Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Guantanamo Bay inmates repeatedly attacked & assaulted by guards

6 views
Skip to first unread message

gr...@internet.charitydays.co.uk

unread,
May 16, 2004, 3:39:38 PM5/16/04
to
Bush does not need a Coalition
____________________________________________________________


The US military is larger than all the Coalition forces put together.

He can rule the world from the White House.

World domination does not require consent or approval.

"Bow and kowtow before our awesome military might."

____________________________________________________________

SherrieG

unread,
May 16, 2004, 4:55:18 PM5/16/04
to
And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they would
have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?


<gr...@internet.charitydays.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hqgfa0dvm1rh9rt36...@4ax.com...

Jane

unread,
May 16, 2004, 7:03:55 PM5/16/04
to

"SherrieG" <cinym...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:WyQpc.2898$SZ4....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...

> And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they
would
> have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?
>

Good point! The US could wipe anyone off the map if they wanted to, yet
they chose to "fight fair". The same with Israel. They go out of their way
to avoid civilians and the Palestinians put kids in the line of fire so they
can accuse Israel of targeting kids. Neither the US nor Israel will ever
win the public relations battle, as so many people refuse to see reality.

Jane


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 16, 2004, 11:46:59 PM5/16/04
to

"SherrieG" <cinym...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:WyQpc.2898$SZ4....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they
would
> have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?

Sigh!!!!! The tragedy is, you have used it, sweetie. Against innocent Iraqi
men, women, and children and to boot, you have unleashed your military
sadists and lesbians dominatrix's to humiliate chained and manacled victims,
both male and female.

You are a nation of lesbians and perverts, that's the message the rest of
the world is getting from this.

If any country had what you have, they would certainly use it if attacked by
you, as the alternative is suppression, murder of your countrymen and sexual
abuse at the hands of your lesbians and sadists.

The fact is, relations between you assholes and the EU are turning sour and
the EU does have the numbers and power to confront you, so it's time to eat
a bit of humble pie and stop trying to bully the rest of the world into
allowing you to steal their resources and lets face it, stealing oil is what
the invasion of Iraq was all about.

The shame of it all is that the stolen oil will go to pay welfare to
layabout, non-productive jews and coons like those who frequent this ng.

Your politicians , by unleashing the lesbians and sadists have ensured the
job of your military in Iraq is made many times more difficult and
dangerous, because Arab men, due to cultural ideals, will fight to their
death in preference to being abused and humiliated by your hoard of lesbian
jailers.

You people have become soft and debauched as did the Romans prior to their
downfall, you are so soft, you do not have the domestic stomach to fight a
protracted war.

The moms and dads of America have been betrayed so often by the pro-Zionist
US Government, that they will never allow an unwilling son or daughter to go
to the slaughter again whilst the likes of Bush bug out by joining the
national Guard only to shirk even that duty.

My personal opinion is that Bush will use this scandal to turn tail and run
from the mess he has made in Iraq and leave the UN to clean it up, there
will be years of bloodshed until the majority tribe takes over and a new
Saddam Hussein is installed.

Just remember sweetie, the Vietcong and NVA wopped your ass with fewer
soldiers and comparatively stone age weapons, so don't get too
cocky....mmmkay?


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 16, 2004, 11:55:09 PM5/16/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:krSpc.1656$qJ5.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

>
> "SherrieG" <cinym...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:WyQpc.2898$SZ4....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they
> would
> > have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?
> >
>
> Good point! The US could wipe anyone off the map if they wanted to, yet
> they chose to "fight fair".

Get those hormones seen to and start thinking straight, sweetie.
The US could not use nuclear weapons there without firstly contamminating
every nation in the region (including Israel) and even a fair bit of Europe.

>The same with Israel. They go out of their way
> to avoid civilians and the Palestinians put kids in the line of fire so
they
> can accuse Israel of targeting kids.

Oh fuck off, stupid, Israel is firing rockets into refugee camps.... the
homes of these kids you claim are prodded into the line of fire, you are
obviously a pubecent dreamer or a valium addled, frustrated housewife.

> Neither the US nor Israel will ever
> win the public relations battle, as so many people refuse to see reality.

Exactly!!! When you see the reality of what appears every night on your
television and pull your politicians into gear, you don't have a chance of
getting any support from people not poisoned by your ridiculous mom and
apple pie patriotism.

