KOK LIST FOR JANUARY 2005
Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer
public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
Matthew Ackerman
132 N The Orch
Hightstown, NJ
609-443-3579
Alien (See Ralf Peter Loserth)
Howard J Aubrey (Madayn67)
2105 Iris PL
Bethlehem,PA 18018
610-691-3197
Jeffrey G. Brown (Darius Just)
8357 SUMMITRIDGE
CINCINNATI OH 45255
alph...@GEEKMAN.COM>
Tel: 513-474-1953
Fax: 513-474-9678
Wife: Susan Brown
Lynn Kenneth Circle
6026 Portal Dr
Houston, TX 77096
713-726-9327
Susan Cohen
710 Burnt Mills Ave
Silver Spring, MD 20901
301-681-9193
WILLIAM H DAFFER
112 CHARLES ST
ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401
WARNING: The below person is very dangerous and
unstable and has a prior criminal record.
YALE F EDEIKEN
918 N BAYARD ST
ALLENTOWN PA 18104
1-610-435-9820
Bankruptcies
Court Location: PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN - READING
Case Number: 9722394
Date Filed: 06/02/1997
Discharge Date: 10/17/1997
Debtor Name: EDEIKEN YALE F
Address: 918 BAYARD ST, ALLENTOWN, PA 18104-3759
David Gorski (ORAC)
Cancer Institute of New Jersey
195 Little Albany St
New Brunswick NJ
08901-1977
Another address for David Gorski
David Gorski
53 W Jackson Blvd
Chicago, IL 60604-3606
1-312-427-1610
Patrick J Groff
5152 College Gardens Ct
San Diego, CA 92115
1-619-582-1603
CHARLES D HALL
2698 20-A 8 AVE 20-A
NEW YORK, NY 10030
Patricia F. Heil
15688 Bloomfield Dr
Woodbridge, VA 22193-5705
703-730-1922
Steven Horn (KCOM)
1836 NW 11th St
Oklahoma City, OK 73106
(405) 524-0576
Patrick Lee Humphrey
7500 Bellerive #1807
Houston, Texas 77036-3040
1-713-266-7764
Married to an excessively obese homely skank named Dale.
http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html
Ron Jacobson
6 Auburn Ct
Brookline, MA 02446-6331
617-734-5569
Darius Just (See Jeffrey G. Brown)
KCOM (See Steve Horn)
Patrick Keenan
501 Clinton
Toronto, ON M6G2Z3
(416) 534 - 9707
Daniel Keren
1930 E 17th St
Brooklyn, NY 11229-3408
1-718-375-6419
PAUL P KNEISEL (TALLPAUL)
1332 RIVERSIDE DR UNIT 54
NEW YORK, NY 10033
PAUL P KNEISEL (PO815) tall...@NYCT.NET
anti-fascism.org
200 East Tenth Street #603
New York,, NY 10003
212-568-6690
->Anti-fascism.org's phone is in the name of Joel B. Mora<-
JOEL B MORA
92 WADSWORTH AVE UNIT 11
NEW YORK, NY 10033
CHRIS C LARSON
8691 106TH AVE SE OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-3141
PO BOX 263 OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-3141
8691 106TH AVE SE OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-2147
Ken Lewis
602 Elm Street Apt. 5
Quesnel, BC V2J3X1
(250) 747 - 1121
Picture: http://www.einsatzgruppenarchives.com/ken/ken2.jpg
RALF PETER LOSERTH (Alien)
19519 AZURE OAK
SAN ANTONIO, TX 78258
ANDREW E MATHIS
760 N 41 St
Philadelphia, PA 19104
215-243-0641
work
Andrew E. Mathis
Dept. of English
Villanova University
Villanova, PA 19085
215-893-1759
and...@mathis.net
Allan Matthews
64 Margaret St
Arlington, MA 02474
781-646-5281
Gord McFee
609 Noble Cresc
Ottawa Ontario K1V 7J1
613-731-1150
Gord McFee's supervisor:
The Honourable Jane Stewart
Minister of Human Resources Development
140 Promenade du Portage
Phase IV, 14th floor
Hull, Quebec K1A 0J9
She may be e-mailed directly at:
min.hr...@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
Enquiries may be directed to her press secretary:
Anna Kapiniari
Press Secretary
Minister of Human Resources Development
(819) 994-0325
www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
Complaints about Mr McFee should be directed to his more immediate
superior, Claire Morris:
Deputy Minister and Chairperson
Ms Claire Morris
Human Resources Development Canada
140 Promenade du Portage
Place du Portage, Phase IV
Hull, Quebec K1A 0J9
Ken McVay
home
995 Bowen Road, Apt. 3108
Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4, Canada.
1-250-616-9431
work
Ken McVay Consulting Group
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
John Morris
Department of English
University of Alberta
3-5 Humanities Centre
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E5
Tel.(780) 492-3258
Fax: (780) 492-8142
(If John is not in the department, his supervisor is
Dr Stephen R Reimer, who you can email at
stephen...@ualberta.ca.
Dr Reimer can also be contacted at:
11772 - 37 Ave NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6J 0J4,
tel.(780) 434-7497.)
Our only token negroid who is the poster boy
for affirmative action and for being one stupid
big buck negroid.
CHRISTOPHER C MORTON
419 MAIKE PL APT A
FREMONT OH 43420
1-419-355-9071
http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/hilary.gif
Hilary Ostrov
38 Leopold Place Unit 702
New Westminster, BC
V3L 2C6
604-525-3055
Sexually frustrated woman inflicted with _kraurosis
vulvae_ which drives her inner bitch. She is too stupid to
know they have ointments available for her affliction.
Try some Vagisil as a lubricant instead of KY Jelly the next
time you do your dildo workout Hilary.
Michael Ragland
18252 Old Triangle Road
Triangle VA 22172
Tel 703 361 5256
Orac: See David Gorski
Roger@ . Is suspected nym of Yale Edeiken
Joel (and Felicia) Rosenberg
3925 15TH AVE S
Minneapolis
MN 55407
Tel 612 822 2415
Jeffrey E. Salzberg
2051 9th St.
Sarasota, FL 34237-3401
(941) 365-5221
Sara Salzman
4015 S Killarney Way
Aurora, CO 80013
United States
Tel 303 617 9412
Sara Salzman's father
LEON B SALZMAN
4550 N PARK AVE
CHEVY CHASE MD 20815
(301) 657-1137
Marvin A Sebourn (OSUGEOGRAPHY)
2802 Haystack Ln
Enid, OK 73703-1658
580-237-5258
osugeo...@aol.com
Oklahoma State University; Department of Geography
http://www.geog.okstate.edu/students/students.htm
Marvin Sebourn, B.S., Oklahoma State University, Research Assistant
Marvin's supervisor:
Office of the Vice President for Research and Technology
203 Whitehurst, Stillwater, OK 74078-1020
(405) 744-6501 (ph)
(405) 744-6244 (fax) v...@okstate.edu
http://www.okstate.edu/
Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK 74078 | 405 744-5000
President of OSU: DAVID J. SCHMIDLY
Laurence B. Shiff (Nazihunter)
(Residence)
Dr Laurence B. Shiff
327 Cortleigh Boulevard
Toronto, Ontario M5N 1R2 CA
Tel: 416-785-4574
(Office)
KASPU COM
2788 Bathurst St.
Toronto, Ontario m6b3a3 CA
Tel: 416-789-5691
(FAX) 416-789-5691
E-Mail: sh...@kaspu.com
ARTHUR J TANDY (Joebruno, Bruno, Black Knight, Sailor57)
1737 HOLLISTER ST #14
SAN DIEGO CA 92154
(619) 423-2950
Steven T Wolk
6037 Loganwood Dr
Rockville, MD 20852-3459
301-230-2151
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote
in message <64ZLMZDN3836...@reece.net.au>:
>All entries below collated from various sources and are
>public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
>purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
Published at least once a month, by the pathetic ignorant hypocritical
lying little babychild's comrades and despite zir lies to the
contrary, a unique low in net.thuggery.
Care to try and document any similar posting being made even *once*
with the names, addresses and phone numbers not only of posters on the
denier side, but their co-workers and parents who have never even
posted to Usenet, and with a callous disregard for the privacy of
those people whose information is inaccurately reported as be
associated with someone who has pissed off your degenerate friends?
Mr.Extreme
Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> All entries below collated from various sources and are
> public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
> purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
DERRICK MANDEL AKA.(MR.EXTREME,DIKKY
BOY,BJ,DAWG,CORNHOLIO,PEE PEE,PECKER CHECKER)
DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS
PROTECTIVE CUSTODY UNIT
CHILD MOLESTER
BLACK MALE?
BLACK KINKY HAIR
BLACK EYES
BLUE GUMS
GOLD FRONT TOOTH
5'3",98LBS.,
TATTOO'S OF LITTLE NAKED BOYS ON BOTH ARMS.
NOT DANGEROUS
Mr.Extreme
Tommy wrote:
> Roger A. Felts wrote:
>
>
>>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote
>> in message <64ZLMZDN3836...@reece.net.au>:
>>
>>
>>>All entries below collated from various sources and are
>>>public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
>>>purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
>>
>>Published at least once a month, by the pathetic ignorant hypocritical
>>lying little babychild's comrades and despite zir lies to the
>>contrary, a unique low in net.thuggery.
>
>
> I don't know who posted that, nor do I care.
>
>
>>Care to try and document any similar posting being made even *once*
>>with the names, addresses and phone numbers not only of posters on the
>>denier side, but their co-workers and parents who have never even
>>posted to Usenet, and with a callous disregard for the privacy of
>>those people whose information is inaccurately reported as be
>>associated with someone who has pissed off your degenerate friends?
>
>
> So what, What are you going to do about it wigger?
>
>
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Roger A. Felts wrote:
>
> > In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> > (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> > someone claiming to be Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote
> > in message <64ZLMZDN3836...@reece.net.au>:
> >
> >>All entries below collated from various sources and are
> >>public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
> >>purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
> >
> > Published at least once a month, by the pathetic ignorant hypocritical
> > lying little babychild's comrades and despite zir lies to the
> > contrary, a unique low in net.thuggery.
>
> I don't know who posted that, nor do I care.
>
> > Care to try and document any similar posting being made even *once*
> > with the names, addresses and phone numbers not only of posters on the
> > denier side, but their co-workers and parents who have never even
> > posted to Usenet, and with a callous disregard for the privacy of
> > those people whose information is inaccurately reported as be
> > associated with someone who has pissed off your degenerate friends?
>
> So what, What are you going to do about it wigger?
"Wigger."
The little child Tommy has finally graduated to the most vile and
nauseating level possible.
One question, Tommy: do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
Sara
--
I'm not a denier..Some Jews died of typhus and stuff, I will acknowledge
that..
--- Little Child Tommie
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> He's wigger...Go look at his post in alt.non.racism
>
> > One question, Tommy: do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
> >
>
> Do you kiss your daddy with your mouth? Need I repost that vile, sick,
> fisting shit that you write? Is that what you kiss your daddy with?
Ah, back to that, are we?
And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
admitted liar and death-faker) that I wrote any of those?
Darius Just
> Roger wrote:
...
>> Care to try and document any similar posting being made even *once*
>> with the names, addresses and phone numbers not only of posters on the
>> denier side, but their co-workers and parents who have never even
>> posted to Usenet, and with a callous disregard for the privacy of
>> those people whose information is inaccurately reported as be
>> associated with someone who has pissed off your degenerate friends?
>
> So what, What are you going to do about it wigger?
That was a challenge, dickless pigshit. And as usual, you ran away
crying.
--- dj
Darius Just
> Sara Salzman wrote:
...
>> The little child Tommy has finally graduated to the most vile and
>> nauseating level possible.
>
> He's wigger.
Translation: you know that Roger is going to kick your pathetic lying ass
in any discussion on any topic -- so, being the submoronic coward that you
are, you fling what you think is an epithet and run away crying.
--- dj
Test User
news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> P.S.
>
> I see you as you see me..
>
> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>
> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.
And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you this
way?
Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't bother
to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
You certainly do illustrate the poverty of your education, Tommy.
HTH
Darius Just
> Test User wrote:
>
>> "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
>>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>>>
>>> P.S.
>>>
>>> I see you as you see me..
>>>
>>> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>>>
>>> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
>>> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
>>> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
>>> beings.
>>
>>
>> And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
>> this way?
>
> Just assumed she's keeping Kosher.
Why?
>> Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't
>> bother to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
>>
>> http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
>>
>
> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
> opened? Hmmmm?
Which Jews hold that view, idiot dickless pigshit?
--- dj
Darius Just
> That would be the only way he could kick my ass.
If that is the case, then he has indeed kicked your ass in every
discussion -- because each and every time, you've run away crying, rather
than stay and defend your idiotic assertions.
