LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Brimstone
by VALERIE HILDEBEITEL, The Morning Call
A Lehigh County deputy sheriff has filed harassment charges
against an Allentown attorney over a courthouse confrontation
that happened last month, Sheriff Ron Neimeyer has confirmed.
The charges against attorney Yale F. Edeiken were filed in the
district attorney's office Wednesday, according to the deputy
involved.
Deputy Brenda Hartman said Edeiken shoved her as she was taking
a female prisoner from a courtroom to a holding cell to await
probation processing on the afternoon of June 12.
Hartman said she took the prisoner into an elevator and Edeiken
and another man followed.
The deputy said Edeiken confronted the man, who was later
identified as the woman's ex-husband, and she ordered both to
stop and that one man leave the elevator.
The ex-husband complied and as he exited, Hartman said, Edeiken
shoved her to the back of the elevator and swung his briefcase
at the man.
Sheriff Neimeyer said the deputy reported the incident to him,
and he sent her to the district attorney's office.
"It certainly was conduct that is not expected," Neimeyer said
Friday. "We're on the same side. My officers are officers of the
court, as is Mr. Edeiken.
"We won't brook that type of conduct from anyone else," the
sheriff said. "Why should we (take it) from him?"
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Doc Tavish
Looks like scab Edeiken's legal troubles are starting to really come down
upon him. I wouldn't want to be in his shoes at all! I am glad to know that
others and especially at his end see how rude he really is. BTW have you noticed
that his usual troll supporters are now distancing themselves from this
Titanic of the legal system. To me its handwriting on the wall that he is about
to be sunk!
My health may be bad but I do see many rays of sunshine. Perhaps
Yale F. Edeiken will threaten you with litigation for posting this. If he does
please let me know. I have been requested to provide evidence that
Edeiken has a pattern of threatening litigation against those he wishes
to malign or intimidate. The above story proves that this person is noxious.
Doc Tavish
Mike Kalvatis OBC
about Yale's slander and abuse.
On Tue, 04 Apr 2000 21:44:29 -0700, Brimstone
<mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
RiP
And this could be what is known as a 'Sunday punch' after
Yale's recent multiply postings of his whinning about being sent a
theatening e-mail!
Yale seems to have gotten off rather easily if a fine plus costs was
all that was assessed against him. It is possible he was also ordered
by the court to undergo psychological treatment for his violent
proclivities. He needs it!!!
First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and now
Yale!
Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
research? Nizkookians are weird!
RiP
Yale F. Edeiken
RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote in message
news:7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com...
> Yup!!! This story and the other one 'kicks Yale's ass!'
> And this could be what is known as a 'Sunday punch' after
> Yale's recent multiply postings of his whinning about being sent a
> theatening e-mail!
> Yale seems to have gotten off rather easily if a fine plus costs was
> all that was assessed against him. It is possible he was also ordered
> by the court to undergo psychological treatment for his violent
> proclivities. He needs it!!!
Actually the charges were dismissed by a judge.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Mike Kalvatis OBC
to try that crap with a real man.
On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>Yup!!! This story and the other one 'kicks Yale's ass!'
>And this could be what is known as a 'Sunday punch' after
>Yale's recent multiply postings of his whinning about being sent a
>theatening e-mail!
>
>Yale seems to have gotten off rather easily if a fine plus costs was
>all that was assessed against him. It is possible he was also ordered
>by the court to undergo psychological treatment for his violent
>proclivities. He needs it!!!
>
RiP
wrote:
Oh! Okay then:
1.You got your gun permit reinstated.
2. Your $600.00 fine plus costs was returned to you.
3. Any additional requirements imposed on you by the courts were
rescinded.
4. The newspaper(s) that carried this story printed the follow up on a
prominent page that the charges were dismissed.
5. The Sheriff's department apologized for causing you an
inconvenience.
RiP
Philip Mathews
>Mike Kalvatis OBC ex...@nospam.com
wrote:
>And Yale had to go after a woman for all things. He ain't man enough
>to try that crap with a real man.
All talk.
(snip)
Go shed your skin.
--
Philip Mathews
On February 1, 1999 David E. Michael said:
If they are so innocent and inoffensive, why have they been reviled and
loathed throughout history in a wide variety of circumstances? There are at
least some aspects of Jewish culture that do, I'm afraid, tend to invite
bitterness. Having been resoundingly stabbed in the back by one whom I liked
and trusted, at a time when I was a lot more favourably disposed to these
people, I assure you that I speak from personal experience.