Go back to the kitchen, stupid, you are out of your league here.

>
> Jane
>
>


Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 4:31:26 AM5/17/04
to

"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40a83...@127.0.0.1...

I expected that reaction! You proved my point.

Jane
> >
> >
>
>


Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 6:09:07 AM5/17/04
to
"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40a83...@127.0.0.1>...

I'm not sure if you are so insulting and dismissive because I have a
different opinion than you or because I am female. We are not exactly
debating Einstein and Da Vinci here, are we? As for going back to the
kitchen, I have probably been gainfully employed longer than you have,
and probably work harder, too.

"Liberals" are for free speech...but only if you agree with them!

Jane
> >
> >

tw

unread,
May 17, 2004, 6:48:19 AM5/17/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8a04f01.04051...@posting.google.com...

Eh? How is he trying to stifle your free speech? By insults? He is just
exercising his freedom of speech!Freedom of speech doesn't protect you from
people saying nasty stuff when they disagree with you, ya
know, which sort of makes your last point a *tad* hypocritical doesn't it?


BroJack

unread,
May 17, 2004, 7:01:02 AM5/17/04
to
On 17 May 2004 03:09:07 -0700, pushl...@hotmail.com (Jane) wrote:


>I'm not sure if you are so insulting and dismissive because I have a
>different opinion than you or because I am female.

It's primarily because he's anti-Semite.

BroJack

Patrick Keenan

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:44:25 AM5/17/04
to
"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8a04f01.04051...@posting.google.com...

Neither, really. It's just all that Mr. Cummins is capable of. Plus, he
will take advantage of any opportunity, real, imagined, or wholly fictional,
to slag Jews and/or Israel.

-pk

Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 9:37:05 AM5/17/04
to
"tw" <n...@no.com> wrote in message news:<c8a55f$2qa$1...@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...

Now, if I were to say something roughly equivalent to "Go back to the
kitchen, stupid, etc" , say "Go bow towards Mecca, stupid, you're out
of your league here", you would call me a racist. Who's the hypocrite
now?

I'm not going to lose any sleep over people saying nasty stuff, but I
do think that adults should be able to disagree without regressing to
playground tactics.

Jane

tw

unread,
May 17, 2004, 9:49:47 AM5/17/04
to

Well, that's free speech isn't it?

> Who's the hypocrite
> now?

Neither - I don't see what this has to do with stifling of free speech. We
are both free to state those things.

> I'm not going to lose any sleep over people saying nasty stuff, but I
> do think that adults should be able to disagree without regressing to
> playground tactics.

Indeed. This IS usenet though, and you did accuse "liberals" of being
anti-free speech using a false example.

tw

unread,
May 17, 2004, 11:08:58 AM5/17/04
to

"BroJack" <Bro...@windswept.net> wrote in message
news:40a8d281...@news.newshosting.com...

> On Mon, 17 May 2004 15:49:47 +0200, "tw" <n...@no.com> wrote:
>
> >Indeed. This IS usenet though, and you did accuse "liberals" of being
> >anti-free speech using a false example.
>
> Been to an American college lately?

Never, in fact.

> How's that for an example?

I have no idea, see above. How is that relevant to Jane's orginal point
though?

Grantland

unread,
May 17, 2004, 12:33:27 PM5/17/04
to
pushl...@hotmail.com (Jane) wrote:


>I'm not going to lose any sleep over people saying nasty stuff, but I
>do think that adults should be able to disagree without regressing to

>playground tactics, don't you think, Tony?
>
>Jane

Looks like the hulk has met his mate. Gross!
w~

@byplane.com Jason James

unread,
May 17, 2004, 2:41:02 PM5/17/04
to

"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40a83...@127.0.0.1...
>
> "Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:krSpc.1656$qJ5.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
> >
> > "SherrieG" <cinym...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > news:WyQpc.2898$SZ4....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > > And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they
> > would
> > > have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?
> > >
> >
> > Good point! The US could wipe anyone off the map if they wanted to, yet
> > they chose to "fight fair".
>
> Get those hormones seen to and start thinking straight, sweetie.

Nice pick-up line Grossout. (ROTFLMAO!)