--- dj
Darius Just
> Darius Just wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tommy wrote:
>>
>>> Test User wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
>>>>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you as you see me..
>>>>>
>>>>> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
>>>>> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
>>>>> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
>>>>> beings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
>>>> this way?
>>>
>>> Just assumed she's keeping Kosher.
>>
>> Why?
>
> She is, after all 'one of, 'those people'
Why do you assume that Ms. Salzman is keeping kosher, idiot dickless
pigshit?
...
>>> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
>>> opened? Hmmmm?
>>
>> Which Jews hold that view, idiot dickless pigshit?
>>
>
> All of those that keep Kosher.
You don't know the answer. I'll ask again, so you can show us your
ignorance again:
Which Jews hold that a non-Jew cannot touch a bottle of wine after it has
been opened, idiot dickless pigshit?
--- dj
Test User
> Test User wrote:
>
> > "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> P.S.
> >>
> >> I see you as you see me..
> >>
> >> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
> >>
> >> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
> >> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
> >> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
> >> beings.
> >
> >
> > And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
> > this way?
>
Which has nothing to do with the crap you have posted. Do you think that
what you posted has any relation to what Jews actually think?
Do you actually *believe* that Jews are not permitted to consider non-Jews
as human?
> > Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't
> > bother to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
> >
> > http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
> >
>
> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
> opened? Hmmmm?
Of course they can. It's just that in a Kosher context, this will remove
the ritual purity of the wine.
You are referring to an issue of ritual purity and consecration that you do
not understand, and haven't given the slightest thought to. If you were
able to think for yourself, you would see why this is done.
Wine is used as an offering to God, and what is offered to God is not to
have been previously offered to another god or idol.
At the time of the creation of these customs (and in fact it still happens)
wine and foods were commonly offered or dedicated to other deities (at the
time, Christianity and Islam had not crushed the worship of other deities).
There are all kinds of complaints in the Old Testament from prophets
regarding the tendency of the Jews to engage in other forms of worship - the
Christmas tree is one survival of this.
So, to prevent the ritual contamination of what is offered to God, the
duties of handling wine and other offerings falls only to those who are
known, and know *how*, to keep the rules.
This is exactly the same concept as requiring that people who handle
classified documents have security clearances. It's the one way to be sure
that the materials will be handled with a specific type of respect.
Do you think that people who have security clearances regard people without
them as other than human?
Apparently, you are just too young to think for yourself. Do you think
you will ever grow up?
-pk
Test User
news:Pine.NEB.4.61.05...@otaku.freeshell.org...
It applies only in a Kosher context.
http://www.abarbanel.com/history.shtml
"Wine served at large functions invariably is Mevushal, as it retains its
Kashrut quality even when the bottle is opened by gentile waiters and passed
around the table at a mixed gathering."
HTH
-pk
Kenneth McVay OBC
Test User <te...@dev.null> wrote:
[Ignorant, bigoted child flushed down the tommy]
>Apparently, you are just too young to think for yourself. Do you think
>you will ever grow up?
The ignorant brat is just to stupid to think for himself. That is why
he is not worth any of your time or attention.
--
"...I note that on the few occasions of which I am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been singularly unsuccessful..."
(http://www.vex.net/~nizkor/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/reason.html)
Test User
> Test User wrote:
>
> And you think you're worth me response? Wishful thinking on your part.
Can't address the issues you raise yourself, apparently.
So why do you think that what you posted reflects what Jews think?
> Get lost.
>
> P.S.
> Count yourself lucky that you got this.
Normally, you'd have just run away from your words, yes. But why would I
consider myself lucky?
-pk
Darius Just
> And you think you're worth me response?
You are incapable of a response, dickless pigshit. That's why, once again,
you have decided to run away.
--- dj
William Daffer
[snip]
>>> So what, What are you going to do about it wigger?
>>
>> "Wigger."
>>
>> The little child Tommy has finally graduated to the most vile and
>> nauseating level possible.
>
> He's wigger...Go look at his post in alt.non.racism
Congratulations Tommy! Your brain removal operation was a complete
success! You've turned yourself into fine cannon fodder for your
Nazi overlords!
[snip]
whd
--
<quote>
xganon, in 360dc87da7c02e27...@xganon.com, under the subject line:
"The Horror of the gas chambers", says:
It's too bad that they still don't do that. I would love to see most
of the oppressive Zion nazi regime and the rest of the Jew assasins
put there. For every non jew killed 100 jews should be slaughtered
like pigs. They don't belong there, the temples should be burned and
the people shot. They are all soldiers of zion and deserve one fate.
They are the chosen to die people. God has chosen the jews to be
persecuted and slaughtered. IT IS THE WAY
</quote>
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> P.S.
>
> I see you as you see me..
>
> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>
> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.
Thanks for running away, little baby.
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Test User wrote:
>
> > "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> > news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >> P.S.
> >>
> >> I see you as you see me..
> >>
> >> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
> >>
> >> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
> >> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
> >> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
> >> beings.
> >
> >
> > And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
> > this way?
>
> Just assumed she's keeping Kosher.
>
Yep. ASSuming sure makes you an ASS, doesn't it?
> > Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't
> > bother to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
> >
> > http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
> >
>
> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
> opened? Hmmmm?
>
Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury when you grow up, little boy?
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Darius Just wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Tommy wrote:
> >
> >> Test User wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Tommy" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:1144883.p3CyDmHuVm@FreeBSD...
> >>>> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> P.S.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see you as you see me..
> >>>>
> >>>> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
> >>>>
> >>>> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
> >>>> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
> >>>> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
> >>>> beings.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
> >>> this way?
> >>
> >> Just assumed she's keeping Kosher.
> >
> > Why?
>
> She is, after all 'one of, 'those people'
Which people, little boy? Do you have any idea what "Conservative" or
"reform" mean? Do you really think that all Jews all keep kosher?
My goodness! You're an even bigger moron than I thought, little child.
>
> >>> Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't
> >>> bother to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
> >>>
> >>> http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
> >>>
> >>
> >> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
> >> opened? Hmmmm?
> >
> > Which Jews hold that view, idiot dickless pigshit?
> >
>
> All of those that keep Kosher.
>
> Hell, you've been kissing Jew as for years. It would be nice of them to
> reward you for your traitorous deeds with a party - If they ever did throw
> you a party, and wine is poured be sure not to touch the bottle after it's
> been opened. If you happend to do so, they would throw it out. After all
> the goyim is unclean.
Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little baby?
Sara Salzman
wrote:
> Indeed we are.
>
> > And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
> > admitted liar and death-faker) that I wrote any of those?
> >
>
> You admitted to it. As you told me: That post was made over ten years ago,
> and the only complaint was the Bradbury changed the date of the post.
I sure did tell you that post was made over ten years ago. Now where in
that statement do I "admit" anything???
>
> As Scott would say: Care to deny that you made that post? Do you kiss your
> daddy with that mouth Sara?
>
> http://tinyurl.com/5dyet
Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
Kenneth McVay OBC
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[ignorant child flushed straight down the tommikins]
>Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
Whatever became of Fatbury Scumbag, anyway?
Darius Just
...
> Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little baby?
Believe it or not, being Scott Bradbury would be a step up the
evolutionary ladder for pigshit. An exceptionally small step, but still...
--- dj
Sara Salzman
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
> In article <catamont-47DF5B...@news.giganews.com>,
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> [ignorant child flushed straight down the tommikins]
>
> >Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
>
> Whatever became of Fatbury Scumbag, anyway?
Oh, he's still polluting that town in Texas that everyone knows but
we're not allowed to say.
steve wolk
"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
news:10u6e5p...@corp.supernews.com...
> In article <catamont-47DF5B...@news.giganews.com>,
> Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> [ignorant child flushed straight down the tommikins]
>
>>Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
>
> Whatever became of Fatbury Scumbag, anyway?
When someone is as morbidly obese as Fatbury, they can go just like that.
There will be no voluntary pallbearers, just a driver for the 18 wheeler.
The cemetary plot is the Texas panhandle.
Allan Matthews
says...
Besides, by his own admission Bradbury died years ago.
allan
--
=========================================
"I am a 'Nazi'"
- "Sieg Heil" Scottie Bradbury
=========================================
http://www.allan.matthews.name
Joe Bruno
Allan Matthews wrote:
> In article <Hb2dnRJjvd5...@comcast.com>, Bar...@Seville.com
> says...
> >
> > "Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
> > news:10u6e5p...@corp.supernews.com...
> > > In article <catamont-47DF5B...@news.giganews.com>,
> > > Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > [ignorant child flushed straight down the tommikins]
> > >
> > >>Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
> > >
> > > Whatever became of Fatbury Scumbag, anyway?
> >
> >
> >
> > When someone is as morbidly obese as Fatbury, they can go just like
that.
> > There will be no voluntary pallbearers, just a driver for the 18
wheeler.
> > The cemetary plot is the Texas panhandle.
>
> Besides, by his own admission Bradbury died years ago.
>
>
He was brain dead years before that happened, too.
Joe Bruno
Tommyrot must be drinking gallons of the stuff. Either that, or he
smokes wacky tabacky.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <1399201.Wv2jNBreAV@FreeBSD>:
>Roger A. Felts wrote:
>> In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote
>> in message <64ZLMZDN3836...@reece.net.au>:
>>>All entries below collated from various sources and are
>>>public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
>>>purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
>> Published at least once a month, by the pathetic ignorant hypocritical
>> lying little babychild's comrades and despite zir lies to the
>> contrary, a unique low in net.thuggery.
>I don't know who posted that, nor do I care.
You care enough to lie about it, babychild.
>> Care to try and document any similar posting being made even *once*
>> with the names, addresses and phone numbers not only of posters on the
>> denier side, but their co-workers and parents who have never even
>> posted to Usenet, and with a callous disregard for the privacy of
>> those people whose information is inaccurately reported as be
>> associated with someone who has pissed off your degenerate friends?
>So what, What are you going to do about it wigger?
And so the pathetic ignorant lying little child's pious whines about
not supporting the posting of personal information is once again shown
to be utter crap.
Your mother must be *so* proud of you.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <10u6e5p...@corp.supernews.com>:
>[ignorant child flushed straight down the tommikins]
>>Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
>Whatever became of Fatbury Scumbag, anyway?
Still running from zir fraudulent $10k "Challenge>"
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message <1981574.eqziLqFNEm@FreeBSD>:
>Test User wrote:
>And you think you're worth me response? Wishful thinking on your part.
>
>Get lost.
>
>P.S.
>Count yourself lucky that you got this.
Run away, pathetic ignorant lying little baby child, run away.
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Darius Just wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, dickless tommy pigshit wrote:
>>> Sara Salzman wrote:
>> ...
>>>> The little child Tommy has finally graduated to the most vile and
>>>> nauseating level possible.
>>> He's wigger.
>> Translation: you know that Roger is going to kick your pathetic lying ass
>> in any discussion on any topic -- so, being the submoronic coward that you
>> are, you fling what you think is an epithet and run away crying.
>That would be the only way he could kick my ass.
Well that, and a discussion about Prussian Blue, and a discussion
about the Moon landings and a discussion about the Talmud and a
discussion about the FBI's Boston field office and a discussion about
computer fundamentals and a discussion of the L.C. 'bot and a
discussion about my children and their schooling and a discussion
about stalking and a discussion about ...
Well, you get the idea.
Run away, baby -- or throw another tantrum so your daddy can be *real*
proud of you...
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>Sara Salzman wrote:
>P.S.
>
>I see you as you see me..
>
>Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>
>Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
>manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
>beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human beings.
Of course, the pathetic ignorant ling little baby cannot even tell us
what the Midrasch Talpioth *is*, let alone offer a proper citation.
But that won't stop the babyliar from popping off about it anyway.
When are you going to get around to posting that URL on Nizkor where
one can see pictures of soap?
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
>>>>> P.S.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see you as you see me..
>>>>>
>>>>> Midrasch Talpioth, p. 225-L
>>>>>
>>>>> Everything a Jew needs for his church ritual no goy is permitted to
>>>>> manufacture, but only a Jew, because this must be manufactured by human
>>>>> beings and the Jew is not permitted to consider the goyim as human
>>>>> beings.
>>>> And what makes you think that this is how Sara or anyone else sees you
>>>> this way?
>>> Just assumed she's keeping Kosher.
>> Why?
>She is, after all 'one of, 'those people'
LOL -- why would keeping Kosher require such a view, pathetic ignorant
lying little babychild?
>>>> Apparently, you've just swallowed some more antisemitica. You don't
>>>> bother to check anything at all, do you, sucker?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.frum.org/talmud/index3.asp
>>> Tell us why a non-jew (Goyim) Can't touch a bottle of Wine after its been
>>> opened? Hmmmm?
