Marble Bag Advice for My Aryan Brothers
Dr. Gassen Burnham
the best way to accomplish this. So, but being it as it may, the
scrotum hair has to go too. It's not that hard. So I share the
following tips with you....
1) A shaved scrotum should not even be attempted unless you're totally
awake, alert and straight. The skin of the scrotum is extremely thin
and soft, which means it will be much easier to hurt yourself while
shaving.
2) Trim any long pubic hairs down to a stubble before you shave your
scrotum. And don't dull your razor's blade, use a pair of sharp
scissors or a hair trimmer instead.
3) Wet, soft hairs will pull less and be much easier to cut cleanly
with your razor's blade, so soak in a hot tub for a while before you
begin shaving. You'll see - Your shaved scrotum will thank you by not
becoming irritated.
4) Some males prefer to shave their scrotum outside of the tub:
For a well shaved scrotum, you'll need an easy and clear view. Set up
some comfortable seating, with a clean towel, in front of a mirror.
Make sure there's plenty of light. You need to be able to see the
individual hairs.
Have a table or something on the side where you can place another
clean, dry towel and a container of warm water to rinse your razor. And
allow your razor to soak in the warm water for a few minutes before you
start shaving.
A shaving cream or gel will initially feel cold and this will cause
your scrotum to become tense, shrink to a much smaller size and create
a harder skin surface. These males say it makes it much easier to get a
smoothly shaved scrotum.
But - If you've had ANY kind of a reaction to shaving creams or gels
when shaving other parts of your body, you definitely don't want to use
them for scrotum shaving. Remember, this skin is unlike any other part
of your body and very sensitive.
5) Some males prefer to shave their scrotum while they're in the tub:
Use an oil such as Tea Tree, Mink or plain mineral oil for the
smoothest shaved scrotum possible. These oils will create a super slick
surface for your razor's blade to glide across. Just be sure not to
allow your blade to slip ... Even just a small nick to the scrotal skin
will bleed profusely.
6) Regardless whether you choose to obtain a shaved scrotum in or out
of the tub, ALWAYS use a new blade in your razor EVERY TIME you shave
your scrotum. A dull blade will pull on the hairs and agitate the hair
follicles so that your scrotum will end up looking more like a pin
cushion. No one wants to feel or see that.
7) Gently stretch and flatten the skin of the scrotum with your free
hand and start slowly shaving towards the inner thigh with the other.
8) Don't press down on your razor or repeat strokes in any one area or
your shaved scrotum will get that pin cushion effect.
9) Once you're sure your shaved scrotum is completely smooth, rinse
well with warm water to remove any lingering lubricant.
10) Now - it may not sound at all appealing, but the after effects will
be well worth it - Rinse your shaved scrotum with cold water. Doing so
will close and calm the jangled hair follicles, which will limit any
bacteria from entering them, thus preventing irritations.
11) Don't rub your shaved scrotum dry, pat it gently with a clean, soft
towel.
12) Lightly dust your shaved scrotum with a talc free powder or just
regular cornstarch to absorb moisture and oils. In fact, it's a good
idea to do this after you wash your shaved scrotum on a daily basis. It
will go a long way towards limiting itching.
13) If at all possible, shave last thing at night so you can just climb
into bed without anything on. If not, at least wear some loose fitting
boxer shorts to limit friction against your newly shaved scrotum.
If you follow these steps, you'll find that you'll have that shaved
scrotum that is simply scrumptious! And it will be more pleasant when
you rub baby oil onto your mate's marble bag as well.
Enjoy!
Questions?
Joe Bruno
Dr. Gassen Burnham wrote:
Many of your marbles are missing.
Topaz
http://www.natvan.com
"The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe
that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were
promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.
That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
World War some important government business, including the
ratification of a new German constitution, took place in the city of
Weimar. The Jews loved the Weimar period, but it was, in fact, the
most degenerate period in Germany's history. The Jews, of course,
didn't think of it as
degenerate. They thought of it as "modern" and "progressive" and
"cool." Really, it was a very Jewish period, where lying was
considered a virtue. The Jews were riding high. Many books have been
written by Jews in America about Weimar Germany, all praising it to
the skies and looking back on it with nostalgia. Even without the
so-called
"Holocaust," they never have forgiven the Nazis for bringing an end to
the Weimar period.
There was a Hollywood film made 30 years ago, in 1972, about Weimar
Germany. The film was called Cabaret, and it starred Liza Minelli. It
depicted Berlin night life, with all its degeneracy, including the
flourishing of homosexuality, and also depicted the fight between the
communists and the Jews and the other proponents of modernism on the
one
hand and the Nazis on the other hand. The Hollywood filmmakers, of
course, were solidly on the side of the degenerates and portrayed the
Nazis as the bad guys, but this film is another example of the Jews
outsmarting themselves. The Jews who made the film saw everything from
their viewpoint, through their own eyes, and the degenerate Gentiles
under their spell also saw things from the Jewish viewpoint, but the
Jews apparently didn't stop to think -- or didn't care -- that a
normal, healthy White person would view things differently. Check it
out for yourself. Cabaret is still available in video stores.
The point I am making is this: In the 1920s, after the First World
War, the Jews were trying to do to Germany what they began doing to
America after the Second World War, in the 1960s. Many Germans, the
healthiest elements in Germany, resisted the Jews' efforts, just as
many Americans have resisted the Jews' efforts in America. In Germany
the Jews were a bit premature. Although they had much of the media
under their control,
they didn't control all of the media. They tried to move too fast. The
healthiest Germans resisted and beat them.
In America, in the 1960s, the Jews had almost total media control
before they began their big push, and they proceeded more carefully.