> The US could not use nuclear weapons there without firstly contamminating
> every nation in the region (including Israel) and even a fair bit of
Europe.

Here, Grossout demostrates why he failed physics.....

> >The same with Israel. They go out of their way
> > to avoid civilians and the Palestinians put kids in the line of fire so
> they
> > can accuse Israel of targeting kids.
>
> Oh fuck off, stupid, Israel is firing rockets into refugee camps.... the
> homes of these kids you claim are prodded into the line of fire, you are
> obviously a pubecent dreamer or a valium addled, frustrated housewife.

And Grossout degenerates from his innate repulsive state to pure excrement
when confronted with a truth he finds uncomfortable.

> > Neither the US nor Israel will ever
> > win the public relations battle, as so many people refuse to see
reality.
>
> Exactly!!! When you see the reality of what appears every night on your
> television and pull your politicians into gear, you don't have a chance of
> getting any support from people not poisoned by your ridiculous mom and
> apple pie patriotism.

Yep,...he did use his spellcheck on this passage of dreck.

> Go back to the kitchen, stupid, you are out of your league here.

So, being in your league constitutes what? Shooting your mouth off with the
inanity of a fuckwit.


Jason


> > Jane
> >
> >
>
>


Werewolfy

unread,
May 17, 2004, 2:53:45 PM5/17/04
to
"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40a83...@127.0.0.1>...
you don't have a chance of getting any support from people not
poisoned by your ridiculous mom and apple pie patriotism.

================================================================================

Well, it's an odd name...but I think I like you Gassen!

'Mom and apple pie patriotism' ;)

Couldn't have said it any better myself.

Werewolfy

Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 3:37:27 PM5/17/04
to

"Grantland" <mit...@iafrica.com> wrote in message
news:40a8e8a6...@ct-news.iafrica.com...

> pushl...@hotmail.com (Jane) wrote:
>
>
> >I'm not going to lose any sleep over people saying nasty stuff, but I
> >do think that adults should be able to disagree without regressing to
> >playground tactics.

> >
> >Jane
>
> Looks like the hulk has met his mate. Gross!
> w~

Leave my posts alone.

jane


Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 6:09:05 PM5/17/04
to

"BroJack" <Bro...@windswept.net> wrote in message
news:40a8d281...@news.newshosting.com...
> On Mon, 17 May 2004 15:49:47 +0200, "tw" <n...@no.com> wrote:
>
> >Indeed. This IS usenet though, and you did accuse "liberals" of being
> >anti-free speech using a false example.
>
> Been to an American college lately?
>
> How's that for an example?
>
> BroJack

Good example. So are trade unions. Try going to a union meeting with a
dissenting opinion and watch them chew you up and spit you out!

Jane (who has to belong to a union as a condition of employment, but refuses
to attend meetings after one sobering experience...and I wasn't even the one
with the dissenting opinion!)
>


Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 6:11:28 PM5/17/04
to

"tw" <n...@no.com> wrote in message
news:c8afpo$8f4$1...@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se...

If I had said that in a different thread, you WOULD have called me a racist!

Jane

Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 7:55:52 PM5/17/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4M_pc.9820$qJ5.2...@news20.bellglobal.com...

You're welcome Missy.


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:03:21 PM5/17/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8a04f01.04051...@posting.google.com...

Dismissive? Didn't I put a counter argument to you?

> We are not exactly
> debating Einstein and Da Vinci here, are we?

Exactly! So why try to pull the wool over peoples eyes on a subject that is
so black and white?
It is obvious to all that Israel has stolen Palestinian land and is the
agressor in the conflict.

> As for going back to the
> kitchen, I have probably been gainfully employed longer than you have,
> and probably work harder, too.

Hmmmmm, interesting, tell us a little bit more about your 'life experience'
darling?

>
> "Liberals" are for free speech...but only if you agree with them!

Uh! I figured your left wing, Kosher, Kibbutz, posting style indicated you
were a Liberal.... do you know what a Liberal is?

>
> Jane

Lastly, do you cook and wash?

Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:11:04 PM5/17/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:qKaqc.12851$qJ5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...

If women were taken seriously at trade union meetings, we would still have
kids working down coal mines.