Tell us why a random church member isn't allowed to sere communion?
>> Which Jews hold that view, idiot dickless pigshit?
>All of those that keep Kosher.
Wrong.
You never tire of being shown to be an ignorant little hater, do you?
Your father must be spinning in his grave...
>Hell, you've been kissing Jew as for years. It would be nice of them to
>reward you for your traitorous deeds with a party - If they ever did throw
>you a party, and wine is poured be sure not to touch the bottle after it's
>been opened. If you happend to do so, they would throw it out. After all
>the goyim is unclean.
Well, *you* may be, but the rest of us shower regularly.
Joe Rosenburg
<thra...@reece.net.au> wrote:
>All entries below collated from various sources and are
>public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
>purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
>
>Matthew Ackerman
>132 N The Orch
>Hightstown, NJ
>609-443-3579
>
>Alien (See Ralf Peter Loserth)
>
>Howard J Aubrey (Madayn67)
>2105 Iris PL
>Bethlehem,PA 18018
>610-691-3197
>
>Jeffrey G. Brown (Darius Just)
>8357 SUMMITRIDGE
>CINCINNATI OH 45255
>alph...@GEEKMAN.COM>
>Tel: 513-474-1953
>Fax: 513-474-9678
>Wife: Susan Brown
>
>Lynn Kenneth Circle
>6026 Portal Dr
>Houston, TX 77096
>713-726-9327
>
>Susan Cohen
>710 Burnt Mills Ave
>Silver Spring, MD 20901
>301-681-9193
>
>WILLIAM H DAFFER
>112 CHARLES ST
>ANNAPOLIS, MD 21401
>
>WARNING: The below person is very dangerous and
>unstable and has a prior criminal record.
>
>YALE F EDEIKEN
>918 N BAYARD ST
>ALLENTOWN PA 18104
>1-610-435-9820
>Bankruptcies
>Court Location: PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN - READING
>Case Number: 9722394
>Date Filed: 06/02/1997
>Discharge Date: 10/17/1997
>Debtor Name: EDEIKEN YALE F
>Address: 918 BAYARD ST, ALLENTOWN, PA 18104-3759
>
>David Gorski (ORAC)
>Cancer Institute of New Jersey
>195 Little Albany St
>New Brunswick NJ
>08901-1977
>
>Another address for David Gorski
>
>David Gorski
>53 W Jackson Blvd
>Chicago, IL 60604-3606
>1-312-427-1610
>
>Patrick J Groff
>5152 College Gardens Ct
>San Diego, CA 92115
>1-619-582-1603
>
>CHARLES D HALL
>2698 20-A 8 AVE 20-A
>NEW YORK, NY 10030
>
>Patricia F. Heil
>15688 Bloomfield Dr
>Woodbridge, VA 22193-5705
>703-730-1922
>
>Steven Horn (KCOM)
>1836 NW 11th St
>Oklahoma City, OK 73106
>(405) 524-0576
>
>Patrick Lee Humphrey
>7500 Bellerive #1807
>Houston, Texas 77036-3040
>1-713-266-7764
>Married to an excessively obese homely skank named Dale.
>http://www.io.com/~patrick/vegas.html
>
>Ron Jacobson
>6 Auburn Ct
>Brookline, MA 02446-6331
>617-734-5569
>
>Darius Just (See Jeffrey G. Brown)
>
>KCOM (See Steve Horn)
>
>Patrick Keenan
>501 Clinton
>Toronto, ON M6G2Z3
>(416) 534 - 9707
>
>Daniel Keren
>1930 E 17th St
>Brooklyn, NY 11229-3408
>1-718-375-6419
>
>PAUL P KNEISEL (TALLPAUL)
>1332 RIVERSIDE DR UNIT 54
>NEW YORK, NY 10033
>
>PAUL P KNEISEL (PO815) tall...@NYCT.NET
>anti-fascism.org
>200 East Tenth Street #603
>New York,, NY 10003
>212-568-6690
>->Anti-fascism.org's phone is in the name of Joel B. Mora<-
>JOEL B MORA
>92 WADSWORTH AVE UNIT 11
>NEW YORK, NY 10033
>
>CHRIS C LARSON
>8691 106TH AVE SE OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-3141
>PO BOX 263 OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-3141
>8691 106TH AVE SE OAKES ND 58474 (701) 742-2147
>
>Ken Lewis
>602 Elm Street Apt. 5
>Quesnel, BC V2J3X1
>(250) 747 - 1121
>Picture: http://www.einsatzgruppenarchives.com/ken/ken2.jpg
>
>RALF PETER LOSERTH (Alien)
>19519 AZURE OAK
>SAN ANTONIO, TX 78258
>
>ANDREW E MATHIS
>760 N 41 St
>Philadelphia, PA 19104
>215-243-0641
>
>work
>Andrew E. Mathis
>Dept. of English
>Villanova University
>Villanova, PA 19085
>215-893-1759
>and...@mathis.net
>
>Allan Matthews
>64 Margaret St
>Arlington, MA 02474
>781-646-5281
>
>Gord McFee
>609 Noble Cresc
>Ottawa Ontario K1V 7J1
>613-731-1150
>
>Gord McFee's supervisor:
>The Honourable Jane Stewart
>Minister of Human Resources Development
>140 Promenade du Portage
>Phase IV, 14th floor
>Hull, Quebec K1A 0J9
>
>She may be e-mailed directly at:
>min.hr...@hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
>
>Enquiries may be directed to her press secretary:
>Anna Kapiniari
>Press Secretary
>Minister of Human Resources Development
>(819) 994-0325
>www.hrdc-drhc.gc.ca
>
>Complaints about Mr McFee should be directed to his more immediate
>superior, Claire Morris:
>Deputy Minister and Chairperson
>Ms Claire Morris
>Human Resources Development Canada
>140 Promenade du Portage
>Place du Portage, Phase IV
>Hull, Quebec K1A 0J9
>
>Ken McVay
>home
>995 Bowen Road, Apt. 3108
>Nanaimo, British Columbia V9R 2A4, Canada.
>1-250-616-9431
>
>work
>Ken McVay Consulting Group
>P.O. Box 244, Station A
>Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
>1-250-616-9431
>
>John Morris
>Department of English
>University of Alberta
>3-5 Humanities Centre
>Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E5
>Tel.(780) 492-3258
>Fax: (780) 492-8142
>
>(If John is not in the department, his supervisor is
>Dr Stephen R Reimer, who you can email at
>stephen...@ualberta.ca.
>Dr Reimer can also be contacted at:
>11772 - 37 Ave NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6J 0J4,
>tel.(780) 434-7497.)
>
>Our only token negroid who is the poster boy
>for affirmative action and for being one stupid
>big buck negroid.
> CHRISTOPHER C MORTON
> 419 MAIKE PL APT A
> FREMONT OH 43420
> 1-419-355-9071
>
>http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/hilary.gif
>Hilary Ostrov
>38 Leopold Place Unit 702
>New Westminster, BC
>V3L 2C6
>604-525-3055
> Sexually frustrated woman inflicted with _kraurosis
>vulvae_ which drives her inner bitch. She is too stupid to
>know they have ointments available for her affliction.
>Try some Vagisil as a lubricant instead of KY Jelly the next
>time you do your dildo workout Hilary.
>
>Michael Ragland
>18252 Old Triangle Road
>Triangle VA 22172
>Tel 703 361 5256
>
>Orac: See David Gorski
>
>Roger@ . Is suspected nym of Yale Edeiken
>
>Joel (and Felicia) Rosenberg
>3925 15TH AVE S
>Minneapolis
>MN 55407
>Tel 612 822 2415
>
>Jeffrey E. Salzberg
>2051 9th St.
>Sarasota, FL 34237-3401
>(941) 365-5221
>
>Sara Salzman
>4015 S Killarney Way
>Aurora, CO 80013
>United States
>Tel 303 617 9412
>
>Sara Salzman's father
>LEON B SALZMAN
>4550 N PARK AVE
>CHEVY CHASE MD 20815
>(301) 657-1137
>
>Marvin A Sebourn (OSUGEOGRAPHY)
>2802 Haystack Ln
>Enid, OK 73703-1658
>580-237-5258
>osugeo...@aol.com
>Oklahoma State University; Department of Geography
>http://www.geog.okstate.edu/students/students.htm
>Marvin Sebourn, B.S., Oklahoma State University, Research Assistant
> Marvin's supervisor:
>Office of the Vice President for Research and Technology
>203 Whitehurst, Stillwater, OK 74078-1020
>(405) 744-6501 (ph)
>(405) 744-6244 (fax) v...@okstate.edu
> http://www.okstate.edu/
>Oklahoma State University, Stillwater OK 74078 | 405 744-5000
>President of OSU: DAVID J. SCHMIDLY
>
>Laurence B. Shiff (Nazihunter)
>(Residence)
>Dr Laurence B. Shiff
>327 Cortleigh Boulevard
>Toronto, Ontario M5N 1R2 CA
>Tel: 416-785-4574
>
>(Office)
>KASPU COM
>2788 Bathurst St.
>Toronto, Ontario m6b3a3 CA
>Tel: 416-789-5691
>(FAX) 416-789-5691
>E-Mail: sh...@kaspu.com
>
>ARTHUR J TANDY (Joebruno, Bruno, Black Knight, Sailor57)
>1737 HOLLISTER ST #14
>SAN DIEGO CA 92154
>(619) 423-2950
>
>Steven T Wolk
>6037 Loganwood Dr
>Rockville, MD 20852-3459
>301-230-2151
>
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
in message
<1105807484.333527c3740f478bce307cf01f282be2@teranews>:
Gee, look -- there it is again. And you *still* haven't produced even
*one* instance of such a post listing denier's information (and that
of their neighbors and co-workers who have never posted to Usenet.)
But then, everyone knew you were lying when you tried to claim that
this happens on both sides.
Is your mommie *terribly* proud of you that you lie so lamely to
justify your irrational hate?
Doc Tavish
<catamont-AF4706...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
>admitted liar...
Care to show where I ever made such an admission? YOU ARE THE LIAR AS WELL AS
YOU ARE A PERJURER!! Now count all of the lies I have caught you and your fellow
offspring of the father of lies in!
Yale lied about being his own attorney FIRST to try to cover up the fact that he
had issued a subpoena to my ISP to get my address and SECOND so he could lie to
the court and claim that I never responded to his complaints which he falsely
claimed he had served!
Proof Yale lied about being his own attorney and proof he lied about subpoenaing
my identity, address, and telephone number which he abused to post death threats
with my name, address, and telephone number attached:
Xref:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/5e432c4a6945e49b?dmode=source
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40mon...
(Archived locally as: YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies and YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.22...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnapg0...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
[...]
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH
THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to
incite criminal harassment.
[...]
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
[...]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIE NUMBER 1 EXPOSED:
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH
THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to
incite criminal harassment.
<end>
All court documents list you and you alone as yo being your own attorney- s0o
you are a liar!
I.E.
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Who is listed as counsel for Yale F. Edeiken? Answer: Yale F. Edeiken!
========================================================================
LIE NUMBER 2 EXPOSED:
(Note I already proved Yale was his own attorney just above and he lied about
being his own attorney!)
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
<end>
Yale denied doing so UNTIL I got my ISP to FWD me his subpoena which I posted
and then he changed his tune BUT the above proves he lied!
The subpoena which does not show on the docket (which means it was not
registered with the court) and it went directly to Yale's residence where he
distributed the info on it after making his death threat posts!
I.E.
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonny...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonny...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104] <(Which is Yale's home address!!!)
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt Documenting Two Lies Told by Yale F. Edeiken~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=9i9740t3teigg6ghb...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me V1.1 S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2...@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:
ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place!
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!
Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
"July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
"July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
<<Tavish comment January 24, 2005: Yale F. Edeiken being his own attorney lied
to a civil court about serving those complaints! Seeing how he was his own
attorney and seeing how he is a liar who has been before the Disciplinary Board
of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania three times it is easy to understand how
the shyster would think he could get away with such legal system abuse! See the
attachment further down documenting Yale before the Disciplinary Board!>>
"August 25, 2000: PRAE TO ENTER JDGT AFGAINST DFT SCOTT BRADBURY AKA DOC
TAVISH FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND. JDGT ENTERED VS/SAID DFT IN AN AMT TO BE
ASSESSEED. IMPORTANT NOTICE, AFDT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. NOTICE MLD
8/25/2000 FILED @ 9:28 AM."
I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on me by a Sheriff's Deputy nor on my attorney who is on record with
the court as stating:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
________________________________________________________________________________
Key statement from above: "Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the
defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections..." IOW I was
denied my day in court and due process by a liar and a person who manufactures
evidence to make false accusations in a civil court of law!
