Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

REPOST: Question For Yale "Phuk Phace" Edeiken... (Also Representation of the Spirit of Edeiken) Corrected Version

3 views

Skip to first unread message

Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]

unread,

Jun 2, 2001, 9:40:35 PM6/2/01

If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000 then why did you issue
a subpoena to my attorney, in July 2000, who had advised you that he was
representing me and that I was his client? (BTW why wouldn't you give him a copy
of the complaints instead of telling him "Fuck You"? How could he do anything
with the lawsuit not even knowing the accusations? You are a sleazy bastard for
sure!)

BTW Yale many higher authorities are going to see how you dealt with both my
attorney and myself in your holding back giving my attorney a copy of your
manufactured complaints and how you continued to badger me in the meantime.
You're an asshole and a shame to the legal community! Why and how on Earth could
my attorney FILE when you wouldn't even provide him with a copy of your
complaints? What an asshole and a complete sleazy bastard shyster you are. Would
you FILE and become an "Attorney of Record" for a client without even seeing a
copy of the complaint against your client? I doubt it!

Here is proof:

To verify the following archive go to the GOOGLE web site for USENET archive
retrievals <http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search> and Copy'N'Paste
the following MESSAGE ID into the field labeled: "Message ID Find the message
with message ID" and then activate GOOGLE SEARCH. Search with this ID:
ij08ftgv0dbiuanojmd910s3gn4p3vnpbs%404ax.com

On 05 May 2001 13:09:02 GMT, <20010505090902...@ng-cv1.aol.com>
dctrm...@aol.com (Andrew E. Mathis Ph.D.) wrote:

>Scott,
>
>How does it feel to be unwanted?

I have never wanted to be "wanted" by people like you or Judases.

>Look on the bright side: When Reibman rules against you

I have noticed that all of you vermin have been issuing a count down and also
declaring, as you did above, "When Reibman rules against [me]" which indicates
communication among third parties and also that you're implying the "verdict" is
already in and has been revealed. Is my perception wrong? You know what you're
implying do you not?

>and in you flee from Yale's judgment,

Yale's judgment? Yale's judgment-- why did he get his judgment? It was on
account of "non-response" and NOT on the merit of his numerous false accusations
and manufactured evidence! For a fact Yale F. Edeiken did not keep his written
agreement with my attorney and for a fact I had an attorney prior to the
August 25, 2000 judgment. Edeiken kept badgering me by snail mail and I did what
my attorney told me to do- "Return To Sender" and in the time span Yale was
harassing me against his written agreement to not make direct contact with me my
attorney was trying to get copies of the complaints to which he received a "FUCK
YOU" answer each time! Yale was not the least bit co-operative.

What higher court won't see the miscarriage of justice and un ethicalness of
Edeiken on that stunt!? Edeiken through his stooges claims I did not have
representation prior to August 28, 2000 or three days after that judgment but
according to the docket (which will also be on the desk of D.J. Joan Snyder's
desk) Edeiken issued a subpoena against Daylin B. Leach (my attorney) in
July 2000 regarding Edeiken Vs Bradbury. It is all there Andrew and that is
FACT!

From: NIZKOR WATCH (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO SPAM)
Subject: Re: Did I or Did I Not Have An Attorney Prior to August 25, 2000? YES I
Did!..
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-03-28 17:32:03 PST

(EXCERPT)

On 28 Mar 2001 03:26:41 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <btg1ctkvcj36mh728...@4ax.com>,
>doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO SPAM wrote:

[...]

> The ONLY reason Yale got that default judgment on August 25, 2000 was
> because he did NOT follow the written agreement he made with my attorney,
> which is on file, in which Yale F. Edeiken agreed to cease and desist
> from making ANY direct contact with me and that was on May 29, 2000 almost
> three months before Yale got his judgement against me.

Except you didn't HAVE an attorney. See below.

<<Doc Tavish Comment March 28, 2001: Yes I did have an attorney because
why would he have referred to me as his client in the May 29, 2000 e-mail
which Yale first denied and then later admitted existed?>>

>
> ~~~~~~~~~Proof of the May 29, 2000 Agreement~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> See this post:
>
> From: Doc Tavish (doc_tavi...@my-deja.com)
> Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Attorney - Allentown, PA (Supreme Court ID#
> 40290) Recent Lies Documented UPGRADED R 2
> Date: 2000-12-30 18:30:42 PST
>
> >>> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> >>> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine
> >>> that all of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented
> >>> to court within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not
> >>> make direct contact with me.
> >> Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.