In America they are winning. The culture of lies has prevailed in
America. It's still possible for Americans to win, but it's going to
be a lot tougher this time. We'd better get started. The first step is
to regain at least partial control of our media, so that we can begin
contradicting the lies. This American Dissident Voices broadcast is a
part of that first step."
http://www.nationalvanguard.org http://www.natvan.com
http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.ihr.org/
Joe Bruno
Topaz wrote:
> By Dr. William Pierce
> http://www.natvan.com
>
> "The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
> They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
> advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
> publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
> of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
> They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance." They were
> ridiculing German tradition and culture and morality and the German
> sense of personal honor, trying hard to make young Germans believe
> that it was "cool" to be rootless and cosmopolitan. They were
> promoting the same culture of lies that they have been promoting here.
Proof????????????????????????????????????????????????????
>
Kurt Knoll
That was the so-called "Weimar" period, because right after the First
"Joe Bruno" <br...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:1163553858....@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Chris C. Larson
Kurt Knoll wrote:
> Here it is Joe
Kurt:
You and Alex are off topic again. For you, I'd skip trying to follow
Gassen's advice about doing what your Aryan Warrior friends appraently
do for fun.
Don't bother with the step by step guide Kurt. Instead, grab the
stickiest duct tape that you can find and go to work with that.
Strategically place the duct tape and make sure that it is secure.
Then yell Heil Hitler! and yank the tape off.
Kurt Knoll
"Chris C. Larson" <larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163606787.8...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
Chris C. Larson
Kurt Knoll wrote:
> Here it is Joe
>
> > Kurt:
> > You and Alex are off topic again. For you, I'd skip trying to follow
> > Gassen's advice about doing what your Aryan Warrior friends appraently
> > do for fun.
> >
> > Don't bother with the step by step guide Kurt. Instead, grab the
> > stickiest duct tape that you can find and go to work with that.
> > Strategically place the duct tape and make sure that it is secure.
> > Then yell Heil Hitler! and yank the tape off.
> >
Kurt- so how did this go???
Kurt Knoll
"Chris C. Larson" <larsonc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1163612713.0...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
reap_...@yahoo.co.uk
Kurt Knoll wrote:
> Here it is Joe
>
> By Dr. William Pierce
> http://www.natvan.com
>
> "The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
> They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
> advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
> publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
> of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
> They were pushing for "diversity" and "tolerance."
Oh, wow!
Could this be the same Dr Price accused of fleecing the disgruntled (in
the white power movement) of a few dollars and building an empire
dedicated to feeding, clothing, and erecting a temple to himself?
He's just a good ol' boy that was affiliated to the National
Alliance and the American Nazi Party - or so it's suggested.
http://www.diacritica.com/sobaka/dossier/pierce.html
http://www.adl.org/learn/ext_us/Pierce.asp
No axe to grind there, eh? A truly unbiased soul, although not exactly
a great thinker! And certainly not a trustworthy "source" for
events historical!
By the way, I'm not too sure there's anything wrong with either
diversity or tolerance?
Topaz
We've talked about many subjects on these American Dissident Voices
programs, but one theme which has appeared in nearly every program has
been the role of the Jews, either in our history or in our lives
today. To a certain extent that's been unavoidable, because of the
influence they have over current events through their control of the
mass media and because of their historical role in communism. But it's
more than that.
What I've said, in one way or another on several programs, is that the
Jewish role in our lives goes far beyond the fact that their control
of the news and entertainment media gives them a big influence on
popular culture and on the political process. Today I want to talk
again about this Jewish role. I want to try to give you an overview of
it first. There are about 14 million Jews in the world today,
according to the Encyclopaedia Britannica Yearbook for 1997. Nearly
half of those -- about six million -- are now in North America, where
they make up just over two per cent of the population but wield far
more influence than any other group.
The world's 14 million Jews think and act like one big family -- even
though, like most families, they do a lot of arguing and squabbling
among themselves. They go to different synagogues -- Orthodox and
Conservative and Reform -- or to no synagogue at all. There are
atheist Jews, and there are Jews who have converted to Christianity.
There are capitalist Jews and communist Jews, homosexual Jews and
heterosexual Jews. There are rich Jews and middle-class Jews and even
a few poor Jews, but despite this apparent diversity they do a better
job of cooperating with each other and looking out for their common
interests than any other ethnic group in the world.
Why is this? Why are Jews more racially conscious than anyone else?
Why are they so much more ready to collaborate with each other than
members of other groups? Part of the reason is in their religion. It
is an ethnocentric religion, a racist religion. Whereas Christianity
and Islam, for example, are universalist religions, religions for
anyone who chooses to believe in them, Judaism is not. Judaism is a
religion only for the Chosen People, only for the circumcised sons of
Abraham. Jews are defined in terms of their bloodline, not in terms of
their faith, which is why non-religious Jews like Freud or Trotsky or
even Marx, the father of atheistic communism, are considered just as
much Jews as the most pious synagogue-goer, with sidelocks and
yarmulke. The non-religious Jews don't believe the hocus-pocus in
their Torah, or Old Testament, but they nevertheless are steeped in
the folklore and traditions of Judaism. They are as familiar as their
religious cousins are with the claims that Jews are a Chosen People,
destined to own all of the world's wealth and be waited on hand and
foot by non-Jews. And they are familiar with the tales of persecution,
from the time of the pharaohs until the time of Hitler: with the
tradition of being universally hated by all the other peoples of the
world -- which is why they believe they are justified in avenging
themselves on non-Jews whenever they have the opportunity.