~~The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked~~
For a fact Yale F. Edeiken had not served his "complaints" on neither my
attorney NOR myself. This was submitted to a civil court of law:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A." Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable
to attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was
opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted Daylin B. Leach Esquire <END>
My foes steadfastly claim I personally had received the complaints and then did
a "Return To Stalker" and returned the complaints to Yale F. Edeiken unopened:
"You had NO lawyer at the time the complaints were served --
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: If I "had no lawyer at the time
the complaints were served" then why did Yale F. Edeiken issue a
subpoena on him six days before those complaints were allegedly served
as the Docket Printout proves?>>
and in your ineffable stupidity, you *bragged* about sending the complaints back
unopened after scrawling "Return to Stalker" on them. That's engraved in the
court record. I suggest you tell *them* they're lying."
From: Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Date: 15 Mar 2004 06:09:21 -0600
Message-ID: <szksmga...@fnord.io.com>
<start/quote>
>Also I was NEVER served with the lawsuit's "complaints" against me! (Neither
>myself NOR my attorney ever got copies of the complaints filed against me by
>Yale F. Edeiken the plaintiff.) How could I have possibly answered the accusations
>when I was never served with them?
You're referring to the ones you returned marked "return to stalker"?
<end/quote>
From: "Patrick Keenan" <te...@dev.null>
Message-ID: <p71Tb.8319$qU3.7...@news20.bellglobal.com>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 01:36:05 -0500
"He refused to address the complaint in the first place. Everything that Yale
(as attorney) sent to Bradbury in reference to the case, Bradbury returned
unopened with the statement "Return to Stalker" on it."
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Date: 28 Aug 2003 17:33:07 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-E9F2E3...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
I now ask a simple question- IF I HAD DONE SUCH AS THE ABOVE LIARS CLAIM THEN
WHY DIDN'T YALE F EDEIKEN PRESENT THE COMPLAINTS TO THE JUDGE ALLEGEDLY RETURNED
AS "RETURN TO STALKER" AND UNOPENED? It sure would have ruined the Petition for
Relief From Judgment and would have made my attorney a laughing stock for
submitting to the court: "Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the
defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if
the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." ANSWER AS TO WHY-- IT
DIDN'T HAPPEN!! I did not receive the complaints to return them unopened!!!
YALE F EDEIKEN IS A LIAR AS WELL AS ALL THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT HIM!
NEW ADDITION:
Yale never complained that I sent back his trumped up complaints unopened and he
would be the one to know if I had actually done so!!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8dEU6.90336%24gA.2250804%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=5
(Archived locally as: YaleServedNot_1 and YaleServedNot_2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Question For Yale "Phuk Phace" Edeiken... (Also
Representation of the Spirit of Edeiken) Corrected Version
Message-ID: <8dEU6.90336$gA.22...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:12:20 GMT
Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]
<REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TA...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL-
CAPS-TAVISHISKIS> wrote in message news:8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-_-$@news.noc.cabal.int...
> If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000
You did not. You have a copy of the docket.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: If that is so then why does the docket show
you issuing a subpoena on my attorney on July 14, 2000 in regards to Edeiken Vs
Bradbury 1999-C-2786!? I show the docket printout above too! See how easy it is
to catch Yale lying?>>
Why are you afraid to print the date when your attorney entered his
appearance.
Why did you claim in court that you had no attorney representing you
until AFTER the default was filed.
>How could he do anything with the lawsuit not even knowing the accusations?
At no time did Daylin Leach request a copy of the Complaint.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: That is an outright lie and the Petition for
Relief from Judgment (which is on file at the courthouse) plainly stated:
"PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT - COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by
and through his counsel Daylin B. Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable
court for Relief from Judgment, pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this
petition, the defendant avers the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A." Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a). "[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta
against the defendant... When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the
complaint when he first becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via
e-mail." Another Edeiken lie exposed!!>>
A copy was served upon you as required by law. If you threw it out or
otherwise failed to contact an attorney you thought was representing you,
that is YOUR problem.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: IOW you are stating as of June 10, 2001 AFTER
your kook lawsuit against me was DISMISSED that I had not returned your
perjurious complaints back to you unopened which exposes your fellow filth as
big mouthed liars!! Thanks a lot for the clarification Fatboy Edeiken!!>>
Finally, in a verified pleading in September, you claimed that no
Complaint had been filed or served.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: TRUE!!!>>
Why did you commit perjury?
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: YOU WERE THE ONE WHO COMMITTED PERJURY!!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT >>
Also see:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/86833ad4e347be73?dmode=source
Subject: My New Sig Line Which Can't be Refuted! Just Count the Lies Made Over
the Years Which are Now Exposed!
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:46:51 -0500
Message-ID: <gh6rn0pirv5dlpps3...@4ax.com>
More of lies Yale F. Edeiken is caught in about me not having an attorney prior
to August 25, 2000 and the lies he told the court against me:
Xref:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e0af4e095678b3fe?dmode=source
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Esq Contacting Me Against Disciplinary Rules and More
of His Lies Exposed for Posterity
Message-ID: <i9ccb09nk0n01ao5l...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=%25vDt5.5816%24V67.297087%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=2
(Archived locally as: YFEmoreLies)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,sci.skeptic
Subject: Tje Case Against Bradbury
Message-ID: <%vDt5.5816$V67.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 02:59:07 GMT
In Pennsylvania the defendant has twenty days after a complaint is filed to
notify the court that he will defend an action. I served the notice if
default on Bradbury on August 14, 2000, 25 days after he was served with the
complaint.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: For a fact I was NEVER served the complaints NOR
was my attorney NOR were neither my attorney NOR I given any notice to defend
against the complaints which were never served! Lie #1 exposed>>
The court gas already sent Bradbury notice that a default judgment has been
entered against him and that he has lost the case. That notice gas already
been mailed in an envelop which I provided. This means that it has my
return address and a stamp (celebrating Chanukah) on it. Bradbury has
already sent the court's notice back to me with his usual insults scrawled
on it.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: Another lie. A civil court uses it's own
envelopes etc. to send any official business and any competent attorney would
see how you are lying! Lie #2 exposed>>
CAN BRADBURY ASK TO HAVE THIS JUDGMENT OPENED?
Yes. He can file a motion to open the judgment and have his defenses filed
"nunc pro tunc." This is discretionary with the court.
WILL A COURT DO THIS?
Not likely. To convince a court to do this Bradbury must present a
"reasonable explanation" for his failure to file his answer.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: The court did in fact open it and upon the basis
of my request for release under the judgment (shown just below for the record)
you got against me through unethical means the lawsuit against me was DISMISSED
as well as any claims of damages you claimed!! Lie #3 exposed>>
IS THE INCOMPETENCE OF HIS LAWYER A "REASONABLE EXPLANATION"?
Nope. Incompetence of his lawyer - or even deliberate inaction - can be
used only in a criminal matter. This is a civil case where, unlike the
state, I have no obligation to make sure his attorney can find the
courthouse without a map. The sole exception would be if he could produce
clear and convincing (i.e. beyond a reasonable doubt) evidence that I and
his attorney conspired to deprive Bradbury of his right to defend himself.
Unless he that type of evidence, his proper recourse is an action against
his attorney for legal malpractice.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: Incompetence of my attorney? He had your
frivolous lawsuit and all claims of damages against me DISMISSED and is now a
successful State Representative in Pennsylvanian State whereas you are a loser
and you even lost your appeal and you have been brought before the Disciplinary
Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania three times for being an unethical
shyster! Proof offered further down! I just exposed more of your lies and
smears!>>
WHAT IS THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THIS JUDGMENT?
Bradbury has admitted all allegations of fact in the complaint and to his
liability;
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: MORE LIES!!>>
Further he has not admitted to the jurisdiction of the court
although he has admitted to all facts which I claim establish such
jurisdiction.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: MORE LIES!!>>
CAN I BE SUED IF I CALL BRADBURY A FORGER BASED ON THIS DEFAULT?
No. As I told you, he has legally admitted tthe facts in the complaint.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: Why would I admit to complaints which neither I
NOR my attorney ever saw? Another lie exposed!!>>
CAN OTHERS SUE HIM BASED ON THE ADMISSION HE MADE HERE ABOUT HARASSING ME?
Certainly. And he cannot contest factual allegations if they are part of
the complaint in this case or are established at the hearing.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: I would love for one of your fellow nut cases to
sue me on the basis of your perjured complaints! I would be able to kill two
gooney birds with one stone! He would get slam dunked based on submitting
perjured statements and it would all go back to you!!>>
CAN YOU CALL BRADBURY AS A WITNESS?
Yes, but why bother? He has already admitted everything that I have said
about him.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: Still more lies! Why would I ever admit that your
fabrications are true!? You are a nut case and that is why you lost your kook
lawsuit against me!>>
CAN BRADBURY APPEAL THE COURT'S DECISION ABOUT DAMAGES?
Eventually. His first step must be to file post-trial motions for no
appellate court will accept an appeal unless the trial court has had an
opportunity to correct its errors, if any. This also serves to define the
issues for appeal as an appellee cannot present an issue on appeal that has
not been raised at the trial court level. If Bradbury makes it this far let
us devoutly pray that he does appeal. The Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate
Procedure has a "deadbeat" rule. If Bradbury appeals he is required to post
the ENTIRE amount of the judgment against him and interest on it to be paid
if he loses the appeal.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: More B.S. from Yale who lost his lawsuit and who
lost HIS appeal!!>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant. The court has
heard telephone messages left on the defendant's answering machine, in which
the plaintiff admits dedicating himself to making the defendant's life a "living
hell." He refers to the defendant as a "miserable piece of shit" among other
charming epithets... Even after the defendant is represented by counsel, mail is
still sent directly to the defendant addressed to "Defendant Bradbury." ...When
attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain
English, this is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a
man he has never met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The key statements above were: "Since a complaint has never been filed or
served, the defendant is unable to attach a copy of preliminary objections he
would file if the judgment was opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a)." AND
"When attorney Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first
becomes involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail." IOW I was not
given my right to due process by Edeiken to defend myself from his numerous
documented perjurious accusations and some are detailed here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7n...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7n...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Looks like the court ruled in my favor to me! Yale even lost his appeal as well!
Looks like I was victorious twice!
<START>
September 26, 2001
Yale F. Edeiken
918 N Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104-3759
RE: Yale F. Edeiken, Appellant v. Scott Bradbury et al
1714 EDA 2001
Dear Mr. Edeiken:
This is to advise that the attached Order has been entered in the
above- captioned matters.
A Certified Copy of this Order together with the record will be
sent to the Prothonotary of Lehigh County in due course.
Very truly yours,
(Signed)
David A. Szewczak
Prothonotary
DAS/dag
Attachment
CC: Daylin B. Leach, Esquire
Scott Bradbury
Honorable Edward D. Reibman
The Attachment:
<Start>
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Eastern District Office
Yale F. Edeiken APPELLANT No. 1714 EDA 2001
V.
Scott Bradbury Et Al C.P. Civil Lehigh County
99-C-2786
ORDER
AND NOW, this 26th day of September, 2001, the within
appeal is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief."
PER CURIAM
<STOP>
The prudent question to why Yale failed to file his brief is answered in this
archive which shows his motive for legal system abuse and how serious he was NOT
in litigating me!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsqh1s%404ax.com&rnum=6&filter=0
Subject: Why Yale F. Edeiken LOST His Appeal..
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:30:59 -0600
Message-ID: <sq4v2us0odig5nhq79f6crk7a2e7lsq...@4ax.com>
Yale proving he ignored the e-mail exchange of May 29, 2000 with my attorney
concerning Yale not making any further contact with me:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=B1Iq5.2901%24V67.112066%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=3
(Archived locally as: YFEmoreLies2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Attn Pat Blakely - Please Read and Send Reply if One is Made by The
Liar and Miscreant
Message-ID: <B1Iq5.2901$V67.112...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 05:40:49 GMT
[...]
Gurther the arrorney who contacted me in your name was asked directly
whether he represented you in this matter. He denied such representation;
in fact, he did not even know your name referring to you as "Bradberry."
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: My attorney did advise you May 29, 2000 that I
was his client and for you to no longer make any contact with me. The fact he
misspelled my name does not negate the fact and further down I prove that you
are now caught lying about the May 29, 2000 e-mailing between my attorney and
YOU!!>>
> 2) He made a written agreement via e-mail to my attorney dated
> May 29, 2000 under "Disciplinary Rules" to not make any more direct
> contact with me. (My attorney sent me a printout of the e-mail dialogue
> and Yale's agreement.)
Dirst, thre is no such document as the "Disciplinary Rules."
