
by, and those who are honourable thus possess a strong personal
character and a purity of purpose. They are better, more noble, more
civilized, more evolved individuals because of this.
Loyalty:
Loyalty, like honour, is simple to understand, and simple in practice.
Loyalty is being true to a person you have sworn to be loyal to. True
loyalty means taking an oath of loyalty, an oath of allegiance, to a
particular person and never breaking that oath. An oath of loyalty can
only be ended in two ways: (i) by the death of the person to whom you
have sworn to be loyal, and (ii) by mutual agreement between you and
the person given loyalty.
Thus, true loyalty, like honour, sets a high personal standard, and
requires personal discipline. Fundamentally, loyalty means Comradeship
- true loyalty means being a Comrade to those you have sworn to be
loyal to, and never letting those Comrades down. True loyalty means
aiding and assisting those Comrades even when it is personally
difficult to do so - or even if it might mean one's own death. True
loyalty often means placing one own self - one's own opinions for
instance - second, after the person to whom you have pledged your
loyalty.
Duty:
Duty is the obligation an individual has to do what is necessary and
honourable. Thus, there is a duty to be loyal to those given loyalty.
There is a duty to strive to live in an honourable way. For a National-
Socialist, there is also the duty to promote National-Socialism, the
duty to strive to act in accord with Nature's will by preserving,
defending and evolving one's own folk, and the duty to strive for
personal excellence.
Neglect of one's duty is a dishonourable act, and the sign of a weak
personal character.
III
Triumph of the Will and Justice:
A Social Revolution
In respect of our basic human nature, or character, National-Socialism
is positive and idealistic, believing that most individuals possess
the potential to change themselves for the better. All that is
required for such a positive, civilized and evolutionary change, is
self-discipline and a natural idealism - the triumph of individual
will caused by an individual striving, or struggling, for an
idealistic goal which itself is in harmony with Nature. National-
Socialism believes that, given good leadership - sufficient noble
inspiration by honourable individuals - the majority of people can
change themselves for the better and come to know and value honour,
loyalty and duty. Those who now do not understand or value these noble
things, can do so given good leadership and guidance.
National-Socialism goes further, believing that it is possible to
create, to build, a positive, healthy, evolutionary society which
provides the social conditions necessary for individuals to develope
their natural character and their potential to the full. This society
can only be created through a National-Socialist revolution - by the
overthrow of the existing System which is based on materialism,
indulgence, selfishness, and neglect of one's folk, and which is thus
detrimental to the development of strong, honourable individuals, and
detrimental to the will of Nature, manifest in race and racial
diversity. The decadent values of this old System would be replaced by
National-Socialist values. These National-Socialist values are
personal honour, personal loyalty and duty to the folk.
A National-Socialist society, or Reich, is a society where the values
of honour, loyalty and duty are upheld, and where they form the basic
"code of practice" for those involved in public, or civic, life and
are the basic rules which govern all the Institutions (military,
Police, commercial, public, private, industrial and so on ) of the
society.
In this new Reich, the old system of so-called "justice" - based upon
abstract ideas and abstract dogma - would be replaced by National-
Socialist, or honourable, justice. National-Socialism believes that
real justice only and ever exists in honourable individuals - and
cannot exist in anything lifeless or abstract, such as some "law",
some "Court of Law", or some Institution, such as a Police force. It
is individuals, and individual character, which matter, not something
abstract and lifeless. A person is either honourable, and thus fair
and just - or they are not.
Because of this understanding of the importance of individual
character, such a Reich is a genuine folk-democracy where a real
freedom exists. This freedom exists in such a National-Socialist
society basically because of honour and duty: individuals know or
accept their honourable duty, to themselves and others, and strive to
do that duty to the best of their ability. For real freedom is not
about "personal choice, personal rights" in isolation, as it is not
about personal indulgence - it is about personal character. Real
freedom means having the character to know what is dutiful and right,
and having the character to do or try to do what is dutiful and right.
What must be understood is that personal honour, like folk itself, is
a manifestation of the will of Nature - a means whereby we have
evolved to become better, civilized beings. All modern societies
undermine individual character, and thus real freedom, because they
expect or demand that individuals conform or be subservient to
something abstract or dogmatic which in unnatural because it is
against the will of Nature as manifest in personal honour and the
folk. These modern societies do not try to elevate the individual, in
a natural way through developing personal character and through
developing an understanding of our duties to Nature, evident in the
folk. Instead, they effectively tyrannize or dictate to individuals by
legislation, and social schemes which are enforceable by yet other
laws, with more and more Prisons established to punish those who
transgress the unending stream of new social and political
legislation.
A really free society does not need "laws" which are enforced by a
Police force, as it does not need hundreds of thousands of "social
workers" or tens of thousands of professional lawyers - it only needs
individuals who know what is honourable and who always strive to do
the honourable thing. Modern societies are based on the mistaken and
unnatural premise that it is legislation, social schemes enforced by
laws, and the "deterrence" of Prison, which can make a better society.
National-Socialism totally rejects this unnatural way, and instead
upholds the natural way of honour and the triumph of individual will.
National-Socialism is also realistic, as well as idealistic. Thus, it
accepts that there will always be a few individuals who are and always
will remain dishonourable, cowardly and ignoble by nature, despite
repeated attempts by noble and idealistic leaders to inspire and
change these few. But it is always only a few who cannot change
themselves for the better through a triumph of the will, and always
only a few who thus are disruptive of a society based upon noble
ideals. A National-Socialist Reich would give these few several
chances to change themselves and thus become honourable dutiful
individuals, through, for example, service to the folk in the Armed
Forces. Should they still not change themselves, then they would be
removed - via exiling them - for the removal of such a detrimental few
is necessary to ensure the well-being of the whole.
IV
National-Socialism: The Honourable Way Of Life
At present, the most important tasks of National-Socialism are to free
people from the mental slavery they now endure in the dishonourable
societies of the world, create free and honourable societies and then
seek to fulfill the Destiny, the mission, of the human species. The
beginning of this Destiny is to create new, folkish, or ethnic,
homelands on this Earth, and then create new colonies among the stars
of our Galaxy. The following five points briefly summarize the most
important aspects of National-Socialism.
(1) National-Socialism is an expression, a manifestation, of the
Destiny of the human species. National-Socialism expresses the natural
desire of healthy, noble, individuals to live among their own kind, to
preserve and extend their unique folk and their unique culture, and to
prosper and evolve still further in accord with the laws of Nature and
in accord with the unique Destiny of the human species. According to
National-Socialism, this Destiny is to civilize: to explore, to know,
to quest after new adventures and new frontiers.
Fundamentally, National-Socialism expresses what it means to be
honourable, and is a guide to an honourable way of life.
(2) National-Socialism is an expression of the desire of healthy,
noble people to be free and to live in a socially just society.
National-Socialism expresses the desire of healthy, noble people to be
able to live in a noble society where honourable values and noble
customs are upheld.
National-Socialism regards all present societies as dis-honourable,
tyrannical and ignoble. All these societies are dedicated to the
suppression of noble values, and to the destruction of folk values,
customs and ethos. These societies, by their very nature and their
unnatural social laws are harmful to us, and Nature. Accordingly,
National-Socialism seeks the revolutionary overthrow, by honourable
means, of these decadent and ignoble societies.
(3) National-Socialism expresses, affirms and champions honour over
and above other values. In essence, honour is what express the soul,
the character, the true nature, of we human beings, and thus represent
what it means to be human and civilized.
Honour implies loyalty and duty and these three things express and
represent the noble warrior spirit. This noble warrior spirit, or
ethos, is totally opposed to the usury of capitalism, and in place of
present societies built upon or dependant upon the usury of debt and
interest, and thus dependant upon money and "International Finance",
National-Socialism seeks to create an entirely new society founded
upon honest work and concern for the welfare of the folk where the
slavery of debt and interest would be abolished.
(4) National-Socialism expresses and affirms that "race" - the folk -
is of fundamental importance. To affirm the folk, in an honourable
way, is to affirm life itself, and the evolution of life toward a
higher existence. To affirm the folk in an honourable way is to affirm
and champion Nature, for the different folks are one of the ways in
which Nature works, and how Nature is manifest to us, and in us, as
individuals.
Thus National-Socialism champions ethnic difference and diversity, and
the creation a separate ethnic homelands where a particular folk can
live in freedom according to their own laws and customs.
(5) National-Socialism expresses and affirms the importance of
individual character. The most fundamental principle of National-
Socialism is that individuals can change themselves for the better
through an act - through the triumph - of individual will and through
being inspired by idealism. This is idealism: the pursuit of
individual excellence - the triumph of noble values through pursuit of
a noble, supra-personal aim.
The leadership principle which National-Socialism upholds is a
practical manifestation of the excellence of individual character - of
individuals of noble character leading and inspiring others
Accordingly, some of the fundamental, immediate and practical aims of
National-Socialism are: (a) preserving the diversity of folk and
culture of this world, through the creation of an folkish homelands;
(b) encouraging through educational and military Institutions noble,
honourable character in individuals, and ensuring the physical health
and well-being of the folk, and particularly the young through
rigorous physical and warrior training; (c) establishing a sound and
prospering rural way of life and rural economy as a means of producing
healthy food and encouraging healthy outdoor living.
