FOLKS! LOOK! YOU TOO CAN WRITE LIKE BRADBURY!!
Public <Anonymous_Account>
This includes:
- saying in 15,000 lines what c be said in 2
- spamming multiple newsgroups with nonsensical drivel
- practicing law on usenet without a license
-practicing law on usenet without a brain
-wRiTiNg in cAps ThAt mAKe No sEnSe.
---
This message did not originate from the Sender address above.
It was posted with the use of anonymizing software at
http://anon.xg.nu
---
McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>At the Bradbury School of Fine Posting, we specialize in teaching you
>the finer points of the Robert Scott Bradbury Technique (TM) of posting
>to Usenet.
>
>This includes:
>- saying in 15,000 lines what c be said in 2
>- spamming multiple newsgroups with nonsensical drivel
>- practicing law on usenet without a license
>-practicing law on usenet without a brain
>-wRiTiNg in cAps ThAt mAKe No sEnSe.
Tears you up doesn't it that I now have Yale being investigated for his
incitements to murder doesn't it?
Doesn't take a law degree to discern that Yale identified himself as
"nazihunter" in his submission to court.
Look! In his own words and with a few comments by me to highlight the
obvious!
Previously addressed to Sara Salzman which is most likely you anyway!
For a FACT and it is contained in the document that YOU and Ken McVay have
distributed all over the place in an effort to smear me Yale F. Edeiken
identified himself as "nazihunter." Everyone I've shown this to has agreed
that Yale did identify himself as "nazihunter."
Look again at this short version:
From the document being circulated known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
<<WHO IS THE PLAINTIFF SARA? YALE F. EDEIKEN!>>
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
<<WHO IS CLAIMING "Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff"?
YALE F. EDEIKEN!>>
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter."
<<WHO DID I ADDRESS MY REPLY TO? "nazihunter" WHO WAS THREATENED BY MY
REPLY TO "nazihunter" WHO JUST THE DAY BEFORE INCITED MURDER AGAINST ME?
YALE F. EDEIKEN! IF YALE IS NOT "nazihunter" THEN WHY WOULD MY REPLY TO AN
ANONYMOUS PSYCHOPATH BE A THREAT TO THE PLAINTIFF aka YALE F. EDEIKEN?>>
NOW FOR THE REAL NITTY GRITTY:
(ENHANCED)
Folks I have been thinking a lot about Yale F. Edeiken's "admission" and
him identifying himself as "nazihunter" of December 1999. I just
remembered this very relevant post which I wish to pass on to you all and
I will make some comments on it too that should be very telling! The
pieces are starting to fall into place!
LOOK!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=nazihunter=&rnum=1&seld=993796963&ic=1
From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com)
Subject: Tubby Edeiken's Dirty Deeds and Nasty Telephone Manners aka Re:
Give it up Edeiken, Tavish ain't playing your childish game.
Date: 2000-08-29 22:40:39 PST
EXCERPT
[...]
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH
Date: 12/16/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
Fergus McClelland <re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote in message
news:Y59ZOCTA79oElx...@4ax.com...
> kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
> >In article <38585078...@mindspring.com>,
> >Buck Turgidson <depnos...@YOmindspriing.conOY> wrote:
> >>C'mon, Nazihunter, fair's fair. What's your name and where do you live?
> >>Sauce for the goose, you prick.
> >To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
> >address in the first place, shouldn't one?
> Yes.
> >Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list,
> >and to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to
> >condemn nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask
> >what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first
> >place?
> Yes.
To assit others who were the victims of his criminal behavior. This
included all but one person who received the address.
[...]
> Nazihunter has no such mitigation.
Then obviously you know who he is since you are sure that he has not
received death threats from Bradbury or that Bradbury has not filed false
police reports about him.
If so, it's time to fees up.
--YFE
~~End of DejaCom Archival Extract Contained in new GOOGLE Archive~~
New revelations on March 17, 2001 concerning the above:
1) Regarding the statement: "To be fair, one should also ask how
nazihunter got the name and address in the first place, shouldn't one?"
The question is finally answered in the next set of proofs from
Yale F. Edeiken's "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED
ADMITTED", being propagated as TRUTH, in which he "admits" he was
"nazihunter" in December 1999!
2) Regarding the statement: "If you are going to condemn nazihunter, as
you properly are, then should you not also ask what Yale hoped to achieve
by distributing the address in the first place?"
Seeing how Yale F. Edeiken was "nazihunter" he had hoped to achieve
intimidating me into silence with his death threats and he thought if
enough of his accomplices would post my identity and the personal
information he obtained using a subpoena I would be intimidated into
leaving USENET as others have done when treated similarly. Yale F. Edeiken
as "nazihunter" did post these gloating words a day after his posting my
real name, address, telephone number and the invitation to visit me with
baseball bats: "On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he seems to have
disappeared. Has he fled? Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?"
The word "visit" had to be in reference to Yale's incitement that I be
murdered when he posted these words just a day before: "Why not call him
and tell him what a nazi prick he is. Better yet, why not visit him.....
..with a baseball bat."
Clearly an attempt to intimidate me into silence through a criminal death
threat and incitation to murder by other parties! This is how the DA and
law enforcement see the criminal act against me.
3) Regarding Yale F. Edeiken's answer to: "Nazihunter has no such
mitigation" Edeiken replied: "Then obviously you know who he is since you
are sure that he has not received death threats from Bradbury or that
Bradbury has not filed false police reports about him."
How on Earth could I make death threats or file false police reports
against an anonymous criminal who just the day before incited murder
against me? Also why would Yale F. Edeiken be offended about anything I
said about "nazihunter"? It is because Yale F. Edeiken was "nazihunter"!
Yale F. Edeiken had whined numerous times that I had filed false police
reports against him, Yale F. Edeiken!