<<Doc Tavish comment March 28, 2001: If the e-mail had not existed then
why would Yale say read it again?>>

> >>> From: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
> >>> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> >>> To: xxx...@aol.com <(just deleted my attorney's e-mail address)
> >>> References: <e8.501626...@aol.com
> >>> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> >>> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
> >>> [...] My attorney did in fact say:
> >>> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> >>> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> >>> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry. Yale did in fact reply:
> >>> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.

To which Daylin Leach responded in the negative.

<<Daylin Leach did NOT reply in the negative! He had already said:
"Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney." How is
that replying in the negative? He referred to me using "my client" which
proves you to be a liar! Remember Yale later admitted in this post that
the e-mail existed! Care to stay in denial pig? Here is what you deleted:
From the very post (above) which you gutted:

>>> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
>>> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
>> Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.

<<Notice that Yale has called me a liar from the beginning concerning an
e-mail communication between my attorney and him and how he denied such
e-mail existed and Yale even suggested that I forged it BUT now he admits
it exists and at the same time calls me the liar!? Does the term
pathological liar ring a bell?)... End of Doc Tavish Comment>>

Therefore, there was no agreement, since Mr. Leach did NOT bother to
file an appearance until AUGUST 28, 2000.

<<Doc Tavish comment March 28, 2001: How could my attorney file an
appearance- he didn't even have a copy of the complaint and when he tried
to get a copy Yale responded with "Fuck You" which has been admitted to
court! Care to deny that Yale does not furnish his "victims" with copies
of complaints? He did the same thing to David Michael too! Care to deny
it?

LOOK!

Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
NNTP-Posting-Host: async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk
X-Trace: 10 Sep 2000 17:14:15 GMT, async170-6.nas.onetel.net.uk

[...]

Mr Edeiken has filed a lawsuit against me in Pennsylvania. No documents
were ever served on me with regard to this lawsuit. Moreover, it stated
no cause of action. As Mr Edeiken had obviously assumed that I would
chicken out, allowing the thing simply to lapse unserved, I appointed an
attorney in PA to deal with him in a very non-chickenly way.

I recently received a communication from that attorney's paralegal that
stated, inter alia:

<begin quote>
Please be advised that we have filed the Rule to Show Cause in your
case. Mr. Edeiken must now move forward with this matter and file a
complaint . . . we are awaiting the statutory allowed time period during
which Mr. Edeiken can make a response.
<end quote>

Mr Edeiken evidently thought that he could use the law to silence
certain revisionist posters here.

We are now waiting for HIM to produce his arguments and evidence and
place them before the courts where he may rest assured that they will
meet a vigorous response.

~~End Of Archival Excerpt~~

Notice that Yale F. Edeiken did NOT serve his complaint on David either!
end of Doc Tavish Comment>>

Face it, Mr. Bradbury, your so-called attorney didn't EXIST as your
attorney until he FILED HIS APPEARANCE in August. It is not Mr.
Edeiken's responsibility to pretend you have an attorney when the person
you claim is your attorney never bothered to file.

<<Doc Tavish comment March 28, 2001: How could my attorney who told
Edeiken on May 29, 2000 that I was his client file when he had not
received the complaint? Edeiken did my attorney the same way he did
David's! As for me not having an attorney then why did Yale F. Edeiken
on "July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." This is on the docket of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
and anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how
Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
610-782-3148
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786"

I did have an attorney as established on July 14, 2000! Why would Yale be
wanting to subpoena my attorney in Edeiken Vs Bradbury if I didn't have an
attorney!? Once again my enemies lie! End of Doc Tavish Comment>>

In fact, on FEBRUARY 7th, 2001, YOUR ATTORNEY TOLD JUDGE REIBMAN THAT
YOU HAD NO REPRESENTATION PRIOR TO AUGUST 28, in other words, you were
NOT represented when the default judgement was handed down.

<<Doc Tavish comment March 28, 2001: Once again you lie because the docket
shows the above intent to serve a subpoena and also Edeiken acknowledged
on May 29, 2000 that I had an attorney!>>

~~End of GOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

>they will put a bench warrant out on your fat ass.

I've heard that same intimidation before and District Justice Snyder will also
see samples of how an attorney behaved in public forum against the Defendant
while in th capacity of the Plaintiff's Attorney!