V
Folkand Fatherland:
The Inner Meaning of National-Socialism
National-Socialism provides an answer to the most fundamental, and the
most important, question which we as individuals can ask: What is the
meaning of life? According to National-Socialism, the meaning of our
life, as individuals, is to evolve: to continue with, to further, the
evolutionary work of Nature by striving for personal excellence and
excellence, for our own folk or race, and for our human species in
general through a rational, honourable, co-operation based upon
folkish homelands. This is because we, as individuals, are not
isolated beings - we are part of Nature, and part of our race. We, as
individuals, are part of much larger living systems or beings. We
depend on these large organic beings because we ourselves are organic
beings and thus a part of the natural, the cosmic, order itself.
Furthermore, these large organic systems, these beings, also depend on
us. That is, what we do, or do not do, affects them. We can keep them
healthy and prosperous, and aid them to evolve still further. What we
have forgotten - or been indoctrinated not to be believe - is that our
folk, our folkish culture, is our connection to Nature, and that a
healthy society is by definition a folk society: an organic society
based upon folk and honour. That is, a healthy, natural, society - one
which expresses Nature, which aids Nature, which is in harmony with
Nature - is an ethnic society which upholds "Blood and Honour". All
other types of society, presently existing, or existing as a social,
political or religious idea, are unnatural and harmful to Nature and
the separate folk evolution which expresses the diverse health of
living Nature.
We, as individuals, are our folk, our very ancestors, made manifest
and re-born. Our folk is a supra-personal organism, a living being,
which has existed, which has lived, for thousands of years before us.
This living being which is our folk can also exist for thousands, for
hundreds of thousands, of years after us. The very health, the well-
being, the prosperity, the future of this living folkish being depends
on us - we are its future, just as it is natural for us, our duty, to
preserve, aid, defend and further evolve this living being. Thus, our
purpose, our duty, is to preserve the racial purity of our blood in an
honourable, reasoned way, and to further evolve our own folk. This
duty is our very purpose, as individuals - it is what we are born to
do, what we exist for. When we do not do this duty, we are wasting our
lives, we are undermining and helping to destroy this living folkish
being, and the greater living being which is Nature herself.
This is the simple, and profound, truth which National-Socialism
champions and which the enemies of National-Socialism have suppressed
and are trying so hard to destroy. Just as we are our folk, so are we
are unique ethnic, or folk, culture and our unique human Destiny: for
folk culture and our human Destiny are the soul, the essence, the very
life, the consciousness, of this supra-personal living being which is
our folk. Thus, it is also our duty, part of our purpose, to preserve,
aid and further develope our unique folkish culture, and to strive to
make our Destiny real through striving for excellence and further
evolution. A fatherland - or motherland - is the homeland, the
dwelling, of a specific people with a specific culture, the place
where that people dwells or where they settle, and it is a means to
preserve, aid and develope the folk: it is a folk society founded upon
and upholding a specific folk culture and striving to fulfill the
specific ethos of that folk. This unique homeland - when it is founded
upon National-Socialist principles - thus becomes a living being: a
living part of Nature. That is, the creation of such a homeland is a
bringing-into-being of a new type of life, a new manifestation of
Nature, and the Cosmic Being which is beyond Nature, of which Nature
is one manifestation on this planet we call Earth. Hence the
importance of such homelands, for our evolution, for Nature, and for
the Cosmos itself.
VI
The Way of Life of National-Socialism:
Philosophy of the Future
Correctly understood, National-Socialism is much more than a
"political" or even a social philosophy: it is a complete, and
revolutionary, Weltanschauung, or "philosophy of life". It is
profoundly spiritual and profoundly noble - a complete explanation of
our human nature, our human Destiny, and our place in the general
"scheme of things". In this sense, it is religious because it provides
us with the answers which we seek and because it reflects, or
represents, the natural order which exists in this world and the
cosmos itself. Fundamentally, National-Socialism, as a way of living
and as a religious, social and political philosophy, is an expression
of the will of Nature. It is also, equally importantly, an expression
of the nature and Destiny of our human species itself. As such, it is
a complete Way of Life.
What Is The National-Socialist Way of Life?
The National-Socialist Way of Life is the natural way of life of the
human species: that which aids our development, which makes us healthy
and which can continue our evolution, as human beings. Such a Way of
Life is healthy and inspiring, and represents, or expresses, the
natural ethos, or soul, of we human beings - that which distinguishes
us a noble, civilized, beings, which thus expresses our natural
Destiny, and represents our innate or natural character. .
Our natural, innate, evolutionary character as human beings can be
expressed by three words: curiosity, honour, conquest. By nature we,
when we are true to ourselves, are curious - we seek to know, to
understand, and we have developed the art, or skill, of reason to aid
us in this quest, this striving, for understanding. By nature, we when
we are true to ourselves, are honourable - we have an innate sense of
fairness, of natural justice, and an innate sense of what is right.
What is right, for us as human beings, is and always has been, what is
honourable. By nature, we, when we are true to ourselves, are striving
- we have an innate desire to overcome obstacles, difficulties through
the power, strength, or the triumph of our will. This desire to strive
is manifest, and has been manifest, in our natural warrior character.
When we express our natural nature, by our own lives and by our
religious, or moral, beliefs, we are more healthy, more natural, than
we would be otherwise. This is so because a natural Way of Life, or
religion, reflects, and gives expression to, our nature and thus our
conscience - our innermost beliefs and motives. It enables us to be
"in harmony with our nature" and thus creates and maintains a healthy
psyche in us as individuals.
In effect, a natural religion enables individuals to live in a human,
civilized, way, and in practice this means our lives have a purpose:
that they are fulfilling. When we live in accord with the principles
and ideals of our own natural religion, we are fulfilling our own
Destiny, as individuals, and thus aiding the unique Destiny of our own
folk and the human species in general.
Furthermore, The National-Socialist Way of Life gives us a practical,
reasonable and realistic answer to the most fundamental question of
all, the question of our own existence - "What is the purpose of our
lives as individuals, here on this planet we call Earth?"
For instance, for those of us who are of North European descent, the
old pagan religions of our ancestors expressed some - but not all - of
our nature. Examples of these old religions are the ancient Greek
religion of the Homeric gods and the religion of the Vikings. Without
exception, these old religions were the religion of warriors, and
reflected the nature and beliefs of ancient warrior societies, and
thus that part of our Aryan nature which is warrior-like. Hence, the
morality of these instinctive and natural Aryan religions was always
based upon personal honour. These religions also expressed, to a
greater or a lesser degree, our essential pagan nature - for instance,
our intuitive awareness of the numinosity, or sacredness, of Nature;
our intuitive understanding of the joys of living; our innate desire
to excel, to strive for excellence and for conquest; and our innate
appreciation of beauty and harmony. These old religions also saught to
give an answer to the fundamental question of our existence, as they
all saught to try and explain the cosmos, how it had arisen, how it
worked and how it affected our lives, as individuals. Such
explanations usually involved supra-human beings called "gods" and
"goddesses" who often were personifications of natural or cosmic
forces.
However, what all these old religions did not express was our unique
Destiny. They also did not fully express our unique human nature. The
new Way of Life of National-Socialism alone expresses and represents
our true nature, as it alone expresses and represents our unique
Destiny. Furthermore, National-Socialism presents us with a reasoned
answer to the fundamental question of our existence, just as it
explains in a reasoned way life, and the cosmos itself.
The meaning, or the purpose, of the old religions - like the
civilizations our ancestors created - is that they have led us to the
understanding of the present. They have prepared the way for the
divine revelation made manifest in the new religion of National-
Socialism.
The National-Socialist Way
The fundamental tenets, or principles, of this way of life (or
religion) are:
1) That there exists a supra-human Being - called the Cosmic Being -
and that this Cosmic Being creates, or can create, Order from Chaos.
Order is the very life of this Being. Order itself is a new, a better,
more evolved, or more excellent, arrangement of things.
2) That organic life itself is an expression, or manifestation, of the
Order which this Cosmic Being creates, and is thus an expression of
the life, the spirit, of this Being.
3) That change is a natural part of the evolution of Order from Chaos
and that this, for organic life, involves the organic process of birth-
life-death-renewal.
4) That death is not the final end of life, but the beginning of
further change, a renewal of the cosmic order itself.
5) That what we call Nature is the Cosmic Being - the Order created by
this Being - made manifest on this planet we call Earth. The creative
force, or energy, which is present in Nature, and which produces, and
causes changes in, living things - including ourselves - is this
Cosmic Being, living and evolving, that is, creating more Order.
6) That we, as individuals, are this Cosmic Being - the very cosmos
itself - made manifest. We sentient (that is, conscious and aware)
beings are the striving of the Cosmic Being for more cosmic Order.
7) That our evolution, as human beings, is an increase in the cosmic
Order and expresses the purpose, the life, or the will of the Cosmic
Being. Thus the striving, or struggle, for order (or excellence) - for
evolution toward higher forms - here on this planet, is how the Cosmic
Being works on this planet of ours, and is thus natural and necessary,
for without it, there would be no order and no evolution toward higher
forms.
8) That the Cosmic Being exists, or functions, in us through honour
(or fairness), through curiosity (or reason) and through striving (or
the triumph of individual will).
Thus, an honourable individual is someone who is doing the will, or
accomplishing the work, of this Cosmic Being.