LOOK!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=police=&rnum=5&seld=946318434&ic=1
Subject: Re: Yale F. Edeiken Shows His Mental State and Honesty (For The
Records Folks)
Date: 01/01/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
(Notice how Yale was threatening me back in Jan 2000)
[...]
> > ..This campaign included calling the police and other attorneys in my area.
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 12/21/1999
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:385C747A...@btinternet.com...
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
> > > > This campaign included calling the police and
> > > > other attorneys in my area. You did nothing but encourage him.
<END>
Yes, Yale cried and wailed about me allegedly contacting the police in his
area as well as attorneys BUT for a fact- I had not done such at that time
and only within the past few days have I notified the authorities and some
law offices in Allentown showing them factually that Yale F. Edeiken
criminally harasses people! Further proof in the next section!
4) In regard to Yale's statement: "..it's time to fees up."
Yes, you're correct Yale and it is now time for you to be indicted and
convicted for your criminal misuse of the legal system. If I can have you
successfully prosecuted for your brazen criminal acts against me then we
will consider what the future holds for the values of your assets and how
much I am entitled to! As you said criminal: "..it's time to fees up."
MOVING ON TO YALE'S CRITICAL ADMISSION HE MADE TO JUDGE REIBMAN:
<START>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION -- LAW
YALE F. EDEIKEN :
:
Plaintiff :
:
vs. : No. 99-C- 2786
:
SCOTT BRADBURY a/k/a "DOC TAVISH"
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
[...]
Respectfully submitted,
________________________
Yale F. Edeiken
c/o Trainor Law Offices (Paul E. Trainor)
1720 Fairmont Street
Allentown PA 18104
Phone: (610) 434-7004
Fax: (610) 434-6978
<end>
The above is verbatim from the complaint from a frivolous lawsuit filed
against me by an attorney who has engaged in criminal acts against me as I
will prove.
FACT: Notice in the complaint that the plaintiff is identified as
Yale F. Edeiken who then identifies himself as "nazihunter" as follows:
<start> (From the above complaint)
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side"
<stop>
In the above complaint the Plaintiff, Yale F. Edeiken, identified himself
as being the recipient of the above "threat." I merely replied to an
anonymous psychopath who just a day earlier posted my address and
telephone number under the pseudonym of "nazihunter" with the invitation
that I be visited with baseball bats!
Here is the post in full context. (Please note that all posts are on file
with law enforcement and with my attorney and they are exact copies with
my address and telephone number intact. In these public postings I delete
what Yale F. Edeiken posted.)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=TAVISH=&rnum=2&seld=933951028&ic=1
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Compare the text and note that Yale F. Edeiken has in FACT identified
himself as being "nazihunter." Here is the post which Yale F. Edeiken as
"nazihunter" was gloating about above in his vain attempt to intimidate me
into silence through a criminal death threat:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Nazihunter=rnum=4&seld=993796963&ic=1
<START Google Archival Excerpt>
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
~~End of Post~~
See the death threat? See that it was from the same pseudonym the
Plaintiff, Yale F. Edeiken, identified himself as being? Take note of the
time and date of the archive! The critical points are:
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Organization: cotse
[...]
All of the above criminal harassment happened because a mentally disturbed
attorney obtained my unlisted address and unlisted telephone number by use
of a subpoena as shown here:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading:
Yale F. Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding:
"(1) Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net.. This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290.. November 30,1999 Return address: Yale F. Edeiken, 918 North Bayard
Street; Allentown, PA 18104." (Subpoena on file with my attorney, Flash
Net, and law enforcement) [For the record the subpoena does NOT appear on
the docket- rather my confidential info went directly to one of
Yale F. Edeiken's "drops." The FACT that the subpoena never made it to
the docket means that my confidential info (unlisted telephone number and
address) was not public knowledge nor available for the public to view-
the subpoena went directly to Yale F. Edeiken who, on his own, distributed
confidential information obtained using a subpoena.]
Yale F. Edeiken had a subpoena issued on November 30, 1999 and sent it
from Allentown, Pennsylvania to Flash Net in Dallas, Texas. The travel
time and turnaround would be reasonable to assume that Yale F. Edeiken
received my confidential info on about December 14, 1999! I ask what are
the odds that another person other than Yale F. Edeiken would be using the
COTSE anonymizer in a small time frame on the night of December 14, 1999
to violate my right to privacy!? Yale F. Edeiken did in FACT identify
himself as the plaintiff and that the plaintiff was threatened
(personally) when I replied to "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>.
----
Now I would like for all concerned to answer these questions:
1) Who is identified as the plaintiff in 1999-C-2786?
2) Who identified himself as the recipient of: "I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing
behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing
the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side" which he said in his
own words: "On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following threat
to Plaintiff"?
3) Given that the answer to question number ONE is also the answer to
question number TWO I ask: Who identified himself as "nazihunter"- the
recipient of my reply to an anonymous post?
All three questions have the same answer! I posed the same questions to my
local District Attorney and he got the answers correct.
Now I ask what are the odds that another entirely different person would
also acquire my unlisted telephone number and address and be posting it on
the night of the December 14, 1999 to be archived by DejaCom within a very
narrow time frame?
-----------------
Here is more activity from Yale F. Edeiken on the night of
December 14, 1999 and take note of the times the archives
were made by DejaCom:
Concerning being ARRESTED:
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: We Want Porn Please Add Us to Your Lists!
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3856...@news3.enter.net>
References: <82rla9$f...@sirius.infonex.com>
<82s6km$444$2...@dosa.alt.net>
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: atmax-4-5.enter.net
X-Trace: 14 Dec 1999 14:38:06 -0500, atmax-4-5.enter.net
[more false accusations linking to an anonymous post deleted]
You will be interested to learn that a civil suit has already been
filed and a warrant for his arrest is about to be issued.