"Mankind have a great aversion to intellectual labor; but even supposing
knowledge to be easily attainable, more people would be content to be ignorant
than would take even a little trouble to acquire it." Samuel Johnson
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
[snip]
>First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
>now Yale!
Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the date
of the article:
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
Page: B02
Edition: FIFTH
Section: LOCAL/REGION
>Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
>research? Nizkookians are weird!
So you think this is Revisionist research, do you? I guess some
Revisionists can use a web page search engine.
Whether it is research related to the Holocaust, I'd have to say you
don't have as to which clue you're missing.
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOub/5QgvG272fn9EQKqoACgpgvJ7X59BHn06imoAkeMxw47M5UAoNzf
Gj9P1NpTMjMADDVINoUg4oUM
=dIKj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RiP
<John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
>on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
>[snip]
>
>>First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
>>now Yale!
>
>Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the date
>of the article:
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
> Page: B02
> Edition: FIFTH
> Section: LOCAL/REGION
And why do you think the date is relevant?
Even eighty year old retired immigrant pensioners lose their
citizenship because they were guards at certain prison camps almost
sixty years ago!
>
>>Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
>>research? Nizkookians are weird!
>
>So you think this is Revisionist research, do you? I guess some
>Revisionists can use a web page search engine.
What is wrong with that?????
>Whether it is research related to the Holocaust, I'd have to say you
>don't have as to which clue you're missing.
Hmmm....looks like your grammatical sentence structure is really
suckin' today John!
>........don't have as to which clue you're missing.
Oh boy!
RiP
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <2ianess0j5lj33jt1...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 17:15:32 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:03:50 GMT, John Morris
><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>>In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
>>on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>>[snip]
>>>First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
>>>now Yale!
>>Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the
>>date of the article:
>> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
>> Page: B02
>> Edition: FIFTH
>> Section: LOCAL/REGION
>And why do you think the date is relevant?
Because you said "now" as if were a recent incident. Which is the
impression Ellis wanted to create.
And like a good Revisionist researcher, you fell for it.
>Even eighty year old retired immigrant pensioners lose their
>citizenship because they were guards at certain prison camps almost
>sixty years ago!
Yes. Then they are deported, and then they stand trial. Looks as if
Yale had his day in court eleven years ago.
>>>Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
>>>research? Nizkookians are weird!
>>So you think this is Revisionist research, do you? I guess some
>>Revisionists can use a web page search engine.
>What is wrong with that?????
You guys sure can't take a compliment, can you? Sheesh.
>>Whether it is research related to the Holocaust, I'd have to say
>>you don't have as to which clue you're missing.
>Hmmm....looks like your grammatical sentence structure is really
>suckin' today John!
>>........don't have as to which clue you're missing.
>Oh boy!
Sorry. I think faster than I type.
"You don't have a clue as to which clue you are missing."
Yup. Love that Revisionist "research."
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOu4kZQgvG272fn9EQK4NACgnMTULlG12HUZwJEb1ldpgP/1s4UAni/A
sh6xbG6LFXL6Vg6GH+mgUwCF
=xqVV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RiP
<John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>In <2ianess0j5lj33jt1...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
>on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 17:15:32 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 20:03:50 GMT, John Morris
>><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>
>>>In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
>>>on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
>>>[snip]
>
>>>>First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
>>>>now Yale!
>
>>>Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the
>>>date of the article:
>
>>> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
>>> Page: B02
>>> Edition: FIFTH
>>> Section: LOCAL/REGION
>
>>And why do you think the date is relevant?
>
>Because you said "now" as if were a recent incident. Which is the
>impression Ellis wanted to create.
No John, (sigh..) the posting is recent. That is what the 'now' refers
to, the recent posting of the story on Yale. It was just posted today,
April 5.
I believe the story about Ragland was posted last week.
"First the story about Ragland and now the story about Yale."
Can't you see that John? Work on it.
>
>And like a good Revisionist researcher, you fell for it.
Gosh you are really stupid today!
>
>>Even eighty year old retired immigrant pensioners lose their
>>citizenship because they were guards at certain prison camps almost
>>sixty years ago!
>
>Yes. Then they are deported, and then they stand trial. Looks as if
>Yale had his day in court eleven years ago.
>
>>>>Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
>>>>research? Nizkookians are weird!