>Maybe they'll even put up your photo in the Post Office.

Your intimidation won't work socialist!

>Then you can feel "wanted."

I don't ever want to be wanted by your kind and you're still miffed that I
didn't want your company when I repeatedly declined having a drink with you.

>This is like rats fleeing the sinking ship. Too bad it's over in THREE DAYS...

That is what you think! I will lay odds Edeiken will lose his license to
practice law and possibly get jail time for manufacturing evidence among other
things over me being impacted anyway over his chickenshit lawsuit (other than
what I have paid so far in attorney fees and who know I will probably get it all
back and more!).

BTW how many civil lawsuits are upheld when it is proven the Plaintiff's
Attorney engaged in criminal acts, harassment, and invasion of privacy against
the Defendant? Yale posting false information concerning the medical record that
I gave him permission to verify is a no no too! District Justice Joan Snyder
will also receive a pristine copy of that medical record along with this Edeiken
post:

From: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
(DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com)
Subject: Still in Denial Sara "Perjurer" Salzman Covers For Yale F. Edeiken
Making False Claims About My Medical Records
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 2001-03-22 22:50:08 PST

(EXCERPT)

Sara Salzman wrote:
>Thank you so much for proving my point.

Proving your point?!?! Your point was:
>> >OF COURSE IT DOESN'T SAY 'MORBID OBESITY." THAT'S BECAUSE YALE ___NEVER
>> >POSTED___ YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS.
>> >You're not only a complete idiot, you're a gullible one.
>> >Yale never said he posted your medical records. YOU did. Yale made some
>> >general statements, and YOU claimed he had posted your records.

Said in reply to my previous:

>> >> Patrick if you give me permission in public forum so it is documented
>> >> I will snail mail you with your permission a copy of "50 04882 6 9356"
>> >> and I want you to carefully look it over to see if it mentions "Morbid
>> >> Obesity" or even my height or my weight. The medical document in question does
>> >> NOT even have weight NOR height fields on it! Care to look?...

You, still being in denial claim as your point: "OF COURSE IT DOESN'T SAY
'MORBID OBESITY." THAT'S BECAUSE YALE ___NEVER POSTED___ YOUR MEDICAL
RECORDS."

Yale posted these words: ""According tot he discharge summary, oince
of the diafnoises made by Hermann Hospital was "morbid obesity... You
have been tppld to exercise and lose weight.... Hermann Hostital listed
your height as 6'1" and told you that one of your pronlems wsa "morbid
obesity." as documented below with the GOOGLE URLs to access them for
verification. If Yale has done as you blindly still maintain with your
words: "OF COURSE IT DOESN'T SAY 'MORBID OBESITY." THAT'S BECAUSE YALE
___NEVER POSTED___ YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS" then from what source was he
making his as you said: "some general statements"? Yale did afterall say
as shown and documented: "oince of the diafnoises made by Hermann Hospital
was "morbid obesity.. Hermann Hostital listed your height as 6'1" and told
you that one of your pronlems wsa "morbid obesity." What was the source of
Yale's dis info? The Houston Chronicle? Yale was claiming these were the
words of Hermann Hospital! Now I ask how many more times are you going to
be in denial?

The ONLY way I can remotely accept your "point" is that you are admitting
that Yale F. Edeiken LIED about what my medical records said THUS proving
your "point" which you stated as: "OF COURSE IT DOESN'T SAY 'MORBID
OBESITY." THAT'S BECAUSE YALE ___NEVER POSTED___ YOUR MEDICAL RECORDS" in
reply to my: "I want you to carefully look it over to see if it mentions
"Morbid Obesity" or even my height or my weight. The medical document in
question does NOT even have weight NOR height fields on it!"

Once again here is the challenge (first announced to Steve Wolk):

<START>

On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:34:18 GMT, pat...@io.com (Patrick L. Humphrey)
wrote:

>Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@scottsmail.com> writes:

[...]

>>You've never seen me so how can you make such an erroneous statement dick
>>wad?

>Your medical records, SuperSleuth -- the ones you gave directions to
>obtaining.

You mean the medical record that I referred to in the following which I
personally gave Edeiken permission to verify as in:

Subject: Delusional Yale F. Edeiken Spews His Dementia
Date: 12/30/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>

[...]