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:17:17 PM5/17/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:a8a04f01.04051...@posting.google.com...
> "tw" <n...@no.com> wrote in message
news:<c8a55f$2qa$1...@newstree.wise.edt.ericsson.se>...
> Now, if I were to say something roughly equivalent to "Go back to the
> kitchen, stupid, etc" , say "Go bow towards Mecca, stupid, you're out
> of your league here", you would call me a racist.

Not at all, I am a fair cook when I put my mind to it and Mecca holds no
particular fascination for me. I am not what you Americans call 'a rag
head'.

> Who's the hypocrite
> now?
>

> I'm not going to lose any sleep over people saying nasty stuff, but I
> do think that adults should be able to disagree without regressing to
> playground tactics.
>

> Jane

I retract my cuss words and other 'nasty' stuff,
I'm starting to take a shine to you, Lassie.
If you will allow me, I will email you a document describing just how fair
Israel fights.


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:20:36 PM5/17/04
to

"BroJack" <Bro...@windswept.net> wrote in message
news:40a89b36...@news.newshosting.com...

Bwaaaaaahahahahahaha, yep, everyone who posts something I don't agree with
is a Semite as far as the Semites are concerned.


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:28:18 PM5/17/04
to

"Jason James" <flyhi @byplane.com> wrote in message
news:2H7qc.43975$TT.1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au...

<snip Dopeys waffle>

You have reached the zenith of your stupidity, Dopey.
You are no longer worth debating.
I now consider you to be merely the village idiot, good for nothing more
than to throw stones at.
You are so stupid, you dare not post anything here anymore, in case your ego
is bruised when such things as the origins of the term 'Sado Massochism' are
revealed to you, eh Dopey?


Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 17, 2004, 8:33:39 PM5/17/04
to

"Werewolfy" <RickyCo...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:85ebfda0.0405...@posting.google.com...

> "Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<40a83...@127.0.0.1>...
> you don't have a chance of getting any support from people not
> poisoned by your ridiculous mom and apple pie patriotism.
>
>
============================================================================
====
>
> Well, it's an odd name...but I think I like you Gassen!

Yeah, I can't figure out why all the holocaust believers here take so much
offence to the nym Gassen Burnham!
They even whined so loudly that one pro-kike provider closed my account.

>
> 'Mom and apple pie patriotism' ;)
>
> Couldn't have said it any better myself.

Gotta admit, it isn't mine, I heard it years ago, I think it was when
Vietnam was going on, and it stuck in my mind.

Nationalism is a system of ethics that everyone should be free to engage in,
not just the inhabitants of the JewSA.

>
> Werewolfy


Jane

unread,
May 17, 2004, 9:02:29 PM5/17/04
to

"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40a95...@127.0.0.1...

I'm not an American.

Jane

tw

unread,
May 18, 2004, 4:14:56 AM5/18/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:OMaqc.12878$qJ5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...

So what? You have already admitted you are prejucided against muslims, so
it's not as if you disagree with that assessment is it?

Anyway, it's all rather irrelevant to your whining which was brought about
by mistaking disagreement for an attempt to stifle your free speech.
Admirably illustrated by your inability to rebut the following points:

Gassen Burnham

unread,
May 18, 2004, 8:36:02 AM5/18/04
to

"Jane" <pushl...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8hdqc.13868$qJ5.3...@news20.bellglobal.com...

Canadian....close enough, you are just the poor Americans.


Leonidas Rex

unread,
May 18, 2004, 5:29:42 PM5/18/04
to
Gassen Burnham wrote:

>
> "SherrieG" <cinym...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:WyQpc.2898$SZ4....@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> And here's something to consider. If Iraq had had what we have, they
> would
>> have used it. We have it and don't. You feelin lucky?
>

> Sigh!!!!! The tragedy is, you have used it, sweetie. Against innocent
> Iraqi men, women, and children and to boot, you have unleashed your
> military sadists and lesbians dominatrix's to humiliate chained and
> manacled victims, both male and female.


Leonidas Rex:

The young Lady you refer to is now pregnant, so why call her a lesbian for
any other reason than to vent your anti-American spleen? And let us not
forget that the Yank dominatrix is modeled on the European Doma.


> You are a nation of lesbians and perverts, that's the message the rest of
> the world is getting from this.