I'll not spend any time quoting Bible verses to you today, but if you
doubt what I've just told you about the religious basis for Jewish
ethnocentrism, just read the Old Testament: especially the five books
of Moses and the book of Isaiah. Study them carefully. Even the
bowdlerized King James translation is pretty clear. If you really want
to rub your nose in this subject, do some browsing in the Talmud -- or
for a solid scientific treatment, read the books recently written by a
real expert on the subject, California State University psychology
professor Dr. Kevin MacDonald. All three of his books are available
from National Vanguard Books, the sponsor of this program. Those books
are subtitled "Judaism as a Group Evolutionary Strategy, Toward an
Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism," and "An Evolutionary Analysis
of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political
Movements." Pretty heavy reading, but very convincing, very thorough.
This tendency of the Jews to stick together, always to favor their
fellow Jews over non-Jews, and to work for the interests of their
tribe instead of just for their individual interests is a fact: a very
enviable fact. It is the primary reason for their extraordinary level
of wealth and power through the ages.
You know, there are clubby little groups of White men who cooperate
with each other to advance their interests. But those interests are
personal and individual, not racial or even tribal. And virtually all
of the really influential groups of this sort -- the Council on
Foreign Relations, for example, or groups of very rich and powerful
men, corporate bosses or bankers, are in fact heavily larded with
Jews. They're not racial groups at all, even if they don't have any
Blacks or Chinamen in them. They're simply special-interest groups,
whereas the 14 million Jews of the world form a huge, self-conscious
racial-interest group. They really are unique in this regard.
I wish that our people had the same degree of racial consciousness the
Jews do. The Jews understand the power of togetherness. Most of our
people don't. And this is largely the reason why we're in the mess
we're in today. I'll come back to this point in a few minutes…
In the first century BC, the Greek writer Strabo commented: "The Jews
have penetrated every country, so that it is difficult to find any
place in the world where their tribe has not entered and become
dominant." Note those words: "There is no place where they have not
become dominant." The great geographer and historian Strabo was not
the only scholar of the ancient world to make that observation about
the Jews. The Jews became dominant by accumulating a substantial
portion of the wealth of every country that they infiltrated. And they
accumulated their wealth by collaborating with each other and preying
on the host population. Their collaboration was based on their racial
consciousness, on their conviction that they were a distinct and
unique people, superior to the people among whom they lived and
deserving of whatever they could take away from their hosts. The Jews
in Rome did not think of themselves as Romans who happened to believe
in Judaism, but as Jews who happened to live in Rome. And the same for
every other country where they lived.
With the sort of attitude and behavior the Jews had they were bound to
be hated by everyone -- and they reciprocated. The Jews regarded the
hatred they had for their hosts as justified, just as they considered
deceiving and exploiting their hosts to be justified; but their hosts'
hatred of the Jews they regarded as "bigotry" and "persecution." Their
history is a chronicle of one "persecution" after another, right down
to modern times. During the Middle Ages they were kicked en masse out
of every country in Europe, repeatedly. They pretend today that this
supposed "persecution" was the result of religious bigotry on the part
of their hosts, but in fact it was simply self-defense on the part of
their hosts, the same sort of reaction to their presence that the
Egyptians and the Greeks and the Romans and everyone else in
pre-Christian times had had. And it was this barrier of hatred between
the Jews and the rest of the world which made it possible for them to
maintain their identity and their sense of racial self-consciousness.
If you want to study some of these details of Jewish history for
yourself, there are many good books available. One I have read and
found valuable is A History of the Jews by Abram Sachar. Sachar was
the president of Brandeis University, and of course, he looks at
history very subjectively and from a very Jewish point of view. But
his history is revealing, and you can find it in most large libraries.
Now, this peculiar mode of existence of the Jews I have described
changed to a certain extent shortly after the Second World War, with
the theft of Palestine and the establishment of the new state of
Israel on Palestinian territory. Today one-third of the world's Jews
live in Israel, but this is only made possible because the other
two-thirds are continuing their existence as parasitic minorities
among Gentile hosts. Without a constant supply of money extorted from
Germany, the United States, and other countries, Israel could not
continue to exist. Israel would have gone under half-a-dozen times in
its warfare with its neighbors during the past 50 years if the United
States had not provided massive military and diplomatic support. If
all of the Jews in America and Europe sold their television networks
and newspapers and film studios and moved to Israel, that flow of
blood from their hosts would be cut off, and Israel soon would cease
to exist.
The third thing we must understand about the Jews is the way in which
they maintain their status as the dominant minority among us today. In
Strabo's day it was through their accumulated wealth. They were able
to buy influence and special privileges for themselves. It remained
that way pretty much for the next 1900 years. Throughout the Middle
Ages they made themselves useful as sources of money to kings and
popes and emperors. They would suck the wealth from the host
population, and then give or lend some of it to the rulers in return
for being allowed to keep their privileges. Although they usually were
tolerated for their usefulness by the rulers, they were hated
intensely by the general population. The Jews bought the tolerance of
the rulers, but of course, they couldn't afford to buy the tolerance
of the people.
And so until quite recently the Jews maintained a separate existence
among the host population, often living in ghettos, not mixing
socially with their hosts, generally not engaging in the same
occupations, and regarded with disdain if not revulsion by everyone.
The great advantage for our people of this mode of existence was that
the damage done by the Jews was mostly economic, although they also
caused political mischief when it suited their needs. But they had
almost no cultural influence on our people. They didn't write books or
plays, they didn't paint or compose music, they didn't clog up our
universities, they didn't run for public office, and of course, they
didn't have television studios or newspapers or advertising agencies.
And so to a large extent they lived their lives, and we lived ours.