[Addressed to Yale F. Edeiken at the time of the original public posting.]

Additional information-- I know how you like to invade my privacy and
issue subpoenas. You think I made the above up to escape your deposition
but the order about my NOT driving was issued December 22, 1999 or eight
whole days before I had an official notice that you had even filed a
lawsuit! If you wish to verify this then contact:
Hermann Hospital
Medical Records
P.O. Box 200758
Houston, Texas 77216-0758

The discharge document which has an area on it which says:
"Resumption of Normal Activities" has entered:
Date you can return to work: HOLD
Date you can resume driving a car: HOLD
Date you can resume your normal sexual activities: 12/22/99
(At least they didn't want me to be miserable on top of not being
able to work or drive! :-) Tavish comment)
The release document is dated 12/22/99 and its number is:
50 04882 6 9356

<END>

Patrick if you give me permission in public forum so it is documented I
will snail mail you with your permission a copy of "50 04882 6 9356" and I
want you to carefully look it over to see if it mentions "Morbid Obesity"
or even my height or my weight. The medical document in question does NOT
even have weight NOR height fields on it! Care to look?...

~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~

Here is Yale lying through his teeth about what said record contained:

From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Allan Mathews' Liberal Love and Tolerance Manifested --
Aren't Lefties "Nice" People?!
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
Message-ID: <JT6z5.795$np1.1...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 18:46:01 GMT

Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:kr8osscef1a47ihc0...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:19:24 +0100, david_michael
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >Allan Matthews wrote:
> >
> >> In article <39CBDCFD...@onetel.net.uk>,
> >> david_...@onetel.net.uk says...
> >> He's a deadbeat who supposedly can't work because he's such a lazy
> >> porker his blood pressure is dangerously high.
> Care to substantiate your actionable libel big mouth?

You already have.

> Oooh but the hate shows! You lefties are supposed to be the loving types
> full of tolerance and understanding! I am actually glad that you filth
> show your hateful hypocrisy because that is the only way you can get back
> at me for what I post. Expect more articles chronicling how Jews view
> non-Jews in upcoming days!

You are reaping what you have sown, Bradshit.

<<Doc Tavish comment March 21, 2001: You're about to reap a real whirlwind
Yale. You have been identified as "nazihunter" who incited murder against
me and you subpoenaed medical records, thus invading my privacy, and then
made alleged details public which is against PA Code. See the proof at the
bottom of this post. I will press every charge I can against you too!>>

> My high blood pressure as well as my other medical problems come from
> permanent nerve damage due to (possibly) exposure to some chemical agent
> (lead) that caused such. I have nerve damage in the area of my right ear
> and in my upper spinal column.

According tot he discharge summary, oince of the diafnoises made by
Hermann Hospital was "morbid obesity." That is well-jnow contributing
factor for both jyoertension and sleep apnea.

> My activity level has nothing to do with it. I am under doctor's orders to
> not even mow my yard because of fainting spells etc. I don't really give a
> damn if you believe me or not you pernicious little shit but that's a
> fact.

You have been tppld to exercise and lose weight.

> As for me being a porker-- I'm 6-3-1/2 and I carry my weight more like a
> quarter back than a waddling little penguin like Edeiken or a bulldog like
> Sara Salzman.

When you are wearing high-heeled shoes. mabye? Or have you been growing
altely. Hermann Hostital listed your height as 6'1" and told you that one
of your pronlems wsa "morbid obesity."

> >> Boogerman should have thought of that before he took the actions that
> >> got him in such hot water. He has no one but himself to blame for his
> >> predicament.
> What did I do? Care to name exactly what I did?

The allegations amde against you in court. All of which you have already
admitted were accurate.

Now go eat a pizza.... or two ... or three . . ..or four.

[...]

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As for Yale's statement: "You have been tppld to exercise and lose
weight"- I was NOT told such and I was NEVER told anything about my weight
and for a fact the discharge summary of Hermann Hospital for my December
22, 1999 discharge date had neither my height nor weight on the document.
The document did not even have fields for height or weight!

How well do you think that will set to a District Justice especially when she
sees the medical record in p;erson and sees the above post with my asking her
what purpose did the above serve Yale in prosecuting his lawsuit!

Yale F. Edeiken should receive the harshest punishment the law allows. Too bad
the state does not inflict corporal punishment for he is deserving!

Doc Tavish
>a.m.