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: If there are no Disciplinary Rules then why did
you, yourself, refer to them in the e-mail exchange of May 29, 2000 you are
trying to evade the contents of?>>
> 3) Sending me numerous snail mails AFTER making the above written
> agreement addressed to "Defendant Scott Bardbury".
Absolutely correct. In fact, I continually served you with papers
related to this action as required by R.C.P. 440, as cited above.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: You were in violation of the Disciplinary Rules
seeing how my attorney had sent you these precise words via e-mail which is on
file: "Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney. Please refrain
from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry." Notice Daylin Leach Esq did advise
you on May 29, 2000 in effect I was his client and he was my attorney and most
important: "the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having any direct contact
with my client as long as he has an attorney." which you flagrantly continued to
violate!!!>>
Frther, as ponted out above, there was no agreement not to send you such
mail.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: You were obliged by the Disciplinary Rules to
"refrain from having any contact" with me which you ignored!!>>
I claim that I have sent you the nrmal legal filings found in any civil
action; you claim the contents were otherwise. No sane person and,
especially, no sane lawyer (and you claim that was his advice) would send
"harassing" communications back uniopened and uncopied. At best, this would
create a situation whre it would be my word against yours.
<<Tavish comment May 27, 2004: My word against yours? You have been
proven time and time again to be a pathological liar who is unethical too!>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Now for Yale trying to remove himself from his legal obligation to no longer
make contact with me directly and many more lies exposed:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=m2lomv4fd4cj890nijgplm4c1ocke3j894%404ax.com&rnum=6
Subject: Edeikook Follies #5 Yale F. Edeiken Lied About Making a Written
Agreement with My Attorney to no Longer Make Direct Contact With Me R_0920
Message-ID: <m2lomv4fd4cj890nijgplm4c1ocke3j...@4ax.com>
[...]
> I have said before that I do have in my possession the hardcopy of
> the e-mailings between my attorney and Tubby Edeiken. I'd imagine that all
> of Tubby's snail mails I've FWD to my attorney will be presented to court
> within a day or so showing Tubby Edeiken agreeing to not make direct
> contact with me.
Read it again, Bradshit. It says nothing of the kind.
> From: Yale F. Edeiken <y...@enter.net>
> Message ID: <001501bfc9d5$2ddae340$d99c10cf!oemcomputer>
> To: Dyalibe...@aol.com
> References: <e8.5016260.26646...@aol.com
> Subject: Re: Edeiken v. Bradbury
> Date: Mon, May 29 2000 21:20:00 -0400
>
> [...]
>
> > Finally as you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having
> > any direct contact with my client as long as he has an attorney.
> > Please refrain from having any contact with Mr. Bradberry.
:
> If this confirms your representation I certainly will.
You will note that I make no such promise. I stated that I would IF
there wsa confirmation of such representation. Daylin Leach replied in the
negative. There wsa, therefore, no undertaking on my p[part.
<<Scott Bradbury comment July 23, 2001: My attorney referred to me as his
"client" which I would say pretty well says he's representing me! My attorney
also said: "the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having any direct contact
with my client as long as he has an attorney. Please refrain from having any
contact with Mr. Bradberry" but Yale kept sending US Parcel Post mailings
addressed to Defendant Scott Bradbury in large letters on the envelopes in order
to start rumors in my small town I'd imagine!>>
> If so I expect to hear an explanation of why you advised
> a client to defy a court order. As you well know that constitutes
> a flagrant violation of the disciplinary rules, Furter, should you
> actually be representing this creature, I expect a check for the
> sanctions already imposed to be forwarded to me immediately.
<<Scott Bradbury comment July 23, 2001: Notice that Yale F. Edeiken says exactly
as shown above: "As you well know that constitutes a flagrant violation of the
disciplinary rules" yet he told me numerous times (as even shown in the top of
this example!): " A lie. I stated that there are no "Disciplinary Rules" which
you continaully claimed exist." Now everyone should see why I call
Yale F. Edeiken Esq. a pathological liar! This attorney is a disgrace to the
legal profession!>>
Note that there was no response to this.
> Please God in the Heavens above let Yale deny publicly the authenticity
> of the above communication! I will be a very good boy too!
Why should I deny it. It proves you have been lying.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
BTW that "court order" Yale was claiming I defied was his complaint I did not
show up for a deposition which I did NOT agree to attend! IOW Yale lied to the
court again! What can one expect from an Officer of the Court who abuses his
position with the court to wage personal vendettas and violate numerous rules of
ethics! SIMPLY PUT-- YALE IS UNFIT TO BE AN ATTORNEY SEEING HOW HERE IS THE
LIAR'S TERRIBLE RECORD:
---Famous Last Words Series-- Yale F. Edeiken & Sara D. Salzman:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=3870...@news3.enter.net&lr=&hl=en
Archived locally as: YaleSuedTwice
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: KOOK WEBSITE
Date: 2000/01/02
Message-ID: <3870...@news3.enter.net>
"I have never been charged with any unethical activity relating to the
practice of law..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-564BD5.09581216092003%40netnews.attbi.com&rnum=2
(Archived locally as: SaraLibels2)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: PSYCHOSARA SALZMAN'S HOLIDAY SURPRISE ----
Message-ID: <catamont-564BD5...@netnews.attbi.com>
"Yale Edeiken has nothing to do with whether you're an impotent slug,
Mr. Bradbury... PROVE your idiotic assertion that he has been "censured"
by the state supreme court... Sara"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is laughing at you big time Yale F. Edeiken and Sara Salzman!
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
As for Yale F.Edeiken's lying statement: "I have never been charged with any
unethical activity relating to the practice of law..."; he was not only charged
three times but he received from the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court the following:
1) "Private Reprimand" in 1993
2) "Informal Admonition" in 1995
3) "PUBLIC CENSURE" in 1998
(RE: PUBLIFC CENSURE in 1998: The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F.
Edeiken a "private reprimand" but he continued to act like the psychotic nut
case he is and defied them and refused to appear at his hearing more than once!
He was then "forced" to appear and the "private reprimand" had escalated to
"PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest court of Pennsylvania State! Furthermore the
Disciplinary Board closed with: "It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F.
Edeiken] shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g),
PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the Disciplinary Board to "discipline him" AFTER
the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to
serve numerous notices upon him and compel him to attend his disciplinary
hearing!! Yale also had to pay for all costs of the investigation too! It's all
detailed in that PDF file!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale F. Edeiken was also charged AND convicted for assaulting a deputy sheriff
in the courthouse! All fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v...@4ax.com>
~~Shyster Yale F. Edeiken has been black listed by a watch group~~
Citizens for Legal Responsibility
Concerning unethical attorneys and judges in the State of Pennsylvania:
http://www.clr.org/pa.html (Archived locally as: clr-org_pa)
Judicial/Attorney Misconduct in Pennsylvania
Following are some of the attorneys or judges who have been reported to have
been disciplined by the State of Pennsylvania for unethical conduct, who may be
a resident of the State of Pennsylvania but was disciplined in another
jurisdiction, transferred to inactive status, sued for malpractice,
incarcerated, whom we understand have been charged with unethical conduct, have
engaged in conduct which tends to defeat the administration of justice, or to
bring the courts and the legal business into disrepute, etc.
[...]
Yale F. Edeiken --Attorney at Law - Supreme Court ID# 40290 (Allentown, PA)
<END>
Care to deny all of the above!?
>Sara
Tavish
~~Famous Last Words from Jail Bird Ken McVay~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=c1dhp...@enews4.newsguy.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: McVayCarThief_1 AND McVayCarThief_2)
From: "Ken McVay, OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org>
Newsgroups: edm.general,edm.politics,ab.general,can.taxes
Subject: Re: Bracegirdles Both Deserve Jail,Also Auditors-Crown Appeals
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:46:13 -0800
Organization: The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org
"Ken McVay, OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> did write:
>It seems Bill Grosvenor is still afraid to publish under his own name.
>That's because he has no evidence that I have ever been arrested, let alone
>convicted, of any crime,
Is that so? Did this Jewish web site lie when it reported this?
http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/Publications.asp?did=135&pid=21
(Link active February 11, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay)
Also: http://www.ajc.org/InTheMedia/PublicationsPrint.asp?did=135
(Link active February 23, 2004. Archived locally as JailbirdMcVay2)
The American Jewish Committee
"Hate and the Internet by Kenneth S. Stern
On-Line Approaches
"My whole agenda is to try and remove their market, as it were. They have an
agenda to sell. If, by demonstrating that they are lying about a specific issue,
I can remove a few hundred people from their potential market place, then I’ve
done them some harm." – Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father’s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail.... <END>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oooops looks like you have been caught lying again McVay! The "American Jewish
Committee" reported: "Ken McVay, Project Nizkor In 1956 Ken McVay stole his
father’s car and ran away from home. Apprehended, he spent his 16th birthday in
a Bellingham, Washington, jail" YET you stated above: "he has no evidence that I
have ever been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime"!
Isn't being "Apprehended" the same thing as being "arrested"?
WordNet 2.0 Vocabulary Helper: apprehended
The verb apprehend has 3 senses (first 2 from tagged texts)
1. (2) get the picture, comprehend, savvy, dig, grasp, compass, apprehend -- get
the meaning of something; ``Do you comprehend the meaning of this letter?''
2. (1) collar, nail, apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody;
``the police nabbed the suspected criminals'' )
3. apprehend, quail at -- (anticipate with dread or anxiety)
-----
Which sense of "apprehended" applies to you Ken McVay? ANSWER: "collar, nail,
apprehend, arrest, pick up, nab, cop -- (take into custody; ``the police
nabbed the suspected criminals'' )
YOU NOW HAVE A POLICE RECORD TOO KEN! Care to deny it Jail Bird McVay?
Here's laughing at you!! You did state: "he has no evidence that I have ever
been arrested, let alone convicted, of any crime.." BUT you were apprehended
or arrested for the crime of car theft and you were jailed! Once again you are
exposed as a liar! You weren't convicted because charges evidently weren't
pressed by your father!
The Nizkor Project -- Ken McVay Director
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=miqil05i42imr45pdmun2kfcqjb1umhivr%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is
Further Proof! V2.5 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:13:30 -0500
Message-ID: <miqil05i42imr45pd...@4ax.com>
_______________________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Accounts Starting At $6.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:51:01 -0700,
><catamont-AF4706...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>[...]
>>And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
>>admitted liar...
>Care to show where I ever made such an admission? YOU ARE THE LIAR AS WELL AS
>YOU ARE A PERJURER!! Now count all of the lies I have caught you and your
>fellow offspring of the father of lies in!
>Yale lied
(900+ lines of Bradshite given the gate)
You're still two tons of delusion, Bloat of Bellville...and don't mind if I
decide to make a contribution to the MS Society for this year's MS150 event by
volunteering to help out at the lunch stop in Bellville, 82 days from now.
They'll be needing help up there, as for the first time, the ride's been
capped at 13,000 registrants. Even though I can't ride this year, I can at
least contribute to their efforts. I'll settle for you knowing that I'll be
two blocks away from your hovel with the broken window, helping the good
people of Bellville out at least one day this year.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Grand Rapids 4, Houston 3 (SO) (January 23)
NEXT GAME: Tuesday, January 25 vs. Milwaukee, 7:05
Joe Bruno
Thrasher - The Anonymous Remailer wrote:
> All entries below collated from various sources and are
> public domain. Information to be used for legitimate
> purposes only and not for threats of death or mayhem.
>
>
>From MacBeth:
'Tis a tale told by an idiot
Full of sound and fury
Signifying nothing
Joe Bruno
Doc Tavish wrote:
>
That's a hot one-Fatboy calling someone else a liar.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Doc Tavish wrote:
>>
>That's a hot one-Fatboy calling someone else a liar.
It's about a 96.8 on most irony meters.
Sara Salzman
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:51:01 -0700,
> <catamont-AF4706...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
> >admitted liar...
>
> Care to show where I ever made such an admission? YOU ARE THE LIAR AS WELL AS
> YOU ARE A PERJURER!! Now count all of the lies I have caught you and your
> fellow
> offspring of the father of lies in!
>
>
[snip over 900 lines of unadulterated drivel]
My God, Mr. Bradbury, are you STILL fixated on Yale Edeiken? First of
all, that case was resolved YEARS ago. Second, Yale hasn't posted here
in what? three years? four years? And yet, you STILL feel obligated to
bore everyone to tears with your continued whining and crying about it.
You can scream in caps all you want, but I have never lied, and I have
never committed perjury. As has been said thousands of times in the
past, if you believe I committed perjury, SUE me. Have the Court decide.
But you won't, because in addition to being a raving lunatic, you're a
raving coward.
Doc Tavish
<catamont-B21D13...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <052av0him6mg7kr15...@4ax.com>,
> Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:51:01 -0700,
>> <catamont-AF4706...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
>> >admitted liar...