That began changing drastically approximately 200 years ago, with the
advent of the mass media and mass democracy, and the change
accelerated greatly during this century. Jews understood immediately
the potential that newspapers and other media gave them for extending
their influence from the rulers to the whole population, and democracy
made this extension of their influence relevant; democracy provided
the tool for transforming influence into power. I've described on
other programs the way in which the Jews acquired control of our mass
media and, through the media, control of the political process, and I
won't repeat that story today. There's an up-to-date summary of Jewish
media control in the National Vanguard Books catalog, which is
available from the sponsor of this program…
So now let's look at the details of the Jewish application of
influence through media control. Most people have a very limited range
of real life experiences. Television and films and glossy magazine
advertisements provide an enormous expansion of experience for the
average person, by substituting artificial experiences for real
experiences. On the television screen viewers experience artificial
social relationships, artificial romances, artificial conflicts,
artificial life. In advertisements they are given artificial ideals of
beauty and fashion, artificial life-styles to which they can aspire.
And in their newspapers and newsmagazines they are given a carefully
filtered, a carefully slanted, view of what is happening in the world.
And unfortunately most people do not have sufficient powers of
discrimination to distinguish the artificial world of the media from
the real world of everyday experience. The two worlds merge in their
minds, and they can't tell them apart. What people see on the
television screen is not just entertainment; it is a collection of
artificial experiences which merges with their collection of real
experiences and gives them a new and largely artificial basis for
evaluating things and making decisions. Cleverly designed
advertisements don't just show potential customers what is available
and give them the information they need to choose what they want;
clever advertising actually creates new wants, new desires, that
didn't exist before. The advertisements manipulate people's desires
and motivations. In a similar way television entertainment manipulates
viewers psychologically. It changes their values and attitudes. It
strongly affects the way they see things -- including political issues
and political candidates.
Well, I hardly have to tell you that the modern mass media give
enormous power, unprecedented power, to whoever controls them --
especially in a democracy. And really, no knowledgeable person who is
honest will dispute my conclusion here. There are many people, who are
not knowledgeable, who believe that they can watch television without
being affected by it, who believe that they make up their minds
independently without relying on the artificial reality supplied by
television, but most of these people are mistaken, and the experts
will agree with me on this. The mass media do shape public opinion,
and in a democracy they do control the political process.
So now the only question which remains is this: To what end do the
Jews who control the media use their control? What is their aim? What
do they want? Now, the Politically Correct answer is that all the
Jewish media bosses want is what any other businessman wants. The
media bosses are simply businessmen, and their aim is simply to run
their businesses at a profit.
Well, I'm sorry, but that simply isn't true. It simply is not a
coincidence that everywhere you look in the mass media you see Jews in
control. It's not a coincidence that a group making up only a little
over two per cent of the population has virtually complete control
over the mass media. The unanimity of the mass media on virtually
every major issue of our time simply is not a coincidence. It is
simply not a coincidence that the media bosses all just happen to have
adopted the policy of hushing up Black-on-White crime and publicizing
as widely as possible any White-on-Black crime. All of these things
are planned and deliberate. They are the consequence of conscious
collaboration. Only a fool can believe that it's all just coincidence.
The Jewish media bosses know what they want. It is control -- not just
of the media, but of us: of everything. They want to own us and, to
the extent that they cannot own us, to destroy us…
You know the Germans didn't begin throwing the Jews out of Germany in
the 1930s because of Christian bigotry. It was because they wanted
their country back. The Germans wanted to run their own universities
and schools, their own newspapers and films, their own legal and
medical professions.
If you want to understand the historical record, you must study it. I
can't go through all of that for you in a half-hour program. I can
only point the way. And as for the commonsense aspect of understanding
what the Jewish media bosses are up to, we just need to clear the
cobwebs out of our heads and realize that every racially conscious
group strives for mastery, for domination, not just the Jews. That's
Nature's way. That's the way it is in every barnyard and every
schoolyard.
And that is why the media propaganda takes the deliberate slant it
does: trying to make us feel guilty, trying to kill our sense of
racial consciousness while the Jews keep theirs, trying to persuade us
to give up our arms, trying to silence all our dissident voices. Their
aim is for us to be racially unconscious, for us to be ashamed of our
nature and our traditions, for us to be afraid to organize for our
common good, afraid of being thought racists. The deliberate aim of
the Jewish media propaganda is to disarm us morally, to make us
rootless and defenseless, and then to destroy us. That is what is
happening now.
Think about it, and you'll see how it all fits together.
Topaz
Exposing the Real Racists
Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book
Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003
More than 500,000 copies of 'Jewish Supremacism' have been sold
worldwide. It is even sold within the Russian Duma (parliament).
Jewish leaders are extremely fearful of this book. I can illustrate
the cause of their concern by giving an example of David Duke's
technique in exposing what he calls Jewish supremacism.
If any prominent political person in the Western World publicly
announced that Jews are frequently disloyal to nations where they live
and that they view Gentiles as racially inferior, he would face
excoriation as an 'anti-Semite'. Probably, he would be driven from
office. Duke has no need to make such claims, for he simply quotes
very prominent and powerful Jews who make his point for him.
FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH
In the first few pages of Jewish Supremacism, Duke quotes Dr. Richard
Steinlight, a former head of National Affairs for the largest Jewish
organisation in the United States. Here is the quotation taken from a
2001 magazine article written by Dr. Steinlight:-
'I'll confess it at least, like thousands of other typical kids of my
generation I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a
quasi-separatist. Every summer for two months of ten formative
years... I attended Jewish summer camp. There, each morning, I saluted
a foreign flag, dressed in a uniform reflecting its colours, sang a
foreign national anthem, learned a foreign language... and was taught
the superiority of my people to the 'Gentiles' who oppressed us.
'We were taught to view non-Jews as... people less sensitive,
intelligent and moral than ourselves.'
This method of quoting major Jewish figures and sources is used
hundreds of times in Duke's book to advance his thesis that there is a
powerful Jewish supremacist element in Judaism and Zionism that
threatens not only the freedom of the Palestinian people but all
nations, including the United States.