---
Concerning unethical attorneys and judges in the State of Pennsylvania:
<http://www.clr.org/pa.html> Yale F. Edeiken --Attorney at Law -
Supreme Court ID# 40290 -- See how Yale likes to push women around in this link:
http://www.mcall.com/cgi-bin/slwebsto.cgi?DBLIST=mc90&DOCNUM=39046
(This is a swine who sued me for being violent!!)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

ASCII ART: To view the graphic you should set your news browser to view 80
columns and this is a must- set your fonts to a fixed width font such as courier
to see the image in full fidelity. If you use a proportional font or Windows
True Type proportional font the image will be grossly distorted.

You need to use a font which is 8 point. Any larger of a font may cause the
image to severely distort.

I "rendered" the image in 8 point size. You may use Windows True Type fonts if
they are fixed width such as Courier New (Western) but be warned most Windows
True Type fonts are proportional width. YOU MAY ALSO SELECT ALL TEXT AND CLICK
TO MAKE IT "BOLD" AS THIS SOMETIMES HELPS THE DEFINITION OF HARDCOPY.

Image "rendered" by Doc Tavish and given to public domain. More to come!

XXX*
*#############XX###X
*### X##############* X###
#*## #####X#################* X# X#**
*#X*#* ####XXXX################## ## XX***
**## *X#####*** *#######################* ##X *###*XX##
### X#####X* X########XXX################################
### *X###X* ####XXXX** ***XX###################X###XX##
#XX *X####* ###* XXXX###################* X
##XX*####X**X #XX* ** *XX#######################
#####XX* X*** ****################**##*
*#XXX####X *X** *** **XX ** *****#################*###
## **###** **** **X ***#X **** *##################X###
## X######*### *XXXXX##X X######** #########X############*
##* #######X*## ######* **#########X *X###################*
##X#####X####*#X X###*#X X#######X####X#X *XX###############X*##X
#*X#* *##X##* **X####*X##########X **###########XX X##X#
###* X##*** ###**####*** ***####X **#####*XX* ####X*X#
###* *##X ***####X* *X####**** **##### ####XX ##
X## ####*****####* **##***XX*##### ##XX#X*###
###* * ##X#####X#### *###**XX**#### ##X*X#X ###
X#### ##X *X# #* *####* *##**X#X*X##* XX###*** *##X
##*##X**XX*X### * ###### *##******X## **##X* *X*##
#X X##########* **######* ###X **##**XX**X## ***##X*XX#X##
*##*######### ** ***########*#### *X##****X *X###**#####XX### ##
## ##**#### *######XX########X**####**XXXX**#### #########* #
##*## ##XX X###X X#########XX ***XXX *#### ######## *#
##*#### *XX* ###X** ****** *###***### X ##X
##X#* * *XX#* ###X#X* ****#### ***####X
X### *#####* #####X** ***X#####* ***###
## **#######X ######XXX******XX######X*XX###
#X XX###XX##* ##*#########****X############
*# *X###****** **** *###XX***X###X#
#X * *X####X** *X#########* *XX****X#####
# ** *X#####**XX#############* X****X#####
*X *################**###### ***XX#### ###
X* ** *X###########*####X###X****** **##X##X#####*
# ** *X###X##########X##XX##X** ** **##### *X##X
# ** ***##############*##**X###X X####X *
#* **########################X###*X###*
## *X#X######*X######X*****X###X######
*# **##########X######## *##X# ##XX
# *X####XXXXXX#####* #X *##*# X##X###*
*# *############*** ##X *##* ###XX XX**#
# *####X**** *##* X## *#*######****X######
## ##X* *X##* * *### X####XX#############X
*# *##X* *X##X *X ### XX#####X*X##XX *
X# **###############X* *#####X
## **#############X* *####
X#*XX####X *******X####
####X X############XX
*######XX*

========= WAS CANCELLED BY =======:
Message-ID: <dw1upnf0jid7bzm4f...@4ax.com>
Control: cancel <ak2jhtc4oig0cij1a...@4ax.com>
Subject: cmsg cancel <ak2jhtc4oig0cij1a...@4ax.com>
From: Ivan Tavishiski <REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TAVISHISKIS>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Date: 5 Jun 2001 23:56:33 GMT
Lines: 56
Path: news.unitel.co.kr!news-xfer.nuri.net!enews.sgi.com!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!news-out.nibble.net!news-in.nibble.net!hub1.meganetnews.com!news1.meganetnews.com
Xref: news.unitel.co.kr control:56637032

Tcst tpnnu euews tat getr fcrv tys
ssfo oimh iluoeerog rfnav ohydfs tplrr i ryo
tmt ucm fii erhte peehe afa roee?