9) That culture, race and excellence of individual character express
the will of this Being - of this Being working through Nature to bring
about more Order, more diversity and more difference through
evolution.
Thus, culture is one way in which this Cosmic Being is manifest to us,
as human beings on this planet of ours. Culture thus expresses the
essence of our humanity - of what makes us human. To preserve, and to
further evolve, each culture - and to seek to allow these cultures to
change - is to act in accord with the will, the purpose, of the divine
creator, while to undermine or seek to destroy culture and cultural
difference and diversity, is to act against the will of the divine
creator. Each unique culture can and should evolve, according to its
own unique nature: each unique culture should have the freedom to
develop of itself.
A culture is a combination of : (1) the unique customs, outlook,
traditions and achievements of a particular community, group, people
or society, with this community, group, people or society sharing a
common racial heritage; and (2) having a certain civilized way of life
- the way of manners, reason, fairness, honour, and excellence.
Culture is essentially an expression of our humanity - of what makes
us human, and different from animals. A cultured person is thus a
person who is civilized, and who possesses a sense of identity - who
belongs to a particular culture and who lives the way of life of that
culture.
10) That the human species has a special character, and a Destiny.
This character is expressed in our honour, curiosity and striving, and
is made manifest by the civilization which humans create when they
live according to their divine nature.
The Destiny of the human species is to bring the light of diverse
civilizations into the world, and to spread this light - the honour
and the reason of civilization - out into the cosmos itself by
venturing forth to explore and settle the star-systems of the cosmos.
VII
Guide To The National-Socialist Way Of Life
Honour, loyalty and duty are the fundamental ideals of National-
Socialism. They represent nobility in action, and the striving to live
by these ideals creates, or can create, a noble character in the
individual. The Nine Fundamental Principles of National-Socialism,
given below, express the practical essence of National-Socialism, for
individuals, and are thus a guide to how a National-Socialist should
live their life.
1) In everything that you do or undertake, strive for excellence.
2) Do your duty by placing the welfare and well-being of your folk
before your own self-interest, and seek to preserve and extend your
folk by marrying among your own kind, and by producing/nurturing
healthy children.
3) Uphold the noble ideal of honour in your own personal life, and
strive to live, and die, in an honourable way.
4) Strive to uphold the noble, human, ideals of fairness and courtesy
by being fair and courteous toward others, and strive to treat animals
in a humane way.
5) Be loyal to those you have sworn loyalty to, if necessary unto
death. Your word, once given, should not be broken since to break your
word is a dishonourable act.
6) Be intolerant of what is harmful and unhealthy to, and what
endangers, your folk, and what is detrimental to the other
manifestations of the Cosmic Being, provided always that you do only
that which is honourable.
7) Reverence Nature and be respectful toward what reveals or expresses
the numinous, the Cosmic Being.
8) Always be ready, willing and physically fit enough to defend
yourself and your family - and thus your own personal honour - and
always carry a defensive weapon to enable your honour to be saved.
9) Seek always to make the world a better, a more noble, place by
striving to make others aware of the noble ideals of honour, loyalty
and duty.
VIII
What is Nature?
Nature is that innate creative force which operates in the physical
world, on this planet, and which causes, or is the genesis of, and
controls, living organisms in certain ways. These "certain ways" are
the laws of Nature. The 'evolution of species' is a term used to
describe a theory about one of the ways in which Nature works.
Nature can thus be conceived as a type of being. This does not mean
that Nature should be understood in anthropomorphic terms, but rather
that Nature is a living, changing, entity: some-thing which is alive.
We ourselves, as human beings, are simply one manifestation, one
presencing, of Nature among many: that is, we are subject to the laws
of Nature, the laws which govern organic change and organic life
itself. Like all life on this planet, we are born, we grow and change,
and we die.
Most cultures had, or have, a belief that Nature is living, and the
Mother of, the bringer-forth of, all life.
In olden times, Nature herself was often personified in terms of gods,
and goddesses. That is, we apprehended Nature in terms of ourselves -
in terms of individual beings with names, a history and a distinct
personality. However, this type of apprehension is no longer necessary
nor valid since we have developed, over the last few thousand years,
the faculty of pure reason and can understand Nature, ourselves and
the cosmos beyond Nature, in a natural manner without such
intermediate forms. That is, we can now apprehend Nature as Nature is.
Hitherto, we projected human-type forms onto Nature in an effort to
comprehend Nature as we did not possess much of an understanding of
the cosmos beyond Nature and how Nature is but part of this cosmos.
Thus, most people who belong to the Aryan folk no longer believe there
is a mighty god named Thor, nor a goddess called Diana, who live, as
distinct individual entities, in a different realm and who have a
personality and a personal history. Instead, we view Nature as a whole
- as an entity which is and which becomes manifest, incarnate, in all
living things, all of which have their own nature, their own destiny
or fate. In the descriptive sense, our apprehension no longer relies
on names. Instead, it is built upon pure reason itself; it is organic
and beyond us, as humans with our finite individuality and our finite
personalities.
This does not lessen the awe, the wonder, the respect for Nature -
rather, it increases it because we are aware of the wider perspective,
of how we are but part of a living, changing, evolving organic whole
whose well-being, whose future, depends on us - on what we do, or do
not do. For we are aware now of not only our personal duties, but also
our supra-personal responsibilities toward Nature. If we harm Nature
we are in effect only harming ourselves - undermining and possibly
destroying our very future and the future of our descendants.
Nature and National-Socialism
Many religions and many philosophies do not accept that Nature is
alive, or that there is a creative force inherent in Nature. Instead,
many religions posit God as the Creator.
National-Socialism, however, accepts as a fundamental principle that
this creative force, in Nature, exists and that Nature is a living,
changing, being. It further accepts that the evolution of species is
one of the most significant ways in which Nature works. This evolution
is and has been, toward diversity and difference. Insofar as we
ourselves are concerned, Nature has made us a unique species. Within
this species, there are various races, which are distinct from each
other. Even these races have evolved in different ways and at
different times so that there are many distinct sub-races. Thus,
Nature has produced, over thousands of millennia, distinct and
different races, and within those races produced individuals, of
differing character. Fundamentally, National-Socialism is an
acceptance and celebration of the difference and diversity that Nature
has produced, and it wants to nurture, in an honourable, ethical way,
that diversity and difference and so keep alive, and keep evolving,
those things which make us unique and 'human'.
We affect Nature because we are Nature made manifest - we are an
expression of Nature's change, Nature's evolution. That is, we are a
living nexus. We who follow the way of National-Socialism revere
Nature because we know, understand or feel how Nature exists in us.
Nature exists in us through our folk, our ancestors, and through the
fatherland, the homeland, where our folk dwells or where it settles.
What lives in us, as Nature, is our culture, our folk, our fatherland;
in a special way we are the land of our fatherland, as we are our folk
- we are part of the organic, living whole which includes our folk,
our land, the soil of the land, the trees growing in the soil, the
creatures, the animals, the life, which exits in or upon this land. We
even are the climate of our land - the sun, the rain, the clouds, the
wind, the changing seasons.
Because of this, we do not fundamentally exist as separate
individuals. Our very existence, as individuals, is bound-up with our
folk and our homeland - with our own Blood and Soil. Our folk, our
homeland - Nature herself - depends upon us to keep these things
going, to keep them healthy, to nurture them and help them grow
further. Thus are we born from our folk and our homeland, and thus do
we when we die return to them.
Appendix I
The National-Socialist Honour Code
The word of a man of honour is his bond - when a man of honour gives
his word ("On my word of honour...") he means it, since to break one's
word is a dishonourable act. An oath of loyalty or allegiance to
someone, once sworn by a man of honour ("I swear by my honour that I
shall...") can only be ended either: (i) by the man of honour formally
asking the person to whom the oath was sworn to release him from that
oath, and that person agreeing so to release him; or (ii) by the death
of the person to whom the oath was sworn. Anything else is
dishonourable.
A man of honour is prepared to do his honourable duty by challenging
to a duel anyone who impugns his honour or who makes dishonourable
accusations against him. Anyone so challenged to a duel who, refusing
to publicly and unreservedly apologize, refuses also to accept such a
challenge to a duel for whatever reason, is acting dishonourably, and
it is right to call such a person a coward and to dismiss as
untruthful any accusations such a coward has made. Honour is only
satisfied - for the person so accused - if he challenges his accuser
to a duel and fights it; the honour of the person who so makes such
accusations or who so impugns another man's honour, is only satisfied
if he either unreservedly apologizes or accepts such a challenge and
fights such a duel according to the etiquette of duelling. A man of
honour may also challenge to a duel and fight in such a duel, a person
who has acted dishonourably toward someone whom the man of honour has
sworn loyalty or allegiance to or whom he champions.
A man of honour always does the duty he has sworn to do, however
inconvenient it may be and however dangerous, because it is honourable
to do one's duty and dishonourable not to do one's duty. A man of
honour is prepared to die - if necessary by his own hand - rather than
suffer the indignity of having to do anything dishonourable. A man of
honour can only surrender to or admit to defeat by someone who is as
dignified and as honourable as he himself is - that is, he can only
entrust himself under such circumstances to another man of honour who
swears to treat his defeated enemy with dignity and honour. A man of
honour must die fighting, or die by his own hand, rather than subject
himself to the indignity of being defeated by someone who is not a man
of honour.