Duke also uses direct quotes from the Talmud and other major Jewish
sources, such as the Jewish Encyclopedia to expose a long-standing
cadre of hateful, anti-Gentile Jewish supremacists. Shocking quotes
are displayed from major Jewish magazines that boast of a Jewish
supremacy over the media and politics of the United States. He finds
disturbing and hateful words from Jewish leaders, such as Ariel
Sharon, which openly support genocide, and he reveals quotations from
Israeli leaders who equate Zionism and Nazism. Of course, he also
cites many prominent Gentiles of historical and contemporary times,
but the Jewish quotations and sources have the greatest power.
Frankly, they are so convincing that Jewish leaders have sought to get
the book banned in many nations.
Interestingly, Jewish Supremacism was published first in Russia, the
same nation that gave birth to The Protocols of Zion. In 2000 it
quickly became a best seller throughout the entirety of the former
Eastern bloc. It even sells briskly in the corridors of the Russian
Duma (Parliament) and has prompted Levinsky, Goldman and other leading
Jews to seek its ban under old Soviet laws forbidding 'anti-Semitism'.
In the Autumn of 2000, Levinsky and others filed a formal complaint to
the Russian Prosecutor General and asked for the book to be classified
as anti-Semitic and thus illegal. After a year of close examination
(they painstakingly verified all 669 of the documentations), the
Russian Government shocked the Jewish community by officially
declaring that the book is not anti-Semitic. Jewish members of the
Duma then introduced new legislation aimed at outlawing 'Jewish
Supremacism', but it failed by a few votes.
Since then, the book has been sold in thousands of street corners
across the breadth of the Russian Federation and has now topped an
incredible 500,000 in print.
Translated into most of the Eastern European languages, the book has
won Duke many academic awards for its scholarship, including an
honorary Doctorate awarded by President's University, the second
largest university in the nation of Ukraine.
Subsequently the university itself published a best-selling Ukrainian
edition. In May of 2003, Free Speech Press published the English
version of Jewish Supremacism, accompanied by a storm of interest and
controversy. Jewish leaders are horrified that it is well on its way
to becoming the best-read book in the world on Zionism.
SMEARS BACKFIRED
Although Zionist organisations have tried to use Duke's media
characterisation as a 'white supremacist' to discredit his book, so
far their exploitation of his early-life involvement in a KKK group
has only backfired by making the book and its author more newsworthy.
Attacks by the ADL and other pro-Zionist groups have led to
sensationalist news coverage, causing even greater interest and
confounding those who desperately wanted Duke's book to die a quiet
death.
David Duke decries the label of white supremacist and says that while
he certainly desires the preservation of his own heritage he seeks no
supremacy over others. He maintains that those who scream most
hatefully against him are themselves guilty of the most extreme and
powerful supremacism on earth: Jewish supremacism.
When Duke lectured in some Persian Gulf nations last year, Zionist
leaders attempted to undercut his support by allegations of 'racism'.
Those organised efforts had little affect on the overflow, mixed-race
audiences that cheered almost his every word. As a former university
professor and a writer who has lectured occasionally on behalf of the
people of Palestine, I approached David Duke's book out of a curiosity
elicited by the intense Zionist efforts to suppress it. Actually, I
had readily accepted the negative portrayals of him I had read in the
Jewish press, but I wanted to see what all the commotion was about.
Why were they so anxious to ban this book and slander its author? To
my great surprise I discovered a most amazing book!
David Duke stated that he had set out with the ambitious goal of
writing the most powerful expose of Zionism ever put into print. With
extreme scepticism of his ability to accomplish such a lofty goal, I
began to read. Three days later, as I turned the last page, I knew
that he had accomplished more than he dreamed. Rather than just
assembling his facts in a dry textbook fashion, David Duke presents
his thesis in the first person. It is the personal narrative of a
thoughtful and enlightened young man who is sympathetic to Zionism,
but is awakened to its supremacist core that not only threatens the
Palestinians but his own beloved European-Americans as well. I could
not find even a trace of hatred, intemperance or true anti-Semitism in
this book. However, by extensive quoting of important Jewish leaders
and Zionist source materials, Duke exposes a deep well of Jewish
supremacist hatred against Gentiles. He points out that one is
unfairly labelled an 'anti-Semite' simply for exposing the hateful
pronouncements of Jewish supremacists.
ABSOLVES SOME JEWS
The book is clearly not anti-Semitic. Duke goes at length to point out
that not all Jews are supremacists, and that the supremacists not only
endanger the Gentile world but threaten innocent Jews by exposing them
to an inevitably hostile Gentile reaction. The book is in fact
dedicated to the late Dr. Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor and
Israeli peace activist whose life was dedicated to saving both Jews
and Gentiles from the dangers of 'Jewish supremacism'. David Duke
cleverly turns the term 'anti-Semitic' on its head by quoting
columnist Joseph Sobran's remark that the 'anti-Semite' is no longer
someone who dislikes Jews; he is now simply a person whom the Jews
don't like.
Jewish Supremacism begins with David Duke's first great epiphany on
the Jewish question: his learning that the Russian Revolution wasn't
Russian but overwhelmingly Jewish. Using powerful documentary
evidence, he shows that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually financed
and led by Jews who had their own agenda against the Czar. He quotes
from familiar and impeccable sources such as Winston Churchill, the
dispatches of the American ambassador to Russia, the chief of British
Intelligence and copious Jewish sources. For instance, he quotes a
report from the National Archives of the United States showing that of
the 384 members of the first Bolshevik government, there were more
than 300 Jews and only 13 ethnic Russians.