--YFE
~~~End of Archival Excerpt~~
Now notice on the night of December 14, 1999 that the same COTSE
re-mailer was used to post the following. Notice that the abusive posts
meant to incite that I be criminally harassed mention me being
arrested! What are the odds that two people would be announcing I was
to be arrested and all within the same time frame that "nazihunter" aka
Yale F. Edeiken made his invitation to murder?
From: "Bradbury MacTavish" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Tavish's widdle dickie needs a lickin
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com>
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: soc.culture.usa
Anonymously posted.
Hello to all of my friends and fans out there! Once again,
as the holidays approach, my widdle dickie feels the need
of your attention.
Won't you come and visit my widdle dickie, before Bubba
makes me his and his alone, like before I get arrested?
I live at <address and telephone number deleted by me>,
but if you are not able to put your lips on widdle dickie
in person, call me for phone sex, at <address and telephone
number deleted by me> and we'll get it on...
----------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 20:28:32 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <1999121501...@cotse.com>
From: "Scott Bradbury" <anon...@cotse.com>
Subject: Please suck my tiny dick as a holiday gift
Newsgroups: alt.politics.nationalism.white
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Lines: 27
Anonymously posted.
My name is Scott Bradbury ..... my adoring and sometimes
sniveling fans know me as "Doc Tavish."
I have a difficult problem. I am about to be arrested,
which means only this guy named Billy Bob will be sucking
my tiny dick.
I don't know when I'm going to be jailed, but the warrant's
been issued... even my close friend and sometimes-lover Fat
Harold won't be able to cuddle my tiny dick then...
Will you show your affection now, by sucking my tiny dick
before I am arrested?
I live in Texas, you know..... where we grow really big
mouths and really small dicks. I live at <address and
telephone number deleted by me> if you can't suck my tiny
dick in person, can we have phone sex instead? I sure hope
so, because you won't be able to reach me at <address and
telephone number deleted by me> much longer!
--------------------------------------------------------------
Compare the dates and times in the anonymous postings mentioning me being
arrested with what Yale F. Edeiken claimed and all this time I believed
that Yale and the Nazihunter in the above posts were two separate people
but now it appears that the Nazihunter above was actually Yale F. Edeiken!
I finally realized Yale F. Edeiken was "nazihunter" when Ken McVay,
director of Nizkor, posted Yale F. Edeiken's "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
The chances that two separate people would have obtained my unlisted
address and telephone number and be posting them with incitements to
harassment and incitements to murder are ASTRONOMICAL and afterall
Yale F. Edeiken did identify himself as being "nazihunter" of December
1999.
The chances that two separate people would also be posting on the night of
December 14, 1999 in the wee hours of the night that I will be arrested
are also ASTRONOMICAL!!
Regarding inviting people to visit someone with baseball bats another
attorney from misc.legal said this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tauger=&rnum=1&seld=935748656&ic=1
"Posting someone's name, address and telephone number, along with an
invitation to visit them with baseball bats sounds fairly close to recent
case in which an a prolife group posted the names of doctors who performed
abortions along with what the court found was tantamount to an invitation
to murder them." Paul Tauger - Attorney January 23, 2001
Doc Tavish
---
To see ugliness and filthiness perfected just click this link:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3-4.gif
The beast is "SOW" Salzman.
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
8yl634yHG40xC/MIhlkaUHL8GcnkRJtT2odFJGqa
4xj3MsHqMSsYdHUXJChcE/ryYh2c+kUx6ktYkmv4C
Sara
DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
> --
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:23:35 -0600, "Public <Anonymous_Account>"
> <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>
> >At the Bradbury School of Fine Posting, we specialize in teaching you
> >the finer points of the Robert Scott Bradbury Technique (TM) of posting
> >to Usenet.
> >
> >This includes:
> >- saying in 15,000 lines what c be said in 2
> >- spamming multiple newsgroups with nonsensical drivel
> >- practicing law on usenet without a license
> >-practicing law on usenet without a brain
> >-wRiTiNg in cAps ThAt mAKe No sEnSe.
>
> Tears you up doesn't it that I now have Yale being investigated for his
> incitements to murder doesn't it?
Investigated by whom? There's no investigation and you know it.
>
> Doesn't take a law degree to discern that Yale identified himself as
> "nazihunter" in his submission to court.
You're still lying, Mr. Bradbury.
>
> Look! In his own words and with a few comments by me to highlight the
> obvious!
>
> Previously addressed to Sara Salzman which is most likely you anyway!
Are you accusing me? If so, file charges NOW and prove it. I have never
posted anonymously and you know it, Liar.
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
On 20 Mar 2001 00:30:56 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <8tqcbt4p9ngm08ivd...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>> --
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:23:35 -0600, "Public <Anonymous_Account>"
>> <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>>
>> >At the Bradbury School of Fine Posting, we specialize in teaching you
>> >the finer points of the Robert Scott Bradbury Technique (TM) of posting
>> >to Usenet.
>> >
>> >This includes:
>> >- saying in 15,000 lines what c be said in 2
>> >- spamming multiple newsgroups with nonsensical drivel
>> >- practicing law on usenet without a license
>> >-practicing law on usenet without a brain
>> >-wRiTiNg in cAps ThAt mAKe No sEnSe.
>> Tears you up doesn't it that I now have Yale being investigated for his
>> incitements to murder doesn't it?
>Investigated by whom? There's no investigation and you know it.
You are in for a very rude awakening. The case has already been added to
the task load for the detectives working through the DA's office. I filed
last week and the detective said due to the work load it would take about
10 to 14 days for them to get to it. There are only three detectives! It
is in the "cache" so to speak!
>> Doesn't take a law degree to discern that Yale identified himself as
>> "nazihunter" in his submission to court.
>You're still lying, Mr. Bradbury.