A man of honour treats others courteously, and women gallantly, and is
only disdainful and contemptuous of those who, by their attitude,
actions and behaviour, treat him with disrespect or try to harm him,
or who treat with disrespect or try to harm those he has personally
sworn loyalty to or whom he champions.
A man of honour, when called upon to act, or when honour bids him to
act, acts without hesitation and if necessarily quite ruthlessly
provided always that honour is satisfied.
A man of honour, in public, is somewhat reserved and controlled and
not given to displays of emotion, or to boasting, preferring as he
does deeds to words.
A man of honour does not lie, once having sworn on oath ("I swear on
my honour that I shall speak the truth...") as he does not steal from
others or cheat others for such conduct is dishonourable. A man of
honour may use guile or cunning to deceive his sworn enemies, and his
sworn enemies only, provided always that he does not personally
benefit from such guile or cunning and provided always that honour is
satisfied.
A man of honour strives to dress in a clean, discreet way in practical
clothes devoid of ostentation and suitable to the task in hand.
Appendix II
A National-Socialist Glossary
[ Note: What follows are brief explanations of some of the main terms
important for an understanding of National-Socialism. Words marked
with a * are defined in this Glossary.]
Archetype:
An archetype expresses an *ideal, or is a representation of what is
ideal. As such, an archetype represents what is beautiful and
harmonious - a striving for excellence - and is possessed of
*numinosity. What is archetypal is what is most representative of, or
most excellent about, a particular thing.
Aryan:
The term 'Aryan' is used to describe the White or Caucasoid race which
originated in Europe. The term itself derives from an ancient Aryan
word for 'a noble man' - Airya/Arya and is thus apt to describe this
warrior folk.
The Arts of Civilization:
These are Arts, or skills, the acquisition of which makes an
individual civilized. Someone who has mastered the Arts of
Civilization is thinking, acting and living like an Aryan, since these
Arts embody the essence of the Aryan ethos. The Arts are: the Art of
personal Honour; the Art of Combat or fighting; and the Art of
Knowledge, of seeking to learn about the vast cultural and scientific
heritage of civilizations.
Civilization:
Civilization is an ordered way of living - superior to primitive,
selfish, barbarism - created by inventive warrior tribes who uphold
the *noble personal values of *honour, loyalty and duty. It arises
primarily from co-operation: from individuals being willing to place
the welfare, security and future of their folk before their own self-
interest.
Fundamentally, civilization depends for its creation and its
maintenance on inventive, heroic, honourable individuals. Civilization
is the pursuit of, or struggle for, *excellence by a heroic, noble and
inventive folk or community who uphold honour and who thus create a
society where *freedom is the norm.
Culture:
Culture is the term used to describe those things which can aid an
individual to improve or advance themselves, and thus fulfill the
potential for change latent within them. Each folk produces its own
unique culture, and the distinctive culture of a particular folk
embodies or manifests the unique *ethos, or soul/spirit, of that folk.
A culture is a combination of (1) the unique customs, outlook,
traditions and achievements of a particular community, group, people
or society, with this community, group, people or society sharing a
common heritage; and (2) having a certain civilized way of life - the
way of manners, reason, fairness, honour, and excellence. Culture is
essentially an expression of our humanity - of what makes us human,
and different from animals. A cultured person is thus a person who is
civilized, and who possesses a sense of identity - who belongs to a
particular culture and who lives the way of life of that culture.
Decadence:
Decadence is a decline in or loss of *excellence. Decadence undermines
and destroys individual vitality and health, and is basically a
placing of self-interest, and self-indulgence, before personal honour
and before the duty an individual has - as a thinking, civilized,
being - toward striving to continue evolution by pursuing noble
ideals.
Decadence, on the individual level, is a lack of character - a lack of
will. On the artistic level, decadence is a lack of self-control, a
pandering to weakness, a removal of high standards, and it is the
philosophy, and the aesthetics, of the pretentious, the weak and the
cowardly.
Democracy:
Real or genuine democracy means individual *honour and *freedom - it
is an expression of the desire or will of a living, or organic,
community to determine it own future. An organic society is totally
different from, and totally opposite to, the lifeless, abstract modern
societies created by abstract political or social dogma.
Fundamentally, an organic society is an ethnic State.
Contrary to a popular misconception, the Greek word 'demos' does not
simply mean 'people' in general. Rather, it originally meant 'the
clan' in contrast to their 'chiefs'; in later Attic Greek, the word
came to mean 'the community' or folk itself - distinguished as this
community was by ties of blood. In both cases, a distinct racial or
folk-community is meant.
A real democracy is a society, composed of members of the same race,
where the ultimate authority resides in the folk-communities of that
society. It is an ethnic nation, or community, where the individuals
of that community co-operate together for their own well-being and
advancement by upholding the ideals of honour and freedom.
Excellence:
Excellence is what is supreme; what is worthy; what is the best.
Excellence is the setting of high-standards and the pursuit of them.
It embodies what is archetypal or *ideal. Excellence implies a moving-
forward, an evolution or improvement to a higher level, this higher
level being set by an ideal or archetype, or some other expression of
harmonious perfection.
On the individual level, excellence implies self-discipline and a
noble motivation - a striving toward a supra-personal goal or ideal.
The Folk:
A folk is not exactly the same as "a race". A folk arises over time,
through living in a certain area - a homeland - through shared
experiences, through a common heritage, history and so on. Over time,
a specific culture arises, which represents that particular folk, and
the folk of this homeland develop a certain character: a certain
nature, which in general serves to distinguish them from the peoples
of others cultures. This character may be manifest in their way of
life, their religious outlook, their literature, their natural music
(that is, their "folk music").
Generally, the people of a particular folk community share a common
racial ancestry but the living being which is and becomes their folk -
their folk culture, their homeland - evolves, changes, and brings into
being a new type of life which is different from the life of the other
communities who initially may have shared the same racial heritage.
Thus, a folk is not an abstract, easily defined, static, "thing" like
the concept of race. It is a living, changing, evolving, being - a
unique type of life. What defines a folk is thus far more than a
certain set of physical or physiological or genetic characteristics. A
folk is a symbiotic being - in symbiosis with the being which is the
homeland of that folk, with that community or that collection of
folkish communities. All this makes the culture, the Way of Life, the
ethos (or soul) of that folk living as well. And it is this living
which is numinous, which presences the numinous.
Freedom:
Freedom is the basis of the civilized way of living and means an
individual having the basic right to determine their own life by
choosing allegiance and by being able and willing to physically defend
themselves, their own honour and that of their blood-kin. [ Note: The
English word 'free' originally meant "to love (and defend) one's
kin". ]
Thus freedom means the right to be able to bear and to use arms or
weapons in self-defence and in defence of one's own honour and that of
one's kin. It further means the right to be able to do this, in
accordance with a code of honour, with no one else and no group,
Institution or officials, being able to interfere, judge or restrict
and take away the liberty of any individual so defending themselves
and their honour, whatever the outcome. Thus, were a man to defend his
own honour in an honourable way - according to a code of honour - such
as, for example, by a duel, or a fair fight, then that man not only
has the right to fight such a duel, but also has the right to be at
liberty were his opponent to be injured or even killed in such a duel
or fight. Anything other than this is un-civilized and tyrannical - a
denial of freedom.
Real freedom means individuals of noble character having the ability
and the power to determine their own lives in accord with what is
noble and dutiful.
Honour:
Honour is the setting of high and *noble standards of personal
conduct. The high standards set by honour derive from idealism and
thus from the pursuit of excellence.
Honour is the instinct for nobility made conscious, and a code of
honour is a means whereby the high standards of honour are set and a
means whereby individuals strive to uphold and maintain them. Honour
is the basis for the human morality of National-Socialism. It is
honour which determines the limits of personal behaviour and our
relation to other beings: that is, how we should interact with other
beings. Honour also determines the form, the nature, of those things
we can use and construct and develop to aid ourselves and others -
such as communities. In such useful social constructs, honour sets
limits and is the basis for any and all norms, or laws, which may
govern such communities.
Honour is a manifestation, or presencing, in the causal, of the
numinosity we possess by virtue of being human.
Idea:
An idea is basically a created model for which no natural *archetype
exists. Abstract ideas express a concept of what is 'common' - that
is, what is not the best; what is not of excellence. An idea is the
exact opposite of an *ideal. Ideals represent and express personal, or
individual, character; an idea represents and abstraction which
individuals are expected to conform to or be subservient to.
Ideal:
An ideal is something which enshrines what is excellent, or which
represents what is the best. It is a practical embodiment of
excellence itself; some thing, or some person, distinguished because
that thing or that person is the best - for example, the most
courageous person in a battle who is distinguished from their comrades
by their brave actions.
On the individual level, idealism means individuals undertaking deeds
of exceptional merit which mark them out, and doing this because they
themselves strive for the excellence of an ideal or ideals.
An ideal stands directly opposed to an abstract idea. Ideals are human
- that is, organic; as such they are possessed of *numinosity; they
are *archetypal and thus inspiring for individuals. Ideas are
abstract, and lifeless - and thus essentially in-human. National-
Socialism is based upon human ideals; all modern societies are based
upon lifeless abstract ideas.