>>
>> Care to show where I ever made such an admission? YOU ARE THE LIAR AS WELL AS
>> YOU ARE A PERJURER!! Now count all of the lies I have caught you and your
>> fellow offspring of the father of lies in!
>>
>>
>
>[snip over 900 lines of unadulterated drivel]
Can't deal with it can you?
>My God, Mr. Bradbury, are you STILL fixated on Yale Edeiken? First of
>all, that case was resolved YEARS ago.
In my favor!
>Second, Yale hasn't posted here in what? three years? four years?
He went into exile after his defeats!
>And yet, you STILL feel obligated to bore everyone to tears with your continued whining and crying about it.
Like you and your fellow swine whining about wat happened over 60 years ago? I
am still being defamed with the swine's lies!
>You can scream in caps all you want, but I have never lied,
That is another lie and I have some of your lies documented below too! Care to
count them?
>and I have never committed perjury.
Another lie!
>As has been said thousands of times in the past, if you believe I committed perjury, SUE me. Have the Court decide.
You committed perjury and you know it!
>But you won't, because in addition to being a raving lunatic, you're a
>raving coward.
The coward is Yale for not following through on his appeal and high tailing it
to the hills after I invited him to re-file!
>Sara
You won't admit how you and your pal have lied!
You were caught in one lie above Sara as well as many more in these archives:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman's S&M Bondage-Torture Fantasies Result in Perjury!
Message-ID: <1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 01:35:09 GMT
How about these gems?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/67f975c7438df3b8?dmode=source
Subject: Delusional Sara Salzman Can't Keep Her Lies Straight Because She is a
Pathological Liar... Message-ID: <lu9kg0d6pd3o94anp...@4ax.com>
EXCERPT
Xref:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=tm4i90tg5ub3qq5nt3b0lh3qe0antr5eml%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara Salzman=Pathological Liar...
Message-ID: <tm4i90tg5ub3qq5nt3b0lh3qe0antr5...@4ax.com>
References: <FQJEUCIG38111.628599...@anonymous.poster>
<KyWlc.54871$hR1.25...@fe2.texas.rr.com>
<catamont-05E37A.18523704052...@news-60.giganews.com>
Date: 5 May 2004 16:10:07 GMT
<start/quote>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=vsg420971fcki2mdc58ig57l8n8q1b1f34%404ax.com&rnum=3
(Subject: Re: When will Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish in person?..
Archived locally as: SarasDAlies)
>> >It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us
>> >that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never
>> >been in to see him,
>>
>> TWO lIES!!! I helped him run a sting against a shady car painter,
>
>So he lied when he said he had never met you. You really want to call
>your DA a liar?
<stop/quote>
You claimed above: "the DA definitely told us that he had never met Mr.
Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to see him... he said he had never
met you" YET Sara runs her libelous mouth in the following manner:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-8C6715.21211712082003%40tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: MoreDAlibel_1)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Bradbury = Bald Faced Liar. NO surprise there!!
Date: 13 Aug 2003 03:21:26 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-8C6715.21211712082...@tribune.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
"I assure you, DA Koehn is _not_ infantile, nor are his staff.
But they sure know what you are. And he had no qualms about telling me.
Sara
PS. Who ever said I was going to "file charges" against you? I went to
speak to your DA and your County Sheriff... and I did just that. And we
all had a very good laugh at YOUR expense."
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Those libels conflict with your statements: "the DA definitely told us
that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to see
him... he said he had never met you" YOU ARE TOO DERANGED TO SEE HOW STUPID YOU
LOOK WHEN YOUR LIES AND SMEARS ARE EXPOSED TO ONE AND ALL!!
[...]
More lies and deceptions from Sara Salzman:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-AA748F.23183530092003%40news-60.giganews.com&rnum=6
(Archived locally as: AffidavitNotServed)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,can.general,soc.culture.jewish
Subject: Re: My father liked dressing up as a SS man Nazi
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 23:18:35 -0600
Message-ID: <catamont-AA748F.23183530092...@news-60.giganews.com>
"There was no "perjury," of course. My affidavit was never challenged
by Mr. Bradbury's attorney. And of course, no matter how many times it
has been pointed out to him, Mr. Bradbury believes that the phrase
"Defendant Bradbury and/or his accomplices" means "Scott Bradbury and no
one else." No matter how many times it has been pointed out to him that
the phrases "anti-Semitic activists," and "accomplices" refer to many
different people, Mr. Bradbury stated that it only referred to him.
That's the basis of his "perjury" claim. Needless to say, the District
Attorney of his county laughed out loud when I showed him Mr. Bradbury's
posts claiming such.
And of course, there is no "case." For all of his posturing, blowhard
noises, raving and spewing, Mr. Bradbury has not filed a case. In fact,
when I visited his District Attorney, I was informed that Mr. Bradbury
had not even SPOKEN to the DA in more than three years."
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
As for your lie that your AFFIDAVIT was NOT perjurious and that "[Your]
affidavit was never challenged by Mr. Bradbury's attorney" I answer how could
your AFFIDAVIT be challenged when it was never served along with the rest of the
"manufacture and perjured" complaints which were never served!?
I.E.
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me V1.1 S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb7jbr1rpcs1m8p3...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2n02...@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spamfr...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:
ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place!
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!
Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
"July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
"July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
<END>
As for your lie: "And of course, no matter how many times it has been pointed
out to him, Mr. Bradbury believes that the phrase "Defendant Bradbury and/or his
accomplices" means "Scott Bradbury and no one else." No matter how many times it
has been pointed out to him that the phrases "anti-Semitic activists," and
"accomplices" refer to many different people, Mr. Bradbury stated that it only
referred to him." I answer with- I was the only one sued and I was being held
responsible for the alleged acts of other people so your affidavit did apply
to0me seeing how it was used in a lawsuit against me and no one else!
As for your lie you told on Tue, 30 Sep 2003: "In fact, when I visited his
District Attorney, I was informed that Mr. Bradbury had not even SPOKEN to the
DA in more than three years." YOU CONTRADICTED YOURSELF AGAIN!!!
I.E.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-995F30.20401002022004%40news-60.giganews.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: SaraDAlie05)
From: Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: When will Humphrey have the guts to face Tavish in person?
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:40:10 -0700
Message-ID: <catamont-995F30.20401002022...@news-60.giganews.com>
"It's reqlly no big deal, except that the DA definitely told us that
he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had never been in to
see him, which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many times..."
You went from "In fact, when I visited his District Attorney, I was informed
that Mr. Bradbury had not even SPOKEN to the DA in more than three years."
posted on September 30, 2003 TO "It's really no big deal, except that the DA
definitely told us that he had never met Mr. Bradbury, and Mr. Bradbury had
never been in to see him, which showed us that Mr. Bradbury has lied many, many
times..." on Feb 2, 2004. Care to explain the contradiction Sara? You will never
admit that you're a liar so I am open to another explanation!!
~~End of Excerpts-- Though There are More!!~~
Don't even try to foist the lie that I was served the complaints but I sent them
back unopened because that lie has been thoroughly exposed for what it was!
~~The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked~~
For a fact Yale F. Edeiken had not served his "complaints" on neither my
attorney NOR myself. This was submitted to a civil court of law:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A." Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable
to attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was
opened pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted Daylin B. Leach Esquire <END>
My foes steadfastly claim I personally had received the complaints and then did
a "Return To Stalker" and returned the complaints to Yale F. Edeiken unopened:
"You had NO lawyer at the time the complaints were served -- and in your
YALE F EDEIKEN IS A FILTHY LIAR AS WELL AS ALL THE PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT HIM!
==========================================================================
Full version of the above: The "RETURN TO STALKER" Myth Debunked
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/77682e500f0a2f33?dmode=source
EXCERPT
Here is Yale NOT substantiating all the above lies about me returning his
complaints to him unopened. I think if I did as numerous liars falsely accused
me of doing Yale would be the first one making the accusation I sent the
complaints back unopened!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8dEU6.90336%24gA.2250804%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=5
(Archived locally as: YaleServedNot_1 and YaleServedNot_2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
References: <8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-...@news.noc.cabal.int>
Subject: Re: REPOST: Question For Yale "Phuk Phace" Edeiken... (Also
Representation of the Spirit of Edeiken) Corrected Version
Message-ID: <8dEU6.90336$gA.2250...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 06:12:20 GMT
Ivan Tavishiski [reposted because of rogue cancel]
<REMOVE-ALL-CAPS-TAVISHISKISdoc_tav...@my-deja.comREMOVE-ALL-CAPSREMOVE-ALL-
CAPS-TAVISHISKIS> wrote in message
news:8$-_-$%-%_$$%_-_-$@news.noc.cabal.int...
> If I did NOT have an attorney until after August 25, 2000
You did not. You have a copy of the docket.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: I show a copy of the docket below and it
shows you issuing a subpoena on my attorney on July 14, 2000 which proves you
are lying!!!>>
>How could he do anything with the lawsuit not even knowing the accusations?
At no time did Daylin Leach request a copy of the Complaint.
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: That is another lie. You e-mailed my attorney
"FUCK YOU" when he tried to get your complaints against me as the Petition for
Relief From Judgment proves which I also included below.>>
A copy was served upon you as required by law. If you threw it out
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: IOW you are disagreeing with all the lies
your pals told above about me returning them unopened!>>
or otherwise failed to contact an attorney you thought was representing you,
<<Tavish comment October 30, 2004: My attorney was representing me and I have
the canceled checks to prove it as well as the May 29, 2000 e-mail which you
admitted exists (shown higher up in this post) in which he categorically told
you: "you know the disciplinary rules prohibit you from having any direct
contact with my client as long as he has an attorney. Please refrain from having
any contact with Mr. Bradberry.">>
that is YOUR problem.
Finally, in a verified pleading in September, you claimed that no
Complaint had been filed or served.
Why did you commit perjury?
<<Tavish comment October 30,2004: You are the perjurer Fatboy Edeiken and this
archive shows some stellar examples:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7n...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu8996adgnu8iqg8q7n...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT >>
BTW Yale F. Edeiken also lied about being his own attorney and lied about using
his power of attorney to get my address, telephone number etc. from my ISP!
My proofs:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=XC6G4.578%245e.50857%40newshog.newsread.com&rnum=7
(Archived locally as: YFE_ISPsubpoenaedNOT_1 and YFE_ISPsubpoenaedNOT_2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: John Morris Just Stepped Into Deep Doo Doo
Date: 2000/04/03
Message-ID: <XC6G4.578$5e.50...@newshog.newsread.com>
Defendant Scott Bradbury<sonny...@flash.net> dribbled in message
news:38e54ca3....@news.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Also you have never answered this question and it is rather complex--
> My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain.
It is now.
> An unscrupulous individual obtained it by using his position as an
> attorney to obtain such under false pretenses.
That's a lie. Support it or retract it.
<<Tavish comment October 30: 2004: I support my claim with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies and YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.22...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnapg0...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
<END>
Yale denied doing so UNTIL I got my ISP to FWD me his subpoena which I posted
and then he changed his tune BUT the above proves he lied!
The subpoena which does not show on the docket (which means it was not
registered with the court) and it went directly to Yale's residence where he
distributed the info on it after making his death threat posts!
I.E.
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonny...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonny...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
-----------------
Yale also lied about being his own attorney!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies and YFESubpoenaAttorneyLies2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.22...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnapg0...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH
THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to
incite criminal harassment.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
AND
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=9bzx5.168%240d.11399%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=9
(YFE_AttorneyLies3 and YFE_AttorneyLies4)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Message-ID: <9bzx5.168$0d.11...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 01:20:05 GMT
Doc Tavish <doc_tav...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com> wrote in message
news:o71dss8i5dk9rn47u...@4ax.com...
[...]
> According to the office of
> Andrea Naugle -- Clerk Civil Court
> Lehigh County Court House
>
> (Addressed to Yale F. Edeiken):
>
> The clerk exposed you in a lie that you have been telling! You say
> you have an attorney BUT she says that you are the only attorney!!
And, as you well know, there is an attorney whose identity is being
protected because of the pattern of criminal harassment by you and your
accomplices.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Proof Yale F. Edeiken lied twice about being his own attorney:
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Notice how Yale lied twice about using his own power of attorney to subpoena my
ISP for my address and telephone number as shown above with:
1)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: John Morris Just Stepped Into Deep Doo Doo
Date: 2000/04/03
Message-ID: <XC6G4.578$5e.50...@newshog.newsread.com>
Defendant Scott Bradbury<sonny...@flash.net> dribbled in message
news:38e54ca3....@news.newsguy.com...
[...]
> Also you have never answered this question and it is rather complex--
> My personal information is unlisted and is NOT in public domain.
It is now.
> An unscrupulous individual obtained it by using his position as an
> attorney to obtain such under false pretenses.