How is that Sara? Yale plainly identified himself as the plaintiff and
that I had threatened him when I had replied to "nazihunter." I read
Detective Hilbert what Edeiken "said" and he says if the text read by me
over thee telephone is verified then Edeiken is in trouble and what he did
was a criminal offense. The detective took it that Edeiken also implicated
himself as "nazihunter." My attorney was sent a copy of my proofs and it
was he who gave me names and telephone numbers and told me to officially
file criminal charges against Edeiken with both the District Attorney and
District Justice (evidently he also took it Edeiken implicated himself as
being nazihunter and as I have said- everyone who has seen my proofs sees
that Yale implicated himself!).
Once again what I have posted and this is the short version:
From the document being circulated known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<end>
Now for a reading comprehension test because we all know you are stupid
and these questions should be simple enough for you!
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing
Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b" Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Only the staunch Edeikenites are in denial.
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
Did another attorney named Paul Tauger post this concerning posts such as
the above:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tauger=&rnum=1&seld=935748656&ic=1
"Posting someone's name, address and telephone number, along with an
invitation to visit them with baseball bats sounds fairly close to recent
case in which an a prolife group posted the names of doctors who performed
abortions along with what the court found was tantamount to an invitation
to murder them." Paul Tauger - Attorney January 23, 2001
I think Yale would probably look quite dapper in an orange jump suit and
for that matter you just may be fitted with one yourself perjurer!
Believe me I am putting forth my best efforts! :->
>> Look! In his own words and with a few comments by me to highlight the
>> obvious!
>>
>> Previously addressed to Sara Salzman which is most likely you anyway!
>Are you accusing me? If so, file charges NOW and prove it.
I am accusing you of perjury and accusing Edeiken of incitement to murder
among other things.
>I have never posted anonymously and you know it, Liar.
Yes you have and YOU know it. I will prove so in all due time!
Doc Tavish
>Sara
---
"If you stop fabricating lies about me, I will stop disclosing the
truth about you." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ck6sBn9PjZ5TPOlpGYXaEK1KBnq3J9+Gdpc20yPy
4DQNFcgIg+k/GGSrT8GFF94iA81sGUWmqjgy/nUcw
Sara
DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
Mr Bradbury:
Please ask your attorney to explain the following terms to you:
"Predicate act"
"criminal enterprise"
"RICO"
And then you might aslk him why he compared you to Adolf Eichmann in
open court.
McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
On 20 Mar 2001 03:15:31 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <2rfdbt86beprn56lo...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>
>Mr Bradbury:
>
>Please ask your attorney to explain the following terms to you:
>
>"Predicate act"
>
>"criminal enterprise"
>
>"RICO"
Those terms could apply to you, Yale, Joel Rosenberg, and Yale's Canadian
pal because you all have engaged in criminal acts in unison to harass me.
>And then you might aslk him why he compared you to Adolf Eichmann in
>open court.
So you say perjurer! So you say!
Doc Tavish
>Sara
---
"If you stop fabricating lies about me, I will stop disclosing the
truth about you." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
hadreoWnHSzmbEt5nPipTCnRkHKMMcDGNMHFW/Gd
46hUwVGvE+dLCFXLwPJ4IvWeJ0DWU8Kn+9vQahbp3
McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
>In article <2rfdbt86beprn56lo...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>
>Mr Bradbury:
>
>Please ask your attorney to explain the following terms to you:
>
>"Predicate act"
>
>"criminal enterprise"
>
>"RICO"
Those terms could apply to you, Yale, Joel Rosenberg, and Yale's Canadian
pal because you all have engaged in criminal acts in unison to harass me.
>And then you might aslk him why he compared you to Adolf Eichmann in
>open court.
So you say perjurer! So you say! I thought he accused Yale F. Edeiken of
being Joseph Stalin! :-)
BTW I actually believe some things you claimed in your sworn testimony.
I can picture my attorney or anyone else with a reasoning mind telling a
squealing sow such stuff as: "Daylin Leach said that Deponent should "stop
bothering" Defendant Bradbury... Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot."
Aren't those more or less the same words other law enforcement agencies
told you squealing sow?
I remember that e-zine article in which you squealed like a pathetic sow
too!
Here's a reminder of what others have told you:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Sara=&rnum=1&seld=956257986&ic=1
"Sara Salzman's Holocaustria"
Subject: HOLOCAUSTRIA -- Newly Described Mental Disorder Jews Are
Afflicted With.
Date: 08/27/2000
Author: Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com>
Please note that all comments by Doc Tavish will be in all caps. I'm not
shouting-- I just want my comments to be understood as being separate from
the quoted material. All links active August 27, 2000.
On Sun, 27 Aug 2000 02:36:09 -0400, "Rev-White Ministries"
<pat_bl...@excite.com.X> wrote:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3-4.gif
(HOW GRUESOME!)
I just loaded an abbreviated version of the above URL
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/
and I saw the selection:
(FAIR USE INTENDED)
P.S. I Hate You
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3.html/page1.html Her
great-grandparents died in the Holocaust.
But Sara Salzman knows that anti-Semitism lives on --
on the Web. By Julie Jargon
That article has a lot of leftist innuendo to it and I noticed some very
valid points the squealing sow and her swine cousin Tubby Edeiken wouldn't
wish to accept!
I saw among other things:
"Although Salzman was trusting at first, even naive, about how her views
on the Holocaust would be received, she's decided not to back down against
whomever is posting the messages; she remains a frequent contributor to
alt.revisionism. But her attempts to find out who is harassing her and her
requests for police help have been unsuccessful, and she now faces the
same kind of hatred and fear that her great-grandparents did."
"The family's three birds squawk loudly and often, and their two dogs race
around, but the noise is so much a part of the background buzz that
Salzman and her husband hardly notice. They light one cigarette after
another and continue talking about the dark cloud that has been hanging
over this home for the past six months."
"Upstairs in Salzman's home office, she has saved printouts of the
hundreds of messages that have been posted about her: "Sara Salzman is a
dyke"; "Dog fucker Sara Salzman"; "Is dog fucking a Jewish thing?" and on
and on. Messages like those were posted not only to alt.revisionism, but
to dog news groups and white-power news groups."