How could such an enormous fact of history be hidden? Duke asks. His
rhetorical question is answered throughout the rest of this book by
giving the clear evidence of the tremendous power exercised by Jewish
supremacists in government, media and the academic establishment. Not
only has the pre-eminent Jewish role in the Bolshevik Revolution and
its Gulags been quietly suppressed, but also even the very existence
of Jewish supremacism has been kept from public awareness. One can
freely discuss the evils of white supremacism, but if one dares to
expose Jewish supremacism, one will assuredly be labelled an
'anti-Semite', the ultimate term of opprobrium in modern society. In
very effective arguments, Duke points out that one is not called
'anti-Christian' for exposing the excesses of the Inquisition or
'anti-Muslim' for opposing the intolerance of some extremist Moslem
sects. But dare simply to quote the hateful statements of important
leaders of Judaism and Zionism, and in many countries one could well
wind up in prison for 'hate speech'.
One of the fascinating themes to which David Duke repeatedly turns is
the easily documented Jewish supremacist strategy of fostering extreme
chauvinism among their own people while at the same time working to
break down the group loyalty of the Gentiles among whom they live.
Jewish leaders have long made clear that Jewish communities often have
agendas that conflict with their Gentile hosts. Duke describes the
struggle over those agendas as similar to the contest of two football
teams. One team cultivates an extreme group loyalty through a chronic
recital of Gentile persecution and an accompanying 'chosen-people'
supremacist vision. The other is instilled with guilt and the idea
that teamwork is immoral. The main Jewish holidays are dominated by
the recounting of Gentile persecutions, and the Holocaust has now
achieved almost a religious significance in Jewish life. Duke quotes
many Jewish leaders proclaiming Jewish superiority and the need for
the race to preserve its racial genotype. Even today, Israel will
grant instant citizenship to an atheist Jew from New York, but forbids
Palestinians who were born in Israel to return. Israel also forbids
marriages between Jews and Gentiles.
While Jewish supremacists have these supremacist policies for their
own people, they relentlessly work to break down the immigration laws
of other nations. While they preach multi-culturalism and diversity
for almost every other country in which they dwell, they themselves
support and expect Americans to support a Zionist State, dedicated
exclusively to the Jewish people, religion and culture.
INFLUENCE ON MEDIA AND GOVERNMENT
In chapters on Jewish influence over the American mass media and
government, Duke offers extensive documentation that exceeds almost
anyone's suspicions. Major Jewish sources are quoted which boast of
their takeover and control of Hollywood, the news media and the most
sensitive part of the Government of the United States. For instance,
Duke quotes a major Israeli newspaper bragging about the fact that
Jews loyal to Israel make up seven out of the eleven members of the
secretive and sensitive National Security Council (NSC). The article
goes on to assert that "America no longer has a government of Goyim"
(Gentiles). Duke also quotes many US presidents and high government
officials who have dared to speak out about the Jewish supremacy over
the establishment. After thoroughly documenting Jewish supremacy in
government and media, he shows how their media power is used to stifle
public knowledge and understanding of this critical issue. Any
legitimate criticism of Jewish Supremacism is labelled
'anti-Semitism', and the Jewish supremacists almost exclusively define
that term.
In particularly interesting passages, Duke recounts how that when he
looked up the term 'anti-Semitism' in some popular encyclopaedias, he
found that the articles and recommended reading lists were authored
entirely by Jewish zealots! In every conflict with Gentiles, Jews are
always portrayed as completely innocent while Gentiles are portrayed
as totally evil. Duke suggests that the chronic portrayal of Gentiles
as inherently evil toward Jews is for Gentiles the equivalent of
'blood libel' for Jews.
Duke makes a compelling case that the nation of Israel is the doctrine
of Jewish supremacism put into action. In startling documentary
evidence from Israel, he shows that some of the early Zionist founders
of the country readily co-operated with Nazi Germany, praised Nazi
policies and claimed that their own ideology was similar. He also
quotes major Jewish figures in Israel who have had the courage to
condemn Israel's Nuremberg style racial laws, such as former Israeli
Supreme Court member Haim Cohen, thus:-
'The bitter irony of fate, which has led the same biological and
racist laws propagated by the Nazis and which inspired the infamous
Nuremberg laws to serve as a basis of Judaism within the state of
Israel.'
With these kinds of powerful quotes, it is no wonder that Zionists
around the world are extremely fearful of this book.
ON ISRAELI TERROR
Americans will find the last chapter on Israel of particular interest.
Duke unveils the long Israeli record of terrorism. He documents the
horrendous terror waged against the Palestinians; he also exposes
Israel's long record of terrorism and treachery against its greatest
benefactor, the United States! From major Jewish sources, he recounts
the Israeli terrorist attacks against America in the Lavon Affair, in
which Israeli agents set off bombs in American installations in Egypt
in a treacherous attempt to provoke America into war against that
nation. Duke presents copious evidence exposing the deliberate,
murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in which 34 Americans were
killed and 172 grievously wounded. The terrible damage inflicted on
the United States by Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard is also recounted.
Jewish supremacy in the American media and government has suppressed
any outcry against Israel's treachery. The Jewish supremacists have
even been able to prevent a formal Congressional investigation into
the attack on the USS Liberty. Duke makes the powerful point that
billions of dollars of American aid continue to flow to Israel even
after its treacherous attacks. He writes that supplying this aid is
the moral equivalent of sending military aid to Japan after the attack
on Pearl Harbour.
Duke also shows how the Zionist domination of American foreign policy
led directly to America's 9/11 catastrophe and a whole new series of
foreign policy moves that are leading to disaster. This timely book
shows the Jewish supremacist power behind the Iraq War, the
manipulation of the President and the American people with false
information, and the horrendous damage the war has done to our economy
and even our security. Duke shows how the war is costing us hundreds
of billions of dollars, continues to spill the blood of our military
men and certainly increases world hatred and terrorism against
America.