That's a lie. Support it or retract it.
<END>
AND
2)
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <y...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?-- Edeiken's
Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 2000/04/08
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.22...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnapg0...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonny...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
<END>
Did you know disseminating confidential subpoenaed information is a criminal
offense!? Did you know that subpoena was not registered with the court and
therefore was not "public information"? Care to show on a docket printout the
subpoena Yale used on Flash Net to violate my right to privacy?
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2519a80170ab08d2?dmode=source
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:02:49 -0500
Message-ID: <m9ron0ln47gllh4ii...@4ax.com>
[...]
The subpoena which does not show on the docket (which means it was not
registered with the court) and it went directly to Yale's residence where he
distributed the info on it after making his death threat posts!
I.E.
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonny...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonny...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
-----
Yale also denied me my legal right to quash the subpoena he used to rob me of my
right to privacy and he did not turn it over to the court either for it to
become "public information" as I prove here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
(Archived locally as: QuashSubpoena)
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.69...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
That subpoena was NOT "turned over" and it does NOT appear on the docket thus it
is NOT "public information" and for a FACT I was not allowed to object or quash
it!
Proof Yale F. Edeiken was e-mailing me against my will BEFORE he issued his
subpoena to rape my right to privacy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Tavish%20Stop%20e-mailing%20me&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1999&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=1999&hl=en
Searched Groups for Tavish Stop e-mailing me from Jan 1, 1999 to Nov 30, 1999.
Results 1 - 10 of about 47
Sample returns:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Tavish%20Stop%20e-mailing%20me&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1999&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=1999&hl=en
Searched Groups for Tavish Stop e-mailing me from Jan 1, 1999 to Nov 30, 1999.
Results 1 - 10 of about 47
Sample returns:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=omf04.1622%240p4.233526%40news.flash.net&rnum=2
(Archived locally as: YaleMail_1)
More E-Mail From Yale- Edited for Brevity
... to make charges.BTW sphincter muscle- stop e-mailing me! ... time and again
to stop it but ... digsig Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRtptdrtqb ...
sci.skeptic - Nov 28, 1999 by Tavish -
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=swE_3.7751%2416.888799%40news.flash.net&rnum=4
(Archived locally as: YaleMail_2)
Is Yale F. Edeiken as Deluded as Andrew Skolnick? Most Likely!
... not ask you numerous times to desist from e-mailing me? ...
sci.skeptic - Nov 23, 1999 by Tavish
Why didn't Yale allow me my legal right to due process and allow me to quash the
subpoena by e-mail? Yale did afterall state: "Materail that is subpoenaed must
be turned over... Subpoenas are NOT automatically issued and the other side has
an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
Why would Yale advise me he subpoenaed info from my ISP when it was his belief I
would never find out? For a fact he did not turn the subpoena over to the court
or else it would be on the Docket printout!!
Docket details of Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786--
Anyone may obtain the docket for $3.00 and here is how and
partially what it shows:
Clerk Civil Court
Lehigh County Court House
Room 202
4555 West Hamilton Street
Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101-1614
and "Request Docket Printout for Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786" and you
will see for yourself among the following:
03-Nov-1999 PRAE FOR SUMMONS
17-Dec-1999 PRAE TO REISSUE WRIT OF SUMMONS
06-Jan-2000 SHRF RTN SUMMONS... DELIVERY DATE 30-Dec-1999
[...]
25-Apr-2000 Y F Edeiken ESQ's NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE SUBPOENA..
[...]
[No subpoena to Flash Net shows! This is FACT! I was not given a chance
either as required by law to object to having my unlisted address and
unlisted telephone number subpoenaed! End of Doc Tavish comment]
From the above one can discern that the subpoena Yale F. Edeiken issued on
November 30, 1999 never made it back to the court house to be entered on the
docket. Yale F. Edeiken had my identity, unlisted telephone number and address
returned to his "drop" at:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104
~~End of GOOGLE Excerpt~~
BTW as for Yale fabricating evidence as this archive gives some shining examples
of:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/2093b5c5d44e358a?dmode=source
Date: 22 Jan 2004 23:53:02 GMT
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken ESQ. Is In Deep Trouble!
http://www.pacode.com/secure/data/204/chapter81/chap81toc.html#3.4.
^^^^^^
That is Pennsylvania Code!!
Rule 3.4. Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel.
A lawyer shall not:
(a) unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully
alter, destroy or conceal a document or other material having potential
evidentiary value or assist another person to do any such act;
(b) falsify evidence,
Comment:
The procedure of the adversary system contemplates that the evidence in a
case is to be marshalled competitively by the contending parties. Fair
competition in the adversary system is secured by prohibitions against
destruction or concealment of evidence, improperly influencing witnesses,
obstructive tactics in discovery procedure, and the like.
Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a
claim or defense. Subject to evidentiary privileges, the right of an opposing
party, including the government, to obtain evidence through discovery or
subpoena is an important procedural right. The exercise of that right can be
frustrated if relevant material is altered, concealed or destroyed. Applicable
law in many jurisdictions makes it an offense to destroy material for purpose of
impairing its availability in a pending proceeding or one whose commencement can
be foreseen. Falsifying evidence is also generally a criminal offense. Paragraph
(a) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized
information.
<END>
Yale never served his complaints and he falsified evidence which is condemned
with: "Falsifying evidence is also generally a criminal offense. Paragraph (a)
applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information."
I ask again-- Who are the liars? ANSWER: Yale F. Edeiken and Sara Salzman!
Yale F.Edeiken confessing his mental state:
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Need I say more?
Tavish
Sara Salzman
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:50:03 -0700,
> <catamont-B21D13...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <052av0him6mg7kr15...@4ax.com>,
> > Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:51:01 -0700,
> >> <catamont-AF4706...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> >And what proof do you have (other than the word of Scott Bradbury,
> >> >admitted liar...
> >>
> >> Care to show where I ever made such an admission? YOU ARE THE LIAR AS WELL
> >> AS
> >> YOU ARE A PERJURER!! Now count all of the lies I have caught you and your
> >> fellow offspring of the father of lies in!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >[snip over 900 lines of unadulterated drivel]
>
> Can't deal with it can you?
Bored to tears by it, actually.
>
> >My God, Mr. Bradbury, are you STILL fixated on Yale Edeiken? First of
> >all, that case was resolved YEARS ago.
>
> In my favor!
JURISDICTION, Mr. Bradbury. The findings of FACT were never disputed.
>
> >Second, Yale hasn't posted here in what? three years? four years?
>
> He went into exile after his defeats!
So why don't you follow his example and go away too?
>
> >And yet, you STILL feel obligated to bore everyone to tears with your
> >continued whining and crying about it.
>
> Like you and your fellow swine whining about wat happened over 60 years ago?
> I
> am still being defamed with the swine's lies!
>
Seven words, Mr. Bradbury: Build A Bridge And Get Over It.
Or, in the words, of Germar Bellinger, "Move on."
> >You can scream in caps all you want, but I have never lied,
>
> That is another lie and I have some of your lies documented below too! Care
> to
> count them?
No lies below. Just more of your idiotic cutting and pasting.
>
> >and I have never committed perjury.
>
> Another lie!
Not according to the Court, Mr. Bradbury. And THAT is what matters. My
affidavit was ACCEPTED AS FACT.
>
> >As has been said thousands of times in the past, if you believe I committed
> >perjury, SUE me. Have the Court decide.
>
> You committed perjury and you know it!
Nope. Sue me, Coward.
>
> >But you won't, because in addition to being a raving lunatic, you're a
> >raving coward.
>
> The coward is Yale for not following through on his appeal and high tailing
> it
> to the hills after I invited him to re-file!
Yale isn't your lap dog. You can invite him to sit on your face, too,
but that doesn't mean he has to do it.
>
But YOU are the one calling me a perjurer (which is actionable libel, by
the way). If you think I have perjured myself, SUE ME. But you won't,
because you're a raving coward.
> >Sara
>
> You won't admit how you and your pal have lied!
>
Because we haven't, no matter how many lines of idiotic cut and paste
crap you claim is "evidence."
You're a psychotic lunatic, Mr. Bradbury. You and Bruno and Ilsa and
your Topf barbecue and your Cessna and your Reginald McTavish, and all
your other sock puppets. You belong in a rubber room.
Sara
[another 800+ lines of blather deleted]
Mr.Extreme
Sara Salzman wrote:
--
THe HNIC has posted, bitches!!
x-- 100 Proof News - http://www.100ProofNews.com
x-- 3,500+ Binary NewsGroups, and over 90,000 other groups
x-- Access to over 1 Terabyte per Day - $8.95/Month
x-- UNLIMITED DOWNLOAD
Mr.Extreme
MONEY! I HAVE RAPE ON MY MIND TOO!!!!!!!!
Sara Salzman wrote:
--
Kenneth McVay OBC
In article <ct4oar$47sf$3...@news3.infoave.net>,
Mr.Extreme <extre...@theHNIC.net> wrote:
>POST YOUR ADDRESS BITCH!!! I WILL BEAT YOU LIKE YOU OWE ME
>MONEY! I HAVE RAPE ON MY MIND TOO!!!!!!!!
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
1. Defendant Scott Bradbury publishes material on the Internet under
the pseudonym "Doc Tavish."
2. Defendant Scott Bradbury has in the past and continues in the
present to use various services to publish his material in a manner in
which it cannot be traced back to its source.
3. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published material on the Internet
under the pseudonym "Nazihunter."
4. Defendant Scott Bradbury has created and published on the
Internet under the name of "Nazihunter" a website which gives his own
address and telephone number.
5. Defendant Scott Bradbury has thereafter falsely claimed that said
website was created by others in an attempt to harass him.
6. Defendant Scott Bradbury has, at various times, published his own
address and telephone number under the name of "Nazihunter" together with
various threats of violence.
7. Defendant Scott Bradbury has thereafter made the false claim,
based upon such publications, that he is being harassed and threatened by
others.
8. Defendant Scott Bradbury has at various times contacted various
internet service providers and, using the false pretense that he was the
author, cancelled the published work of others.
9. Defendant Scott Bradbury has participated in campaigns of
threats, defamation, forgery, and harassment in order to intimidate and
harass his opponent and prevent them from exercising their rights of free
speech.
10. Defendant Scott Bradbury has assisted and/or obtained the
assistance of others in said campaigns, including but not limited to David
E. Michael, Donald Ellis, and "Pat Blakely."
11. That Donald Ellis has published material under the pseudonyms
"Mike Kalvatis," "Pat Blakely," "RevWhite" and "Rabbi Brimstone."
12. That at all times relevant hereto Defendant Scott Bradbury was
aware of the use of those pseudonyms by Donald Ellis.
13. The targets of said campaigns of harassment have included, inter
alia, Plaintiff, Sara Salzman, Jeffrey G. Brown, Ken McVey, Scott Murphy,
David Gehrig, Andrew Skolnick, Steven Wolk, Mike Curtis, Andrew Mathis, and
all others named in "The Nizkor Phonebook."
14. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Jeffrey G. Brown and published said material on the
Internet falsely claiming that it originated from Jeffrey G. Brown.
15. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Andrew Skolnick and published said material on the Internet
falsely claiming that it originated from Andrew Skolnick.
16. Defendant Scott Bradbury has forged material which he claimed
originated from Plaintiff and published said material on the Internet
falsely claiming that it originated from Plaintiff.
17. Said forgeries have included forgeries making unwanted sexual
advances to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
18. That no such unwanted sexual advances were ever made.
19. That notwithstanding the fact that said communications were
forgeries and known to be such by Defendant Scott Bradbury, Defendant Scott
Bradbury forwarded them to third persons claiming that they were true and
accurate.
20. That the purpose of Defendant Scott Bradbury in distributing said
forgeries was to injure the reputation of Plaintiff and to induce others to
terminate a business contract with Plaintiff.
21. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published the statement that he has
been threatened with homosexual rape by Plaintiff, Jeffrey G. Brown and
Kenneth McVay.
22. Said claim was published despite the fact that no such threat had
ever been made to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
23. Defendant Scott Bradbury has published the claim that Andrew
Mathis, Ph. D., had solicited minor boys by offering them alcoholic
beverages.
24. Said claim was made despite the fact that Defendant Scott
Bradbury knew that no such offer or solicitation had ever been made.
25. Since the filing of this lawsuit Defendant Scott Bradbury
increased his efforts to harass and threaten Plaintiff and to distribute
false and defamatory information about him in an effort to intimidate
Plaintiff.
26. Defendant has been assisted in this effort by David E. Michael
and Donald Ellis publishing material either under their own names,
pseudonyms, or anonymously.
27. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by
"mailbombing" him by sending gigantic files to him as electronic
communications.
28. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt Plaintiff's internet service by asking
various commercial services to send him electronic communications thereby
overwhelming his service provider with "spam."
29. Defendant Scott Bradbury, either personally and/or acting through
others who were, then and there, acting with his knowledge assistance and
consent have attempted to disrupt the internet service of others by send
them "mailbombs" in Plaintiff's name and using Plaintiff's name to spam
such persons.
30. On or about July 2, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates acting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published personal information about Plaintiff's family including his
father, mother, sister and brother including their names addresses,
telephone numbers with instructions to call and harass them. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as "Exhibit "A."
31. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him and his family.
32. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
33. On or about July 7, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury either
personally or acting through his associates a ting then and there with the
knowledge, consent, approval and assistance of Defendant Scott Bradbury
published four threats of violence against Defendant Scott Bradbury. One
such publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit "B."
34. The purpose of such forgeries was to harass Plaintiff with false
charges.
35. Notwithstanding that he was aware said publications were
forgeries, Defendant Scott Bradbury forwarded copies of said publications
to Plaintiff's internet provider claiming that Plaintiff had published said
material.
36. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to the law firm of Todd S. Miller & Associates
notwithstanding the fact that said publications were known to him to be
forgeries.
37. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff.
38. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.
39. Said publication was made with the consent, approval, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
40. That Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely" a/k/a "RevWhite" forwarded
said publications to Plaintiff's internet service provider and to various
law enforcement agencies notwithstanding the fact that said publications
were known to him to be forgeries.
41. The purpose of said action was to adversely affect the
professional standing of Plaintiff and to have fraudulent criminal charges
brought against him.
42. That such distribution was done with the approval, consent, and
knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who was at all times aware of the
forgery.
43. On or about July 10, 2000, a forgery was published under the name
of Plaintiff making a death threat against the Woman's Center of Allentown.
Said publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit " C."
44. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely"
a/k/a "RevWhite" a/k/a "Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
45. Said publication was made with the assistance, consent, approval,
and knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
46. On or about July 14, 2000, a forgery was published under the name
of "Wendy Edeiken" making a death threat against Plaintiff. Said
publication is attached hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit " D."
47. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely"
a/k/a 'RevWhite" a/k/a 'Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
48. Said publication was made with the assistance, consent, approval,
and knowledge of Defendant Scott Bradbury who had, at that time, a full
understanding of the purpose and intent of that publication.
49. On or about July 22, 2000, Defendant Scott Bradbury published a
direct threat of violence against Plaintiff. Saud threat is attached
hereto and made part hereof as Exhibit 'E."
50. Defendant Scott Bradbury has contributed to, participated in
and/or cooperated with the establishment on the Internet of a site known as
"The Nizkor Phonebook."
51. The purpose of "The Nizkor Phonebook" is to threaten, harass,
and/or intimidate Jews and others who disagree with Defendant Scott
Bradbury and his accomplices.
52. The purpose of 'The Nizkor Phonebook" was at all times known to
Defendant Scott Bradbury.
53. On or about July 24, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display a picture of an automatic pistol above personal information about
Plaintiff and his wife including their names addresses, telephone numbers,
and a map whereby they could be located.
54. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him.
55. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
56. On or about July 25, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display personal information about Plaintiff and his wife including their
names addresses, telephone numbers, and a map whereby they could be located
surrounded by images of dripping blood.
57. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against him.
58. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
59. On or about July 29, 2000, "The Nizkor Phonebook" was edited to
display personal information about Plaintiff's father, mother, sister, and
brother including their names addresses, telephone numbers, and a map
whereby they could be located surrounded by images of dripping blood.
60. The purpose of said publication was to threaten, harass, and/or
intimidate Plaintiff and to encourage others to commit acts of violence
against them.
61. Said purpose was at all times known to Defendant Scott Bradbury.
62. On or about July 14, 2000, a publication called "The Dead Pool"
was made by Donald Ellis under the pseudonym "Rabbi Brimstone" which named
various opponents of Defendant Scott Bradbury and his associates asking for
wagers as to which would die first. Said publication is attached hereto
and made
part hereof as Exhibit "F."
63. Said publication was made by Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat Blakely,"
a/k/a "RevWhite" a/k/a "Rabbi Brimstone" with the purpose of harassing,
threatening, and intimidating the persons named on said list.
64. The title of said publication was intended as a reference to a
list of death threats in a motion picture of the same title, and in said
motion picture members of the "Dead Pool" list were murdered.
65. In subsequent publications on the topic, Donald Ellis a/k/a "Pat
Blakely" demonstrated that he was familiar with this significance of the
title, and therefore the "Dead Pool" post can reasonably be construed as a
series of death threats against the individuals listed therein.
66. Defendant Scott Bradbury was aware of the threatening nature of
the publication at the time that it was made.
67. Defendant Scott Bradbury advocates that Jews be deprived of the
civil, political, and human rights in the United States.
68. Defendant Scott Bradbury endorses the stereotype of Jews as
depicted in the propaganda of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis as true and
accurate.
69. Defendant Scott Bradbury has claimed that the Holocaust
did not occur.
70. Defendant Scott Bradbury has endorsed the positions of William
Pierce and the National Alliance, a neo-Nazi and violently anti-Semitic
organization which teaches that Jews are "mud people" who should be
murdered in a nationwide pogrom.
--
"...the antisemite is immune to refutation from either facts or logic.
An antisemite has chosen to live in hatred, without regard to either
facts or logic." (Matas, David. Bloody Speech, p. 37)
Doc Tavish
kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>[trailer trash ng's trimmed]
>
>In article <ct4oar$47sf$3...@news3.infoave.net>,
>Mr.Extreme <extre...@theHNIC.net> wrote:
>>POST YOUR ADDRESS BITCH!!! I WILL BEAT YOU LIKE YOU OWE ME
>>MONEY! I HAVE RAPE ON MY MIND TOO!!!!!!!!
>
>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
>Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
>
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
Proof Ken McVay, director of The Nizkor Project, can only engage in lies and ad
hominem attacks when he can't refute what is posted which is factual and
documented:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/517bdfce9a837b73
Subject: Re: Scott "Bloated Blimp of Bellville" Bradbury: Equal opportunity
hatemonger
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 20:39:31 -0600
Message-ID: <ps9801lmjfdqgl10u...@4ax.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtitled: "Ken McVay's "The Nizkor Project" passes off manufactured evidence as
truth." If Ken McVay will willfully lie about a court case which took place just
five some odd years ago and offer manufactured and perjured evidence as fact
then why should he be trusted with historical events which took place sixty
years ago? If all Then Nizkor Project can do is engage in ad hominem attacks and
smear when documented proofs are posted and URLs are given then what does that
say of his integrity!? If all Ken McVay can do is quote as truth a disgraced
attorney's lies made in a civil court and who has been disciplined three times
by the highest court in his state for unethical behavior PLUS being convicted
and fined for assaulting and harassing a female deputy sheriff then what else
could be said to prove Ken McVay is a dishonest person? I gave all the facts and
they are fully documented and anyone can verify my claims! Ken McVay has not to
this day ever refuted my claim I was not given my day in court to contest evil
lies made about me! I showed many examples of perjured statements which Ken
McVay and his Nizkor deceitfully declare are factual. May the link above stir
the ire and outrage of all fine people who believe in ethical conduct for an
Officer of the Court and who believe in playing fair. Tavish
The American Jewish Committee
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
1-250-616-9431
1-416-966-0461
1-417-781-3282
wpg...@kenmcvay.com
kmc...@nizkor.org
KMC...@VERITAS.NIZKOR.ORG
--Nizkor.Org Director, Ken McVay, Condoning Child Porn--
"I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of
proportion (I've been on and around the Net since 1988, and have
yet to come across anything I'd consider "child porn." I've
seen photos of naked children, but then I've got some of those in
my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society)." - Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html
(Archived locally as: pedo_McVay)
Verified by John Morris with Message ID:
cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: John_Confirms)
(For the record this child porn apologist is funded by B'nai Brith
as shown here: http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html
B'nai Brith must condone pictures of "naked children" too!)
Here is a photo of Ken McVay, director of WWW.NIZKOR.ORG-- does he
not have the uncouth look as to fit the profile of a person who
would say in general regarding child porn: "I am weary of seeing the
issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've been on and
around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything I'd
consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, ... and
fail to see the harm, or any great moral danger to our society)."?
http://www.protocol.gov.bc.ca/protocol/prgs/obc/1995/1995_KMcVay.jpg
(Archived locally as: ChickenHawk_McVay)
Would any of you want to leave this person, Ken McVay,
alone with your children?
The Nizkor Project aka Ken McVay
P.O. Box 244, Station A
Nanaimo, B.C. V9R 5K9 Canada
Does anything else need to be said other than the only way for Ken McVay to view
those pictures of naked children on the NET is for him to have downloaded them!
THAT IS FACT!!
NOT ONLY IS MCVAY A LYING PERV AND ARRESTED CAR THIEF HE IS ALSO A COMMUNIST
SYMPATHIZER AND TAX CHEAT!!
~~Ken McVay Doesn't Laugh at Communists - He Supports Them!~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=7soT9.302%24q%253.15...@news.nnrp.ca&lr=&hl=en
(Archived locally as: McVayCommieLuv_1 and McVayCommieLuv_2)
Subject: Re: SCOTT BRADBURY IS AN IDIOT
References: <52f5294a95c44dbd...@dizum.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=52f5294a95c44dbdfb4e64755beb2b79%40dizum.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: McVayCommieLuv_3 and McVayCommieLuv_4)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
From: kmc...@vex.net (Ken McVay)
Message-ID: <7soT9.302$q%3.158...@news.nnrp.ca>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:27:47 GMT
>Seeing how you hate Nazis for all the deaths they caused in the 20th
>Century; it would only be logical you would be against a person who
>embraces an ideology which has killed and is killing even more people.
<<Tavish comment: The person referred to above is communist David Lethbridge.>>
Like, er, Democracy, for example?
<<Tavish comment: Is that the new code word for communism? I have never ever
heard of communism being a Democracy!!>>
>You don't sense a slight bit of hypocrisy on your part? Communism still
>has over a billion people enslaved today and Nazism does not exist as
>a political entity.
Did you know that Communism was perfectly legal in Canada, and that
folks representing the CP of Canada run for Parliament every time an
election rolls around?
Most folks just laugh at 'em...
<<Tavish comment: I know for a fact that neither YOU nor your funding arm B'nai
Brith laugh at communists because your Nizkor Project and B'nai Brith are
documented as aiding and abetting self confessed communist David Lethbridge!!>>
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Proofs of my charges I made above:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=p0afnvchj52pcuh6c0dk78f9bs7ngfetac%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: NIZKOR.ORG Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge Against
America, Capitalism, and Christianity R_0928
Message-ID: <p0afnvchj52pcuh6c...@4ax.com>
Date: 29 Sep 2003 03:38:54 GMT
------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=4186tvsr4d3oiodp2nibbuvuj91rakvimb%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: UPDATED! B'nai Brith Allies Itself With Communist David Lethbridge
Against Capitalism, and Christianity V2.0 R_1207
Message-ID: <4186tvsr4d3oiodp2...@4ax.com>
Date: 7 Dec 2003 12:48:39 GMT
=============================
Full version of: Ken McVay Doesn't Laugh at Communists - He Supports Them!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=odsdo0d68mfgpe3bq3ovn9sr63ppurphkg%404ax.com&rnum=1
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=miqil05i42imr45pdmun2kfcqjb1umhivr%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: $50,000 Not Reported to CCRA by The Nizkor Project? Ken McVay is Lying
About Funds He Has Apparently NOT Reported to CCRA!! SAAF Report for 2002 Is
Further Proof! V2.5 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:13:30 -0500
Message-ID: <miqil05i42imr45pd...@4ax.com>
Joel Rosenberg
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:30:10 -0000, <10vct0i...@corp.supernews.com>
> kmc...@shell.vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>
>
>>[trailer trash ng's trimmed]
>>
>>In article <ct4oar$47sf$3...@news3.infoave.net>,
>>Mr.Extreme <extre...@theHNIC.net> wrote:
>>
>>>POST YOUR ADDRESS BITCH!!! I WILL BEAT YOU LIKE YOU OWE ME
>>>MONEY! I HAVE RAPE ON MY MIND TOO!!!!!!!!
>>
>>Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-RA.01
>>Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
>>
>> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>>
>> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
>
>
> Proof Ken McVay, director of The Nizkor Project, can only engage in lies and ad
> hominem attacks
Hmm... I guess the sheep deflated, Scotty?
derek_...@yahoo.com
> Why do you want to be Scott Bradbury, little boy?
Little Tommie the Liar must be *much* worse off than we think if he
thinks being Scott Bradbury would be an improvement!
Derek