"I work on the Web, so essentially, these people were going into my
workplace and saying terrible things about me," says Salzman.."
I GUESS THE FOOTY LADS aka UK Trolls ARE HER WELCOMED GUESTS!
"The author of a June 5, 1998, Wired News article described Ellis as "one
of the most vociferous opponents of abortion and homosexual rights on IRC
[Internet Relay Chat] and the Web."
THIS UPSETS SARA? SARA MUST BE FOR ABORTION AND HOMOSEXUAL RIGHTS. NO
WONDER WHY THEY ADORE HER SO MUCH!
"Salzman turned to Mike Castro of the FBI's Domestic Terrorism Unit in
Colorado, but according to Salzman, he said there wasn't anything he could
do to help her because there were no specific threats against her at the
time."
"Salzman has contacted the Jewish Federation, the Anti-Defamation League
and an organization called Women Halting On-Line Abuse. None have been of
any help. "They all said that what's happening is terrible," Salzman says.
But just as law-enforcement officials did, they said they couldn't help
because no overt threats had been made. The latter group, she adds,
advised her to stop posting to alt.revisionism and to change her name and
move. She has also contacted private attorneys in Colorado, but none have
committed to helping her."
I HAVE A BIG TEAR ROLLING DOWN MY CHEEK NOW! :-) WHY WON"T ANYONE HELP
SARA?
"On February 28, Salzman filed an incident report with the Arapahoe County
Sheriff's Office, but she says the deputy who assisted her said that the
Internet hijinks probably aren't in violation of any laws -- and that if
they are, they're probably just a misdemeanor, and Arapahoe County doesn't
extradite people for misdemeanors."
TOUGH LUCK SQUEALING SOW
"... posted to two neo-Nazi news groups -- alt.politics.nationalism.white
and alt.politics.white-power."
Hmmmh LOOKS LIKE DEMONIZING AND PAINTING A WHOLE GROUP WITH THE SAME
BRUSH!
"Patrick Blakely, the man behind the RevWhite moniker.. ..continued on
with a crusade to rid the Web of child porn and gay chat rooms. According
to a January 15, 1997, Wired News article, he vowed to "lead an '[Internet
Relay Chat] Watch' campaign, using the nickname 'RevWhite,' until the
network is purged of chat channels like '#gayboysex.'" The article goes on
to say that "RevWhite has been joined in his crusade by at least one vocal
supporter, Don Ellis, whose Web site, The American Guardian, promotes many
of the same values as RevWhite's own Maryland Christian Politics site."
I GUESS SARA IS DEFENSIVE OF CHILD PORN ETC. WHY WOULD THE ARTICLE SPEAK
NEGATIVELY OF TWO PEOPLE TRYING TO RID THE NET OF ITS INFLUENCES! LEAVE IT
TO JEWS TO DEFEND THE PERVERSE!
"In March, Salzman contacted the Eleventh Judicial District in Star City,
Arkansas, the town where Ellis lives, and spoke to Deputy Prosecuting
Attorney Phillip Green. "It was like talking to someone in Mayberry,"
Salzman says. Green told her that if she wanted to press charges against
Ellis, she would have to fly to Arkansas. Instead of doing that, Salzman
convinced Green to send Ellis a cease-and-desist letter. On April 11,
Green wrote back, saying, "After a thorough review of various e-mails
provided to me by you and by Mr. Ellis, I have determined that there is no
basis for involvement by my office."
POOR SQUEALING SOW! THE FEDS WON'T PAY ATTENTION TO HER, THE SHERIFF WON'T
DO A THING, AND NOW THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY GIVES HER THE BRUSH OFF!
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Phillip Green continued:
"Green told Westword that Ellis, an auto mechanic whom everyone in town
knows, gave him copies of his Internet correspondence with Salzman. Green
said that because Ellis and Salzman had argued back and forth, it would be
hard to prove that the communication was unsolicited. "If she's posting
things, she's sort of inviting some kind of response," he says. "I didn't
think it rose to the level of a criminal matter. I don't want to prosecute
people just for saying stuff that other people don't like, and I would
have had a hard time making a harassment case out of it."
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY MORE OR LESS SAID SARA BROUGHT IT UPON HERSELF!
"(Someone) posted a message threatening to skin Salzman alive and use her
skin to make a new holster for his gun."
WE HAVE YET TO SEE THE SQUEALING SOW POST THE DEJACOM URL WHICH SHOWS A
POST MADE IN HER NAME HAD SUCH A REPLY COMPLETE WITH ALL MESSAGE IDs AND
REFERENCES! IT LOOKS LIKE SHE SUFFERS FROM A MENTAL CONDITION CALLED
"HOLOCAUSTRIA" WHICH IS A HYSTERIA WHICH DRIVES JEWS TO MAKE THEMSELVES
VICTIMS SO THEY MAY WALLOW IN THEIR SELF-INDUCED VICTIMHOOD.
"FBI Special Agent Jane Quimby says that her agency is reviewing Salzman's
case and that it may investigate and eventually hand it over to the U.S.
Attorney's Office. According to the federal statute on interstate
communication, there must be a specific threat in order for federal
prosecutors to get involved, Quimby says. "It's not enough to say, 'I hope
[Bob] dies' or 'I hope someone kills [Bob].' It has to be 'I will kill
you.'"
<END>
Remember this FORGERY Sara?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=digsig=&rnum=2&seld=916059497&ic=1
(This deals more with fabricating evidence!)
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,soc.culture.jewish,alt.conspiracy
Subject: "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 05:00:19 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <96fnp3$2bar$1...@news.tht.net>
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1
Last-Modified: 2001/02/14
<start>
39 That on November 11, 1999, Defendant sent Plaintiff an
electronic communication stating in pertinent part:
"You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt
buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!"