Tsaad ecmy ehou ycr slsy eeb lmtn y lye erwf enl
toeeie aifw sedrr tes woetadu totb oeipd poewdrt ddi
llni odtu dpl trtd ecc eiav otns i ait fafdr
ucse usb eta rvw ibtfre nwarat rias wtpu
hgyp nau fitg xeir oi rso efhin
ihesltep eaatkg tldtrrep puss egrspcpt wixt drnlodro iscra ii
<remainder snipped>

Yale F. Edeiken

unread,

Jun 10, 2001, 2:12:20 AM6/10/01

Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]
<REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL-
CAPS-TAVISHISKIS> wrote in message
news:8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-_-$@news.noc.cabal.int...

> If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000

You did not. You have a copy of the docket.

Why are you afraid to print the date when your attorney entered his
appearance.

Why did you claim in court that you had no attorney representing you
until AFTER the default was filed.

>How could he do anything
> with the lawsuit not even knowing the accusations?

At no time did Daylin Leach request a copy of the Complaint.

A copy was served upon you as required by law. If you threw it out or
otherwise failed to contact an attorney you thought was representing you,
that is YOUR problem.

Finally, in a verified pleading in September, you claimed that no
Complaint had been filed or served.

Why did you commit perjury?

> BTW Yale many higher authorities are going to see how you dealt with both
my
> attorney and myself in your holding back giving my attorney a copy of your
> manufactured complaints and how you continued to badger me in the
meantime.

And they will examine the docket and discover that you were not
represented by an attorney and that I followed the requrements of the law.

They will also discover that you submitted false verifed pleadings to
the court. openly defied court orders. and admitted all factual averments in
the Complaint.

> You're an asshole and a shame to the legal community! Why and how on Earth
could
> my attorney FILE when you wouldn't even provide him with a copy of your
> complaints?

The law requires service upon you.

You were serrved.

At no time did any person request a copy of the Complaint.

What an asshole and a complete sleazy bastard shyster you are. Would
> you FILE and become an "Attorney of Record" for a client without even
seeing a
> copy of the complaint against your client? I doubt it!

Quite frequently since actions are frequently commenced in Pennsylvania
by Writ of Summons (as was done in this case). In fact, it would be
malpracticenot to enter my appearance.

I suggest you take the docket entries and ask another lawyer what
happened.

It's odd to watch Bradbury bellow,
For he's really a cowardly fellow.
Though he tries to act tough
With threats, bluster, and bluff
His belly's a deep shade of yellow.

The remainder of this delusional and dishonest post from the diseased mind
of Scott Bradbury (doc_t...@my-deja.com) writing under the name of ""Doc
Tavish"" is deleted as the garbage that it is. This garbled rant contains
material that, as the author knows or should know is factually inaccurate.
As a result this publication is defamatory. An immediate retraction and
apology is hereby demanded.

Scott Bradbury of Bellville, Texas, is well-known for his tortured
perversion of Christianity which he espouses and for spamming his barely
coherent ravings to dozens of unrelated newsgroups. He is a notorious liar
and anti-Semite whose activities are characterized by utter dishonesty and
include such criminal activities as forging the posts of others and issuing
death threats. He has threatened one person who exposed his lies with sexual
molestation, torture, death and mutilation. There is, of course, not a word
of truth in the venom he spews so freely.

For a refutation of this and his other lies about the Talmud and Judaism
consult:
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Cyprus/8815/

--YFE

The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/

Doc Tavish

unread,

Jun 10, 2001, 3:19:20 AM6/10/01

On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:12:20 GMT, <8dEU6.90336$gA.22...@monger.newsread.com>
"Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:

>
>Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]
><REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL-
>CAPS-TAVISHISKIS> wrote in message
>news:8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-_-$@news.noc.cabal.int...
>> If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000

> You did not. You have a copy of the docket.

If I did not have an attorney prior to August 25, 2000 then why did you subpoena
Daylin Leach regarding Edeiken Vs Bradbury? Yes, I do have a copy of the docket
and it shows you issuing a subpoena in July 2000! D.J. Snyder will see it as
well as your lies in this post.