>
>>>So you think this is Revisionist research, do you? I guess some
>>>Revisionists can use a web page search engine.
>
>>What is wrong with that?????
>
>You guys sure can't take a compliment, can you? Sheesh.
So you admit you were impressed with Ellis finding the story about
Yale?
>
>>>Whether it is research related to the Holocaust, I'd have to say
>>>you don't have as to which clue you're missing.
>
>>Hmmm....looks like your grammatical sentence structure is really
>>suckin' today John!
>>>........don't have as to which clue you're missing.
>
>>Oh boy!
>
>Sorry. I think faster than I type.
>
>"You don't have a clue as to which clue you are missing."
Better sentence structure but your premise is still stupid.
>
>Yup. Love that Revisionist "research."
RiP
Warren's All-Stars
Mike Kalvatis OBC wrote:
> And Yale had to go after a woman for all things. He ain't man enough
> to try that crap with a real man.
Coming from Mikey, the harrasser of women and children, this is rich. By the way,
Mikey, how's Al?
Steve
>
>
> On Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
> >Yup!!! This story and the other one 'kicks Yale's ass!'
> >And this could be what is known as a 'Sunday punch' after
> >Yale's recent multiply postings of his whinning about being sent a
> >theatening e-mail!
> >
> >Yale seems to have gotten off rather easily if a fine plus costs was
> >all that was assessed against him. It is possible he was also ordered
> >by the court to undergo psychological treatment for his violent
> >proclivities. He needs it!!!
> >
> >First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and now
> >Yale!
> >
> >Where does McVay get the absurd idea that revisionists can't do
> >research? Nizkookians are weird!
> >
Marty in Osaka
Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
> LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
[rest of article snipped]
The charges in this eleven-year-old case were dismissed.
And...well....What exactly does this have to do with the Holocaust?
Marty Kelley
Faculty of Language and Culture
Osaka University
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
Doc Tavish
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
Organization: University of Alberta
Reply-To: John....@UAlberta.CA
Message-ID: <1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>
> In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
> on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal and
> >now Yale!
> Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the date
> of the article:
>
> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
> Page: B02
> Edition: FIFTH
> Section: LOCAL/REGION
Thanks for verifying the authenticity of the article John. Doesn't matter
to me the date it occured. It establishes that Edeiken gives in to fits
of rage and that is good enough for me as well as any trial held against him.
His history is admissable evidence too you should know!
Lurkers here is the article:
LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
by VALERIE HILDEBEITEL, The Morning Call
---end of article---
Care to verify that this article is authentic as well John?
CITY ATTORNEY FOUND GUILTY IN ELEVATOR CONFRONTATION
by KRISTIN CASLER, The Morning Call
Allentown attorney Yale F. Edeiken was found guilty and fined
$600 plus costs for a confrontation with a Lehigh County deputy
sheriff and another man in a courthouse elevator.
During the June 12 incident, Edeiken struck Deputy Brenda
Hartman with his briefcase and allegedly threatened the man by
saying he had a gun, according to District Justice Diane Jepsen,
who heard the case. Edeiken later was found to have a permit for
and was carrying a .357 Magnum.
Jepsen ordered Edeiken, whose office is at 39 N. 5th St., to pay
the fine after a hearing Monday on charges of harassment and
disorderly conduct filed by Hartman. Jepsen said Edeiken no
longer has a permit for his gun.
According to the complaint, Hartman was in the courthouse side
elevator, which usually is reserved for prisoner transport, with
Joanne Keller. Keller, who was not handcuffed, had just been
sentenced and Hartman was taking her to pay fines and costs
before her release.
Also on the elevator were Edeiken, David Raymond, public
defender Earl Supplee and county courier Bill Bichel.
Edeiken told Jepsen that Raymond, a convicted felon who had
burglarized him, pushed his way onto the elevator.
But Jepsen said other witnesses testified that Raymond already
was on the elevator when Edeiken boarded and started a shoving
match. Witnesses varied on what was said.
Witnesses said Edeiken called Hartman a whore, but Edeiken said
he was referring to Keller.
Raymond is a friend of Keller, and Keller once resided at a
house owned by Edeiken. Edeiken was at the courthouse as a
character witness for Keller at her sentencing.
Edeiken swung his briefcase at Raymond, striking him and
Hartman, according to testimony.