In one of the most shocking chapters of his work, Duke reveals the
damning evidence of Israeli treachery in the 9/11 attacks. He shows
that a massive Israeli spy ring was uncovered and apprehended in the
months before and after the attacks, and that some of the Mossad
agents had actually monitored the hijackers, including the leader
Mohammed Atta (five Israeli agents lived on his street). Warning
messages of the impending attacks were sent to Israeli firms with
offices both in Israel and the World Trade Centre. A group of Mossad
agents was arrested on 9/11 after they were found to have been filming
and cheering the attacks while they occurred. After they had been held
for a few months, Zionist Michael Chertoff of the US Department of
Justice released all the members of the Israeli spy ring and allowed
them to return to Israel - out of the reach of Congressional 9/11
investigators.
It is impossible to give the reader more than a glance into the depth
and power of this incredible book. Practically every paragraph is a
revelation. There is so much more that I could write about: detailing
how the Holocaust has cynically been used as a Zionist tool in
heightening Jewish solidarity and deflating criticism of Zionism and
Israel; how Jewish supremacists have used immigration as a weapon of
conquest, not only in Palestine but in the Western World as well. I
was fascinated by Duke's expose of Sigmund Freud as a secret Jewish
supremacist who thought of himself as a Hannibal destroying the
foundations of the Christian church and the European family as
Hannibal had sacked Rome. I could go on and on, but I will leave these
discoveries to you when you read this amazing book.
After I completed the book, I wanted to find out if it had the same
affect on others as it had on me. I gave it to two long-time friends
at the university where I taught for 11 years. One has conservative
leanings; the other is decidedly liberal; and I would describe both of
them as sympathetic to Israel. Both were so fascinated that they could
hardly put the book down, and one became so engrossed that he missed
his regular two o'clock class. They both agreed that Duke's book is
one of the best-argued that they have ever read, and used the
identical term of 'amazing' to describe it. My conservative friend
commented that many quotations were so shocking that he began to check
out the references and found them all to be accurate. "Hell" he said,
"If only half the documents Duke cites are authentic, there is enough
evidence here to start a revolution."
Joe Bruno
I'll tolerate any skin color or religion or nationality. I just won't
tolerate lying and cheating
and injustice.
Zeke
These above sites (including the great Pierce) have done more to hurt
the white man than any Jew ever did.
Joe Bruno
Topaz wrote:
> By William Pierce
>
> We've talked about many subjects on these American Dissident Voices
> programs, but one theme which has appeared in nearly every program has
> been the role of the Jews, either in our history or in our lives
> today. To a certain extent that's been unavoidable, because of the
> influence they have over current events through their control of the
> mass media
Many of the American media outlets between 1895 and 1950 were owned by
William Randolph Hearst, a supporter of Hitler and the Nazis:
Joe Bruno
Topaz wrote:
> Exposing the Real Racists
> Edgar Johnston, PhD. reviews an important new book
> Jewish Supremacism by David Duke. Published by Free Speech Press, 2003
>
David Duke moves to the traditional homeland of "White Nationalists"
April 15, 2003 | BIG SPRING, Texas (AP) -- Former Ku Klux Klan leader
David Duke turned himself in to a federal prison Tuesday to begin
serving a
15-month sentence for mail and tax fraud.
Duke, who was driven to the west Texas prison in a pink Jeep, did not
appear
to acknowledge about eight admirers outside who waved signs that read
"Duke
for President" and "Free David Duke."
[...]
Duke pleaded guilty to falsely reporting a gross income of $18,831 in
1998,
rather than the actual $65,034, and to bilking supporters. The mail
fraud
charge grew out of what prosecutors described as a scheme between 1993
and
1999 to swindle thousands of followers out of hundreds of thousands of
dollars through a direct mail campaign.
[...]
(http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2003/04/15/david_duke/)
Topaz
>
>These above sites (including the great Pierce) have done more to hurt
>the white man than any Jew ever did.
I think I can top that one. Osoma Bin Laden is really George Bush in
disguise!!!!!!
Topaz
wrote:
>Many of the American media outlets between 1895 and 1950 were owned by
>William Randolph Hearst, a supporter of Hitler and the Nazis:
>
So that's why America really went down the tubes in the 60's
By Dr. William Pierce
http://www.natvan.com
"The Jews were very influential in Germany after the First World War.
They were strongly entrenched in the legal profession, in banking, in
advertising and merchandising, in show business, in organized vice, in
publishing and other media. They were trying hard to change the spirit
of Germany. They were pushing modernism in art, music, and literature.
Topaz
"People like David Duke and Curt Maynard often get vilified not so
much for their views on multiculturalism and ethnic diversity but
because of their outspoken feelings towards Jews. If we weren't all as
brainwashed as we are, we wouldn't have any problems recognizing that
there is plenty to be critical about organized Jewry in general and
the Jews-only state in particular. I'm certainly not going to play by
the rules of the Jewish Mafia and allow them to silence someone who
exposes their crimes only because he has some views that don't comply
with what's considered to be politically correct. Not on my blog.
First off I consider it a privilege to be mentioned in the same
sentence with Dr. David Duke [Yes he has a PhD, something the Jewish
media doesn't want you to know], a man that has sacrificed a great
deal to direct the worlds attention toward the worlds most pressing
problem and that is the modern Jewish Question. You can bet your last
dollar that Duke's most "persistent persecutors" don't give a damn
about Duke's views on multiculturalism, they are almost all Jews and
they reject multiculturalism themselves, when and where it applies to
Jewry and Jewry alone, what they care about most and the reason Duke
has been so persistently persecuted is that he refuses to remain
silent about Zionism, Jews and Jewry. It is the very same with Ernst
Zundel; a man that sits in a German prison at this very moment,
arrested more than three years ago, who has yet to be given a real
trial, let alone convicted of anything. His crime? - Questioning some
of the many questionable aspects of the official holocaust story.