Justice:
Justice exists in, and only exists in, fair, noble individuals who
uphold a code of honour and who strive to live by that code of honour.
Justice does not exist in, and cannot exist in anything abstract, be
it in a law, a 'Court of Law', an Institution or whatever. Real
justice lives only in individuals and cannot be abstracted out from
them into a dead, life-less, abstract form.
A just society is a society which is noble and which allows
individuals to test or prove their own honour and innocence - and thus
stay free - by trial by combat or by having someone champion them in
such a trial.
Nobility:
Nobility refers to personal character - it means having a noble
character or nature. Someone who is noble is someone who is honourable
- who exhibits those traits of character which represent honour: that
is, fairness, heroism, courage, and gallantry.
Honour is the instinct for nobility made conscious, and a code of
honour is a means whereby the high standards of honour are set and a
means whereby individuals strive to uphold and maintain them.
Numinous:
Something is numinous if it has beauty and awe. Something which is
divinely-inspired or divinely-representative is numinous. What is
numinous is generally what is revered, or regarded as sacred - as
spiritual or divine. Nature herself is numinous - a wonderful, awe-
inspiring mystery.
The numinous is an expression of the acausal - of the Unity behind
causal, temporal, appearance.
Social Engineering:
Social Engineering is the term used to describe the manipulation and
control of people by abstract social/political *ideas. Our modern
lifeless, multi-racial societies are the direct product of decades of
social engineering, of social/political ideas and abstract doctrines
made law.
Way of Life:
A Way of Life enshrines a specific, unique, outlook, view of the world
or Weltanschauung and derives from an *ideal or combination of ideals.
In addition, a Way of Life is, or develops into, a culture. Thus, by
definition, a Way of Life is numinous, and possesses numinosity - an
ideology does not. By a unique outlook or view of the world is meant a
distinct cosmology and theology - that is, an explanation of the
meaning and purpose of our lives, as human beings, and an explanation
of our place in the Cosmos, and in Nature (this world where we dwell).
A further distinguishing feature of a Way of Life - in contrast to an
ideology - is that it expresses a unifying, holistic, or "organic",
view of all life, seeing the Unity hidden by appearance, and strives
to make this Unity manifest in a practical way through a particular
way of living. In practical terms, this means that a Way of Life does
not impose causal apprehension upon what is numinous, or acausal, and
this implies no separation, for instance, between what has been termed
"the State", and "religion" which words or terms are themselves
indicative of causal (that is, un-numinous) apprehension.
Appendix III:
National-Socialist Law
I: The first, and fundamental, principle of National-Socialist law is
that there are only honourable and dishonourable deeds, with
dishonourable deeds being the concern of National-Socialist laws. That
is, there is no concept of "crime" as "crime" is now understood in
modern societies. National-Socialist laws thus define what is dis-
honourable.
II: The second principle of National-Socialist law is that the
penalties for committing dishonourable deeds should be compensatory,
rather than punitive, and involve: (1) exile of those found guilty of
dishonourable conduct; (2) compensation by the guilty person, in
goods, or money, of the victim of the dishonourable deed, or of the
family/relatives of the victim. If the person found guilty of having
committed a dishonourable deed or deeds has little or no goods or
money then they can give their labour for a specified period.
Imprisonment is reserved for serious deeds of dishonour and should
never exceed a period of one year, with all those sentenced to
imprisonment being given the option of exile instead. As an
alternative to all the foregoing, a penalty of work serving the
community for a fixed period of not more than six months is
permissible.
Only these types of penalties are permitted by National-Socialist law,
for only these are honourable, fair and just. The death penalty is
expressly forbidden.
Exile can be of two kinds: Greater Exile, where the person is exiled
from the homeland for the rest of their life; or Lesser Exile, where
the person is exiled for a period of three years.
Someone who has been exiled is an outlaw: outside the protection of
National-Socialist law.
III: The third principle of National-Socialist law is that an
accusation of dishonourable conduct - that is, of someone doing a deed
which has been defined, in law, as dishonourable - must be made: (a)
in person by either the victim of such a deed, or by the family/
relatives of the victim; and (b) in public, in front of several
witnesses.
That is, National-Socialist law is concerned only with dishonourable
actions between individuals: with deeds which are actually done in
real life and which affect an individual or individuals. Thus, there
is not and can never be, in National-Socialist law, (a) any
prosecution of a person by some "Institution" or Government or
officials of these; (b) any prosecution for something which has not
been committed; (c) any such thing as a dishonourable deed committed
against some "Institution" or some "Government": that is, no such
thing as a "crime" against the State.
There is thus no such thing as "conspiracy" in National-Socialist law,
just as individuals cannot be prosecuted for "intending" to commit a
dishonourable deed.
What must be proved in an National-Socialist Court of Law is that the
accused did do the dishonourable deed they are accused of. An
intention to commit such a deed is not and never can be contrary to
National-Socialist law.
IV: The fourth principle of National-Socialist law is that every
individual has the right to defend themselves, their family, and those
to whom that individual has sworn, before witnesses, an Oath of
Loyalty, and the right to use lethal force in such defence.
Should an individual or individual be harmed or injured in such
defence, then it is the right, of that individual to seek redress from
the individual who has harmed or injured them. Should an individual be
killed in such defence, then the family/relatives of that individual
have the right of redress.
This redress consists either of accusing, in public, the person of
dishonourable conduct, or of a direct challenge to a duel or a trial
by combat.
V: The fifth principle of National-Socialist law is that disputes
between individual - involving injury or any other matter - may be
settled through either a duel between the individuals involved, or by
a trial by combat between those involved.
That is, it is a fundamental right, and duty, of the individual to be
responsible for themselves, their family, and those given an Oath of
Loyalty, and to seek, if necessary, personal vengeance and
satisfaction, through a duel or trial by combat. Justice, for National-
Socialist law, is a matter of honour and of being seen to be fair.
What matters, what is important, for National-Socialist law is the
personal honour of the individual and the right, and duty, of the
individual to defend their own honour. This right and duty cannot be
taken away from the individual by, for example, the State, for that
would be contrary to National-Socialist law, a denial of the freedom
of the individual based as this freedom is on personal honour, and
personal responsibility to defend that honour.
National-Socialist law thus accepts that a duel, or a trial by combat,
is an honourable way of settling disputes between individuals.
In the matter of duels and trial by combat, National-Socialist law
specifies that there must be an independent referee, Umpire or judge,
at least two independent witnesses, and that such duels and trials be
conducted in an honourable way according to custom. National-Socialist
law affirms that should any person be injured or killed in such a duel
or trial by combat then that is their own responsibility. That is,
National-Socialist law considers such duels and such combats - when
performed honourably according to custom - as honourable deeds.
VI: The sixth principle of National-Socialist law is that anyone
publicly accused of a dishonourable deed or deeds has a right to
either challenge the person making the accusation to a duel, or of
accepting a trial in an National-Socialist Court of Law.
Should the person so making the accusation agree to a duel, then the
matter is considered settled, according to National-Socialist law, by
the outcome of that duel provided it is done in an honourable way.
VII: The seventh principle of National-Socialist law is that an
individual accused of any dishonourable deed or deeds, who has
accepted a trial in an National-Socialist Court of Law, can either
elect to have their case heard, in public, with witnesses called, or
elect for a public trial by combat between the accused and a member or
relative of the family of the person who has made the accusation.
It is up to the Court to ensure that such a combat is fair: that is,
that the two combatants are fairly evenly matched in skill and
physical strength.
If the accused accepts a public Court, then they are bound by the
verdict of that Court. That is, there is no appeal. Thus, if the
accused is found guilty, then they must accept exile, or pay whatever
compensation is demanded by the Court. According to National-Socialist
law, failure to pay such compensation within the time specified by the
Court means the immediate exile of the person, with the type of exile
being decided by the Court.
VIII: The eighth principle of National-Socialist law is that a public
trial involves an accusation made by one individual against another
individual before a Jury of twelve honourable individuals, with their
being a presiding Judge. It is the duty of the Jury to judge the case
on the evidence of independent witnesses, and after hearing arguments
from the accused and the person who has brought the charge. The
accusation must be supported by the evidence of independent witnesses:
if there is no such evidence, the case is dismissed. It is the duty of
the Judge to pass sentence according to the principles of National-
Socialist law.
Thus, according to National-Socialist law, the people who should
prosecute a case, and who should defend an accusation, are either the
two individuals involved - accused and accuser - or members/relatives
of their families. That is, someone accused of some dishonourable deed
or deeds must either defend themselves in such a Court, or have a
member/relative of their family do this. The same applies for the
person bringing or making the accusation: they should if possible
present their own case, or have a member/relative of their family
present it.
It is also the duty of the person who believes a dishonourable deed
has been done to them - or the members/relatives of their family - to
find and accuse the person responsible, if such a person has not been
seen and identified during the deed, and to find any witnesses to the
deed.
National-Socialist law thus does not accept the absolute necessity of
"professional lawyers" or "solicitors", regarding such a necessity as
dishonourable and a negation of the liberty of the individual. All the
proceedings should be understandable by ordinary people, and involve
only the direct evidence of witnesses, whether or not a deed is
dishonourable according to National-Socialist law, and whether or not
such a deed has been done by the accused.