Hartman opened the elevator doors on the third floor and ordered
Edeiken to get out. He refused, and as Raymond attempted to
exit, Edeiken told Raymond he had a gun and moved as if he was
going to draw it. No weapon was seen.
Raymond and Supplee then went downstairs for help, and Hartman
took Edeiken and Keller to the bullpen where prisoners are held
pending their proceedings, Jepsen said. Hartman told them to
stay until she got help. When she returned, Edeiken was gone.
---end of article---
Thus we have established the legend of Yale "Mad Dog" Edeiken
the terror of the Lehigh County Courthouse!
Need I say more? hehehehe
Doc Tavish
John Morris
Hash: SHA1
In <8cgk8...@news1.newsguy.com> in alt.revisionism, on Thu, 6 Apr
2000 00:03:52 GMT, "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
>Message-ID: <1f6neso4j4ujdp6q7...@4ax.com>
>> In <7remes8f7fgvc8lq0...@4ax.com> in
>> alt.revisionism, on Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:17:26 -0400, RiP
>> <Ri...@up.com> wrote:
>> [snip]
>> >First it was Ragland who made the 'funny papers' as a criminal
>> >and now Yale!
>> Now? There's one little part "Brimstone" forgot to include, the
>> date of the article:
>> Date: Wednesday, September 19, 1990
>> Page: B02
>> Edition: FIFTH
>> Section: LOCAL/REGION
>Thanks for verifying the authenticity of the article John.
And later today you, or one of the thugs who are using you, will call
me a liar.
> Doesn't matter
>to me the date it occured.
It won't matter to the court which has already assessed costs
against. They won't even consider it.
> It establishes that Edeiken gives in to fits
>of rage and that is good enough for me as well as any trial held
>against him.
It's good enough for you because you are silly enough to believe that
you can win a court case in a Usenet newsgroup.
>His history is admissable evidence too you should know!
You delude yourself if you wish--you have done nothing else so
far--but the court is not going to consider it.
>Lurkers here is the article:
>LEHIGH DEPUTY SAYS LAWYER HARASSED HER IN SHOVING INCIDENT
[snip]
>Thus we have established the legend of Yale "Mad Dog" Edeiken
>the terror of the Lehigh County Courthouse!
>Need I say more? hehehehe
There are things you could say.
First: "Dear Mr. Edeiken, A certified cheque for your costs has been
forwarded to the Lehigh County Court clerk's office. Please accept
my humble apologies."
Second: "Dear Mr. Edieken, Please direct all future correspondence to
my lawyers."
Instead what you will say is this: "Oh, look. I'm winning because
Don Ellis says I am. And Don hates Yale as much as I do, so it must
be true."
- --
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.2 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBOOv4iJQgvG272fn9EQLb0gCg0B+XB6gWfezd0im1wwB5d9MzXjcAoJju
gjidMoi7Afz5iIAXPq8U6qEr
=QEEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Joel Rosenberg
"Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>
> Thanks for verifying the authenticity of the article John. Doesn't matter
> to me the date it occured. It establishes that Edeiken gives in to fits
> of rage and that is good enough for me as well as any trial held against
him.
>
Scotty, Scotty, have you been drinking again? The charge was dismissed,
after all, ten years ago.
I think you'd better get real lawyer, and not try doing this stuff by
yourself -- it's already gotten you fined by the court.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Maybe you could ask Don Ellis to explain how to beat a
speeding ticket by asking for a jury trial.
Heeheehee.
David Gehrig
<< snip >>
> There are things you could say.
>
> First: "Dear Mr. Edeiken, A certified cheque for your costs has been
> forwarded to the Lehigh County Court clerk's office. Please accept
> my humble apologies."
>
> Second: "Dear Mr. Edieken, Please direct all future correspondence to
> my lawyers."
>
> Instead what you will say is this: "Oh, look. I'm winning because
> Don Ellis says I am. And Don hates Yale as much as I do, so it must
> be true."
Exactly. And every day he does so, he gets a day closer to that
snappy sartorial orange.
@%<
Gord McFee
21:44:29 -0700, Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid>
wrote:
> A Lehigh County deputy sheriff has filed harassment charges
> against an Allentown attorney over a courthouse confrontation
> that happened last month, Sheriff Ron Neimeyer has confirmed.
>
> The charges against attorney Yale F. Edeiken were filed in the
> district attorney's office Wednesday, according to the deputy
> involved.
And what was the verdict, asswipe?
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org