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRt ptdrtqb
qfQbXQtisWlB/E1+yWkYkw1Wr7mGiAFcJ w6Wl/aU
4GEbQtlQOHN/G3asOLBC9JmQXWuqXwj BnPCuOV9cd
Said telephonic communication is attached hereto and made part
hereof as Exhibit "A-16."
<stop>
The above is an exact quote from the post Ken McVay posted and here is the
GOOGLE archive link for verification:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=McVay=&rnum=1&seld=925573239&ic=1
"ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
alt.revisionism - 14/Feb/2001 by Kenneth McVay, OBC
Crypto Kong does not insert blank lines in between "Authentic Doc Tavish"
and the crypto-text as confirmed by the software's author to both myself
and my attorney!
Here is the official reply to my inquiry:
X-Sender: jam...@shell11.ba.best.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:51:20 -0800
To: Scott Bradbury <xx...@flash.net>
From: "James A. Donald"
Subject: Re: Inquiry on Crypto-Kong Signatures
Cc: "Daylin B. Leach - Attorney at Law" <xxx...@aol.com>
--
At 0412 AM 2/23/2001 -0600, Scott Bradbury wrote
> The above forged digital signataure is verbatim and is exactly which was
> presented to the court.
To be presented to the court, it must be alleged to have signed
something. A digital signature without the text that it signed is of no
significance.
(Note: I did not include Yale's fabricated e-mail- I just sent Mr. Donald
the forged digital signature.)
> The digsig also has a blank line in between "Authentic Doc
> Tavish" and the bogus crypto-text. Your software does not do this in
> ANY example I've ever seen.
That is perfectly true. My program does not emit such blank lines, which
suggest fabrication, but not strong evidence of anything much, since the
blank line could have arisen from various accidents in transferring text
from one program to another.
> I do this for the benefit of my attorney. -)
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
GnwV4rmsIA8faEZwt0YOXUiSSJflZjiLd/kTrWIn
4F1jg73LTqhfLPw9BVz2uDGwa7v2WYBG0wNGHSkoM
<END>
--
As for Mr. Donald's statement: "the blank line could have arisen from
various accidents in transferring text from one program to another"-
the above fabricated signature from Edeiken's complaint is verbatim in the
group of false accusations known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT ... ARE
DEEMED ADMITTED." Notice Mr. Donald's digsig? No spaces and blank lines!
Notice my digsig made on this paragraph alone?
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ejnWmIh1JCyv0DNQedTMFE/cAfXBLuqdxSAkk9w/
4O0CysIswhm2G04W2mJFeW7C7K5RHQkNr3oFBzH6X
NO BLANK LINES AND SPACES!
What are the penalties for submitting manufactured evidence?
[...]
Here is more about the criminal e-mail I allegedly sent and notice Edeiken
blows his charge!
(Notice that Edeiken didn't include the forged signature in any of his
USENET posts. It does make one wonder why! I would tend to think Edeiken
added the forged digsig just before he made his presentation to court BUT
this doesn't make sense seeing how always said: "I think you need a good
psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people
who write anonumus notes to others like.." It would only make sense that
if the note was "anonumus" it could not be such if I signed it with my
name and digsig would it!? See how Edeiken goofs up? What a stooge and
lying bastard!)
Subject: Edeiken's "Butt Buddy" Trend -- Have You All Noticed? aka Re:
Blakley Tells truth again, edeiken squirms with legalistic answer
Date: 08/31/2000
Author: Doktor Tavische <doc_t...@NOSPAMscottsmail.com>
On Thu, 31 Aug 2000 02:02:26 -0400, "P.W. Blakely" <pwbla...@gmx.net>
wrote:
>Again, evasion noted. Good night.
>
>P.S. - a real lawyer would be going after someone they can actually get
>money from.
Tubby's not a real lawyer!
>--Pat W Blakely--
>http://www.christianbiblestudy.org
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Blakley Tells truth again, edeiken squirms with legalistic
Message-ID: <1vmr5.2064$dD4.1...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 05:59:25 GMT
>Criminal Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net> wrote in message
>news:1vmr5.2064$dD4.1...@monger.newsread.com...
>>
>> P.W. Blakely <pwbla...@gmx.net> wrote in message
>> news:39ad...@post.usenet.com...
>> > **** Post for FREE via your newsreader at post.usenet.com ****
>> >
>> > Your refusal to prove the entire verdict was thrown out in appeals court
>> > is noted.
>> >
>> > The fact you can not document Bradbury forgering your identity is noted.
>> What makes you think I cannot?
>>
>> Unlike you and your butt-buddy Bradeshit I will present my case in the
>> court-room.
That's the second time in a week that Edeiken has used the term "butt
buddy". He is on record using the term "butt buddy" as shown in this
recent post:
http://x56.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=663340383
Subject: Re: A MESSAGE FOR YALE EDEIKEN
Date: 08/28/2000
Author: Yale F. Edeiken <ya...@enter.net>
".. Ask you butt0buddy. He has been served with a copy
of it. --YFE"
I looked at the above for a bit and I thought there was something familiar
about it! I realized that Yale had used a term that I have never used BUT
he has!
Guess what? Tubby accused me of sending him threatening e-mail as detailed
below and guess what term was used. Can anyone show a post where I called
another person a "butt buddy"? What are the penalties for presenting
false, perjured, or manufactured evidence?
Here is Tubby making his false accusation and notice "butt buddy" is used:
http://x59.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=623923668
On Tue, 16 May 2000 04:12:22 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
<GU3U4.3347$v%5.24...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>news:3920c22c....@news.flash.net...
[...]
>> > Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who write anonumus
>> >notes to others like:
>> >
>> > " You are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your
>> >butt buddy Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and
>> >character assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly
>> >work you over with an ice pick Yale!"
>> The above is just exactly what you said it is Yale, "anonumus" your word!