> Why are you afraid to print the date when your attorney entered his
>appearance.

I do not know the exact date. It doesn't matter to me.

> Why did you claim in court that you had no attorney representing you
>until AFTER the default was filed.

I made no such claim. You're hearing voices again! See how your mental illness
warps reality for you? My attorney sent me a copy of your May 29, 2000 written
agreement that you would stop making direct contact with me and he referred to
me as his client too! You initially denied the e-mail existed, then you claimed
I forged it, and then you admitted it was real. All documented here you stupid
lying hog:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=2&ic=1&selm=civ2ctshdpmu6idqjktk7kim5dtrcfm8qi%404ax.com

From: NIZKOR WATCH (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO SPAM)

Subject: Why Does Sara Salzman Keep Lying About Lawsuits Vs Criminal
Prosecutions? She is Not Alone in the Mire Either!aka Re: About NIZKOR Defaming
Me And Their Legal Ties to B'nai Brith _ R 2
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism, soc.history, soc.culture.jewish, alt.flame.jews
Date: 2001-03-27 22:06:04 PST

All of your lies are fully documented and are undeniable! You are a pathological
liar who has not one bit of pride.

>>How could he do anything
>> with the lawsuit not even knowing the accusations?

> At no time did Daylin Leach request a copy of the Complaint.

He did so and you told him "FUCK YOU." It's his word against yours you
disgusting pile of hog doo.

> A copy was served upon you as required by law. If you threw it out or
>otherwise failed to contact an attorney you thought was representing you,
>that is YOUR problem.

I NEVER GOT IT! YOU DID ME THE SAME WAY YOU DID DAVID MICHAEL. His attorney
could never get a copy of your complaints either! care to deny it and show how
many more lies you're caught in?

> Finally, in a verified pleading in September, you claimed that no
>Complaint had been filed or served.

It wasn't.

> Why did you commit perjury?

I am not the one committing perjury and manufacturing evidence. YOU ARE!

>> BTW Yale many higher authorities are going to see how you dealt with both
>>my attorney and myself in your holding back giving my attorney a copy of your
>> manufactured complaints and how you continued to badger me in the
>>meantime.

> And they will examine the docket and discover that you were not
>represented by an attorney and that I followed the requrements of the law.

There is a written record which you verified as existing which proves I was
represented by an attorney. The link I included above shows your archived
admission. YOUR WORDS TOO YALE!

> They will also discover that you submitted false verifed pleadings to
>the court. openly defied court orders.

You are a mentally disturbed kook.

>and admitted all factual averments in the Complaint.

I admitted to not one of your kook and fabricated accusations your mentally
disturbed bastard.

>>You're an asshole and a shame to the legal community! Why and how on Earth
>>could my attorney FILE when you wouldn't even provide him with a copy of your
>> complaints?

> The law requires service upon you.
>
> You were serrved.
>
> At no time did any person request a copy of the Complaint.

I'll make damned good and sure to make sure that the system which reigns in PA
sees this latest lie!

>> What an asshole and a complete sleazy bastard shyster you are. Would
>> you FILE and become an "Attorney of Record" for a client without even
>> seeing a copy of the complaint against your client? I doubt it!

> Quite frequently since actions are frequently commenced in Pennsylvania
>by Writ of Summons (as was done in this case). In fact, it would be
>malpracticenot to enter my appearance.
>
> I suggest you take the docket entries and ask another lawyer what
>happened.

I have and they said you're a shyster!

BTW do you still push women around like you did Deputy Brenda Hartmann?

Scott Bradbury

Yale F. Edeiken

unread,

Jun 10, 2001, 12:16:04 PM6/10/01

Doc Tavish <doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM> wrote in message
news:bh66it0r2247kgc44...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:12:20 GMT,
<8dEU6.90336$gA.22...@monger.newsread.com>
> "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]
>
><REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL
-
> >CAPS-TAVISHISKIS> wrote in message
> >news:8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-_-$@news.noc.cabal.int...
> >> If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000
>
> > You did not. You have a copy of the docket.
>
> If I did not have an attorney prior to August 25, 2000

What does the docket say?

It says you're lying.

Some scientists who study the brain
Went to Bellville, Scott Bradbury to train.
After several long years
of sweat, toil and tears
They taught Scott to come in from the rain.

0 new messages