An independent witness is defined in National-Socialist law as a
person who is not a member or relative of either the person accused or
of the injured party, and who is not bound by an Oath of Allegiance to
either the accused or the injured party, or to any member of their
families.
Both the Judge and Jurors at such a trial must also be independent by
the same criteria, with both Judge and Jurors expected to have proved
and be known for their honour by their deeds, their work, their
service to the community.
IX: The ninth principle of National-Socialist law is that if a person
who has suffered a dishonourable deed according to National-Socialist
law has no living family members or relatives, then it is the duty of
an honourable person in the community to act on their behalf, and so
find and accuse the person they believe is responsible if that
honourable person sees such a deed committed, or sincerely and justly
believes that a dishonourable deed has been committed.
The person who so begins to act is bound by the rules of National-
Socialist law: that is, they must present the case themselves, and can
be challenged to a duel or a trial by combat by the person they
accuse.
This honourable duty of acting on behalf of a person who has no living
family members or relatives, or whose family members or relatives
cannot be traced, or who for some honourable reason such as infirmity
or sickness, cannot act on their behalf, may be undertaken by a public
official appointed to undertake such duties, with this official being
publicly known for their honour by their deeds, their work, their
service to and on behalf of the community.
Kenneth McVay OBC
Then a Google reference would be appropriate, since no one but you
seems to recall this defining moment.
--
Ken McVay http://www.nizkor.org
God grant me the Senility to forget the people I never liked anyway,
the good fortune to run into the ones I do, and the eyesight to
tell the difference.
Richard Warren
"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
news:13m02a0...@corp.supernews.com...
It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
Richard Warren
> In article <dlI7j.6108$va7.4303@trndny08>,
> Richard Warren <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>"perfumeTheMovie" <perfume...@live.ca> wrote in message
>>news:b3aeaf8e-8002-4a82...@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Dec 11, 5:10 pm, oneeyewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt, has questioned
>>>> > the
>>>> > number of Holocaust deaths
>>>>
>>>> What a surprise... LOL
>>>>
>>>> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Define the term 'nazi' if you are able.
>
>>How about you first define the "official version" of the Holocaust, Nazoid
>>hypocrite?
>
> That won't happen. Poor Stinky is compelled to run back to the sewer when
> that one comes
> up.
>
> He seems to believe that he can claim that such a thing exists and yet
> DENY such a thing
> exists at the same time.
>
> Can you spell C*O*W*A*R*D?
Yes. I can also spell H*Y*P*O*C*R*I*T*I*C*A*L D*E*N*I*E*R!!! The stench
of this little pile of pusillanimous puke is stifling.
ZULU
> <perfume...@live.ca> wrote:
>>I've previously defined the official version of the holocaust my good
>>man.
>
> Then a Google reference would be appropriate, since no one but you
> seems to recall this defining moment.
YOu already have it MaKoui, all people with "law against holoks' denying"
must know what it is.
For instance, in France:
The Gayssot Act (Loi Gayssot), voted for on July 13, 1990, makes it an offense
in France to question the existence of the category of crimes against humanity
as defined in the London Charter of 1945, on the basis of which Nazi leaders
were convicted by the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945-46
(art.9).
As consequence, the "French official version of the holokost" is written on the
marble ad vitam eaternam and it is guarded on the Nuremberg's Trial papers.
If you challenge that "official version" you go to jail with a big fee.
Katyn is optional.
Kenneth McVay OBC
Richard Warren <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
issue and then ran away from it.
You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
"OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
Holocaust is."
His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
that no "official version" existed.
That was roughly 24 hours after his initial foray into a.r., when
he wrote, "The illegality of forming an opinion contrary to the
'official' version is the true crime." In the same article that appeared in, he also made
the claim that Holocaust denial was not about hate, which pretty well let everyone know
where he stood.
Not long after that, he complained that he had been called a racist, and labeled his
earlier remarks as "a case for free speech," and said that it had been insinuated that he
was a denier, "even though I have not given any indication that I am..."
Of course, he *had* given an indication that he was a denier when he claimed, in his very
first article, that Holocaust denial wasn't about hate.
Duh.
Be that as it may, he now claims to have defined this "official version," although no one
seems to recall his having done so.
Gee... he hasn't told us who the Wiccans are that are running the White House, either.
Richard Warren
Bullshit you have.
>
>>
>>
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Wotan
>
Richard Warren
"It's all a bit strange" <strangeth...@turkeygoy.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9A03E1DD7B21A...@85.214.90.236...
There were more than 10,000 camps of various sizes.
RJ11
Heinrich <Hein...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
(snip)
In a memo written on September 8 1942, Kurt Prufer of the
firm "Topf and Sons" stated that Auschwitz officials are not
satisfied with a cremation capacity of 2,650 corpses per day,
and "we should deliver more ovens as quickly as possible".
http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/topf/
RJ.
perfumeTheMovie
> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>
>
> [...]
>
> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>
> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
> issue and then ran away from it.
>
> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>
> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
> Holocaust is."
>
> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
> that no "official version" existed.
>
> That was roughly 24 hours after his initial foray into a.r., when
> he wrote, "The illegality of forming an opinion contrary to the
> 'official' version is the true crime." In the same article that appeared in, he also made
> the claim that Holocaust denial was not about hate, which pretty well let everyone know
> where he stood.
>
> Not long after that, he complained that he had been called a racist, and labeled his
> earlier remarks as "a case for free speech," and said that it had been insinuated that he
> was a denier, "even though I have not given any indication that I am..."
>
> Of course, he *had* given an indication that he was a denier when he claimed, in his very
> first article, that Holocaust denial wasn't about hate.
>
> Duh.
>
else does that doesn't necessarily make that person hateful. You do
like to twist things don't you.
> Be that as it may, he now claims to have defined this "official version," although no one
> seems to recall his having done so.
>
> Gee... he hasn't told us who the Wiccans are that are running the White House, either.
>
Yes I have. They belong to a cabal; that doesn't make them Wiccans.
Here's the definition of cabal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal
The way you like to bog down arguments into name calling and untrue
accusation gives you away; McVay.
Kenneth McVay OBC
Holocaust denial is racist to the core - hatred of Jews is what spawns it. You can stomp
your widdle feet and deny it until the cows come home, but it won't change that truth.
Without hatred of Jews, there would be NO Holocaust denial.
>> Be that as it may, he now claims to have defined this "official version," although no one
>> seems to recall his having done so.
>>
>> Gee... he hasn't told us who the Wiccans are that are running the White House, either.
>>
>Yes I have. They belong to a cabal; that doesn't make them Wiccans.
You used the word COVEN, not cabal. Please try to focus.
Must be the Toronto air...
--
"Since all you knowledge is coming out of your holocaust
Fairydale book I will not your naivety holding against
you." (K. Knoll, Leading Revisionist Scholar)
perfumeTheMovie
>
> Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>
> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
> issue and then ran away from it.
>
> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>
> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
> Holocaust is."
>
> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
> that no "official version" existed.
>
Taken out of context Ken. You know that I was being sarcastic. If
you
can't get your head around that well then you can't get your head
around that.
perfumeTheMovie
> In article <f2d892a1-98fb-4949-bbf6-4fc6bc6da...@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Who hates here more than you McVay?
> >> Be that as it may, he now claims to have defined this "official version," although no one
> >> seems to recall his having done so.
>
> >> Gee... he hasn't told us who the Wiccans are that are running the White House, either.
>
> >Yes I have. They belong to a cabal; that doesn't make them Wiccans.
>
> You used the word COVEN, not cabal. Please try to focus.
>
http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1224.cfm
Evidence of at least two witches in Warshington. Does two make a
coven? Maybe ole' Kissinger is involved as well? Read the 7th book
of Moses backwards 7 times and you will reap the power of the debil.
Better yet, why don't you (you're good at this) pretend that this post
is serious and use it against me in the future. You excel at that
type of dishonesty.
> Must be the Toronto air...
>
Another Toronto hater. I can't stand the place myself. We have so
much in common Ken; we could be friends yet you continuously attack
me. I no longer love RW, but I do love you. You are like a dog to
me. Am I like a master to you?
Richard Warren
Must be. How deep are they piling it in Toronto these days?
Richard Warren
Your kind wrote the book on hatred. and the Nuremberg laws, too. Must be
a bitch to see your own words used to prove that you're a liar.
Richard Warren
> On Dec 12, 1:22 pm, kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>>
>> Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>>
>> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
>> issue and then ran away from it.
>>
>> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>>
>> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
>> Holocaust is."
>>
>> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
>> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
>> that no "official version" existed.
>
>>
>
> Taken out of context Ken. You know that I was being sarcastic. If
> you
> can't get your head around that well then you can't get your head
> around that.
What a load of shit! The man quotes you verbatim and all you can do is
whine about context. Pathetic.
It's all a bit strange
news:770e928f-efaa-44f6-bd9d-bef35a519cc3
@i29g2000prf.googlegroups.com:
> Who hates here more than you McVay?
>
cramwich, el paredon, ole irish, tommy, kurt
B'enjamin C'ramer
> On Dec 11, 10:13 pm, "Richard Warren" <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "perfumeTheMovie" <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b3aeaf8e-8002-4a82...@w40g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On Dec 11, 5:10 pm, oneeyewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>>
>> >> > The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt, has questioned
>> >> > the
>> >> > number of Holocaust deaths
>>
>> >> What a surprise... LOL
>>
>> >> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>>
>> > Define the term 'nazi' if you are able.