>> Just because you are a paranoid and have a psychotic dislike of me does
>> not mean every thing you imagine comes from me.
> It came from you
Then why didn't you show the headers which would show so Yale?
>and was signed by you.
Then why didn't you show my signature? If I signed it and it was from me
as you claim why do you call it "anonumus"? It would not be so if were
truly from me as headers would show and it actually had my signature!
What did you say in just another post about the "e-mail" above Yale? Your
own words again: "Perhaps you should ask your shrink about people who
write anonumus notes to others like:" It's ANONYMOUS Yale! You've said so!
Subject: Re: Nradbury Goes Off the Deep End
Message-ID: <Ms1U4.3324$v%5.23...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 01:26:04 GMT
(Exact quote for the record)
" I think you need a good psychiatirc examination. Perhaps you should ask
your shrink about people who write anonumus notes to others like: " You
are just as much of a filthy little cock sucker vermin as your butt buddy
Jeff Brown. You have to rely on out of context quotes and character
assassination. It would be a pleasure to see someone slowly work you over
with an ice pick Yale!""
No headers and no signature. Yale's evidence fails just like he does as a
lawyer!
Need I say more about this mentally unbalanced jerk? How many more times
will psychotic Edeiken attempt to perpetrate the same lie?
I guess the above is fair proof that Yale likes to forge e-mail even if it
is in his word "anonumus."
>> Your failure to do the same is noted. And will be by the judge.
Shut up lard ass! Who else are you going to file a lawsuit against?
>> --YFE
Doc Tavish
~~End of Archive~~
>Sara
--
NOW PAY ATTENTION TO MY DIGSIG- NO BLANK LINES OR SPACES AS YALE'S FORGED
VERSION SHOWED!
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
RM0I/hHfXkOGaQdf3ppqSUGOtWo9g9VVb/P2L/y1
46yzyL6Dxk/LuLV0F03EmKOj2InhLM57zOWIrJRGY
Sara
DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
> On 20 Mar 2001 03:15:31 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <2rfdbt86beprn56lo...@4ax.com>,
> >DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >Mr Bradbury:
> >
> >Please ask your attorney to explain the following terms to you:
> >
> >"Predicate act"
> >
> >"criminal enterprise"
> >
> >"RICO"
>
> Those terms could apply to you, Yale, Joel Rosenberg, and Yale's Canadian
> pal because you all have engaged in criminal acts in unison to harass me.
Really? Then file a RICO action and shut the hell up.
>
> >And then you might ask him why he compared you to Adolf Eichmann in
> >open court.
>
> So you say perjurer!
Not me! I never said it. DAYLIN LEACH said it in reference to YOU, Mr.
Bradbury. He described your philosophy as "the politics of Adolf
Eichmann." I'm surprised your buddy Pat Blakely didn't mention that to
you.
> So you say! I thought he accused Yale F. Edeiken of
> being Joseph Stalin! :-)
Smile all you want, but he didn't compare Mr. Edeiken to Stalin. He
compared _YOU_ to Adolf Eichmann.
Sounds like your attorney has a great deal of respect for you, doesn't
it?
Paul Kneisel
third party articles dealing with the issue are "leftist innuendo," and the
issue of abortion rights and homosexuality are intimately involved in the
ostensible "perjury" against him.
Bradbury increasingly marks himself as a nutter in his own writings,
something that would be otherwise amusing were it not for his fascist
proclivities.
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:07:41 -0600, "McTavish Informational Services
(Non-Profit) " <DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com>
<osjdbt41kq8ov7moq...@4ax.com> wrote: ...
McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
On 20 Mar 2001 00:30:56 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <8tqcbt4p9ngm08ivd...@4ax.com>,
>DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com wrote:
>
>> --
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:23:35 -0600, "Public <Anonymous_Account>"
>> <rema...@anon.xg.nu> wrote:
>>
>> >At the Bradbury School of Fine Posting, we specialize in teaching you
>> >the finer points of the Robert Scott Bradbury Technique (TM) of posting
>> >to Usenet.
>> >
>> >This includes:
>> >- saying in 15,000 lines what c be said in 2
>> >- spamming multiple newsgroups with nonsensical drivel
>> >- practicing law on usenet without a license
>> >-practicing law on usenet without a brain
>> >-wRiTiNg in cAps ThAt mAKe No sEnSe.
>> Tears you up doesn't it that I now have Yale being investigated for his
>> incitements to murder doesn't it?
>Investigated by whom? There's no investigation and you know it.
You are in for a very rude awakening. The case has already been added to
the task load for the detectives working through the DA's office. I filed
last week and the detective said due to the work load it would take about
10 to 14 days for them to get to it. There are only three detectives! It
is in the "cache" so to speak!
>> Doesn't take a law degree to discern that Yale identified himself as
>> "nazihunter" in his submission to court.
>You're still lying, Mr. Bradbury.
How is that Sara? Yale plainly identified himself as the plaintiff and
that I had threatened him when I had replied to "nazihunter." I read
Detective Hilbert what Edeiken "said" and he says if the text read by me
over thee telephone is verified then Edeiken is in trouble and what he did
was a criminal offense. The detective took it that Edeiken also implicated
himself as "nazihunter." My attorney was sent a copy of my proofs and it
was he who gave me names and telephone numbers and told me to officially
file criminal charges against Edeiken with both the District Attorney and
District Justice (evidently he also took it Edeiken implicated himself as
being nazihunter and as I have said- everyone who has seen my proofs sees
that Yale implicated himself!).
Once again what I have posted and this is the short version:
From the document being circulated known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
COMPLAINT
1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
[...]
51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
threat to Plaintiff:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<end>
Now for a reading comprehension test because we all know you are stupid
and these questions should be simple enough for you!
1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
"nazihunter." :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing
Time is on His Side">
Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you know the answers
to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
Yale F. Edeiken
3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
that I threatened him! Now I ask:
a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
b" Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
so!