Zundel thinks it's absurd that an atomic bomb was used by the Nazi's
to murder Jews at Auschwitz, he also thinks it unlikely that that the
industrious Germans found it necessary to employ a "pedal actuated
brain bashing machine at Sachesenhausen." If you find the preceding
two stories a bit far fetched, congratulations, you're a holocaust
denier! If you were in Germany you'd be imprisoned for your thought
crime.
In respect to Duke's views on minority groups and multiculturalism -
doesn't he have as much a right to his opinions as you do yours? Does
he, or does he not have the Constitutional right to share those
opinions with those that will listen? If you don't believe this is the
case, congratulations, you are actually part of the problem, not part
of the solution and a qualified moron in your own right. I don't
particularly care what Duke's views are on the aforementioned topic of
multiculturalism or even race and ethnicity for that matter, I do
however care and care deeply about Duke's views on Jewry and on that
topic I am wholeheartedly in agreement with his views. My point of
view and I suspect his as well, on matters related to the
"multicultural movement," and the "tolerance and diversity" factions
in this country is that they are nothing more than a symptom of a far
greater problem, I don't waste my time obsessing about them, because
as long as the media remains firmly in the hands of Jewish
Supremacists, there will forever be racial and ethnic strife, when and
where there isn't any, the Jewish media will fabricate it. I consider
spending an inordinate amount of my precious time focused on the
reality of the disproportionate amount of black crime to be
nonproductive, but at the same time, it is my firm belief that those
that want to learn about such matters, should be able to do so without
being scourged - the entire illegal immigrant issue is of the utmost
importance, but it too is merely a distraction, because as long as the
United States government remains subservient to Zionism and the
interests of organized Jewry, we're going to get more and more
illegals in this country no matter the amount of bitching and
complaining we engage in. I don't blame Juan for wanting to come to
the United States and make ten times the money he can in Mexico, I
blame this government [Democrat and Republican alike] for allowing him
to do so. It isn't Juan that disassembled our industrial capacity in
the 1980s and sold it off to Asia for pennies on the dollar, it isn't
Juan that's "outsourcing" our service sector today - Juan is not the
problem, but he is being made the scapegoat by the Jewish media in
exactly the same way that Arabs too are being portrayed as the problem
in the Mid East, which is a joke and one that any fool should be able
to comprehend at this point in the game. If you can't see it, you're
definitely stupid, delusional, or complicit.
Most Americans are awake enough to see our society going to hell in a
handbag - many are awake enough to equate the media as being at least
partially responsible for this obvious trend, but unfortunately few
Americans are awake enough to see that it isn't the Arabs that own the
media apparatus - it's the Jews stupid!
Recently David Duke wrote an essay entitled "Are Jewish Supremacists
now our friends?" In it he describes the newest strategy employed by
Jewry in the face of the growing awareness among Americans that Jews
do indeed have far more influence in the media and the government than
their numbers would suggest and that is that Jewry wants to reinvent
itself as "white." In other words Jews want Europeans and European
Americans to believe that Jews too are whites and thus sympathize with
and align themselves with Jews against the enemies of western
civilization, i.e. Muslims. Duke knows that western civilization has
never had a greater enemy than Jewry and for that reason he wrote the
essay - once again proving that his attention is focused upon Jews
rather than "brown people," i.e. Arabs. It is for this reason and this
reason alone that David Duke is so aggressively and relentlessly
pursued by the media - if he were attacking Muslims he'd be on Fox
News today as a rehabilitated and "repentant" analyst, much in the
same way that Mark Furman has been forgiven and is now a highly sought
after legal analyst and frequent guest on the networks. Don't fool
yourself; Duke is not the devil he has been portrayed to be in the
media. While all the "multiculturalists" and tolerance and diversity
orientated politicians here in America have been screaming "kill the
Arabs, kill the Arabs," Duke has been on a world wide peace keeping
mission and delivering speeches in Arab countries and has come to be
seen as an ally rather than enemy in Arab [brown] nations.
If one hasn't read Dr. David Duke's book Jewish Supremacism then one
is not as familiar with the problem of organized Jewry as one should
be. It is simply required reading - that book more than anything else
is why Duke has been so mercilessly persecuted in the last four years
- the Jewish Supremacists in Washington have never, nor will they
ever, forgive him for writing that book - it is simply eye opening to
say the least. Despite what the media would like you to believe, Duke
doesn't "make up," the information he utilizes in the book, rather he
uses Jewish sources almost exclusively, i.e. sources written by Jews
themselves - all he does is collect them and give them the attention
they deserve - the attention the Jewish media has no intention of ever
giving them. Duke's book is a worldwide best seller, it'd been
translated into dozens of languages, it's sold in the Russian Duma
[Russia's Congress], it's sold in the Bazaar's of Iraq, Iran, Jordan,
Egypt, it's sold in book stores all across Asia, all over the world in
fact, with the exception of the mainstream market in the United
States, Canada and western Europe where the Jews have monopolized the
publishing industry and won't allow you to acquire it easily."
http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2006/11/i-will-not-recant.html
Ben H C'ramer
>
> Dr. Gassen Burnham wrote:
>
>
> Many of your marbles are missing.
This, from the self-confessed mental defective.
You're a fool, b'runo.
>
Ben H C'ramer
They declared war on Germany. Read a little, b'runo. Get the 7 year old down
the street to assist with comprehension.
Ben H C'ramer
So!!!!! In addition to being a mental defective, you're also a self-hating
fool, b'runo.
>
Kurt Knoll
everybody has to believe all of it what they are saying. Makes me think if
they have to be so aggressive victimizing other something is smelling very
bad. You know it I know it they also know it. Could this be the reason why
they have to victimize also others with the hope of making them obedient or
totally silence them.
Kurt Knoll.
"Ben H C'ramer" <benjami...@home.net> wrote in message
news:ejln8b$2ma3$1...@otis.netspace.net.au...