>>
>> How about you first define the "official version" of the Holocaust,
>> Nazoid
>> hypocrite?
>
> I'm getting up in the woild. Foist I'm called a denier, then a
> racist, then a nazi, then bubba, and now Nazoid! I've finally
> arrived!
Poor little dickieboi ain't exactly the brightest bulb on the tree. He is
very easily confused.
B'enjamin C'ramer
It's your "normative" account, faigelah. The "normative" account arseholes
like philthy matthews and Oy Vey II keep spraying around.
Do please attempt to keep up.
B'enjamin C'ramer
"Richard Warren" <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06...
You're a class "A" idiot, dickieboi. A fucktard, through and through.
B'enjamin C'ramer
> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
> Richard Warren <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>
> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
> issue and then ran away from it.
He ran away from nothing, you lying old faggot.
B'enjamin C'ramer
>
> "perfumeTheMovie" <perfume...@live.ca> wrote in message
> news:cd8a12e6-a0c0-417f...@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Dec 12, 1:22 pm, kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>>> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>>>
>>> Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>>>
>>> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
>>> issue and then ran away from it.
>>>
>>> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>>>
>>> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of
>>> the
>>> Holocaust is."
>>>
>>> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
>>> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
>>> that no "official version" existed.
>>
>>>
>>
>> Taken out of context Ken. You know that I was being sarcastic. If
>> you
>> can't get your head around that well then you can't get your head
>> around that.
>
>
>
>
>
> What a load of shit! The man quotes you verbatim
No he didn't, foo. Not that you'd ever be capable of comprehending what the
faigelah was up to. You're too fucking stupid to chew gum and maintain a
heartbeat.
B'enjamin C'ramer
Sure can. That's you and the faigelah, you fool. You deny people the right
to scrutinise your ridiculous Holocaust(tm) mythology.
B'enjamin C'ramer
"Richard Warren" <rich...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:xFX7j.6142$va7.5115@trndny08...
The bullshit is from you, dickieboi.
Why do you find it necessary to consistenly lie and make a complete 'tard of
yourself?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Wotan
>>
>
>
>
It's all a bit strange
news:S9CdnWw75-BvTP3a...@giganews.com:
>
> "Richard Warren" <rwa...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06...
>>
>> "Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in
>> message news:13m02a0...@corp.supernews.com...
>>> In article
>>> <338286e2-d347-4fa8-aafb-5c63d124a8a2
@e67g2000hsc.googlegr
>>> oups.com>, perfumeTheMovie <perfume...@live.ca>
>>> wrote:
>>>>On Dec 11, 10:13 pm, "Richard Warren"
>>>><rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> "perfumeTheMovie" <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote in
>>>>> message
>>>>>
>>>>> news:b3aeaf8e-8002-4a82-a088-b791ddbec0b4
@w40g2000hsb.go
>>>>> oglegroups.com...
>>>>>
>>>>> > On Dec 11, 5:10 pm, oneeyewo...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> >> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich"
>>>>> >> <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >> > The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo
>>>>> >> > Voigt, has questioned
>>>>> >> > the
>>>>> >> > number of Holocaust deaths
>>>>>
>>>>> >> What a surprise... LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> >> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Define the term 'nazi' if you are able.
>>>>>
>>>>> How about you first define the "official version" of
>>>>> the Holocaust, Nazoid
>>>>> hypocrite?
>>>>
>>>>I'm getting up in the woild. Foist I'm called a denier,
>>>>then a racist, then a nazi, then bubba, and now Nazoid!
>>>>I've finally arrived!
>>>>
>>>>I've previously defined the official version of the
>>>>holocaust my good man.
>>>
>>> Then a Google reference would be appropriate, since no
>>> one but you seems to recall this defining moment.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>
> You're a class "A" idiot, dickieboi. A fucktard, through
> and through.
>
>
>
Translation: I'm completely fucked for an answer so I'll post
another of my ridiculous, disjointed, nonsensical pieces of
shite.
RJ11
B'enjamin C'ramer <onlyt...@alltimes.yo> wrote:
(silly drivel given the old el-snippo)
This is how "Cramer" asserts to support "freedom of
speech", folks:
"How many times do we have to tell you that wikipedia is NOT
an unbiased source. It is a pro-yid site which should be shut down." --
posted by "Ben Cramer", Message-ID:
<YKqdnTaOYdW7R-zb...@giganews.com>.
RJ.
BTov
> "BTov" <dkast...@hotmail.com> schreef in berichtnews:7166d85b-5ff3-4e31...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Dec 12, 7:48 am, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de> wrote:
> >> "Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> schreef in
> >> berichtnews:13lv389...@corp.supernews.com...> In article
> >> <yaK7j.16717$k22.11907@trnddc02>,
> >> > Roy Roger <rro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> > Piss off, kid. Come back when you learn to speak English. Then perhaps
> >> > you
> >> > can converse
> >> > with adults.
>
> >> why donot you simply fuck off you canadian arrogant asshole i am getting
> >> fewd up with imbeciles like you. start reading the diary of Hirschfeld
> >> the
> >> jew under whose reign more than 100.000 jews were shipped east in no
> >> time.
>
> > is number one shabos goy!
> > comemorate at yad vashem!!
> > or may be vad yashem!!!
> > b'wahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > btov
> > haifa, israel
>
> Herr Tov remember the following names to which mac gay will never make any
> reference:
>
> a)Hirschfeld
>
> b)Weinreb (famous his so called lists ala Schiondler)
>
> c)Ascher & Cohen ( Judenrat chairmans)
>
> d)Kurt Schelsinger, chief jew at transfer camp Westerbork
>
> all of these guys survived at the expense of other and dies in their own bed
> with a smile on their face)- Hide quoted text -
grus gotte mister mullah!
yes is bad joowish also good joowish!!
bad joowish getting more publicities!!!
good joowish getting nobel prize!!!!
and making moneys from goyim!!!!!!
b'wahahahahahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
btov
haifa, israel
Kenneth McVay OBC
Evasion noted. You would rather not deal with my statement, or the clear truth behind it.
>> >> Be that as it may, he now claims to have defined this "official version," although no one
>> >> seems to recall his having done so.
>>
>> >> Gee... he hasn't told us who the Wiccans are that are running the White House, either.
>>
>> >Yes I have. They belong to a cabal; that doesn't make them Wiccans.
>>
>> You used the word COVEN, not cabal. Please try to focus.
>http://www.cuttingedge.org/News/n1224.cfm
>Evidence of at least two witches in Warshington. Does two make a
>coven? Maybe ole' Kissinger is involved as well? Read the 7th book
>of Moses backwards 7 times and you will reap the power of the debil.
>Better yet, why don't you (you're good at this) pretend that this post
>is serious and use it against me in the future. You excel at that
>type of dishonesty.
>
>> Must be the Toronto air...
>>
>Another Toronto hater. I can't stand the place myself. We have so
>much in common Ken; we could be friends yet you continuously attack
>me. I no longer love RW, but I do love you. You are like a dog to
>me. Am I like a master to you?
Still waiting for your Google reference to your, er, definition of that "official version
of the Holocaust."
I don't recall saying I hated Toronto... can you point me to anywhere I've indicated
that?
--
"...the antisemite is immune to refutation from either facts or logic.
An antisemite has chosen to live in hatred, without regard to either
facts or logic." (Matas, David. Bloody Speech, p. 37)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org
Kenneth McVay OBC
perfumeTheMovie <perfume...@live.ca> wrote:
>On Dec 12, 1:22 pm, kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>>
>> Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>>
>> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
>> issue and then ran away from it.
>>
>> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>>
>> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
>> Holocaust is."
>>
>> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
>> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
>> that no "official version" existed.
>
>Taken out of context Ken. You know that I was being sarcastic. If
>you
>can't get your head around that well then you can't get your head
>around that.
Evasion noted. You still haven't provided that reference to your "definition" of the
"official version of the Holocaust."
--
"Hate propaganda is an attack on the truth-seeking process itself.
It is directed to subverting and undermining the search for truth."
(David Matas, Bloody Speech, p. 37)
perfumeTheMovie
> In article <cd8a12e6-a0c0-417f-939f-60ecdbd73...@b40g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
> perfumeTheMovie <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote:
> >On Dec 12, 1:22 pm, kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
> >> In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>
> >> Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> [...]
>
> >> >It was just yesterday that he refused to define it.
>
> >> One must point out that this was not the first time he raised the
> >> issue and then ran away from it.
>
> >> You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>
> >> "OK, genius, why don't *you* tell *us* what the 'official' version of the
> >> Holocaust is."
>
> >> His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
> >> me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
> >> that no "official version" existed.
>
> >Taken out of context Ken. You know that I was being sarcastic. If
> >you
> >can't get your head around that well then you can't get your head
> >around that.
>
> Evasion noted. You still haven't provided that reference to your "definition" of the
> "official version of the Holocaust."
>
holocaust and you will find many references to the 'official' version
of the holocaust.
Why does it state on your website that 12 million were killed by
Hitler and the nazis? Do you include others besides Jews? Like
what's the rumpus.