Leonidas Rex:

Another gush from your spleen. The pages of our book of perversions are
ripped from that of the Continent and "homo boys school canning land",
(guess where that is). Do you think that we Yanks don't notice what you
frisky characters are up to on your side of the pond?


> The fact is, relations between you assholes and the EU are turning sour
> and the EU does have the numbers and power to confront you, so it's time
> to eat a bit of humble pie and stop trying to bully the rest of the world
> into allowing you to steal their resources and lets face it, stealing oil
> is what the invasion of Iraq was all about.


Leonidas Rex:

What a pedestrian conclusion in regard to possible motive. How can a
revisionist poster to alt.revisionism not realize that the United States of
America is the "dog" being wagged by the "tail" that is the jew power
construct? So why blame the dog for being wagged by the tail, especially in
view of the fact that the jews control the mass mind of Whiteness?

> The shame of it all is that the stolen oil will go to pay welfare to
> layabout, non-productive jews and coons like those who frequent this ng.


Leonidas Rex:

Finally, synchronization!


> Your politicians , by unleashing the lesbians and sadists have ensured the
> job of your military in Iraq is made many times more difficult and
> dangerous, because Arab men, due to cultural ideals, will fight to their
> death in preference to being abused and humiliated by your hoard of
> lesbian jailers.


Leonidas Rex:

Yea, those rag heads don't think much of broads do they? Actually, the sand
niggers hated Whitey with the murderous passion of racial envy before an
eighty pound twenty year old gal from West Virginia had the time of her
young life with then. What a hoot!


> You people have become soft and debauched as did the Romans prior to their
> downfall, you are so soft, you do not have the domestic stomach to fight a
> protracted war.


Leonidas Rex:

This problem with protracted war has been recognized as a weakness of
democracies since the time of the classical Greek philosophers. But the
downfall of Rome was caused by infiltration be jews after the Diaspora. The
jews bought their way into the inner circles of Roman society as rich
trans-Mediterranean grain merchants. By the way, guess who owns Cargil, the
company that has a headlock on United States grain export. Some things
never change.



> The moms and dads of America have been betrayed so often by the
> pro-Zionist US Government, that they will never allow an unwilling son or
> daughter to go to the slaughter again whilst the likes of Bush bug out by
> joining the national Guard only to shirk even that duty.


Leonidas Rex:

The National Guard and the Reserve were for the protection of the United
States of America from invasion, and people joined with that in mind. For
the Guard and Reserve to be used for military adventuring of the "jew
imperative" kind would be a gross act of betrail if the anti-White race
murdering jews were not doing it. The only thing keeping Guard and Reserve
enlistments from dwindling to nothing is the jew control of the mass mind
of Whiteness.



> My personal opinion is that Bush will use this scandal to turn tail and
> run from the mess he has made in Iraq and leave the UN to clean it up,
> there will be years of bloodshed until the majority tribe takes over and a
> new Saddam Hussein is installed.


Leonidas Rex:

If only you were correct. Unfortunately the United States Military Machine
is hardening its camp infrastructure for the long haul. A long haul that
the Disunited States of Jewmerica can not afford financially or in any
other way. But the dog tail that is the jews needn't care. They will get
what they want over our dead bodies.


> Just remember sweetie, the Vietcong and NVA wopped your ass with fewer
> soldiers and comparatively stone age weapons, so don't get too
> cocky....mmmkay?


Leonidas Rex:

When a combat soldier in Viet Nam I could tell what NVA weaponry came from
China and what NVA weaponry came from Russia. The Chinese favored sheet
metal while the Russians favored metal castings. The Chinese favored tan
paint while the Russians favored black paint. Not stone age weaponry by any
means.
-

Werewolfy

unread,
May 19, 2004, 7:45:53 PM5/19/04
to
"Gassen Burnham" <gassen_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<40a9597c$1...@127.0.0.1>...
================================================================================

Well, that will teach me to read all of the message first I suppose.

I just smiled at the 'apple pie etc' metaphor.

I'm not smiling now. Not now that I know you are one of those
detestable Nazi racial-hating bastards.

Actually, I didn't even see your name in it's true light until you
explained.

I have no words to describe you. If I could, I would hang you
myself..along with the other members of your anti Jewish cult.

Sorry apn readers...I didn't realise...should have, but didn't. This
poster is scum...pure and simple scum.

Werewolfy

0 new messages