Only the staunch Edeikenites are in denial.
Here is the post and how I replied in actual context:
Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded..
Date: 12/18/1999
Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
On 15-Dec-1999, "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
> It seems that ever since Tavish's address was published, he
> seems to have disappeared.
> Has he fled?
> Or, better yet, has someone paid him a visit?
I'm standing behind you with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded
slowly squeezing the trigger for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-)
Sleep on that a while "nazihunter."
Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
<END>
Did Yale F. Edeiken or did he not implicate himself as being:
"nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>?
Did "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com> post this just the night before?
From: "nazihunter"
Subject: WHY NOT GIVE THE NAZI SHITHEAD TAVISH A CALL
Date: 14 Dec 1999 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <1999121500...@cotse.com
X-Abuse-to: ab...@cotse.com
Organization: cotse
X-Abuse-goto: http://packetderm.cotse.com/cgi-bin/blockit.cgi
X-Comments: Anonymous mail2news gate web interface -
www.cotse.com/anonnews.htm.
X-Mail-To-News-Contact: ab...@zedz.net
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Anonymously posted.
The following is the address for Doc Tavish
Scott Bradbury
<address and telephone number deleted>
Why not call him and tell him what a nazi prick he is.
Better yet, why not visit him.......with a baseball bat.
<END>
Did another attorney named Paul Tauger post this concerning posts such as
the above:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Tauger=&rnum=1&seld=935748656&ic=1
"Posting someone's name, address and telephone number, along with an
invitation to visit them with baseball bats sounds fairly close to recent
case in which an a prolife group posted the names of doctors who performed
abortions along with what the court found was tantamount to an invitation
to murder them." Paul Tauger - Attorney January 23, 2001
I think Yale would probably look quite dapper in an orange jump suit and
for that matter you just may be fitted with one yourself perjurer!
Believe me I am putting forth my best efforts! :->
>> Look! In his own words and with a few comments by me to highlight the
>> obvious!
>>
>> Previously addressed to Sara Salzman which is most likely you anyway!
>Are you accusing me? If so, file charges NOW and prove it.
I am accusing you of perjury and accusing Edeiken of incitement to murder
among other things.
>I have never posted anonymously and you know it, Liar.
Yes you have and YOU know it. I will prove so in all due time!
Doc Tavish
>Sara
---
"If you stop fabricating lies about me, I will stop disclosing the
truth about you." Adapted from UKRAINE ORGANIZATION'S Terms of Truce
--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
ck6sBn9PjZ5TPOlpGYXaEK1KBnq3J9+Gdpc20yPy
4DQNFcgIg+k/GGSrT8GFF94iA81sGUWmqjgy/nUcw
Gord McFee
12:37:38 GMT, "McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit) "
<DELETE2MAI...@my-deja.com> wrote:
[...]
> How is that Sara? Yale plainly identified himself as the plaintiff and
> that I had threatened him when I had replied to "nazihunter." I read
> Detective Hilbert what Edeiken "said" and he says if the text read by me
> over thee telephone is verified then Edeiken is in trouble and what he did
> was a criminal offense. The detective took it that Edeiken also implicated
> himself as "nazihunter." My attorney was sent a copy of my proofs and it
> was he who gave me names and telephone numbers and told me to officially
> file criminal charges against Edeiken with both the District Attorney and
> District Justice (evidently he also took it Edeiken implicated himself as
> being nazihunter and as I have said- everyone who has seen my proofs sees
> that Yale implicated himself!).
Suuuuuuure.
> Once again what I have posted and this is the short version:
>
> From the document being circulated known as "ALL FACTS IN THE COMPLAINT
> AND ADMISSIONS ARE DEEMED ADMITTED."
>
> COMPLAINT
> 1 Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken (hereinafter "Plaintiff") is a an
> adult citizen and resident of Lehigh County, Pennsylvania.
>
> [...]
>
> 51. On December 18, 1999, Defendant published the following
> threat to Plaintiff:
>
> Subject: Re: WHERE OR WHERE IS TAVISH - I'm standing behind you with my
> Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
> with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
> for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil nazihunter."
> Doc Tavish Knowing Time is on His Side
>
> <end>
>
> Now for a reading comprehension test because we all know you are stupid
> and these questions should be simple enough for you!
> 1) Who identified himself as the Plaintiff?
Yale Edeiken.
> 2) Who claimed that he was threatened when I posted these words as he
> stated them in his "complaint": <I'm standing behind you with my
> Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded.. . . . . . . I'm standing behind you
> with my Desert Eagle .50AE locked and loaded slowly squeezing the trigger
> for an excellent one shot- one kill! :-) Sleep on that a whil
> "nazihunter." :-) Sleep on that a whil "nazihunter." Doc Tavish Knowing
> Time is on His Side">
Can you not even quote yourself correctly?
> Before I ask the third question I want to make sure you know the answers
> to 1 & 2. Do you? Everyone I've showed this to has answered:
> Yale F. Edeiken
Obviously your circle of friends is on the dense side.
> 3) Who did I address my remark to as a matter of legal fact? I state such
> in my reply to which Yale F. Edeiken charged: "On December 18, 1999,
> Defendant published the following threat to Plaintiff:"?
>
> I addressed as shown in my reply- "nazihunter" YET Yale F. Edeiken charges
> that I threatened him! Now I ask:
> a) Who claimed to be threatened by me? <Yale F. Edeiken>
> b" Who was I, in fact, replying to? <nazihunter>
Why don't you post the entire post, Scott?
> 4) Is it not logical to conclude that Yale F. Edeiken was nazihunter on
> the night of December 14th? Everyone of sound mind and reasoning thinks
> so!
Just once and only for the hell of it. The alternative, and correct
interpretation, is that you were accusing Edeiken of being Nazihunter.
Think about it.
[...]
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org