Richard Warren
As I said in a previous post and which you conveniently overlook, all these
refernces are on antisemitic websites. Is it just a coincidence that you
accept them as gospel?
> Why does it state on your website that 12 million were killed by
> Hitler and the nazis? Do you include others besides Jews?
Duh. You truly are a genius.
Kenneth McVay OBC
perfumeTheMovie <perfume...@live.ca> wrote:
[...]
>There is no evasion mr. moronski. Google the official version of the
>holocaust and you will find many references to the 'official' version
>of the holocaust.
Thank you for conceding that YOU have not defined this "official version," which YOU have
claimed exists.
As Matt "Sterno" Giwer once pointed out in a rare moment of sobriety, "He who asserts
must prove." You have claimed this "offical version" exists, ergo you must define it.
>Why does it state on your website that 12 million were killed by
>Hitler and the nazis? Do you include others besides Jews? Like
>what's the rumpus.
Do your own homework, Bubba.
--
"But I was not diagnosed as 'morbidly obese' you evil
kike and you are perpetuating a lie started by your
fellow filthy kike hook nosed vermin named ..."
(Scott Bradbury, Bellville's Leading Revisionist Scholar)
B'enjamin C'ramer
And as I've said on numerous occasions, which you've conveniently
overlooked, dickieboi, is the fact that EVERY site which doesn't toe the yid
line is branded as being "anti-semitic" by you cunts.
You're a mouthy, yappy fool. I doubt your intelligence quotient makes it
into double figures.
It's all a bit strange
news:44mdne9ubJpks__a...@giganews.com:
> And as I've said on numerous occasions, which you've
> conveniently overlooked, dickieboi, is the fact that EVERY
> site which doesn't toe the yid line is branded as being
> "anti-semitic" by you cunts.
You actually act as if what you say is important. LOL.
perfumeTheMovie
> "perfumeTheMovie" <perfumeTheMo...@live.ca> wrote in message
So if you can't find an official version that you like then use the
official version on McVay's website. I don't like to do your thinking
for you btw.
>Is it just a coincidence that you
> accept them as gospel?
>
I don't even accept the gospel as gospel.
perfumeTheMovie
<strangethingshap...@turkeygoy.com> wrote:
> "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo> wrote innews:44mdne9ubJpks__a...@giganews.com:
>
> > And as I've said on numerous occasions, which you've
> > conveniently overlooked, dickieboi, is the fact that EVERY
> > site which doesn't toe the yid line is branded as being
> > "anti-semitic" by you cunts.
>
> You actually act as if what you say is important. LOL.
There is a lot of truth in what Mr. C'ramer says. Although I don't
think that Jews are the enemy. There are extremists in every group.
The real enemy is the coven/cabal/combine/leviathan at the top of the
pyramid. Complete with the all seeing eye(check the back of the US $1
bill.)
Who are at this moment laughing their asses off at the antics that go
on on this NG(antics instigated by that warrior of freedom, that
prince of humanity, that duke of righteousness; let's here it for Ken
McVay).
It's all a bit strange
news:bde73979-b5ce-4726-a99a-9cd957159be4
@s19g2000prg.googlegr
oups.com:
Ah, you spelled cramer wrong.
oneey...@gmail.com
> And as I've said on numerous occasions, which you've conveniently
> overlooked, dickieboi, is the fact that EVERY site which doesn't toe the yid
> line is branded as being "anti-semitic" by you cunts.
Empty words, troll. Anti-semitic websites are anti-semitic because
their point of view about holocaust is not based on historical fact
but prejudice and hatred. Twisting facts, altering words and
misleading the reader. That it is. Only a fool like you swallows it as
a whole.
--
Wotan
B'enjamin C'ramer
<oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5ec48bdd-af3d-4dde...@o42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> On 14 dec, 09:21, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo> wrote:
>
>> And as I've said on numerous occasions, which you've conveniently
>> overlooked, dickieboi, is the fact that EVERY site which doesn't toe the
>> yid
>> line is branded as being "anti-semitic" by you cunts.
>
> Empty words, troll. Anti-semitic websites are anti-semitic because
> their point of view about holocaust is not based on historical fact
> but prejudice and hatred.
Nope. Even those sites which don't mention the Holocaust(tm), and don't toe
the yid line, are branded as being anti-semitic, wankywiking.
To use a Dubya expression, to the hebes "you're either with us or you're
against us." There's no middle ground according to these stinky yids.
oneey...@gmail.com
> Nope. Even those sites which don't mention the Holocaust(tm), and don't toe
> the yid line, are branded as being anti-semitic, wankywiking.
Your assertion, prove it, troll.
>
> To use a Dubya expression, to the hebes "you're either with us or you're
> against us." There's no middle ground according to these stinky yids.
Your anti-semitism is obvious, not a surprise at all. Troll.
--
Wotan
B'enjamin C'ramer
<oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:3e9dd0ab-66ad-4dc6...@q3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> On 15 dec, 10:57, "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlytetr...@alltimes.yo> wrote:
>
>> Nope. Even those sites which don't mention the Holocaust(tm), and don't
>> toe
>> the yid line, are branded as being anti-semitic, wankywiking.
>
> Your assertion, prove it, troll.
You turds prove it yourself, dickhead. Every site you dislike you label.
>
>>
>> To use a Dubya expression, to the hebes "you're either with us or you're
>> against us." There's no middle ground according to these stinky yids.
>
> Your anti-semitism is obvious, not a surprise at all. Troll.
What anti-semitism?
That's what I refer to in the above, wankywiking.
You don't like me, ergo, I'm an anti-semite.
You're such a bunch of fools.
Ole Irish
"It's all a bit strange" <strangeth...@turkeygoy.com> wrote in
message news:Xns9A04EB014B5BB...@85.214.90.236...
Plagiarist.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Ole Irish
> "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlyt...@alltimes.yo> wrote in
>
>>
>> <oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:165f4a48-bb7a-4db8...@r60g2000hsc.google
>> groups.com...
>>> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt, has
>>>> questioned the number of Holocaust deaths
>>>
>>> What a surprise... LOL
>>>
>>> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> No, it was a murdering holocaust. I can see your confusion, your
> mistaking the phrase for your poofter movie celebration.
What the hell? Can you try that in a language I can understand?
ZULU
> In article <f2d892a1-98fb-4949...@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
> perfumeTheMovie <perfume...@live.ca> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 12, 1:22 pm, kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>>
>>>In article <YsU7j.7713$ki7.1833@trndny06>,
>>>
>>>Richard Warren <rwar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>[...]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>issue and then ran away from it.
>>>
>>>You, for instance, asked him about it on November 9th:
>>>
>>>Holocaust is."
>>>
>>>His response was "There is no official version," with a reference to
>>>me, because I had challenged his earlier contention by pointing out
>>>that no "official version" existed.
>>>
>>>he wrote, "The illegality of forming an opinion contrary to the
>>>'official' version is the true crime." In the same article that appeared in, he also made
>>>the claim that Holocaust denial was not about hate, which pretty well let everyone know
>>>where he stood.
>>>
>>>Not long after that, he complained that he had been called a racist, and labeled his
>>>earlier remarks as "a case for free speech," and said that it had been insinuated that he
>>>was a denier, "even though I have not given any indication that I am..."
>>>
>>>Of course, he *had* given an indication that he was a denier when he claimed, in his very
>>>first article, that Holocaust denial wasn't about hate.
>>>
>>>Duh.
>>>
>>You can duh all you want. I do not deny the holocaust. If someone
>>else does that doesn't necessarily make that person hateful. You do
>>like to twist things don't you.
>
> Holocaust denial is racist to the core - hatred of Jews is what spawns it. You can stomp
> your widdle feet and deny it until the cows come home, but it won't change that truth.
>
> Without hatred of Jews, there would be NO Holocaust denial.
Without Zionists the truth would have already appeared and it wouldn't exist
that DOGMA protected by liberticide acts, then no need to "deny" anything.
It's all a bit strange
news:4763acc9$0$25995$8826...@free.teranews.com:
Coward, liar, dishonorable scurv
--
Like Minded Mates
Reading from Mein Kampf
Snuggling by the fire
He shares his deepest thoughts
Holding him close
My Aryan warrior
A warm bath
Then the lights go out
Ben Cramer
Copyright ©2007 Ben Cramer
It's all a bit strange
>
> "It's all a bit strange"
> <strangeth...@turkeygoy.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A03E304220AE...@85.214.90.236...
>> "B'enjamin C'ramer" <onlyt...@alltimes.yo> wrote in
>> news:YZadnXy4eYfu5sLa...@giganews.com:
>>
>>>
>>> <oneey...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:165f4a48-bb7a-4db8-a813-368759122986
@r60g2000hsc.goog
>>> le groups.com...
>>>> On 11 dec, 17:40, "Heinrich" <Heinr...@Ruhrgasnet.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The head of the German neo-Nazi party NPD, Udo Voigt,
>>>>> has questioned the number of Holocaust deaths
>>>>
>>>> What a surprise... LOL
>>>>
>>>> Of course he denies the holocaust, he's a nazi scum.
>>>
>>> What fucking holocaust?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No, it was a murdering holocaust. I can see your
>> confusion, your mistaking the phrase for your poofter
>> movie celebration.
>
> What the hell? Can you try that in a language I can
> understand?
>
>
>
I don't speak kindergarten